Get unlimited access to Bloomberg.com for *$1.99/month* for the first 3 months: www.bloomberg.com/subscriptions?in_source=KZreadOriginals Watch more of our News Spotlight documentaries👉kzread.info/head/PLqq4LnWs3olXOhUOv4O6r-9OdWTQN83se How This Tiny Country Can Avoid the 'Oil Curse'👉kzread.info/dash/bejne/e45p0suwc5O5YcY.html Singapore, China and a $2 Billion Money Laundering Scandal👉kzread.info/dash/bejne/Z6532sNym7GuccY.html

@trapiconti4001

2 ай бұрын

You showed the Aon center in chicago, not LA

@iamgermane

2 ай бұрын

AND THEY SUE TRUMP FOR OVERVALUING HIS PROPERTY???

@Rays_Bad_Decisions

2 ай бұрын

It would be nice if you talked about how retirement funds are used to back these bad investments while Chinese use fentanyl money to buy new construction

@AMPProf

2 ай бұрын

OMG I HOPE SO FINALLY A RESET

@chrishoff402

2 ай бұрын

This is why I have a theory about that $355 million/$455 million court judgement against Donald Trump in New York. His properties were valued at that amount before Covid and Zoom made the whole downtown financial district obsolete. Now those Trump properties are only worth what the Court says they are, a mere fraction of that $450 million, maybe only 18 million. So lets say the NY court seizes and then sells all the Trump properties for less than $100 million. Trump can take the court judgement to the tax man and claim a massive deduction. He can also appeal the verdict to the supreme court and not only get the judgement overturned, but the supreme court can say he's the victim of lawfare as a form of political harassment and they won't tolerate any further cases being brought against him. So now NY has to make restitution for the amount of $455 million because their judgement has been overturned on property that they sold for less than $100 million, because that's actual market value in 2024. Trump gets to offload worthless property without losing a dime on it's original pre Covid market value and pays less in taxes for it. That's the real Art of The Deal.

Please don’t blame the pandemic. The ridiculousness of commercial real estate and the future of a drop in the need for office space was predicted in exponential organizations years ago.

@CypherJj4457

2 ай бұрын

Years ago🗣️ they ALREADY knew this was gonna happen

@wrightmf

2 ай бұрын

Exactly!

@jimbojimbo6873

2 ай бұрын

But it was literally the pandemic that started this

@Jebbis

2 ай бұрын

@@jimbojimbo6873 no the pandemic was just a black swan event. This has been going on for over a decade.

@williamparrish2436

2 ай бұрын

@@jimbojimbo6873 The pandemic was a once every hundred year occurrence. Almost impossible to predict and it crushed the world's economy. No way to predict that!

They made the risky decision, and now taxpayers are going to have to bail them out again?

@renemartin5729

2 ай бұрын

Of course. They're too big to fail.

@HaiLeQuang

2 ай бұрын

Of course. Printing more money would make us suffer a bit inflation. But if a burst happens, it may lead to chaos

@jeffcampbell2710

2 ай бұрын

We wish. What's coming is far worse. Look at BY, LA, Oakland, Chicago, San Francisco, and numerous other cities.

@sweden_is_gone

2 ай бұрын

Yep. The taxpayer is the ultimate loser. 😂

@brulsmurf

2 ай бұрын

as is tradition

Funny how the billionaires who expect handouts for their bad investments are the same ones who think everyone with student loans should suffer forever

@nisher15

2 ай бұрын

Funny how you vote for the politicians that help them..

@ricardcluter4765

2 ай бұрын

Funny how what leftists call capitalism, is actually socialism, and it's FAILING, as expected and as it always does.

@IsaacKripke

2 ай бұрын

Student loan “relief” is a blatant handout for people enriching themselves. Blue collar workers shouldn’t be footing the bill for the education of the white collar class.

@bobcortez9471

2 ай бұрын

Neither should get handout, that's the solution, not give away money to debtors for their degrees in gender studies

@Usernotfound31231

2 ай бұрын

@@bobcortez9471 I get that you’re triggered but it’s pretty pathetic that you got emotional and made this about your identity politics

Insane how theres simultaneously a giant commercial real estate crisis going on due to oversupply, while at the same time there's an affordable housing crisis due to undersupply. All without doing anything about changing our archaic zoning laws and no real infrastructure projects for urban areas pertaining to mass transporation. San Fran can't build giant apartment towers because Nimby's don't want their views ruined and New York can't fill up their rent controlled apartments because landlords want market rate rental prices for rent controlled units. This country is a disaster.

