Watch next: “Are they stupid?!” - Liz Truss economics explained kzread.info/dash/bejne/mpeA2ZqchJiyl9Y.html

@livefreeordie5769

Ай бұрын

Taxes * Income Tax * Capital Gains Tax * National Insurance * VAT * Council Tax * Corporation Tax * Dividend Tax * Bank payroll Tax * Petroleum Revenue Tax * Fuel Duties * Vehicle Tax - VED * SORN - Vehicles parked off road * Vehicle Registration * Vehicle MOT * Inheritance Tax * Stamp Duty * Tobacco Duties * Spirits Duties * Beer Duties * Wines Duties * Cider Duties * Betting & Gaming Duties * Air Passenger Duty * Insurance Premium Tax * Landfill Tax * Climate Change Levy * Aggregates Tax * Congestion Charge * ULEZ Stealth Taxes * Income Tax Threshold Freezes * Personal Savings Interest Threshold * Lifetime Allowance on Pensions * Parking Fines * Speeding Fines * Box Junction Fines * LTN Fines * AI Cameras.

@Wayne-wm6wq

27 күн бұрын

Where does it say in law that you have to pay it please

I plan on leaving the UK after living here 42 years. I have had enough of this countries rule, government and the whole lot!

@georgek3398

2 ай бұрын

I left during the thatcher years , came to Canada and never looked back

@jobbingactor

Ай бұрын

Where we going i’m coming with you.

@allisonbadgett2356

Ай бұрын

Bingo-that really is the answer history tells us this-Rise and Fall of the Roman Empire-excessive taxes eventually kill your country bc wealthy can leave so economy of country falls

@abringering2164

26 күн бұрын

Forget Canada and their stupid Trudeau. Canadians are moving to America. We’d love to show you what financial freedom looks like.

@martinnicholls9056

17 күн бұрын

You wouldn't want to move to New Zealand by any chance? If you do things are arguably a lot worse. We have become locked into Neoliberalism since 1984 and one of the parties (the ACT Party) was born out of the ashes of a betraying Labour Party that preceded it and we had an even worse government that followed - a National government with Ruth Richardson as Finance Minister where neoliberalism was expressed in an even more extreme and cruel way. She was so awful that not even Prime Minister, Jim Bolger, could stomach her any longer and sacked her. This is when our society became really unequal, but we had a voting system (MMP) that locked in a situation of political timidity that panders to the middle, swinging voters so nothing ever gets done, except for the benefit of the rich and so-called middle voters whose interests are purely for themselves and what they can get out of the government's so-called promises. The latest government has a National prime minister who was CEO of Air New Zealand and wants to run the government along corporate lines. National has two coalition partners who claim to have a mandate for their vile policies, including trashing the environment and destroying what's left of out natural biodiversity for so-called development projects (chosen by three undemocratic ministers) including mining, and more roads at the expense of rail, coastal shipping, cycling and walking - all at the expense of managing CO2 emissions and consequent global warming. They're also taking an axe to the health system, social welfare, all for protecting the interests of the wealthy. If they have a plan for anything, they haven't communicated it to long-suffering New Zealanders. They're New Zealand's answer to Boeing, but we can only hope that either they develop some sense and compassion or they're voted out as a one-term government. The two coalition partners (ACT and New Zealand First) claim to have been given a mandate to put forward their insane and insulting policies that retraumatises Maori in a racist and neo-colonial fit of pique by the ACT leader, but, between them, they only got around 17% of the vote, compared with the more left wing Green Party that got over 13% alone. Their claim to have a mandate is hardly credible and they are the tail of a very small chihuahua wagging a large St Bernard, nevertheless they hold the balance of power. All three coalition partners are New Zealand's political answer to Boeing and just as incompetent and, dare I say, corrupt. It is hard to believe that the British Tories are any worse than what we have here, but hearing Liz Truss and Jacob Rees-Mogg speak I'm hardly filled with confidence. It seems as if it's Prince Andrew running the country and determining policy.

I would argue that this tax system is one of the reasons we have low economic growth because it doesn’t encourage us to be productive. Why would anyone with lots of money invest in new factories and technologies when they can buy and sell assets, such as property, which will earn more money than working on something that improves the countries ability/productivity in producing something like a good or service?

@MrEdrftgyuji

7 ай бұрын

Not to mention, when you earn over £50k a year, you are considered to be "rich," and half of everything over that goes to the government. Meanwhile, buying a modest house in London would cost you £600k minimum.

@MarkSinnottIreland

7 ай бұрын

It demotivates work and actually encourages people to go on the dole.

@farmideas

7 ай бұрын

You have hit the mail on the head. Investing in production, through company shares has a level of risk which is far greater than teh risk involved in owning property. So house prices rise, benefiting existing owners, and companies find themselves borrowing at terms which are difficult to pay.

@A190xx

7 ай бұрын

Harry Lambert suggests we take money from those who have acquired more and give it to those have less. Who would work harder knowing they will have to hand it over to those that work less?

@philwells4341

7 ай бұрын

@@A190xx If I have interpreted your point correctly, it depends on how it's acquired and then depends on where it goes. If it's simply tax the rich more and then hand it out in 'out of work' benefits then i agree, it stops aspiration of those who strive as they climb into greater wealth. If you tax capital gains the same as you would income, then invest that into proper healthcare, education, transport and improving deprived areas then it creates more options for those less well off to become strivers themselves. The current tax situation perpetuates inequality of choice and options available. Society can't help those who won't help themselves, but it should at least provide help to those who choose to do so. I can't see the current system doing that and we need money to help them.

I am particularly upset as high earner. I just worked over a year to earn a significant bonus. The tax burden is so high, it prevents me or anyone from ever becoming wealthy as an employee. The only path to true wealth is via the limited company/corporation.

@user-wj7cv9hb5j

Ай бұрын

Ir35 destroyed a lot of workers. Tax is 2 high.. not worth working, let others pay the tax for benefits.. everyone should do it, make life a lot less stressful.

@tarquin161234

Ай бұрын

Don't forget trusts and offshoring, which is where most of the country's hidden wealth and corruption, centered in the City of London, right under our very noses.

@SibylleHyde

26 күн бұрын

It's true. Work is taxed much more highly compared to income from property.

@SibylleHyde

24 күн бұрын

@@johntbaxter Actually no. When I was working my marginal tax rate was 48%. Now that I live of capital gains it's 10% when I sell assets.

@AntonyClayton-eq1ul

18 күн бұрын

For profit corporation of the treasury is double-dealing. Tricking natural, living breathing men / women workers into accepting imposed liability to pay, on the part of a 'person' - a legal fiction corporate entity. But you are not liable, being not a "person". Or body of "persons" corporate or un incorporate. However, the choice is a personal one. But keep feeding the cash hungry monster and it will devour you all. It is following the WEF-led plan of you all owing NOTHING - not even the work you do; and being happy about it. Caveat emptor.

The irony that an ad popped up halfway through this video claiming you can make 1 million tax free through commercial property

As a business owner I've reached a point where I now see little to no value in investing further in my own business. Any potential increase in returns is so punitively taxed that it's no longer attractive in any way shape or form. The bigger problem I see is there's no viable alternative to the shambles we currently have in power. We have two major political parties that are simply varying degrees of right with seemingly nothing new on offer. I'm in my 50's and I've never before reached a point where I don't feel there is a party who I feel inclined to support. I genuinely see no viable party right now.

@FlyingDarkLord

7 ай бұрын

Agree 👍🏼

@PazLeBon

7 ай бұрын

nothing wrong with having a small business. everynoe nowadays wants to own the world ;)

@ReedoAce

7 ай бұрын

It’s a sell out country. Chaos/ civil turmoil shortly

@dddddbbb

7 ай бұрын

Do what other corporations do - take on lots of debt so you in theory have zero profits whilst paying yourself big dividends.

@StarMan_2018

7 ай бұрын

@@PazLeBonno not everyone wants to “own the world”. Not even the top 10% want to own the world. You only need an income of £60k to be in the top 10%. And the top 1% only earn £173k per year. Sounds a lot I know, and I wish that was me… but even that is not a tremendous amount of money. No it’s only about one or two dozen people in total who really want to “own the world”. Most people just want to own a decent home, have a nice car, go on holiday every year and be able to retire without worrying. The top 1% are still just small fry’s.

