These Crashes Show the Difference 20 Years Has Made to Car Safety | WIRED
Автокөліктер мен көлік құралдары
Watching car crash tests is horrifying and mesmerizing in equal measure. These crash tests show how much safer cars are after two decades of improved design.
Still haven’t subscribed to WIRED on KZread? ►► wrd.cm/15fP7B7
CONNECT WITH WIRED
Web: wired.com
Twitter: / wired
Facebook: / wired
Pinterest: / wired
Google+: plus.google.com/+WIRED
Instagram: / wired
Tumblr: / wired
Want even more? Subscribe to The Scene: bit.ly/subthescene
ABOUT WIRED
WIRED is where tomorrow is realized. Through thought-provoking stories and videos, WIRED explores the future of business, innovation, and culture.
These Crashes Show the Difference 20 Years Has Made to Car Safety | WIRED
Пікірлер: 174
they don't build them like they used to... aka rolling death traps
That's crazy, they're only going 40 mph, imagine when going on a freeway
@nickakers7985
7 жыл бұрын
eddy wolfe 40 is a good average speed to test at, on a highway an accident is often dispersed over a farther distance, maybe a few hundred feet, versus an on road crash at an intersection or into a tree where the car might come to an instant stop. Same reason rollovers can actually be a good thing in some cases, the energy is dispersed through more gradual means than a sudden stop. 40 in a way is the "most common worst case scenario"
@masterimbecile
7 жыл бұрын
Nick Akers That is quite fascinating. Thanks for sharing. Where can I read up more about this?
@exoticlemonlover
7 жыл бұрын
eddy wolfe into a metal barricade, not a car... cars give
@user-us5vh4db1e
5 жыл бұрын
On a freeway, people usually are killed in crashes. The modern safety construction of car only help people in impact at lower speeds. If you are in a crash at 70 mph, you will probably be killed even in new car.
@Victor-tl4dk
4 жыл бұрын
Your dead at freeway speeds, but it's also less likely you'll get into a crash on a frewway
This is actually 40 Years of crash improvements since the Rover 100 is a facelifted version of the 1980 Austin MiniMetro
Can't believe they'd smash that beautiful bel air like that
this is the very reason why I only buy 2010+ year model car
@5easy
7 жыл бұрын
i'm convinced
@terminator1562
3 жыл бұрын
You must be rich then
@Nexus104
2 жыл бұрын
@@terminator1562 used 2010s cars can be pretty cheap at a good condition.
@crestas9
2 жыл бұрын
@@terminator1562 bro 5-10k€ isn’t expensive
@mcglovera
15 күн бұрын
But older Volvos can out perform 2010
Their first clue that it was gonna suck should've been that it was a rover
Yea but what was the Rover 100 crash test rating in 1997? Was it a 5?
@Appletank8
7 жыл бұрын
That just meant standards were lower. Or, this could be a comparison of price. An equivalent priced vehicle is now pretty damn safe, you used to need to buy something more expensive for the same features.
@mrp7036
7 жыл бұрын
Like Sean 5516 said, it scored 1 star, plus the design of that car goes back to 1980. Hardly the fairest or most balanced depiction of crash standards in 1997...
IIHS raised the bar for car safety. The difference between private institution vs government institution. The NHTSA, government crash test, always lags behind IIHS.
@Psythik
7 ай бұрын
Whatever you say, Ron Swanson.
i hope they pass a bill to allow us to grow organs once all our organ donors from car crashes are gone
@geokramer1711
7 жыл бұрын
Bio-engineers are already working on 3d printing stem cells with patient DNA to create perfect replacements for their failing organs. Vastly reduces chances of rejection, increases availability for organ transplants and no one needs to die. What exciting times
@kristianblerche8443
7 жыл бұрын
religious nuts will prevent that from ever passing...
The legend27 can survive any car crash
I need this to be captioned to Spanish so I can send it to my father. I could totally do it (I've translated entire stand up monologues before) but the video is restricted. Help?
@ryanhaddad6815
4 жыл бұрын
choose "translate automatically"
can u guys test the UE megaboom just like the jambox speaker because UE (ultimate ears ) says it has a shock proof design and someone from UE droped one from a seven story building and litteraly nothing happens to it
This is more like an age gap of 35 years, instead of two decades. The makers of this video seemed to have conveniently forgotten that the design of the Rover 100 was derived from the Austin Metro, which was developed during the late seventies. If your goal is to show 20 years of progress in car (safety) design, it's not the age of individual vehicles that's relevant, but the age of the DESIGN!.
I’ve got a Rover 100 base model no airbags or many safety features if any but to be fair it was a 1980 car with a 90s body.
