Please click the link to watch our other Weapon Legends videos kzread.info/head/PLEMWqyRZP_Lq9j4Wz2QHo6dptTW3-tdIo Please click the link to watch our other German Systems videos kzread.info/head/PLEMWqyRZP_Lp-QluqKimxcp2fFhBKuCJz Please click the link to watch our other Weapon Legends-Sea videos kzread.info/head/PLEMWqyRZP_LqMGUzwZdeFlgQ9LHuY32ZX

7:40 My uncle worked at the modernization of the 209/1200 and the build of the 214s. It wasn't as much of "economical difficulty" why the second 209 sub wasn't modernized but mostly because it was considered a waste, because the modernization changes were deemed not noteworthy so it was cancelled.

I wonder if the Grease navy ever had to fight rust... Great vid IMO, I really like the detailled information.

Had no idea that Agentine subs could have sunk more british ships including nuclear sub. How could I miss that? India didnt produce anymore of these subs when they had learnt that South Africa had aquired knowledge of the subs from germany. Its strange that Janes doesnt mention this in their yearly books. Janes should know about this. Dont say I know more than Janes.

I appreciate all the time you take to share your work with us.

Good video. A piece of quick inside information: During diving and surfacing, two rudders near the front trim tank are opened. The one on the starboard of these rudders is inclined upwards and is used in the surfacing. In the Turkish Navy, this manoeuvre is called "sancak selamet", which means "the starboard is safety". The one on the portside of these rudders is inclined downwards and is used for diving. In the Turkish Navy, this manoeuvre is called “iskele felaket”, which means "the portside is disaster".

@drewblackmatter6669

2 жыл бұрын

Haram para reklama from one of easy SORENDERS ON AIGEAN WOTERS AT NEAR RODOS HELLENIC TYPE 209 AIP AND LITORAL HANTERS MH70B7ASWF EASY GET BLOCK ONE TURKIS U-BOAT TYPE 209 TCLAS GUR /1400 TON . TURKIS 209T /1400 EASY SARAWOUND FROM HELLENIC FORCES SARENDER WITH FLEARS ..COLOR GREEN AND YELOW. . WE HAVE VIDEO TAPE AND FOTOS . HELLO FROM GOST U-BOAT 209AIP AT ALL AIGEAN AND ELLIS PONDOS. U-BOAT 214AIP HELLENIC NAVY ARE THE REAL FEAR OF THK AND ALSO TURKIS NAVY . HALVAS 😆😅😂😄 Mεθ ορμης ακαθεκτου Και με βημα Προσθες

@habahan4257

2 жыл бұрын

@@drewblackmatter6669 What are you saying, man. I don't understand

Only came across your vids the other day. What can I say? really really impressed!!! fantastic info, subscribed straight away. keep up the fantastic work

great work .thank you .

Excellent channel( weapon detective)for clearly explaining characteristics of weapons and historical background of weapons creation ..this nice video about class 209 submarine built by Germany thanks for sending

great submarine.. great video

1:51 not only that but the geography of the North Sea with Britain lying at its exit towards the open Atlantic whilst Germany was situated at its other end meant the British would always be able to dictate any engagement between the two navies and their still significant advantage in numbers meant they could also dictate the force disparity in any enncounter. The German plan to win WW1 at sea was to lure the British Home Fleet out and wear it down ship by ship - which the British countered by sending out its fleet in force whenever the Germans would take to the North Sea. This also meant the High Seas Fleet was not capable of breaching the naval blockade Britain had erected around the German Bight. U-Boats were a further development of the surface raiders the Germans already used with varying success. Their ability to dive beneath the blockade made it much easier to avoid detection though and soon, German U Boats would try to lock down the Irish Sea just like the Home fleet locked down the North Sea.

As usual great explanation. From which country you are?

Waiting for your video on US2 & US2i

Can you do one on the Leopard 2A6

Bello. 😮

Everybody loves smartasses, I know...but: U 2518 and U 3008, both Typ XXI did war patrols. They sunk nothing. tho.

@WeaponDetective

2 жыл бұрын

Yes, you are right. It would be wrong to say that they had no combat experience instead of saying that they had never sunk a ship. Thanks for the correction.

Plz make one on INS Arihant too

Can you do a video on a129 and t129

Funny, in some of those shots, the sub looks like a Typhoon (because of the sail and the blob between it and the hull)

Egyptian subs are 1400mod not 1100

MAD sensors... always crazy for submarines.

Please do videos on 212 and 216

@WeaponDetective

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks for your interest. These submarines are also on our list. We will prepare their videos as soon as possible. But, unfortunately, our submarine videos are not popular. Currently, we are focusing on popular systems. So, they will wait for a while.

Makassar-class landing platform dock

I would have the worst anxiety on a submarine. Wouldn't matter how big it was or what country built it , I would be a panicked wreck when submerged...

@benghazi4216

2 жыл бұрын

The biggest Russia has built has a pool and sauna, so maybe that could make you relax ^^

you have some mistakes: the peruvians u209s dont have capacity to launch harpoon (they dont even have this missiles), they have 6 u209 but 2 are in refit with haul cut and maybe dont sail again. only greece, turkish and corean u209s have the sub harpoon capacity. the 2 chileans u209 are type 1400 L (from large), they have the capacity to launch missiles (sm39 exocet) and operate the heavy blackshark torpedoes. the chileans u209 had a extensive refit in 2008 in ASMAR shipyards in chile with new sonar, cms, etc. that mimic some of the features of the more modern scorpenne class. the ecuatorians u209 1300 was modernized in 2012 also in ASMAR chile, so they have similar capacities than the chileans

@emanuel.--.

