ប្រវត្តិសាស្ត្រពិតនៃក្រុងអយុធ្យា, The true history of Ayutthaya, ประวัติศาสตร์ที่แท้จริงของอยุธยา,
#ពីនេះពីនោះHD
ឆាណែលនេះបង្កើតឡើយសម្រាប់ចែករំលែកចំណេះដឹងគ្រប់បែបបទ*-*អគុណសម្រាប់ការគាំទ្រឆាណែលយើងខ្ញុំ
សូមបញ្ជាក់ផងដែរថាយើងខ្ញុំមិនមាននិន្នាការបក្សនយោបាយខាងណានោះឡើយ
សូមជម្រាបទុកជាដំណឹង*
--សូមអគុណ--
*Subscribe*
/ @pinispinushd
---------------------------------------
* daily broadcast *
all things, everything, everything, everything
Do not forget to support our channel by pressing SUBSCRIBE ...
/ @pinispinushd
------------------------------
Thanks!!!!!!
--keyword for search---
ប្រវត្តិសាស្ត្រពិតនៃក្រុងអយុធ្យា,
The true history of #Ayutthaya
Dr. #VongSotheara
ประวัติศาสตร์ที่แท้จริงของอยุธยา,
Пікірлер: 200
ខ្ញុំស្តាយស្រណោះទឹកដីកម្ពុជាណាស់
@user-pp2hn8sf8h
5 ай бұрын
เสียใจ 🦶 อะไรล่ะ เขมรโง่ พวกมึงเป็นทาส แตงหวานมันเป็นกบฏ ก่อกบฏฆ่า กษัตริย์ขอม เพราะตอนนั้นทาสที่เป็นบรรพบุรุษของชาวกัมพูชา มีจำนวนอัตราส่วนมากกว่า ขอมที่เป็นชนชาติชั้นเจ้านาย ทำให้เกิดการต่อต้านจากพวก ทาสชาวเขมร จึงก็กบฏ ฆ่าเจ้านาย และ กษัตริย์
ដាក់ភ្លេងមក អាណិតប្រជាជនខ្មែរណាស់
លោកគ្រូ វង្ស សុធារ៉ា ខ្ញុំមានសំណាងណាស់ដែលបានរៀនជាមួយលោកគ្រូ
@harrisonphin1235
4 жыл бұрын
Yuth Saing ខ្ញុំអត់បានរៀនជាមួយលោកគ្រូវង្សសុធារ៉ាផង
@billfahchannel934
Ай бұрын
DNAเขมร ไม่เหมือนมอญโบราณ สยาม เขมรไม่มีDNAมอญโบราณ เขมรมีDNAเหมือนชาวแอฟริกาผสมอินโดนีเซีย ไม่ใช่คนดั้งเดิมบนแผ่นดินนี้
ខ្ញុំមើលហើយសោកស្ដាយណាស់
โหยหาอดีต สอนลูกหลานให้โทษแต่คนอื่น ไม่โทษบรรพบุรุษของตัวเองที่อ่อนแอที่ไม่สามัคคีกันไม่สามารถรักษาคุ้มครองประเทศ ไม่โทษพ่อแม่พี่น้องที่ยอมให้พอลพตฆ่าคนเขมรด้วยกันทำไมไม่เป็นน้ำหนึ่งใจเดียวกัน คุณเศร้าๆแล้วก็โทษๆ และก็โทษอยู่ร่ำไป
ស្តាយទឹកដីខ្មែរណាស់ មិនគួរសោះ
@houthkeal5848
2 ай бұрын
មកពីស្តេចខ្មែរជំនាន់មុនទតឃើញក្រពេីនៅលេីគោក ជិតដាច់ខ្យល់ ហើយមានព្រះទ័យអាណិតក៏ជួយយកអាសាសត្វក្រពើ បង្រៀនក្រពើឲ្យចេះហែលទឹក ដល់ពេលក្រពេីធំធាត់ ត្រូវទឹក រីកស្រកា វាបែរមកខាំក្បាលខ្មែរវិញ អញ្ចឹងហើយខ្មែរយើងជំនាន់នេះសូមកុំសូវចូលចិត្តចិញ្ចឹមក្រពើពេក
@billfahchannel934
Ай бұрын
DNAเขมร ไม่เหมือนมอญโบราณ สยาม เขมรไม่มีDNAมอญโบราณ เขมรมีDNAเหมือนชาวแอฟริกาผสมอินโดนีเซีย ไม่ใช่คนดั้งเดิมบนแผ่นดินนี้
គារដឹកនាំប្រទេសគ្មានកំហុសណាធ្ងន់ ជាងការដឹកនាំឱ្យប្រជាជនល្ងង់ខ្លៅទេ
បុព្វបុរសខ្មែរយើងជាវីរ:បុរសដ៏អស្ចារ្យ
@billfahchannel934
Ай бұрын
DNAเขมร ไม่เหมือนมอญโบราณ สยาม เขมรไม่มีDNAมอญโบราณ เขมรมีDNAเหมือนชาวแอฟริกาผสมอินโดนีเซีย ไม่ใช่คนดั้งเดิมบนแผ่นดินนี้
Accurate answer beloved teacher the word Ayut meaning warrior or battle something like that in Khmers language . 🙏🙏🇰🇭🇰🇭🇰🇭🇰🇭🇰🇭❤️❤️❤️❤️😓😓
នេះពិតជាប្រាសាទខ្មែរព្រោះសៀមហៅថៃវាជាចោរកូនខ្មែរគ្រប់រូបត្រូវចងចាំប្រវត្តិសាស្រ្តយើងឲ្យបានច្បាស់ព្រោះទឹកដីសៀមនឹងយួនវាគាបយកជិតអស់ហើយ
@satharauv5555
5 жыл бұрын
ខែ្មរចេះរួមគ្នាអាច ខែ្មរនៅបរទេសមានសមតិភាព អាច!
