Sweden: *im gonna do what's called a pro gamer move* USA : *you weren't supposed to do that*

@theflanman420420

4 жыл бұрын

Hey, you cheated

@donnebes9421

4 жыл бұрын

theflanman86 all is fair in love and WAR.

@reggiep75

4 жыл бұрын

Not GG.

@RomantikongGinoo

4 жыл бұрын

Crap is crap no matter how expenssive it is 🤣🤣

@B3ni4mjn

4 жыл бұрын

Limach evreone like that

"The Americans never saw it coming, and never saw it leave" sounds badass

@harry_2047

4 жыл бұрын

Tartan holy I read this comment as it was said in the video

@mohdridzuanisa2373

4 жыл бұрын

not if it actually executes an attack. it would lose it's stealth very quickly because everybody would actually be looking harder.

@kaptein1247

4 жыл бұрын

@@mohdridzuanisa2373 no

@rogrock9509

4 жыл бұрын

Kaptein yes actually when tornados are fired they produce a bubble trail and the detonation of a torpedo would expose the submarine even more

@andyduhamel1925

4 жыл бұрын

@@rogrock9509 yet stealth torpedoes are being developed by the Russians ? Germany has apparently helped China do the same if Germany has a hand in it then its serious.

US: We have the best navy in the world Sweden: Hold my Norrlands Guld

@knibbeman

3 жыл бұрын

Haha 👍

@parabellum4224

3 жыл бұрын

😂

@arnebarne3522

3 жыл бұрын

Klockrent!!

@alvarburstrom702

3 жыл бұрын

Legend

@BoxWille

3 жыл бұрын

haha😂😂

USA: you can’t defeat me Sweden: haha submarine go shh

@Justineexy

3 жыл бұрын

Not really. It's worth noting that In real life Carrier can evade Torpedo's or the escorting vessels can and will most likely Launch decoy's and use their CIWS to Destroy the incoming torpedo. Because this was a wargame exercise, The Swedish submarine only had to take photo's While In real life Torpedo's can be very Easily detected on sonar or Spotted by a crew. in real life, The Gotland wouldn't have been able to do multiple Runs on the Carrier, As Once a carrier spots a torpedo then the presence of a submarine would be very clear. Also, The wargame exercise took place on a patch of the sea, In rea life The ocean is much Larger and a real war means The Gotland will have 10 times lesser chance at finding a carrier. So wargames aren't completely Accurate, Which is why Some things might happen in wargames but not in Real war. A lot of people don't understand this and they often make jokes about this without analyzing it them selves.

@RENO_K

3 жыл бұрын

Haha submarie-

@ollelundin3701

3 жыл бұрын

@@Justineexy its a joke. Take it

@totifaddye6587

2 жыл бұрын

It can't

The Swedish take their “don’t get me involved in a war policy” pretty damn serious Post edit after 7months: I never expected this to the most commented and liked comment I ever did

@rykerrobinson8275

4 жыл бұрын

David Vasquez Swedes have some surprisingly good war equipment but not the military budget to mass produce

@generalss3461

4 жыл бұрын

David Vasquez nah they wouldn’t be able to hold an invasion

@ericp758

4 жыл бұрын

TheCamoTrooper 450 Sweden is one of the richest countries though? Do you mean not the money to mass produce or that they don’t prioritize to mass produce?

@davidvasquez08

4 жыл бұрын

Eric Petit they only make to defend the homeland mainly

@generalss3461

4 жыл бұрын

David Vasquez yes but even if they tried against China or the us they would lose

Everybody Gangsta Until The Ocean Speaks Swedish

@tedde9995

4 жыл бұрын

Ja jag brukar prata med havet då och då

@phoz6504

4 жыл бұрын

TDor jag med

@leonpeonleon

4 жыл бұрын

havet pratar svenska nu

@Telruin

4 жыл бұрын

Some hear waves. Swedes hear whispering.

@Zerocarknowledge

4 жыл бұрын

Jo men asså, man pratar ju med havet då och då.

Everybody gangsta until a submarine full of Swedish people taking a sauna pull a World Of Warcraft rogue ability

@thisismyname3928

4 ай бұрын

Sweden: sinks US aircraft carrier Sweden: He was like father to me

That's one sneaky meatball.

@indoctfool9412

4 жыл бұрын

Falukorv..