6 ай бұрын

van a tener la capacidad de lanzar misiles antibuques

I lost some friends in recent 209 class subsink

@drewblackmatter6669

2 жыл бұрын

⚓😔🙏

Germany has been a pioneer in designing & building submarines, since 1936 . . . really like to learn about the rationale behind most of the world's navies opting for small submarines, such as the Type 209/212 & Scorpène class of light displacement fast attack submarines . . . unlike surface combatants 84% of all submarines currently in service with navies around the world has an average displacement of less than 1,630 tons (submerged/loaded) . . . ofcourse putting aside the world of nuclear powered guided ballistic missile submarines (SSBNs) & naval based nuclear delivery solutions, because only a handful of navies operate SSBNs armed with nukes . . . is it because of the high cost of submarines or lack of capabilities that are not necessary at the moment . . . so why spend millions in incorporating some state-of-the-art naval warfare solution in a simple 1,120 ton (loaded) fast attack submarine . . . a piece of submerged warfare tech that is really not needed in the current situation . . . for e.g. a dedicated six-cell VLS instead of the improvised torpedo tube launched missiles . . .

Ini yg Benar.,

Isn't S.Korean Type 209 subs are most advanced variant?

@goodputin4324

2 жыл бұрын

Yup

Kilo class

Brilliant, Germany 🇩🇪 giving good submarine technology to the world 🌎 👏. Did the British navy sink an Argentina 🇦🇷 submarine Santa Fe in 1982 ?

@goodputin4324

2 жыл бұрын

No it was the Santa Fe that scuttled the RN

@beachboy0505

2 жыл бұрын

@@goodputin4324 explain some unknown history 🤔

14:21 not proved in a real war??? ask the family of the people who died in the Falklands if it was a real war or not!

@KodoSpirit

2 жыл бұрын

none of the submarine torpedos worked....

@zhufortheimpaler4041

2 жыл бұрын

@@KodoSpirit does that matter? they closed to combat ranges with the british expeditionary force and fired 8 torpedos. that they did not work is due to an untrained exchange technician wiring the guidance wires wrong. so, yes, they were proven in real war.

@garethfairclough8715

2 жыл бұрын

@@zhufortheimpaler4041 Err, the only thing proven was that they could get into position.

@zhufortheimpaler4041

2 жыл бұрын

@@garethfairclough8715 yeah and that the UK got lucky, that the argentinians had badly trained weapons technicians. what would have happened if one of the carriers was hit with several torpedoes? or some of the heavier escort units? the battlegroup would have to withdrawl from the conflict, wich would have left the marines on the falklands without air cover or naval support. in that case the war would have been lost for the UK

@Steven-sy7lr

2 жыл бұрын

@@zhufortheimpaler4041 of course that matters they were shite

And Portugal.

Chile has U-209/1400...

Kapal selam buatan Inggris,Amerika,Rusia dan Jerman yang kualitas baik

Actually the german navy, "won" the battle off Jutlant, in ww1. By the numbers, and tonnage sank.

@ach3909

2 жыл бұрын

By that logic, Germany during WWII won the eastern front because more Russians died. Yeah just making the enemy lose more stuff/lives than you doesn't mean a victory.

@jpmtlhead39

2 жыл бұрын

@@ach3909 i wasnt talking abaut ww2. It was a comentary, abaut, a battle in ww1,in a channel dedicated to ships.

@ach3909

2 жыл бұрын

@@jpmtlhead39 The fact that you aren't talking about WWII is irrelevant. I was simply putting under the spotlight the logic behind calling the battle in question a victory simply by basing it out of the numbers of men and equipment lost. Hence why I opened with "by that logic" and my subsequent comparison to the Eastern Front of the following war. And a channel dedicated to ships? This isn't Drachnifel last I checked.

@jpmtlhead39

2 жыл бұрын

@@ach3909 thats not logic, its a fact.

@Steven-sy7lr

2 жыл бұрын

@@ach3909 these channels are full of Russian and Chinese trolls when you come across one i wouldn't bother normally there names give it away

You forgot to mention about Turkish variants in detail like Greece, Brazil, india and Venezuela.

@juliusraben3526

2 жыл бұрын

He mentioned in the beginning, that there are 5 subclasses.

@juliusraben3526

2 жыл бұрын

@@Nihalshaikh03 "detail" :P

@juliusraben3526

2 жыл бұрын

@@Nihalshaikh03 sure... but a wiki page can tell you more haha

It's a good design but poorer nations carry on using it past 21 years ,two fatalities in the past 5 years these navies were still using them even though they were over 30 years old while in service.

@Giyora52

5 ай бұрын

Indeed it is a poor design

Many whales died in the Falklands while the RN was trying to get the ARA San Luis... RIP, gentle giants

@Steven-sy7lr

2 жыл бұрын

We could always get it now if its not in dock just face it the people who live on the falklands dont want to be part of a strange 3rd world country.

@martindione386

2 жыл бұрын

@@Steven-sy7lr they ARE a strange 3rd world "country"

@Steven-sy7lr

2 жыл бұрын

@@martindione386 no idea what you mean you'll have to be clearer. But yea they are a strange 3rd world country that we agree on.

Check the data…a lot of mistakes with south american submarines…Argentina, Chile and Peru

bad video old submarine Dolphin 2 class mush better and change for IDF with own system - 209 old and cheap

@bjoernschneider7762

2 жыл бұрын

Bad comment max k dumb and silly

@Exodon2020

2 жыл бұрын

Makes sense, considering the Dolphin class is pretty much a 209 augmented with improvements the Germans made for their very own Type 212A which is not rated for export.