You know how crucial these lectures are when you are studying night before the exam, they are lifesavers Can't thank her in words

@celestialextremity

2 жыл бұрын

For real, not about to fail my Intro to logic final tomorrow 💪💪

@shawndigeronimo1884

2 жыл бұрын

Me right now

I have been trying so so hard to grasp this concept and it wasn't until I watched this video that it all started making sense! THANK YOU!

Crucial to understand how to prove validity. I had the idea to add another if then statement at the very end to test it, and this video was exactly the confirmation I needed. Thanks a bunch!

Oh wow! Your tutorial made it SOOOOO much easier to understand. I kept stopping at the H1 & H2 & H3, blah blah blah, but did not realize I need to do the implication to the conclusion step. Thank you for making this tutorial.

I remember when I used de Morgan's law to prove de Morgan's law....

@The_attacker99

2 жыл бұрын

Mannnnnnn

Thank you so much for this video. That was exactly the explanation that I was seeking for. Kudos!

Nice Way To Teach Such A tough Subject. Love From Pakistan 🇵🇰

Oh my gosh I spent so much time trying to the other way and were not able to find True statement base! This make way easier to understand than "Using Rules of Inference to Build Arguments" Thank you for your time.

You help me a lot!! Thanks! I was struggling with the open book exam and your video saved me!

THANK YOU for making this so much easier to understand. I wanted to give up yesterday and now that im refreshed i came across your videos and you teach better !

Finally, I have an understanding! Thank you!

thank you so much for this, my uni prof literally did not explain any of this to us so this was a lifesaver

Thank you so much for this well explained video! I have an exam today, you really helped me.

👌Thank you so much dear for clear concept .God bless you .Be Happy

You have really helped me today thank you and God bless you!

Oh my god, this was EXACTLY what I was looking for. Thanks a ton

this was the explanation I was searching for, you saved me thank u so much !!

I will have my exam in the next week (1 July 2024), and your explanation regarding this truth table, help me a lot to understand about this topic. I failed miserably in previous semester math exam, i hope i can pass in this semester. Thank you so much for the video. God bless you 😇

extraordinary explanation. Thank u soo much....

Thank you, I have a philosophy exam tomorrow that I am really dreading. This definitely helped.

thank you so much, my philosophy teacher did something way different than this! this is much longer but much more informative, for example, instead of pqr, he would label it as c (coffee), d (drink) t (cream), and he would ask us to immediately right them down vertically then horizontally like this [(c->d)^(t->d)^(c^t)] -> d, then we would label the truth table underneath it

@shayanngail5152

7 жыл бұрын

islayall69 are you from philippines?

@puffpanda1

7 жыл бұрын

islayall69 my prof taught it to us the same way and it made the lecture more confusing than it had to be. Found this video more helpful than my professor

@SineEyed

5 жыл бұрын

But you left out the donut..

THANK YOU SO MUCH 😊 you are the one who saved me 🥺🥺

what if i have an if and statement in my conclusion? Would it be my "premises and (for example) PvQ--->r)? how could I solve that? Should I create a whole new column for PvQ---r?

Thanks!, now i can do my logic homework, Thank you very much!!

This saved my semester. Thank you so much

Thank you so much. I finally understand.

Thank you so much befor i watch this i dont know anything but now its more clearly to me tnx

gosh darn it maam you are life saver!

this video will save my grade istg thank you

You explained it so well..this helped me a lot...Thank you so much mam! ❤❤

and this is why I failed discrete math.

@itsMaTt123

7 жыл бұрын

i think this is used for logic. but im failing logic so iidk

@jordihc

6 жыл бұрын

Got my exam in two days! Think i got this tho.

@Sonsho

6 жыл бұрын

Well? How was it? Got mine in 2 hours

@zReanimation

5 жыл бұрын

@@Sonsho well how was it? got mine tomorrow

@Sonsho

5 жыл бұрын

@@zReanimation Wow this thread brought back some memories, I passed it with a 4/5

7 years ago video... Superb ❤

Ma'am can you please do exercises on lattices in discrete mathematics?... I'm very much confused of those problems..

I found this really useful. Framing the argument into letters makes it more simple to understand and see the reasoning behind the conclusion.

Thank you very much for this video.

Thank you for making this. explained it better than my teachers LOL

thank you so much for saving my Logic exam tomorrow 🙌

this is so nice, well explained

Oh my god, THANK YOU.

how come if the antecedent is false it doesn't matter what the conclusion is? I thought that F -> T is F, for the last column...?

@MaalWorksHard

5 ай бұрын

IM TRYING TO FIGURE THAT OUT MYSELF ;(((( AND NOBODY IS ASKING THIS QUESTION

is the conjunction "and" not supposed to be represented with a dot tho? @1:40

Seriously you are the best ♥️

Thanks for the last night exam preperation

after all the stupid slides i wasted time on i understood the topic now. Thanks❤

Thank you for the video

THANK YOU SO MUCH THIS HELPED ME!!