@HepCatJack

2 ай бұрын

Often the taxes are based on what the city evaluates a property to be worth. So they have to pay taxes as if they were receiving market rate rental while being hampered with the rent control. The only way that landlords can afford rent control is if their taxes are lower and they can afford the maintenance of the property otherwise it's a melting ice cube.

@Westhamsterdam

2 ай бұрын

Office space is very hard to turn into residential.

@HepCatJack

2 ай бұрын

@@Westhamsterdam true, but for those that can do it and end up doing it, it will bring down the available inventory of offices bringing it closer in line with demand.

@Dendarang

2 ай бұрын

Commercial real estate isn't the same as residential, vast majority of these buildings can't be easily or at all converted into housing because they're giant office blocks built to be places of business and aren't necessarily fit to be inhabited on permanent basis.

@lenaely6146

2 ай бұрын

As long as you understand it's a disaster...a man made disaster.

It’s interesting that the media focuses on the health of the economy more than the health of the citizens that make the economy run

@Koba_78

2 ай бұрын

Bingo

@cx24venezuela

2 ай бұрын

Universal health care? Comunism woke agenda

The economy was never fixed in 2008 - the companies and state just made a bunch of new dumb decisions as they didn’t want to fix the issues and instead just kicking the can down the road and now it’s all going to come crashing down. And again, it’ll be the regular guy who’ll have to pay the bill, yet the regular guy has not benefited at all since the financial crisis. It’s completely outrageous.

@butwhytharum

2 ай бұрын

This issue wasn't part of 08. That crash was the plebs debt. This is the 1%'s debt. And if you're in my situation you don't have any debt and are waiting for the crash to capitalize on the greedy who put the cart before the horse.

@wajutiem08

2 ай бұрын

Correct. I have been saying this. But people, especially conservatives, ususlly tell me to just stop drinking that latte, or stop eatin toasted avocado,or living beyond your means, or quit your job and get a better job, or go back to school, etc etc. In otherwords, they say anything to gaslight you to believe that you are the problem rather than the bad economy from 2008.

@annoyingcommentator1582

2 ай бұрын

@@wajutiem08 People who see outside forces as the problem might not be 100% false all the time but they are less likely to make intelligent decisions to change things themselves. I took advantage of the opportunities since 2008 opportunisticly (yes I feel the need to stress that. It's the core of financial sucess, no matter how grand or modest), and feel like I can cheer on an obsolete sector disappearing now. Of course there are young people now who did not have any opportunities yet and will be hid just as hard as young people have been hit in 2008. But it's not the majority. It's not that it is wrong that the problems of 2008 have not been dealt with. It's that the general moron things he can trusts politics with solving the problem for him. What have you done since 2008? How have you prepared for the next crash? And what where you willing to give up for it? There are a bunch of movies about 2008 and they all show to some degree it's not just one part of society that fucked that up. The banks, the government and the "little people" all knowlingly and ruthlessly participated in what was going on and then blamed each other like whiny little bitches. My favourite of the bunch is Margin Call, because of the "Fuck Normal People Speech" kzread.info/dash/bejne/oHZ5yayTlMeYcrQ.htmlsi=SPJKF6SXNnGJfEOV Leverage, CDO, MBS, government housing subsidies and inherents problems with financial regulations have all been throughly discussed as important factors, but the unfathomable hypocracy of the ordinary consumer gets too littel attention in the whole issue. You didn't get anything out of the shit you have to pay for now? Well, I don't know. Maybe not. Maybe you are super special. But that makes you 1 in 10 million or so.

@JudgeCrater22

2 ай бұрын

You can trace the wreckage in the current American economy and the commercial real estate collapse to 1982, when deranged SEC chairman John Shad changed the SEC's policy since 1934 on share buybacks. Shad's new rule 10b-18 stated that share buybacks by corporations were no longer presumed to be market manipulation and therefore illegal. Instead, Rule 10b said corporations had a “safe harbor” to buy back their stocks, which would usually cause their share price to go up. This one rule change put "greenmailers" like Carl Icahn and banksters in charge of Wall Street. "Activist" investors could threaten to take control of companies unless the companies went into debt to buy back their shares to raise their price and ensure the greenmailers made a handsome profit. The companies now had to pay off the loans they took out to buyback their shares. Many times in the 1980s, the companies were unable to meet their new debt load from buying back their shares. Then, bankruptcy. Every goniff with an M.B.A. degree got into the act, calling themselves hedge funds or private equity. This debt death spiral continues to the present.

