You need to show this to Dr. Steven Greer. He is working to make such devices available to the public. He has great moment and foundation behind him. Pls upvote, Dr. Greer should see this ASAP

@antiskeptic

Ай бұрын

Any "scientist" who hitches hia wagon to Steven Greer has lost before the horse is out of the gate. LOL

@TFHxPESTILENCE

Ай бұрын

the ones that don't, end up dead?

@arigoldstein939

26 күн бұрын

Why doesn't he just ask his alien buddies to do it?

@lollynone1108

3 күн бұрын

Ha ha. What are the chances, (seriously, do the mathematical propabilities) that we are the only ones in existance in all of the planets, moons, solar systems, galaxies, universes, multiverses, quasars, etc etc etc.and that none are older than 6000 years? Wake up.

Tremendous work. I have raised this with my Twitter followers so I hope a lot of people will see this very fast.

@diogovitorino2613

2 жыл бұрын

Indeed I’m here because of you Hans

@kristof6385

2 жыл бұрын

Thx for sharing Hans. Very interesting indeed!

@DEXESgmbh

2 жыл бұрын

👀

@DaScorp

2 жыл бұрын

👀

@fraserashworth6575

2 жыл бұрын

Thx for the heads up Hans! Ben Krasnow (aka AppliedScience on youtube) has the required vacuum and evaporative deposition equipment required to replicate this, as well as the test gear to measure nanoAmps.

Evidence based science is how many discoveries have been made over the years. Run a kick starter project to build a prototype, even if it turns out to be something other than what you expect, the idea seems worth exploring.

You should contact Dr Greer. I know his team is working on funding these kind of projects with the goal of bringing it to public use.

I am back after a year, and I just got to say, please do not stop trying! I'll be coming back from time to time, I'm hoping you can share more videos, just to spread awareness and result from experiments etc

Very interesting, thank you. The 2nd law is violated under certain conditions in nonlinear optics too.

Well done. You are asking the right questions. In my career, the most exciting events were those unexpected results and what my boss liked to describe as happy accidents. Take the good luck when it falls in your lap. Don't ignore the unexpected results! Don't throw anything away until you have given it a thorough look first.

Arthur Eddington rejected the Bazouky -Zhaboutinsky (BZ) article on oscillatory chemical reactions based on violation of the second law. This type of reaction is currently a corner stone in the field of non linear chemical reactions. In addition: The experimental results of Dan Shechtman on quasi-crystals were totally rejected by Pauling. He said that there only quasi scientidts nan believe in quasicrystals. Dan Shechtman received his Nobel prize some 10 years ago for his work on quasi crystals. He had the courage to violate a mote fundamental theory than the second law - basic geometry on possible symmetries. I was always fascinated by the Casimir effect and its relation to the result 1+2+3+.... = -1/12 nicely explained by Casimir .Your experimental work is a real masterpiece.

Assuming this is accurate, I wanted to calculate how much power this would produce. So I did some math. Assuming that you made a battery like a squared off 18650, you could probably have a 15mm x 15mm x 60mm active area in the casing. That would mean layering 15× 60mm layers together. You said the layers were about 2 microns each, so to be stacked 15mm thick that would mean 7500 layers. 15mmx60mmx7500 layers is 6.75 square meters of space, which, at 70 watts per square meter, is 472.5 watts of power. Now, due to inefficiencies introduced by mass production, not to mention heat management from the current flow, you will probably only get 200 or so watts from a battery that size at most. Still, that is enough for some serious small scale energy production. I doubt you could replace the world's energy production at that rate, though. This produces about 1/3 the power of a solar panel, and in 2021 241 gigawatts of solar panels were produced. At that "1/3 as much output" level, and not the more practical output of less than half that for mass production, that would be 80 gigawatts of output per year if you could produce them as fast as solar panel companies make panels. The world uses an estimated 2500 gigawatts of power, so to produce that much you would need 31.25 years to produce enough. Doable, but not really practical. Still, as a portable form of power coupled with something like nuclear, it could help a lot

I'm very curious if the media will finally report on these discoveries, when other labs confirm your work. Any guesses how long it'll be until then? This has to be developed as fast as possible to combat climate change. I'm studying nanotechnology and would love to work on these machines in the future, it sounds too good to be true, but the sci-fi nerd in me is really rooting for you and you're team.

@moddel

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks for rooting for us. I've been avoiding making bold statements to the media until we have ironclad published proof from multiple sources that our technology is viable. There is a history of premature press releases about new energy technologies that didn't stand up to later scrutiny. I fully agree that this sort of technology needs to get out there immediately, and it's frustrating that the vetting process is so slow. It's hard for me to predict when the time will be right because there were delays in our first two publications (links given above under "show more") due to stubborn reviewers who attempted to block publication even after all their objections were met, and that may happen again.

@light8258

2 жыл бұрын

@@moddel I can see, how this is really frustrating for you and your team, but I can also see, that this is such a big claim, that it really is very hard to accept. You're research on other phenomena, that are considered fringe science, might of course also incite skepticism, but I believe in trusting people, until proven right or wrong, even when I might not share their views on other topics. You will receive a strong headwind, just like anyone or anything that threatens entire industries (especially in the energy sector), but of course I still hope for the best. After studying your papers for a bit, I now have a few questions, that I'd like to have more conclusive answers on, than I could get out of your publications. 1. Could you use another electrode material instead of nickel for the base electrode to change the current? In your model the current has to tunnel from the base electrode through the insulator, so the nickel electrode would be the decider for how much current can flow. Maybe one could change the material or use different grid structures to increase the current? 2. How did you decide on the error bars of your measurement devices? I know, you used a high precision Keithley 2612 source meter. But in the manual for that device, it says, it's error bar for current measurement is at least around 100nA, only the Model 2635 source meter has better precision, and for your voltage measurement you used a HP 3478A digital multimeter. Can you really be sure, that your error bars are correct? I just want to make sure. Believing your supplement materials, current should be in the 100 pA error range, so if that's true, all good. The scaling with area and array size seems to suggest, your measurements are precise and the effect is real. Still, it would be nice to know more about measurement accuracy or to have way bigger devices, so these doubts can be eliminated. 3. There are nano-piezoelectric devices (ZnO nanowires between two electrodes under ultrasound) with a theoretical power output of 1 W/cm³. I don't think piezoelectricity could be the whole explanation, but it is peculiar, that you used a silica dielectric, which is used for piezoelectric generators and only after putting in the dielectric, the offset current was measured. In the paper it is said, that the current can only flow between base and palladium electrode because of the high dielectric resistance. But is it possible, that a voltage inside the dielectric could have an effect on the electron density distribution in the palladium electrode right next to it ensuring a higher probability of electrons tunneling from nickel to palladium instead of palladium to nickel? Btw I do believe the current is caused by hot carrier electrons excited by quantum fluctuations, I'm just playing with ideas for even slightly possible alternative explanations, that weren't discussed in your papers. I have to admit, it's very hard to find some.

