Ok thank you for making this because I just watched this and I needed to hear someone at least attempt to explain

If Salvador Dali was alive today, he could use the present day technology to create the greatest surreal movie of all time.

@som1980

2 жыл бұрын

People in the future are going to look at our movies and think the same thing.

@username2872

Жыл бұрын

Yeah something like the work of Yoshitoshi Abe or Satoshi Kon's

@andrewjohnstone963

Жыл бұрын

Imagination needs no pyrotechnics Absurd opinion

@andrewjohnstone963

Жыл бұрын

Bunuel would have laughed hysterically at your opinions analyse package limits tedium What complete shite Its not to be analysed Get a grip please

A very informative and informative video. Dalí would have loved it as a start to get to know his work. Within the Spanish-speaking scene, Dalí and Buñuel are two separate universes. One could speak of dozens and dozens of anecdotes of each one. But I think the secret is to have united his passions, traumas and weaknesses to a method: the paranoid surrealist critic. Most French and Spanish surrealists with so much automatism end up in delusional and confused verbiage that only wants to futilely scandalize. Dalí and Buñuel managed to scandalize the extreme right and Catholicism and it almost had to take until the 70s and 80s for this work to be premiered again.

Surrealism was based from the beginning on Freud's theory of psychoanalysis, without which it would never have existed. In order to understand Un Chien Andalou, one must: 1. Not to try to interpret him through logical coherence but through archetypes - symbolization. 2. To fit them into an indeterminate puzzle, like an algorithm whose sequence has been disrupted and must be restored using context and ''ideograms''. 3. To take into account the reference framework within which it was created, which of course includes the prevailing climate, the cultural elements of its time- culture of the place, the dominant ideology, etc. 4. The most difficult of all, to enter the subconscious of the creators: Dali-Buñuel. Without this he will never be able to be understood, since they have created a completely personal code~ universe. For example the image of ants coming out of the palm of the hand is a recurring expression and art pattern with strong symbolism and a deep impact of the overall Dali's creation. 5. to feel and enjoy him... Ps: here is the first tip, un chien undalou is not a person, is an eternal spirit running through billions of bodies. One of wich was jaibo...

Good analysis Alfonso. I studied Dali at Pace University and learned about surrealism and went to the Dali museum in FL. Basha from Stanford Psychology Research Dept.

Very good video, hearing interpretations on Surrealist Films is always interesting.

Bodies are decapitated or beheaded... hands are severed or removed, leaving the body partially or wholly dismembered... happy to help!

I love Un Chien Andalou! Thanks for making this video... it was awesome :)

I dont know if this was intentional or not but in the beginning scene with the man smoking a cigarrette the cigarrette casts a shadow on the mans face and for a moment it looks like dali's famous moustache.

Cool video, thanks for the analysis.

Very well done. 🙏

luv this

Apt analysis, although you missed the glaring fear of death throughout the whole movie.

Music title plz 🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽

Good speculations. I thought the second young man represented the super ego that’s why he is reprimanding the first young man. I guess a father figure is also a interesting way to see him. It also seems to me like when he looks at his palm with the ants coming out of it and realizes he is a mortal and then he thinks what’s to stop him from indulging in his sexual desires but then when he tries to approach the woman of the two priests and with the 10 Commandments represent the guilt society has instilled in him which stop him.?

@cockeyedoptimista

Жыл бұрын

Whoa, good job, Som! Very intelligent analysis. I thought the (young-sounding) narrator was a bit too confident. Super-ego: almost obvious, if one is going to go Freudian. This guy just looked up a dream-book, I think. He also didn't even mention the huge tug-load-pulling scene. (Were the priests carrying the 10 commandments? I'll have to check.) - Your comment is very polite! Mine is less so.

@cockeyedoptimista

Жыл бұрын

Whoa, good job, Som! Very intelligent analysis. I thought the (young-sounding) narrator was a bit too confident. Super-ego: almost obvious, if one is going to go Freudian. This guy just looked up a dream-book, I think. He also didn't even mention the huge tug-load-pulling scene. (Were the priests carrying the 10 commandments? I'll have to check.) - Your comment is very polite! Mine is less so.

@cockeyedoptimista

Жыл бұрын

Whoa, good job, Som! Very intelligent analysis. I thought the (young-sounding) narrator was a bit too confident. Super-ego: almost obvious, if one is going to go Freudian. This guy just looked up a dream-book, I think. He also didn't even mention the huge tug-load-pulling scene. (Were the priests carrying the 10 commandments? I'll have to check.) - Your comment is very polite! Mine is less so.