I love that these corrupt politicians are being found out by these intelligent people. People are finally awakening to these corrupt and illegal schemes that is being imposed on them.

@nyakwarObat

7 ай бұрын

"Finally waking up", what have they been doing to date to just be waking up? Partying? Pathetic..🙄

@SergeyKamenezki

7 ай бұрын

Sounds like bunch of populistic leftie propoganda. Wealth tax is what it is. You'll try to tax these people with higher taxes they'll move the money out and you'll get nothing. For them it's easier to move capital then for regular people. Many have tried and failed. There has to be another solution than take from rich give to the poor. Never worked and never will.

@Steveo5541

6 ай бұрын

Great comment more and more citizens of the U.K. are understanding how deeply corrupt our politicians are. Slowly but surely more of the corruption will be exposed

@hoonaticbloggs5402

6 ай бұрын

@@nyakwarObat😂😂 The tax scheme is as old as the hills.

@Worms_Pro

6 ай бұрын

And politicians are all corrupt. All the decent people are killed and murdered.

The utilization of after-tax money and tax-free growth makes opening a Roth IRA very advantageous. Through a careful guidance of my FA, I did not pay taxes on my withdrawals of $2.86 million when I retired.

@TheresaAnderson-kf5xw

5 ай бұрын

I don't regret the numerous financial mistakes I've made in the past since I've learnt from them. But the biggest one was planning my finances without consulting with a licensed financial counsel.

@maryHenokNft

5 ай бұрын

Indeed, I did make use of a financial counselor. As I get closer to retirement, their advice has been really helpful. I thought compound interest on index funds wouldn't be sufficient because I started late. It's amusing how I've done better than colleagues who have more years of investment experience. I've profited more than $886k tax free.

@maggysterling33254

5 ай бұрын

@@maryHenokNft Please who is the consultant that assists you with your investment and if you don't mind, how do I get in touch with them?

@StellaMaris-lv2uq

5 ай бұрын

Thanks for the advice. The search for your coach was simple. I investigated her well before using her services. Considering her résumé, she appears competent.

@portaltaker

2 ай бұрын

Shut up bot

You guys are men after my own heart. You've outlined how corrupt and unfair the tax system is in this country

@SB-dg8hq

6 ай бұрын

They are freeloaders that wants other people to pay their council tax. Council tax is for local services like schools, social care, rubbish collection and recycling, street lights, police, fire brigade etc etc, If you live in a community you should pay towards that community. Those young men have been getting handouts all their lives, now when it's time to put something back they are stretching their necks to find someone else to pay for them. How very typical of the entitlement generation.

@terryj50

5 ай бұрын

The tax system is unfair when most people are on 16hr contracts they pay nothing in you need to get people working and paying in.

@dougharris4853

4 ай бұрын

Correct and yet we need to reform the tax system. How do you start when it the system is set up to benefit the ultra rich

@markblance8492

2 ай бұрын

Everyone complains the tax system is unfair. The bigger injustice is taking our hard earned taxes and giving it away to those who don’t want to work. Britain has grown into a country of work shy, I want something for nothing sofa slugs. The rest of us work hard to keep them…. Get those who can work into work, then let’s have a debate on increased taxation. STOP over taxing those of us who do work….! to pay for those who choose not to work. STOP draining our social services to pay for the lazy.

It is has always amazed me that we tax actual work progressively at 20%, 40% and 45% but capitals gains tax is lower at 10% and 20% (18% and 28% for residential property). So you literally get taxed more for producing goods and services and contributing to the economy than being lucky enough to own assets and doing nothing to earn that the return on those assets.

@janeknight3597

7 ай бұрын

And of course there is National insurance that stops at a certain level that never seems to be updated.

@NorthDownReader

7 ай бұрын

"lucky enough to own assets and doing nothing to earn that the return on those assets." Because CGT is not indexed against inflation you can be taxed for making a loss on those assets in real terms.

@adrianthoroughgood1191

7 ай бұрын

When you include NI the real tax rates are 32%,42%.

@parametr

7 ай бұрын

@@NorthDownReader income is not indexed against inflation either. CGT is lower because rich people run the country.

@julianshepherd2038

7 ай бұрын

Gordon Brown changed the system. Blue Labour.

Cut budget of prisons: more drugs and overfull prisons. Cut budget to rebuild schools: pupils cannot attend crumbling schools. Cut budgets to Councils: roads are terrible, councils going bust, poor social services, poor children's services. The list of years of cutting budgets is our country becoming crap.

@connclissmann6514

7 ай бұрын

The issue is where did the money flow? The video suggests just the asset rich got wealthier.

@lonyo5377

7 ай бұрын

Legalise and tax cannabis. Less for police to deal with, and more tax income. Spend it all on renewable generation to reduce energy costs

@Etheoma

7 ай бұрын

To be fair my person opinion is that if you are an adult you should be able to put whatever you want in your own body and we should be legalizing and taxing drugs because all drug criminalization does is create a revenue stream for criminals, costs police time and tax payer money locking people away, and I mean all drugs. This would need to come with labelling to be like this can cause X, Y and Z and for drugs that do cause aggression-which I would like to point out alcohol is worse than most illicit drugs when it comes to that-a special that this drug is known to cause excess aggressive tendencies and that if you commit a violent crime while under it's influence you will be subject to forced rehab and a longer jail sentence. This is not to actually stop people committing violent crimes while under the influence, it's cautionary so that people are less likely to take it in the first place and if they do they take precessions so they can't hurt anyone else before they take it. Also you would be taking a chunk of that tax money from the sale of drugs and putting it into rehabilitation clinics and public awareness of drugs and legalization has been shown to decrease the rate at which people take drugs, almost eliminate overdosing, cutting off a funding source for organized crime and the rest of the supply chain for the illicit production and distribution of illegal drugs and putting it in the hands of people above board which will bluster the economy. There is nothing but up sides for legalization as long as you enable good quality treatment for addiction.

@angelachanelhuang1651

7 ай бұрын

HSBC is people's banks

@patmcgee3061

7 ай бұрын

My energy company sends me a bill which say that all of the energy I use is from 100% renewable sources, but it is no cheaper than anyone else’s.

Taxes * Income Tax * Capital Gains Tax * National Insurance * VAT * Council Tax * Corporation Tax * Dividend Tax * Bank payroll Tax * Petroleum Revenue Tax * Fuel Duties * Vehicle Tax - VED * SORN - Vehicles parked off road * Vehicle Registration * Vehicle MOT * Inheritance Tax * Stamp Duty * Tobacco Duties * Spirits Duties * Beer Duties * Wines Duties * Cider Duties * Betting & Gaming Duties * Air Passenger Duty * Insurance Premium Tax * Landfill Tax * Climate Change Levy * Aggregates Tax * Congestion Charge * ULEZ Stealth Taxes * Income Tax Threshold Freezes * Personal Savings Interest Threshold * Lifetime Allowance on Pensions * Parking Fines * Speeding Fines * Box Junction Fines * LTN Fines * AI Cameras

@docgraal485

Ай бұрын

I’m 18 right now and I’m terrified

@SibylleHyde

26 күн бұрын

😂 you forgot gambling duty 😂

@ApexCypher_

26 күн бұрын

@@SibylleHyde 🤣 It’s number 22 on the list but thanks 🙏🏼 😀

@SibylleHyde

25 күн бұрын

Oops

@user-kq5qp6dh8l

25 күн бұрын

And many more😵‍💫

We need more of these people in politics

@karenmadden7825

7 ай бұрын

I daresay they do.. but choose to put their boss and doners in money profit gain

@andrewjackson8089

6 ай бұрын

Communists?

The UK tax code should be a compulsory topic in state school curriculums. Tory politicians are practiced, professional (many are lawyers) liars. Teach students about the facts of the economic environment and their welfare so they can recognise a liar or a grifter when they see and hear them, and vote accordingly.

@Boghopper1979

7 ай бұрын

What's with the hatred of lawyers? All they do is try to make sure their clients are treated impartially in line with the laws of the land. Property lawyers, family lawyers, public defence defence lawyers....