@draneym2003

2 ай бұрын

But knowing how this ends, when real estate development gets overextended it's perfect free market to bail these guys out. Good luck on getting the same on your mortgage.

I was an underwriter in commercial real estate lending in the years right after the great recession, and I remember being told (without actually being told) to try and approve as many loans as possible because we needed the origination income. The institution wasn't making hardly anything from interest income, because of the historically low interest rates, so there was a real pressure to approve as many loans as possible so we could collect the origination fee. The origination fee is a percentage of the loan amount (ours was 1%), so there was also an incentive to approve larger loans. The current situation doesn't surprise me at all. It was inevitable.

@ahmedzakikhan7639

2 ай бұрын

Interesting. Doesn't it require approval from departments like Risk ?

@dieglhix

2 ай бұрын

​@@ahmedzakikhan7639the risk department operate on stakeholder risk decisions. The risk department never take decisions, only get consulted and evaluate.

@droldsw31

2 ай бұрын

You should be locked up in jail.

@davidcox3076

2 ай бұрын

Can't make anything off the interest, so make it on the volume of loans with the origination fee instead. Pretty slick, until it all falls apart.

@RUHappyATM

2 ай бұрын

@@droldsw31 And that my dear sir is why I don't have any respect for those involved in the financial industry.

When homes and rents across the world rise to unsustainable highs, pricing out generations and people in need, they don't say anything. When the few wealthy landlords of office buildings possibly lose out on their rent money, it's the worst financial crisis since 2008

@churblefurbles

2 ай бұрын

They bring in those with lower standards instead.

@texasclawhammer6578

2 ай бұрын

Exactly. Well said

Just because you can add background music to a video doesn't mean that you should. Think of the viewer trying to focus on what is being said.

@iank.2162

2 ай бұрын

I never understood the point of it. "oh yeah, sound my uncle beating pans or strange violin is what is missing in this video"

@christianschwalbach7561

2 ай бұрын

or you could ignore the noise....

@scrapbrainsinc

2 ай бұрын

But how do I know when to be sad? Or When to be happy? Help me!

@WackadoodleMalarkey

2 ай бұрын

Background music is for making whoopie, not for serious journalism

@jomckeag4482

2 ай бұрын

I came here for the content, stayed for the background music

Housing advocates have been saying for years that our cities are full of empty buildings only have value on paper and their owners are propping up their value with debt. We've been told we were crazy this whole time.

Speculators overspeculated? Oh no, we can't let them fail

@iamgermane

2 ай бұрын

AND THEY SUE TRUMP FOR OVERVALUING HIS PROPERTY???

After the 2008 bail out, I'm partial to letting the banks fail

@davidburnett5049

2 ай бұрын

They wouldnt help us if we needed it. Why should we help them?

@theultimatereductionist7592

2 ай бұрын

Obviously, jameslongstaff!

@JohnClarkW

2 ай бұрын

I am going to ride past the fact that you are late to the party, and instead acknowledge that you showed up at all. The 08 bailout just encouraged other risky investments.

@jimkelly4214

2 ай бұрын

You want to lose your life savings?

@davidburnett5049

2 ай бұрын

@@jimkelly4214 i dont have enebough to worry about

Geez, private equity, banks and commercial real estate companies face huge losses on office buildings and they're insisting that we all 'return to the office'! I wonder why? It has nothing to do with productivity, company culture or clients and everything to do with trying to protect bad investments at artificially low interest rates.

@John-xd9wr

2 ай бұрын

The rent is due for the building regardless if its got workers inside it or not.

@nyc8452

2 ай бұрын

@@John-xd9wr but companies renewing their leases are downsizing their rental needs because they don't need as many seats. Most commercial leases are 3 - 5 years so it was fine during the pandemic, but 3 years later companies have downsized (and continue to downsize) their office needs when their leases are up for renewal. They also have a lot of options now so not only are they downsizing their lease, but they're getting a better price per seat. Lower occupancy and lower prices means less rent, which means a much higher potential of defaulting on loan payments, which means souring investments for banks, hedge funds and private equity.

We need an Amendment banning the government from bailing out failing lenders.

@alinaqirizvi1441

2 ай бұрын

What if the failure would be detrimental to the standard of living of the people of the country

@William0271

2 ай бұрын

@irizvi1441 It's the peoples' fault for agreeing to loans they can't pay back. They can start a loan insurance company.

