So when will the court decide? I predict they will decide 9-0 against Colorado.

@penguinswithwifi

2 ай бұрын

⭐️

Thank You for having this broadcast.

@billyboy9436

3 ай бұрын

Trump's attorneys missed a great Article 4, Section 4, argument - a guarantee of a State's Republican form of government. FE, if Trump is disqualified in Colorado he could lose the Presidency, which would be adverse to Texas, which voted overwhelmingly for Trump as President - hence denying it its republican form of government.

@robonekokun

3 ай бұрын

​@billyboy9436 the GOP has the responsibility to make sure their candidate is qualified to represent the republican party. If they don't then they fail their base and an independent can represent a Republican because they are also on the ballot.

@patriciamartinez-lx8dy

3 ай бұрын

This hearing by the Supreme Court was discouraging. I have more respect for Republican former federal judge Luttig for telling the American people the truth about the 14th amendment section 3. He should have been one of the attorneys questioning the Supreme Court.

@kathleenmichelet6493

3 ай бұрын

I don't see the relevance to the 3 issue before the court.

@kathleenmichelet6493

3 ай бұрын

​@@billyboy9436 the decision will define the Disqualification Clause and will effect all future limitations of section 3. Trump is just the test case.

Best way to get news, straight from the source. Thank you @CSPAN, just want facts, not pundits.

@chriswest2290

3 ай бұрын

Absolutely

Why did we not see this in the media? Thank you for airing !

Thank you for posting this. The world is watching the supreme court.

@jjohannesbalbin

3 ай бұрын

Trump no.1 poor man him against the government.youre gonna win mr pres.

@FJB_The_BigGuy

3 ай бұрын

The next hearing will be that President Trump had immunity for actions he took while in office.

I AM CANADIAN AND I AM PRAYING FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. STAY STRONG AMERICANS AND STAND UP FOR YOUR RIGHTS. FIGHT BACK.

@jonburrows2684

3 ай бұрын

Yeah, can't believe Canadians surrendered to a bunch of freaks, God haters and Nazi liberals.

@jimborghini2761

3 ай бұрын

Watch President Trump win the Nevada caucus tonight by a mile. TRUMP IS A LEGEND. TRUMP2024!!!

@user-sy8rb2ni9j

3 ай бұрын

Which once?

@Jlawson310

3 ай бұрын

The conservatives. The liberals are the ones trying to take it away.

@chris9898776

3 ай бұрын

Some of us do care about our rights. That’s why we DON’T want Trump anywhere near any government office whatsoever.

Thank you for this unadulterated hearing.

@xxcelr8rs

3 ай бұрын

Now if the fake news monopoly would dare stop censuring by omission.

I'm proud to say I listened to the whole arguments. Did a lot of rewinding to make sure I understood what was being said. The ruling will most definitely be 9-0 in favor of Donald Trump, and any justice who does otherwise will lose all credibility.

@Troyphy

3 ай бұрын

@@doublewhopper67 The most important argument that all of the justices agreed upon is the language of the 14th amendment specifically where it says: one is disqualified from *"holding"* office for engaging in insurrection. The action being taken against Trump (taking his name off ballot) is election interference and it infringes his ability to run for office. He can still *run* for office even if he did engage in Insurrection- the amendment disqualifies him from *holding* office. He should be able to run for office, and if he gets elected, then CONGRESS, will have a vote to disqualify him from office.

@teresaromanski3925

3 ай бұрын

They don't have any credibility already, and trump tried to overthrow the 2020 election.

Trump Opening: 8:00 Anderson Opening: 1:01:40 Colorado Opening: 2:01:12 Trump Rebuttal: 2:14:14

@alancashman1054

3 ай бұрын

Legend

@fortusvictus8297

3 ай бұрын

2:01:00 Colorado SG opening.

@fortusvictus8297

3 ай бұрын

2:14:00 closings

@icemorebutts

3 ай бұрын

U da man

@LifeLiver.

3 ай бұрын

💡 this is True Democracy (SC =9-0 ) -- let the people of the USA decide whom they want ! DJT by a friggin LANDSLIDE in November.💋Sweet Latinas for TRUMP ! !

What a magnificent country this is - that allows freedom of speech and the people's access to the legal arguments in the Supreme court1

@pauz9776

3 ай бұрын

I smell B S , our criminal justice system is for the elite, no one welcomed a court case in their life

@brockmcintosh4508

3 ай бұрын

Now all they need to do is allow cameras, as they do in lower courts

@AntiMasonic93

3 ай бұрын

The Biden White House has disabled the comment section on its KZread channel. Now, I feel like speech has be suppressed. This is a 1st amendment constitutional violation that warrants heightened judicial scrutiny by the trier of fact.

@samratdas7590

3 ай бұрын

In India , Supreme Court of India do live hearing in important cases both audio and video hearing , India have more freedom of speech than US

@avatarinum

3 ай бұрын

@brockmcintosh4508 For the sake of transparency, I agree with you. Because I do believe that it would (aside from being polarizing) allow the American public to actually view what takes place with their own eyes. I do tend to believe that the media does not do its due diligence. Controversy sells, and they know that. I believe that although not all journalists are bad, the majority of them now forego all of the truth when reporting events such as this with Trump's case. They should not be swayed by personal beliefs. If he's guilty, then be fair and honest, and if he's innocent, then say so without any bias whatsoever.