@angelachanelhuang1651

7 ай бұрын

cool

@bobnob4393

7 ай бұрын

It's very obvious why they don't do this. Educating people about taxes would do nothing to maintain the status quo

@WhichDoctor1

7 ай бұрын

That’s why Labour are ruling it out. They aren’t thinking about how to appeal to the public, they are desperately scared of turning the wealthy people who run our media and fund our politics against them. starmar is trying to sound amorphously progressive while not actually threatening the wealth and power of the people who make fortunes and gain ever more influence from the system as it’s currently run

@steveporritt1550

7 ай бұрын

Just teaching them where money is created would be a good start, practically no one understands Fractional Reserve Banking. How inflation is a stealth tax and the basics of the Austrian school of economics should also be on the curriculum.

Would agree , I earn about £1300 after tax per month my council tax is £1260 per year. Its a big chunk of my already taxed pay.

@kinggeoffrey3801

7 ай бұрын

Blame Thatcher. She brought in the council tax to stop us average folk having too much power. In the 80s, too many people were becoming mortgage free before they reached 40. They all had numerous properties as an extra income stream. 30 plus years later, most people will die with a mortgage. Her plan worked a treat.

@nataliam9764

7 ай бұрын

In Italy, I was paying €45 per year on council tax.

@truthhasnofeelings5245

7 ай бұрын

Don’t forget all the other taxes we pay as well, how did the previous generations allow this.. they have allowed this take over and now we are finished.

@tomjones8715

Ай бұрын

Ever asked your self where that goes?

keep in mind that you can't 'spend' the value of your house, council tax is paid from earned (and taxed) income. This creates a problem seen in the US, where homeowners house value ends up taxing them out of the ownership of their home.

Unfair taxes for me are 1. Inheritance tax, my father worked hard all his life, lived a meagre existence hence built up some savings to have a good part of it taken away by IHT. He has already paid tax on his earnings, but a double whammy to have it taxed again. 2. Tax on interest on savings previously taxed. The country is in dire straights financially due to covid, green policies and the fact that 50% of the population are net drains , not contributors to the country. I don't see an easy answer, taxes are unfair undesirable but a necessity.

This is an amazing conversation between two intelligent, articulate, and engaging young men. I was interested from start to finish. We need more people voicing sensible, reasonable and forward-thinking ideas such as this. Is it not too late to get these guys into politics? Thank you NS for this sort of content. You’ve got a new subscriber.

@NewStatesman

7 ай бұрын

Thanks, and welcome!

@JB_inks

7 ай бұрын

​@@NewStatesmanagreed, well done everyone involved

@valuetraveler2026

7 ай бұрын

future is looking good but it will take a while...maybe another ten years or so

@PazLeBon

7 ай бұрын

@@valuetraveler2026 ive heard that for 5 decades almost lol, the only one with a actual feelgood factor for most people were in the 90s

@evolassunglasses4673

7 ай бұрын

But Globalisation destroyed the nation state democracy decades ago unfortunately.

0:23: 📰 The tax code in Britain is heavily skewed in favor of wealth over work, landlords over tenants, and richer homeowners over poorer ones, with almost all inherited capital being passed on untaxed. 2:45: 💰 The speaker proposes various reforms that could raise significant sums of money, such as using property tax to fund local services. 5:46: 📊 The video discusses the difference in tax rates between income and capital gains, using Rishi Sunak as an example. 8:46: 💰 The value of privately held assets in the UK has doubled since Tony Blair came into power relative to GDP, indicating a significant increase in wealth inequality. 11:29: 🗣 The speaker discusses the difference between nominal and real spending, the challenges of cutting public services, and the impact of Tony Blair on the Labour Party. 13:56: 📊 The British public is more conservative on tax policy and social issues than politicians realize. 17:08: 🤔 The speaker discusses the tough decisions that need to be made in politics, including the child benefit cap and tax burdens. Recap by Tammy AI

@ambition112

7 ай бұрын

Thanks for sharing it! Saving my time with useful time stamps! where you get this AI summary tool Tammy AI??

@aldozilli1293

7 ай бұрын

The mega rich are the issue, the top 1% not the others making decent income with small limited companies yet these are the ones who get hit most and pay in the most tax relatively.

@nicktecky55

7 ай бұрын

"...almost all inherited capital being passed on untaxed." Classic Tricky Dicky BS we expect from Labour. Will it be policy to remove the family home provisions? After all, we can't have all those modest 3 bed semis being passed on, can we? They are usually below the threshold now. That's "untaxed inherited capital" after all. Labour has always detested the aspirational working class, so are they going to stick to type? With 75% of the land stolen from the English people 1000 years ago still in the hands of the descendants, surely it is way beyond time to rectify this injustice? No need to be punitive, just take the estates into public ownership without compensation as 'reparations' for the misdeeds of the past. Hell will freeze over first, even Benn wasn't allowed to mention it. Widow's pensions? After all, they are funded from "inherited capital" aren't they? Grandstanding? Smokescreening? Choose to suit. The country is now governed by an avowed Thatcherite, and the prospective Labour PM is an avowed Blairite, and has stuffed his future cabinet with ditto clones. Nothing at all will change that favours working people. I wonder what Penny Mordant's policies will be? The next five years are a write off already.

@elinys2843

7 ай бұрын

@@Michael-ur3on the rich don’t own the majority of their wealth in person, there’s funds and firms that own their real estate, their art works, their investments, … , so their children won’t be taxed on all of the wealth. Your mums complete capital/wealth was hers, so you pay 40% on all of it.

@raymonddonaghy2314

7 ай бұрын

Inheritance tax should of never been allowed totally illegal

I think we are too obsessed about the economy crashing. In the right sense, the economy never crashes. It just undergoes cycles, and almost always recovers. So I really don't care what the predictions are. I just want to grow my investment portfolio. I read that lots of folks are making multi-figures as incomes despite the downturn. Any tips on how to make substantial progress in earning?

@linsey.

6 ай бұрын

Nobody knows anything! You need to create your own process, manage risk and stick to the plan, through thick or thin, while also continuously learning from mistakes and improving.

@Agatha207

6 ай бұрын

But the professionals are still crushing it right now because they have both the necessary approach to pull off a profit in the market plus access to insider market knowledge that isn’t made public.

@Hoffmanluiz.

6 ай бұрын

Exactly why i enjoy market decisions being guided by a professional, seeing that their entire skillset is built around going long and short at the same time both employing risk management and market experience, been using the expertise and guidance of John Desmond Heppolette, for over 5years+ and I've netted over $3million in that time frame..

@Campbell957

6 ай бұрын

I've shuffled through a few financial advisor in the past, but settled with John Desmond Heppolette. The strategy he use is recession-proof, more specifically profit-oriented, and most likely, you'd find his basic info on the net, he's a renowned advisor.

@Barbara0015

6 ай бұрын

Thanks for the information! I just discovered his exceptional resume when I made a research of his full names online. He appears knowledgeable and well accredited. I drop him a message and book a call session with him!

A breath of fresh air. Some clear thinking and a willingness to discuss the deep rooted issues driving inequality in Britain ... and propose solutions.

I was born towards the end of WW11, spent some years teaching the tax system for the old Workers Education Association. I would simply write a few examples of earnings on the black board and apply the tax system to the numbers. The title of my class ... If folks knew how the taxation system works, there would be a revolution. So no change here then.

@judeirwin2222

7 ай бұрын

World War eleven?? God, I must have been asleep longer than I’d intended!

@Boghopper1979

7 ай бұрын

​@@judeirwin2222Lucky you missed 4 but 8 was a corker!

@w1swh1

7 ай бұрын

I remember my father complaining, when I was 5 years old, about austerity and how "we all have to tighten our belts". I am now 76! Yes nothing changes.

@jusw

7 ай бұрын

Should we hope he is a terminator sent from the future to destroy the burgeoning AI industry...?

@factstrumpprejudice6740

7 ай бұрын

@@jusw I laughed.

Thanks for bringing light to this. I was astonished that Labour didn’t make any noise about this when Starmer and Sunak were made to publish their tax returns.

@shabbydabbydo314

7 ай бұрын

Of course, with members leaving Labour -where do you think labours record funding is coming from?

@bahriboy

7 ай бұрын

I'm not surprised. There's a reason Labour HQ was always anti Corbyn.

@M896

7 ай бұрын

@@shabbydabbydo314 That sentence doesn't even make sense

@shabbydabbydo314

7 ай бұрын

@@M896 think about it...

@carvoloco4229

7 ай бұрын

No, really, it doesn't. Try writing it again, please.

