Check out the following article regarding the absurd Imamite claim, i.e., Ali ibn Abi Talib, may Allah be pleased with him, being allegedly mentioned by name in the Quran, and how to swiftly refute their 'proof' (spoof): ebnhussein.com/2024/02/06/how-lunatics-discover-the-name-of-ali-ibn-abi-talib-in-the-quran/

Every time I see something like this I say alhamdulillah that Allah has allowed me to follow ahlus sunnah wal jama'ah

@gems8167

5 ай бұрын

Alhamdulillah

Thanks for presenting Sheikh Uthman Al-Khamees. Such an excellent scholar and a specialist on Shi’ism.

May allah guide our shia brothers

@taminislami

5 ай бұрын

Ameen

@rally7358

5 ай бұрын

The only way is for them to reject the 12 Shiah heresy and become Sunnis. I know it can be done as I've seen it myself.

JazakALLAHukhairan

I thank my lord always that after being misguided for a brief period he allowed me to come.back to ahlus sunnah and see the clear kufr beliefs of the Shia. Alhumdulilah

SubhanAllah, may Allah guide the Shia to the Truth

@SunnahDiscourse

5 ай бұрын

Ameen! We wish nothing but guidance for the Shia masses.

@kingslayer8121

5 ай бұрын

How about we set our differences aside for the TIME BEING, at least, and unite our resouces and energy for Palestine? How about that?@@SunnahDiscourse

@TheSlaveOfAllah1992

5 ай бұрын

​​@@kingslayer8121Either you are ignorant or you are a shiite, which one is it? The houtis were killing the Sunnis in Yemen, the rafidah were killing the Sunnis in Iraq, Syria, Iran, Lebanon. It is not just Palestine. And the Muslims are in this humiliated state becouse we have abadoned Qur'an wa Sunnah. The Prophet Muhammed, peace and blessings be upon him, said, *When you partake in usury, hold on to the tails of cattle, become satisfied with cultivation and abandon Jihād, Allah will send upon you humiliation and He will not remove it until you return back to your religion* ..! You need to study, you need to learn your Deen, read the books of the Salaf, you find it online and offline. The rafidah always stabbed the Muslims in the back and joined the kuffar against the Muslims. History bear witness to this.

@kingslayer8121

5 ай бұрын

@Turkishmustacheman Then at least you and your people do something then lol oh chosen one, besides lip service

@uthman2281

5 ай бұрын

​@@kingslayer8121 Shiaism is not islam Shiaism is about 12 Idols Islam is about Allah

Sometimes they say dot (nuqta) in Allah is ali Some say alayah is ali and so on poor people can't even show real Quran as per them

SubhanAllah

Mashallah

Unbelievable!

Such a khurafat

Alsalaamu alaykum brothers could you make a video on "aba al sadiq" he claims hes the mahdi and has made many kufr statements such as; "i abdullah was sent with the 7th and final covenant", "Muhammad (saw) is Allah", "hijaab has nothing to do with religion", he also quotes a lot of shia sources, BaarakAllahu feekum

Do you have a video talking about the crack on the Ka'bah where the Shi'a claim that Ali ibn Abi Talib ر was born in the Ka'bah and therefore is a sign that he was the chosen one and the rightful caliph?

Al-Qur'an Al-'Adheem = Shi'te Kryptonite

Thats not even dua faraj

By Allah this is a fringe sheikh and not a majority shia belief the Quran remains unchanged and unaltered

Why add "discourse" to your title if you're going to censor and delete anything which opposes the strawman argument you're making about your opponents? The only time I've experienced something similar is under the Qadiyani channel where they deleted comments where I refuted their premises

All Shia need to go back to political Shia only wallah

الله يهدي هذا المجوس

we shias and you sunnies both agree on Ali(a.s.). I don't know how you interpret Ali's complaints about Omar and Abu Bakr? Bukhari and Sahih Muslim, which is your sources, there are hadiths deal with that. also Ali(a.s): Has God sent an incomplete religion that you (Sunnis) have followed "analogy"? Even if we want to "compare", how do we know we are doing it right? This is where Imam Ali said that sentence. With the departure of the Prophet, the responsibility of religious authority will carry to next "immaculate" person.

@yaseendev

3 ай бұрын

Stick to the topic in this video.

