What do you think caused the Younger Dryas? Edit: Mark Boslough's criticisms of the Comet Research Group were relevant to the point he was making, which is to explain why the mainstream scientific community is skeptical of evidence for which raw data have been withheld and which is based on samples collected and prepared by Allen West, who they regard as untrustworthy. Because Boslough's criticisms are relevant, they are not (by definition) a case of the argumentum ad hominem fallacy. Mr. Boslough was very respectful when he reached out and we both agreed that more content should be made regarding this topic. I plan to work closely with him to address some of these more nuanced topics in the future.

@Yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeet

9 ай бұрын

Love your videos Really great job

@13igp00h

9 ай бұрын

Love your videos 🤙 When it comes to the younger dryas there's far too much misunderstanding of the types for forces we're talking about it an impact. This is a simulation Nasa Made of the creation of earth's moon. It shows the ejection of far more material than what the moon is composed of and the subsequent impacts back to the earth. Now, our solar system is in motion, and picture the impact with the same motions of a slingshot. kzread.info/dash/bejne/nYagys58h9PSoc4.html

@changeminds2736

9 ай бұрын

It's all Joe Rogan, Graham Hancock and Randal Carlsons fault. They for sure went back in time and made mammoths eat wild flowers in season, made them stand in one spot until they were fash frozen.

@jamesneary663

9 ай бұрын

Meteor strike. This is just propaganda.

@markedis5902

9 ай бұрын

I don’t know what caused it but we really need another one

I'm happy I get to live in a period of human history with indoor heaters and air conditioners and grateful to my ancestors who toughed it out during the Younger Dryas.

@SiriusSphynx

9 ай бұрын

And all the people in other countries that suffer under the politics of your leaders so that you can enjoy your first world privilege

@gadpivs

9 ай бұрын

Constant exercise keeps you warm. In fact, if you wear heavy animal skins even in the winter while constantly on the move, you can risk overheating. In the Gravettian period, there were also surprisingly sturdy homes made of mammoth bones, with excellent insulation. Igloos maintained by the Innuit, which are not very far off from Paleolithic homes, can be up to sixty degrees warmer inside than the outside. At any rate, the sacrifice you have to make in order to have modern heating, where you must spend most of your time working at a meaningless and stressful job while isolated from family instead of finding a kind of spiritual and social satisfaction in your work, is not worth it. A heater cannot cure depression, loneliness, or a purposeless existence. A little bit of acute strife that can be dealt with collectively as a group swiftly is actually better for you psychologically than constant comfort, because as highly social problem-solvers, we evolved to enjoy it.

@firstlast-cx8xq

9 ай бұрын

@@gadpivsI agree. Ancient people only ate about once a day. They weren’t consumed by materialistic things. In summers they probably worked in the early mornings or later evenings. And in winter they probably did the most at peak sunlight. And just relaxed the rest. I mean. It was still a hard life. But I think they probably lived happier lifes also.

@anndriggers6660

9 ай бұрын

Thank you ancestors! They were absolute beasts to have survived all of the crazy conditions they had to live through.

@kalrandom7387

9 ай бұрын

Indoor plumbing, toilet paper, vehicles to where I can go to the store and get what I need instead of going out in nature and hunting it

I think one of my favorite phrases in most of the “Ice Age” documentaries I’ve watched is the phrase, “at the end of the last Ice Age…” um, you mean the end of the last Glacial Period? The last Ice Age hasn’t ended. We’re IN an Ice Age, we’re just in an Interglacial period.

@lindakayaz

9 ай бұрын

YES! We went to the Smithsonian several years ago. They had an exhibit about ice ages and that's when I learned we were still in an Ice Age!

@justmenotyou3151

9 ай бұрын

Yes. You got it. So many people use the term improperly.

@garylancaster8612

9 ай бұрын

I regularly tell people this and it blows their minds.

@christopherellis2663

9 ай бұрын

To face the facts is too disturbing for the masses. They were told that everything is onwards and upwards.

@wazirakbarkhan.wardag..

9 ай бұрын

Facts

Another quote attributed to Twain. "The more I learn about people the more I like my dog." Your reporting seem to be very unbiased. Thank you.

@penrythajanitor4644

9 ай бұрын

I'm sure Hitler said that too, 'The more I know of men the more I love dogs'...still, take your pick, they had a point...

@donkeyslayer9879

8 ай бұрын

Twain never said that. You are quoting a translation from fhe French language. Twain didn't speak French.

As a botanist, I was delighted to hear about a geologic era being named after a flower!!

@moemuggy4971

9 ай бұрын

Having house plants doesn't make you a botanist 😅

@micahfoley9572

9 ай бұрын

In the future I'm hoping they call this era the Titan Arum

@micahfoley9572

9 ай бұрын

@@moemuggy4971 you guys know each other? I'm always hoping I'll spot someone I know on here but sadly it never happens lol

@lizblock9593

9 ай бұрын

@@moemuggy4971 These are some bold assumptions that you know anything about my qualifications as a botanist or a house plant owner. Please cite your sources!

@moemuggy4971

9 ай бұрын

@@lizblock9593 If you Google, "is Liz block a botonist?" Wikipedia say, "Nope, never heard of her"

Absolutely love your content!! I'm a career biologist and your content is fantastic, always academic, always based on published evidence! Simply amazing!!!

In my professional past, I was the manufacturing manager whose team was criticized by "scientists" who complained that the reason their instruments didn't work was because my manufacturing organization "didn't build them correctly," when, in fact, the reason their stuff didn't work was because THEIR STUFF DIDN'T WORK. Respect the science; EVALUATE the scientist. They're human too, with all of our faults and biases.

@allie1953

8 ай бұрын

Isn't there some expression out there, also, about 90% of scientists agreeing with those who fund them? 😀

@user-rm2rq8fq1l

5 ай бұрын

Also some institutions that are supposed to tell the truth about our history have lied or withheld information given to them by non scientists who found strange artifacts b/c the artifacts did not fit into the institution’s set idea of how our history progressed. Not so long ago the Smithsonian Institution admitted to destroying artifacts that were anomalous to their own historical paradigm such as giant bones & artifacts found in the US that came from the old world before Columbus “discovered” America.

“…no amount of correction would be sufficient to make it publishable.” I love a good academic diss.

As an academic and archaeologist, I'm always hesitant to turn to KZread for anything on the topics I study. But, this video proved me wrong - it was rigorous, critical, and well-researched. Nice job putting CRG on blast - they are a bunch of charlatans making a mockery of the scientific method. Kudos for the excellent video, and especially for changing my opinion on this type of medium.

@NORTH02

29 күн бұрын

Thank you for the kind words! This platform is full of misinformation and grifters and occasionally I find it appropriate to expose their conduct. The KZread channel “world of antiquity” has excellent content dismantling misinformation. Watch his “myths of ancient history” series. Also, if you would like to help out with my research, reach out to me through email. Thanks!

The continuing journey of NORTH 02 keeps getting more entertaining, and informative. Thank you.

@medievalhistory169

9 ай бұрын

Rcccbcfcccdccccccccccccççccvccfcaccfccdçdvcccçccçccccccddcccvfcccca cc'd dccccccccçacccccccdccccccccddfdddçbcccçccccççdcxfdcçdçccçccçcçdcdcçca ççcc acçdçcçccçcççdcfcdcxccççccfccdddfda ccdçfçcçdccccfda cda cdcccççdca CCA cça aca caçcçcçccçcda ccda cca çdaca ca cdççççdd aca ca CA CA CA CA c aa ccdcfçcda. Cbcc acaca ada CA ccda caca ca ca. Ca CA ca CA CA. Acaca çccccdcdca cda ca CA acda àa. Cdacaca CA ccççda ca. Cça. ACCA CA. Cddca ca. Aca ca CA CA ccccca cca ca ccda c aca ca ca c aa aca aa CA CA CA ccda cccaca CA CA. À c a àca c. C c c. C. Cc aa CA vda ca CA CAS. Ca CA CA a CA. Ca. Aa CA ca ccacc aca CA CA CA. C aa ca CA. Aaca ca cca. A. Ca cddda caca. Àa a ca. A ca CA CA a CA CA CA caca c a aa a. À. Ccaca CA CA caca ca CA. Aca a ca caca c aca. A a. A àca à a àc àca CA CA cda CA. Ca à cca. Àa a. Ca ca cc àà àaà.

