The thing that drives me nuts is in movies when the characters are taking a long haul flight and it shows like a regional plane or a 737. It always makes me roll my eyes lol

@HS-DBQ

10 ай бұрын

There are long haul 737 flights..

@Snowy-oq4ur

10 ай бұрын

@@HS-DBQaren’t very common though. There isn’t much long-haul routes that a 737 can serve anyway

@HS-DBQ

10 ай бұрын

@@Snowy-oq4ur HS-DBQ aren’t very common. I know that.

@therealrus727

10 ай бұрын

yes me too

@JoeDFWAviation

10 ай бұрын

A TV show, “Arthur” has an episode about adoption from China. It shows Binky’s family flying to China on a 727, overnight. 👎🏻 Another episode features some live action and somehow their A320 in live action turns into a 727 in cartoon.

"You can always go around"

@supnnn9239

4 жыл бұрын

*swiss001 reference*

@miladicanimations7759

4 жыл бұрын

"If it don't look right coming down"

@fo_flipbyte

4 жыл бұрын

"Don't wait until you're sideways, maybe sliding on the ground"

@acidi

4 жыл бұрын

you can alwaysssssssss go around.

@sukhoi3572

4 жыл бұрын

@@supnnn9239 no.... he didnt invent that song funnily it has always been on yt

“This movie isn’t an aviation movie, it’s a movie where the main character works as an ATC” Say that again but slowly...

@aehrr4247

4 жыл бұрын

LOL

@zoebells767

4 жыл бұрын

Jorge Abreu LMAO I THOUGHT THE SAME THING

@Aviation18

4 жыл бұрын

Jorge Abreu lol that does sound odd but it’s not, just like if a movie has someone working for KFC, it’s not a movie about food you get me?

@commonavionics6069

4 жыл бұрын

That is an easy way to get to federal prison.

@ThePrimeMinisterOfTheBlock

4 жыл бұрын

@@Aviation18 well KFC ain't food so

Former USAF here: in the Olympus Has Fallen Scene you're correct in saying that the AC-130 would have been intercepted long before reaching the city, including all of the circumstances surrounding it like the implausibility of the theft happening secretly. I can add a few more items of my own: -While using F-22's to protect D.C. works, since a major squadron of them is based to the south in Virginia, the nearest AC-130 base is all the way in Florida. They would have to fly a very, very long distance to get that plane to D.C., plenty of time to get caught. -The F-22's would not intercept any airplane with a "side-by-side" approach like that. It's an incredibly stupid tactic that leaves too many openings. Instead, fighters intercept by having one airplane fly close to the left and slightly ahead with the wingman hanging back behind the target with a finger on the trigger. -The AC-130's guns are portrayed completely wrong in the air-to-air sequence. They do not have guns on both sides of the airplane. There are a total of three weapons mounted on one side of the plane, as it is designed to "orbit" around a target with those weapons focused on a ground target. Modern gunships typically have only one rotary gun (and some don't even have that), with the other guns being heavy cannons like howitzers. It's also absurd to think they could hit a target in the air, as their range of motion only allows them to focus on a target on the ground, so they don't move that much. The F-22's in the scene needed to be perfectly lined up with these non-existent gun ports in order to get hit. Overall, just a very implausible scene for anyone who knows these aircraft. I literally laughed when all of that was going on because the setup is just so ridiculous and requires not only people being completely blind and stupid to work, but also uses a configuration that has never existed. Great video, thanks for sharing it all!

@Matt-mv5tt

4 жыл бұрын

Cyborg Spaceman I’ll also add that the C-130, from what I understand, has a separate crew to manage the weapons. There aren’t any switches and buttons in the cockpit for the pilots to operate the weapons

@allangibson8494

4 жыл бұрын

The assumption is that the aircraft was American - C-130's are not exactly rare anywhere, if you looked hard enough I am sure the Russians have a couple. And then there are the civilian variants. Two days in a paint shop and you can make a C-130 any colour you want. The real difficulty would actually be inserting a military flight plan into the system to Andrews Airforce Base for an inbound C-130 from somewhere outside radar and communications coverage. Modified C-130 is then inserted to the planned slot out of coverage - much more difficult now with satellite communications.