@mukmuksurin7370
Жыл бұрын
ไม่ได้มีเเค่เผ่าพันธุ์เขมร กลั่มเดียวนะในเขตนี้55
@sirapataroon9085
Жыл бұрын
เขาพระวิหารที่แย่งไปตอนนี้เป็นไงบ้าง เขมรแย่งไปแล้วเอาไปยริหารจนเจ๊งไม่มีนักท่องเที่ยว ปราสาททรุดโทรม ไม่มีการบูรณะรักษา ใดๆ
រួមគ្នាដើម្បីការពារជាតិយើង
@mukmuksurin7370
Жыл бұрын
สร้างเอานะ จะเป็นรูปธรรม
@billfahchannel934
Ай бұрын
DNAเขมร ไม่เหมือนมอญโบราณ สยาม เขมรไม่มีDNAมอญโบราณ เขมรมีDNAเหมือนชาวแอฟริกาผสมอินโดนีเซีย ไม่ใช่คนดั้งเดิมบนแผ่นดินนี้
ត្រូវ
ស្តាប់ប្រវត្តខ្មែរ
ស្រណោះណាស់
ខ្មែរយើង.....
@billfahchannel934
Ай бұрын
DNAเขมร ไม่เหมือนมอญโบราณ สยาม เขมรไม่มีDNAมอญโบราณ เขมรมีDNAเหมือนชาวแอฟริกาผสมอินโดนีเซีย ไม่ใช่คนดั้งเดิมบนแผ่นดินนี้
This is the truth of history
@billfahchannel934
Ай бұрын
DNAเขมร ไม่เหมือนมอญโบราณ สยาม เขมรไม่มีDNAมอญโบราณ เขมรมีDNAเหมือนชาวแอฟริกาผสมอินโดนีเซีย ไม่ใช่คนดั้งเดิมบนแผ่นดินนี้
👍👍👍
The most beautiful Thai and Siamese architecture The throne hall was built by the kings of Ayutthaya. The architecture is different from Khmer.
@brossmos959
Жыл бұрын
It had developed step by step until now
@ggsting8708
Жыл бұрын
In addition to architecture The evolution of the art of creating Buddha images not khmer art...
@DevarajaGodKing
11 ай бұрын
Who's the kings of Ayutthaya and what year? Where do Thais originate from and what year? Why does Thai lie to the young generations? The thieves are always lying.
@liketostudy66
11 ай бұрын
before arrived of tai people. Ayuthaya get influence by Mon and Khmer.