@yourfriends

3 ай бұрын

Why have imams why not prophets? What we Sunnis say about Ali is because he actually met the prophet and he was taught by him صلى الله عليه و وسلم

@khaledalkhobari8580

2 ай бұрын

The sahaba issue is just smoke screen, we don’t agree on anything. Ali (r) and him family (r) are innocent of you btw e worshipers

@yourfriends

2 ай бұрын

@@khaledalkhobari8580 I swear if Ali was the 1st Caliph & AbuBakr the 4th, they would find a way to curse Ali & worship Abu Bakr 😂

@yourfriends

2 ай бұрын

@@khaledalkhobari8580 The problem with tahreef is that you can’t authenticate hadeeth narrations, as in Shias can no longer prove a narration is weak or strong by checking whether it goes against the Quran A person cannot be a true Twelver Shi’ah except if he believes that the Quran is Muharaf! [1] While this might seem strange, what follows is even stranger. Ahl Al-Sunnah transmitted the Quran from the Prophet [May Blessings of Allah and Peace be upon him and his household] through Tawatur [2] and a multitude of widespread authentic chains. These Mushafs that are printed today, and people all over the world read from, are from one of these four narrations: The narration of Hafs from ‘Asim, and this is widespread in the Arabian Gulf, Egypt, Shaam, Iraq, and Yemen. The second is the narration of Warsh from Nafi’, and this is common in Morocco and Algeria. The third narration is that of Qalon from Nafi’, and it is widespread in Libya. The fourth is the narration of Al-Duwri from Abi ‘Amr, and this is common in Chad and the South of Sudan. In addition to these there are other narrations which are not that common among people, but are being taught in institutes and Universities. So ask [May Allah bless you, benefit you, and make you a benefit for others] … ask their scholars: Where is the Quran of Aal Al-Bayt? Where is the Mushaf which the Imams narrate and transmit from each other? Where is the chain of: Al-‘Askari from the way of Al-Hadi from Al- Jawad from Al-Ridaa form Al-Kazim from Al-Sadiq from Al-Baqir from Zayn Al-‘Abideen from Al-Husien (the grandson of the Prophet) or Al-Hasan (the grandson of the Prophet) from Ali [May Allah be pleased with them all]? Did the students of these Imams narrate everything from them except the Quran?!! Are the scholars of the Shi’ah capable of producing a chain of the Quran up to the Messenger [May Blessings of Allah and Peace be upon him and his household] without relying on or referring back to the chains of Ahl Al-Sunnah?!! I am definite that they are incapable of producing such a thing, so go back to them and check if they can correct me. What I think they will say to you, though, is: there is a narration, and it is the narration of Hamza Al-Zayaat from the way of Al-Sadiq from Al-Baqir from Zayn Al-‘Abideen from Al-Husien from Ali. This should raise another important question: Why is this being narrated by Hamza Al-Zayaat [3] from Al-Sadiq [4], and not by Al-Kazim [from Al-Sadiq]? And why isn’t Al-Kazim’s son: Al-Rida narrating this from him? And why isn’t Al-Jawad narrating it from Al-Rida … this is a very important point to pay attention to. Then I add to this another question to the Shi’ah: Where are your chains today to Hamza Al-Zayaat? And where is the recitation of Hamza Al-Zayaat being recited today? All the countries that the Shi’ah recite Quran in today follow: the narration of Hafs from ‘Asim, the narration of Warsh from Nafi’, the narration of Qalon from Nafi’, or the narration of Al-Duwri from Abi ‘Amr. Where is the narration of Hamza? I do not know of a Mushaf that is printed upon the narration of Hamza on this day. If the Companions were Apostates, especially the famous ones from among them, and they were the ones that transmitted the Quran: How can a Shi’ah trust the narration of those who he believe are Apostates? This Quran that is between our hands today, is from the narration of those companions of the Prophet [May Blessings of Allah and Peace be upon him and his household], and it is the one narrated by Hafs from the way of ‘Asim from Abi ‘Abdulrahman Al-Salami from ‘Uthman and Ali and Ubi and Zayd. Where is the chain of the Shi’ah to Hafs or to Warsh or to Qalon or to Al-Duwri? After answering these questions you would understand why we said that you will not be a shi’ah except if you say that the Quran had been subject to Tahreef. We add to this, that some Shi’a scholars, such as Ni’mat-u-Allah Al- Jazai’ri [5], Al-Nuri Al-Tabrasi [6] , and others proclaimed that Mutawatir narrations were transmitted from the infallible Imams stating that the Quran is Muharaf, yet you do not find even one narration from the Imams clearly stating that the Quran is free from any such Tahreef. The first to say that [the Quran is] free from Tahreef from their earlier scholars are four, they are: Al-Tabrasi Abu Ali[7], Al-Tusi[8] , Al-Murtada [9], and Al-Saduq [10]. As for Al-Mufeed [11] he has two sayings in this matter. It follows, that all those who claim to follow the Twelve Imams should also say [as their Imams are reported to have said] that the Quran has been subject to Tahreef, since the narrations that came from the way of the Imams attested to such a thing. As for those who don’t wish to follow the Imams and choose to follow someone else, like Al-Tusi, Al-Murtada, Al-Saduq, and Al-Tabrasi then that is their matter. For that reason you will find that the scholars of Ahl Al-Sunnah are strict in this matter, and say that whoever says that the Quran is Muharaf is a Kaffir, and they clearly declare such a thing based on what Allah the Exalted