@masonmtb7

4 жыл бұрын

Allan Gibson actually in a shot of the -130, you can see it says USAF on it. So it is an american -130

@sidv4615

2 жыл бұрын

Were you a pilot?

@CNWPlayer

2 жыл бұрын

The F-22s could've also ejected, right?

The AC-130 cockpit was a 727 cockpit The cockpit the A330 is also incorrect.

@dequaviousdinglenuts

4 жыл бұрын

Jesse Karhiaho i was thinking exactly the same thing.

@dancoleman8234

4 жыл бұрын

Surprised that didn’t get a mention....

@nalin3640

4 жыл бұрын

I saw the V shape on the AC-130

@thatflywelshguy9662

4 жыл бұрын

727 actually. Still has the panel behind the FO

@jimbobmemer4080

4 жыл бұрын

true

8:20 you forgot the stellar a330 turns into a 777x with a330 winglets

@aviation22

4 жыл бұрын

yeah lol

@Danalog_video

4 жыл бұрын

I agree

@G__Brtz

4 жыл бұрын

And from the inside you can see that the cockpit window became of a 737

@corgidoodle

4 жыл бұрын

i agree too

@nalin3640

4 жыл бұрын

Yeah ur right but why magic a330 turns into 77x with a339 winglets

There are a couple more things in the "2:22" movie. 1. When the cockpit of the Stellar Airlines flight is shown, you can see the positions of the pilots are switched (The captain is sitting on the right and the F/O is sitting on the left). 2. When the Stellar Airlines is shown from the back after it touches down, you can clearly see that the "A330" is actually a 777-200 with photoshopped wingtips.

@dylbanan140

10 ай бұрын

what movie

@Frydee123

10 ай бұрын

2:22. That's the title

@dylbanan140

10 ай бұрын

@@Frydee123 i thought you mean jurassic world because the timestamp is perfectly then when jurassic world is a topic im a big fan of the JP/JW series and i couldn't remember anything you just said 😅 now its clear

@Frydee123

10 ай бұрын

@@dylbanan140 oh haha 😅

@AvgeekRPLL

9 ай бұрын

Do you also noticed both aircraft showed airbus planes yet the cockpit showed boeing

Tom Hanks did an interview about "Sully". He said when he meets a character he's going to play ,he tells them " I'll be saying and doing things you didn't do". Pretty much what happens in aviation movies. Hanks said he tries to get a sense of the character at least. Thanks for the video.

@Aviation18

4 жыл бұрын

Oh wow that's really interesting to know, Thanks

3:03 American still kept a couple of their aircraft in the old livery like the 737,757 and I think a 767.

@ryanr2371

4 жыл бұрын

Jayden cooper I have a picture of a American 737 in the old livery I took it in 2017

@GE90man

4 жыл бұрын

They only kept one 737 in th old livery

@zduckhunter

4 жыл бұрын

Jurassic World came out in 2015. American still had a few 757-200s in this livery due to there impeading retirement. That is not a mistake.

@aydensaviation9249

4 жыл бұрын

They have 1 737 and a bunch of erj 140's in the silver livery

@hannoizitty

4 жыл бұрын

AA had 767s in the old livery, back in 2016. The 757 is correct. I am more worried about the last scene, where the close-ups show 737-style window frames, when the ACFT is supposed to be a 330. Furthermore, I am not quite sure...but I think to have read somewhere, that Home Alone was shot at ORD's T1 - while AA operates out of T3. There is a similiar-looking hallway, leading towards concourses H & K, though.