@cockeyedoptimista

Жыл бұрын

Whoa, good job, Som! Very intelligent analysis. I thought the (young-sounding) narrator was a bit too confident. Super-ego: almost obvious, if one is going to go Freudian. This guy just looked up a dream-book, I think. He also didn't even mention the huge tug-load-pulling scene. (Were the priests carrying the 10 commandments? I'll have to check.) - Your comment is very polite! Mine is less so.

can you also explain the end when the woman is walking on the beach with the guy

@pedrosardinha3711

3 жыл бұрын

I'm not sure if there's a meaning to it, but I do know that supposedly tge ending was going to be the main characters dying eaten alive by a swarm of insects. But they ran out of money by the time so they just went with that. Still, there might be a meaning to it, but I don't know what it is

@som1980

2 жыл бұрын

Maybe when he kills his father figure (the second young man) he finally becomes independent and he can have a relationship with the woman. But then they come across the open box which might be holding some kind of secret, in this case maybe it’s mortality. So they both die and decay at the end, as foreshadowed by the ants coming out of the guys hand earlier.

You can choose to find meaning or you can choose to not find meaning... but just like in a Dali painting (and just like dreams), it's always there.

@radio.ned1385

Жыл бұрын

I would argue that meaning isn't something that can be 'found', it can only be applied by the viewer. We can choose to apply meaning or we can choose to not apply meaning, but nonetheless there's always the possibility that we can apply it.

among us

I feel like the man coming on his bicycle dressed in woman's clothes is like.. in this society men are women and women are men. That's why the women in the film look so masculine. And there's always something creeping up on a woman to make her appear more masculine - her armpit hair (which she needs to shave off to stay feminine) - that's what the man takes as his mouth in the end. He's lost the ability to express his manhood through his own words, that's why he takes what makes the woman a man as his own manhood. There's repeated references to androgyny or whatever you wanna call it.. hermaphroditism - in the movie. Like the tie and the box being multicolored - or black and white I should say. Striped. That represents opposites together. Which is what the man is, carrying the bicolored (had to google that word :D) box. Also the woman changes the original black tie on the bed (!) to a striped one that was in the box. That's what the man was cherishing - his capability of being both sexes at once. The woman in the end resents the man reminding her of that capability in her (by speaking her armpit hair, so to speak, in taking it as his mouth) - hers disappeared because the man in a sense stole it (something she had kept hidden). She tries to live a normal life with a normal man (who reminds her of the passage of time - the clock - which she resents) - they find the remnants of the hermaphroditic secret on the beach (which will equally swallow them up soon enough).. and when they're buried in the sand, flowers and butterflies seem to grow out of them. There's a kind of rebirth in the death of tradition. the traditional couple. the man trying to approach the woman dragging behind all that stuff i feel like is tradition weighing the man down. When he saw the masculine woman interested in the representation of his failing manhood (the ants in the hand) he became furious.. maybe to overcompensate his feeling of lost manhood, which he maybe wasn't aware of before (in the beginning he's kind of a wimp.. can't do anything, falls on his bike and the woman has to console him). Interestingly enough, the masculine woman who held on to the hand got run over. So basically people who pine for lost days, who hold on to remnants, reminders of lost times, better times, get run over. That's why the cop stopped her - she was disturbing peace. That's what you do when you try to bring back old values. And the man was insensed when he realized what he was.. he tried to attack the woman. To overcompensate for the feeling of effeminacy. And the woman defended herself, because it was too much, but ultimately she relented because at least he was trying. The woman on the street looked really sad about the failing manhood btw. And the teacher is like the old man.. he tells the man to throw off all these silly garments he has on. To become a man again. The man tries to hold on to the last bit of them.. he puts him in the corner. But sixteen years before he was still a soft soul. And there's a realization that what he gave him was garbage.. what he taught him was just scribbled notebooks and dirty desks.. nothing worth anything. He gives the books as a weight to him as a recognition of their worthlessness, which become weapons in the child's hands, with which he shoots his identical father. He's angry, the old man is reconciled to the fact that he was a failure. That's what these times are like. Men overcompensate and others are effeminate.. there's no balance. And it's in an age of unbalance when old father figures grasp at vanishing women (objects of desire) and are finally taken back to nature where similar old men (who probably shared the same fate) collect them.

Ateneo?

@edgy8481

2 жыл бұрын

@@loungeabout6533 Arriba aqui. Ex ECP😉

It’s actually pronounced Sigmund “FROOD”.

IS THAT AMONGUS!!!!

@fersweeeney5653

3 жыл бұрын

big chungus XD

Thanks