@Charlie-ly9kp

2 ай бұрын

@@William0271😂😂😂 it’s crazy you think that, genuiney

@William0271

2 ай бұрын

@@Charlie-ly9kp Do you have no concept of reality? Right not loan insurance exists. That's what the federal government is doing, insuring garbage loans with our stolen tax dollars. Privatizing this would take the burden off of tax payers and put it squarely on the people and businesses being reckless.

@arsenal-slr9552

2 ай бұрын

The problem with that is these lenders also buy things like, your mortgage. So if they default on that, your payments go up in smoke.

What is going on is that bankers think that bankers are the most important people in the world --and tall office buildings to house them are therefore the most important structures to build lots and lots of.

@jimbojimbo6873

2 ай бұрын

What are you talking about

@Australiaisupsidedown

2 ай бұрын

I too have autism

0% interest rates are turning out to be disastrous in the long run.

@raquetdude

2 ай бұрын

He said that the governments gave money to people… they didn’t they gave money to the banks… it was never government debt it was always private bank debt

@myday2704

2 ай бұрын

All caused by lockdowns we didn't really need to have!

@MistaTofMaine

2 ай бұрын

Agreed.

@neodym5809

2 ай бұрын

Well, one can argue that the alternative would have been worse. But honestly: property owners losing money does not sound too disastrous to me.

@sokolmihajlovic1391

2 ай бұрын

A surprise? Big daddy of all crisis because of too low interest rates for too long has to popp yet, Japan China is not far behind

This is the real reason all the CEOs are pushing for their employees to return to the office. The CEOs and their wealthy friends and cronies are the same folks who who own all this commercial real estate. The only thing they care about is propping up the values of their commercial real estate holdings, and all the talk about "Productivity," "Creativity" or whatever other BS they're spouting is just smoke and mirrors to distract from what they really care about, which is protecting the value of their investments. The pandemic proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that workers spending unpaid time sitting in cars or on transit commuting to offices provides exactly ZERO value to the economy, but the wealthy CEOs and bankers who run the world would rather people suffer needlessly than be slightly less rich.

@Julian-tf8nj

2 ай бұрын

my thoughts, exactly!

@OriginalContent89

2 ай бұрын

Absolutely this!

@thebl3mish

Ай бұрын

It all comes down to this "poster family" of the 1980's where "dad" would commute to downtown and "mom" would stay at home to cook, clean the house and pick up the kids. Nowadays in most families both parents work full time and sometimes you would see them stretching their work hours more and more, WFH and flexible hours was a small blessing for the deteriorating white collar middle class families - but hey the moronic managers wanted to "actually see them working and wasting their life away" so yeah back to meaningless work environments.

@grogery1570

24 күн бұрын

I did wonder why corporations were pushing for a return to office's when in the past they tried every thing they could to reduce expensive rents. Work from home at first glance is a financial gift to corporations.

@Alone47

24 күн бұрын

@@grogery1570but it diminishes the self-importance of management, so …

Odd how world economies go belly-up when billionaires make mistakes, isn't it?

@jimbojimbo6873

2 ай бұрын

Billionares are just the tip of the iceberg, its midde class commoners that work for them helping too We are all in this not just one white woman making decisions in an ivory tower

@hiimjustin8826

2 ай бұрын

Oh but see, the reason they did this is because they wanted to become more wealthy. So I'm sure now you're just full of empathy

@JSwagy

2 ай бұрын

Privatize the profits, socialize the losses.

@felipesuarez5041

2 ай бұрын

The biggest equity holders and one of the biggest investors in the world are pension funds. That means common people that count on this money for their retirement. If these funds fail, people will have nothing to survive on their older years. The alternative to this, is public pension systems, where young people pay for the retirement of old people, which is basically a Ponzi scheme. This does not mean that the managers of these funds should not be held accountable for doing bad decissions with other peoples money.

@snydedon9636

2 ай бұрын

And politicians.

"Office Space" is not an industry.

@crude223

2 ай бұрын

It is a great movie though😂

Just project holographic avatars of remote workers into offices and charge the company for office space. Win - win - win.

@coreyashley4949

2 ай бұрын

The crazy thing, is that people were buying up 'virtual property' for people to roam around in (sometime in the near future). The plan is to have us own nothing and be happy.

Come on guys, we need to be working at the office 14 days a week to save these commerical guys!!