More with Home Alone: 1. At the time the movie was released, no airline out of ORD had a morning departure to Europe. AA didn't start its morning flight to LHR until after 2000. 2. At the time of the movie, AA flew either 767-200ER or 767-300ER, depending on the season. A friend of mine, who has been an AA pilot since 1989 has been ORD crew base since 1990 and knew some pilots who were flying ORD-ORY, when the movie was released. 3. The DC-10 in the movie is the domestic -10 series and lacks trans-Atlantic range. The international -30 series has the center main gear. At the time, the -30 only flew out of ORD to Honolulu.

@Snowy-oq4ur

10 ай бұрын

Bro knows his stuff 🗿

@TonyTheGato

10 ай бұрын

Still here in 2023 :)@@Snowy-oq4ur

@kfl16

10 ай бұрын

Also, it says they landed at Paris orly airport, where almost no international airline lands except for the ones in Europe for short flights like Ryanair, Iberia, transavia and stuff, all international flights especially the ones from USA land at Charles de Gaulle

@kfl16

9 ай бұрын

@rokiesensei I live in Paris I’m French don’t worry I almost never depart from that terminal as most Air France planes are parked in terminal 2 😂😂

@moharikram1687

9 ай бұрын

​@rokiesensei It's easy. Just avoid Star Alliance airlines to CDG. If you're an American, avoid United when going to CDG.

The AC 130, and all the gunships, only fire to the left. So the first clip is hilarious...

The bigger "error" and peeve I have about that scene in "Olympus Has Fallen" is that they show the flight crew operating the mini-guns. The AC130 carries multiple other crew in the back who fire the guns, not the pilots. The idea that a crew of two can fly, target, and fire multiple independent guns all at the same time is worse than even assuming they could steal a USAF C130, fly into DC airspace, and not be noticed or challenged before they get there.

@dx1450

7 ай бұрын

And the AC-130 only has guns on the port side, not both sides. The aircraft operates by orbiting its target in a left turn in a manner to keep the rotary cannons and the big howitzer cannon on target.

Home alone 2, they let Kevin board the aircraft without checking his ticket.

@PortlandAviation

4 жыл бұрын

That sort of thing could happen at the time that Home Alone 2 was made. My grandparents got on the wrong flight on one occasion. It's fairly plausible.

@Aviation18

4 жыл бұрын

@@PortlandAviation Yeh Pre 9/11 was a completely style of flying

@simsandsurgery1

4 жыл бұрын

Pre 9/11

@crispesongco9822

4 жыл бұрын

Pre 9/11

@tomney4460

4 жыл бұрын

AviationInVegas Well, this was 1991

5:56, in this scene you can see it's a A330 because of how the APU Exhaust looks like. Then at 6:31, it turns into a 777-200 or -300 with A330 Winglets. *Clap Clap Clap*

@sidestickmar

4 жыл бұрын

I actually thought he would mention that but he didn't so BRUH

@aviation3.027

4 жыл бұрын

Ur right

@nitincharles6773

4 жыл бұрын

CGI animation at its best

@OfficialPullUpGear

4 жыл бұрын

Is it just me or is the ATC tower in 6:33 Sydney’s not JFK?

@Gamer-lz6zz

4 жыл бұрын

Bruh

The American Airlines 757 bare metal paint scheme is believable for the time. The airline has and continues to maintain what are known as legacy aircraft, with liveries from previous eras and airlines that have been absorbed over time. Though the current bare aluminum scheme is borne most recently by a 737NG.

@fosterfuchs

8 ай бұрын

If memory serves correctly, AA took more than 2 years to repaint all their aircraft. And some were not repainted at all. The MD 80's, for example, were left in their original livery because AA was going to phase them out, anyway.

@boatlover1875

8 ай бұрын

Correct. @@fosterfuchs

6:33 Bruh This one word actually describes the entire video.

6:28 - So were not even going to acknowledge the fact that the amount of wake turbulence / wind produced by the two aircraft would have made them both super unstable!

@rayanaltowayan9558

4 жыл бұрын

wind ? seriously ?