@devalapar7878

10 ай бұрын

This will never combat climate change. We are talking about nano currents. Also, the device doesn't work. But if you aren't a physicist you won't understand it.

Thanks for covering the problems with publishing at the end of the talk. As experience has shown us - experimentation and observation outweighs any theory. This paper is giving the community a result that obviously needs more looking at - especially due to the implications. Remember, Kelvin didn't think heavier-than-air flight was possible (and he even said this again AFTER it was already proven). Your quote near the end I am guessing was paraphrasing Heaviside when he talked about using his Operator Calculus: "Just because I don't know how my body digests food, doesn't mean I shouldn't eat breakfast". Keep it up. Get this information out there more. Somehow getting this effect to show up for the home-shop experimenters is what's needed - something that doesn't require such things plasma deposition or photolithography to create would be helpful.

I'd love to have you on The Singularity Lab to discuss your work.

Excellent work team, thank you!

This needs more views. Gonna try and help spread this more, but I am no big fish :c Edit: In general. I just want to know why no one is talking about this. I have read the submitted article and gone through every piece. There are definitely questions to be had and plenty of room for peer review, but WHY is no one talking about this??? Why is the scientific community just blatantly ignoring something like this? Is it too good to be true? Most likely, yeah. But the implications in of themselves could be monumental. This needs to be further investigated.

@adriaanstolk4487

2 жыл бұрын

Algorithmic bias certainly doesn’t help when trying to get exposure on this presentation

@versag3776

Жыл бұрын

It appears to me that investors aren't especially keen to allow a technology to develop that could limit their control of a top down supply chain. Ie: exotic middle eastern ancient plant material, refined and chemically seperated super rare radioactive elements, or it's synthetic isotopes. Catch me? I'm with the 99.9% of the world that believe use of super rare rather (actual, artificial or otherwise dubious) hard to get materials. Difficult to make/ solar panels with their cobalt, cadmium, lithium batteries for energy storage etc, for means of a new revolutionary energy production to change humanity are definitely not the correct path humanity should pursue. What I mean by that is it doesn't benefit future generations to govern and limit and monitor an artificial commodity.... and sets a terrible precedent for future generations how to now behave towards fellow humans. We're at a time where we have been living and affected by this system and we've steadily seen the world crumbling from greed and guilt and it's not too late to do something but we must work together and overcome this divisive greed we we're taught and become humanitarians, activists for a symbiotic relationship between humanity and Earths ecosystem. If the technology exists and is quashed and quelled by corporations that wish to maintain dominance, then we've failed. If we fall into a box of pragmatic dogma that robs us of our joy for exploration as it has some of our peers, we have failed. I haven't fallen into a pragmatic box on things only made true by consensus and I hope that I never will.

@alexprice7375

Жыл бұрын

The government doesn’t want anybody to know about this it would kill the current energy industry A lot of powerful people would lose a lot of money

@Shermanbay

8 ай бұрын

Because it's bullshit. Scientists have better things to do with their time and money that waste it on schemes like this.

@circusofsix

11 күн бұрын

how will we be slaves without oil and gas?

Congratulations on your inspirational work; the world urgently needs this!

You need a few pieces to make one. First an antenna element resonator tuned to the CMB. The second is that this element must be extremely thin so it generates a field known as surface plasmonic resonance, but in the microwave. Third the antenna array must be deposited on a field phase separation material called a topological superconductor such as graphene. Finally the assembly must be put in a strong magnetic field that encorages charge field separation. Stack these elements like pancakes to generate more voltage, make with more more surface area and you get more current. The magnetic field across the device must be as strong as possible and assymetric. It works by tunneling and charge diffusion as a very specialized rectifier diode. The ideal metal for the excitation element is a highly conductive noble metal, either gold or rhodium. It must not form a chemical compound with the carbon. A work around is to coat the graphene with a thin layer of a stable insulator.

What amazing, groundbreaking, and thorough research you and your team have done! It boggles my mind (but at the same time, I'm not surprised) that this hasn't reached a broader audience. I feel lucky that I stumbled on your video and would like to figure out the best way to share this knowledge in such a way that it will reach the right people who can create (and potentially mass produce) a practical consumer product based on this technology. I feel like with most of these things, there is a tipping point when there is enough attention that it explodes. But it's never a good idea to let something like this, which has a tremendous potential to do so much good in the world, fall to the wayside.

@miki_9034

5 ай бұрын

the big oil companies won't allow this to go public. The will do everything to suppress it.

As a physicist and engineer it's clear that if you don't follow the current paradigm you are ignored both recognition and funding and if there is any recognition it's negative because you are a threat to the paradigm and their only recourse is to attach the person and not the work.. So you are definitely going to have an uphill battle. But I hope you hang in there and continue your work. This is the future.

Please don’t stop what you’re doing and thank you 🙏 for sharing this video. Question everything and accept all results even the ones we didn’t expect. Everyone should make up their own minds up with critical thinking. 🧐 many thanks.

Material effects like long-term memory and all kinds of things are one of those places already recognized in thermodynamics itself as violating the second law of thermodynamics. If you read the book “Modern Thermodynamics: From Heat Engines to Dissipative Structures 1st Edition” written by Dilip Kondepudi & Ilya Prigogine that deals with non-equilibrium systems you will find that that's one of the areas that is known by the thermodynamicists themselves to violate that second law so we don't have to prove that we’re violating it permissibly it's already been done by a nobel prize winner.