@speciestraitors9297

Ай бұрын

Exactly. The younger generations are so selfish smh

It pains me to have to drive past acres of empty new-ish commercial buildings with big windows and sweeping architecture, and also see empty commercial skyscrapers in the distance that are sitting vacant. Some for years. canada is still in the midst of the worst housing crisis / housing shortage in the history of the nation. I've been "between rentals" for 3 years as of next month (March). No addictions or mental health issues. My stuff in storage and my home based business still on hold. I _want_ to be housed. I just turned 55, but that means nothing here. If even 5% of these commercial properties were converted into housing, people like me would be overjoyed. At this point, stick a toilet and shower in a windowless storage unit and I'd take it. There's no way it's as complicated to convert at least some commercial space to housing as the politicians claim. Builders, architects, and tradespeople back up that statement. It certainly doesn't take years to "study" the issue. Even a law that every commercial building must have at least 1 (to several floors, depending on height) of housing above it would be a start. It worked in Europe for hundreds of years. Every shop had a living space above it. I don't care if I live above a bagel shop at a mini mall, or above a stand-alone stationery store, or in a converted office space. Real people need housing! Now!

@redpilledwarrior4367

2 ай бұрын

It was never about us "Real People". I feel your pains.

@ThePrairieChronicles

2 ай бұрын

@@redpilledwarrior4367 I know we're just numbers, social credit scores, or "eaters" to the 1%.

@LL-qj5vg

2 ай бұрын

they will be occupied by foreigners

@people_are_sheep

2 ай бұрын

China has plenty of money... ...laundered in overseas real estate.

@ThePrairieChronicles

2 ай бұрын

@@people_are_sheep I know. Untold thousands of apartments, condominiums, and houses here in canada sit empty year-round so the сср has mailing addresses / "residency" here. Tax breaks, and more as well. Then there are all the empty "air bnb"s.

Just Let The Banks Fail No bailouts.

@QAYWSXEDCCXYDSAEWQ

2 ай бұрын

If the bank where you keep your savings fails, what do you think will happen to your savings? They like the banks will disappear.

@chris36256

2 ай бұрын

not if you put your money in an FDIC insured bank @@QAYWSXEDCCXYDSAEWQ

@whatisrokosbasilisk80

2 ай бұрын

​@QAYWSXEDCCXYDSAEWQ Should've bought gold. We really need to normalise this idea that wherever you put your money IS A RISK.

@corgiman101

2 ай бұрын

@@whatisrokosbasilisk80you think a totally useless pure metal that you ALSO dont have in-hand is going to help you if the world economy collapses? no, its not. What do you think the price of gold is based on? the fiat currency held by the banks

@206remyboyz7

2 ай бұрын

I Agree anybody would be a fool put all of their savings in a Bank anyways ​

“Privatize Profits - Socialized Losses”. The Capitalist Business Model (or in layman’s terms: Heads I Win; Tails You Lose).

@LarryDickman1

2 ай бұрын

Real capitalism would let the banks or businesses fail. We have Crony capitalism.

Oh my. Who would have ever predicted that greed would create consequences?

Sounds like all these people need to learn financial responsibility.

2:50 they didn’t give money to people they gave money to private banks to cover their debt there’s a major difference

@emptiester

2 ай бұрын

Tell me the difference because i dont know.

@emptiester

2 ай бұрын

@@wbay3848 everyone who works at a private bank is "extremely rich"?

@redpilledwarrior4367

2 ай бұрын

Its funny how so out of touch these guys are to make the notion that "the people" received the money. LOL.

@mvmlego1212

2 ай бұрын

He's not talking about bailouts; he's talking about extremely low interest rates. Granted, the Fed loans to banks, not individuals, but it does strongly affect the interest rates that individuals receive. (e.g. for mortgages)

Honestly yay. The market regulates itself after all.

@wotermelon_

2 ай бұрын

Yeah and that's called anarchy, the market may as well decide that you aren't valuable and "do away" with you.

@GenesisRip

2 ай бұрын

@@wotermelon_A self-regulating market is... "anarchy"...?

@wotermelon_

2 ай бұрын

@@GenesisRip Yes

@prolific1518

2 ай бұрын

Not at all. Fed govt will step in during Biden's election year to make sure it doesn't fall apart.

@redpilledwarrior4367

2 ай бұрын

@@wbay3848 Ikr! Look at all the homeless who cant afford basic needs and pass away due to exposure while camped outside one of these unoccupied skyscrapers. Or are we only talking about bankers here?