@__-is9ug
7 ай бұрын
@@DevarajaGodKing DONT FORGET WHO DESTROY ANGKOR😂😂😂
ខ្ញុំសាកស្នើសុំទៅ ក្រសួងវប្បធម៌និងវិចិត្រសិល្បៈម្តងតែអត់ស្គាល់ផេកគាត់
Empire Khmer very wonderful ! lovely
@billfahchannel934
Ай бұрын
DNAเขมร ไม่เหมือนมอญโบราณ สยาม เขมรไม่มีDNAมอญโบราณ เขมรมีDNAเหมือนชาวแอฟริกาผสมอินโดนีเซีย ไม่ใช่คนดั้งเดิมบนแผ่นดินนี้
@billfahchannel934
Ай бұрын
DNAเขมร ไม่เหมือนมอญโบราณ สยาม เขมรไม่มีDNAมอญโบราณ เขมรมีDNAเหมือนชาวแอฟริกาผสมอินโดนีเซีย ไม่ใช่คนดั้งเดิมบนแผ่นดินนี้
ខ្ញុំឥឡូវកំពុងទស្សនានៅក្រុងអយុធ្យា មានគ្រោងខ្លះនៅប្រាសាទមានប្រេីថ្មបាយក្រៀមដូចនៅអង្គរដែរ ហេីយគ្រោងផ្សេងទៀត ប្រេីដុំអិតតូចៗទាំងអស់ ដូចក្នុងវិដេអូចឹង ហេីយតួប្រាសាទខ្លះផ្អៀងចង់ដួលទៀត។
@khmerangkorsiemreap2730
4 жыл бұрын
សំណាងហើយបានទោដល់ទឹកដីខ្មែរ ថតអោយបានច្រើន បង្ហាញថល់ខ្មែរ ទឹកដីដ៏កំសត់អឺយធ្លាលើដៃគេ
ស្ដាយណាស់ទឹកដីខ្មែរ
@mukmuksurin7370
Жыл бұрын
สร้างใหม่สิจะภาพภูมิใจ ตามยุคสมัย
Ramayana ayudhya
ចំពោះទំានាក់ទំនងផ្នែកសិល្បះនឹងជិវភាពរស់នៅរបស់ខ្មែរនឹងភូមាមានភាពប្រហាក់ប្រហែលគ្នា អាស្រ័យទៅតាមតំបន់ !..យើងបានឃើញការស្លៀកពាក់របស់ស្រីភូមាក៏ស្រដៀងបែបខ្មែរ ឬ ផ្ធះសម្បែង _ជង្រុក នៅ តំបន់មឿង យ៉ាង ឬ មឿងយ៉ង ដូចគ្នានឹងផ្ទះបុរាណរបស់ខ្មែរបេះបិទ ,ម្យ៉ាងបទចម្រៀង នឹងរបៀបរាំវង់ នៅមឿងយ៉ាងនេះក័ដូចគ្នានឹងបែបបទរាំវង់របស់ខ្មែរសុទ្ទសាធផងដែរ ...(លោកអ្នកអាចរកមើលនៅ You tube បាន ! )
@satharauv5555
5 жыл бұрын
ជនជាតិការេ៉ន ជាជនជាតិខែ្មរ នៅភូមា ពេលដែលបានបាត់បង់ជំនាន់សៀមយកបានសុខោទ័យ ការ៉េននិយាយភាសាខែ្មរ។
ខ្ញុំ ស្តាយទឹកដីខ្មែរយើងណាស់😢😢😢😢
@user-zp5sw2yb2y
Жыл бұрын
คุณเกิดที่อยุธยาหรือป่าว
@mukmuksurin7370
Жыл бұрын
สร้างเอาสิใครห้าม
😭😭😭
បេីគេយកទៅថែបានល្អជាងយេីងក៏គ្រាន់បេីដែលនៅយេីងតែគ្មានការថែរក្សាដែល បេីទៅមិនទៅថៃក៏ទៅប្រទេសផ្សេង
អោយតែពេលស្ដាប់ពីប្រវិត្តម្ដងៗឈឺចាប់
King Taeng Wan why he had to kill the Varman dynasty, we have to argue nowadays, otherwise the great Khmer Empire would remain on the world map today. You know, I'm very sad. Since the 14th century, we have had nothing else to stand out to the world.
@mukmuksurin7370
Жыл бұрын
สร้างใหม่เถอะ ตามยุคสมัยใหม่จบ
@greenboygamer907
5 күн бұрын
Whose king taeng wan right now😒 is this another thai conspiracy
ចង់ឲ្យវីឌីអូនេះសរសេរជាអក្សរអង់គ្លេសបកស្រាយពីការរាយរាប់នេះ
ខ្មែរកាត់ដីអោយគេរហូត
ជារបស់ខ្មែរ
@mukmuksurin7370
Жыл бұрын
ใครสร้าง
សាលារៀនគេបង្រៀនប្រវត្តសាស្រ្តក្មែរពីបីម៉ាត់ហើយអាពីបីម៉ាត់នឹងក្លែងក្លាយទៀតអភព័ណាស់។
@billfahchannel934
Ай бұрын
DNAเขมร ไม่เหมือนมอญโบราณ สยาม เขมรไม่มีDNAมอญโบราณ เขมรมีDNAเหมือนชาวแอฟริกาผสมอินโดนีเซีย ไม่ใช่คนดั้งเดิมบนแผ่นดินนี้
ជាតិសាសន៍តែមួយគ្រាន់តែបំបែកប្រទេសនិងដូរភាសារ
@user-cq1zu2dz2t
4 жыл бұрын
អាចម៍ ចះុហែងមិនថាពិភពលោកជាជាតិសាសន៍តែមួយហេីយគ្រាន់តែដូរភាសាទៅ
@Ngim905
4 жыл бұрын
@Chhin C ពូជសៀមពូជផ្សេង ខ្មែរពូជផ្សេង
@sommatchu3856
Жыл бұрын
ยุคจารีตและยุคศักดินาจะมารวมว่าประเทศไม่ได้ มันแค่อาณาจักรผู้ปกครอง...คำว่าประเทศหรือว่ารัฐชาติมันเกิดเมื่อเรามีการทำแผนที่ที่แน่นอน....ไม่มีการขยายอาณาเขตเมื่อมี สหประชาชาติ รัฐชาติได้เกิดสมบูรณ์แล้ว..
