What sort of role would you have for a fast ship like this?

@shariqjootawala1799

3 жыл бұрын

Probably recon and convoy harrassment

@AuraKnightTheLucario

3 жыл бұрын

also makeshift troop transport

@spatha2584

3 жыл бұрын

Basically HMS Thunderchild

@bryanwakefield8879

3 жыл бұрын

pizza delivery for the fleet lol

@Stealth17Gaming

3 жыл бұрын

@@bryanwakefield8879 Dominos now also delivers at sea!

Nobody: Stealth: let's make this boi fast Boat: E U R O B E A T engage

@antonioradovic7461

3 жыл бұрын

*Deja vu starts playing*

@matthewyang7893

3 жыл бұрын

@@antonioradovic7461 Exactly my dude, exactly.

@maxx1o1

3 жыл бұрын

euroboat

@charlesc.9012

2 жыл бұрын

40s technology probably cannot hold it together at that speed because it is such a big boi. The Shimakaze consumed as much fuel as a battleship as a 40-knot DD, but even she has nothing on this one

_Deja Vu! I just drifted this ship before- HIGHER ON THE SEAS! And I know it's my time to fire!_

@magnum6763

3 жыл бұрын

insane

@Mooncricketstinks

3 жыл бұрын

+1 for creativity 👌

@magnum6763

3 жыл бұрын

@@Mooncricketstinks ik he a gamer

@asrielthespaceshiba7723

3 жыл бұрын

OHHHHHHHHHHHH. **Eurobeat Intensifies**

@randomhomeschooledweirdo

2 жыл бұрын

What a legend

What the game is lacking are some newer Torpedo Boat hulls like the PT 71, where such a ridiculous speed is not that ridiculous. Cheap, small, fast. Other than that Warthunder has some Hydrofoil Crafts. At least the existet at that time.

@Starjumper2821

3 жыл бұрын

I'm not sure this speed is ever not ridiculous. At that speed having any crew on deck is.....well, have you practiced your man over board scream? Me, carefully not thinking about that theoretical super-cavitating SWATH with over 120 knots top speed.

@hphp31416

3 жыл бұрын

@@Starjumper2821 seatbelts were invented by then

@thesovietonionlol2155

3 жыл бұрын

@@Starjumper2821 thing is,they are so small some don’t even have a deck

@Prestiged_peck

2 жыл бұрын

@@Starjumper2821 simple, tethers everywhere.

I feel like with campaign, it' be a good idea to have a task force composed entirely of 40+ knot ships, with a battlecruiser thrown in there to give it some bite. It would serve as an extremely fast reactionary force, both independently, and by being able to rapidly bolster a slower task force.

@beanny39

2 жыл бұрын

It doesn't matter, sad to say.

It's a racing boat. 11:23 No, it's a drift car! :-D Basically, it's a big PT boat.

@greycatturtle7132

3 жыл бұрын

Yea

*is getting Arpeggio of Blue Steel vibes from this video* Also that ship is powered by Budlight.

@jamesgroccia644

3 жыл бұрын

What a surprise to see you here. This is MadLad from Discord

@merafirewing6591

3 жыл бұрын

@@jamesgroccia644 Hello there.

@Avetho

3 жыл бұрын

Budlight? I'm getting GrayStillPlays vibes for some reason, like Florida Man built this in his backyard shipyard

60 knots converts to 69.04 mph. Nice

@themanformerlyknownascomme777

3 жыл бұрын

111km per hour

@ZaHandle

3 жыл бұрын

@@themanformerlyknownascomme777 shit’s faster than some cars

@DreadX10

2 жыл бұрын

About 30 m/s

Fast and Furious, naval edition. Captain's name must be Torretto.

I remember reading about a British fast cruiser. She was built for minelaying, the plan was to nip in after it was too late for the luftwaffe to respond, and be far enough away by dawn that they couldn't be attacked. IIRC she was designed for 46 knots and could go faster. They were often used as fast transports. In the Falklands war, the US were moving a carrier group to the area to pressure the British, and one of these came up behind it, enroute themselves. The yanks, not wanting to be shown up, increased speed. Finally, the carrier was pounding along at maximum speed with what escorts could keep up in that sea state and the cruiser came past with the nautical equivalent of a cheery wave and a "we'll see you when you get there" signal before haring off into the distance.

Stealth: “Fortunately, the enemy heavy cruiser has yet to fire at me.” Just as then two shells fly right over him.

