Full match: kzread.info3OnvTlayfiI 🌎 2024 Las Vegas 10-Ball Open by Rums of Puerto Rico 📍 Rio All Suites Hotel and Casino, Las Vegas (USA)
Жүктеу.....
Пікірлер: 52
@freedomforthebrave29 күн бұрын
That was a good safety battle
@joebermuda645211 күн бұрын
He did hit the 5 ball but it was a foul because no ball touched a rail after contact
@user-mk5tl6ft9y29 күн бұрын
Ouschan is the closest player ever to Efren Reyes in terms of the execution on escaping snooker. His angles are precise and he never hit and hope.
@cry_now_laugh_later
23 күн бұрын
🤔ehh
@arnoudjanschut28 күн бұрын
The ref shure knows his game, but how can there be no rail after contact if the cue ball is touching the rail? Maybe it was not touching but how come it runs along the rail a bit then?
@cry_now_laugh_later
23 күн бұрын
Because it was a bad call by the ref
@kauryellecook150829 күн бұрын
Predator coming w their own short form content 😎 fair play lads
@erod448926 күн бұрын
Man these guys were still on point, although missing a run pattern, they opted for safeties which are in deed challenging. Aaaand they nailed em.
@NombreFrancisco28 күн бұрын
The Referee (if that's what their Title is), looks like Jeff Ross.
@wayniak276615 күн бұрын
It was a bad call. Either the cue ball hill the object ball and ran into rail, on cue ball bounced away from rail before making contact and then redirected back into the rail with almost a full rotation of the cue ball. Physics doesn't lie
@EuphGabeАй бұрын
That cue ball did made contact with the rail after the 5-ball. Nevertheless, it was a tough one to judge.
@davidparker8475
Ай бұрын
Close but it was a bad hit.
@poolhub89
29 күн бұрын
@@davidparker8475 Agreed, correct call.
@Quatsch83
29 күн бұрын
Sure looked like it got a rail. If the CB was frozen to the rail when the ref grabbed it then it was a good hit. Can’t say from the footage though Edited to fix autocorrect error of “radio” to “rail”
@RichardsWorld
29 күн бұрын
It looked like it hit the ball and rail at the same time. The cue ball stayed on the rail and never bounced off. I'm guessing the rule would be something has to it a rail after contact.
@bawcesauce8071
29 күн бұрын
The cue ball did not hit the 5 as it was approaching the rail and since the cue ball was frozen to the rail upon hitting the 5 afterward, the discretion goes to the judge to make the call. So he ruled no contact after the hit, which was the correct call.
@21RIP25 күн бұрын
Science says the ref f’d the call.
@cry_now_laugh_later
23 күн бұрын
Yup, I’m surprised Albin didn’t contest that one
@user-cg9xv9cx4b27 күн бұрын
8:07 Can anyone told me Why Is Foul?
@benvivitron
27 күн бұрын
An object ball must be potted or a rail must be hit after the target ball is struck. In this case, no ball hit the rail after the orange 5 was struck. However, it's very close. You could argue the cue ball hit the rail after the 5, but live in person would be hard to see.
@DIYChannelSteve29 күн бұрын
no foul at kzread.info/dash/bejne/fIaEvMGresmrpc4.html .
@DaScheissIchDrauf
29 күн бұрын
btw you just can write the time stamp like 7:44 and it automatically becomes clickable
@Agiyi
29 күн бұрын
difficult to say, but i think that you're right. I guess the rational was that it hit the rail and the 5 at the same time and then didn't hit a rail... But i do think it was rail-5-rail...
@Quatsch83
28 күн бұрын
@@Agiyi I think it hit the rail before the 5 but then came back towards the rail because of the roll it had after. Can’t really tell if it made it all the way back to the rail but sure looks like it is frozen at the end
@Agiyi
28 күн бұрын
@@Quatsch83 yes, that's the problem, that it looks frozen at the end. Theoretically speaking, it the cb hit the rail and the 5 at the same time, and then remained frozen, it is a foul...
@KK-sg5gl
21 күн бұрын
@@Agiyiit’s physically impossible to hit the rail and ball at the same time and remain frozen. Human eyes might not be able to see it happen, but basic physics won’t allow that to happen. There will always be a microscopic bounce between the two objects.
@tonyjeymes978623 күн бұрын
Van b looks like et 😮
@erod448926 күн бұрын
Both your wrists will get offly tired
@Oakleydriver112723 күн бұрын
Commentary was embarrassing to listen to. If you’re gonna bring up the size of the pockets it makes you both sound dumb when neither of you know the size.