@ruhaan6216

4 жыл бұрын

no we're not because its not called WIND

@My_AviationChannel

4 жыл бұрын

ProGamerRD7 Gaming Correct me then

@My_AviationChannel

4 жыл бұрын

Rayan Altowayan Correct me then

@rayanaltowayan9558

4 жыл бұрын

@@My_AviationChannel wake turbulence dude

8:13 they put winglets on a 777-200

@airplanewhat5316

4 жыл бұрын

You can see at 5:55 that is an A330, so the winglets are ok, but then, as you said, at 8:13, you still a plane with winglets but now on a 777

@JayJayAviation

4 жыл бұрын

Exactly

@JayJayAviation

4 жыл бұрын

Also they put an A320 RB211 on an A330 lol

@airplanewhat5316

4 жыл бұрын

@@JayJayAviation ahah lol

@alexs3187

4 жыл бұрын

You can add winglets to a plane. Many 727s and 757s have been retrofitted.

Also Sully, the engine changes from CFM to IAE and back and forth between every shot 08:15 looks like the Sydney tower in background

@WenBaoLightIndustryLTD.

8 ай бұрын

lol I saw it

@WenBaoLightIndustryLTD.

8 ай бұрын

Sydney tower appeared in JFK, non sense

The no.3 happens all the time, boarding one type of aircraft and landing in a completely different one.

@joshuam20

4 жыл бұрын

Michael Bergmark What you don’t know is half way through they actually flew to planes next to each other and reboarded midair much like the refuelling of a plane.

@bostonrailfan2427

8 ай бұрын

@@joshuam20you mean they using a literal skybridge to connect midair? 🤣😎

@bostonrailfan2427

8 ай бұрын

the unfortunate part of stock footage is things like that…and the whole Sully equipment timeframe issues as well

@linkfreeman1998

8 ай бұрын

@@bostonrailfan2427 Yeah, almost sort of like the passengers transfer scene in the movie Speed 😂

5:59 Emirates in the back ground

@torpedozi1173

4 жыл бұрын

I also saw Emirates airbus a380 and i think it is All Nippon Airways or air china I'm unsure and i think it is boeing 787.

@frenchchicken2799

4 жыл бұрын

@@moosetheantlered94 The Qantas jets are Stellar Air jets but ye

@TurtleRailTSR

4 жыл бұрын

MasterNite It might possibly be a China Southern 777-31BER as they fly that on the CAN=JFK route

@geo_324

4 жыл бұрын

6:08 Transaero and two Delta jets

@geo_324

4 жыл бұрын

@@frenchchicken2799 there are Qantas jets in 6:00

2:12 The biggest blunder for me is that the inside footage is clearly a 737NG and the pilots are using the trim switch to shoot there mini guns...

@capt.heinrich6945

4 жыл бұрын

yes

@kaimurtagh

4 жыл бұрын

Actually, it's not an NG.

@yummy9731

4 жыл бұрын

Lol

@paddymcc7460

4 жыл бұрын

Kai Murtagh hi kai

@kaimurtagh

4 жыл бұрын

@@paddymcc7460 oh hi there😂

“Punch it” :D How much more “punch it” can you get when the engines are already at take off thrust?

@maxvandenberg955

4 жыл бұрын

Peizxcv T/O thrust does not perse equal maximum thrust.

@germeister6917

4 жыл бұрын

I view "Punch it" as a quote from Han Solo! 😉👍

@welcome3513

4 жыл бұрын

Peizxcv I’m not sure about Boeing because I do most of my research on the airbus side of things but airbus has a throttle “setting” known as flex so that way you don’t use all the engine but if needed you can exceed to full thrust. I’m not sure if this translates well

@Peizxcv

4 жыл бұрын

Welcome Make sense

@capnskiddies

4 жыл бұрын

@@germeister6917 The Getaway, Steve McQueen. "punch it, baby"

I always noticed this one mistake that drove me crazy.. In Melissa McCarthy's SPY, there are two short establishing shots of airports that are supposed to show the audience that the character has travelled. First they claim to land in Paris, but it's a shot of a Blue1 717, and the airport kinda looks like Helsinki - then they claim to land in Rome, but it's clearly a shot of a LAN A320 landing in Santiago de Chile...