Thank you for explaining this properly!!! I have searched and searched and everything else I find is explaining it in way a magician would talk about their best trick… all theory! You actually showed the how and why scientifically! THANK YOU!

This is astonishing work.

I greatly appreciate your efforts! You and your team add true legitimacy to a technology that heretofore has often been seen as quackery... I await the commercialization of your device with great enthusiasm!

Harnessing quantum fluctuations is the key. If you look at the experiments of the "Star in a jar", you will see that the energy that is produced is huge and the so-called "fluctuations" are actually the oscillations as the particles implode and explode (within a field). This is where the Electrons at the zero point, change through Thermo-dynamic entropy, to Protons. The Zero point is the field which is created, called a Neutron. This is also the same as in a black hole, which the Atom is a microcosm of this. The 2D model for this as a clue is the Yin Yang in 3D. It is a Toroidal field, that displays the paths of the Electrons and Protons, that spiral into the center(Vortices) where Zero point energy happens. The idea that equilibrium does not support flow in the case of the Atom is incorrect as the Electrons and Protons are in a constant state of motion or flow. I believe this is what Tesla and others knew. Look at the Wardenclyffe tower-it is a torus, sitting atop a vortex. If you emulate the structure of something - i.e. an Atom, you can harness its power.

@alanleewaddell

Ай бұрын

I hooked into the excitement of various chemical reactions in a quest for ionic fluids and did a series of salt based chemical reactions and after a number of failures I saw something happen one day .. In a round glass tank of hydrogen peroxide at a low percentage with a flat bottom I dropped a product from a series of the most promising salt based reactions that I had done into the center of this tank where I had a small pile of a reactive component waiting where it immediately produced a very small scale controlled explosion that spread out semetricly into a circle of what looked like sparkling diamonds . It was a very nice surprise ,, I produced a reactor vessel with two grids made from silver solder and with one slightly smaller than the other set closely together connected to a multi meter set to read DC voltage as I had planned to use this ionic fluid as an electrolyte. I poured the fluid in and the voltage quickly rose to nearly twelve volts before it began to slow down and I could see that it was producing dendrites or something so quickly that it filled up at the bottom of the grid and was slowly shorting the bottom of the grid out . I started producing another reactor vessel so that I could deal with the bi product and decided that I could work with what I thought resembled a flow battery and just poured my ionic fluid into a container and left it sitting as it was that winter was over and I had to make use of the weather and get my sailing vessel underway and sail it to a more desirable location before winter comes around again. After several months I returned home and realized I had left my ionic fluid sitting in an open container and it had grown into crystals but what I had expected to be a type of perchlorate more closely resembles potassium nitrate crystals .. At the same time I was doing that experiment I was working with high speed switching in a resonant circuit with a 27000mhz quartz crystal to provide the swing that could be scaled up to power a larger coil that I could tune and experiment with scalar waves as opposed to the steam powered device that Tesla created to produce the swing for one of his coils . I had an almost dead nine volt battery that was still producing six volts and expected it would be enough for a test to power the LEDs and compensate for the resistance I had in the circuit. This produced what I believe must be a resonance cascade because it produced enough DC voltage to destroy the LEDs and I wasn't sure what else but It would appear that I got more than I bargained for even if I didn't get something for nothing ....

Do you plan on making a bigger device? And what would be the difficulties in doing that?

I’m impressed, I’ll share it. Good job

Please consider contacting Dr. Steve Greer

That is brilliant work and amazing explanation. Many thanks. What is the current state of the project? Have you managed to secure funds for the prototype or commercial project.

@larryodonnell2489

10 ай бұрын

Fantastic video. All ZPE work should be crowd funded and open sourced in order for the world to transition away from fossil fuels in its entirety. Make this and the revitalization of the planet our common goal instead of consumerism, greed, and war/destruction. Once we have ZPE, we can work toward efficient atmospheric water generatorion. No one should be without shelter, water, energy, and food. These items should be free for everyone.

Legal enforcement of a physical law! That is a true gem! Now, isn't the second law of thermodynamics a "classical" law? It's a description/prediction of a stochastic process taking place between molecules in a classical manner, isn't it? I'm convinced material science is perhaps the most significant, and optical resonant cavities are going to be an increasingly important... I'm thinking of returning to school in the sciences and you've inspired me to examine materials science. Thank you! OH! I meant to ask, the second law - is there a clear theoretical basis or is it something that is regularly observed and the popular hypotheses just feel right sorta thing? It brings to mind the Einstein/Bohrs debates, which brings further to mind Einstein's derogatory term, "spooky action at a distance," which is now the foundation of some very important advances in applied physics.

@moddel

2 жыл бұрын

The second law has been proven theoretically for some idealized conditions, but there isn't a general proof that covers all possible initial conditions. I believe that the main reason the physics community adheres to it so faithfully is that there are no generally acknowledged violations of the second law. That doesn't mean there haven't been violations presented in the scientific literature; it just means that they're not generally accepted. For that to happen, we need to have lots of replications of our work, and a scaling up -- which we're working on. There is another issue, and that is that it's human nature to believe that you there's no free lunch. Violating the second law may be viewed as having that. Please note that I do believe that we're violating conservation of energy (the first law of thermodynamics). For our system to obtain energy, I believe it has to extract it from somewhere -- also to be elucidated in the future

@MarkS-gm3sf

2 жыл бұрын

@@moddel I disagree that it is human nature to believe that there is no such thing as a free lunch. I believe that the reason that so many people believe that, right now, is because it is a popular idea in this capitalist-domainated society that we currently live in. I believe that most people, throughout history, did not have a strong belief, one way or the other, on whether or not there is such a thing as a "free lunch." (I mean, if such people even though about the subject, at all.)

@devalapar7878

10 ай бұрын

​@@moddel If the second law of thermodynamics was violated, we could build machines that are impossible. That's why it is a law!

I am humbled by your discovery ! Let's make this happen !