You can either have a super safe car, or a decently safe car and avoid head on collisions. I prefer the latter honestly.
@IcejjfishTbone
3 жыл бұрын
Most people with high driving skill can avoid these crashes. My friend has a roll cage and a harness in his car. He is more safe than most people. He has also taking professional racing lessons. There is one thing only worries about semi trucks. If there is one in front of him he slows down. One behind him and he goes 100mph just to avoid it
@swecreations
Жыл бұрын
@@IcejjfishTbone Your friend is not a safe driver
@SuperEthanShow200
Жыл бұрын
Or have a super safe car and drive it super safely. I have a very modern German car and I still drive defensively as if I'm in a 1950s death trap.
Why did they have to crash that '59 Bel Air ;-;
@dcs3395
7 жыл бұрын
Fuck the fresh prince, that's why.
@radityaprasetyo2059
6 жыл бұрын
Togrally i think ita the first cat they test it
Mile?
Very, very interesting
I drive a metro and mine doesn't even have an air bag😁
@oguzhanylmazer2479
5 жыл бұрын
no airbags we die like real men
@OxTheCurryMaster
4 жыл бұрын
then get a new car
Car sales boost.
This is so scary to watch and it’s not even real.
@Nexus104
2 жыл бұрын
That's all real, and not a simulation Done in a test facility
@steph4133
2 жыл бұрын
@@Nexus104 Yes I know, I meant not real as in actual people crashing like that on the roads.
@Nexus104
2 жыл бұрын
@@steph4133 oh i see Well have a good day i guess
way too many cuts i couldnt observe what was happening
personal note: 1:46 brilliant
What was the Rover 100 crash test rating in 1997?
@titan9259
3 жыл бұрын
Even in 1997 it was unacceptable.
@newwesterngrove
3 жыл бұрын
@@titan9259 Because it was based off the 1980 Austin MiniMetro
@titan9259
3 жыл бұрын
@@newwesterngrove Which is no surprise, some GM cars did very poorly in the IIHS tests.
@Nexus104
2 жыл бұрын
@@titan9259 hello titan!
ty
I couldn't watch that Chevy Impala get Rekt like that. It brought tears to my eyes
@agustinseguy
7 жыл бұрын
Vexed Knight it was a Bel air
@Brick-Life
4 жыл бұрын
i very happy destroy ugly old usa cars
what about g rating?
allow me to ride the metro
How fast are the cars tested at?
@raygetard3444
2 жыл бұрын
40 mph I believe
thats funny i dont see the radar or cameras or the computer that drives the car. Where exactly are the safety features.
@genericenbynix
7 жыл бұрын
The Acura shown does not have sticking up radar towers, instead they are in the top of the windscreen and the grille.
That Belair is missing 600lbs of iron block V8. BOTH drivers woulda been dead if they had tested a complete car. They might as well use Beamng for crash tests at this rate.
1959 chevrolet? What a waste
allow me to introduce jakata airbags
dude sounds like xbox ahoy
Yet the fools still says old cars are safer.
@2007NissanAltima
6 ай бұрын
They are as long as you dont buy too old or a car before 1990. They chose a tiny car which will always be unsafe.
Still rather have a 50s Chevy
I understand they want safety but they still need to allow the car to be just rigid enough that it doesn't total the car at a light impact such as 30 or 35 mph I can understand maybe 40 mph where it crushes it but these cars nowadays are so fragile that they Crush if you just barely touch something
@evacody1249
Ай бұрын
🤦♂️
Would rather have the 1990s car
That '59 Chevy would have won against that Rover easy.
@Nexus104
2 жыл бұрын
The occupants of the vehicle, would have absorb the impact, and of course heavy injuries
the comparison is wrong...A Rover isnt even so safe by todays standards in comparison with the other rivals...you had to compare a honda vs a honda
they should have used buicks
wow
Unless trump gets rid of these regulations too.
@kirklazarusiii3875
7 жыл бұрын
I don't see why he would
@cincy3662
7 жыл бұрын
no idea how this video can or will relate to Trump.
@AdAstraCompany
7 жыл бұрын
atomixfang How trendy, you tied an unrelated topic to the most overused subject! Gold star for you 🌟
@hindugoat2302
7 жыл бұрын
thats only in america man, trump dosnt relate to everything and everyone who cares if he makes americans unsafe keep that shit to yourself
@Steve-gv7qi
7 жыл бұрын
atomixfang 😭😭😭
Every car guy cringes at the crashing of that bel air
@genericenbynix
7 жыл бұрын
Not me.