Thank you for the broadcast. I appreciate it!

Half a million views, for CSPAN! That's very encouraging that citizens are taking this much of an interest in today's culture.

It is particularly funny for Mr. Murray to say that it is "unlikely" that a lower court could reach a different conclusion than SCOTUS the same actual day that Hawaii said: "Nope, the SCOTUS ruling on the Second Amendment doesn't apply to Hawaii!"

@michellec1866

3 ай бұрын

😂😂😂if Supreme Court agreed with the lower court, they would have taken the case.😂

@nuanil

3 ай бұрын

@@michellec1866 history would prove you horribly wrong. They regularly take cases where they agree with the opinion simply to set the precedent.

@Yellowbellyshoe

3 ай бұрын

Trump won the end

@GeorgeSavrille

3 ай бұрын

It's even funnier that the only reason you know of that story is because it was in the news. Meaning that it was newsworthy. Because it doesn't happen often. Which means that Murray's position was correct; it's unlikely. None of which even address the completely incorrect comparison being made in your comment.

@gamemediafan1714

3 ай бұрын

​@nuanil With some cases this is true, but not most of them. There's a lot of cases where SCOTUS will just not hear them because they see it as a waste of time.

"Integrity is the very breath of justice. Confidence in our law, our courts and in the administration of justice is our supreme interest. No practice must be permitted to prevail which invites toward the administration of justice a doubt or distrust of its integrity." Wheeler, Chief Justice of Connecticut, 1928

@TheJoshgacks

3 ай бұрын

Unfortunately Justice Thomas has been doing his very best to undermine the integrity or at the least the appearance of it in the scotus.

@douglashanlon1975

3 ай бұрын

​@@TheJoshgacksyou must be racist

@touchmeharder1737

3 ай бұрын

​@@TheJoshgacks and that very point is why there are more than 1 justice. Not all the power is in ones hands. Hes made some very good decisions and some bad ones. No one is without flaws. 5-9 is good as it balances the power better and forces discussion

@TheJoshgacks

3 ай бұрын

​@@touchmeharder1737 no, that's what recusal is for. His wife's ties to the insurrection should mean he recuses himself. But corruption is as corruption does and he won't.

@touchmeharder1737

3 ай бұрын

@@TheJoshgacks im so happy supreme court will rule on yay or nay to insurrection. Because you can stop calling it an insurrection anf your entire arguement is dissolved

This Jason guy should be a politician instead with the amount of time he is not answering the question and replying back with completely something else

Jonathan Mitchell is a brilliant attorney…..What a mind.

@johnkaylor8670

3 ай бұрын

I totally agree with you. I had never even heard of him, let alone saw him before this. But I did happen to read a couple "new articles" about his supposed performance in this hearing before watching the actual hearing. Those articles were obviously left-wing hit pieces because I came away thinking that Trump's attorney in this historic case must have been a real dud. But when I listened to the entire hearing in detail, and very carefully, I was totally impressed with Mr. Mitchill's polished, commanding knowledge of the law and flawless, unhesitating delivery.

@FJB_The_BigGuy

3 ай бұрын

His delivery was legally sound. The Colorado legal team was tentative and, for the most part, constructed ad hoc legal theories to suit the occasion. They know this case should not have been brought.

An insurrection that only lasted a few hours without being armed with tour guides WOW the one we had 155 years ago was a lot different from what I read

@o0o_OutCast_o0o

3 ай бұрын

Thing is, the only ones calling it an insurrection or extremist both citizen, elected politician, and opinion news media keeping it going. The government, in charge, knows better. I predict this is about to be a 9-0 vote, making fools out of all of them.

@ColorOfExcellence

3 ай бұрын

You were there?

@michaeljordan5972

3 ай бұрын

@@ColorOfExcellence did I need to be it was on every channel if you didn't see it your either blind or dumb

@michaeljordan5972

3 ай бұрын

@@ColorOfExcellence did I need to be it was all over the television every channel you'd have to be deaf and blind to not see and hear it

@alterbr33d

3 ай бұрын

They broke into the room where the election was being certified but Pence had already fled, that was an attempt to over throw the government. In Germany, the Beer Hall Putsch didn't even make it past the capital steps and Hitler was arrested and put in prison for 5 years, after he got out they had no law banning insurrectionists from running for Chancellor, he ran and won. After the war Germany made a law banning insurrectionists from running for Chancellor. Do we have a similar law? Don't you realize how serious this is?

Facts and law that is what they supreme court should focus on... opinions or threats should never matter.

@russk8091

3 ай бұрын

@iwantabetterworld1759 True. They need to go by what's written in the constitution instead of twisting themselves into pretzel logic.

@frpgplayer

3 ай бұрын

Some believe the CO court twisted the pretzel. 3 of the 7 judges, all Democrats, did not agree with 4. That's a lousy 4-3 decision that it takes only 1 person to flip it back. Having read the 3 dissenting Democrat judges, their arguments are actually being argued now

@mikemorgan8588

3 ай бұрын

Democrats are doing great harm while trying to win a election by kicking candidates off State ballots. Make no mistake this is a DNC plan.