@sommatchu3856
Жыл бұрын
ยุคจารีตและยุคศักดินาจะมารวมว่าประเทศไม่ได้ มันแค่อาณาจักรผู้ปกครอง...คำว่าประเทศหรือว่ารัฐชาติมันเกิดเมื่อเรามีการทำแผนที่ที่แน่นอน....ไม่มีการขยายอาณาเขตเมื่อมี สหประชาชาติ
😞😞😞😓😓😓😢😢😢😭😭😭
😐😔😔😭😭😢
จักรวรรดิโรม...ไม่ได้กลับมาฉันใด (หลายประเทศ) จักรวรรดิขอมไม่ได้กลับมาฉันนั้น...(หลายประเทศ) ประวัติศาสร์มันแค่บอกที่มาของสิ่งนั้น...มันไม่ได้บอกความเป็นเจ้าของในสิ่งนั้น....... ขอมแท้ไม่มีอยู่จริง....ทุกคนเป็นเลือดผสม.....
@TM-hd5iv
Жыл бұрын
Keep coping.
@sommatchu3856
Жыл бұрын
There's nothing to deal with anymore...it's true that Cambodia is the successor of King Taengwaan...so where do I put him...the kingdom is divided...it's the Chaturamuk era. ......Long Waek Era....Udong Era...Phnom Penh Era....It's true...Culture is divided by area..It's Chao Phraya Basin culture belongs to Thailand... The lake and chaturamuk cultures belong to Cambodia.
@greenboygamer907
5 күн бұрын
@@sommatchu3856whose the king u mention probably a cucumber king😒
do.khmer.cambodia 😔😔😔😔
@asdasx8104
5 жыл бұрын
តាមពិតរាជវង្សខ្មែរភាកលិចបំបែកខ្លួនច៌េញពិរាជវង្សខ្មែរនោះឯងព្រោះថាខ្មែរភាកលិចនិយាយភាសាអន្តើនមិនអាចកាច់តុងតាមខ្មែរកណ្តាលបាន
@supremekhmer6596
5 жыл бұрын
Khmer Imperium
wow cambodia😱😱😘
@mukmuksurin7370
Жыл бұрын
ใครสร้าง
ឆ្ងល់ដែរហើយចុះផ្នូរធីតាយ៉រព្រះក្លិននៅឯណា
It real All Khmer known
K-h-o-m is NOT Khmer อยากบอกคนไทยทุกคนว่า คำว่า ข-อ-ม ในภาษาไทย ...พอเอาไปแปลในกูเกิ้ลทรานสเลท มันจะแปลเป็นคำว่า ខ្មែរ (Khmer) ทันที ... เลยมีคนเขมรที่แปลอะไรก็ตามมาจากอินเตอร์เนท อะไรก็ตามที่มีคำว่า ข-อ-ม จะถูกแปลว่าเป็นเขมรในภาษาของเขา ... ดังนั้น ไม่ว่าคนไทยจะพยายามอธิบาย คำว่า ข-อ-ม แบบไหนก็ตาม เช่น "ปราสาทเป็นอารยธรรมข-อ-ม" หรือ "ข-อ-ม เป็นคนสร้างปราสาท" พอเขาใช้กูเกิ้ลทรานสเลทแปลเป็นภาษาของเขมร มันจะถูกแปลว่า "ปราสาทเป็นอารยธรรมเขมร" หรือ "เขมร เป็นคนสร้างปราสาท" ทันทีครับ ... ไม่ว่าจะทำคลิป หรือ อะไรก็แล้วแต่ ถ้าไม่มีขีดคร่อม คำว่า ข-อ-ม กูเกิ้ลก็จะแปลผิดๆ เป็นเขมรทันที ... มันเลยเกิดการโต้เถียงจากกลุ่มคนที่ใช้วิธีแปลประวัติศาสตร์ในอินเตอร์เนท แปลมันทุกอย่างว่า ข-อ-ม เป็นของเขมร ... โต้เถียงกับเขาไปก็เท่านั้น เพราะ เขาก็จะเข้าใจว่า วิกิ ยังบอกว่าเป็นของเขมรเลย บลาๆๆๆ
@liketostudy66
11 ай бұрын
You are stupid. people live in Chenla called themselves as Khmer since 7 century. javanese called Angkorian as khmer too because javanese inscription mention word "Khmr" mean "Khmer". no khmer inscription mention about Khom. but the the word "Khom" was mention by Burmes king. because before tai people was arrived khmer empire. land of thailand and loas are part of khmer empire so khmer stay southern of burmes people or stay bellows of burmes. Because it is usually said that the south is the lower. southern= bellow=khom=kroum.