0:00 Guys from Polish University developed something simmilar last year or so, simmilarly looking but they claimed efficiency to be 2kW/m2 (i would rather say m3 - multiple layers) and nobody was publishing any new news ever since then.. you got my attention Maxwel's Daemon precisely shows what you have said in ifst minute 1:00 and other name for that is simply heat pump. Get energy out of cold by simply pumping heat from one end to another. Making one place colder other hotter without actually changing averange energy of these two places. So simple.. technically car engine connected to heat pump is able to burns oil with 150% efficiency. The only problem is it's mechanical device, its not cost effective

Look at it this way: Electrically resistive heating has an energy used to heating ratio of 1:1. Heat pumps, however, have ratios upwards of 1:3.5. "Oh my goodness! Are we violating the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics?" No. We're simply operating two separate systems -- evaporation and condensation -- at two distinctly disparate points in a medium's phase diagram. I suspect unlocking zero-point energy would require a similar approach, where we're pulling energy at one quantum potential while returning it at another. As with heat-pumps, it will require energy to do this, but it will require considerably less energy than the energy we get out. Not to worry, as with heat pumps, that flip side of the equation is that one area of the electrophysical process gets warm, or positively charged, while another area gets cold, or negatively charge. As with solar, which inputs energy into the system via energetic photons, ZPE must have a potential which can be tapped in order for this to work. If not, well...

This doesn't violate the 2nd law, since the temperature is not uniform. It has very tiny waves that are like uniform energy, which are in fact non uniform transfers of energy. It's just no one expected to be able to harvest these by blocking out larger frequencies. Based on the scale, these are on the range of X rays to higher intensity ultraviolet light, something that should be blocked by our atmosphere, unlikely to occur in the magnitude expected, let alone harvest. Have you considered that this casimir effect is being used to block out all wavelengths of electromagnetic radiation except for X-Ray to UV rays, thus harvesting everything from UV to Radio?

Very interesting, I have thought about using the cassimir effect for vacuum energy propulsion. Could you recommend the type of equipment required to fabricate these tiny devices, or suggest further reference books? Thank you, and if there is any way to support your work please share.

@moddel

2 жыл бұрын

As you probably know, there has been a significant amount of work into using vacuum energy for propulsion. That involves a different set of constraints and technologies. Unfortunately, fabricating the current devices requires some sophisticated technology. As a starting point, I suggest that you take a look at Section 2.1 in our Symmetry paper (www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/13/3/517) and the references given there. We're hoping to simplify the fabrication in the future.

@topos100

Жыл бұрын

Error on that link...paper not found...

@alexprice7375

Жыл бұрын

Weird

@Freja_Solstheim

5 ай бұрын

@@topos100 Go to that page and use the search function for author. Enter Garret Moddel and you'll get 4 papers. Optical-Cavity-Induced Current Is the one Mr. Moddel is referring to.

@lucasbischoff144

2 ай бұрын

@@moddelfor people trying to reach the link, just remove the ) at the end of the link

You're a legend! Confirm you are not suicidal... this technology is dangerous to the status quo and people promoting it have a history of being suppressed, paid-off, being setup/entrapped/blackmailed, painted as crazy and committing 'suicide'.... but this technology is necessary. I hope you succeed in commercializing it! Don't underestimate the obstacles, but I hope you don't give up!

@johnwesley256

Ай бұрын

Agreed, even making an engine that is fuel efficient is dangerous.

@circusofsix

8 күн бұрын

well now they have these neat things called ‘direct energy weapons’ so…they can get us anywhere now. fkn scary world we live in. ☠️i am not going to off myself.☠️

Thank you for doing this work, from now on I begin to follow your channel, I think that the reasons why this type of technology does not prosper are exposed in the recent documentary by Dr. Steven Greer, we hope to be close to developing this type of technology for our own good.

@michaelbassano

Жыл бұрын

I placed a comment here a while ago suggesting Prof. Moddel should contact Dr. Steven Greer, since he has well thought-out strategy for getting such technologies out so it will benefit all humankind. My comment was deleted. 😥 Now, I know Dr. Greer makes many fantastic, unbelievable and unverifiable claims, and therefore may not have much credibility in true scientific circles. I certainly don't buy into all of his pseudo-scientific new age mumbo jumbo. But the part about humanity (and our planet) having a desperate need for such free energy devices is absolutely true. So, if there's any chance he can help to make this happen, I think it would be worth exploring those options. It would be shame to see yet another promising free energy concept being black shelved or killed by those who profit from endless wars and the destruction of our planet.

Thanks so much for this. Been working on something with anomalous results. This helped.

@alexprice7375

Жыл бұрын

Mind if I ask what?

Great video - I’d love to see a detailed description of the equipment and apparatus you used for your zero point experiment. you would have a HUGE following if you made more content.

@moddel

Ай бұрын

The details are all in the paper published in Symmetry, listed in the description of the video.

so true about the blindness of some scientists to reject anything not already described - totally shuts down new innovation. also, very clear and common sense explanation, very well presented, very much appreciate you sharing this information.

I like your idea: People were refining the development of steam powered engines before the French wanted to claim the high ground so began studying the thermodynamics of steam as a system. I think you should know your limits your job is done as basic research, now enlist Elon Musk or someone to develop practical applications for your technology then others will be scrambling in FOMO to catch up. There is a difference between skills as inventor, entrepreneur and theoretician and all have a role to play. Also perhaps work on the applied aspects for increasing the output, checking the duration over long periods (years), Rather than wasting time to prove yourself incorrect. Keep up the good work and good luck :)

@moddel

10 ай бұрын

No argument. I'd love to get a company interested in the applications to do the engineering. It will require substantial resources and commitment.

This need to be shared. ❤

The dejavu…. I encourage everyone to see “The Lost Century” documentary!

Think of it this way : The "boiling space" is effectively a sea with a universal breeze over it. There is an average wave height and peaks and troughs. Tell me that wave energy can not gain peaks and troughs !

Great explanation of the Casimir effect. My guess is that nanotechnology will in the future be able to use the Casimir force to generate energy instead of just dealing with the problem of trying to eliminate the effect. Even the laboratory device Dr. Moddel presented looks promising considering what an industrial manufacturing of such devices could produce.

@rogerphelps9939

Жыл бұрын

This is nonsense. There is absolutely no way of exploiting the Casimir effect. Separating and moving the plates will take more energy than you get out.

