The sounds of the sinking accompanying the appearance of a ship whose wreck already lies on the ocean floor is terrifying

Great virtual tour! We are all so used to the rusticle-covered ship that we see photos of all the time but it's so hard to imagine it would have looked brand new on the ocean floor for days or weeks after the accident. Really helps visualize something that we will never know the true appearance of. Props to you!

Nice work. How the ship looked the day after has always been a curious thought to me. Or 1-10 years later how would it have been then? No way to know but it’s fun to think about.

@DucknCoverin

2 жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/dqdor9CigZq4mJs.html pretty cool model depicting how the wreck would have looked shortly after the sinking

@kgisabeast

Жыл бұрын

Does anyone know when the technology was first available to have found it?

@LibraryofSofiyah

Жыл бұрын

@@kgisabeast considering that Ballard was funded by the military (primarily to find missing nuclear subs, and then allowed to search for Titanic afterwards), whatever it was, I doubt that it would have been around for very long until the ship was found. The military would be the first above all to develop anything incredibly advanced. Most of the easily available technological luxuries we take for granted today are likely to come from the military sector of research.

@thomaskositzki9424

Жыл бұрын

@@kgisabeast Bro, just look up on Wikipedia, when the "Titanic" was found. It was found in 1985. Being as prominent as she was, I'd say the technology was avaiable no more than five years before that.

@castlebravoli7

Жыл бұрын

@@kgisabeast the submersible Alvin was commissioned in 1964 so technically it could have been discovered anytime after that, but sending a crew down to look out a tiny window is a very expensive and impractical way to search for anything on the ocean floor. I'm not sure when sonar arrays good enough to locate the wreck at that depth were invented, or became available for hunting something besides Soviet submarines; a couple expeditions came very close in the early 80s a few years before Ballard, so probably mid-late 70s is the soonest she could have practically been found

Something to think about, when almost all of Europe was fighting eachother in the trenches, the first warplanes flying overhead, this beautiful ship, and lots of people resting on the ocean floor... Edit; Amazing video, really great work!!!

You my friend really deserve more views and subscribers, thank you for this masterpiece 😎

@OceanlinerDesigns

3 жыл бұрын

Thank YOU for watching!

It's interesting how intriguing the idea of 'the day after' is with TITANIC enthusiasts; I myself once started such a model of the bow and stern sections, but was forced to abandon it before I got very far. I DO know of other such 'day after' models made by modellers that WERE completed.

@neuralmute

2 жыл бұрын

I made an attempt to do a scale model of the wreck as it was when discovered in 1985, in a somewhat better preserved condition than it is at present. It ended up taking over my studio and my bathtub before I conceded (temporary) defeat, but I'm pretty sure I know what to do differently, technique and materials wise, so now I just need to find the space and the money to try again! Fun facts: rusticles are a lot of fun to build and paint! But the stern section is a nightmare - no building material is supposed to behave like a heap of half-cooked lasagne noodles.

I’ve been fascinated by the titanic ever since I heard this famous ocean liner and while I could see videos of the wreck 109 years later I was always imagining what she looked like a day after impact on the sea bed and now with this video I get to see for my own eyes may those 1500 souls Rest In Peace and for titanic you shall rest on the bottom for good amazing art,amazing camera shots,amazing detail your work is just incredible

amazing work my friend...as it turns out, the Dona Paz "Asia's Titanic" had a similar occurrence when she went down in that everything behind the bridge was essentially "Scalped" as she went down stern first (fire damage didn't exactly help structural integrity) and in the footage of the wreck the ENTIRE stern 3 deck "Island" was completely ripped off and it seems that the ships two sets of cargo cranes have either been "bent" out of view or completely removed by the forces as she was going down, and also the entire top deck and funnel (minus a bit of the bridge) has been completely torn off or pushed into the hull...its truly shocking how similar the wrecksites are

@OceanlinerDesigns

3 жыл бұрын

That's very interesting, I didn't know that. Hydrodynamic forces are really not something to mess with! Thanks for sharing. ~Mike

@wambutu7679

2 жыл бұрын

Do you know where such footage can be viewed?