@BeckerAviation

9 ай бұрын

I was gonna mention Spy (2015), since it absolutely drove me nuts. The LAN A320 shot was recorded not only at my home airport but in a spotting point I often visit. It's hilarious

@kentfrederick8929

8 ай бұрын

In Airport 75, the 747 in question is flying a "redeye" from Dulles to LAX. Problem 1 is that redeyes are eastbound flights, say leaving the Wrst Coast between 11pm and 1 am for an arrival at 5am and 7am. A flight leaving Dulles at 10pm ET would arrive at LAX at 1am PT. Problem 2 is Salt Lake as the alternate for LAX. SLC could be an alternate for SFO, although that is still some distance. An LAX alternate would more likely be Phoenix or Las Vegas.

6:13 You missed the thrust settings... The plane is taking off on idle thrust?... and when told it sets to 50%?

@yummy9731

4 жыл бұрын

Haha lol i noticed

@DomoniqueMusiclover

4 жыл бұрын

I didn't even see that. There were just so many errors in the clip ..haha

@Matt-mv5tt

4 жыл бұрын

I missed that cuz I was already cringing too hard

@Pringy

4 жыл бұрын

The whole scene made me cringe that much I feel sick 😂

@aarondynamics1311

3 жыл бұрын

and how the A330 landing turned into a 777 with canted winglets

In the film “left behind” they show you close ups from outside of the cockpit but first it is a b747 cockpit and a bit later it’s a A320 cockpit and in the and they crash with a b737...

The tower in "2:22" is Kennedy Tower. However, at timestamp 8:15, the plane gets magically teleported to the Land Down Under because (I believe that is) Sydney Tower (SYD/YSSY) on the left side with its iconic outdoor staircase, bump-outs, and top floor.

@barra333

7 ай бұрын

Good spot. Looks like a landing on 16R seen from the international terminal.

Also, for the airtraffic control one at 8:28, the plane with the red tail magically changes from an a-330 to a 777 - a-330 hybrid thingy that doesn't exist...

@CaptainM792

10 ай бұрын

Neither do those two airlines exist. So let just say it’s a type of aircraft which is indigenous to that particular universe.

@Pilot_Jeff

10 ай бұрын

@@CaptainM792well generally movies about near crash scenes like this do not have real airlines in them i think you could see how that’s problematic

8:20 A330 turnes into a 777. And New York JFK turns into Sydney SYD.

@marcogentile3392

4 жыл бұрын

You mean an airbus 777 because if you watch the wings they still have the a330 winglets

@Tobu9105F

3 жыл бұрын

Uh

@ronandelaney2533

2 жыл бұрын

Yep! ATC Tower is SYD Iconic Tower at 8:15

@CNWPlayer

2 жыл бұрын

No, A330 stays A330

6:31 Shows plane landing runway 16R at Sydney kingsford smith airport, not at JFK.

@MrThedwp

4 жыл бұрын

Considering this movie was made in Australia and nearly the entire cast is Australian then it makes sense they would have used that footage but well spotted

@DomoniqueMusiclover

4 жыл бұрын

Haha

@DomoniqueMusiclover

4 жыл бұрын

@@MrThedwp I didn't know that. Well, I actually have never seen the movie..

@MrThedwp

4 жыл бұрын

@@DomoniqueMusiclover LOL I don't think too many people have seen it. Hell before this video I hadn't even heard of it haha

@DomoniqueMusiclover

4 жыл бұрын

@@MrThedwp haha

In “ flight“ The MD-80 has got winglets😂

@trspeter6528

4 жыл бұрын

yep 10/10 movie I mean MD-80 should have winglets for efficeincy

@happypapi1903

3 жыл бұрын

Nobody calls me Mad Dog! lol

I wonder what Kennedy Steve would say about that last clip... probably telling the pilots of the plane taking off “They must think your plane has VTOL capabilities” or something along those lines.