@Jakub-kw1rx

8 ай бұрын

«In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. The same was in the beginning with God. All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made. In him was life; and the life was the light of men. And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not. There was a man sent from God, whose name was John. The same came for a witness, to bear witness of the Light, that all men through him might believe. He was not that Light, but was sent to bear witness of that Light. That was the true Light, which lighteth every man that cometh into the world. He was in the world, and the world was made by him, and the world knew him not. He came unto his own, and his own received him not. But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name: Which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God. And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth. John bare witness of him, and cried, saying, This was he of whom I spake, He that cometh after me is preferred before me: for he was before me. And of his fulness have all we received, and grace for grace. For the law was given by Moses, but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ. No man hath seen God at any time; the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him. And this is the record of John, when the Jews sent priests and Levites from Jerusalem to ask him, Who art thou? And he confessed, and denied not; but confessed, I am not the Christ. And they asked him, What then? Art thou Elias? And he saith, I am not. Art thou that prophet? And he answered, No. Then said they unto him, Who art thou? that we may give an answer to them that sent us. What sayest thou of thyself? He said, I am the voice of one crying in the wilderness, Make straight the way of the Lord, as said the prophet Esaias. And they which were sent were of the Pharisees. And they asked him, and said unto him, Why baptizest thou then, if thou be not that Christ, nor Elias, neither that prophet? John answered them, saying, I baptize with water: but there standeth one among you, whom ye know not; He it is, who coming after me is preferred before me, whose shoe's latchet I am not worthy to unloose. These things were done in Bethabara beyond Jordan, where John was baptizing. The next day John seeth Jesus coming unto him, and saith, Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world. This is he of whom I said, After me cometh a man which is preferred before me: for he was before me. And I knew him not: but that he should be made manifest to Israel, therefore am I come baptizing with water. And John bare record, saying, I saw the Spirit descending from heaven like a dove, and it abode upon him. And I knew him not: but he that sent me to baptize with water, the same said unto me, Upon whom thou shalt see the Spirit descending, and remaining on him, the same is he which baptizeth with the Holy Ghost. And I saw, and bare record that this is the Son of God. Again the next day after John stood, and two of his disciples; And looking upon Jesus as he walked, he saith, Behold the Lamb of God! And the two disciples heard him speak, and they followed Jesus. Then Jesus turned, and saw them following, and saith unto them, What seek ye? They said unto him, Rabbi, (which is to say, being interpreted, Master,) where dwellest thou? He saith unto them, Come and see. They came and saw where he dwelt, and abode with him that day: for it was about the tenth hour. One of the two which heard John speak, and followed him, was Andrew, Simon Peter's brother. He first findeth his own brother Simon, and saith unto him, We have found the Messias, which is, being interpreted, the Christ. And he brought him to Jesus. And when Jesus beheld him, he said, Thou art Simon the son of Jona: thou shalt be called Cephas, which is by interpretation, A stone. The day following Jesus would go forth into Galilee, and findeth Philip, and saith unto him, Follow me. Now Philip was of Bethsaida, the city of Andrew and Peter. Philip findeth Nathanael, and saith unto him, We have found him, of whom Moses in the law, and the prophets, did write, Jesus of Nazareth, the son of Joseph. And Nathanael said unto him, Can there any good thing come out of Nazareth? Philip saith unto him, Come and see. Jesus saw Nathanael coming to him, and saith of him, Behold an Israelite indeed, in whom is no guile! Nathanael saith unto him, Whence knowest thou me? Jesus answered and said unto him, Before that Philip called thee, when thou wast under the fig tree, I saw thee. Nathanael answered and saith unto him, Rabbi, thou art the Son of God; thou art the King of Israel. Jesus answered and said unto him, Because I said unto thee, I saw thee under the fig tree, believest thou? thou shalt see greater things than these. And he saith unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Hereafter ye shall see heaven open, and the angels of God ascending and descending upon the Son of man. And the third day there was a marriage in Cana of Galilee; and the mother of Jesus was there: And both Jesus was called, and his disciples, to the marriage. And when they wanted wine, the mother of Jesus saith unto him, They have no wine. Jesus saith unto her, Woman, what have I to do with thee? mine hour is not yet come. His mother saith unto the servants, Whatsoever he saith unto you, do it. And there were set there six waterpots of stone, after the manner of the purifying of the Jews, containing two or three firkins apiece. Jesus saith unto them, Fill the waterpots with water. And they filled them up to the brim. And he saith unto them, Draw out now, and bear unto the governor of the feast. And they bare it. When the ruler of the feast had tasted the water that was made wine, and knew not whence it was: (but the servants which drew the water knew;) the governor of the feast called the bridegroom, And saith unto him, Every man at the beginning doth set forth good wine; and when men have well drunk, then that which is worse: but thou hast kept the good wine until now. This beginning of miracles did Jesus in Cana of Galilee, and manifested forth his glory; and his disciples believed on him. After this he went down to Capernaum, he, and his mother, and his brethren, and his disciples: and they continued there not many days. And the Jews' passover was at hand, and Jesus went up to Jerusalem, And found in the temple those that sold oxen and sheep and doves, and the changers of money sitting: And when he had made a scourge of small cords, he drove them all out of the temple, and the sheep, and the oxen; and poured out the changers' money, and overthrew the tables; And said unto them that sold doves, Take these things hence; make not my Father's house an house of merchandise. And his disciples remembered that it was written, The zeal of thine house hath eaten me up. Then answered the Jews and said unto him, What sign shewest thou unto us, seeing that thou doest these things? Jesus answered and said unto them, Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up. Then said the Jews, Forty and six years was this temple in building, and wilt thou rear it up in three days? But he spake of the temple of his body. When therefore he was risen from the dead, his disciples remembered that he had said this unto them; and they believed the scripture, and the word which Jesus had said. Now when he was in Jerusalem at the passover, in the feast day, many believed in his name, when they saw the miracles which he did. But Jesus did not commit himself unto them, because he knew all men, And needed not that any should testify of man: for he knew what was in man.» The Gospel of Jesus Christ - John - Chapter 1...

One of the few channels that make me stay in this platform, people like you should have way more reconigtion! Thanks for making my days in this planet richer

The big issue I have with the human pressure being the cause of the megafauna extinction in so many regions of the world is that the very continent where humans originated and have been the most prolific, Africa, has retained its megafauna to this day. Despite the immense population and demands for food by the population of Africa over the millenia and even to this day, its megafauna still exists. Africa has retained almost every megafauna species it has started with right up until the encroachment of modern men and modern technologies. It has only been in the last two centuries that we saw some of these species like the Barbary Lion disappear from the continent and impacts on the population of other species like gorillas become profound and push it towards extinction. This flies in the face of the idea that human kill all the large animals around them for food, does it not? Especially when it is clear that humans were preyed on by megafauna predators just like the other animals. Just like humans in Africa are to this day. Yet we are to believe that disperse bands of hunter gatherers managed to wipe out more resilient species over not just the North American and South American continents but also Europe and Asia as well? I do not see the evidence for this type of prolific murder especially when we found a huge population of humans living in N.America (estimated 4 million - 10 million in the 15th century) when it was colonized and also a massive population of large fauna species like bison numbering over 30 million. Either some other cause than human pressure is behind the extinction of the megafauna around the world 10,000+ years ago or we need to explain why these anomalies of thriving cohabitation large populations existed in Africa and pre Columbian N.America.

@tonyadamson641

9 ай бұрын

I agree. It doesn't add up, especially since the wide spread Clovis people vanished in the same era.

@swirvinbirds1971

9 ай бұрын

African megafauna evolved alongside humans and there was still a decline there as well with the arise of humans. Megafauna extinctions across every continent follows the arrival of man. If it wasn't true in North America, it would be an outlier.... But it doesn't. It follows the same pattern as well.

@swirvinbirds1971

9 ай бұрын

​@@tonyadamson641they didn't vanish. Literally about 80% of all native people in North and South America are directly tied to the Colvis people by DNA. There was no decline in the people, there was a decline in the use of Clovis tools.

@socket_error1000

9 ай бұрын

@@swirvinbirds1971 Making the arrival of humans the cause simply by correlating the extinctions with their arrival without any other evidence to support it is a fallacy. Especially when we now know that humans were living in N.America for a lot longer than previously believed. So the arrival hypothesis fails in this case because we know the Clovis people in N.America died out at the same time as the megafauna. African versions of the same animals types that existed elsewhere are not more adapted to deal with humans simply because they evolved from the same base ancestors in Africa. Humans outside of Africa were no different than those in Africa. If human activity, hunting techniques, and pressures were capable of leading to those types of extinctions elsewhere then there would have been none left in Africa either. It makes more sense that the rapid change in climate had more to do with the massive amount of die off. Animals that had adapted over hundreds of thousands of years suddenly had to adapt to a warmer climate in centuries. Only a few found a niche and survived that rapid change. Unless they were on the one continent that was largely unaffected by ice age changes, Africa.

@taaskeprins

9 ай бұрын

Interesting discussion. In Europe ans Asia the extinction of the Neanderthals (40.000 years ago) also synchronizes with the influx of modern man in these continents. Neanderthals had been around for 350.000 years! So in Africa there were many more food sources for man than just meat. In colder climates meat will be the most prominent food sources. In Africa large herds of herbivors could form because of the abundance of food for these animals. There would ne no huntings pressure on these herds. Perhaps in South America the land was not very suitable for the formation of large herds (no vast grasslands?) and would hunting pressure have a larger impact. Why the bison survived while other animals perished couls also be a combination of all these factors.?

I'm a misanthrope, therefore, critical of everyone lol. I agree that pseudo-science does plenty of harm to scientific fields, but I also think it does plenty of good. It causes people to question accepted norms which can in turn force more careful and rigorous studies. I don't know if it's a proper balance, just pointing out that it's not all bad. We can learn a lot in debunking wild claims. I personally think the Younger Dryas was not caused by any one single factor, but many of the factors you mentioned combined, even the impact idea. However, I don't think the impact was one, single large object like a comet. The reason we have predictable meteor showers is that the orbit of Earth regularly takes us through rock clouds in space. Look up the Leonids and Orionids for examples of what I mean. A teeny tiny little variation in our orbit, the sort of variation we only know about these days due to advancements in sciences, could have no noticeable change in climate but could be just enough to take us through slightly more densely packed sections of those rock clouds during regular meteor showers. IF that's the case, combine a bunch of small impacts with the already happening climate change for a bunch of smaller, localized impact winter effects, add in some salt imbalance in the currents, sprinkle in a dash of vulcanism, perhaps any number of other factors to spice things up, and you've got a recipe something like the Younger Dryas. I mean, look at what just the wildfires in Canada are doing, with the smoke cloud reaching all the way to Europe, some of that blocking out some of the sunlight from reaching the surface. If fires like those were happening with everything else, it's easy to see not only what happened, but why the northern hemisphere was most effected. Point is, it's almost never one single trigger for such events, but a wildly complicated web of smaller things that add up to something bigger.

@melaniephillips4238

9 ай бұрын

I agree with your viewpoint. The YDIH posits the possibility of multiple impacts over a period of time as the Earth moved through the debris of the fragmented Comet Enke from around 12,500 years ago to 10,000 years ago (which we still move through twice yearly today). These repeated impacts, likely on the ice sheet could have produced the multiple impact proxies all over the world. The author's dismissal of the impact site(s) and the black mat layer produced harkens back to the initial scientific dismissal of the Drs. Alvarez's discovery of the iridium layer at the K-T boundary that ended the reign of the dinosaurs...that is until the Chixalub crater was found in the Yucatan. There are a growing number of degreed scientists affirming this hypothesis due to the mounting data from all over the world. I appreciate that the author expressed his...possible openness to the YDIH, but the nuance seemed to be damning with faint praise. The black mat, nano diamonds, carbon spherules etc. were found in my home state of South Carolina by Dr. Albert Goodyear of USC at the Topper site-- and there is no geological record of volcanic activity at that time period in this region. There is much more intricacy to the YDIH than the author gives in his simplified description.