Deja vu i have been in this sea before, higher on the waves, and i know its my time to sail, hailing you and the treasure is a mystery, standing on my deck, its so hard when im listing woooaaah.

That ship turning = Ultimate Admiral Dreadnoughts: Tokyo Drift 🤣

Its goes nowhere, but it goes there fast! .... So that is how the Car Makers, make Car Data Sheets

Ships like that would do well in targeted convoy attacks. As far as the campaign goes, I’m betting it won’t be seeing even the most basic of campaign until we’re well into 2022.

@Prestiged_peck

2 жыл бұрын

This comment aged well /s

@ZaHandle

2 жыл бұрын

Correct, there’re only two factions as of January 2022

@Prestiged_peck

2 жыл бұрын

@@ZaHandle but we saw said basic campaign months ago

70% of the ship is engine and the rest are funnels.. Game: Sorry, but it looks like your engine is going to be inefficient.

@charlesc.9012

2 жыл бұрын

Mostly because they still think you need boilers to raise steam, or that diesel engines don't make much power at the kind of RPM it constantly reaches

GAS GAS GASS GOTTA STEPONTHEGAS

@atigerclaw

3 жыл бұрын

_Toniiiight I flyyy!!!!_

That battlecruiser would be an amazing raider or convoy hunter. With that level of speed you would always be in control of the engagement time and place. Terror ship!

@charlesc.9012

2 жыл бұрын

Burns more fuel than the Iowa herself. Being American, she can't cross the pacific, and it would make more sense in the Regia Marina and especially the Austrian navy

man heavy cruisers for britain need its own super stuctures badly and its own hull i will say county class cruisers

Very impressive! I’m surprised none of the comments mention the super high speed “cruiser” Wirbelwind from the Naval Ops series since she was also capable of 70-90 knots depending on the game.

we need some eurobeat for this speedy boi

OH MY GOODNESS I just built my own version of this (it had 70% engine efficiency :P) and that battle I just had against a light cruiser was the most fun Ive had in UAD in a long while! dodging gunfire, missing my first double torps, stalling while desperately reloading, swinging in for a final attack without smoke and half my ship flooded, fixing the flooding just in time to get within 2km just when my smoke came back, rushing in at max speed and launching my torps just outside their priming (non exploding) zone (1/4km i think) and one shotting that ship. Most fun ive had in a long time in UAD

**Ship enters turn** **Eurobeat starts playing** Multi-hull dorifuto?!

congratulations? you've made a fast attack craft/PT boat The concept has been explored :D

Naval Designer:How fast do you want this ship to be Sir? FDR:Yes

Drop it back to 55 knots, triple torps at both ends, and drive straight through the enemy fleet

Nations with the best Hull Forms for each type: French BBs (up to 119), British BCs (up to 125), Italian cruisers (up to 124), and the Shimakaze hull (115).

This is great I started laughing when I saw the caption 😂🤣👍

Try placing the funnels across the beam, it can allow more deck space either for even more funnels or any armaments (if you don't have any already)

I don’t play at all, but it makes me think of the sneaky bois submarine kill teams you made in that wwii game you were playing a while back. Send two of those with a group and use them to prey upon transports maybe, or in the assassin group you mentioned. Use one to lay a smokescreen and strike from it with the other one. It’s certainly the only ship you can use that will keep up with one.

Love your content bro

This is the meme ship. Someone please edit deja vu to that clip.

60kts, pretty speedy! If you can reach 88kts it's back to the future. Hopefully take your modern Dreadnought to fight the French at Trafalgar, shouldn't take long to win that. Then it's off to kick the Armada's arse.

"You have the speed to outrun the shells" --Yuro Edit: If I can ask, does having 0 inches of armor virtually make your hull made of air? Like if you're building this thing, it will only have the engine, deck, funnels, towers, torpedo, and guns?

@Mooncricketstinks

3 жыл бұрын

Basically everything full penetrates at any angle. Paper ship made of real paper.

@Kneb587

3 жыл бұрын

0 inches of armor just means there's no armor, there's still the metal of the hull, it just won't protect against anything. Even a pistol round can punch through it at that point.

@D8W2P4

3 жыл бұрын

@@Kneb587 >Even a pistol round can punch through it at that point. Ships this size are too heavily armored simply because they are too heavy to be made out of sheetmetal and need to be made from plates of metal.

