Under which circumstances can we hold a machine liable for its acts? Jaap Hage
Ғылым және технология
The lecture of Jaap Hage delivered during the conference entitled "Machine Ethics and Machine Law" co-organized by Department for the Philosophy of Law and Legal Ethics at the Jagiellonian University, Institute of Philosophy at the Jagiellonian University, and Copernicus Center for Interdisciplinary Studies in November 2016.
Jaap Hage studied law and philosophy in Leiden. Presently he holds the chair of Jurisprudence (Legal Theory) at the University of Maastricht (Netherlands). His research interests include: legal Logic; legal episteomology, including the method(ology) of legal science; basic legal concepts (e.g. the nature of rights, duties, juridical acts, legal rules); and the (ir)relevance of free will for law.
More information: www.jaaphage.nl
Пікірлер: 1
Jaap, Great perspective. One observation, Fatalism or Determinism, the physicist/data scientist in me thinks that a hybrid of both is also plausible (most likely for higher function), where the actor may effect the deterministic elements (nodes) of the flow, not the fatalistic elements.