@DryptosaurusDavid

8 ай бұрын

Glad I’m not the only one who agrees with challenging the norms of archaeology. Graham Hancock is trying to do what you’re saying and getting endless resentment for that, i believe what he’s trying to do, challenging the norms of archeology with new ideas, even though his methods are flawed. (Someday Graham Hancock is gonna get the respect he deserves.)

@2msvalkyrie529

4 ай бұрын

Unlike genuine scientists , anyone who asks Hancock for actual evidence to back up his claims is immediately accused of " attacking " him.. !!

@russellmillar7132

3 ай бұрын

Do you have any examples of pseudoscience forcing more careful and rigorous studies? Which studies?

@little-wytch

3 ай бұрын

​@@russellmillar7132 I didn't mean anything specific. I meant more that questioning everything can lead to new ways to approach problems and new discoveries. I'm not sure if this will be specific enough for you, but remember that when they were first proposed, ideas like evolution and plate tectonics and such were considered pseudoscience. In those cases, they became actual science. That's what I mean about forcing more rigorous studies, working harder to prove a point to be either true or false.

There's no way humans killed 12million animal species in such a short time with stone weapons, plus i don't think they would kill to extinction in those days because of how important survival was.

@4bidden1

9 ай бұрын

Don’t you think the humans would have to survive and kill whether they knew or not the body counts in their respective ecosystems?

@matthewmckinney5387

9 ай бұрын

@@4bidden1 that doesn't mean killing for fun, they wouldn't over kill because they knew theyd need more later to survive. Also they were limited by how long they could store meat as well so it wouldn't work to over kill and they risk losing food due to spoiling

@4bidden1

9 ай бұрын

@@matthewmckinney5387 I don’t think they were killing for fun..I think humans were just too OP once they became more efficient at hunting and as their populations started to grow..they did do some bad practices like for example man-made fires in Australia or running herds off cliffs but these weren’t the main hunting methods

@deborahbennett6544

7 ай бұрын

@@4bidden1 Man made fires in Australia by the indigenous people were small cool burns to encourage grass to grow so that kangaroo and emu herds would range close by. The landscape in Australia was like a well kept parkland when the invaders came. Our government is now employing indigenous people to teach about cool burning practices as it is good for wildfire prevention.

@4bidden1

7 ай бұрын

@@deborahbennett6544 there was a mass extinction in Australia associated with the arrival of the “indigenous” as well

Thank you, this is the first video mentioning that the climate change was so regional and how delayed the timing was in certain locations. Makes me wonder if the ocean circulation changed and took time to work it’s way around the globe.

@kckc4955

9 ай бұрын

I was thinking the same thing, I hadn’t heard about how different the changes were across the world. I’m always learning when I visit this channel.

@k1j2f30

9 ай бұрын

@@kckc4955 I think meteors and comets just like to impact on one side of the globe, more than the other!

@thesjkexperience

9 ай бұрын

@@k1j2f30 that too lol. Ten years ago I was certain it had to be something extraterrestrial, but it’s not coming into focus as much as I would like. Again, it may have been many small impacts and I don’t know how that might show up in other data. Why were these climate change events so regional? What could have caused them? Multiple “fireball” events like the regional Chicago and Peshtego Wisconsin fires of the 1800s could have caused massive regional melts that affect melt water. Someone clever will tie it all together, I hope! 🤗

@Jakub-kw1rx

8 ай бұрын

«In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. The same was in the beginning with God. All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made. In him was life; and the life was the light of men. And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not. There was a man sent from God, whose name was John. The same came for a witness, to bear witness of the Light, that all men through him might believe. He was not that Light, but was sent to bear witness of that Light. That was the true Light, which lighteth every man that cometh into the world. He was in the world, and the world was made by him, and the world knew him not. He came unto his own, and his own received him not. But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name: Which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God. And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth. John bare witness of him, and cried, saying, This was he of whom I spake, He that cometh after me is preferred before me: for he was before me. And of his fulness have all we received, and grace for grace. For the law was given by Moses, but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ. No man hath seen God at any time; the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him. And this is the record of John, when the Jews sent priests and Levites from Jerusalem to ask him, Who art thou? And he confessed, and denied not; but confessed, I am not the Christ. And they asked him, What then? Art thou Elias? And he saith, I am not. Art thou that prophet? And he answered, No. Then said they unto him, Who art thou? that we may give an answer to them that sent us. What sayest thou of thyself? He said, I am the voice of one crying in the wilderness, Make straight the way of the Lord, as said the prophet Esaias. And they which were sent were of the Pharisees. And they asked him, and said unto him, Why baptizest thou then, if thou be not that Christ, nor Elias, neither that prophet? John answered them, saying, I baptize with water: but there standeth one among you, whom ye know not; He it is, who coming after me is preferred before me, whose shoe's latchet I am not worthy to unloose. These things were done in Bethabara beyond Jordan, where John was baptizing. The next day John seeth Jesus coming unto him, and saith, Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world. This is he of whom I said, After me cometh a man which is preferred before me: for he was before me. And I knew him not: but that he should be made manifest to Israel, therefore am I come baptizing with water. And John bare record, saying, I saw the Spirit descending from heaven like a dove, and it abode upon him. And I knew him not: but he that sent me to baptize with water, the same said unto me, Upon whom thou shalt see the Spirit descending, and remaining on him, the same is he which baptizeth with the Holy Ghost. And I saw, and bare record that this is the Son of God. Again the next day after John stood, and two of his disciples; And looking upon Jesus as he walked, he saith, Behold the Lamb of God! And the two disciples heard him speak, and they followed Jesus. Then Jesus turned, and saw them following, and saith unto them, What seek ye? They said unto him, Rabbi, (which is to say, being interpreted, Master,) where dwellest thou? He saith unto them, Come and see. They came and saw where he dwelt, and abode with him that day: for it was about the tenth hour. One of the two which heard John speak, and followed him, was Andrew, Simon Peter's brother. He first findeth his own brother Simon, and saith unto him, We have found the Messias, which is, being interpreted, the Christ. And he brought him to Jesus. And when Jesus beheld him, he said, Thou art Simon the son of Jona: thou shalt be called Cephas, which is by interpretation, A stone. The day following Jesus would go forth into Galilee, and findeth Philip, and saith unto him, Follow me. Now Philip was of Bethsaida, the city of Andrew and Peter. Philip findeth Nathanael, and saith unto him, We have found him, of whom Moses in the law, and the prophets, did write, Jesus of Nazareth, the son of Joseph. And Nathanael said unto him, Can there any good thing come out of Nazareth? Philip saith unto him, Come and see. Jesus saw Nathanael coming to him, and saith of him, Behold an Israelite indeed, in whom is no guile! Nathanael saith unto him, Whence knowest thou me? Jesus answered and said unto him, Before that Philip called thee, when thou wast under the fig tree, I saw thee. Nathanael answered and saith unto him, Rabbi, thou art the Son of God; thou art the King of Israel. Jesus answered and said unto him, Because I said unto thee, I saw thee under the fig tree, believest thou? thou shalt see greater things than these. And he saith unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Hereafter ye shall see heaven open, and the angels of God ascending and descending upon the Son of man. And the third day there was a marriage in Cana of Galilee; and the mother of Jesus was there: And both Jesus was called, and his disciples, to the marriage. And when they wanted wine, the mother of Jesus saith unto him, They have no wine. Jesus saith unto her, Woman, what have I to do with thee? mine hour is not yet come. His mother saith unto the servants, Whatsoever he saith unto you, do it. And there were set there six waterpots of stone, after the manner of the purifying of the Jews, containing two or three firkins apiece. Jesus saith unto them, Fill the waterpots with water. And they filled them up to the brim. And he saith unto them, Draw out now, and bear unto the governor of the feast. And they bare it. When the ruler of the feast had tasted the water that was made wine, and knew not whence it was: (but the servants which drew the water knew;) the governor of the feast called the bridegroom, And saith unto him, Every man at the beginning doth set forth good wine; and when men have well drunk, then that which is worse: but thou hast kept the good wine until now. This beginning of miracles did Jesus in Cana of Galilee, and manifested forth his glory; and his disciples believed on him. After this he went down to Capernaum, he, and his mother, and his brethren, and his disciples: and they continued there not many days. And the Jews' passover was at hand, and Jesus went up to Jerusalem, And found in the temple those that sold oxen and sheep and doves, and the changers of money sitting: And when he had made a scourge of small cords, he drove them all out of the temple, and the sheep, and the oxen; and poured out the changers' money, and overthrew the tables; And said unto them that sold doves, Take these things hence; make not my Father's house an house of merchandise. And his disciples remembered that it was written, The zeal of thine house hath eaten me up. Then answered the Jews and said unto him, What sign shewest thou unto us, seeing that thou doest these things? Jesus answered and said unto them, Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up. Then said the Jews, Forty and six years was this temple in building, and wilt thou rear it up in three days? But he spake of the temple of his body. When therefore he was risen from the dead, his disciples remembered that he had said this unto them; and they believed the scripture, and the word which Jesus had said. Now when he was in Jerusalem at the passover, in the feast day, many believed in his name, when they saw the miracles which he did. But Jesus did not commit himself unto them, because he knew all men, And needed not that any should testify of man: for he knew what was in man.» The Gospel of Jesus Christ - John - Chapter 1...

@peterpo9880

5 ай бұрын

An interruption of the gulf stream would cause the symptoms detailed in the video - northern Europe hit early and harder.

Finally a man covering this event that doesnt just want to tell me to not trust "mainstream science"

@johanisnotagamer

9 ай бұрын

What's the alternative science?