@mariebcfhs9491

2 жыл бұрын

@@OceanlinerDesigns also the stern decks of Titanic collapsed due to implosion because it was not completely filled with water

@TheOneAndOnlyWeeber69

2 жыл бұрын

@@mariebcfhs9491 yeah

@jamesgroccia644

2 жыл бұрын

@@mariebcfhs9491 The escaping air was actually responsible for Titanic's poop deck initially peeling up, hydrodynamics finished the job on the way down. And as the stern imploded from the pressure, it spiraled in its descent to face the same direction as the bow on landing with a mighty thud and making the aft end of the liner look like a bomb went off

Beautifully illustrated and animated, and highly evocative.

oh my god! every single video of yours that i have watched have all given me one form of emotion or another. Not this one. It gave me isolation, both as a single feeling and as a collective loss. It felt both real and unreal at the same time. I felt alone when I was watching this, yet watching this I wasn't alone. Thank you Mike Brady for creating all this fantastic content. I appreciate the hard work you put into this and every other video you produce. thank you

I enjoyed this quite a lot. Amazing visuals and the sound was spot on for the subject matter. Very haunting.

Looks great, excellent work!

Loved this, really haunting and touching

Beautiful work

*_Chillingly horrific_* is the only way to describe this! Imagine if you had just come across this and had no knowledge of what had happened just a few hours ago? As another viewer said, it would be interesting to see what it might have looked like inside at various levels, from the boiler rooms up to the wheelhouse and passenger areas. What a sad mess it all was, really all put down to the British "Class System" of the time - shear pigheadedness! 😔 Well done on the animation, Mike. I'd like to see more of it.

This is great. We've only ever seen the wreck in an advanced state of decay, so I've always wondered what the ship looked like the day after it sank.

Amazing video, excelent work!!!

This was so eerie I love it

Very surreal and eerie feeling seeing this,

That was astounding. Thank you. Do you have any plans on showing the interior spaces as you imagine they would look at this time?

Fantastic work. I'm a big Titanic nerd. Hi from Toronto Canada 🇨🇦

I love your channel

Impressive....Thankyou.

That was actually pretty good.

May all who died rest in peace a and may no more suffer the same fate

I’m a little late, but great video nonetheless! You’ve gained yourself a new subscriber! Do you think you could do more of these, maybe the Lusitania showing the wreck immediately after hitting the bottom?

The wreck of the titanic represents how far ships became advance sinking is still a treat

Very morbid creepy yeah super cool it's not like I haven't thought about it I love it thank you! Rich

excellent - I was hoping to see something like this - as if mini subs found it within days of sicking - COOL- just COOL

@rextrek

3 жыл бұрын

Id Love to see this extended and more detailed :)

Impressive work. Is the entire scene avaiable or did you do just parts? I know it is a lot of work to take the 1985 and later findings and guesstimate back to 1912...

Love it the only thing I wish is that there was more stern footage

@thomazsouza199yyyyyy5

2 жыл бұрын

etgst fsg fha e e e s s s s a s s s f d

Really good work, but i would like to see the whole thing at once, is there a way i can look at this myself? Like a download link or something?

Nice idea, but it could be more interesting with overview of both sections of the ship.

I'd love see a time lapse of the interior, like the grand staircase. know any interior designers who are Titanic Enthusiasts? lol

@OceanlinerDesigns

2 жыл бұрын

Right! I’m working on something now to that effect :) ~Mike

Hours later after the sinking.

How long would the dust have taken to settle from such a mass hitting the ocean floor? I imagine things were still breaking loose and creating a stir for few days after the sinking. Things were floating upto the surface too.

I think Right away if this was shot right away after it landed there. The ship itsself everything should still be brand new. I think there should even be human remains in there yet. I heard it takes like 5 years for skeletons to disapear. I noticed that too. that the skeletons on dry land they find ones from 2,000 years ago. But in the deep sea they disolve. I think the first thing to go would be any food in the ship. That would go in Hours. Then After that all the bedding & Such would go next.

@thomasdaniels6824

3 жыл бұрын

In a speech Robert Ballard gave at Rhode Island, he said that since theres such a large portion of Titanics bow burried in the mud (like 50 feet) its very likely that what we cant see is perfectly preserved and that there is a possibility of human tissuse being preserved as well. He also talked about painting what is left with an apoxy based paint to preserve whats left.

i heard all the screams of men women and children trying to get on life boats and the band playing near my god to thee and the engines sounds were amazing my great great grandad went on the titanic but did not survive the event

Look like it would be one day later since she sank. That’s how titanic got colour and good condition before rusty.

What about a Timelapse of the wreck? How long does it take to be completely covered in rust?

Woah

Give me the link what does the picture look like. The titanic wreck. In this video

hauntingly beautiful to see the wreck when its not all dirty and rusty. How long did it take for her to get covered in rust?

@nlikos180

2 жыл бұрын

It would take a 5-10 years from 1912 maybe.

@bojack99

Жыл бұрын

It would have been dirty straight away

@MikaelLV

Жыл бұрын

Ocean life would claim it pretty fast and the rust-process started pretty much immediately, albeit slowly . It would look vastly different from this just a year or so later.