Some economists have projected that both the U.S. and parts of Europe could slip into a recession for a portion of 2023. A global recession, defined as a contraction in annual global per capita income, is more rare because China and emerging markets often grow faster than more developed economies. Essentially the world economy is considered to be in recession if economic growth falls behind population growth...

@crystaljune473

5 ай бұрын

Emotionally-charged decisions to sell off large quantities of stocks or other investments now lock in your losses, removing any chance for future growth.

@fisayofosudo538

5 ай бұрын

A 2022 Northwestern Mutual study found that 75% of U.S. adults admit their financial planning needs improvement. However, only 29% of Americans work with a financial advisor.

@Jessrobbie

5 ай бұрын

Very correct; the bear market has contributed significantly to the growth of my investment. I was able to quickly increase my portfolio from $180K to $472K. Essentially, I was just doing as my financial advisor instructed. You're good to go as long as you get competent assistance.

@devoncampbell275

5 ай бұрын

​@@JessrobbieWould it be okay if I asked you to recommend this specific advisor or company that you used their services? Seems you've figured it all out.

@Jessrobbie

5 ай бұрын

​@devoncampbell275: I personally have my portfolio overseen by California-based wealth advisor and fixed income strategist at that 'Britney Cohen Rose > Pro' well established and you'd find her professional bio on the net. However I suggHowever look closer to home, sometimes to move certain amount of money I am required to be in California.

Young people like this give me hope for the future. Unfortunately, Britain has been governed for far too long by rich men born into generational wealth, intent on preserving their privilege. Taxing wealth is the solution to a better society, if only someone in power has the courage to do it.

The government could turn around the country overnight by shutting down the offshore tax evasion and money laundering system. If the government recovered this revenue it would fund the NHS five times over every year and lower the retirement age to fifty or double the state pension. Incredible figures!

@yoshua9676

2 ай бұрын

The rich will just leave.

As a 73 year old person who works full time and draws some pensions I pay more tax than Rishi. Wow!!!

@maneshipocrates2264

7 ай бұрын

Sad indeed. That is why they always say any tax reform is a 'socialist thing'. They have fooled us all for so long.

@tabsntoot

7 ай бұрын

Respect

@zuzanazuscinova5209

7 ай бұрын

More income tax, not tax overall.

@arthurdixon5890

7 ай бұрын

@@zuzanazuscinova5209 Oh that’s OK then.

@angelachanelhuang1651

7 ай бұрын

ok

Freezing tax thresholds is a tax on the poor ,they should be ashamed

Fantastic discussion! This is why I’m all for bringing in and allowing young minds to thrive.

I don't think enough is also understood as to why its a bad idea for the richest part of society to have so much money. It reduces a persons opportunity in their own career to be dropped into a world of the rich. Sure they are happy to let you work as a bartender, a cleaner or an office job but a lot of the higher paying/prestigious jobs are ring fenced for the friends and children of the wealthy.

@markblance8492

2 ай бұрын

Ring fenced jobs for the rich….! Do you know how industry works? I would suggest, higher roles are only available to them because they were afforded private education and a position in the top universities (similar to the two presenters). No business can afford to employ an under-performer, it simply does not happen. However I agree, if you are lucky enough to be afforded a private education and position in a top University, you stand a higher chance of being successful and securing a top job. This is the only privilege the wealthy have…… and is a product of an our failing education system and ridiculous university costs. Scrap university fees for British people and more have the opportunity of higher paid jobs.

As a middle aged man who has lived through a boom and bust recession, credit crunch and austerity I’ve seen our public sector whittled away and our core services hollowed out. I’ve seen the asset-rich buy their way into a different reality, with private schools and private hospitals. The interests of the country are best served with levelling up and I’d like to see an increase in economic equality. Unearned and unequal wealth should be taxed in a meaningful way.

Relying on Labour for any sensible solution is naive in the extreme. They’ve only ever made things worse.

My only concern with the normalizing of Council Tax to 0.5% is that you'd end up with the same problems as the American schooling system. If the Council halves the tax rate but is a higher-need area, then the area will suffer with a reduced tax take. I assume, therefore, that such a proposal would involve some kind of re-balancing of incomes across councils. It might have been useful to elaborate on that a bit more.

@whatacruelchoice

4 ай бұрын

Rebalancing council rates would have a lot of effects. Wages can be lower if rates are lower. There could be more disparity in purchases power between authorities than there already is. Property values are also very dynamic change the upkeep costs substantially and prices will fly off in unpredictable directions.

@Mac10213

4 ай бұрын

Completely agree. Avg house price in Burnley is 133k. .5% is around £600 p/a. London’s average is £750k, so .5% is £3750. If London are paying 6x the same CT, how can Burnley expect the same standard of services.

@Pes60

2 ай бұрын

Landowners would just put the rent up to cover them paying council tax if they had to pay it.

@meljen8592

2 ай бұрын

If you follow the American economy,the old adage of they sneeze,we catch a cold,is very pertinent,American property taxes are out of control,uk council tax,potentially rising too unaffordable levels.

Tax rates are generally geared towards protecting the wealthy. Some things never change.

@angelachanelhuang1651

7 ай бұрын

uk is not real

@paulmessenger9836

7 ай бұрын

Who would invest with high tax returns

@justgeneric2876

7 ай бұрын

We have low investment compared to us so who invests anyway

@MrEdrftgyuji

7 ай бұрын

It is more to do with stopping the poor becoming rich.

@carlyndolphin

7 ай бұрын

I’m self made multimillionaire. Why should I pay more tax?

I'm not always blown away by New Statesman's coverage but credit to them for doing this. I am sick to death of Labour's completely nonsensical approach to the economy going uncritiqued or somehow accepted as 'grown-up politics'. Their approach is completely inadequate for dealing with the inequality that now exists.

@sjewitt22

7 ай бұрын

Ns went against labour when they promoted policies they now talk about.

@mhtbfecsq1

7 ай бұрын

What's the Tories approach? Crash the economy and lose 100's of billions a year through cronyism /corruption, Brexit & political skulduggery and general managed decline of the pillars of society which are inextricably linked to the performance of the economy, then bully and steal from the poor to give to the mega wealthy who have more money than they know what to do with and through their spending patterns drive up asset prices while being taxed less than someone on 37k.

@spectre750

7 ай бұрын

Because there is not Tory or Labour any more. They are all part of the globalist uni-party following the WEF mantra of UN agenda 2030.

@wolfen210959

7 ай бұрын

Aye, the Tories have done a much better job than Labour, and will continue to do so, in the run-up to winning the next GE. /s

@mhtbfecsq1

7 ай бұрын

@@wolfen210959 Yea good one. You probably believe Jimmy Savile cared about young people too right?

0.5% council tax is not going to help farmers in areas with high property prices!

Excellent interview. Refreshing to have two young guys calmly point out the injustices of the UK tax system without resorting to accusatory or emotive language. We need calm heads, analytical minds to get us out of this mess.

It's an interesting idea, but I see a couple of flaws: 1. If councils in poorer areas are currently effectively charging 1.5% of a house's value for council tax, and London is charging about 0.1%, surely if you change it to 0.5%, poorer councils now have less money and London has even more. Doesn't feel like levelling up much. 2. You assume that an increase in the value of an asset equals an increase in the amount of money the owner has. I bought my house for £90k in 2000, it's now worth £300k. I earn less now than I did then. The increase in value of my house only exists when I sell it, and then I need to buy somewhere else to live. Somewhere else that has also increased in cost. The money doesn't exist.

@Bussellification

7 ай бұрын

I'd probably propose councils sharing out the council tax raised around the country, so richer councils get the same as they do now and poor councils receive a 'subsidy' as such. When a property is your main residence you don't pay capital gains on it when its sold if you buy another place. You only pay stamp duty on the new property being bought. It would affect wealthy buying a selling property that isn't main residence and also their shares in stocks or any other asset they sell at a profit.

@user-vm7eg3jc4e

7 ай бұрын

Councils don't receive the money that is raised in their area from council tax. Council tax goes to the UK central government who then give a proportion back out to local councils which isn't necessarily reflective of the council tax base.

@seanb9530

7 ай бұрын

This is cr#p! You seem to miss the fact that people have quite often paid income tax to create their wealth. If investments have made a capital gain they have taken the investment risk to achieve that gain. We all have access to the same services regardless of the value of our house. The main problem in the UK is too many on benefits that shouldn't be.