ជារបស់ថៃហើយ គួរឲសោកស្តាយណាស់ តែសិលាចារឹកជាអក្សរខ្មែរទាំងអស់ ទាំងពីរចនាបទខ្មែរ
@sommatchu3856
Жыл бұрын
มันเป็นภาษาราชการในสมัยนั้น...แล้วก็ไม่ใช้อีก..เมื่อนายกลายเป็นบ่าวหรือขี้ข้า.....บ่าวหรือขี้ข้ากลายเป็นนาย.....มันเป็นอย่างนี้มายาวนานจนปัจจุบัน....
មើលហើយឈឺចិត្តណាស់រឹតតែមើលរឹតតែខឹងស្តាយណាស់
@siamwatchdog
Жыл бұрын
គួរតែខឹងប៉ុលពត
@mukmuksurin7370
Жыл бұрын
พม่าเผาราบนะ คุณต้องสร้างใหม่จะดีที่สุด ของเก่าใช้อะไรได้ งง
🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏😘😘😘😘💂💂
🇰🇭🇰🇭🇰🇭🇰🇭💪💪💪💪💪❤️❤️❤️❤️
ថៃវាអត់ចេះខ្មាស់គេទេ
@Ngim905
4 жыл бұрын
@G7XZz KH មែនតើ ឆ្ងល់ពួកអាសៀមយួនហ្នឹងអតចេះខ្មាសគេទេ រឿងប្រវត្តិសាស្ត្រគេដឹងពេញសាកលលោកនៅវាបំភ្លៃ ។
Roueng ors nong vea pakpon EU-US-Barang...Jea jun dar dak R nakomniyum...dar plun yoge dey drop sambat kay...Yoge mog tver pos kloun. Ber te Thai kloun aign...Kmean samatta pheap aina...mog preap noueng Khmer banh te...Thai banh prateas thom2...ors nong te dell bonkrab Khmer banh. Eylov mean kyum Jayvonavann11...Vai tumlack Thai-EU-US-Barang-Yuon...darmbey ouy jun ors nong mog kators tam jbab tolaka Antarak jeat..douy men lurg leng ouy banh! VIP
The old day Thai don t have a country. Thai country is belong to Cambodia...half to Cambodia n half belong to Loa...
@sommatchu3856
Жыл бұрын
ตื่นเถิดชาวกัมพูชา....ปัจจุบันมันบ่งบอกอดีต.....ว่ามีที่มาอย่างไร...
@mukmuksurin7370
Жыл бұрын
คิดว่าเเถบนี้มีเผ่าพันธุ์คนเขมรเเค่กลุ่มเดียวรึงัย งง
@mukmuksurin7370
Жыл бұрын
@@sommatchu3856 ทำทีมีให้ดีเถอะ อย่าเกินกำลัง มันผิดธรรมชาติ ไปยากนะจบ
U need my country?
