Top 3 Most Fuel-Efficient Twin-Engine GA Aircraft 2023-2024 | Price & Specs

Ғылым және технология

In today’s video, we’ll examine three of the most fuel-efficient twin-engine general aviation aircraft that you can still find in the market. Brace yourselves for a short but exciting episode, as we talk about their current price, technical specifications, performance numbers, and other interesting features that made a significant contribution to their inclusion here on our list.
Fuel economy is one of the most engaging talking points in aviation since this is among the few things that pilots have some level of control over. It goes without saying that fuel expenses can be cut significantly by adjusting power and other flight profile settings. And for those looking to buy a plane, fuel consumption is obviously a key factor as this directly correlates with the aircraft’s operating costs. Thus, finding an general aviation aircraft with the right fuel economy for the speed, range, and payload capacity expected from it, is critical in any successful mission. There are also many factors to consider when discussing fuel economy, such as the type of engine used, cruising speed, cabin space, useful load, and of course, the individual pilot’s technique. This makes it clear that certain aircraft models have some advantage over others, and that’s what we would like to tackle in this episode!
🛩️ If you enjoyed this episode, give us a LIKE, write a COMMENT, and SHARE the video!
🛩️ SUBSCRIBE and click the notification bell to get up-to-date with new uploads!
FOLLOW US:
/ aviationfederation
DONATE HERE:
www.buymeacoffee.com/AviationTV
OUR PLAYLIST:
• Top 5 Cheapest Private...
MORE VIDEOS:
Top 5 Most Fuel-Efficient 4-Seater Aircraft 2023-2024 | Price & Specs
• Top 5 Most Fuel-Effici...
Top 5 Most Fuel-Efficient Turboprop Aircraft 2022-2023 | Price & Specs
• Top 5 Most Fuel-Effici...
Top 5 Most Fuel-Efficient Private Jets 2022-2023 | Price & Specs
• Top 5 Most Fuel-Effici...
EXTRA INFO:
1:40 - Piper PA44 Seminole
© Piper Aircraft
Engine: Lycoming IO-360-B1G6
Fuel Consumption: 9 gal/hr
Useful Load: 1,191 lbs
Fuel Capacity: 108 gal
Passenger Capacity: 4 passengers
Price: US$ 660,000
3:57 - Diamond DA62
© Diamond Aircraft
Engine: 2x Austro Engine AE330 turbocharged
Fuel Consumption: 11.8 gal/hr
Useful Load: 1,545 lbs
Fuel Capacity: 86.4 gal
Passenger Capacity: 6 passengers
Price: US$ 1,290,000
6:22 - Tecnam P2006T
© Tecnam Aircraft
Engine: Rotax 912 S3
Fuel Consumption: 8 gal/hr
Useful Load: 906 lbs
Fuel Capacity: 52.8 gal
Passenger Capacity: 4 passengers
Price: US$ 625,000
8:37 - Questions
OTHER VIDEOS:
5 Most Economical Private Jets In The World
• 5 Most Economical Priv...
Piston and Turboprop engines | What is the difference?
• Piston and Turboprop e...
How Fuel Efficient Is An Airplane?
• How Fuel Efficient Is ...
DISCLAIMER:
The views expressed in our videos are our opinions and may not necessarily reflect those of the companies we feature.
Our content abides by the terms of Fair Use for education and commentary and the clips we feature in our editorials are owned by their respective copyright holders. The clips presented are for informational and non-commercial purposes only. For any business, media, or partnership inquiries, comment below or email: legal@emotionmedia.net
#FuelEfficient #TwinEngineAircraft #GeneralAviation #AviationFederation

Пікірлер: 43

  • @AviationFederation
    @AviationFederation Жыл бұрын

    Which twin-engine GA aircraft do you think better deserves the top spot? Did we miss anything that deserves to be on this list? To see more interesting fuel-efficient planes, check out these other videos:* Top 5 Most Fuel-Efficient 4-Seater Aircraft 2023-2024 | Price & Specs kzread.info/dash/bejne/o5N8tcGahtLPmNY.html Top 5 Most Fuel-Efficient Turboprop Aircraft 2022-2023 | Price & Specs kzread.info/dash/bejne/jJiNqZamorrJabQ.html Top 5 Most Fuel-Efficient Private Jets 2022-2023 | Price & Specs kzread.info/dash/bejne/f3iqk9OmlMzFgKw.html