@buzudbuzu

7 ай бұрын

On paper all ideas are brilliant, when you come to implement them, most are not viable. Ok you remove the renters from paying the council tax - What will the landlord do? Pass it over to the tenant, meaning rent increase. Just like Business rates (from ANY business) are passed over to consumers.

@IAMShteve

7 ай бұрын

@@user-vm7eg3jc4e Have you got anything to back that up? If it's true, why do councils try to increase their local council tax to make up for funding shortfalls?

The problem with the interview is that the speaker is wrong. If you pay income tax on £1m of income you pay £430k of tax, so a rate of 43% not 37%. Adding in National Insurance (effectively a tax) you pay £454k. So the tax take on a £1m salary is effectively 45%. So you start working in Apr and you get to keep what you earn from about Sep onwards. The comment that the tax rate is c.37% is wrong; its closer to 50%.

Couple genuine questions on the council tax points. 1) won’t linking council tax to the owner rather than the occupier just result in increased rent and difficulty assigning discounts for students and single occupants? 2) if done on a % of home value how would the home value be calculated and how often would it be recalculated?

Some interesting ideas. However, there are always reactions and responses to changes in tax policy. For instance moving the responsibility for council tax from the tenant to the landlord will simply see rental costs increase for the tenant and no extra tax. The idea of equalising council tax based on property prices makes complete sense (I thought that was the original intention of the tax? I maybe wrong), but would need to be accompanied by changes in central govt funding for councils. In principle, I agree with increasing wealth taxes, but it's worth pointing out that the UK already raises twice as much tax on property than the OECD average (UK 12%, OECD avg. 6%). So, a realignment, as suggested in the video, should be the focus. The other thing to point out is that the main reason, I believe, that gov'ts avoid increasing tax on wealth is because of the fear around capital flight. The UK is so reliant on private, mainly foreign investment (due to 50+ years of govt neglect, waste, and selling off of our national assets), that changes in this area would need to consider the reactions of private investors. I don't like it, but I believe this is where we are.

@Ttdogi

Ай бұрын

The higher the rent, the more valuable the property, the more it pays in tax. Simple raising rent makes it less profitable and property is forced to be less valuable. Your point is null, georgism ftw

Great piece! Unfortunately, many politicians on both sides of the fence are part of the "asset class" and consequently, they don't want to implement real change to taxation on assets. It's the same here in Australia, where the ALP merely tinkers at the periphery, but won't really hit the upper end of asset holders as hard as they should.

Would like to read the whole of Harry’s articles - where can I find it. Such a thought provoking piece xx

@NewStatesman

7 ай бұрын

Thanks for your feedback, glad you enjoyed the video. The link to the article is in the description.

UK just has contempt for her people.

THIS is what journalism should be like.

The tax system of Britain seems to be carefully calibrated to screw over precisely the middle classes responsible for the majority of the country's economic output, seemingly to stop them getting ideas above their station and joining the ranks of the elites by becoming properly wealthy while obfuscating its unfairness (not many people realise the income tax system has a peak marginal rate of 60%, higher than even the Scandi countries. You can thank Alastair Darling for that and the Tories for hanging on to it). My own income tax/NI burden comes out around 40%, once you start adding in the myriad stealth taxes it's more like 50% or possibly more of my earnings ending up in Treasury coffers to fund...something. Unfortunately, Mr Lambert puts a little too much faith in Labour to rebalance things. I won't be surprised if they wind up imposing a new wealth tax on the wealthy (who can quickly escape the country) while simultaneously increasing income taxes to screw over the middle class (who can't leave so easily) even more, all to fund...something.

@Garcia061

7 ай бұрын

Absolutely

@vairagya108

7 ай бұрын

great comment

@Alaron251

6 ай бұрын

100%. Because the ultimate goal of western elites is the stratification of us, and them. There will be no economic ladder. Simply the sewers and the ivory towers. No in between.

This starts on the false premise that the rich barely pay any tax and the poor pay the lion's share, which is the opposite of reality. The top one per cent pay 30 per cent of all income tax revenues. Now if 1 person owns a 3 bed semi in an outer suburb of Liverpool and another a 3 bed semi in central London, the council tax paid on each respectively will be similar, yet a much higher percentage of the Liverpool house's value. There is nothing fundamentally unfair about that, as both would be costing their councils in services, a similar amount. By that point under 5 minutes in, I'd heard more than enough bollocks to continue.

Superb piece. Well presented at a level which is accessible to all. Very informative giving well argued alternatives to current policies.

As someone who works in the tax industry and used to journalists butchering details, I was pleasantly surprised by this. I think an important part to mention is that when they talk about council tax and CGT etc. they need to clarify that it is about the effective rate in relation the value of their home/gain rather than that the wealthy are paying less (although in some cases I’m sure they are). I might be biased as an Irishman but I think the UK could learn a bit from the Irish tax system, where although there are high income taxes, we at least have a CGT rate of 33% which cuts in very quickly. We also have a gift tax as well as an inheritance tax which drastically increases the amount of IHT that is paid. There are annual allowances (which should by right be bigger) and lifetime allowances. The gift/inheritance tax rate is 33%, not 40%. In addition to help family business and farmers pass things to the next generation there is a 90% deduction to the value of gifts. I think it would level the playing field a small bit.

I completely agree that the taxation system needs to change as Harry explains, but also the loopholes that enable the super rich to move their assets offshore need to be addressed. Also, wealth inequality has increased since the early 80's (neoliberalism). I think that there is a real appetite for change e.g. public ownership of national infrastructure seems to becoming more popular. Water companies pumping sewage into our rivers whilst paying huge dividends, or train companies subsidised by the tax payer running a mediocre service whilst paying billions to shareholders make no sense.

@michaeloconnor9465

7 ай бұрын

I do despair when people moan about dividend payments to share holders. People have to remember that pension funds fund pension payments via dividend payments. Anybody who has a pension private or workplace is an indirect shareholder's and receives dividend payments indirectly via the value of their pension. What should be taught in school is how to buy shares and create a passive income. School does not teach how money works and how to create wealth. I am sure it would catch the imagination of many kids who under achieve, who see no way but to stay poor working in most jobs. Their ambition becomes to join a gang and make easy money selling drugs. The wealthy do not want the state educated children to understand how money works. They want to keep that privilege for their own children. I talk to many people about share ownership and building a passive income. Their answer is that you understand that, I don't. The reason they don't understand share ownership is because they were never taught how money works in school. They learn how to get a credit card but are not taught how to use and manage credit cards and how to make credit work for them. I hardly buy everything outright with my capital, I use interest-free credit to pay for nearly everything and then use my capital to work for me. Share ownership is not about a quick buck but a long term investments to build dividend payments for later in life and achieve financial security.

@ernestthesmallholder559

7 ай бұрын

@@michaeloconnor9465 I agree, Knowledge of the advantages of share ownership (which is true public ownership) is hard to come by in state schools and it is only when you get to university that you meet people who can help. I suggest people contact the share foundation (Gavin Oldham) who can help.

@PrinceBarin77

7 ай бұрын

Can you elaborate on the loopholes you describe? Curious to know, if you were moving abroad (either to retire or for a job opportunity), would you be happy to have the value of your assets (including savings and house sale proceeds) taxed on exit?

@therealrobertbirchall

7 ай бұрын

​@michaeloconnor9465 one man's passive income is another man's enslavement

@3DJay429

7 ай бұрын

The wealthy should have the freedom to move their assets offshore, as those assets belong to them. In a world that values freedom, individuals should have the right to relocate if their current residence doesn't align with their beliefs.

British taxes, insurance systems and other fees you get to pay are ridiculous. Council tax, TV license, per person car insurance...

Imagine thinking Labour MPs don't use tax avoidance...THEYRE ALL DOING IT !!

The UK tax system just encourages evasion !

@gitgudgaming506

7 ай бұрын

All tax systems encourage you to use the law to your advantage. Tax system aims to encourage economic activity. The average working person can reduce the tax they pay by paying into their pension more, investing into S&S ISA that is free from tax, and there are lots of ways to reduce your tax burden legally as a ltd company. The average person can do all these things.

@skrich9690

7 ай бұрын

Especially by those people who preside over it.