There are many misconceptions regarding the early history of Ayuthhaya. The commonly believed theory is that Ayutthaya rose to power as a Thai kingdom, conquered Angkor Wat, captured thousands of Cambodians, and therefore received an influx of Cambodian culture, which cultural elements has continued to be in use to this day. I'm here to shed some light on the matter, and show that early Ayutthaya can be seen as part of 'Greater Angkor'. Cambodia in the 14th and 15th century There is a gap in Cambodian's history from 1327 up to 1431. The last inscription dates from 1327, which mentions the succession of the last king with the Varman-suffix: Jayavarman (IX) Paramesvera. Unlike his three predecessors, the last king was a devout Hindu, while the three former kings were Buddhists. After his reign, the construction of Sanskrit and Old Khmer inscriptions just stopped, and never returned to Cambodia ever again. The first inscription that does appear in Angkor in the 16th century, is written in Middle Khmer, a new form of Khmer that is immensely different from Old Khmer, containing titles that originated in Ayutthaya, with new titles that clearly never were used in Angkor before. The first reliable evidence of Cambodia in the 15th century comes from the Royal Chronicle of Ayutthaya, Leuang Prasoet (LP) version. It tells the story of how an Ayutthayan king (Khmer ethnicity) by the name 'bra rām cau' was exiled to Phnom Penh in 1431, when another Ayutthayan king (Khmer ethnicity) named 'paramarājādhirāj' conquered Angkor. He let his son 'bra nakhon in' to rule in Angkor. The son of bra rām cau, named Yat, married into a Pearic (ethnicity) tribe, and raised armies among the hill tribes of Cambodia, and succeeded to reconquer Angkor from the former Ayutthayan king's son. Predecessor state of Ayutthaya Before Ayutthaya was officially founded in 1351 as a hinterland power, there was a maritime (unidentified) power, a collection of ports, from which Ayutthaya arose. This polity was located in the lower Menam basin, and was named Syem by the Cambodians, and Hsien/Xian by the Chinese/Mongolians. It is evident from the Khmer titles of the rulers of Hsien, that they continued old Khmer traditions. Only from the 15th century up (but possibly already in the 14th century) do we see a gradual Thai influence from the north (Sukhotai), when Hsien became the name for Ayutthaya. The ruling families of Ayutthaya were Khmer until the 16th century. According to Zou Daguan, a Chinese official who wrote a detailed description of Angkor at the end of the 13th century, Hsien had laid the Cambodian land to waste after some devastating wars with Angkor. Peculiarly, there is no mention of this warfare in any sources outside of Cambodia. The most logical explanation is that the war between Hsien and Angkor was seen as an internal conflict. There was no new influx of Cambodian culture The commonly accepted theory is that Ayutthaya as a Thai state, conquered Angkor, and took off with thousands of Cambodian prisoners, which account for the Cambodian influence in Ayutthaya. This is not true. Based on the Old Khmer language used in current day Thailand from the 14th century up, it's evident that the language is a continuation of Angkorean language brought there already centuries before. Also, the titles used by the rulers in current day Thailand, show that they had their own distinguished traditions, which must have been developed locally, without the direct influence from Angkor in those times. There was certainly a cultural exchange between the two states, but the cultural influence was primarily accounted for from Ayutthaya to Angkor, not the other way around. This is shown by the titles used by the Cambodians, which clearly show that they were adopted from Ayutthaya. This is one hand not surprising, since the kings of Cambodia/Angkor in the 15th century were of Ayutthayan origin. On the other hand it is surprising, since it shows that Cambodians lost knowledge of old Angkorean traditions, and