1:48 And they are in a 737 cockpit......

On the last one you have missed one. The stellar Airlines A330 is usually pitched up, and would almost stall, but still managed to land some how.

@askarmuk

10 ай бұрын

You can always stall around

The repainting of AA's fleet went all the way to 2017. So it's not unlikely that there was several 757s flying in that livery at the time the movie was filmed.

@bostonrailfan2427

8 ай бұрын

merged in 2013, movie filmed in 2014…it’s likely that few actually were repainted then and probably not ones used on lesser routes like a route to Costa Rica as was depicted

4:45 - January 2009 is before the Delta/US Airways LGA slot swap happened. While Delta definitely had a significant presence at the time, you probably would not have seen so many Delta aircraft waiting for takeoff (especially E-jets)

When you bring up the 757 landing in the old livery your forgetting that they were still a few 757’s in the old livery during that time, heck even today I still believed a few American airline planes are stilling flying around in the old colours

6:32.... Thats why we watch your videos 😂😂😂 well made

Difficult to spot, but in the movie Airplane, I'm almost 100 percent sure I saw a mistake if some sort.

@tomwilson2804

8 ай бұрын

Yes! The one, and likely only, mistake was the fact the inflatable autopilot had different colors when the movie came out.

@dx1450

7 ай бұрын

I seem to remember hearing propeller engines when showing a jet aircraft...

@JaneXemylixa

7 ай бұрын

I heard they wanted to use a prop plane, weren't allowed, went with a B707 but said whatever we're keeping the sound lol @@dx1450

2:03 Even in 2015, there were still a few American Airlines 757s painted in the old livery

8:14 you can tell that is the control tower in Sydney Australia, and not JFK Airport

@kristimajumdar2942

4 жыл бұрын

Your right. A quantas 777 wont be in jfk XD

If you really go into the details, you can see at 4:03 on the upper ECAM that there ware three main engine indicators, namely EPR, N1 and EGT. This configuration is only present on an A320 with IAE engines. The actual A320 of US Airways were equipped with CFM engines, therefore, only 2 main engine indicators should be present on the upper ECAM (N1 and EGT) :)

Also note: in Sully, the pushback scene showed IAE V2500 engines, even though the actual aircraft had CFM56 engines. The rest of the movie got it right, though.

@aydoyt

7 ай бұрын

Except for the fact on the radar tower the aircraft was shown as "USA1549" when it should have been "AWE1549". Easy mistake to no.

3:51 As a Parisian guy, I’d like to add that AA never and will never operate at ORY

3:03 you know this movie was probably shot in 2013,Edited in 2014 and published in 2015 And there is still some old american airlines 757 with the old livery

@Aviation18

4 жыл бұрын

Oh yeh no, I get that, I'm just saying for it to make a bit more sense it would've been better for them to get footage of a new livery 757, I mean I'm pretty sure there even some old liveries flying now

@alecairpaag

4 жыл бұрын

@@Aviation18 Also, I've seen Jurassic World once, but does it state in the movie like with subtitles or something that the movie events are actually taking place in 2015? Because it's just fiction, I'd probably let that one go.

@troyandrade435

3 жыл бұрын

@@alecairpaag For a while it was supposed to be in 2005 but later it was changed to 2015. I don't remember why though.

2:58 some American Airlines 757s were still using the old livery

What was the last one like what movie was it called so I can get it and watch it

Is it possible to operate 2 runways which are not parallel at the same time? 🤔 How is the wind direction if possible?

"American dc 10 turns into a 757" *harry potter and lliunami plays*

The ac-130 has guns only on one side as well.

@michaeldanks5975

4 жыл бұрын

...and gunners.