@Kneb587

3 жыл бұрын

@@D8W2P4 i believe you might be mixing up hardened armor plate (of which that design has exactly none) and structural steel (which is not made to stop bullets of any kind). And given that it was designed to go as fast as possible they wouldn't be wasting any spare metal on making the hull thicker than absolutely necessary, and while I'm no engineering expert I'm also certain that a hull made only of a single layer of structural steel could be pierced by practically *any* handheld firearm. Because that's exactly what has happened any time anyone has fired on an unarmored ship, no mater the size.

@D8W2P4

3 жыл бұрын

@@Kneb587 As the police that killed Bonnie and Clyde found out in preparing for their ambush, early Ford cars are bullet proof to .45 ACP. Which is just sheet metal for the body, yes thick sheet metal but still just sheet metal. Now while I'm no ship building expert I have seen what ships are made out of and it ain't thin. Nevermind the simple considerations of weight tell me they're gonna need to make the ships out of something heavier than sheet metal.

In the interest of nit-picking accuracy, a volley of ten shots at 0.5% hit chance each has a 95.1% chance of completely missing. It's just that sometimes they'll hit with more than one shell in a volley. It also means they'd have to fire fourteen volleys to get a 50% chance to land at least one hit.

In the words of Jeremy Clarkson: "SPEED AND POWER"

the hyper fast DD might still work well and possibly better at 50 knots which will still pretty much outrun anything and just might offer up a degree of survivability above better firepower. at such speeds, gunnery is still going to be Aim optional! so focus on Torps with the best and fastest type you can load leaving the single mount 2" popgun just for giggles or the odd Transport. as part of a larger fleet action, it could be deployed as a headhunter running in a stand alone division of 3-5 ships that can use their speed to flank the opponent who is already engaged with your other elements allowing them to dash in and dump a pile of Fast Torps before executing a rapid withdrawal under smoke to reload. the alternative would be Convoy Raider in the Campaign as these ships are cheap compared to a CH or BC needing far less resources to operate as well as a much faster build time. I can accept engine efficiency in the mid/high 90's if it gives me 1 more twin Torp launcher.

Can you make a video on the most accurate ship you can make? I think it would be cool

Admiral Fisher would be proud.

I’m surprised you didn’t try to paint it red either.

I found it weird how such limit is not a thing in Navel Academy mode. The displacement limitation is only in custom battle which shouldn't be since it is pretty much free-build sandbox mode.

For freedom!

thats the biggest torpedo i've ever seen

I got excited that this was my ship request but alas it wasn’t🥲

im pretty shure the poor spotting and concealment is something to do with your smoke interference from all those funnels

this thing basically is the Sonic of destroyers

I do have a couple of question coming with this "super fast" destroyer, does the Terrible (fastest ship during trials with 44 knots) 5.47 inches (138,9 mm) main battery has been added yet. Anyhow, still funny to watch, have a nice day

I would want to see a video where you try to build the fastest battlecruiser possible. *Armament restrictions* 3×16 inch triple barrel main guns or 4×15 inch double barrel main guns everything else can be an open design. *Fleets* Both fleets are 1940 Your fleet shall be comprised of 1 BB, 2 BC, 6 CA, 4 CL, and 12 DD. The opposing fleet shall be comprised of 2 BB, 1 BC, 8 CA, and 14 DD from a nation of your choosing.

@Stealth17Gaming

3 жыл бұрын

With that many ships it's going to be a complete mess.

@urbanestdog4580

3 жыл бұрын

@@Stealth17Gaming I'm just expecting a high usage of flanking due to your speed, although you can reduce the amount of smaller ships (CA and lower) as you see fit.

Interesting

The cost/ month during the ship building maybe indicates something in the future.

@Stealth17Gaming

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah campaign feature.

Hmmmm, a extreme fast response recon/courier destroyer

Hi stealth, can you make a CL kinda like Kitakami at some point. I don’t care what exactly you go for as far as guns, the only requirement I have is that it must have more torpedo launchers (as in the turret as a whole) then gun turrets.

@invadegreece9281

3 жыл бұрын

Ok thx

All the Matari mains on EVE be like, "Bruh, you're doing it wrong." But for real, if your ship can will burn down if it catches fire 100% of the time, then not being hit by 99.95% of shells is NOT GOOD ENOUGH, when you consider than it's common for a ship to fire several thousands of shells over the course of 30 minutes. For speed tanking to work, you'd need an average evasion of around 99.995% over the course of an engagement.