With the English political duopoly system (Labour vs Conservative) it is virtually impossible to change the status quo. It requires a system with many different political parties, each of which has a main topic on the program (e.g. tax). And where the 'tax party' in a coalition government can get its policy through. Other parties with other topics on the program can get their policy through. This is how a society changes for the better. 😉

@richardhorton25

7 ай бұрын

Your solution shows that PR is a pre-requisite - we can only hope that reform of the Lords with a PR elected second assembly takes away the fear of change for the governing assembly

@mandrakejake

7 ай бұрын

We need individual representation. We have the technology..

@johntowers1213

7 ай бұрын

Does it work though? a brief look at some of the multi party setups around the world shows lots of governments that simply cant get anything done due to lack of consensus or when they do reach major decisions its often done at the price of bold change where interest groups use their bargaining power to water down or change the policy or program to their own benefit not necessarily to the betterment of those its meant to serve.. I don't disagree that what we have now is a catastrophic mess for a whole host of reasons, but one thing a single party majority can get you is decisive action, where the issue then becomes putting the right people in power that align with the actual needs and wants of the populous, something we've soundly failed at for decades. TL/DR Coalition rule can help stop policy's you don't want being rammed through, but it does so at the cost of holding back policy that you do want to see come to pass in a timely fashion...

@PazLeBon

7 ай бұрын

@@richardhorton25 can you imagine the peoplewho get voted in tho? they be love island contenstants :/

@wolfen210959

7 ай бұрын

Sadly, that would require a better form of democracy than currently exists, anywhere in the world. Most countries of the world have a duopoly system, even if it was not intended to be, simply because most people in the democracy are "centrists", therefore most political parties straddle that "centrist" line, with occasional periods of extremes. This inevitably leads to a left of centre party, and a right of centre party, with additional minority parties usually campaigning on a single issue, such as the Green Party here in the UK. The main difference here in the UK is that we only have one party on the right, and many parties on the left, therefore the right leaning party tends to win more elections, as the left leaning parties are contesting with each other for their share of the vote. I understand that there are countries which have a PR type system, but most of those are still dominated by one of two parties opposed to each other.

How refreshing to hear a sensible discussion about wealth redistribution. Reading some of the comments below I wonder how many people watching really understand the main difference of this argument. The government needs tax revenues to do stuff (hospitals, education, army, police, social services etc.). Suggesting that the richest people (in terms of WEALTH not just income) in the country pay more tax seems eminently sensible to me. Statements like "how would a retired teacher living in a £1m house in London be able to pay more if the Council tax was changed to be 0.5% of a property's value" blow my mind. Sell your house and buy a property valued at £500,000 or move from London and buy a similar property elsewhere for even less. Look at public services over the past 20 years. Everyone I ask if living in the UK has got better or worse over the past 20 years replies "worse". We need serious change.

Very well explained ... ultimately the rich are the people who write the tax laws...

Canadian fan of the program. This was one of the best videos NS has done for youtube. Mr. Lambert took the audience through the major taxation ideas for their consideration at the next election. No other UK media outlet has done the job he did. Interviewer asked great questions. On all the other media channels, focus is often placed on comparison of UK to G7 or EU financial results. That would be the only minor criticism I have of this interview.

@tsubadaikhan6332

7 ай бұрын

I'm Australian, and agree completely. This is a conversation that needs to happen in all countries with ageing populations, growing wealth inequality, and unattainable housing expenses.

@sumitmadan768

7 ай бұрын

Agree as well as a Canadian living for the last year in London and seeing so many similarities on how inequality is getting intitutionalised.

i work 7 days a week pushing a hoover & mop about. I have 2 jobs one is £15 per hour & the other is £11.50 per hour. I am basically working one job to pay my tax, national insurance my rent & council tax.

@stewartlewis3503

7 ай бұрын

The reason for the backlash against Globalisation. The income and lifestyle any job can provide a person is ceasing to be determined by the country they live in and the norms of that country, and increasingly now by the 'Global' average lifestyle for that job. Well done for being a cleaner, it's a valuable and important job, but say India with its approximately 20% of the global population. Do you think the average cleaner in India lives the lifestyle of a working class person in the UK, possibly a 'proper' place to live, schooling, public health services, possibly a car, a holiday, a smart phone a holiday? Or do you think they live in abject poverty in a slum?

Ye i stopped paying taxes years ago. I hate thus world. I had to escape, im living in my van off my own back self reliant and loving life in freedom and sticking one up at the government. Im working part time and enjoying nature and getting to know my true spirit. Lets stand together and show our greedy governing powers we will not let them scre us anymore. Stand up for ourselves, dont let fear rule you. We are amazing qnd have such powers inside.

consider changing personal taxation to match the business model, this may result in a giant leap for the economy.

This is wild! There’s barely a difference between torries and so called labour, to hell with them all. It’s the perfect time for a party who actually care about the people to emerge

@Boghopper1979

7 ай бұрын

In a first past the post system, your best option is to support the least worst viable option. Anything else just helps the worst viable option. If you want to support more nuanced parties (rather than broad church parties like Torys and Labour) and expect them to have any power, then you need proportional representation first.

@CUNDUNDO

7 ай бұрын

There is no one single party on the face of the earth who cares about the people, human beings only care about themselves not others !

As long it's fair for both sides poor and rich. Having capital gains tax almost half the percentage of income tax is a great example of the system being fundamentally broken.

@PazLeBon

7 ай бұрын

why should it be fair to rich folk? if i take half a multi millioniars money is he poor? ;)

What a lot of people don’t know is that the top 10% of earners pay 90% of the tax. The issue now is that anyone on over £125k is paying 60% tax. That’s why 12,500 millionaires have left the UK since 2017. Taxing the top 10 percentage in to oblivion is going to mean massive tax rises for the 90%. The average tax wedge has already risen from 30.9% in 2020 to 34.6% in 2021. The whole tax system needs to be reformed as we’re already seeing the 90% of earners being forced in to higher tax.

An extremely engaging conversation, very well presented by two gentlemen who clearly have a grasp of the tax system. Have they put there ideas to the incoming government? You have men gentlemen as a new subscriber, thank you.

Until we have a transparent system our economy will never thrive. I am getting old, I can still remember Lady Docker flaunting her gold- plated Rolls Royce. This has been going on since the early 1950s. None of this would be reinvested in industry, instead swept off to off-shore tax havens. Grossly unfair to employees who generated this wealth.

@buzzukfiftythree

7 ай бұрын

You forgot to mention her private yacht. It’s been going on much further back than the 1950s and much of the wealth that built so many of our 18th and early 19th Century National Trust properties and private stately homes was derived from income from the slave trade (e.g. Capesthorne Hall in Cheshire).

@StarMan_2018

7 ай бұрын

Employees don’t generate wealth. CUSTOMERS do.

Politicians have been using taxpayers as cashcows for decades. Lib/lab/con all help themselves to taxpayers money.

@fredatlas4396

7 ай бұрын

No just the tories giving big tax cuts for big corporate businesses and the wealthy and higher payed since 2010, and at the exact same time slashing funding in real terms adjusted for inflation for all public services to its lowest levels in in well over 40 yrs or more. And screwing the rest of us basic rate tax payers etc

Brilliant. This should be shown to schools, colleges and Universities so that those entering the real world can understand how the tax game is currently played.

@hoonaticbloggs5402

6 ай бұрын

😂 that won’t fit the agenda,will it

A great discussion, but I do disagree with one point. The assertion that council tax should be a fixed % of property value. While it would make sense if higher property value always equaled higher income the two do not hold. Take Burnley for instance average house price there is c.150,000. While average house price in wandsworth c.875,000. A 0.5% tax on both would result in a massive difference. Why should a Nurse in Wandsowrth pay 4x the tax that a nurse in Burnley pays. It only seems fair when thinking about rich bankers and lawyers. A fixed percent would penalise ordinary people who happen to live in a nicer area. This could lead to increased stratification of society as people are forced to leave areas where there income doesn't align with the value of the property in the area. Surely, this would only lead to increased inequality as ordinary people would in effect be priced out of the best areas even where they have he foresight to buy into am area and grow with it. This could further accelerate the pace of gentrification to even more undesirable levels. A fairer system would be to set a central council tax for all people and have it paid out of income. Then potentially add a property tax exclusively for rented properties and 2nd homes. That property tax could then be a fixed % of asset price. This would make more sense as the majority of public services would be paid for collectively but you would have a property tax for individuals who are more likely to actively benefit from their property wealth. Most people who only own one property don't actively benefit from property it is just a positve benefit of living in a paticular area.