@abdulwakeel5598

9 ай бұрын

​@@johanisnotagamercommon sense science

@VladTheImpalerDracul

9 ай бұрын

​@johanisnotagamer We evolved from the bacteria off an aliens finger nails. Left over in a bag of alien dorritos.

@allisonmclemore3860

9 ай бұрын

@@abdulwakeel5598 Conspiracy science

@abdulwakeel5598

9 ай бұрын

@@allisonmclemore3860 compromised science

It’s always a treat when North02 posts! Thank you for all you do!

@Jakub-kw1rx

8 ай бұрын

«In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. The same was in the beginning with God. All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made. In him was life; and the life was the light of men. And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not. There was a man sent from God, whose name was John. The same came for a witness, to bear witness of the Light, that all men through him might believe. He was not that Light, but was sent to bear witness of that Light. That was the true Light, which lighteth every man that cometh into the world. He was in the world, and the world was made by him, and the world knew him not. He came unto his own, and his own received him not. But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name: Which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God. And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth. John bare witness of him, and cried, saying, This was he of whom I spake, He that cometh after me is preferred before me: for he was before me. And of his fulness have all we received, and grace for grace. For the law was given by Moses, but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ. No man hath seen God at any time; the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him. And this is the record of John, when the Jews sent priests and Levites from Jerusalem to ask him, Who art thou? And he confessed, and denied not; but confessed, I am not the Christ. And they asked him, What then? Art thou Elias? And he saith, I am not. Art thou that prophet? And he answered, No. Then said they unto him, Who art thou? that we may give an answer to them that sent us. What sayest thou of thyself? He said, I am the voice of one crying in the wilderness, Make straight the way of the Lord, as said the prophet Esaias. And they which were sent were of the Pharisees. And they asked him, and said unto him, Why baptizest thou then, if thou be not that Christ, nor Elias, neither that prophet? John answered them, saying, I baptize with water: but there standeth one among you, whom ye know not; He it is, who coming after me is preferred before me, whose shoe's latchet I am not worthy to unloose. These things were done in Bethabara beyond Jordan, where John was baptizing. The next day John seeth Jesus coming unto him, and saith, Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world. This is he of whom I said, After me cometh a man which is preferred before me: for he was before me. And I knew him not: but that he should be made manifest to Israel, therefore am I come baptizing with water. And John bare record, saying, I saw the Spirit descending from heaven like a dove, and it abode upon him. And I knew him not: but he that sent me to baptize with water, the same said unto me, Upon whom thou shalt see the Spirit descending, and remaining on him, the same is he which baptizeth with the Holy Ghost. And I saw, and bare record that this is the Son of God. Again the next day after John stood, and two of his disciples; And looking upon Jesus as he walked, he saith, Behold the Lamb of God! And the two disciples heard him speak, and they followed Jesus. Then Jesus turned, and saw them following, and saith unto them, What seek ye? They said unto him, Rabbi, (which is to say, being interpreted, Master,) where dwellest thou? He saith unto them, Come and see. They came and saw where he dwelt, and abode with him that day: for it was about the tenth hour. One of the two which heard John speak, and followed him, was Andrew, Simon Peter's brother. He first findeth his own brother Simon, and saith unto him, We have found the Messias, which is, being interpreted, the Christ. And he brought him to Jesus. And when Jesus beheld him, he said, Thou art Simon the son of Jona: thou shalt be called Cephas, which is by interpretation, A stone. The day following Jesus would go forth into Galilee, and findeth Philip, and saith unto him, Follow me. Now Philip was of Bethsaida, the city of Andrew and Peter. Philip findeth Nathanael, and saith unto him, We have found him, of whom Moses in the law, and the prophets, did write, Jesus of Nazareth, the son of Joseph. And Nathanael said unto him, Can there any good thing come out of Nazareth? Philip saith unto him, Come and see. Jesus saw Nathanael coming to him, and saith of him, Behold an Israelite indeed, in whom is no guile! Nathanael saith unto him, Whence knowest thou me? Jesus answered and said unto him, Before that Philip called thee, when thou wast under the fig tree, I saw thee. Nathanael answered and saith unto him, Rabbi, thou art the Son of God; thou art the King of Israel. Jesus answered and said unto him, Because I said unto thee, I saw thee under the fig tree, believest thou? thou shalt see greater things than these. And he saith unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Hereafter ye shall see heaven open, and the angels of God ascending and descending upon the Son of man. And the third day there was a marriage in Cana of Galilee; and the mother of Jesus was there: And both Jesus was called, and his disciples, to the marriage. And when they wanted wine, the mother of Jesus saith unto him, They have no wine. Jesus saith unto her, Woman, what have I to do with thee? mine hour is not yet come. His mother saith unto the servants, Whatsoever he saith unto you, do it. And there were set there six waterpots of stone, after the manner of the purifying of the Jews, containing two or three firkins apiece. Jesus saith unto them, Fill the waterpots with water. And they filled them up to the brim. And he saith unto them, Draw out now, and bear unto the governor of the feast. And they bare it. When the ruler of the feast had tasted the water that was made wine, and knew not whence it was: (but the servants which drew the water knew;) the governor of the feast called the bridegroom, And saith unto him, Every man at the beginning doth set forth good wine; and when men have well drunk, then that which is worse: but thou hast kept the good wine until now. This beginning of miracles did Jesus in Cana of Galilee, and manifested forth his glory; and his disciples believed on him. After this he went down to Capernaum, he, and his mother, and his brethren, and his disciples: and they continued there not many days. And the Jews' passover was at hand, and Jesus went up to Jerusalem, And found in the temple those that sold oxen and sheep and doves, and the changers of money sitting: And when he had made a scourge of small cords, he drove them all out of the temple, and the sheep, and the oxen; and poured out the changers' money, and overthrew the tables; And said unto them that sold doves, Take these things hence; make not my Father's house an house of merchandise. And his disciples remembered that it was written, The zeal of thine house hath eaten me up. Then answered the Jews and said unto him, What sign shewest thou unto us, seeing that thou doest these things? Jesus answered and said unto them, Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up. Then said the Jews, Forty and six years was this temple in building, and wilt thou rear it up in three days? But he spake of the temple of his body. When therefore he was risen from the dead, his disciples remembered that he had said this unto them; and they believed the scripture, and the word which Jesus had said. Now when he was in Jerusalem at the passover, in the feast day, many believed in his name, when they saw the miracles which he did. But Jesus did not commit himself unto them, because he knew all men, And needed not that any should testify of man: for he knew what was in man.» The Gospel of Jesus Christ - John - Chapter 1...

I have viewed all of Randall Carlson's discussions on this era of time with an open mind. He still makes a great deal of sense to me. I find your treatise quite interesting.

@mver191

2 ай бұрын

Younger Dryas.

Thank you, North02, for doing these indepth videos! I finally get a quiet moment to sit and watch this one. Life has been ... erratic and painful for me lately. I'm actually watching it more than once, and pausing it to take notes and look stuff up. Thats what I do when I really enjoy videos where I get to learn things! On a totally unrelated (but very important) note, please, please, everyone, take time to tell your loved ones you love them EVERY chance you get. Tomorrow is not a given; you're never promised the next sunrise. ~ ~ ~ ~ "And don't let it break your heart. I know it feels hopeless sometimes. But they're never really gone as long as there's a memory in your mind." _Hold On To Memories_ Dave Draiman, Disturbed 💔💔 07 Jan 1984 - 02 Aug 2023 Rest in Peace, Matthew. Momma will miss you every day of the rest of my life!

My version of the Impact theory is many, smaller impacts into the ice sheets, where some water is vaporized, and some melted. When a puddle of liquid water forms on an ice sheet, there's a runaway effect, because water absorbs sunlight and heats up, unlike ice, which reflects sunlight. Our solar system's path of movement around the galaxy takes 220 million years to fully orbit, so we're always cruising through different cosmic neighborhoods, with other Celestial objects moving along different paths- sometimes that means we get slammed into a debris field. On a side note, i wonder how much the ocean conveyor belt currents-system would be messed up by countless massive chunks of ice suddenly littering the north Atlantic? Maybe a sudden cold snap followed by runaway warming?

Bear in mind that Rome is at the same latitude as NYC... Europe ows it's mild winters to the Gulf stream constantly bringing warm water from the gulf of Mexico to northern Europe. (Norway is just as far north as Alaska! And even Scotland is farther north than most of Manitoba!)

NOBODY WANTS TO TALK ABOUT THE OLDER DRYAS, SMH

@kckc4955

9 ай бұрын

Ageism! Lololol

@capn3ll176

8 ай бұрын

When you get to be a certain age, nobody notices you anymore

@jamesnewbury6354

7 ай бұрын

Or you just go there nah sayin

@markberman6708

7 ай бұрын

Well, it's the middle dryas that always really gets ignored, oldest and youngest get all the attention.

@phdtobe

7 ай бұрын

Out with the old. In with the new!

Nice work. Nicely employed skepticism and avoidance of speculation. This is how the facts should be presented.

@dcpack

9 ай бұрын

Facts? Actually mostly speculation. When ever you use proxies you can only speculate. Without first hand information nothing can be presented as facts. THAT is a distortion of science and scientific thinking. Probabilities are all that exist, to various degrees.

@BEDLAMITE-5280ft.

9 ай бұрын

Agreed.

@tonyadamson641

9 ай бұрын

There is nothing wrong with speculation as long as it is presented as such and doesn't ignore facts.