said: {Indeed, it is We who sent down the Qur'an and indeed, We will be its guardian}Hijr 15:9 . The scholars of the Shi’ah, on the other hand, do not say that, rather they just say that he who says such a thing is just mistaken. Many times we hear of a narration called “Hadith Al-Thaqalayn”, and the Thaqalayn as is known are: The Book of Allah, and Aal Al- Bayt. This tradition, which came in the Shiah books, state that the Quran is the Major [Thiql], and Aal Al-Bayt is the minor Thiql. So after this we say: Don’t all the scholars of the Shi’ah with no exception, say that the killers of Al-Husien [May Allah be pleased with him] are Apostates, since Al-Husien [May Allah be pleased with him] is a member of the minor Thiql, thus his killers are Apostates due to their attack on a member of the minor Thiql, based on this tradition. Yet they do not accuse any of those who attack the major Thiql, the Quran, of any of that?! For that reason a huge number … yes a huge number … from the big Shi’ah scholars said that the Quran is Muharaf. So do you accept these [scholars] as the symbols and heads of the Mazhab you are attributed to? [These are the scholars] whom you ask Allah to bestow his Mercy on, and whom you highly praise the knowledge and books they left behind. Do you know, May Allah Bless you, that Husien Al-Nuri Al- Tabrasi 13 said that the Noble Quran has ridiculous, silly verses (I ask refuge in Allah for me and you from such Apostasy)! I ask you: Is he after saying that a Muslim?! What he said can be found in his evil book: “Fasl Al-Khitab Fee Ithbaat Tahreef Kitab Rab Al-Arbab” . Go ask Shia scholars, ask them about the status of that man among the scholars of the Twelver Shiahs. If we do not stand up to defend the Quran, and we do not show animosity towards those who disrespect it, and do not free ourselves from those who attack it, then By Allah how can our Islam remain correct. Push Shia scholars, May Allah bless you, to declare all those who slander and attack the Quran as non Muslims, in the same way as they openly declare the Apostasy of the Nawasib [12] [May Allah curse them], even though the Nawasib showed animosity to humans i.e. the household of the Prophet. Why then don’t the Shiah scholars also declare as Apostates and curse those who show animosity or attack the Book of Allah the Exalted. As for us Ahl Al-Sunnah, we Praise Allah, who has guided us to the path where we do not distinguish between those who attack the Book of Allah, or the Household of the Messenger, or his Companions. We have one Manhaj in defending all that which is revered in this Religion. We show animosity and free ourselves from all those who attack the Book of Allah, rather we declare him as an Apostate, and we hate and free ourselves from all those who slander and attack the household of the Messenger [Blessings and Peace of Allah be upon him and his household] or the companions of our Prophet [Blessings of Allah and Peace upon him]. Shias will usually tell you about the burning, the goat & ibn umar like atheists do: You do realise the Qur'an is an oral tradition, don't you. If you can't accept this then I am afraid you have to become Sunni because the earliest traditions are Sunni. The earliest Hadith books are Sunni. The earliest Fiqh books are Sunni. The earliest 'Aqidah books are Sunni. The earliest Sirah books are Sunni. These were written several hundred years before Shiite books were written. Study and read the earliest books, and you will gain a good understanding. Shias might attempt to steal the chains in the Sunni books and attribute them to themselves, which is pathetic and shows the weakness of their way. `Asim bin abi al-Nujoud, Hafs bin Sulayman and Hamzah al-Zayyat are all great Imams of Ahlul-Sunnah, the Twelvers cannot prove that they were Rafidhi imami Shia neither through their books or ours. If they were to prove that they were Shia, the Shia of the time were Sunni in their worship, and even if they try their best to prove that they were Rafidhah, then even the Imamiyyah at the time had different sects all of them enemies who make Takfeer on each-other. By consensus`Asim and Hafs are two great Imams of Qira’at. The weakness attributed to Hafs is in regards to his skills as narrator, and the accusation of him being a liar is a baseless exaggeration. And if true still doesn’t strengthen Shia’s view. The rules for the authentication of a narrator in a Hadithi chain are different than the rules for the authentication of a Qur’ani recitation.

We are all muslims - dont spread hate for no reason FREE PALESTINE

@uthman2281

5 ай бұрын

You are pagan you worship 12 Idols Islam is about Allah not about 12 Idols

@tlp4454

4 ай бұрын

Yes, but shias arent muslim. They worship graves, disrespect Abu Bakr and Omar ra as well as call upon other thhan Allah

@uzbaig5952

4 ай бұрын

Are u dumb ? How can they be muslims if they say Qur'an has been changed( btw I mean the sect, as for individuals we withhold takfeer until their are told and explained first)? No wonder the nusra of Allah is not with us, instead of us becoming fearful of Allah and turning back to his religion, we instead want to make allies with the rafidah ??

If othman al khamees really is a man. He should accept the debate challange of yasser al habib.

@mzmi1422

5 ай бұрын

We wouldn’t even allow our little boys to debate yaseer alkhabeeth coz he is not worth it

@uthman2281

5 ай бұрын

Do you believe your 12 Idols or do you believe in Allah

@yawarabass3328

5 ай бұрын

​@@mzmi1422Let's have a debate with Hasan Allahyari... U will know ur status