At the heart of this is office workers are now working from home. Another gift from COVID

Giant skyscraper office buildings have never been a good idea. They aren't space efficient and can't easily be converted to residential living spaces. We are just now realizing this, but at least we ARE realizing it. Many financial institutions will take a hit, but they deserve it for making a bad investment. Now these stupid things won't be built anymore. Hopefully we can effectively convert them to residential spaces like they are trying to do in NY so we can avoid a total collapse

@georgepoitras3502

2 ай бұрын

But when you do that, the total rent for that building is no longer going to bring $100/Sq Foot as an apartment. In other words the value goes down and richie rich has to add collateral for the loan he took out 5 minutes after this building opened.

Every major societal and technological change has people who lose out because of said change. For this change, it's those who invested heavily in commercial real estate. The world is a better place with fewer companies requiring an unnecessary physical office presence. Those who invested in commercial office real estate will eat the losses, and the world will be just fine.

I've got zero sympathy for organisations that forced people to commute to offices for decades or the real estate owners and developers that profited from that misery.

with remote working becoming more popular, this won't be sustainable

@jimshoe402

17 күн бұрын

My Boss a Builder grew up in Chicago said No Way u need this 35 years ago. We built ESA Hotels too like 20 said these will be Senior Places 20 years from now BUT homeless centers NOW..😝😝😝😝😝

They build fantasy castles while there are people living in tents on the streets. The world is upside down

I hope tax payers don’t have to bail them out too

@wallstreetzoomer

2 ай бұрын

its USA the empire of corporations and the top 1%, cue your hopes.

@DefianceFinance

2 ай бұрын

you can hope away... in the end you will still have to pay.

@renemartin5729

2 ай бұрын

Of course you'll pay. They're too big to fail.

@jeffcampbell2710

2 ай бұрын

It's going to be far worse

@apemancommeth8087

2 ай бұрын

It will!

basically they put the whole economy at risk (again) in order to protect the few individuals who own all the real estate - isn’t it great to have a government that works in benefit of the people they represent (the 1% of course)

I been through the 1970s high inflation, up and down of the stock market like Black Friday, tech bubble and the 2008. Each individual will handle a bad economic differently. If you are not prepared for bad time, it hurts.

Even if interest rates come down, the buildings are not bringing in more revenue. Hello?!? The issue is working from home, over leveraging, high vacancy rates, and geographical dynamics. It’s not interest rates alone.

Wait! I can buy it as a company, live in it. And then declare bankruptcy when people want their money?

It is the exact same problem with all the empty enclosed shopping malls as with all these office towers. There were too many being built throughout both the USA and the rest of the world. Now that technology and societal changes are rendering all these commercial real estate as unneeded and obsolete, the world’s landscape will end up littered with empty shopping malls and office towers that most likely should have never been developed in the first place.

@seed_drill7135

2 ай бұрын

While the end result is the same, I don’t think it was overbuilding that killed the malls. Many of those that have failed were profitable for decades and have no nearby competitors, it’s online that killed them.

@georgepoitras3502

2 ай бұрын

Right because they were never opening new malls to support the communities just to borrow money against the inflated value.

@angelainamarie9656

2 ай бұрын

The people who used to do all that stuff are still here we just don't have any f****** money anymore because wealthy people have vacuumed it all up that's all that's actually happening.

Why would people put time bombs in office buildings? It sounds hazardous.

Start allowing stores in daycare centers to be in those buildings on different levels

Those developers and owners will be bailed out with the money from the workers, who in turn will be fired and not bailed out

This is great to see. I want more debt and more insolvency for commercial real estate. I’m a georgist and also a work from home ultra.

@AAGGHH4

2 ай бұрын

You’ll pay for it via taxes to bail out the banks if it happen. I know you probably think you’re been edgy but actually you’ll be badly affected even if you don’t own the asset that collapses

@marcusmoonstein242

2 ай бұрын

Absolutely agree. The worst thing that the government can do is to protect financial institutions from their own reckless lending. And Georgism is the best tax system.

So the banks took on too much risk? Let them fail.

@neanam

2 ай бұрын

They will fail. But next time they will receive a bail-in not a bail out. Basically the money from depositers will be taken

Cities are dying,,office buildings have work from home,,no overhead rent.

Government bail outs for private investors is fascism.

The real reason companies are forcing employees back to the office; they signed reckless and untenably long office contracts with little vision of the fact that they would soon not be necessary. Now the banks are pressuring them back to the offices and trying to preach that offices somehow give productivity to drive more investment.