The council tax was a poor choice to use. It's a tax to provide a (local) service its not linked to house prices but the but a snap shot value to determine its 'volume' in a local area. If you start charging Landlords they will pass it on to the tenant as rent just as with cleaning fee's and deposits supplemental rent increases. If you want to address council tax then re-banding is where you need to look. Properties that have be extensively extended only get re-classed once they are sold, this means you could be paying two bedroom council rates on a 6 bedroom house. IMO tax avoidance is where they need to start, those top 1% who have the wealth to make it worth while to pay a legion of accountants to legally shift money around to erase any taxation. I don't find money vulgar but dodging all tax on income very much is. I had to do some tax planning (on behalf of someone else) recently I had a team of experienced tax accountants holding my hand and honestly it felt more like something out of Monty python sketch with secret rules and triggers. Really insane space to navigate, impossible without people who know and charge accordingly. If labour were really brave they would commission a complete blank slate tax rethink. Transparent, Simpler, fair, apply to all while not purely to clobber the rich (think that would make the UK unattractive place for business). It shouldn't require a PHD in masons handshakes and a 1st from Hogwarts to do sensible tax planning

As someone with an economics degree and now a retired chartered accountant, I have heard most of Harry's ideas for change before, albeit maybe in a slightly different context and sadly it seems a bit like Groundhog Day. I feel that the nut the Labour government tried to crack in the 1970s by bring in Inheritance Tax (with exemptions for family-run firms and farms) seemed a good way forward, as the rates were higher than under the previous death duties regime. This was watered down when Thatcher came to power and has never been reinstated. One issue is the number of loopholes that our complicated tax system throws up that wealthy people can pay accountants to exploit on their behalf. We also need to work out a better way of stopping people moving wealth overseas (except for genuine investment) and that may mean punitive taxes when the money is repatriated. We also need to have a tax that is more akin to Capital Gains Tax than Stamp Duty when people move house. That needs a bit of fine tuning to avoid innocent people being hammered but successive policies have just resulted in house prices escalating wildly in my lifetime to the point where young people can't expect to own property or get a mortgage until they are middle-aged. I could go on but the more I think about the more I realise that the UK is being governed by people who are pandering to a small proportion of the population and the rest just have to lump it.

Great conversation. I've read a few New Statesman pieces in the past but this video persuaded me to subscribe.

Hope the politicians were listening to that but doubt that they have the guts to act on the ideas

Personally (in case we have something to cut) I would prefer to merge (abolish) the NI (both employee and employer) and income tax at first, as I consider the NI tax as deeply amoral - (1) two taxes - NI and income tax on employment/labor; (2) using PAYE - those 2 taxes are already payed together (they are not separate in actual payment); (3) NI is a cheating tax, as the society should educate people about taxation, rather than hide something under the carpet. After merging, not only the real labor tax becomes explicitly visible and comparable to capital/assets taxes, but it also shows a clear opportunity to cut it. Coming to a council/ property tax, as it is proposed to be based on the property monetary value (i.e. 0.5 %) anyway, I would suggest to think about LVT instead, as I believe it might be more fair.

@allamasadi7970

7 ай бұрын

I think another idea is tax increases on the rich are to be used on things that benefit both the poor and the rich, so spending on infrastructure that is near to where both the wealthy and the poor live, I think it makes sense to get the rich on our side

Here is why I’m against any new taxes despite not being wealthy. It ALWAYS starts off as a tax on the ‘rich’ yet years later ends up as a tax on the average person. Show me one example where this is not the case.

@antonymossop3135

7 ай бұрын

If the "average person" makes substantial income from their invested wealth, then I don't see a problem with that. It's a capital gains tax, it should apply equally. It's just that it shouldn't be taxed less than working for a living. Tax income as income.

@coloaten6682

7 ай бұрын

Nobody is talking about new taxes, it's about changing the rates for existing taxes so that the wealthy pay more. There has been an asset boom over that last few years and much of the wealth has gone to people with assets from people who work.

@paulmessenger9836

7 ай бұрын

Stop your government giving your taxes away to other countries and involving the country in war overseas then talk about increasing taxes

@axelfiraxa

7 ай бұрын

​@antonymossop3135 yes and no. If you have a salary you get that every month that you are employed If you invest anything the upside potential is very variable so you au least need a proper offset in place for when you score a loss.

@FirstSkills

7 ай бұрын

This is such a lame view of capital gains. In an scenario of increased global mobility, it is easy for capital to move out of the country. Capitalists drive this economy. Here I refer to data not some opinion based on emotions. I say CGT should be lowered to attract capital and drive the economy further. People are better off paying taxes in a growing economy. Paying higher tax on a higher income is better than paying lower tax in an economy in shambles

Imagine if local papers covered council spending.

@DrRussell

Ай бұрын

Yep.

As a European living in this country for over a decade I can't get my head around how unequal this country is in the matter of taxes and privileges for wealthy nobility lords... Upper class in general. It's crazy.

@ch0293

7 ай бұрын

Yeah it's like almost a feudal system now

@hidesbehindpseudonym1920

7 ай бұрын

It's been that way since my ancestors lived in Britain. And they came over on a sailing ship.

@zbiku82

7 ай бұрын

@@hidesbehindpseudonym1920 Romans? Vikings or Saxons? 😅

@P.G.Wodelouse

7 ай бұрын

i know its shocking how 10% of adults have never worked and nearly a third of adults earn less than the taxable minimum, meaning nearly half of the adult population don't pay income tax. it is disgusting how these poor people don't pay income tax like the rest of us. oh wait you probably meant it was unequal somehow the other way around.

@richardwyman5975

7 ай бұрын

Wodelouse… taking your comment seriously, I’m afraid we need people who have the balls to get off their arses and take risks, and why shouldn’t an investment (and risk) be taxed at a lower figure. We live in a nanny state and most people expect the state to pay for them, so this encourages ‘why work mentality’ I’ve been self employed all my life and have worked through sweat and worry, and now I’m retired and can’t enjoy my life, but the socialist say tax that capitalist pig, why should he be wealthy while I’ve sat on my arse and done f..k all with my life. We need rich people, if not, go and live in China and all live the same

Absolutely spot on analysis I don't understand why these ideas are not being hammered home by Labour.

@paulmessenger9836

7 ай бұрын

Really have you been listening the past 30 years labour don't care about the working classes

@tomlxyz

7 ай бұрын

The leader of the labor party is just a rich person too with income from capital gains. Not as rich but he certainly benefits from the current system

@hakattak

7 ай бұрын

Look what happened to Corbyn, the public rather have BoJo than any radical shift in tax structure and infrastructure spend. We’re getting what we voted for, not sure why people are moaning.

@paulmessenger9836

7 ай бұрын

Corbyn lol million pound house in London MP pension and wife has a sweat shop in Mexico the your corbyn

@HH-zx2lq

7 ай бұрын

Labour is no different from the Conservative. They are both in the same bed

Me and the Mrs are in that awful 'just in the 40%' tax bracket. It's an absolute aspiration killer, because you've either gotta smash through it and earn a lot more, and or its really not worth bothering with. And that's where we are at. Why take a promotion with more work, stress, etc. We used to invest money but why risk it when if you dare to make a bit they will hammer you for 40% of tax. Why put in some overtime at work to give half of it to the government. Why try and accumulate any wealth to get smashed with a inheritance tax bill?

@stephencharles9054

7 ай бұрын

Imagine having an undergrad and masters student loan on top of that. An extra 15% makes that about 58% tax over 50k. Absolutely insane.

@neildee9834

7 ай бұрын

This problem of stepped level taxation affects aspiration and survival for both personal situations and business . Three times I have grown a small retail business, only to find the vat threshold unconquerable. Suddenly reaching a stage where 12% of your turnover becomes tax ( 20% less any input tax) means that what used to be your earnings just disappears overnight. I agree that additional taxing of assets rather than taxing work seems more sustainable.

@44theastessex

7 ай бұрын

That's not how the UK tax works. You'll only pay 40% on the amount above the threshold, not the total value. You'll still be earning more than someone in the band below you. Saying otherwise is just a lie, and serves the rich's interests.