@LuigiMordelAlaume

3 ай бұрын

​@@frpgplayerI didn't read the dissenting opinion but the argument that the president and people in congress aren't officers is ludicrous. And to say the person can be elected but then "pending approval" from congress is just stupid - what happens *when* 2/3rds of congress doesn't override the disqualification? Don't get me wrong, I think this should probably be reversed because it would be a dangerous precedent, but if this doesn't meet the requirements for disqualification then idk wtf would.

@touchmeharder1737

3 ай бұрын

​@@LuigiMordelAlaume hes not disqualified if he wasnt impeached for his insurrection. There was a way to properly convict trump it didnt work.

I love being able to watch history in motion. thank you c span

It's hilarious that when they are trying to hold the black signs up toward the end, all we can really see is "TRUMP" "TRUMP"!!! Lol.. thanks for the advertisements, guys!

Listen to our fellow Canadians stand up America fight back

@ChristopherRunyon-ql5qe

3 ай бұрын

We are!

@RobertStevensService

3 ай бұрын

Speak for yourself, anybody who supports Trump must be unbelievably stupid or gullible. The man is a depictable human being. This Canadian does not support him.

@LuigiMordelAlaume

3 ай бұрын

Yeah but fighting back is extremely difficult when 2/3rds of SCOTUS supports a megalomaniac narcissist that fantasizes about becoming emperor of earth. We'll win the fight at the ballot box.

@laborspy

3 ай бұрын

@@ChristopherRunyon-ql5qereally? I have seen zero fight in anyone. A lot of social media smack talk. In reality who the president is make zero on my daily life.

@ChristopherRunyon-ql5qe

3 ай бұрын

Yes!

in the end The founding fathers did not want a king or anything to do with a king.

@theghostofrethsich2813

3 ай бұрын

Then they would really hate the permanent state because nobody elected them

@Ooops.x

3 ай бұрын

You might want to tell Biden that because he thinks he’s king .he thinks he’s king shit but he’s not he’s just a piece of 💩

@wtfdoyoumean9341

3 ай бұрын

And what does that have to do with the subject at hand, removing someone from ballots?

@johnmadison3472

3 ай бұрын

@@wtfdoyoumean9341 Everything

@sofakingrad3530

3 ай бұрын

@@johnmadison3472 So king Joe Biden not only kicked JFK and all the other democrats that wanted to run against him out of the party and off the ballots, he also wants to get rid of Trump or anybody that will run against him in the general election too. Sounds like Joe is more of a fascist/Marxist than a king.

Who picked Murray to present oral arguments before the Supreme Court? This clown couldn't win a high school debate.

@donamills863

3 ай бұрын

Thatz's what happend when a lawyer has no case.

@sethblank3139

3 ай бұрын

When you try to use emotion rather than facts, that's what happens

@Shineon83

3 ай бұрын

Agreed.…Rarely do you hear every Justice on the Court repeatedly shred an attorney’s arguments, like they did Murray…I almost felt sorry for him as Sotomayor & Jackson played “tag team,” with him, interrupting every argument he tried to make, their voices full of disbelief ( even sarcasm )

@MrWeeble19

3 ай бұрын

Exactly. That 🤡 would be okay if he was only doing what his client wants. But he ACTUALLY believes his buuuuull💩💩💩💩.😂😂😂😂

@user-hx3ms4gu3u

3 ай бұрын

maybe, but he was handed an absolute dud. it is a shame there are almost no repercussions to this whole 'git trump' bs. the left and their guards are an absolute clownshow.

Thanks, C-SPAN.

It’s almost like there needs to be some sort of set standard for what insurrection is and how to determine if is person engaged in that act. Say like a law and a criminal conviction on that law.

@douglashanlon1975

3 ай бұрын

Lol lawyer can twist any definition you come up with...in either direction

@Aaron-fo1sy

3 ай бұрын

@@douglashanlon1975 right. That’s not 100% true. But it seems like that’s why you should use what’s in a statute. Instead of letting each court make up its own definition. Then used an agreed upon process that is due to each person instead of letting each court determine that

@xxcelr8rs

3 ай бұрын

@@Aaron-fo1sy The barehanded Shaman by his lonesome as leader could take the Marines is the narrative. That sure was a close one.

@joeyh9116

3 ай бұрын

There is. Several Jan 6 defendants have been found guilty of insurrection. The DC Supreme Court has just ruled Trump isn’t above the law so perhaps charges will be filed

@9xmeysj

3 ай бұрын

Go back in time and tell the drafters of the 14th Amendment your thoughts.

Thank you Andy!

@jeremywong2429

3 ай бұрын

Not doing anything after swearing to uphold and defend the constitution, which resulted in the death of several.....not guilty?!! Wow

No one has been charged with insurrection.

Actually, I was very impressed with justice Jackson and her non-partisan astute inquiry! Also justice Gorsich was very impressive as well. There was not a 'weak player' in this hearings and all the justices proved why they serve on the US Supreme Court with their brilliant collective analysis.