Thanks It helped me for my exams

great video! I think you made an error when calculating the premises (notp ^ r), the second last F should be T. Did anyone else catch/think this?

I hate hate hate these but you helped me so much. My brain can grasp many things, but Quantitative reasoning unfortunately isn't one of those things.

A landlady has a room to let. Two conditions: tenants should not drink and should not smoke. Two students came. A came and said: If I drink then I smoke, but I do not drink. B came and said: If I drink then I smoke, but I do not smoke. Who is the one to get this room? please can i get thr answer

nice explanations

Awesome video thanks.

thank you so much.. finally i got it!

Character In the video It's great, I like it a lot $$

Great you are the best

SUch a great video, Thanks.

having a donut and coffee is not binary though, probabilistic in my life

How should I solve this one? ~p^(qv~r)

Please does that mean if I get just a false in the last column it makes the argument invalid ?

@geetagupta5300

7 жыл бұрын

Zarbrick Osei yes

Thank you ma'am!

Thank you so much

How do we write them in symbols maam?

thank you so much this will be so useful *in discord*

is it necessary that all the values needs to be true ?

I'm failing my course ughhhhh help!!!!

Thank you very much

hi, how can i get in touch with you?

Thank you!

Thank you!!

This time got that topic. Thank you for making it so simple. Can I please get your mailing address for other queries?

how do you know that "if false then true is your only false statement?""????????

@x_isaka

7 жыл бұрын

Marcil Orahim Coz in implies (-->) where premises is p and q is 'q' so she did premises ---> q where if premises is false its automatically true since it is not True >>False =False.

@MoosaIslamic

5 жыл бұрын

Look. Basically, if I say: 'If I go to the gym (p), I'm going hard (q)' Then, if I don't go to the gym, the statement still holds. The ONLY case where the statement is false is if I go to the gym, but DON'T go hard.

Great explanation👍

Had to do this with my computer science degree. It's made me do this mentally with my arguments and even though I may seem like a no-it-all at times at least I know not to say dumb shit!

@connoroflynn1750

7 жыл бұрын

cale shoemaker know-it-all* ironic I know

@chancho1010

7 жыл бұрын

Haha! I must change my name!

@keeganli1692

6 жыл бұрын

What! computer science degree!? Im 13 and I need to do this!

Thank You :)

I still don’t get it

plz can you give me an example and explain why is it true when 'p' is false and 'q' is true

@bbqboi182

7 жыл бұрын

it just does

@NR-lc8we

6 жыл бұрын

Because if the antecedent

@nathanx.675

5 жыл бұрын

Because if the premise is false, it doesn't matter what the statement says. For example, If I say, all unicorns are green, it's automatically always true because unicorn doesn't exist. So we never know it's color and therefore it could be whatever color you say it is

@0cards0

5 жыл бұрын

@@nathanx.675 nevermind, got it :)

I'm still confused.. I don't understand the truth table at all. I understand from the beginning why it's valid, but I don't understand how to compute the truth table.

thank you so much

Thank you so much

Mam plz tell how u hv no. True & false to p q r in starting... I m facing much problem in these

Thank you Madam

These is a logical contradiction

THIS IS AWESOME. THANK YOU SIS! I feel honoured to have a lecture this good from a black queen. Im from Turkey and white tho. Just respect.

wow i understand it now

Thank you

Thank you☺️

I still have no idea how to do this stuff lol, f its too confusing.

thank you soo much

Thank u so muuch. My exam is tomorrow

Good experience ☺️

how is... if false , false end up being true??

Isn't there a method by which we can solve this without using truth tables mathematically?

Hey, is a syllogism two premises and a conclusion? If so, then can an argument with three or more premises still be a syllogism? Also, I know sentential logic but what is it called when it is in English? What do you call that? Before you translate?

@malteeaser101

8 жыл бұрын

+Controversy Owl Also, how would you translate this argument? *(I) All tigers are mammals* *(II) Tony is a tiger* *_____________* *Therefore, Tony is a mammal* I've translated and checked on the truth table. It says it is invalid? How the heck is that invalid?

@RosesAndIvy

7 жыл бұрын

I realise this comment is from a year ago, but I can still answer your question. Your argument cannot be translated into propositional logic (which the video is about), it has to be translated into predicate logic. Then you get: (I) For all x: T(x) --> M(x) (II) T(t) -------------- M(t) "For all" is called the universal quantifier, and is usually written as an upside down A, but of course I can't type that in the youtube comments. Predicate logic also has the existential quantifier, which is written as a backwards E, and means "there is at least one". Unfortunately you can't draw truth tables for predicate logic, it is undecidable.

@tascisiousmunkombwe5210

6 жыл бұрын

Thank u

thank you

THANK YOUUU

Thanks soooooooooooooooooooo much

so easy thanks

thank u ma'am

Thankyou ✌️🏻💓

Thnk u so much