@Jakub-kw1rx

8 ай бұрын

«In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. The same was in the beginning with God. All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made. In him was life; and the life was the light of men. And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not. There was a man sent from God, whose name was John. The same came for a witness, to bear witness of the Light, that all men through him might believe. He was not that Light, but was sent to bear witness of that Light. That was the true Light, which lighteth every man that cometh into the world. He was in the world, and the world was made by him, and the world knew him not. He came unto his own, and his own received him not. But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name: Which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God. And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth. John bare witness of him, and cried, saying, This was he of whom I spake, He that cometh after me is preferred before me: for he was before me. And of his fulness have all we received, and grace for grace. For the law was given by Moses, but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ. No man hath seen God at any time; the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him. And this is the record of John, when the Jews sent priests and Levites from Jerusalem to ask him, Who art thou? And he confessed, and denied not; but confessed, I am not the Christ. And they asked him, What then? Art thou Elias? And he saith, I am not. Art thou that prophet? And he answered, No. Then said they unto him, Who art thou? that we may give an answer to them that sent us. What sayest thou of thyself? He said, I am the voice of one crying in the wilderness, Make straight the way of the Lord, as said the prophet Esaias. And they which were sent were of the Pharisees. And they asked him, and said unto him, Why baptizest thou then, if thou be not that Christ, nor Elias, neither that prophet? John answered them, saying, I baptize with water: but there standeth one among you, whom ye know not; He it is, who coming after me is preferred before me, whose shoe's latchet I am not worthy to unloose. These things were done in Bethabara beyond Jordan, where John was baptizing. The next day John seeth Jesus coming unto him, and saith, Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world. This is he of whom I said, After me cometh a man which is preferred before me: for he was before me. And I knew him not: but that he should be made manifest to Israel, therefore am I come baptizing with water. And John bare record, saying, I saw the Spirit descending from heaven like a dove, and it abode upon him. And I knew him not: but he that sent me to baptize with water, the same said unto me, Upon whom thou shalt see the Spirit descending, and remaining on him, the same is he which baptizeth with the Holy Ghost. And I saw, and bare record that this is the Son of God. Again the next day after John stood, and two of his disciples; And looking upon Jesus as he walked, he saith, Behold the Lamb of God! And the two disciples heard him speak, and they followed Jesus. Then Jesus turned, and saw them following, and saith unto them, What seek ye? They said unto him, Rabbi, (which is to say, being interpreted, Master,) where dwellest thou? He saith unto them, Come and see. They came and saw where he dwelt, and abode with him that day: for it was about the tenth hour. One of the two which heard John speak, and followed him, was Andrew, Simon Peter's brother. He first findeth his own brother Simon, and saith unto him, We have found the Messias, which is, being interpreted, the Christ. And he brought him to Jesus. And when Jesus beheld him, he said, Thou art Simon the son of Jona: thou shalt be called Cephas, which is by interpretation, A stone. The day following Jesus would go forth into Galilee, and findeth Philip, and saith unto him, Follow me. Now Philip was of Bethsaida, the city of Andrew and Peter. Philip findeth Nathanael, and saith unto him, We have found him, of whom Moses in the law, and the prophets, did write, Jesus of Nazareth, the son of Joseph. And Nathanael said unto him, Can there any good thing come out of Nazareth? Philip saith unto him, Come and see. Jesus saw Nathanael coming to him, and saith of him, Behold an Israelite indeed, in whom is no guile! Nathanael saith unto him, Whence knowest thou me? Jesus answered and said unto him, Before that Philip called thee, when thou wast under the fig tree, I saw thee. Nathanael answered and saith unto him, Rabbi, thou art the Son of God; thou art the King of Israel. Jesus answered and said unto him, Because I said unto thee, I saw thee under the fig tree, believest thou? thou shalt see greater things than these. And he saith unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Hereafter ye shall see heaven open, and the angels of God ascending and descending upon the Son of man. And the third day there was a marriage in Cana of Galilee; and the mother of Jesus was there: And both Jesus was called, and his disciples, to the marriage. And when they wanted wine, the mother of Jesus saith unto him, They have no wine. Jesus saith unto her, Woman, what have I to do with thee? mine hour is not yet come. His mother saith unto the servants, Whatsoever he saith unto you, do it. And there were set there six waterpots of stone, after the manner of the purifying of the Jews, containing two or three firkins apiece. Jesus saith unto them, Fill the waterpots with water. And they filled them up to the brim. And he saith unto them, Draw out now, and bear unto the governor of the feast. And they bare it. When the ruler of the feast had tasted the water that was made wine, and knew not whence it was: (but the servants which drew the water knew;) the governor of the feast called the bridegroom, And saith unto him, Every man at the beginning doth set forth good wine; and when men have well drunk, then that which is worse: but thou hast kept the good wine until now. This beginning of miracles did Jesus in Cana of Galilee, and manifested forth his glory; and his disciples believed on him. After this he went down to Capernaum, he, and his mother, and his brethren, and his disciples: and they continued there not many days. And the Jews' passover was at hand, and Jesus went up to Jerusalem, And found in the temple those that sold oxen and sheep and doves, and the changers of money sitting: And when he had made a scourge of small cords, he drove them all out of the temple, and the sheep, and the oxen; and poured out the changers' money, and overthrew the tables; And said unto them that sold doves, Take these things hence; make not my Father's house an house of merchandise. And his disciples remembered that it was written, The zeal of thine house hath eaten me up. Then answered the Jews and said unto him, What sign shewest thou unto us, seeing that thou doest these things? Jesus answered and said unto them, Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up. Then said the Jews, Forty and six years was this temple in building, and wilt thou rear it up in three days? But he spake of the temple of his body. When therefore he was risen from the dead, his disciples remembered that he had said this unto them; and they believed the scripture, and the word which Jesus had said. Now when he was in Jerusalem at the passover, in the feast day, many believed in his name, when they saw the miracles which he did. But Jesus did not commit himself unto them, because he knew all men, And needed not that any should testify of man: for he knew what was in man.» The Gospel of Jesus Christ - John - Chapter 1...

@tracyobrien2816

8 ай бұрын

Thank you EVER so much, North02...

I grew up in whats now the lake bed of Agassiz, i always appreciate its majesty and impact being mentioned. I feel like it is often ignored or forgotten!

For people like you that do videos like this, it would be much appreciated if you'd spend more that a few minutes regarding the ice cores. I'd like to see an in-depth narrative on how ice cores are currently interpreted and how sure we are of those interpretations. OR, if you know of any videos that do what I'm describing, provide links. Many thanks and thumbs up.

@knickyak7268

4 ай бұрын

Randle Carlson latest video goes into ice cores ! Or is Randle Carlson off limits ?

Milankovitch cycle is a fact. Combined with certain conditions on Earth, it might have different climate consequences for each particular point in time. And local variation effects on fauna and humans. Most likely, an extra terrestrial object hit the ice sheet in North America at some point, causing temporarily, massive flooding - but not to the extent it would have had any global effect, as pointed out in this great video. Thanks for sharing.

Great job on this!! I especially appreciate how much detail you go into about the chronology of the onset of the YD across the world. Very meticulous work. I really appreciate getting a chance to look at the script as well.

@Jakub-kw1rx

8 ай бұрын

«In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. The same was in the beginning with God. All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made. In him was life; and the life was the light of men. And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not. There was a man sent from God, whose name was John. The same came for a witness, to bear witness of the Light, that all men through him might believe. He was not that Light, but was sent to bear witness of that Light. That was the true Light, which lighteth every man that cometh into the world. He was in the world, and the world was made by him, and the world knew him not. He came unto his own, and his own received him not. But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name: Which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God. And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth. John bare witness of him, and cried, saying, This was he of whom I spake, He that cometh after me is preferred before me: for he was before me. And of his fulness have all we received, and grace for grace. For the law was given by Moses, but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ. No man hath seen God at any time; the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him. And this is the record of John, when the Jews sent priests and Levites from Jerusalem to ask him, Who art thou? And he confessed, and denied not; but confessed, I am not the Christ. And they asked him, What then? Art thou Elias? And he saith, I am not. Art thou that prophet? And he answered, No. Then said they unto him, Who art thou? that we may give an answer to them that sent us. What sayest thou of thyself? He said, I am the voice of one crying in the wilderness, Make straight the way of the Lord, as said the prophet Esaias. And they which were sent were of the Pharisees. And they asked him, and said unto him, Why baptizest thou then, if thou be not that Christ, nor Elias, neither that prophet? John answered them, saying, I baptize with water: but there standeth one among you, whom ye know not; He it is, who coming after me is preferred before me, whose shoe's latchet I am not worthy to unloose. These things were done in Bethabara beyond Jordan, where John was baptizing. The next day John seeth Jesus coming unto him, and saith, Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world. This is he of whom I said, After me cometh a man which is preferred before me: for he was before me. And I knew him not: but that he should be made manifest to Israel, therefore am I come baptizing with water. And John bare record, saying, I saw the Spirit descending from heaven like a dove, and it abode upon him. And I knew him not: but he that sent me to baptize with water, the same said unto me, Upon whom thou shalt see the Spirit descending, and remaining on him, the same is he which baptizeth with the Holy Ghost. And I saw, and bare record that this is the Son of God. Again the next day after John stood, and two of his disciples; And looking upon Jesus as he walked, he saith, Behold the Lamb of God! And the two disciples heard him speak, and they followed Jesus. Then Jesus turned, and saw them following, and saith unto them, What seek ye? They said unto him, Rabbi, (which is to say, being interpreted, Master,) where dwellest thou? He saith unto them, Come and see. They came and saw where he dwelt, and abode with him that day: for it was about the tenth hour. One of the two which heard John speak, and followed him, was Andrew, Simon Peter's brother. He first findeth his own brother Simon, and saith unto him, We have found the Messias, which is, being interpreted, the Christ. And he brought him to Jesus. And when Jesus beheld him, he said, Thou art Simon the son of Jona: thou shalt be called Cephas, which is by interpretation, A stone. The day following Jesus would go forth into Galilee, and findeth Philip, and saith unto him, Follow me. Now Philip was of Bethsaida, the city of Andrew and Peter. Philip findeth Nathanael, and saith unto him, We have found him, of whom Moses in the law, and the prophets, did write, Jesus of Nazareth, the son of Joseph. And Nathanael said unto him, Can there any good thing come out of Nazareth? Philip saith unto him, Come and see. Jesus saw Nathanael coming to him, and saith of him, Behold an Israelite indeed, in whom is no guile! Nathanael saith unto him, Whence knowest thou me? Jesus answered and said unto him, Before that Philip called thee, when thou wast under the fig tree, I saw thee. Nathanael answered and saith unto him, Rabbi, thou art the Son of God; thou art the King of Israel. Jesus answered and said unto him, Because I said unto thee, I saw thee under the fig tree, believest thou? thou shalt see greater things than these. And he saith unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Hereafter ye shall see heaven open, and the angels of God ascending and descending upon the Son of man. And the third day there was a marriage in Cana of Galilee; and the mother of Jesus was there: And both Jesus was called, and his disciples, to the marriage. And when they wanted wine, the mother of Jesus saith unto him, They have no wine. Jesus saith unto her, Woman, what have I to do with thee? mine hour is not yet come. His mother saith unto the servants, Whatsoever he saith unto you, do it. And there were set there six waterpots of stone, after the manner of the purifying of the Jews, containing two or three firkins apiece. Jesus saith unto them, Fill the waterpots with water. And they filled them up to the brim. And he saith unto them, Draw out now, and bear unto the governor of the feast. And they bare it. When the ruler of the feast had tasted the water that was made wine, and knew not whence it was: (but the servants which drew the water knew;) the governor of the feast called the bridegroom, And saith unto him, Every man at the beginning doth set forth good wine; and when men have well drunk, then that which is worse: but thou hast kept the good wine until now. This beginning of miracles did Jesus in Cana of Galilee, and manifested forth his glory; and his disciples believed on him. After this he went down to Capernaum, he, and his mother, and his brethren, and his disciples: and they continued there not many days. And the Jews' passover was at hand, and Jesus went up to Jerusalem, And found in the temple those that sold oxen and sheep and doves, and the changers of money sitting: And when he had made a scourge of small cords, he drove them all out of the temple, and the sheep, and the oxen; and poured out the changers' money, and overthrew the tables; And said unto them that sold doves, Take these things hence; make not my Father's house an house of merchandise. And his disciples remembered that it was written, The zeal of thine house hath eaten me up. Then answered the Jews and said unto him, What sign shewest thou unto us, seeing that thou doest these things? Jesus answered and said unto them, Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up. Then said the Jews, Forty and six years was this temple in building, and wilt thou rear it up in three days? But he spake of the temple of his body. When therefore he was risen from the dead, his disciples remembered that he had said this unto them; and they believed the scripture, and the word which Jesus had said. Now when he was in Jerusalem at the passover, in the feast day, many believed in his name, when they saw the miracles which he did. But Jesus did not commit himself unto them, because he knew all men, And needed not that any should testify of man: for he knew what was in man.» The Gospel of Jesus Christ - John - Chapter 1...