had to look eastward to incorporate new cultural elements that were lost. Conclusion Those elements of Thai culture which are generally considered to have originated in India, such as Buddhism, architecture, artistic designs, and even a significant portion of the Thai lexicon, did not enter Thailand directly from India. Rather, they were all second-hand transmissions, so to speak, having first passed through the Sri Lankans (including the Tamil), the Mon, or the Khmer. Even the concept of divine kingship (devaraja) and much of the special vocabulary associated with the royal court were, as M.R. Kukrit Pramoj, a noted intellectual and former Thai prime minister, said, “derived from Cambodia.” As Professor David Wyatt of Cornell University once noted, in fact, “Ayutthaya is the successor of Angkor.”
@vicokhang7178
Жыл бұрын
Wdf how do you know this stuff
@kid9x9
Жыл бұрын
This is good information that logically explains how… Why is Thai culture richer than Cambodia today?
@hitdice9447
Жыл бұрын
Ayutthaya is a wannabe try harder 😂
Thailand
@mrnithjr1183
5 жыл бұрын
Apisit Inrsi ta hg
@tolpisal7686
4 жыл бұрын
It was built by khmer
@user-cq1zu2dz2t
4 жыл бұрын
អាថេាកថៃ
LOL kmher is kmher ever ever eever hello chinbodia
@sambobczin1769
2 жыл бұрын
Hello thiefland accept the history and stop changing the history thief is thief LOL
Reported Khmer logic
បើស្ដាប់តាមអ្នកប្រាជ្ញប្រវត្តិសាស្ត្របស្ចិមប្រទេសនិងថៃដែលនិយាយមិនលម្អៀង គេថារដ្ឋសៀមដំបូងគឺអយុធ្យា មិនមែនសុខោទ័យទេ ពីព្រោះសុខោទ័យមិនគ្រប់លក្ខណៈដែលអាចហៅថាជារដ្ឋបានទេ។ ម្យ៉ាងទៀត សុខោទ័យនិងអយុធ្យាមិនមែនជានគរតែមួយឬជាអ្នកស្នងដំណែងគ្នាទេ ពីព្រោះសៀមសម័យនោះមិនមានការរួបរួមជាស្ថាប័នតែមួយទេ គឺពួកគេងើបឡើងបះបោរនឹងអង្គរដោយឯករាជ្យពីគ្នា។ ក៏ប៉ុន្តែជនជាតិថៃភាគច្រើនដែលមិនមែនជាអ្នកប្រវត្តិសាស្ត្រតែងតែគិតថាសុខោទ័យជារដ្ឋដំបូង បន្ទាប់មកអយុធ្យាជាអ្នកស្នងដំណែង ពីព្រោះអ្នកសៀមដែលផ្សព្វផ្សាយទស្សនៈនេះដំបូងចង់បានប្រវត្តិសាស្ត្រវែងឆ្ងាយ។ មានថៃមួយចំនួនខំភ្ជាប់ខ្លួនឯងទៅនឹងនគរទ្វារវត្តីនិងរាជវង្សអង្គរថែមទៀត ពីព្រោះគេចង់មានប្រវត្តិយូរអង្វែងនិងរុងរឿង។
@sommatchu3856
Жыл бұрын
ไปศึกษายุคพระเจ้าแตงหวานสินั้นมันน่าเป็นต้นกำเนิดกัมพูชา...ที่เป็นปัจจุบัน
@sommatchu3856
Жыл бұрын
กัมพูชาเข้าสู่ยุคมืดทางประวัติศาสตร์
@sommatchu3856
Жыл бұрын
ทำไมศิลปะนี้มันไม่มีในพื้นที่ปัจจุบันของกัมพูชาเลย....คิดสิคิด
@sommatchu3856
Жыл бұрын
กัมพูชาขาดอัตลักษณ์...เอาแต่โทษคนอื่นๆๆ
@Sahaysksik
Жыл бұрын
คุณเข้าใจได้ดีนะ ชาวสยาม ชาวเขมร ชาวมอญ ชาวลาว ล้านนา อยู่ดินแดนนี้มานานแล้ว
In DC B B izn in
របស់អញ🔥🤬
ពូជសៀមពូជចោរ
@aaaHappy
Жыл бұрын
เขมรซิโจร 🤮
ประเทศกูรวยที่สุดเว้ยประเทศจนๆอยางมึงไม่มีศิดมาพูดถึงประเทศกู# จากไทย
@iamqueen3739
5 жыл бұрын
@@duongvoun988เรียกคนอื่นโจรไม่รู้สึกเข้าประเทศตัวเองเหรอ555 ขอทานแบบพวกมึงได้แต่ขอเคลมเขาไปทั่วอัปสราในนครวัดมึงร้องให้ตายละปานี้ลูกหลานไม่เห็นค่า พวกกูรวยวัฒนธรรมค่ะไอทาส วัฒนธรรมกูมีหลักฐานชัดเจนไม่ใช่เป็นทาสสยาม400ปีแบบพวกมึงดูแบบจากไทยทุกอย่าง วัฒนธรรมมึงมีบันทึกไหมสมัยไหนเอามายืนยันไม่ใช่พวกมึงคิดเองขึ้นนะ เคลมของเขาไปทั่ว วัฒนธรรมมึงตายไปนานละ เขมรแดงฆ่าคนฉลาดประเทศมึงไปหมดแล้วเหลือแต่คนโง่ๆแบบมึงล้นประเทศ พยายามก็อปต่อไป อย่ามันใจให้มากปราสาทนครวัดมึงไม่มีทุกอย่างขอทานแบบพวกมึงเหรอจะคิดวัฒนธรรม เปิดกูเกิ้ลดูจากไทยทั้งนั้น
@iamqueen3739
5 жыл бұрын
@@duongvoun988 ใครควายกันแน่ค่ะยื่นโขนเห็นไทยยื่นด้วยทำไปฟ้องยูเนสโกว่าก็อปจากตัวเองเป็นใงละหลักฐานไทยเยอะกว่า โขนไทยจัดอยู่ในระดับสหประชาชาติ เขมรจัดอยู่ในกำลังสูญหาย555 ของก็อปเหี้ยอะไรยิ่งใหญ่กว่าออริจินัล โขนวัดเหรอจะสู้โขนวัง เคลมอะไรหาหลักฐานเยอะชาวโลกเขาไม่ได้โง่แบบพวกมึง ไอทาส ไอขอทาน ไอเมียงประ555
@iamqueen3739
5 жыл бұрын
@@duongvoun988 สะใจค่ะไอขอทาน
@iamqueen3739
5 жыл бұрын
@@duongvoun988 ถ้าพวกกูขโมยวัฒนธรรมมึงมาอยุธยามีอัปสราพวกมึงสักตัวไหม?ไอโง่
@duongvoun988
5 жыл бұрын
🐃🐃🐃🐃🐃🐃🐃🐃🐃🐃🐃🐃🐃🐃🐃🐃🐃🐃🐃🐃🐃🐃🐃🐃🐃
It's true. Who or what was Thai culture before Angkor reigned most of Southeast Asia? They were Southern Tai Chinese invaders from Xishuangbanna. How could they have an initial Hindu/Indianized influence if it wasn't for Angkor? They honestly have so much respect to pay to the Khmers... Thai's can mistaken it was "claiming", but it's simply about revealing true history.