@Anders01

Жыл бұрын

@@rogerphelps9939 I was thinking that on the nano scale it may be possible to overcome friction and for example construct perpetual oscillators, but yes it's just my amateur speculation, it could very well be impossible even on the nano scale.

@devalapar7878

10 ай бұрын

@@Anders01 That already exists. It is not a big deal. These system can't change the state. Also, I hate people who think we should care about their inventions. It is on you to show that we should care. If you work with nano currents, you will miss so many mistakes. The device he showed is already flawed. His device is not in equilibirium, but he doesn't follow all the energies. His device changes the amount of charges on both sides. This will change the voltage. And when he removes charges, you will spend energy (which will balance the energy sheet).

I believe your results are because your coatings are approaching the single atom monoatomic layer. This is similar to single layer graphene which has been able to superconduct or insulate perfectly. According to David Hudson's work it would act like a sphere, the most efficient shape in nature to capture energy. The art of the covenant contains most likely a monatomic powder. I can explain if you would like.

This is nothing short of amazing. Well done. I think personally that people should get on board and invest in this great invention. I think a great way to go, would be, power a device with this tech and show the world that this works. I have no idea how much this would cost, forgive my ignorance, if this is very expensive. Who could dispute it then. Without people like you where would we be. I hope you get the recognition and investment that i believe this deserves. Thank you.

Is it possible to upload a video showcasing your devices directly (the existing ones)? I think video evidence of a measured current and to see your equipment and the devices in your laboratory would be of interest to a lot of people and reduce skepticism about your claims by a lot. Maybe I could even convince people at my university to look into this and replicate it.

Just, wow. Thank you thank you for your work.

Here is why I think zero-point energy is real: E = m * c^2 c = distance (in 3 dimensional space) / time, or... c = (x + y + z)/time, so... E = m * (d^2 / t^2), rearraigning... d (space) = (E * t^2 / m)^1/2, thus... A given volume of space must have an enormous amount of energy within it. It is the energy of spacetime or the energy required to create the space of the universe. If everything is made of energy, why not spacetime itself?

@johnwesley256

Ай бұрын

Agreed, I think mainstream science doesn't fully understand time-space (aether / ether)

Awesome presentation and well explained. 👍What hinders you to make a big Prototyp to find investors and to get it into large production? The technology is already used for micro electronics production and therefore you could produce it in large quantities already. What do you need to do so?

@moddel

2 жыл бұрын

Better fabrication facilities and more personnel.

@locksherlo6102

Жыл бұрын

Professor Moddel- are you in need of funding? Thanks for sharing with us - excellent explanation

Can you link to the other experiments you measured. I can't find them.

@moddel

11 ай бұрын

We haven't published them yet.

In Casimir mirrors experiment has been subtracted the gravitational attraction?

Will there be an update video on this channel, once the prototype powering an LED is done? How's the progress going?

@moddel

Жыл бұрын

Our research papers and talks are listed here (to be updated in the future): www.colorado.edu/faculty/moddel/research/zero-point-energy-technology . An update to this talk is at kzread.info/dash/bejne/rGqTra2RhMW6qco.html . The new stuff starts about halfway through.

This work reminds me of the 'Cold Fusion' debate which again was about deriving useful energy but the problem (as I remember it) was that no one else could reproduce it. At around the 30 minute point in the talk, much is said about 'Ubiquitous Power' for lighting, electric vehicles, desalination etc etc. Could we just start with a demonstration of Zero Point Energy powering a simple torch (flashlight) - to me that would be impressive. I don't wish to come across as sounding negative, but if this subject is to be more than just an obscure scientific curiosity, then producing a simple electrical device would seem to be the way forward; that said I wish you all the best in your endeavours.

@moddel

Ай бұрын

Agreed about the demonstration. That's our goal.

@christopherleubner6633

Ай бұрын

I desribed how to create a pseudozpe device that harvests energy from the CMB Try and put your device in a magnetic field at a 45 degree angle to the resonant cavity. It will help with charge separation if you made a true ZPE device.

Garret, Please don't mind me asking if your devices were in a vacuum chamber? What is the power vs temperature curve? When I think of zero point energy, I think of 0 deg K and low pressure vacuum. It's unclear what these thermodynamic conditional variables are. These conditions are usually stated in every engine test and experimentation. Lol. Was it at room temperature? Then it's probably harvesting heat. Put it outside for 24 hours. Is there a daily cycle to the power output? If so, then solar cells make more sense.

@moddel

11 ай бұрын

The device measurements in what we've published were done at room temperature. I agree that additional measurements under different conditions should be presented. Progress is at a snail's pace, and I wish we had more resources and collaborators to do this quickly.

It's imperative that we really need to unlearn and relearn.

hey daily I hear you and I also want to create the zero point energy technology so can you guide me properly

Is this only at a “nano” scale for the device? Can this experiment be done with normal items? If so, could you show this in another video?

@moddel

10 ай бұрын

At this point the fabrication requires a highly specialized lab. All the procedures are described in our published articles. I don't see why it could not ultimately be produced with much lower tech once it's been worked on sufficiently.

It would be interesting if experimental physicists had to publish all their intermediate results along with their final results. You would get more insight into trends. I think part of the difficulty with following renegade results is that (1) a lot of work is not done carefully and so it can get very frustrating to follow and (2) it is only worthwhile if you have the money and time to do it out of personal interest. That said, I am interested as to how the observed effect violates the 2nd law of thermodynamics. Is the 2nd law of dynamics rigorously enough defined to cover cases of energy from a vacuum?

@devalapar7878

10 ай бұрын

Yes, it is.

This would be a tremendous achievement and I really hope you succeed. That said, any skepticism is still valid unless you can scale the device so that it can produce many orders of magnitude more power to offset any systemic error. For example, having a ~143 cm^2 device constantly producing 1W of energy in any condition and for a sufficiently long period of time would be the definitive proof that the source of energy can't be chemical or even nuclear in origin (betavoltaics from impurities?). Do you have any plans to scale the device in the near future? How much is the expected power density (per volume)? Thanks!