Suddenly everyone is a legal expert ..

@King-a-ling

3 ай бұрын

Im sure you are speaking as a cult member

@jonburrows2684

3 ай бұрын

Just know it all racist, antiamerican, threat to democracy, baby killing, God hating, antiamerican, nazi DEMONcrats. Love how the SCOTUS said today that Trump was denied due process.

@sonotdown998

3 ай бұрын

There would be very few comments on KZread without the Dunning-Kruger Effect-on all sides.

@Quantum3691

3 ай бұрын

🤣😂🤣😂

@ty567100

3 ай бұрын

@@King-a-ling And you're speaking as a typical M@R@N...Isn't that right KING A LING?.....I'm sure you can't understand that!

1:00:05 - 1:01:25 every American needs to hear this.

@haroldwhitney6130

2 ай бұрын

The nine Americans that are the Supreme Court did hear it, and they decided 9-0 that Democracy needs to be defended. I agree with them. What do you think about their decision?

Timestamps! 00:00 - Understanding the Situation 07:44 - Legal Disputes and Interpretations 12:18 - Congressional Role and Qualifications 19:11 - Enforcement Acts and Precedents 25:21 - Impact of Court Decisions 32:16 - Enforcement Mechanisms 36:12 - Historical Context and Precedents 41:34 - Constitutional Interpretation 46:08 - Debates on Disqualification 50:44 - Congressional Legislation 55:23 - Removal of Federal Officials 59:57 - Framers' Intent and Legislation 1:06:07 - State Authority and Election Procedures 1:15:18 - Supreme Court Review and State Powers 1:24:31 - Congressional Authority and Insurrection 1:31:30 - Judicial Process and Uniformity 1:39:11 - State Disqualification and Federal Law 1:45:25 - Preserving Electoral Integrity 1:53:09 - Safeguarding Democracy 2:00:02 - Legal Proceedings and Eligibility 2:08:52 - Ensuring Due Process 2:15:07 - Impact on Executive Actions 2:21:03 - Post-Oral Arguments Reactions 2:25:52 - Concerns on Constitutional Rights 2:33:38 - Policy Positions and Criticisms 2:38:25 - Presidential Immunity 2:46:16 - Election Security and Trust in Democracy

i miss being able to watch C Span. I have youtube tv and I don't think they offer it.

Whos been charged with insurrection????......no one......

@danaday7266

3 ай бұрын

👍🏽👍🏽

@lamacumeca

3 ай бұрын

ENGAGED IN, not CHARGED or CONVICTED

@AndreVeaseyJr

3 ай бұрын

I looked it up to confirm too. He was acquitted of inciting an insurrection by the Senate.

@robinhood20253

3 ай бұрын

Yeah many were and convicted. Semantics are a puny argument.

@user-sy8rb2ni9j

3 ай бұрын

Ok doll. You obviously can read only captions lol @@AndreVeaseyJr

That last caller is not very well informed

@IgBtac0

3 ай бұрын

How so?

@Tina-Trinity

3 ай бұрын

​@@IgBtac0the number of indictments does not automatically indicate guilt....as caller indicated. A logical person knows that and also knows that it does not indicate innocence or conspiracy. It's a mute point.

Thank you C-Span.

Thank you for allowing citizens to hear the case.

TRUMP2024 TRUMP2024 TRUMP2024

@rickdworsky6457

3 ай бұрын

In prison

@LaurieAboardMarVida

3 ай бұрын

🤡🤡🤡

@jimborghini2761

3 ай бұрын

@@rickdworsky6457 😅😅😅😅 Very original.

Listeners of scotus arguments should not use the frequency of justice inquiry as a gauge of efficacy or accuracy of arguments

Thank you for this report.

Gotta love the same people asking about precedent when they’re all on record saying that RoeV.Wade was settled law and there was no way they would ever overturn it, and then did.

@adamprater6216

3 ай бұрын

Cause it wasn’t precedent, it was the court at that time making legislation which the court cannot do. Court also said congress should have made it law anytime since roe vs wade. Since congress didn’t, court found it to be wrong for the previous court and sent it back to the states.

@WilliamSt.Clair1399

3 ай бұрын

@@adamprater6216did you miss the part where they are on record saying it is. Are you suggesting that the people who have taught this are less informed than you or I?

@WilliamSt.Clair1399

3 ай бұрын

@@adamprater6216or are you suggesting that these people lied before congress an act that not even theoretically but literally would make them able to be impeached and removed rhemselves? There’s no way around this.

@megamonster1234

3 ай бұрын

The justices who ruled to overturn Roe never said Roe was settled law. Only that it was precedent that carried weight. Let's also not pretend the conservatives justices are the only ones who have overruled precedent though. Sotomayor said the same about previous rulings that were anti-gay marriage during her own confirmation before overturning them. Breyer consistently said he would rule to overturn the death penalty even though SCOTUS had ruled consistently in favor of it for decades.

@monicasolair321

3 ай бұрын

Roe vs Wade was no overturned it was sent back to the states.. Judges uphold the law not make laws.

"We know what's best for you, but we can't trust that you know what's best for you. Therefore, we will remove your constitutional right to vote your own way. Oh and remember, it's all in the name of democracy."