@bojack99

Жыл бұрын

@@MikaelLV the water is dirty...

@retrogamingguitarist5961

Жыл бұрын

Maybe 10-20 years? Ships that sink near the surface, where sunlight can reach them, get covered in marine life very quickly (see the USS Oriskany, which was scuttled as an artificial reef for scuba divers) but 2.5 miles down, things would happen much more slowly. I suspect the wreck would have remained relatively recognisable well into the fifties / sixties, had the technology have existed then to find and dive down to her.

This is what Titanic might've looked like the day after she sank

Didn't the nameplate go under when the forecastle went under around 1:30am?

I think I've seen a model builder making a model of the freshly sunken Titanic on YT

I want to see a video like this but if the titanic hitting the ocean floor.

@rhobot75

Жыл бұрын

Hello, here is a short clip w James Cameron and a CGI crew, shows the sinking and then the blast impact of each section hitting the ocean floor. kzread.info/dash/bejne/eId7x9Wkdt2rYNY.html. Cheers.

@johnnyh537

Жыл бұрын

@Rho Bot I've seen it. I want something more realistic you know what I mean. Also, love the name

wait wouldnt there be still at least some of the lifeboat davits still intact after the sinking? or at least in my opinion the break up part between funnel 3 and 4

@OceanlinerDesigns

3 жыл бұрын

The davits were mostly torn from the deck by, presumably, Titanic's funnel stays which whipped up the deck as the funnels tore off taking everything in their path. ~Mike

@captainAlex258

3 жыл бұрын

@@OceanlinerDesigns oh so thats why

0:30 You got that wrong....... One sailor in a boat said that the nameplate was immersed as early as 1:15 A.M

@IloveCruiseShips1912

3 ай бұрын

Which sailor reported it and which boat were they in out of interest?

4:10 She only reached 22,5 knots. Her topspeed was 24!

Spooky

Hold on why is one of the funnels still attached

I accually follow you in instagram

The crows nest is not there anymore, it was hit by a submarine and nocked into a cargo hatch

@definitely_notme4112

2 жыл бұрын

Do you pay attention to anything? This is how Titanic looked the day after she sank.

@JD-gx3ms

2 жыл бұрын

@@definitely_notme4112 no it is true the crows nest was ripped off by a sub in the 90s. The crows nest was on for the longest time

How could the nameplate disappear if the letters were incised into the hull?

@OceanlinerDesigns

2 жыл бұрын

“Disappeared beneath the waves” - as in the letters were submerged by the water as the ship sank into it.

@Hammerandhearth

2 жыл бұрын

@@OceanlinerDesigns ah, right. Sorry. I heard "nameplate" and just latched onto that conceptually.

Get to the Pursers SAFE!

Make the video show the whole halves!

I wonder what would have happened if the Titanic would have hit the iceberg head on instead of turning to avoid the iceberg? Would it have survived? You should make a video about that.

@eliel0503

Жыл бұрын

He did, actually kzread.info/dash/bejne/iImCq5qAnrfVdMo.html

Bit too dark.

april 15th 1912 2:45 am

She hit the Iceberg on the starboard side but why was there list towards the port side

@pelnapkins4379

2 жыл бұрын

It was due to the flooding within the ship, notably the Scotland road section, a large corridor on the port side of the ship. The list was partially to starboard until then. That's my understanding anyway.

@swigglyforce5215

Жыл бұрын

Because, one there was a bunch of coal they had to move to the port side of the ship, before she sank because of q fire, so that weighed it down, but also because while the ship was sinking, the d deck gangway door on the port side of the ship, was left open and let in water to the port side, and that combined with the weight of the coal, overcome the weight on the starboard side

50th Comment!

How much people sank with the ship?

@roadweary5252

2 жыл бұрын

1,496 died. It’s not known exactly how many physically went down with the ship.

@jamesgroccia644

2 жыл бұрын

@@roadweary5252 One could assume at least 100-250 people stayed on the stern, and a good majority were trapped within the liner because they didn't know how to go up to the boats. Most of the stairs between decks were behind hidden doors, so passengers couldn't see and therefore use them.

@roadweary5252

2 жыл бұрын

@@jamesgroccia644 agree completely

@mikoto7693

6 ай бұрын

It’s chilling to think that for a few years there would have been skeletons trapped inside that wreck. And that there still might be in the sections that are buried and preserved in the mud.

Bye bye submarine

👍👌👏😊❤️🇺🇲

Cargo hatch was not blown off by the force of the impact. The force of the pact was minor, but it rapidly started flooding the cargo hold. This compressed the air in the hold until the pressure was high enough to blow the hatch off. The sailor who saw the hatch had blown off, immediately reported to an officer that the hatch had blown off, which any competent sailor understood could only mean the ship was rapidly taking on water in the hold. This, and the initial report from the mail room that they were flooding was the first the Captain knew that she was taking on water… and as a result he sent someone down to assess the damage.