@moddel

2 жыл бұрын

I agree fully about the need to scale up. We're working on it, but with limited facilities and personnel, it's slow going. Regarding power density, so far the devices have been planar, and up to about 70 W/m^2. Once the devices can be stacked, the volume density will be substantial -- assuming everything scales.

@rogerphelps9939

Жыл бұрын

@@moddel This is doomed to failure.

YOU ARE AWESOME!! Even with the argue of thermal dynamics I have no idea why you cannot harvest energy from the vacuum I always thought it was possible. Turns out it is!

Assuming the power scales, could this supersede fusion power as the energy of the future? Another point, when "we" try to create Sci-Fi devices with current technology (phasers, warp drive, whatever) power is always the bottle neck, would this technology make that sort of stuff possible?

@moddel

2 жыл бұрын

On a fundamental level, yes, this could be a power source for everything. However, there will always be technological constraints, and so it's reasonable to expect that there will be multiple useful power sources.

What is the next step for this technology going forward? Could it be independently verified by a trusted third party? Could a fool-proof demonstration device be constructed that powers something like an LED?

@moddel

2 жыл бұрын

Both of those are exactly the plan. Stay tuned.

@Idonai

2 жыл бұрын

@@moddel What would be the best way to stay up to date with your research and results?

@moddel

2 жыл бұрын

@@Idonai Here's the zero-point energy page on my lab website: ecee.colorado.edu/~moddel/QEL/ZPE.html. The location might be changed in the future, in which case you'll be able to find it through my department page here: www.colorado.edu/ecee/garret-moddel. Thanks for your interest.

The only way I can describe this is that since your excluding some fluctuations between the plates, your are creating a localized imbalance. The response to which is the flow of energy until all fluctuations on the outside of the device match the inside. But that will take a very long time. I'm unsure if this device is dangerous in any way to cause local vacuum decay to a new ground state.

Great video I watched this all the way to the end but I'm not quite sure, what is the call to action here?

@moddel

2 жыл бұрын

At this point we, or others who have read our papers, will use the resources we have to slowly demonstrate more. Alternatively, if a deep pocketed benefactor or foundation finds this to be sufficiently intriguing, the process will speed up.

@odiexx

2 жыл бұрын

@@moddel Notwithstanding the amount of time necessary to commercialize something like this, or even make a working product that can be sold to the public at large but.... What we need today is a device that can produce electricity, heat a home, and provide clean drinking water, that everyone can have in their house.

Nice work sharing your great ideas. Think of crowd funding because no institution will be willing to support your work. Never give up

Very interesting explanation of the theory behind zero point energy devices. Could this be sort of the same mechanism of the electret device?

@moddel

2 жыл бұрын

It's good that you bring this up. An electret has a built in charge that produces a voltage, and so appears to be similar to our devices. The difference is that electrets cannot produce a constant current or power because that would deplete that built in charge. We were concerned that our devices might be producing current due to built in charge, and so carried out experiments to test that. The results from one of these experiments is shown in Figure 6(a) in our Symmetry paper [www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/13/3/517]. It shows a continuous current output extending over 4 hours (which we've now measured over longer times). If the current were due to built in charge, a simple calculation described in the paper shows that the current would stop after a few microseconds, and not continue indefinitely. Therefore the mechanism for our technology is different from what produces a voltage in electrets.

Take the very basic crystal radio from the ground up and your basic antenna and put a Tesla coil in between them. The coil is hollow and gets highly charged air pumped and the ions pass through the coil to generate current. The ground and coil and antenna represent a transistor. And current flows through the transistor to a bridge rectifier to a capacitor hooked up in parallel to other capacitors. That’s a start for now.

Optical-Cavity-Induced Current has over 12,500 full text views now! Congratulations! Do you have any updates to share? Any new papers in the works?

@moddel

2 жыл бұрын

A video that digs more deeply into the issues raised was just posted: kzread.info/dash/bejne/eaGA1ahuqajKadI.html The first part in the new video is largely a summary of the Unlocking video, with a few additions. The new material starts at 23 minutes into the video.

@thorleach6988

2 жыл бұрын

@@moddel Thanks! And other labs have started to try to replicate your work, that's great! I do have a question about your "Thermal Model" outlined at 37:23. You state that this model would obey the first law, but violate the second law. That would be true if the "volume" of the overall system remains fixed, but could it be that the "cooling" of the environment is achieved via a local expansion of spacetime? I know it sounds crazy, but it reminds me on the cooling of the CMB, only in reverse I guess... Those photons "cooled" from 3000K to 2.73K without transferring any of their energy to any physical entity. The CMB photons' cooling comes entirely from the expansion of the universe (at least that's my understanding). So, in your proposed Thermal Model, if these devices are causing an expansion of spacetime in their immediate vicinity while they are extracting ZPE energy, then this would stretch the wavelength of the surrounding radiation and the violation of the 2nd law would be circumvented (I guess, in a way, the device would be converting time (the remaining lifetime of the universe) into usable energy and thereby accelerating the overall expansion and heat death of the universe). Perhaps this could even be tested by shining a laser beam past the cavity while it is extracting ZPE to see if the wavelength changes while the cavity is producing current?

@thorleach6988

2 жыл бұрын

Then again, I guess that would mean the device could also be used to build a "warp" drive... perhaps that's a bridge to far.

@thorleach6988

2 жыл бұрын

Interesting bit a little after 27 minutes where Dr. Mike McCulloch says that his Quantized Inertia predicts (approximately) your observations. kzread.info/dash/bejne/amaE0Nelhc-5g9I.html Gosh, I haven't heard from McCulloch in forever! Almost forgot about him...

@nazgullinux6601

10 ай бұрын

A warp drive cannot exist. You cannot warp a mathematical construct. Spacetime continuum is a construct of math. It's not a physical reality.

More, please!

Excellent!

Don't die please!

This sounds an awful lot like the Schottkey diode origin, and the Fermi level/barrier manipulation of metal/semiconductor doping.

I’d like to argue for a working prototype leading to a pile moment to juice up a simple transistor radio. What’s stopping this?

Congratulations on your work's success. Have you attempted to measure any changes under acceleration?