@RisenThe

3 ай бұрын

So I can vote in a 22 year old tech bro for POTUS? Either we have rules for people seeking office, or we don't.

@haroldwhitney6130

3 ай бұрын

​@@RisenTheYes, we do have rules, and the Supreme Court's job is to interpret them, so that they may be applied in a way that is consistent with US Constitution. They've heard from each group, and they will decide on this case. What rules haven't been followed?

@RisenThe

3 ай бұрын

@@haroldwhitney6130 The rule: You cannot hold public office after engaging in an insurrection. It's already been established on the record, for all eternity, that it is "clear and conclusive", Trump engaged in an insurrection. In my view, there is enough evidence to get him with treason, or seditious conspiracy, at the very least. After seeing associate justice Thomas fail to recuse himself (his wife was involved in the coup attempt), any ruling from that corrupt bench on this matter is fraudulent, in my opinion.

Does anyone remember the” insurrection” during the Kavanaugh hearings? banging on the Supreme Court harassing senators in their elevator disrupting Q&A?

@matthewneubeck4421

3 ай бұрын

Are any of those people former oath takers now running for president of the United States?

@davidbrown6965

3 ай бұрын

Please I'm not saying you're stupid you just have bad luck when it comes to thinking 😂

@tonyd.5151

3 ай бұрын

Even IF all of that was as real as you imagine it, it has NOTHING to do with what the SC is listening to today. Zero. None.

@blove142

3 ай бұрын

It’s OK you see the world through your leftist lens, where “words are violence, “but actual violence is just” free speech!”………” believe all women”” silence is violence” trans women, are women.!” And other such asinine phrases!

@King-a-ling

3 ай бұрын

Spoken like a true Trump cult follower

I'd like to be one of the first to say welcome back to the White House president Trump

@alancroft6928

Ай бұрын

Can I be the second. Trump 2024

Colorado lost the case, I can see it a mile away

@adamcooper4188

3 ай бұрын

NEVADA? MAINE ?

@srdf990

3 ай бұрын

​@@adamcooper4188 they'll be challenged eventually.

One vote per person not ballot harvesting change people vote.

@bradandrews7611

3 ай бұрын

@@dbptwg No more freedom of speech in this country. Media is brainwashing people a sure way of thinks. Clinton was destroying 30000 emails was not put into jail. No justice at all is double standard.

@mikeklug3369

3 ай бұрын

​@@dbptwgit's been proven. Ballot harvesting happened out in the open. Thousands found with multiple same name ballots

@magicone9327

3 ай бұрын

Electoral college selects president, so what all the crap about voting anyway?

@jaysonwallker1648

3 ай бұрын

NO electoral college

@bradandrews7611

3 ай бұрын

Found Fathers was smart men to put in electoral college that let only a few states based decided on outcome of President election.

After hearing both Anthony, i can say trump is a good recruiter cuz we all go to school but not the same way.

Someone doesnt get that other courts disregard supreme courts interpretation all the time. Especially with the 2nd amenedment 😂

Removing ANY candidate from a ballot WITHOUT a conviction makes us a banana republic.

@Bobbert153

3 ай бұрын

Have you no eyes?

@chrissauter7501

3 ай бұрын

@@Bobbert153 what are you referring to?

@rigelb9025

2 ай бұрын

And allowing someone like +rµm¶ to even be anywhere near the white house also makes you a banana republic.

@VinceLock

Ай бұрын

@@Bobbert153 Yes, do you? Did he get convicted of a crime? Why do you think he was not convicted? Because they have nothing.

@Bobbert153

Ай бұрын

Read section 3 of the 14th. amendment. It is self-executing, not requiring a conviction of any kind.

I will never understand in America how a court that is suppose to be neutral are filled based on politics.

@Eleerm

3 ай бұрын

Because there is no such thing as neutral. Biases live in all of us.

@santyclause8034

3 ай бұрын

You would think the Bar would nominate who got a shot at teh bench, who got elevated, had some input.

@JTH-hm8ew

3 ай бұрын

The Constitution sets the rules and not bars.

@alholds

3 ай бұрын

lol, you people are dumb!!! Colorado made it political!

@SquirrltheRiddl

3 ай бұрын

@@JTH-hm8ew you clearly see they don't care about the constitution otherwise their arguments would not even have been spoken.

Judge Alito was talking about the Big Man.

Hooo these guys know their stuff! Interesting the intellectual back and forth going on...great job at the Trump Attorney's AND SCOTUS!

So I'm hearing a lot of questions about how it would work practically, and across other states since they're not contesting the self executing part, just the evidentiary requirements that may vary from state to state.

If Griffin's case was correct... What?

@cjohnson8126

3 ай бұрын

Griffin case (1869) is a case from the reconstruction era which held that the 14th amendment is not self executing meaning either congress would have to declare Trump ineligible or would have to delegate the job of deciding his eligibility to the courts by statute. Most would argue however that case should be ignored since it wad heard by a supreme court justice riding circuit and not the whole court and it has very flawed reasoning.

Why U cut it off ?