@tylerkiley7090

8 ай бұрын

@TheTel and @North02 need to come together a Gogeta of sorts!

It is possible that the planet slightly shifted its axis during cooler periods, making the south hemisphere to be more perpendicular to the sun rays, and the north hemisphere to be less, so temperatures become cooler in the north and warmer in the south.

Wow...I have to admit that the impact theory of an all world ending of a highly developed ancient civilization and our rebounding of a more primitive kind was intriguing. I caught on in your early discussion of climate change and its causes. This was a very well sequentially presented learning experience.

@kalrandom7387

9 ай бұрын

If there was any time. Of advanced civilization it would have had to been before 50,000 years ago when humanity went through a bottleneck dropping to 10,000 people worldwide

@cg9612

9 ай бұрын

I would like to learn more about the bottleneck time.

@zacharyshort384

9 ай бұрын

@@cg9612 This is essentially Graham Hancocks theory, so if you're interested in this I'd suggest watching his appearances on Joe Rogan's Podcast. Especially with Randal Carlson. This is highly controversial territory, but it's interesting none the less.

@swirvinbirds1971

9 ай бұрын

​@@zacharyshort384I always find it funny when a journalist and an architect claim to be scholars on Geology. Randall is the worst. One of his latest clown show claims is the Palouse Loess is the fallout from his proposed impact. 😂

@zacharyshort384

9 ай бұрын

@@swirvinbirds1971 Thanks for sharing with the class.

My father is a retired geology professor at Cornell and recently I've been in a long drawn out conversation with a friend about the Younger Dryas, the "flood" and other pseudoscience theories in a similar vein, and this is EXACTLY what I need to show him, not that it'll do much if any good. These religious types have a distorted sense of how geological processes and science works and they ignore whatever doesn't fit into their cataclysm, young Earth, and worldwide flood ideas. It's frustrating, and I type slow! Thanks for the PERFECT video to show him that breaks what we know from scientific study and observation down and discusses the Younger Dryas in detail. I couldn't have described it anywhere as well as you!

@micahfoley9572

9 ай бұрын

You ever heard of street epistemology? You might find it a useful tool for your toolbox if you're trying to save your friend from all that craziness. It's a bit like the socratic method, but without the logic traps and potential for confrontation. It requires a fair bit of patience, but it's a great way to trigger badly needed introspection in people who claim to care that their beliefs are true, but who don't do the work to make that true. (Or don't know how to.) There's tons of demos and tutorials about it in KZread if you ever feel like you've hit a wall with your friend and need a new tack. Good luck. :)

@jturtle5318

9 ай бұрын

There must have been catastrophic flooding when the glaciers melted. There are remains of settlements in the English channel, called Doggerland, and under the Black Sea. It must have seemed like the end of the world, and for many people living along the now drowned coasts, it was.

@hedgehog3180

9 ай бұрын

@@jturtle5318 Unless you are a tree the “flooding” wouldn't have been catastrophic at all when sea level rise was only a few cm a year since you can simply y'know move. Also Doggerlands isn't in the English channel it's in the North Sea between England and Denmark, the location of the Dogger Banks for which it is named after. The settlements we've found there were simply abandoned, nothing dramatic.

@para59r

6 ай бұрын

Best to lay off dad. This guy didn't even talk about solar effects on climate and there are several good theories on solar cycles out there not to mention new migration studies demonstrating people moving toward southern climes from near the artic circle and there are comparative myths, language and DNA studies not to mention new site studies to back it up (Alaskan Land Bridge Occupation find one of the more recent and well known). This guys talk was void of much and I don't even know who this Hedgcock guy is, but artic theories didn't start with him, they are over a hundred years old, but such does not support the Climate Scam and likely will disrupt Fertile Crescent and Biblical origin theories which is totally persona non grata for both and have been since Britain was kicked out of her colony.

Love everything this channel puts out, always so interesting to listen to and learn about

Yeah well something happened roughly 13k years ago that killed off a significant number of species. These species survived much harsher climatic events than the Younger Dryas. There was no way a thinly settled human population wiped out that many species either. Not just mammoth species, slow moving and slow to reproduce, but also fast moving and breeding species like multiple types of horses. I am still waiting for a hypothesis that fits that observed fact. They all went extinct in too short a time frame for it to be anything but catastrophic.

@chuckleezodiac24

8 ай бұрын

various megafauna species went extinct at various rates of speed in various locations throughout the world. from about 50,000 to 10,000 years ago about 100 genera of megafauna went extinct worldwide. is that "too short a time?" mammoths coexisted with humans in North America until 5,000 years ago. some mammoths survived on Wrangel Island until 4,000 years ago.

@deborahbennett6544

7 ай бұрын

Read Velikovsky, he uses the research of a wide range of scientists to show there was more than one global catastrophe , the last one in 800BC.

Okay, on the "no evidence in Japan thing," ... sea levels were 393 feet lower- so all the coastal inhabitants are under water, along with any evidence of their tools and homes. Coastal regions are where most people would've lived, just like today, especially on an island.

This was one of the most reasoned, well-presented, beautifully produced, balanced treatments of the YD and YDIT on KZread. Well Done!

What's always missing about the Younger Dryas and Ice Age conditions is where CO2 levels were. And mostly, what is the response of C3 pathway plants to these low CO2 times. The C3 plants like all trees and bushes and many grasses like wheat and barley just do not do too well in times when CO2 levels are below 250 ppm. When CO2 levels are below 250 ppm, it is also likely to be much dryer with precipitation lower by 6.0%/1C change in temperature. So, the colder times are also dryer. When CO2 levels are below 250 ppm, the stomata on C3 plants open larger to bring in more CO2 which allow more water to be transpired from the C3 plants. That means, when it is dryer with low CO2 levels, the C3 plants suffer from not enough precipitation. They suffer so much that they just do not grow very well or even reproduce that well. The trees, bushes, and many grasses just die out and they are mostly gone from the environment. The Younger Dryas was one of these periods. The plants that did really well was the C4 pathway grasses. The herbivores that could eat C4 grasses did really well. Humans were forced to either hunt and eat these herbivores or go back to eating grasses like one of our earlier ancestors (robust australopithecines) did (during one and two of the ice age conditions 2.7M to 2.2M forced australs into. Human ancestors had to either eat herbivores or grass. One branch went after the grasses and one went after the herbivores.) When the Younger Dryas ended, CO2 levels went back up and the trees, bushes and wheat and barley came back. The C4 grass herbivores died out because that grass wasn't around as much and they didn't eat trees and bushes, they ate grass. Humans noticed the C3 wild wheat and barley was growing really well (probably for the first time in 1,000 years) and they started harvesting it. Agriculture for the first time in 100,000 years. Before that, there was a short period of the Natufians about 14,000 years ago, but the Younger Dryas ended that. So the Mega-Fauna depended on C4 grasses which only grew really well when it was colder and CO2 levels were below 250 ppm. The Mega-Fauna died out at 14,000 years ago and then 11,000 years ago at periods when CO2 went above 250 ppm.

Great subject. So interesting! The images used are breathtaking! What a beautiful world we live on. And, schools need to teach more geology! Our kids learned about the carbon cycle, nitrogen cycle, water cycle in fifth grade! They learned about ocean currents and sun cycles and lots of other great stuff!

I like that you took the time at the end to point out the harm of pseudoscience and I hope you make more videos taking about it.