@steveb9525Ай бұрын
I can beat these guys
@pete1735
29 күн бұрын
Never seen you playing 😅
@billyjim1116
29 күн бұрын
beat em then
@cry_now_laugh_later
29 күн бұрын
Fortnite doesn’t count
@susy0360
29 күн бұрын
Who gives a 💩!
@pessimisticpuma
29 күн бұрын
You’d beat them off. You look like you’re quite a shaft stroker, bud.
Пікірлер: 52
That was a good safety battle
He did hit the 5 ball but it was a foul because no ball touched a rail after contact
Ouschan is the closest player ever to Efren Reyes in terms of the execution on escaping snooker. His angles are precise and he never hit and hope.
@cry_now_laugh_later
23 күн бұрын
🤔ehh
The ref shure knows his game, but how can there be no rail after contact if the cue ball is touching the rail? Maybe it was not touching but how come it runs along the rail a bit then?
@cry_now_laugh_later
23 күн бұрын
Because it was a bad call by the ref
Predator coming w their own short form content 😎 fair play lads
Man these guys were still on point, although missing a run pattern, they opted for safeties which are in deed challenging. Aaaand they nailed em.
The Referee (if that's what their Title is), looks like Jeff Ross.
It was a bad call. Either the cue ball hill the object ball and ran into rail, on cue ball bounced away from rail before making contact and then redirected back into the rail with almost a full rotation of the cue ball. Physics doesn't lie
That cue ball did made contact with the rail after the 5-ball. Nevertheless, it was a tough one to judge.
@davidparker8475
Ай бұрын
Close but it was a bad hit.
@poolhub89
29 күн бұрын
@@davidparker8475 Agreed, correct call.
@Quatsch83
29 күн бұрын
Sure looked like it got a rail. If the CB was frozen to the rail when the ref grabbed it then it was a good hit. Can’t say from the footage though Edited to fix autocorrect error of “radio” to “rail”
@RichardsWorld
29 күн бұрын
It looked like it hit the ball and rail at the same time. The cue ball stayed on the rail and never bounced off. I'm guessing the rule would be something has to it a rail after contact.
@bawcesauce8071
29 күн бұрын
The cue ball did not hit the 5 as it was approaching the rail and since the cue ball was frozen to the rail upon hitting the 5 afterward, the discretion goes to the judge to make the call. So he ruled no contact after the hit, which was the correct call.
Science says the ref f’d the call.
@cry_now_laugh_later
23 күн бұрын
Yup, I’m surprised Albin didn’t contest that one
8:07 Can anyone told me Why Is Foul?
@benvivitron
27 күн бұрын
An object ball must be potted or a rail must be hit after the target ball is struck. In this case, no ball hit the rail after the orange 5 was struck. However, it's very close. You could argue the cue ball hit the rail after the 5, but live in person would be hard to see.
no foul at kzread.info/dash/bejne/fIaEvMGresmrpc4.html .
@DaScheissIchDrauf
29 күн бұрын
btw you just can write the time stamp like 7:44 and it automatically becomes clickable
@Agiyi
29 күн бұрын
difficult to say, but i think that you're right. I guess the rational was that it hit the rail and the 5 at the same time and then didn't hit a rail... But i do think it was rail-5-rail...
@Quatsch83
28 күн бұрын
@@Agiyi I think it hit the rail before the 5 but then came back towards the rail because of the roll it had after. Can’t really tell if it made it all the way back to the rail but sure looks like it is frozen at the end
@Agiyi
28 күн бұрын
@@Quatsch83 yes, that's the problem, that it looks frozen at the end. Theoretically speaking, it the cb hit the rail and the 5 at the same time, and then remained frozen, it is a foul...
@KK-sg5gl
21 күн бұрын
@@Agiyiit’s physically impossible to hit the rail and ball at the same time and remain frozen. Human eyes might not be able to see it happen, but basic physics won’t allow that to happen. There will always be a microscopic bounce between the two objects.
Van b looks like et 😮
Both your wrists will get offly tired
Commentary was embarrassing to listen to. If you’re gonna bring up the size of the pockets it makes you both sound dumb when neither of you know the size.
I can beat these guys
@pete1735
29 күн бұрын
Never seen you playing 😅
@billyjim1116
29 күн бұрын
beat em then
@cry_now_laugh_later
29 күн бұрын
Fortnite doesn’t count
@susy0360
29 күн бұрын
Who gives a 💩!
@pessimisticpuma
29 күн бұрын
You’d beat them off. You look like you’re quite a shaft stroker, bud.