@mauliebella

3 ай бұрын

Cuz it was spewing bull💩

@douglashanlon1975

3 ай бұрын

Because C-SPAN is an snake head of the government hydra

Time for me to Leave now and dust off my shoes

Colorado got its head handed to it!... This could be a unanimous decision.

@jaytabao98

3 ай бұрын

Unanimous because almost most of them are put in office by Trump?😅

@julietrs

3 ай бұрын

​@@jaytabao98you don't have faith in the rule of law in this country.

@bluewren2

3 ай бұрын

@@jaytabao98 Not so because it is unjust the only reason you think the way you do is because you've been indoctrinated like yuppies.

Jason Murray remotely answered any of the justice’s questions and raised no valid argument to enforce this case. The fact that this case reached this court is laughable. Grateful to hear this argument, however, he wasted their time.

@ccmzadv4879

Ай бұрын

They did not take this on the merit of Murray's argumentation - they took it because it is important debate to put to bed before the election.

When did CSPAN start having commercials? It use to be viewing our government in action was free from commerce.

@pablolasha238

3 ай бұрын

The ads are from KZread not CSPAN I think

@Shineon83

3 ай бұрын

Thank greedy KZread. ( C-Span would like to have no commercials )….I gave in, and purchased KZread Premium-just so I don’t have to deal with commercials.

Ade beberape soalan tentang pendaftaran bisnes nilai dollar,,,,setahu saya pendaftaran bisnes nilai dollar mesti melalui my bisnes ACADEMY serta kursus yg di tetapkan...dalam my bisnes ACADEMY, bisnes school.

Trump 9-0 win 🏆. Period

The court heard the call and hung up on it.🤬

Just a question... Why would CO make a ruling that abnegates all the other state's rights?

@jspr98

3 ай бұрын

Justices decide on whether to let it stand for CO (states rights) or apply it to all states or none at all.

@tulw2728

3 ай бұрын

Easy. Just like Texas, ignoring the judicial system.

@atrailmckinley4786

3 ай бұрын

Well the state of Colorado can say that trump can't be on the ballot but another state can allow him on the ballot. It doesn't hinder the ability of other states to put trump on their ballots

@jthomas7904

3 ай бұрын

​@@atrailmckinley4786 It also allows Biden or ( Whoever) to be removed from a ballot based on "subjective" opinions.

@Ooops.x

3 ай бұрын

@@jspr98 that doesn’t fly with the American people, one state cannot dictate what other states can and cannot do, looks like this is down the toilet already

The fact that the law is so complicated is really a problem

@muuhoang7592

3 ай бұрын

Actually, the lawyers make it complicated by interjecting their interpretation.

@krismm2003

3 ай бұрын

The Constitution is not complicated rather the interpretive approach of overthinking the texts is what creates confusion - the framers of the nation were flawless in their wordcraft.

Could you add more ads please? I could barely hear the arguments

@imgamerful

3 ай бұрын

Use ad block

@wendysuemacdonald

3 ай бұрын

Illusive wording...give me a break. Stop second guessing the Constitution 'cuz you are a criminal. Nothing technical or elusive. Stop with the word run around.

@wendysuemacdonald

3 ай бұрын

Thomas doesn't speak up until Colorado case comes up. No recusal. Why is it NOT clear DJT is an insurrectionist...he spoke it, we saw it & heard it.

What a Load of Rubbish they are saying about D.T he will be back at the white House.

E was waiting to see if any of them were effective in securing the Presidency for him ….. 😢😢😢

Exactly

Kisah kes dalam Chrome,bila di tugaskan untuk menilai mengkaji semua aspek dalsm filem tersebut ,adekah boleh di jadikan kes hak hasasi manusia ,,iaitu wanita atau lelaki...soalan yg di tanya,jika sesiape yg di tugaskan untuk menilai adekah ia kes atau tidak ????

Was Trump convicted of Insurrection? Did I miss something?

@huntingkc1

3 ай бұрын

Nope, never even charged

@Rileyahsom

3 ай бұрын

You don’t need a conviction to see what he did

@cathymartinez2123

3 ай бұрын

No but why not the charge never been chaged of it​@Rileyahsom

@lovly2cu725

3 ай бұрын

YOU TO BE KICKED OFF & ONLY BY US CONGRESS @@Rileyahsom the constitution article 14 section 5 look it up TRY READING

@Aaron-fo1sy

3 ай бұрын

@@Rileyahsomthat’s interesting. Because some people saw the same events and say it’s not an insurrection. It’s seems as if they need some agreed upon due process to reach that conclusion instead of relying on people’s opinions

I’m a Coloradan and despite the way this makes us appear, most of us are deeply disturbed by our local government and this attempt to take away our rights

@Diane-xh7vl

3 ай бұрын

Me as well

@kahlilbt

3 ай бұрын

I'm also a Coloradan and many of us are happy our rights are finally being somewhat protected. The Constitution says no Insurrectionists in office!