  • @DanielMarquez-up3ul

    @DanielMarquez-up3ul

    11 ай бұрын

    piper seninole

  • @fngonzo
    @fngonzo Жыл бұрын

    I love the P2006, but I would put it in 2nd place because of the speed, range, payload, and use of AVgas. The DA62 should be number 1, in my opinion

  • @Lagrange1970

    @Lagrange1970

    Жыл бұрын

    Agree with you a 100%. Da62 is a better option and deserve first spot for sure

  • @danielnofal

    @danielnofal

    Жыл бұрын

    Cost 3 times as much!

  • @fngonzo

    @fngonzo

    Жыл бұрын

    @@danielnofal Yes, it does and you get a lot more for that price.

  • @danielnofal

    @danielnofal

    Жыл бұрын

    @@fngonzo I agree, just washing comparing apples to oranges

  • @clarencehopkins7832
    @clarencehopkins7832Ай бұрын

    Excellent stuff

  • @patshes1951
    @patshes1951 Жыл бұрын

    Like the Technam. Thanks for the content . You have a good voice

  • @AviationFederation

    @AviationFederation

    Жыл бұрын

    Thanks for watching!

  • @ch64621
    @ch64621 Жыл бұрын

    I did my instrument rating renewal on the P2006T back in 2015 in Brisbane, Australia, it is a nice aircraft to fly

  • @farooqishaq8700
    @farooqishaq8700 Жыл бұрын

    # 3 Looks More cool

  • @crsc1033
    @crsc1033 Жыл бұрын

    DA62 just such a sexy aircraft

  • @arnoldmarung
    @arnoldmarung Жыл бұрын

  • @captarmour
    @captarmour11 ай бұрын

    A stick like the Diamond, would be awesome in the Tecnam.

  • @AviationFederation

    @AviationFederation

    11 ай бұрын

    Using a control stick like the one in the Diamond aircraft could indeed be a great addition to the Tecnam. It can provide a different feel and control experience for pilots. What do you think are the advantages of having a stick control in the Tecnam, and do you have any other preferences when it comes to aircraft controls?

  • @captarmour

    @captarmour

    11 ай бұрын

    @@AviationFederation I have over 12000 hours on the 37 and 50 seat DHC-8 Turbo Prop. When doing our proficency checks every 6 months, while doing the engine failure after take off Terrain Clearance turn at 50ft, with a left engine failed in a left turn the yoke blocks enough of the flight instruments that makes it difficult to see them which is very distracting. The yoke has to be high enough to clear our legs so it is right up high between our eyes and the instruments. A stick can be low enough that no part of the instrument panel is blocked. A center stick also gives good situational awareness or spacial orientation and efficiency of movement as a move in one direction combines two movements of a yoke. A center stick allows use of any or both hands that a side stick makes very difficult to do. (Sprained a left wrist on an overnight once) It's probably more efficient to build as well. My 2 cents.

  • @fabiogoncalves9728
    @fabiogoncalves9728 Жыл бұрын

    DA-62 burns jet fuel. At least in my country (Brazil) it is being the best seller, for - at the end of the day - it delivers the most efficient fuel consumption x seat x mile. It is in such high demand here that Diamond signed an agreement with Aeromot to assemble it under license in the state of Rio Grande do Sul.

  • @AviationFederation

    @AviationFederation

    Жыл бұрын

    That’s interesting to know. Thanks for sharing.

  • @MadOgre
    @MadOgre11 ай бұрын

    How does the #2 aircraft beat the socks off of the #1 Aircraft? Who made this list?