@TheRightONe-et3gh

Ай бұрын

BRAVO! I actually I just talk with someone in that situation. The management need to cover for their stupidity.

Should we feel sorry?

Property prices are too high and rents are ridiculous. What economy can survive when rents are eating all the money

Excessive debt is literally the problem with everything. Why not base an economy on earnings and savings? The debt based system makes no sense. 😳

@brent4073

2 ай бұрын

We need to get back on the gold standard if you want people to stop taking out so much debt and abusing debt..

@hostrow

Ай бұрын

Modern economies are based on the premise of constant growth. How does one do that? They do it with debt.

@Alsry1

Ай бұрын

@@brent4073 the gold standard is impossible to go back to. we have too much money in circulation for any of it to be back by gold.

two words "SYSTEMIC RISK"

In monopoly there is no loans on property

It’s all about work from home. Meanwhile residential single family home values keep rising

There’s a simple solution, lack of affordable housing is absorbed by commercial office vacant being converted into mixed used residential.

The banks made a series of very liberal [not conservative ] bad bets. They should not be bailed out nor accommodated. As with any other business, if they make bad bets, they need to fail.

We can all rest assured that when these real-estate giants start to go bankrupt, they will be bailed out by the government with our tax dollars, get told that "it's fine because the money was repaid after a few years!", and more people will lose their homes and jobs. But a few wealthy people will make even more insane wealth! So everything's fine! The bit about everything being fine was sarcastic, sadly. Everything else is going to be what'll happen.

@Westhamsterdam

2 ай бұрын

You have still got the problem what to do with these buildings. They still require huge maintenace.

I had a suggestion to make unused office spaces with flexible mix usable convertible spaces, When there are no office renters it can be easily converted into temporary rental accommodation with movable walls, ready placed plumbing & electrical grid. I even suggested to a office space owner that had been empty for year or more to convert it into pod hostel inspired from Japan's capsule hostels.

One of the big problems not commented on is that office buildings cannot effectively be converted into housing. The plumbing and electrical layouts are not conducive and the cost of modifying those systems is so great that it in most cases makes more sense to tear down and rebuild.

@chapman1569

2 ай бұрын

Couldn't they make large rooms and make the toilets, showers and kitchens communal? It would not be ideal but it could at least help make some affordable rents. In Europe it is common in some places to share a bathroom.

So if there is no need for more office space, why build it??

Real estate is being treated as an asset, which is ridiculous since it doesn't produce anything. It is NOT capital, it continually has wear and requires upkeep, contains continual tax increases. The eventual realization that this is a non productive use of investment has come. the bank and speculators deserve everything they loose. it will force capital to be used for productive means.

The main problem is people are used to property prices massively increasing. Assets appreciating at crazy speed ISNT NORMAL. Assets are supposed to go down sometimes.

There is something to be said about how unregulated and overspeculated an industry is that the words "this is the biggest crisis since" are followed by 2008 and not something 50 years ago. If the crisis cycle is 15 years there is a problem.

Can these office buildings be converted into apartments? Isn’t there a house shortage right now?

@taylor3950

2 ай бұрын

It’s difficult because the layout and plumbing isn’t set up for individual apartments (unless they were huge) it would take a lot of retrofitting

@WW-sw8ls

2 ай бұрын

could all be used for implosion Samples… call Bush

@pepperonish

21 күн бұрын

Some, but it's not cheap. Unless you give pretty big subsidies to the developers, they cannot make it affordable housing. Or if the potential rent isn't high enough, they wouldn't be able to do conversions without taking a loss.

"Asia and America are doing slightly better"? Better than what? Im working from home now and haven't been happier, so this "crisis" is a boon for me.

There's another massive lever for removing money from the economy other than interest rates. Taxes. Raising corporate income tax would have a massive benefit of removing excess capital from corporations, that are by definition doing well. While also not having to necessarily drop rates to zero, which exacerbates the boom and bust cycle of credit sensitive sectors like real estate. Unfortunately we don't have economists in control of taxes, but rather politicians who use corporate taxes like a football for political games.

if interests are lowered i don't see how that solves the bigger problem. There are no tenants. My company is almost completely remote the only in person building we have is warehouse space for the logistics.

2:45 thank you for admitting, too many people don't realize that the mistakes of the past have not yet been paid for... They are putting it on the back of the 99%.