@alholds

3 ай бұрын

@@kahlilbtthere was no insurrection! Was he charged? No, so stfu

@kahlilbt

3 ай бұрын

@@alholds scream harder, it's funny

@tannerjones6564

3 ай бұрын

​@@kahlilbt try harder

Listening to these fine people actually give me hope! Politicians and high level government officials have perverted this country But it seems we still have some really pure minds at the Supreme Court and each of these justices seems to be genuinely seeking the truth and nothing else

"He did nothing. Nothing. He did nothing. Nothing. All he wants is Wingstop"

I can't even listen to Jason Murray's argument without rolling my eyes. It must be really tough for the justices to keep a straight face.

@johnkaylor8670

3 ай бұрын

Look at the tortuous exchange Murray had with Justice Gorsuch. Gorsuch had to repeatedly stop and correct him 3 or 4 times in the one question he wanted Murray to address. At one point having to admonish him "I won't ask you again. Put that (point) aside... and answer my specific question" (in so many words). How embarrassing.

Why wasn’t he outside of the court shaking his tambourine this time? Because he’s a coward! 😂😂

@mariannegarvey9524

3 ай бұрын

Other than name calling, which liberals are very good at, give some reasons as to what Trump did to harm all Americans. We can name MANY about what has happened the day biden took office. Or do you only listen to the VIEW or CNN

Ms. Stevenson was the most effective lawyer, in my opinion. She was concise and clear. 👍

@donamills863

3 ай бұрын

Both sides were amateurs.

Murray simply does not know how to listen with nuance and clarity. He became defensive and really angered several of the Justices and rightly so.

Jason Murray is trying his hardest to argue for a case that has zero logic to it.

@SarahH9000

3 ай бұрын

Zero is overrated let’s say negative

@johnkaylor8670

3 ай бұрын

Correct. Any ballot for PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES is OBVIOUSLY "National" in scope - and effect. And for Colorado to assert it has a =state= power to drastically limit the freedom of it's citizens to choose their own NATIONAL candidate for LEADER - is outrageous. They literally think it's ok to disenfranchise millions of American voters in their choice of our Country's LEADER because of their opinion of him. NO individual state has such a powerful "right".

Trump personally appointed a 1/3 of the judges ruling. I'm sure it'll be a fair ruling 😂

@lizaaltizer7775

3 ай бұрын

They’ve ruled against conservative interests repeatedly. What are you talking about? You now who hasn’t though? “Progressive” justices who have ruled in lockstep with what the democrat cult of personality wanted. I’m just waiting today to see if they finally do what is right.

@sconiersclan

3 ай бұрын

Lol. He will find a way to discredit them and say they are poisoned by the Biden administration

@ericp1645

3 ай бұрын

I’m gonna laugh when they vote 9-0.

@santyclause8034

3 ай бұрын

Me too.😊

@phenomenon5854

3 ай бұрын

​@@lizaaltizer7775I love seeing the two party system sheep bicker bout which herd is right

He did nothing?! He had been telling them to get the National Guard for weeks!!!

1:58:59 this part is really making my f****** brain hurt right now😂😂😂

Nobody knew…. Nobody seen…. Nobody heard….

What is funny is that Murray is essentially arguing that the Union states would have trusted the former Confederate states to have unilateral authority to remove Grant from the ballot in 1868 while also having military deployments in the south at the same time to assure fair and equal elections. The fact this is even a Supreme Court case is hilarious.

@ladydeerheart1

3 ай бұрын

It is ridiculous.

@sulrana1812

3 ай бұрын

This is what you get from law schools these days, what a idiot

@richardhenrysr5029

3 ай бұрын

well then you won't mind having any protection of a government to defend you when putin sweeps us up. trump is stupid and putin knows it...and your are helping to lose our democracy.

@nuanil

3 ай бұрын

Under what grounds? The CSA didn't win.

@GoArian

3 ай бұрын

So true….

Exactly gorsuch hinges on some sense of uniqueness as cause for reversal or at minimum inaction on part of scotus

Interesting.

America will never have a King period ‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️

@me-memachine5272

3 ай бұрын

GAHHH! WTF IS THAT THING AS YOUR PROFILE PIC?????

@charleswhite758

3 ай бұрын

Trump for King of the USA! MAGA

@albertomacias7159

3 ай бұрын

Shut up

@russk8091

3 ай бұрын

@@charleswhite758 I would hope you are joking but there are a lot of Americans ready to change our country into a clone of Russia. Some people are incapable of rubbing two thoughts together.

@charleswhite758

3 ай бұрын

@@russk8091 I'm British, we have had kings for over a thousand years. We also have the world's oldest continually running democracy. America becoming a monarchy would not in any way equate to becoming "like Russia". For some reason Americans are taught at school the propaganda that monarchy equates to despotism. Your experience of King George III is very different to ours, we British do not see him as a despot at all.

Leaving out politics, leaving out the facts of the matter, and just deciding to address the right of one state to do this ... this is so purely constitutional that the justices all were probably having a good old time working together on a purely constitutional interpretation of the one thing they love and live for - the constitution.

@CyberDeity01

3 ай бұрын

it IS constitutional, yepper.

@ladydeerheart1

3 ай бұрын

Except they'll have to violate the Constitution in order to side with Trump. Let's see if they "love" the Constituion as much as they love the Federalist Society. You know, the people that pay Supreme Court Justices to take their side.