While nomadic groups won't really have a huge problem with sealevels rising they still would notice it (maybe even more easily - as an entrance to a cave might be above water in one year and below sea level 5years later....they may just move to another cave without any problem, the older individuals would certainly tell stories about the "old cave" 500yards away that they played in as a kid - now under water!)

Love your thoughtful and thoroughly researched content, super imofrmative. I never even realised that most of the talk about the Younger Dryas that I've heard was from creationists and ancient aliens types in regards to the impact hypothesis! Good to finally have someone go through various papers looking critically at the idea rather than simply going with "wow sounds more interesting than alternatives". Great work, NORTH02!

@justmenotyou3151

9 ай бұрын

Creationists are a poision to christanty and science. Thats all I can say about that politely.

I appreciate you calling out the pseudoscience. The amount of it has exploded recently and it's so unfortunate. Thank you!!

@xkguy

9 ай бұрын

The reason there is so much 'pseudoscience' is that academia has lost its way. At this point in history we each must look at the data and chose our guru carefully. The author has a severe leftist bias. I suggest broadening the scope of the reference material.

@Spengleman2

9 ай бұрын

@@xkguyI don’t think it’s political so much as personal. People have built their lives and careers around beliefs that they need to protect, it’s like protecting a loved one. The best voices to listen to in my opinion, are voices that are well informed, but who also keep an open mind to alternative theories, and who frequently change their mind about things. People who refuse to change their mind in the face of new evidence, are almost guaranteed to be wrong. Same applies to those who silence others. We must keep all possibilities on the table, otherwise we’re bound to be made fools of given enough time.

@jeffreydevon5665

9 ай бұрын

I believe Gallilao would have fallen under pseudo science at the time !I try to look at ( the possibility of " until proven otherwise with multi million $ grants on the line who knows , its the possibility of !

@_MikeJon_

9 ай бұрын

@@xkguy Your political leanings are irrelevant when people think giants or Atlantians built the pyramids. It's also irrelevant when stupid af claims are made by people like Graham Hancock or Bright insight that have half baked ideas. Literally the bulk of their arguments are strawman fallacies coupled with misrepresenting data. The fact you called him a "leftist" is just as ignorant and a non argument. That's saying a lot coming from me; I'm a gun carrying pro American pro freedom as they come. Make actual arguments next time.

@_MikeJon_

9 ай бұрын

@@jeffreydevon5665 No he wasn't considered "pseudoscience" that's objectively false. You're really trying to compare the inquisition of the 1600s with this conversation? Sorry but that's ridiculous.

I'm a 3rd generation dweller of the channeled scablands in E washington. It's more central washington. Anyways Dry falls State park is one the 100 top geological wonders in the world. It was home to the larges waterfall to ever exist in the world. Cool area to research.

Great job with this. One of your best. Thank you for your work.

Imagine life back then.. wow. Awe inspiring respect to our ancestors.

North02 is a beacon of light on the net. And i mean by that he's unbiased and presents every thing with a grain of salt. I can tell you like what you do and are pretty good at it.

what's the music which was played in the outro? i'd like to know =3 also, a very interesting video on the younger dryas. its not a topic i hear much of so it was cool to learn !!

Thank you for the video ... We need so many points of information to try to understand what our ancestors went thru... My God ... They were a tough group of people !!!!! Old saying "A flutter of the Butterfly's wing caused great changes" Many different earth and off world small changes may have started a cascade of events which ended in the Younger Dryas ...

Brilliant video yet again. Its a good day when North02 post. Thank you ❤

I have followed this subject for 40 plus years and I have never heard how different the cooling was so different in time and severity around the world. Thanks!! I had been wondering about the variation of mass extinctions around the world, from the period of the extinctions of the animals at the Labrea tar pits.

@hedgehog3180

9 ай бұрын

A lot of this has to do with the effects of imperialism, which have left the global south understudied so we simply didn't know about the variance until efforts were made to collect more geographically diverse data.

@sebastienloyer9471

4 ай бұрын

Suspicious observers videos series on KZread. Insightful

What an excellent video! My sincere thanks. FWVLIW: My hunch is that the Younger Dryas was for the most part no more than a transient consequence of a rapid warming trend at the start of this last interglacial, as suggested by it being far from a singular event. We ascribe it significance primarily because it's the most recent and so 'best' documented example, while being of most (recent) relevance to us. Somewhat associated events may each be examples of coincidence or causation. In short I would suggest much of the significance 'we' ascribe to the Younger Dryas likely says more about 'us' than provable reality - think seeing familiar objects in clouds.

I’m so excited you have a new video! About to watch now!

yeah!!!!! The thrill when i see that a new video from North 02 is in the list!

Well done! This topic has been discussed by many people & you're doing a good job explaining the details....I'm only 2:00 minutes into the video 📹, but so far so good 👍

Sea level rise is currently around 4.5 mm per year not 3 to 4 cm. And we are in the last 10,000 years of the warming peek of the 100,000 year Milanković cycle. So sea levels have been generally rising since the last minimum. The YD was a slight bump on this cycle and apparently had focused regional affects. However, sea levels were impacted and both lowered and rose because of it. It’s likely that some of the sea rise today (4.5 mm per year) can be attributed to both the YD and Milankovic cycle. Solar intensity and atmospheric carbon likely has smaller affects, today. It’s very likely that the YD was caused by Atlantic Ocean currents changing over hundreds of years. Although it’s also likely that other events were also factors in this relatively short cooling cycle (1000 years or so). It’s funny how the UN has changed the definition of climate change to human caused. Especially since most of the climate change history of the planet occurred when no humans or human like species existed. It’s all gotten way too political rather than fact based.

@allie1953

8 ай бұрын

Many definitions and words are conveniently being changed these days...

Another fascinating documentary. Thanks, NORTH 02. Look forward to more on this topic.

Gorgeous work yet again! Thank you!

This was a really interesting video. Thanks!

North 02 always has the best content. It’s always so clearly well researched and presented. This one must have been particularly difficult with how much research must have gone into it. Plus it’s pretty amazing that an almost 45 min video on a subject that could have easily been a dull recitation of facts, was instead fascinating from start to finish. All that’s to say, thanks North 02, for all your hard work and for covering ALL the facts.

Been here since the start bro, love your growth!

thank you NORTH 02. I found this very comprehensive and illuminating. I happen to live at the bottom of ancient Glacial Lake Missoula in Montana the source waters of many (not all) of those floods into the scablands of eastern Washington. I am especially interested in the floodings of the Snake and Salmon Rivers in relation of paleo native sites such as Cooper's Ferry. This was long before the Younger Dryas event but can see how the many factors causing fragmentation and dispersal of both people and animals was operating nearly constantly. Again, thank you.

A well researched and presented documentary, providing another aspect to past cataclysms. That said, your mentioning of Graham Hancock was interesting, as he is quite passionate, but then we shouldn't dismiss alternate perspectives, just because they are different.

@gravitonthongs1363

5 ай бұрын

Hypothesis should be based on evidence, not attraction to catastrophe.

@johncunningham8213

4 ай бұрын

Hancock is just asking questions. I don't understand why people have such a problem with that. How can we learn more if we don't allow people to ask questions?

@gravitonthongs1363

4 ай бұрын

@@johncunningham8213 because he makes false statements far more than he asks questions.

@johncunningham8213

4 ай бұрын

@@gravitonthongs1363 Do you have any examples?

@gravitonthongs1363

4 ай бұрын

@@johncunningham8213 “The pyramid were constructed using sound levitation” “The Carolina bays were formed by impact ejecta” “There are no megalithic constructions that predate Gobleki Teppe” Etc.

Fantastic video as always.❤

Delighted to have found your channel. Most educational. Thank you.

Thank-you for such a well researched program.

Thank you North!!!

You should have included or considered the cause and time frame of the Carolina Bays. Without them a conclusion cant be made as far as the north american land mass and melting of ice sheets .

@tonyadamson641

9 ай бұрын

The science on the bays is pretty conclusive IMO. I think the only real question is when did they occur. I notice that the bays are ignored quite often and I think they are a bit of "an inconvenient truth" within North American prehistory.

Now THIS is great KZread content. Thank you!

Outstanding work; as suggested by you: more please!

Top tier content

Wow the ending about the CRG was really intense

Why is there no mention of solar activity or the 12,000 years cycle?

So cool, thank you for this wonderful and relaxing learning experience - perfect copilot for Saturday chores

Thank you North02. We all have the opportunity to read our human history from the people by looking at the stones. There’s a complicated multi faceted style of art that goes unrecognized. It’s like 30 statues in one, migratory people cannot carry around several different Momentos to remind them of their culture and family. I don’t think anybody believes that they were not spiritual or caring people… They would not have survived otherwise. All those little hand sized rocks and crystals that just look like rocks: they are pieces of art, and were carried to the present locations.

@FacesintheStone

9 ай бұрын

26:58 We get to actually see what they wore, they were very stylish. No loincloth as depicted. We learned they were savages, but they did not know to say. ❤ I don’t think they would’ve made it and I don’t think we would’ve made it if that were true! 😮

Another amazing episode , i love how you focused on pseudoscience at the end , we see it everywhere these days.

Excellent job!!!! Love you careful, deliberate cadence going through the varied questions.... You did not mention the Carolina Bays???? ...very much enjoyed your takedown of the book-prostitutes, especially Hancock.

@justmenotyou3151

9 ай бұрын

No, he didn't mention carolina bays. Anthony Zamora has done a lot of convincing videos on those, Nebraska rainwater basin and the comet inpact hypothesis. Very convincing.

@hedgehog3180

9 ай бұрын

@@justmenotyou3151 I don't think you should base your beliefs on videos no matter how convincing they are.

@justmenotyou3151

9 ай бұрын

@hedgehog3180 That's where you start. Research from there. Read his book and check out the references. There is a lot of older work that is questionable. New information and technology should always be considered. Che k the arguments against the references and see if it pans out.