  • @AviationFederation

    @AviationFederation

    11 ай бұрын

    The ranking of aircraft can vary depending on individual preferences and specific needs. The Tecnam P2006T and Diamond DA62 each have their strengths and weaknesses, making one more appealing to certain pilots than the other. It's essential to consider factors like mission, performance, and personal preferences when comparing aircraft. Out of curiosity, which factors or features do you value most in an aircraft?

  • @user-go3bg3kn8v
    @user-go3bg3kn8v2 ай бұрын

    I think the Diamond 6PX was the most impressive

  • @anusorntiyanon6539
    @anusorntiyanon6539 Жыл бұрын

    Pls don't forget about type of fuel.

  • @chrispoeschl7564
    @chrispoeschl7564 Жыл бұрын

    ❤️ The Florist…🌹

  • @user-SergeyK.
    @user-SergeyK. Жыл бұрын

    What the hell? Where the Piaggio avanti Evo?

  • @tatoo99999

    @tatoo99999

    6 ай бұрын

    That's a different league my friend.👍👍🍷

  • @airloo
    @airloo7 ай бұрын

    you say number one p2006 what is about p2012?

  • @KOUKAROS-GR
    @KOUKAROS-GR Жыл бұрын

    Instead of 62 you should place 42.. all should by same seat number right?

  • @philodonoghue3062
    @philodonoghue3062 Жыл бұрын

    My impression is English is not the voiceover’s first language. Tecnam, Diamond

  • @brianb-p6586

    @brianb-p6586

    Жыл бұрын

    I'm not even sure the voice is human.

  • @chippyjohn1

    @chippyjohn1

    3 ай бұрын

    Or educated. Who uses gallons and pounds etc.

  • @chippyjohn1

    @chippyjohn1

    3 ай бұрын

    Yak 18t

  • @andrewwright2812
    @andrewwright2812 Жыл бұрын

    Not to be mean but the voice over lady is saying ‘da’ instead of ‘the’. Why?

  • @brianb-p6586

    @brianb-p6586

    Жыл бұрын

    The "lady" is either a poor automated voice, or a person who does not really speak English.

  • @deldrader5260
    @deldrader5260 Жыл бұрын

    Very poor narrator. I re-played several portions and could not understand what she said

  • @davidelliott5843

    @davidelliott5843

    Жыл бұрын

    She’s a robo voice designed for adverts.

  • @kresimirmilisa5560
    @kresimirmilisa5560 Жыл бұрын

    i like the diamond da62 turboprop aircraft.

  • @KOUKAROS-GR

    @KOUKAROS-GR

    Жыл бұрын

    Is not turboprop …

  • @ubermenschen3636
    @ubermenschen3636 Жыл бұрын

    Best twin : Piaggio P180. Fast. Efficient. Luxury. Comfort.

  • @andrewkulon4776
    @andrewkulon4776 Жыл бұрын

    What she saying ? Best ??? Haha ha ! Seminole w T teil 160 / 800 C 320 F. 225 n / m 1750 n/ m distance service selling 30000 + -- claim rates 1750 f p m and C 310 J Q P Tc only 1200 range o little tiny detail single engin service celing from 15500 to 17500 oh girl flying this by self and by happy we gone keep our toys.

  • @tatoo99999
    @tatoo999996 ай бұрын

    I dont see any advantage for the tecnam, it is slow for a twin engine, the range is only 600 miles, useful payload with full tanks no bueno. Max operating altitude only 14000 feet. But with a single engine working it can not hold a good altitude, and climbing rates plunge. At the end that twin engine is underpower, and only represent a burden for the owner pocket( maintenence etc) . In my opinion the DA62 is the king in this category. Better in almost every single specs.

  • @AviationFederation

    @AviationFederation

    6 ай бұрын

    Got it! You're not impressed with the Tecnam and find the DA62 to be the real champion, especially in terms of fuel efficiency. Any specific experience or story that influenced your preference for the DA62?

  • @tatoo99999

    @tatoo99999

    6 ай бұрын

    @@AviationFederation the tecnam looks good,. And actually for the price is really a good player. But when you compare specs by specs, the DA62 is a superior plane. I know it is more expensive. But there are logical reasons behind it.

Келесі