@roguecomics4775

3 ай бұрын

You are a buffoon if you believe that.

@sulrana1812

3 ай бұрын

I wouldn't argue that the entire supreme court loves the constitution. One of them can't even define what a woman is. I mean I'm not a carpenter but I can define what a table is.

@mortyharenza9854

3 ай бұрын

How can politics be left out of a "Trump" court....never!!

Why is this my 5th time listening to this lol😂😂

Why the leading questions?

When did a insurrection happen I'm lost who got convicted of insurrection

@alrise1776

3 ай бұрын

Nobody did. These people know Trump will absolutely obliterate them this election, just like he did the last time in 2020.

@rodneyharris6070

3 ай бұрын

What planet are you on

@tomb613

3 ай бұрын

Plenty were found guilty of seditious conspiracy which is the same thing. According to Websters dictionary insurrection is:a violent uprising against an authority or government. Similar words: sedition, rebellion, coup, insurgency.

@adamprater6216

3 ай бұрын

@@rodneyharris6070planet earth. You? No one was charged or found guilty of insurrection. Insurrection is a buzzword from the far left love using.

@phenomenon5854

3 ай бұрын

Conviction isn't required under section 3 of the 14th amendment as it doesn't call for a conviction, just the action alone.

How can they call this an insurrection when they refuse to legally charge him for an insurrection. Charge him then.

@MSgt_0699

3 ай бұрын

That's not how it works. The insurrectionists, as officially documented in the courts, have been charged and convicted of their crimes on that day that went towards the act. Trump was impeached twice for treasonous acts, yet "treason" was not the charge.

@KaufmannCo

3 ай бұрын

And even if he’s charged… being charged doesn’t matter. Not until proven guilty and convicted of insurrection. Which he hasn’t been. So I’m genuinely confused as to how (and WHY) they’re using this as their ENTIRE basis for disqualification and removal. If someone DOES understand please feel free to chime in. This isn’t a R vs D debate. It’s constitutional. I only want to know how they can claim ineligible or disqualified and remove him from the ballot based on premise that he committed insurrection when he hasn’t been CONVICTED of insurrection. In fact of the four cases against him - 91 TOTAL CHARGES (2 cases are directly related to the election) and there’s not a single charge of insurrection. So why is it being reported as if he has already been charged, tried, and found guilty? AND how can Colorado use it as a disqualification? If anyone has answers pls let me know. Genuine question. Thanks!

@ScottOlson-0u812

3 ай бұрын

It was a set up. Who storms in without weapons?

@ishcaby1231

3 ай бұрын

@@ScottOlson-0u812 agreed

@sulrana1812

3 ай бұрын

Because they know it won't hold up in court.. The burden of proof of intent would be on the state and they can't prove that.

They need a Talking Stick or something. They keep interrupting each other lol

Imagine the office of the Presidency is not mentioned in article 3....😂

If it's ok to take Trump off, then we can do Biden.

@robonekokun

3 ай бұрын

If Biden orders an angry mob to attack the US capital. If Biden steals millions of dollars and refuses to pay his taxes. If Biden says he has presidential immunity to ignore the Constitution. If Biden says the election is rigged. If Biden is ordered to pay 83million dollars for raping a woman. If Biden wants to be Alcapone. If Biden puts himself before his country and refuses to honor service members who died or was taken prisoner for the UnitedStates of America.

@bradcalhoun8976

3 ай бұрын

No, Its not. Biden didn’t send a violent mob to attack the Capitol and Murder Lawmakers. STFU!

@petercallison5765

3 ай бұрын

Most democrats would actually like that. Please take them both off.

If this goes through I will never recommend a customer to visit Colorado.

@adamcadovius4566

3 ай бұрын

Same state that brought a baker to the SC to try and force him to bake a cake against his religious convictions.

@jreardon5544

3 ай бұрын

Good we dont need more loser R

Even the judge who did griffins case took it back sir omg he even took it back 19:07

< push the icon Freedom

This is what Thomas Jefferson warned the American people about.

"President Trump, were you EVER accused, tried, or convicted of insurrection?" "NO" "Colorado ruling REVERSED, Court adjourned"

@hpenvy1106

3 ай бұрын

You can certainly make the accusation.

@cindyabraham5503

3 ай бұрын

From listening to the conversation between the court and trumps lawyers I don’t see where they really put much emphasis on that.

@chadchucks6942

3 ай бұрын

@@cindyabraham5503he’s posing a hypothetical

@MSgt_0699

3 ай бұрын

That's going to be the crux of this.

@Zane_Zaminsky

3 ай бұрын

Nyet

7:58 STARTS

Which judges are the sharpest in your opinion?

@EbbingTowards

3 ай бұрын

Jackson, Kavanaugh

@adamcooper4188

3 ай бұрын

Jackson

@blakekaveny

3 ай бұрын

I’ve always found gorsuch to be pretty sharp. Do I agree with him a lot no I don’t. But on the cases I have agree with him I found him to very sharp. Specifically the case Bostcok v Clayton county

@bluewren2

3 ай бұрын

@@blakekavenyAgreed not agree?

@blakekaveny

3 ай бұрын

@@bluewren2 Yes I just mistyped it happens