@TCR_710-Cap

2 жыл бұрын

Are you saying the #1 hatch cover blew off while the ship was still at the surface? Since it is believed that the foreship did not fall down in a straight vertical line, I wonder why then this hatch cover lies AHEAD of it on the seabed. I don't know about hatch #1, but I think hatch #2 and #3 in the fwd. welldeck were not enclosed trunks all the way down to the holds, they were open at each deck level in order for allowing to get cargo to these decks too. If hatch #1 was of the same design, no enclosed trunk all the way down, then air couldn't have been trapped. And in case I'm wrong, water flooding into a ship would never compress air to a degree that the hatch cover mountings would fail. If I recall correctly, air had been heard "whistling" out of the forepeak, and I can imagine this being the case for the #1 hatch cover as well. It is said that it was not the force of impact on the seafloor itself, but the water inside the foreship. The force of impact was so great that it crippled the foreship, maybe even reduced the height of decks deep down, and since water can't be compressed, but needed to go somewhere, it found its way through a weak spot - the #1 hatch cover. And with regard to the force of impact, the foreship hit the ground at a certain speed. I don't know how this could have been estimated or calculated, but the whole fwd section of the wreck features quite a lot hull damage, and this speaks for itself. Just my 0.02...

@christopherpardell4418

2 жыл бұрын

@@TCR_710-Cap A surviving officer reported that the hatch was reported as having been blown off. That was their first inkling that the ship was talking on water. You might be imagining the thing flying into the air, but the hatch cover was massive. It was simply no longer battened down and had been lifted and dislodged from its proper seat. It was reported as blown off, because aside from using the forward crane to lift it, that is the only way it could have come loose. Sudden buildup of pressure. Because it was loose, as her foredeck sank the hatch could have just slid away and planed to the bottom like a falling leaf,

@TCR_710-Cap

2 жыл бұрын

@@christopherpardell4418 Many thanks fpr your reply, I nevertheless doubt the physics behind it. It would be nice to know which officer it was, and during which of the inquiries he made that statement, and on which day, so that I can find it. If he just has been told, and haven't seen it by himself, well..., it's always a thin line between trusting the testimony or saying the physics are against it, and this without being disrespectful. For example, and this is not to serve as a comparison, in 2014 I was talking to Otto Höntzsch, a Bismarck-survivor, I think he was in his early nineties, and what he told me reflected details that are in today's history books, and not what he had testified in June 1941. Back to Titanic, with regard to the surviving officers, I know that at least two of them told different stories from one inquiry to another. So, which do we trust?

@christopherpardell4418

2 жыл бұрын

@@TCR_710-Cap The physics Requires the hatch to blow off. Think about it. First, holds are made water tight, which means they are air tight. In heavy seas, decks come awash, and so hatch covers are battened down to keep water out. Titanic drew 35 feet of water. Let’s say the leak happened at 25 feet below the water’s surface. At that depth, water pressure is over 2 atmospheres. 35 psi. Air pressure at sea level is 14.7 psi. That means that water can flood the hold until the pressure inside the hold ,matches the water pressure of the water coming in. That is a potential 20 PSI difference between the inside and outside of the hatch cover. A 12’ square hatch has a surface area of over 20,000 sq inches. That calcs to a force of over 400,000 pounds pushing UP on the hatch cover. That’s 200 TONS of pressure lifting on a hatch that weighs maybe a ton on its own. The pressure in the hold never had to get that high… it would simply have built until the force being applied exceed the strength of the bolts holding it on. That’s why every seaman knows that when you see a hatch cover off, you check the hull for water coming in.

@TCR_710-Cap

2 жыл бұрын

@@christopherpardell4418 Many thanks for tha math. Well, I do NOT consider water tight the same as air tight. It would mean that water and air had the same "main properties". So why then distinguish between them? And with regard to the hatch cover, I can imagine that it was "weather" tight, but I honestly have not idea. Same goes with the layout of the whole "cargo hold to hatch cover" structure. Was it an enclosed trunk from the f'c'sle all the way down to the hold, or was there access to it at each deck level? Can you please direct me to the officer's testimony? I believe it's online somewhere. Who was it? During which inquiry? On what day? English is not my first language, but I would like to know the exact wording and everything around. Any further help is highly appreciated!

what do u mean " this is how u would have seen her ", ur basically just coloring the titanic, its not based on reality. the decks that r collapsed may well be upright ,

The sounds and music.. so dumb