@GrooveTasticThang

7 ай бұрын

Indeed these young guys would further tax your hard worked for investments and responsibilities taken. You do the simple work / life balance calculations and decide not to improve your positions. That’s the rub, tax the risk takers and responsible and you kill the economic drivers. IMHO

@glowwurm9365

7 ай бұрын

Highly unlikely you’ll ever face an inheritance tax bill, it effects a tiny proportion of estates (anything over £1 million).

Set percentage of council tax across the country would level up the playing field.

The top 10% of earners pay 60% of the total tax take.

My sis pays 60 Euro council tax a year in Belgium. You pay separately for your bins and recycling. The more you pollute the more you pay. Simple

This is exactly the sort of conversation we need to be having. Inequality has damaged the cohesion of this country beyond measure. Continuous growth is a planet wrecking pipe dream.

Your point on basing council tax on property value has 2 key floors: 1: Who decides the property value? The true value of the property is only decided at the point in which it is sold. I think its unfair to be told the estimated value of the property by a third party council, bank, model or otherwise, its open to manipulation and adds unnecessary effort 2: A person on realises the increase in the value of their property at the point of sale. Although you gave examples to suit your point of Burnley paying less and Kensington & Chelsea paying more I Imagine there will be people that can't afford their increased council tax

Where did you get the 0.1% in London figure ? My understanding is that council tax is based on bands, number of occupants and the estimated propery value from April 1991 by VOA. For instance, a 250-500k(current) house in London, if both are in band D with 1 occupant is around £1.3k per year, and the owner has to pay it even if you rent it.

It's time for a Land Value Tax

@kevoreilly6557

7 ай бұрын

Yup. In the US I pay the property tax on both my own and rental properties - same rate

@kayedal-haddad9294

7 ай бұрын

Long overdue: I would replace Business Rates and Council Taxes with a Land Value Tax!

On the plus side we have by far the largest tax free personal allowance in Europe, but the de-linking of allowances and tax bands from inflation when we have 10% p.a. is a serious kick in the teeth....... The german constitution states that the basic cost of living should be tax free, german tax system is no where near achieving that , but would be a good base for the personal allowance in the UK , then would have to be more like 20k/annum with appropriate additonal allowances for other adults and children supported.

@jusw

7 ай бұрын

Agree, but reducing the burden of taxation on regular income needs to be offset by raising that tax revenue somewhere else, which is what Harry Lambert is suggesting could (and morally, should) be increased taxation on capital (wealth).

Summed up perfectly. The rules of the game has been fixed. This was such an interesting take. Enjoyed it thoroughly.

NI is the tax that needs to be cut; not basic rate. It is exclusively focussed on work and labour. It acts as a discouragement to people on the margins of employment. Conversely, there are a lot of well-to-do pensioners, especially those of us on final salary-based, inflation-protected occupational pensions, who could easily afford to pay some National Insurance, and ought to do so since it is we who are the increasing burden on the NHS and the social care systems. Of course we will hear the response "I paid my dues into NI for 40 years and I am now entitled to start drawing from it". A conversation is now needed saying "Maybe that unwritten rule now needs tweaking a little otherwise the NHS may collapse". But perhaps the smart way to achieve the underlying objective might be to cut employees NI by 5% and increase basic rate by 5%. This change would also go some way to solve the IR35 enforcement problem by removing some of the incentive for workers to supply labour through one -person consultancy arrangements.

Having poorer areas pay less council tax and richer areas pay more would just mean that the poor areas would get less local government services, wouldn't it? I lived in the USA and one of the deep deep inequities in the USA is that schools are funded by local property tax. So poor areas have the worst schools and that keeps those areas poor. This would do the same thing but with social care, homelessness prevention, local leisure services, adult education, the arts and music, children's and youth services, etc etc.

@antonymossop3135

7 ай бұрын

The central government in the UK essentially regulates and controls the council budgets and already effectively redistributes the funding. It's a different system from the US (which itself varies at the state level). So it's already being centrally managed, it's really just where you turn the dial...

@markbellamy6965

7 ай бұрын

Also lived in the US. The local nature of property taxes is only one of the major issues with it. It's a tax on what's is most people largest none liquid asset, that they have no control over it's value or ability sell a fraction of the asset to cover the taxes. So what happens is people are priced out of there own homes, because they buy a cheap house, there is a housing boom and they can no longer afford the tax bill. There left with no choice but to sell and relocate to a cheaper area, as they don't have the income to cover the tax. Then there's the issue that taxing someone on the value of there property, requires defining the value of that property. The US local authorities spend insane amounts of money doing this yearly and basically every property owner argues and fight the value. Which is just a massive waste of time and money. It's just a very stupid way to tax people. The UK council tax is much more sensible system and it would be much better to adjust that, add more bands, adjust how properties are assigned to bands, making the band pricing more reflective of the local situation etc etc. Than go to the regressive and flawed US style system.

@themarbleking

7 ай бұрын

The U.S is effectively a third world country. For every billionaire there are thousands of people living on the streets in defacto refugee camps. They are the perfect example of inequality.

@slothsarecool

7 ай бұрын

they’re all going bankrupt anyway 😅 the councils were investing all their money in real estate I guess

Surely if tenants don't have to pay council tax it will just get reflected in their rent instead?

@philipjones3599

7 ай бұрын

In addition properties that in London would overnight lose half their value or more.

The problem I foresee from increasing capital gains taxes is that it would incentivise people to hold onto assets more to avoid those higher CG taxes

Who gets 90% of our taxes. NOT us the people.

Excellent work New Stateman - Come on Labour you can be better than these Tory leaches. Economic justice now!

@pacman7959

7 ай бұрын

Labour voter all my life. Now voting conservative because there is no difference. Might as well give it to the OG.

@mattbrownartwork

7 ай бұрын

@@pacman7959 ✌Tory Troll.

Whilst moving Council Tax away from the tennant and onto the owner sounds like a good idea, there's not really anything to stop a landlord from raising the rent further to 'cover the cost' of that additional fee.

@ralphcoombs3600

7 ай бұрын

He would have to increase it by more, to cover the risk he is now carrying if a tenant fails to pay. So ultimately it costs the good tenant more.

@gigitrix

7 ай бұрын

Of course - this would happen to start with but the purpose is that homeowners pay for houses regardless of occupancy. If you have no tenants nobody is paying that tax today. If instead the landlord is on the hook regardless of if they have a tenant, they have greater incentive to fill the house, which means they have to compete harder for getting a tenant quicker and means there is greater supply, lowering costs overall (and giving local authorities more funding from the revenue raised on empty properties)

...such a helpful, illuminative and timely contribution ! I was aware of many of the structural inequities in our country and this has helped me towards a more comprehensive fiscal understanding. Thank you ! I don't want to be nihilistic but sadly as you guys indicate our political class, leadership (or lack of it) and I would add system, with over 780 mostly very wealthy peers and an ideologically driven doctrinaire, risk averse opposition party (using same gov. talking points eg 'the NHS needs reform' blah blah blah), the status-quo looks pretty 'baked in' and the next election looks unlikely to bring about any significant material change to wealth distribution and real terms repair & investment in our public services ? 🤷‍♂

There’s an underlying premiss that neither host cares to address, whether tax is a fair concept to begin with. They’re happy to talk about who should shoulder the burden, but it’s just an exercise in reallocating someone else’s money (which as they point out equates to someone’s labour) what gives anyone the right to your labour).

The problem is, saying rich people like Sunak who "only" paid less as a percentage, is that he would have paid something like £1m in taxes last year. And the argument seems to be, from people who may have paid £10,000, this isn't enough. How is this a fair argument? Because the other thing is, if you tax rich people too much, they just move away to a new tax domicile, and that's the end of that. Instead of getting the £1m from Sunak, you get nothing. And what's worse, is that the hole left by that, will then have to be made up by whoever is left. You fundamentally need to encourage entrepreneurship, and aspiration. Allow people to actually keep the majority of what they make, otherwise they'll just go somewhere else and make their money there, and pay less taxes wherever else they choose to go. This discussion (as much of it as I could stomach, anyway) doesn't pay any attention to the fact that the world exists outside the UK's borders, and that people can move to another country easily, particularly if they are wealthy. This would seem to be a very, very, simplistic argument.

This guy is absolutely brilliant, get him on more

Agree completely (British system it's higly unfair protects a little favoured wealthy group - that was one of the main reason that they wanteds to get out of EU - not concern for their own people/citizens).

Stopped listening when he said the landlord should pay the council tax for the tenant 🤦‍♂️