Still waiting for Nevada class hulls…

Man the thing is so fast it like a car

You could have gone 55kts and done more with the ship, and those bonuses would have still been absurd.

I mean, battlecruisers being fast is what they are supposed to be. They are supposed to run down cruisers. That's why Battlecruisers are more expensive then Battleships. Pure Engine power

the fastest WW2 era ship was a french DD with 45 knots.

You need a battle ship that can drift.. like in the Battleship movie

@Stealth17Gaming

3 жыл бұрын

Didn't they drop anchor to do that?

@monkeykingenma

3 жыл бұрын

@@Stealth17Gaming they did

Nice,nvm,my mistake

Why isn't this possible anymore? I guess devs decided 51 knots is maximum, now?

Can u try with light and heavy cruisers hulls next time? I have a theory that at least 1 hull can do 45knots or more

@Stealth17Gaming

3 жыл бұрын

You didn't watch the full video.

@GunsligerSafiro

3 жыл бұрын

@@Stealth17Gaming I'm 💯 sure I did, I might be wrong but when u on lock every hull some time the speed is drop to the mid settings

@GunsligerSafiro

3 жыл бұрын

@@Stealth17Gaming yes, I seen when u do the other hulls at the end, but what I'm asking is if u can do a scenario with the 45 knots in mind and that type of hull that I was saying

Sorry, I haven't bought the game yet. Could you get to 60km without all the funnels? And that would shave the weight? Balance funnels with the arms/armor/tech and just don't turn so much. you'll still get the speed bonus for approach and enemy chance to hit. Still not much to work with, but at least some and some range for campaign. I'll have to try that.

Counter blockade capital ship ambusher.

This destroyer uses Red Bull and Monster Energy instead of oil

11:01 450k hp in a ship weighing in at 3500 tons.

Shouldve named it paolo emilio.

Isnt there a better funnel?

bruh 60 knots what the fuck the way she drifts with her hull underwater lmao

so basically its drifting

now do that again this time the SLOWEST battleship in the game

@Starjumper2821

3 жыл бұрын

So Hashima?

@ZaHandle

3 жыл бұрын

the 5 knots death island

What game is this

This game has to overthink the funel thing that is if you build a car whit 2 100cm holes just for airflow and tell someone its just half of what it needs even if the whole ship is an engine 2 funels shoud be enough

Nice Meme ship!!!

How light can it get ? Wouldn't it be easier if the ship was as light as possible ? To start from 1700tonnes ,

@Stealth17Gaming

3 жыл бұрын

Tried that. Less displacement means less room for engines, even though the ship is lighter. You need the displacement I used.

world of warships in a nutshell

Why not just use the ship as a very large and fast torpedo and ram the enemy?

@Stealth17Gaming

3 жыл бұрын

Expensiv torp. It will probably sink before the target sinks.

*Paolo Emilio wants to know your location*

Put thaw armour on deck

Why not just use fewer of the heavier funnels which have larger capacity they give you a higher percentage an engine efficiency for less weight if you have to use Fewer

@Stealth17Gaming

3 жыл бұрын

No they don't. Check another comment of mine for the math.

@USS_Grey_Ghost

3 жыл бұрын

@@Stealth17Gaming ok just curious

Edit: the standard angled funnel does not offer enough marginal benefit to overcome the weight costs, but I will leave this comment as a hypothetical for discussing funnels in general. Would it not have been more weight-efficient to use fewer larger funnels than several smaller ones? Since the standard angled funnel was only 50% more weight, if it offered more than 50% more efficiency per funnel, surely that would have been the better option, yes?

@Stealth17Gaming

3 жыл бұрын

I did the math on it. The 75 ton funnel (smallest) has the most exhaust/ton at 0,3933 110 ton funnel - 0,3181 exhaust/ton 140 ton funnel - 0,3214 exhaust/ton 156 ton funnel - 0,3077 exhaust/ton

@jordananderson2728

3 жыл бұрын

@@Stealth17Gaming Which is why I corrected myself in the edit. I had noticed that your mouse hovered for just a moment over the 110-tonne funnel, and caught that it gave an exhaust value of 35, which is not enough marginal benefit for the weight increase. Also, I understand the desire for the largest weapons possible, but wouldn't it have been better to use a few 21-inch torpedoes rather than two or three 24-inch launchers?

Now mod it to battleship class, 200000t

fisher's wet dream

no armor is the best armor.

so all your saying is the game a Janky as hell and not correct at all waste of time or money ect