@moddel

2 жыл бұрын

Should we? You mean to see Unruh radiation? That would required huge acceleration. Or to look for piezoelectric effects? Anyway, no we haven't.

@pvlis

2 жыл бұрын

​@@moddel I mean to see whether it is responsive to changes in its relationship with gravity. If you let 'charge' retake its original connotation of volumetric flow, then gravity may be redefined as a particular displacement current rather than a bending of rulers. What was originally at rest could now be seen as caught in a torrent, and perhaps it couples to the flow of the environment. I understand how this perspective welcomes snickers and ridicule as much as the claim to have skirted thermodynamics.

@moddel

2 жыл бұрын

@@pvlis Interesting. There is a Gauss's law for gravity, but I'd think that the energy flux on Earth is very small... but worth checking out when we have a chance.

@timstoffel4799

11 ай бұрын

There are actually two different theories of the casimir effect: the Static Casimir effect, and the Dynamic Casimir effect. The version discussed in this video are actually the Static Casimir Effect. The Dynamic Casimir effect requires the plates tom be in motion, and this is what in part you may be driving towards here. The good news is both the Static and Dynamic Casimir effect have been experimentally observed. The dynamic effect was observed by means of virtual 'plates' created with microwaves.

Any updates? Have you been able to move into a dedicated lab?

I notice that devices stack vertically, while source and drain currents flow horizontally. Is this orthogonality important?

@moddel

18 күн бұрын

No, that's just the way we make electrical contact.

I'm interested in how to get the different layers so I can put them together myself

@moddel

11 ай бұрын

Unfortunately, until we or someone else figures out how to do this much more simply, you need a very specialized lab to do this. Some of the layers need to have a precise thickness within a few interatomic distances, the purity of the layers is critical, and the dimensions for each cell is about 1/millionth of a meter. I have confidence that this can be done in a more low-tech way, but it'll take a major investment of time and resources to get there.

The second law of thermodynamics states: " It only applies to closed systems ". Taping energy from the quantum vacuum has nothing to do with this law, since all of nature, and the illusion of solid matter state have to be constantly filled up by the closest "reality projectors " , our Sun and the Earth. Otherwise, matter would cease to exist and that's the reason why anything in existence is in an open loop with its environment, and closed loop systems are only theoretical, and at the macro scale. Not the quantum state. I don't know why so many researchers and scientists fail to mention this and or are afraid of the second law boogie man.

Particularly consider Casimir Cavity as the source of Magnetic attraction/repulsion? ZPE cavity would explain a whole lot about this fascinating stuff magnetism.

I just noticed this was two years ago. Has anything new happened or did something shut it down??

What happens if the Casimiro cavity is smaller or equal than the tunnel layer. I mean you have a metal isolator metal isolator metal device

@moddel

Ай бұрын

You're right that that the metal-insulator-metal device is a skinny Casimir cavity, and so there are two cavities in tandem. We have some ideas about how that affects things, but getting a good theorist involved at some point would be helpful.

I cant believe this guy only has 125 subscribers

From everything I understand about the physics of this and the 2nd Law. While there is the cassimir effect, you can't harness any of this energy because ir would always take more to unlock it. You'll still butt up against the 2nd law any time you try and get something for nothing. Maxwell's demon suggests this as well - just by knowing information about where particles are in space, you could separate hotter and colder (higher/lower energy atoms) by opening and closing a gate, and gain energy by creating an energy gradient for nothing. Even if it used less energy to do this than create the gradient - then you run into the fact that information itself requires energy - the mathematics can be worked out to come out as an equilibrium, which is essentially, if you start the process, it would run forever - but the problem then comes down to information storage, the erasure of the information that's inevitably required pushes you back to losing energy. You can't store the particle information forever in the system, you have to start removing it at some point. That's it. Game over. But you'd never even get close to constructing such a perfect system in the first place. It's only mathematically possible - then it still doesn't work, you come up against quantum physics laws about information.

@moddel

10 ай бұрын

This is different from attempting to extract energy from ambient thermal energy, which is what Maxwell's demon attempts to do. Instead, it appears that we're extracting it from zero-point energy fluctuations, which don't have the same relationship with the 2nd law. I address this more fully in our third paper: Zero-Point Energy: Capturing Evanescence." Garret Moddel, Journal of Scientific Exploration 36(3) 493-503 (2022). doi.org/10.31275/20222567. Available for download: journalofscientificexploration.org/index.php/jse/article/view/2567/1687

@johnwesley256

Ай бұрын

​​@@moddel Do you think the Stanford ringing bell experiment uses zero point? The bell has been ringing for over 100 years and I don't understand how it can do this. Definitely seems to violate the 2nd law. Edit: Both of those links are now dead. 🙁

@dananorth895

Ай бұрын

If you search internet for the title paper or author it's there, first link is dead at source journal. But 2nd listing is ResearchGate who has free pdf dl of paper. Click author name for listing of other works. RG lists 169 papers...all free or request.

As per Vedic science the space is energy and it is not empty as is generally believed. AND ENTIRE UNIVERSE VIBRATES ALL THE TIME. THIS MAKES ME BELIEVE IN YOUR IDEA OF ZPE. IT WILL BECOME PRACTICAL ONE DAY. CONGRATULATIONS.

Danke. Sehr interessante Erklärung.

@moddel

2 жыл бұрын

Bitte sehr

I think it’s time we updated our understanding of physics!!

i completely believe you it takes lot of dedication

I love how the guy states the whole community agrees about the 2° law, then says "if we could just capture the energy... FAST, we could make it" 😂

The second law of thermodynamics is routinely violated by heat pumps. Dennis Lee demonstrated his super-efficient (COP> 12) heat pump combined with a Fischer cycle phase change heat engine (80 - 90% efficient) combined, which generated 10 KW of electricity by using the atmospheric heat as an energy source. His demonstration took place in an auditorium in Oxnnard California in1985. The law that Dennis Lee violated was the unwritten law that Free Energy is not to be allowed. Within a few days of his demonstration, his office and laboratories were raided by the Ventura County Sheriffs Office. Dennis Lee was held without charge in jail for a year and then released after his company went bankrupt. Could this be the real reason why the scientific community is silent about this work?