@Naturalook

9 ай бұрын

@@hedgehog3180 certainly a thing to be wary of, but not like were making medical decisions here. Just ‘cause we listen to this person, or that, doesn’t mean we don’t have a background to anchor from, either. In particular, the scientific community, geologists, anthropologists, etc., are divided on the younger dryas, both extent, and depth.

You make the absolute best videos on pre and ancient history .

Great video. I love that it took a global look, not just at one region or continent. I learned a lot. I have found Randall Carlson's Scablands videos interesting. But then I got a look at the ones with Graham Hancock included. Graham seems so defensive and out there. Frothingly so. Constantly saying he was just "a Reporter" and that he was being demonized. I wondered where were the known, legit scientists at to back him up? I put Graham on the back shelf, figuring time would prove him right or wrong with more research being done. I still watched Randall as he sounded more like a man who knew his stuff. But the more I watched him, the more odd duck characters and really out there conferences I noticed him associating with, the more of a sinking feeling I got in my gut. I do admit, his theories sound like they could be plausible to a person like myself. Enough that there could be something there that is right. But I take everything everyone says with a large grain of salt and realize that science is constantly learning new things. I do not hold too strongly to any one thing as a cold hard fact without a lot of proof. That being said. Randall has interested me in seeing some of the erosional landscapes he has visited for myself. They do look fascinating in and of themselves. So in the long run I do not regret listening to him, but he has left me feeling disappointed in him. Your videos are very enjoyable to watch and I thank you for doing them.

The sea-level rise would be noticeable over the course of a lifetime as formerly shallow areas become not-so-shallow.

@twonumber22

8 ай бұрын

It becomes noticable during the tides.

@qwertyuiopgarth

8 ай бұрын

@@twonumber22 More and more each year.

Awesome video! For anyone wanting to watch a takedown of graham Hancock, Stefan milo did 2 hour video a while back going over every episode

@Bliving457

9 ай бұрын

It was so good

@johntaplin3126

9 ай бұрын

I have no idea what caused the Younger Dryas, and nor does anyone else. While it is easy to knock any hypothesis, proving it is far more difficult, especially when the subject is the climate. I don't know what actual research either North02 or Milo have done personally, or are they quoting other's empirical evidence, if so the problem would be solved - it ain't, so no one has the answer, yet. The disappearance of the mega fauna is also to be solved, but there's no way it was caused by a bunch of natives with stone-pointed spears. Having lived half my ancient life in Africa, I have yet to see anyone taking on an elephant for food when better and easier animals are plentiful. One thing that can be said about Hancock is that he has spent more time in the field than pretty much anyone else, so calling him names is the a bit below the belt - and not very professiona, if that's what his detractors are claiming to be. So many paradigms have been blown about human history in the fairly recent past, it is a bit risky to put your head on the block - unless you can prove any claims beyond doubt. Just a few thoughts.

@hedgehog3180

9 ай бұрын

Miniminuteman has also done some takedowns.

Your productions continue to confirm that I did not make a mistake when I subscribed. Thanks.

Thank you for that really enjoyed it❤

Awesome! I’ve been waiting on someone who isn’t a conspiracy theorist or hack to cover the younger dryas :) great as always!

@MrPaytonw34

5 ай бұрын

Yeah, real grown-up thing to say

@knickyak7268

4 ай бұрын

Conspiracy is what , other observations that lean against the narrative and ingrained Academia ! Who just calls new evidence out of place artifacts , or conspiracy !

I do see some benefits of speculative science. Sometimes helps new theories - like feathered dinosaurs or large Mayan cities. On the other hand, it also brought us Ancient Aliens.....

@hedgehog3180

9 ай бұрын

The important difference is just whether someone is trying to sell their speculation as the truth or they just want to present neat ideas. “All Your Yesterdays” is for example very clear that it is just speculation meant to feed your imagination and see past animals as more lively than you probably do.

Sometimes I agree with the majority of scientific consensus but I don't have to agree to listen with an open mind. I've never felt it wise to listen to only one side of a story. Though I subscribed to your channel years ago, it's not just your hypothesis I concur with but I enjoy seeing your scientific methodology that brought you to those observations. Thank you for your channel I really enjoy your videos.

Now I'm thinking of writing science fiction where the megafauna extinction was caused by off-worlders on hunting safaris.

Yet another beautifully presented discussion. I have to say that I admire how you can remain calm and stick to facts when confronted with all the scammers out to make a buck with pseudoscience and waht amounts to pure fiction. The criminal distortion of science for the purposes of personal gain makes me so angry I want to club these con men with a nicely shaped stone axe! Just want to know how much you're excellent efforts to present this science is appreciated. As for Netflix and their ilk, well folks, you can't tell me you're "shohcked! Shocked I say!" to find commercial media engaging in scams for profit. Pretty much the modern business model.

@christian779

8 ай бұрын

Nothing you've said disproves those you disagree with. You claim pseudoscience without referencing a single source and you assume everything in this video is fact. If you're referring to Graham Hancocks documentary, he doesn't claim everything as fact, as you'd know if you had watched any of his interviews or read his books. There is no established fact as to the cause of the Younger Dryas, which is why it's heavily debated. Perhaps being open minded is the best cause of action?

@jackrice2770

8 ай бұрын

@@christian779 Wanna buy a bridge?

@christian779

8 ай бұрын

@jackrice2770 yes please

@adamstevens1083

8 ай бұрын

@@christian779 Doesn't claim anything as fact, but heavily implies, leads the viewer down the path of pseudoscience, and claims scientists are dogmatic and blind to new information when that is precisely the opposite intent of scientific inquiry. He's a conspiracy theorist and money-grubber.

@christian779

8 ай бұрын

@adamstevens1083 Just to make things clear, I don't buy everything he says but there's anomalies that current models cant explain and that's where my interest is. I'm always open minded, are you? Claiming something as fact when it's not proven is pseudoscience and you've just said he implies things but he doesn't claim things as fact, so I don't understand what you're saying? Intent is one thing but human nature is another. He references the geologist J Harlen Bretz, who did encounter dogma within his field, which is proof of dogma within science.

it always makes me happy when north 02 uploads =3

tyvm for the uploads 🦬🇨🇦🤟

Interesting documentary. However, regarding the Younger-Dryas's irregular impact behavior between the Northern and Southern hemispheres, it has been contemplated that perhaps a temporary shift in Earth's orbit was so sharp and oblique that during the northern hemisphere's summer, our planet was further away from the sun than it may have been the case for its southern counterpart...

Et al is the greatest mind of our time. He’s on every science paper nearly. Bravo enigmatic good sir…

I’m sitting here, in my living room watching this in mid July, Northumberland uk, wearing a jumper and a fleece... it’s 15oc, think I’d struggle a bit in the younger dryas 😂

As always, I love your work!

Excellent work and an exceptionally fascinating topic. Additionally, I enjoy listening to your voice.

Very interesting and informative. There is always so much more to learn. The mysteries of the past are so fascinating and I love to hear a new take on the story. I think researchers that keep an open mind are more credible, as there are always new discoveries to add to the story. In these times where so many now have access to great scientific studies available on the internet, it allows all of us to be researchers. If a theory is treated as fact it can now be analysed by anyone willing to put the time and find truth. The time of knowledge being an exclusive right of universities is long gone. If an open minded researcher goes against the current paradigm, it does not go down well. But shouldn't all those who research and find true facts have a seat at the table. I feel like there would be more progress if there was kind collaboration instead dismissal of any ideas that don't fit the current dogma. You could learn from each other and together help uncover the amazing story of the past. Name calling takes away from this otherwise great video.

@MrPaytonw34

5 ай бұрын

These guys don’t like to hear that. It’s only supposed to be a certain few people. Us common folk we’re not supposed to do any scientific work, or to bring up our own theory’s.

❤. One of my favourite channels.

Given current research, seems that our local star, in conjunction with notably regular cycling of the earth's magnetic poles and fields, had a significant influence in the Younger-Dryas. A pole shift along with a solar microwavable, can account for all of these anomalies.

Can't wait to watch. This is about to be a banger

I'm a quaternary geologist and I want to tell you that you've done a good job covering this complex subject.

@KibyNykraft

7 ай бұрын

On the contrary ,the content is quite sloppy. He doesn't know the databases of paleontology, geology and archeology. The impact theory is the only theory within science. The others are religious and just average man's sci-fi ideas, in addition to the Electric universe which denies all geological work anyway so they are not to be taken seriously here. There is the antropological idea as well that hunters killed all game, but humans were way too few with no technology in the subarctic and arctic, and this hypothesis also looks away from the major climate changes that happened. The meteorite/asteroid impact range is the only plausible theory. It also fits with the astronomy records of meteor motions.

@eckosters

7 ай бұрын

Comments from anonymous folks are not to be taken seriously. Full stop

@KibyNykraft

7 ай бұрын

​@@eckostersAll nicks on youtube are anonymous unless you have an official information channel. I don't. My nick is based on the email address which is based on an old electricity provider company in Scandinavia. You can't talk yourself away from not providing counter arguments. But you sure tried 😆

@KibyNykraft

7 ай бұрын

​​​@@eckosters The biggest detailed information about relevant databases on the subject of the YDI disasters is at the Kosmographia podcast on youtube. One unfortunate thing is that it is a group of mates running a radio show ,meaning 85 percent of each episode is about sports, beer and jokes. But the 15 percent is on the science. I think there must be something like 280 episodes to go through with data and valid points made. If it was north european we would of course have organized it much better.

@evastapaard2462

7 ай бұрын

the only possible theory at the moment@@KibyNykraft

North 02 is the main man keep it up man these videos are amazing I've seen em all and need more. not many people are making in-depth videos about the far times of human evolution and covering it so thoroughly. Respect from the hills of Kentucky 🤝

thank you NORTH 02.........this as been a long search for me,,,,,, salute to you brother.......

2-4cm per year sea level change is 10 times the current rate of sea level change. If the sea level changed by 2-3 feet in 20 years, everybody would notice the visible changes to the coastline.