At 6:00 in the background ther is a Qantas 737-800 & Air New Zealand A320 at JFK.

At 7:18 you can see at the JFK scene, the a330s gear isnt tilted, the a330 gear is normally tilted

3:05 AA didn't repaint all their planes right away, and they kept some in the old livery.

@ryanr2371

4 жыл бұрын

theboredbrowser I have a picture of a American 737 in the old livery I took it in 2017

@AlbanyAviation2951751

4 жыл бұрын

Ryan R AA has a heritage livery in the 738, it still flies now

I am faster than how many mistakes can be pointed out

The aviation mistake that always gets me is in "Catch me if you can". While on the plane back to the United States there is a scene were Leo is looking out the window at JFK (I think) and mentions runway 44. I don't know how something like that even gets into a script in the first place let alone makes it into the final cut.

the "2:22" movie had the Stellar airlines a330 approaching JFK but when the scene of Touchdown is played, it shows Sydney Tower and Terminals.

The Jurassic World “Mistake” isn’t one because their are some old livery planes even today

@Xxfireman024xX

4 жыл бұрын

Tru

Maybe if Kennedy Steve was working it that wouldn’t have happened lol

3:46 This shot made me felt like that the cameraman didn't have time to shoot the AA DC-10 or the cameraman's camera's battery died or he didn't have enough time to turn his heads up and press the "record" button. so he recorded the AA 757 and pretended that there's nothing wrong with the movie.

6:22 does the GA950 pulls flap 1 ?

In Sully - When the engines fail, the call the right engine engine 1 and the left engine 2

"Sully" was based on a real historical aviation event... *_and some how fails to make sense with the La Garuda Airport scene_*

@Aviation18

4 жыл бұрын

Nasrul The Bunny finally someone get it! Lol, I’ve had so many comments saying it’s just a movie and it was filmed in 2016 😂 Thank you

also what is the last movie called?

in the last clip when the A-330 was taking off wouldn't he be at full power already or close to it? also he as at no throttle?

@joshuam20

4 жыл бұрын

simaviators Yeah he would probably be at around 95% at least so the 20% extra that this movie gives him is so much bullshit 😂.

I mean the American Airlines fleet probably will have still had a few old livery 757s in 2015

@PolishAviationStaffordshire

4 жыл бұрын

SplashDown Gaming They definitely did, I flew on N174AA (which was a One World logojet) in October 2015 and that was definitely in the old livery

American still had some of the old liveries on the 757 in 2017

What is the violin music at the end?

Btw.. when the Global a330 takes off, the flaps aren't half extended. Are they??

2:12 AC-130 have B737 cockpit ?!!

8:29 you didn't spot the control tower in the backround that actually belongs to Sydney International Airport

@dragonheartedcs4061

4 жыл бұрын

He said that it was part JFK and part SYD

With an Air Traffic Management background I must admit, I have never heard of and ATC Controller. For me an ATC is already an (AT) Controller. Or is it possible semantics like in the clips you pointed out?

For the final reason, Globe seemed to not be at full power? Or being able to takeoff at 750m?

5:30 *ATC controller* ay , ‘AirTrafficControllerController

"punch it" *Goes from like 20% to full thrust*

@happypapi1903

3 жыл бұрын

Chewy get us outta here, punch it!

Wut about the alarms that would ring in the ATC tower and the planes in '2:22'? Like TCAS in planes and the ground collision alarms in ATC tower(I don't know their official name) went on vacation or something?

fun fact, the movie sully was made in 2016. By then united airlines had most of their 737s with the split scimitar wings. The ones that didn't were in the hangar getting them. United airlines didn't want to remove the new split scimitar wings just for the sole purpose of a movie shot. So what they did is just put the continental livery on the planes and then repaint it back into the united airlines livery once the movie was over.

8:29 bruh that A330 turns into a 777 with winglets.