Shame that modern cars are so ugly, and one has to stare at the badge to determine the make.
they need to make it safe enough that we can drink and drive and speed without dying change the design of the vehicle not the behavior of the driver
@DesertDog
7 жыл бұрын
Ankush, have you seen the roads out there? I am pretty sure 90% of drivers are quite literally, legally retarded.
Shouldn't be mandated. Every car is a studio apartment now. Won't have it. Useless junk.
Honda is far better manufacturer anyway. It is a Japanese car, and much better built and higher quality than American or European cars.
Please use kilometers instead of miles. Miles are only used in one country in the world.
@MoonBeamLaser
7 жыл бұрын
Guilherme - Milhouse the best country in the world* 😎
@GuilhermeMilhouse
7 жыл бұрын
MoonBeamLaser hhauahau I agree! I don't have problems about miles and kilometers notion. But other people may have no idea about the distance because they don't use it everyday day.
@MoonBeamLaser
7 жыл бұрын
Guilherme - Milhouse wasn't expecting a friendly response 🤔have a good day/night!
@ShishirGaire
7 жыл бұрын
WIRED is American so that's probably why, but yeah it makes sense to add both miles and km, especially on a video that mentions Europeans.
@lkpxml8124
7 жыл бұрын
U r wrong
As long as humans have some control over the car/truck we will have crashes.
@OhKnow379
3 жыл бұрын
Computers can’t be smarter than humans until they are only interacting with computers. Self driving cars are more efficient, cars are still stupidly inefficient. Public transport is safe, public transport is smart. I have no clue why America simply refuses to improve their public transportation system.
They destroyed the Belair for what? That was pointless. It's a classic with real value. If you're driving one of these you're probably fling it super slowly and carefully as not to get rock chips on the paint. :-)
@Jared-nu2tz
7 жыл бұрын
Dane Reid could've been a replica
@DaneReidVoiceOver
7 жыл бұрын
Jared Simpkins hopefully you are right
@Brick-Life
4 жыл бұрын
who cares destroy cars are fun just a old car
26th
Did you ever think about the people who doesnt give a fuck about safety ? No ! you only think about yourselves, keyless entries and push to start buttons ! Poor Chevy Bel Air Why ! Oh FF Sake Why ! What happened ? before cars used to represent personality now their just some disposable plastic garbage.
tesla blew them all out of the water with their first try.
@vxllfire
2 жыл бұрын
Volvo*
@raze3297
7 ай бұрын
Winner of the Most Poorly-Aged Comment
Seems a shame to crash a Bel air
compare the worst possible car from the 1990 to the safest car from 2016. thats fair... surly compare a 1990 honda civic to a new one. bet there wouldn't be as big of a difference
1:23 Really you're going to ruin a classic car for this shit.
@MajesticCow
7 жыл бұрын
BOMBON187 probably a replica man
First lol
Use metrics like 95% of the world.
@sunforged1662
6 жыл бұрын
Arc Kocsog There's a handy tool called Google.com
All things into account these situations usually don’t happen often however when they do they are quite deadly. If your car has a long hood that is a huge crumple zone which hill help in a crash unlike many modern cars. It depends on the specific car and the driver. If you are driving a 1970’s car with a 10 point roll cage and you get under a semi truck you will do better than most modern cars. If you are at freeway speeds say goodbye modern or classic. The tests in the video are on such extremes you don’t even understand 90% of you will never be in a crash like this. My classic has a 8 point roll cage and a harness. If I get into a crash my body isn’t moving.
@johnathan6642
10 ай бұрын
Body not moving is all well and good until you get impaled by the steering column
This is a very flawed test...
@genericenbynix
7 жыл бұрын
How?
@Sveinfyr
7 жыл бұрын
shouldve been a 20 y old car with 5 star rating back then vs a new car with 5 star rating nowadays...
@newwesterngrove
3 жыл бұрын
@@genericenbynix Because for the 1990s car they used a car which was just a facelifted 1980 Austin MiniMetro.
self driving cars are stupid
@ritvikmiglani
7 жыл бұрын
MMB Gaming and Stuffs why?
@kirklazarusiii3875
7 жыл бұрын
+Ritvik Miglani because it is making drivers lazy and dependent like a child and will only cause more headaches financial wise. I'm all for technology but not self driving tech, cruse control Is all I require.
@kirklazarusiii3875
7 жыл бұрын
+HoverBasic no thanks but I appreciate the offer
@chuckiphicus7675
7 жыл бұрын
+HoverBasic nahhh
@chuckiphicus7675
7 жыл бұрын
Ritvik Miglani because it takes the fun out of driving