Love the heaviside quote you snuck in there. Why should I not enjoy my dinner because I don't understand my digestive system lol

Did you look for Triboelectricity, or for electrolytic electricity for the source of this device? I mean the electrodes are dissimilar. Dose it also work with similar metals? We have to be sure that it is undisprovable. Can it be made with household items?

@light8258

Ай бұрын

I think the electrodes can be made from different metals, but you definitely can't do this with household items, because of the tunnel diode, which has to be in the nanometer range. This can only be produced via nanofabrication/lithography. But you're right, that there are many other options (different explanations) left untested, even though the evidence seems in favor of vacuum fluctuations. We just have to wait for independent replication and more tests on these devices.

@icebluscorpion

7 күн бұрын

@@light8258 you are right but schottky diode for example can be easily made at home with copper two oxide (the black cupper oxide) by heating and oxidizing it in a flame Robert Murry Smith showed in his channel a novel approach of hoy to build a metal/metal oxide/metal junction. i really want this to reproduce it at home to independently confirm or dismiss it. I really want this to be real because it sounds so simple and ingenious at the same time. Next step should be to build it with similar metals to exclude to build a solid electrolyte battery if it really works as described then it should be independent from metal combination.

Interesting presentation. Was the experiment done at different temperatures, near absolute zero and very high temperatures?

@moddel

10 ай бұрын

Yes, but it needs to be done more rigorously before I'd feel comfortable publishing the results.

@Tony770jr

10 ай бұрын

@@moddel Makes sense. Do you think the energy output is proportional to temperature?

@moddel

10 ай бұрын

@@Tony770jr From what we've seen so far, it appears to be independent of temperature. I'm hedging, though, because we need more replications before we can be sure.

correct direction

Even if all of this is working, isn’t there a problem after longer periods of time? (Note that I am just a physics student who hasn’t learned anything about quantum mechanics yet.) If we manage to isolate the photons from their anti particles to stop the annihilation of both, doesn’t that mean that there is a constantly increasing amount of anti particles collecting in the Casimir chamber? And wouldn’t that mean that after a while there are so many of them that the time for the photons to escape the chamber is always decreasing and ultimately it will be impossible? (Without emptying the chamber somehow)

@moddel

2 жыл бұрын

Your question reminds me of the simple (and not fully accurate) explanation for Hawking radiation, in which one half of a particle-antiparticle pair falls into the black hole and leaves the other outside. If my model for our device operation is correct, it is a photon that is absorbed. Since photons are their own antiparticles, there are no remaining antiparticles that collect.

Just re-watched this, and a question that comes to my mind is: What happens to the zero point energy field if you are using a very large version of this device? If you take enough energy from the zero point field, would that cause a flow in the surrounding field, and what happens when you have a flowing zero point field?

@moddel

Жыл бұрын

A basic quantum mechanical model views zero-point energy as being a fixture of space. By that model, when you remove the zero-point energy from a particular volume of space, the zero-point energy that remains in that volume does not change. That model would seem to contradict conservation of energy, the first law of thermodynamics. According to another model, stochastic electrodynamics, zero-point fluctuations are real electromagnetic fluctuations, and when you harvest them that volume of space needs to be filled in by energy flowing in from elsewhere. Another model, which I'm calling the thermal model, is that the zero-point energy fluctuations are fed by thermal fluctuations ultimately, which would mean that when you harvest the zero-point energy, that volume becomes cooler. That would violate the second law of thermodynamics. So… different people would answer the question differently. This is described about halfway through a more recent video that is posted here: kzread.info/dash/bejne/rGqTra2RhMW6qco.html

this is great!! you are awesome!

Entrenched it is, but the part that is never mentioned is that it only applies to CLOSED SYSTEMS. If we are investigating a potentially OPEN SYSTEM where the energy itself is coming from outside of the CLOSED SYSTEM how could something that only applies to the CLOSED SYSTEM itself apply??? Both quantum physics (zero point / quantum fluctuations) AND Cosmology (dark energy / dark matter) indicate that we are immersed in a sea of energy, possibly the same energy with their different names, and for which their math tells them is there, but their instruments cannot detect. Maybe this is the first instrument that can detect/use it.

Did he miss checking the galvanic interaction of those various metals and oxides? Ni is short 2 electrons in 3d and Pd has a full 3d and 4d shell, with loosely bound electrons. There could be a probability current for electrons to be given up by Pd to Ni, I think.

@moddel

2 жыл бұрын

That's a legitimate concern. We carried out several experiments that test for it, as described the Symmetry paper (with link given in "Show More" under the video). In particular, Figure 6 shows that the current continues indefinitely (we've extended it much longer than the 4 hours shown), which indicates that it's not a chemical reaction that is getting used up. Also, the output varies with the cavity width, shown in Figure 4a&b, and with the addition of the mirror, shown in Figure 8; those variations wouldn't be the case if the response were due to a galvanic interaction, which would be the same independent of cavity thickness and mirror.

@ToddDesiato

2 жыл бұрын

@@moddel Good answer. Thanks!

The only theoretical problem is, this quantum tunneling device is not a Casimir cavity. But it works anyway, because quantum tunnelling itself is in non-equilibrium with ZPE. Now, Tesla and Moray discovered ‘overunity cosmic energy’ devices based on Fowler Nordheim quantum tunneling, that had output of 50 KWatt. The Born rule is invalid for quantum tunneling (which was already expressed by Gamov’s original theory about quantum tunneling, overruled by Max Born). Antony Valentini also described non-equilibrium qm statistics that violate Born’s rule, but he did not yet discover that quantum tunneling does the trick. This effect can be optimized and on a big scale. Goodluck, and keep up the good work, excellent presentation, and excellent thinking.

@moddel

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks for your comments. I'm hoping to attract a quantum theorist familiar with Casimir physics to help develop a full theory of operation.

@koenvanvlaenderen5568

2 жыл бұрын

@@moddel An excellent presentation on the Casimir effect: kzread.info/dash/bejne/Y2atzMSypdG4lLA.html by Peter Milonni. It does not answer the question how conduction electrons are influenced by the Casimir force. First of all: is this force a conserved force or not? Imho, zpe extraction/conversion is not necessarily a Casimir force effect.