Lots of fear mongering, not a lot of data...

@butwhytharum

2 ай бұрын

The 1% is in alot of debt and trying to fear monger that the 99% of us will hurt... No if you're not in debt and have an income you'll be fine... But if you work for someone else and their in debt... Might not be working soon.

This video might be the most important video on KZread right now!

Doesn’t matter, keep interest rates where they are to keep investors prudent

It all comes down to location. Where I am, I am renting retail space for my business at 10k a month

We have an affordable housing crisis. Instead of preparing to bail out the banks who hold these notes, let’s use federal funds to convert this space to housing.

In our area, there is a large oversupply of office space but owners/landlords have not adjusted lease rates (down) at all. They seem to be authorizing a lot of this problem themselves because they could have lower vacancies if they wanted to.

Love that old film showing a row of bank tellers.

Just convert the excess commercial property capacity to residential real estate. That might ease the chronic shortage of residential space. In Europe, at least.

Just convert them to condos. Solves the housing problem too. Your welcome world

That explains a lot.

In the UK we have been adapting offices for housing for many years but there are a lot of issues. First, there is a long established culture of repurposing buildings which is not the case in many countries. But modern office locks are not easily adapted. The servicing arrangements around a central spine make internal conversion costly and the buildings themselves are often poorly constructed and unattractive. However if it can be achieved at scale you can create housing popular with young people in central locations.

I hope remoto work keep going

Transform them in condos...use them to produce food using LED and hydroponic...Aquaponic?

Awesome news!

simple solution: switch these buildings into flats

Have a nice weekend to you all as well!

You can make it as difficult as you want, but if the zoning laws are changed, and these property companies adjust to the new reality, two problems are solved housing and the property market somewhat saved. It is really wuite simple.

@nextinstitute7824

2 ай бұрын

These companies are not coming back.

Author Harry Dent predicted in 1998 that in the future more and more people were going to work from home because the expanding Internet and infrastructure was going to allow for it. Working from home is cheaper for the company than maintaining expensive office space. In other words, we have known this for 26 years and, yet, construction companies overbuilt on office buildings and creating too much supply. Too much supply means a drop in prices. We all knew this was coming.

😂😂😂😂 This is amazingly awesome!

How come when I get addicted to gambling the debt it creates is my responsibility but when they gamble tax payers pay their debt?!?

Schiedam was the place in the Netherlands with the highest percentage of vacant commercial real estate - retail spaces being the most obvious problem. Spijkenisse had a new development that was questionable "behind the Kopspijker" - half of the ground floor retail spaces have been repurposed into appartements so far and there are still empty spaces aplenty. The biggest space is taken up by a second hand store ... a kind of charity organisation. Online shopping clearly reduced the demand for expensive retail spaces 😮‍💨 but Spijkenisse built more anyway.

AON Center aka First Interstate building in Los Angeles, CA has a small enough floor plate to convert site to condominiums or mix use with hotel. Overlooks newly rebuilt McArthur Park. Wonder if it would pencil out for a conversation?

Maybe the commercial real estate lenders’ over reliance on avocado toast and lattes is coming home to roost. 🤦‍♀️

The nuance is in the details of these loans. Most REIT (real estate investment trusts) have stipulations that buildings cannot rent under a certain price per sqft. So even if the building wanted to get 60% revenue of expected, they couldn't -- the REIT would come knocking and ask for the entire loan back.

The government blocks the obvious solution. We live in a world with housing shortages and office oversupply. Convert the offices to apartments. Keep 1 floor for co-working spaces. Add in a nice cafe and restaurant and convenience store on ground level, a bar on the roof and a nice gym.

I have one near me. They started building it in 2007-2008. It has never had any tenants.

Offices are being converted to residential buildings. Offices are also being converted into other uses such as data centres and etc.

Oh no. Not rich people and banks loosing money. How horrible for them. They might have to fly in the greyhound of the sky instead of private.

@user-qs8zj1kt9g

2 ай бұрын

Rich people wouldn’t suffer, the rest of us would suffer

So why aren't these empty office buildings being turned into affordable housing? If you can buy an entire building for 43 cents, that should be pretty affordable for people to live in right?

Nothing that taxpayer funded bailouts can't fix! Thanks in advance, plebs.

Someone who worked in a bank many years ago told me that banks are allowed to loan $25.00 of "funny money" for every real $1.00 they hold. This means that if the borrower defaults someone has to take the hit for all the "funny money" and that means you and I.