@6:44 THAT SCENE IS SUCH BULLSHIT: PLANES CAN DO ONE VERY SIMPLE MANOUVRE: A GO AROUND! boom whole movie solved 😅

0:49 as an addition: When intercepting an airplane just one fighterjet flies beside the intercepted aircraft. The second one is always behind it and ready to shoot it down.

Anyone know the name of the last movie?

The cockpit of the wannabe c130 was a 737 cockpit 😂

The last clip had me contemplating suicide.

Wait on the 5th one Wouldnt they be on toga thrust already?

I immediately noticed while watching sully in the cinema the United airlines split schimitar. On 8:28 if you also notice the back of the plane it looks like a back of a 777 but the plane is an a330 right?

@joshuam20

4 жыл бұрын

Elijah Lee No it’s a new plane the 773-300. Amazing work by Boeing and Airbus honestly.

Great video man! Believe it or not, (in reference to your #5) in 1974 someone actually did hi-jack an Army helicopter from nearby Tipton airport and flew around DC and ultimately landed the on the south lawn of the White house. Its worth reading about!

@aviation_nut

10 ай бұрын

I believe a Cessna landed on the White House lawn in the 90s, too. But the original point does still apply. Even if you were able to just walk into a military aircraft at Andrews, start engines, taxi, and takeoff, there's no way you'd be able to do that without anyone noticing. Forget shooting the guy out of the sky, the pilot wouldn't even make it to the runway. Now, let's say a spy managed to get enlisted and was dispatched for training. Then the guy might have a chance to at least start a turn towards DC, but that is unlikely to last long. I don't know much about training exercises for military, but I know enough that they have designated airspace to train in. Deviate from that, and you're a major risk for other traffic, even if you were just an idiot and made a wrong turn. They'd pick up on that very quickly and ensure you don't get any closer to DC.

4:16 *Depression has joined the chat for av geeks*

@TurtleRailTSR

4 жыл бұрын

Mittensishome -.- “av” geeks?

@ScottRothsroth0616

4 жыл бұрын

R.I.P. Continental Airlines.

@mittensishome-.-8786

4 жыл бұрын

@@TurtleRailTSR aviation geeks

@TurtleRailTSR

4 жыл бұрын

Mittensishome -.- Honestly, it is so easy to misunderstand that quote

What is the movie at 5:50 called?

@Aviation18

4 жыл бұрын

"2:22"

Indeed the launch airline for the split scimatar was Continental Airlines back in 2013 as part of their test for eco friendly fleet. They also for time had some 738 using bio fuel.

It's pronounced "Simitars" not "Scimitars."

Doesn't the Ac-130 only have barrels out one side the left side?

About the last one, im kinda new so.... does wake turbulance apply here? Edit: on this time 6:28

Dude that “brah” was the best thing to add to that scene. Been an airline pilot for over 6 years now and can attest that the scene made me cringe...then I laughed...then I cringed again... “punch it” Jesus Christ imagine how quickly a real ATC would be in prison for that stunt at JFK

@mike89128

4 жыл бұрын

Not to mention "Kennedy Steve" would have hung him out the tower to sway in the wind.

6:26 Qantas worrying about Project Sunset while Stellar Airlines is already serving JFK-SYD in a fraction of a second... Step up your game, Qantas 🤭😂

In the movie 2 22 right after the red plane lands you get a scene of it. But why is it a 777 with winglets, and not an a330?

the fact that in every movie of jurassic world there is one mistake in the movies or two

the aircraft on take off wasn't at full throttle well in to the take off run??????

@joshuam20

4 жыл бұрын

Jack Garner Nah it was at 95% which is what often happens, you see the last 5% is actually the turbo booster in an a330 and this actually allows the plane to reach takeoff speeds very very quickly.

6:13 This one guy pushes the throttle in half, how did he stand before if he only pushes it in half now?

Uhh, I’ve noticed a big issue with Star Wars can you help explain it?

Wouldn't the turbulence from the plane taking off cause the other to shoot in a random direction? (In the last one)