@sommatchu3856
Жыл бұрын
ចក្រភពរ៉ូមមិនវិលវិញទេ អាណាចក្រខ្មែរមិនត្រឡប់មកវិញទេ នេះជាឆ្នាំ២០២២ ហើយនៅតែបង្ហាញថាមានផ្នត់គំនិតដែលមិនបានសិក្សា។ ប្រវត្តិសាស្រ្តប្រាប់ប្រភព វាមិននិយាយអំពីភាពជាម្ចាស់នៃវត្ថុនោះទេ។ គាត់មិនទាមទារសិទ្ធិនៅក្រៅទឹកដីខ្លួនទេ។ សៀមជាផ្នែកមួយនៃអាណាចក្រខ្មែរ វាជាការទទួលយកថាសៀមមានដោយការឆ្លាក់ឈ្មោះសៀមនៅលើជញ្ជាំងប្រាសាទអង្គរវត្ត ក្រោយមកសៀមនឹងក្លាយជាអាណាចក្រអយុធ្យា..ខ្មែរត្រូវបានបន្តពូជពីព្រះបាទតាំងវ៉ាន.....រហូតដល់ទ្រង់ប្រសូត។ នៅកម្ពុជាសព្វថ្ងៃ
@sommatchu3856
Жыл бұрын
There's nothing to deal with anymore...it's true that Cambodia is the successor of King Taengwaan...so where do I put him...the kingdom is divided...it's the Chaturamuk era. ......Long Waek Era....Udong Era...Phnom Penh Era....It's true...Culture is divided by area..It's Chao Phraya Basin culture belongs to Thailand... The lake and chaturamuk cultures belong to Cambodia.
@Mapators
Жыл бұрын
North, South, Northeast, Central Thailand has its own history before coming to unite the land as Siam. Not all Siamese come from China.
@liketostudy66
11 ай бұрын
@@sommatchu3856 siam was part of khmer empire. so siam was get influence from khmer. truth still truth never change.
@liketostudy66
11 ай бұрын
@@sommatchu3856 varman and tangwan were both khmer king. because Chenla people was called themselves as khmer since 7 century. they called their land as kampuchtes since 9 century. kapuchtes = kampuchea = cambodia was found since khmer king jayavarman 2 at (802CE). people in funan chanla angkor never called themselves as siam or thai before arrived of tai people . don't try to claim Khmer Varman king. siam or tai or thai Siamese or Thai or Thai separates the Khmer people.
លោកគ្រូ វង្ស សុធារ៉ា ខ្ញុំមានសំណាងណាស់ដែលបានរៀនជាមួយលោកគ្រូ
អ្វីដែរគេយកទៅហើយយើងមិនអាចទាមទារយកមកវិញបានទេអ្វីដែលសំខាន់យើងត្រូវការពារប្រាសាទខ្មែរយើងដែលនៅចូលរួមរក្សាទាំងអស់គ្នាបើប្រជាជនខ្មែរយើងមិនរួមគ្នាការពារទេគ្មានជនជាតិណាមកការពារទេមានតែគេចង់បាន🇰🇭🥰❤ខ្មែរស្រលាញ់ខ្មែរ🇰🇭❤
ទីក្រុងអយុធ្យាត្រូវបានបង្កើតឡើងដោយព្រះមហាក្សត្រខ្មែរតាំងតែពីដើមសម័យអង្គរមកម៉្លេះ
@mukmuksurin7370
Жыл бұрын
มั่ว
@user-ch4pl6gl4e
Жыл бұрын
คนละเผ่าพันธุ์ คนละภาษา ใครเข้มแข็งกว่าคือผู้ชนะ ทั้งในอดีตปัจจุบันและอนาคต
@KambojaKing
Жыл бұрын
@@user-ch4pl6gl4enot necessarily, 2 face cheaters win too until they get caught but not for long. Lord buddha speak about karma 🙏
ស្តាយដីខ្មែរណាស់តើយើងអាចដណ្តើមយកវិញបានអត់ណ៎ដីខ្មែរច្រើនណាស់ដែលបាត់បង់
@kormhouza5332
4 жыл бұрын
អាចបើយើងមានឆន្ទះ
@kormhouza5332
4 жыл бұрын
ឫការសាមគ្គី
@mukmuksurin7370
Жыл бұрын
ทำทีมีอยู่ให้ดีเถอะ ตลกวะความคิด
@mukmuksurin7370
Жыл бұрын
เเถบนี้ไม่ได้มีเผ่าพันธุ์เขมรกลุ่มเดียวนะครับ คนเขมรมีน้อยสรุป