@Joel_B07

4 жыл бұрын

Troll Berg haha

@Horible4

4 жыл бұрын

It is, but let's not get carried away. The facts here are that the Gotland Class submarine uses an ultra silent propulsion method to avoid cavitation in comparison to other diesel submarines. It's a fun story to think about how a smaller nation like Sweden could sink the mighty nuclear carriers of the United States. But that's all it is. The war game that's talked about was when a Swedish carrier was put in the perfect situation to attack the Reagan: - It had predetermined knowledge of where the carrier would be operating - It was able to attack a ship that was not traveling at its top speed, and therefore was able to keep pace - War games do not take into account countermeasures or weapon system failures The entire point of this story is to foolishly undermine the US Navy. In reality, the Swedish submarine would have no idea where the Reagan is. It doesn't have fuel to be wandering around the oceans for weeks hunting for it. And United States Carriers rarely travel at speeds with which the Gotland can match speed without cavitation occurring. None of these factors mean anything anyways because Sweden is an ally to the United States, no other country has such capable submarines besides the United States and their Seawolf class submarines. Let me ask you something: If it were as easy to sink American Carriers by just making stealthy submarines, why hasn't China kicked the United States out of the Pacific by now? Why does Russia refuse to challenge the United States for the seas? It's because it's not that simple. United States nuclear carriers are the most powerful and well protected weapons of war in the world, and every single Admiral, General and defense member would not argue that. It's an interesting story though, nonetheless. I've just seen it dozens of times now because it's easy to get views with making videos on this topic.

@gamingchair2700

4 жыл бұрын

Horrible4 nah us navy dogshit

@gamingchair2700

4 жыл бұрын

Stickey Sickness us navy dogshit

Shortly after this, Sweden was banned from wargames for lag-switching

@ludvighp6235

4 жыл бұрын

Sir Drabbe that wasn’t a good 1

@ddgaxelnilsson7855

4 жыл бұрын

HACCCC HASHKS

@kweeliso3601

4 жыл бұрын

So true!! French Rafale beat a F22 raptor during a dogfight at the REDFLAG 2009....It was a humiliation for the US airforce. Since then France is no more invited to this event

@BlackKnight-ll8qh

4 жыл бұрын

😂

@tntfreddan3138

4 жыл бұрын

Outmatches everyone in Red Flag and Loyal Arrow air force wargames and now we have the best equipped sea vessels to take out the largest navy on the planet.

I remember that we were told one thing while I was in the Navy, "It doesn't matter how many defenses you have, if the enemy launches enough missiles or torpedoes, a few are bound to go through". That's not what happened here of course, this was a precision attack, but it's just a saying to show us that nothing is invincible and that assumptions and cockiness cost lives and ships.

@fulldangle

3 жыл бұрын

They do these exercises to find weaknesses. The US has already fixed this weakness.

@pieterveenders9793

3 жыл бұрын

@@fulldangle Sure buddy... Like other countries don't adept their strategies and techniques, let alone give them all away to foreign countries such as the US....

@cricketnerdnz3588

2 жыл бұрын

@@pieterveenders9793you sound like a knob ... Yeah backward stuff like thats happening no shit.. you literally just admitted they have to copy AMERICA and act as of AMERICA isn't capable of doing the same... Or developing new strategies.

@richardkroll2269

2 жыл бұрын

There are so many places, so many situations where this submarine would be perfect AND it has been improved since then. " One size fits all" seems pig-headed and a foolish. I think about the Danish Straits, Gibraltar, the strait between Yemen and Eritrea, Strait of Hormuz, and the Singapore Strait all of which have huge ship movements of importance.

@dannygjk

2 жыл бұрын

@@fulldangle Huh? Well of course.

I'm Swedish, and while this is a pride if mine, I'm still glad the US is on our side! 🇺🇲🇸🇪

@thedieselguy4733

3 жыл бұрын

Idek you could sink them big ass things

@breadbug6101

3 жыл бұрын

jerry Kinsey especially considering they never sail alone, usually with other support ships

@iamasmurf1122

3 жыл бұрын

ChonkBoi idiot it was a full battle simulation and they got through if it was real the aircraft carrier would have been destroyed and these war exercises are with a full complement of tech and support ships

@siegfred4868

3 жыл бұрын

@@thedieselguy4733 every aircraft carrier has a group of ships to protect it and one sub around it. it never go alone in the battlefield.

@otto35vhcwhy77

3 жыл бұрын

Im also Swedish!!! Hej!

Who would win A whole task force w a Carrier Or 1 stealthy boi

@anonymous-iu4th

4 жыл бұрын

The stealthy boi

@emiliospowerballer1441

4 жыл бұрын

who would win: usa air force of 5000 aircraft strength with 400 ICBMs Or the country of sweden

@intjin2658

4 жыл бұрын

Emilios Powerballer some1 got offended...

@rrmc_rex

4 жыл бұрын

One aqua viking

@jakob2049

4 жыл бұрын

* one stealthy Swedish boi

US Navy: *Has some of the best warfare technology* Sweden: Ha Ha Submarine go 😶

@jackswed584

4 жыл бұрын

LaggyMcGee it go 😶 real guud

@jackswed584

4 жыл бұрын

LaggyMcGee it go 😶 real guud

@jackswed584

4 жыл бұрын

LaggyMcGee it go 😶 real guud

@asgeiriversen3864

4 жыл бұрын

Is that a bandit on your profile picture?

@grekz2253

4 жыл бұрын

i think that the swedish submarine is one of the best submarine in the world bc it dont make any sound

America: "This is the most advanced and undefeated carrier in the world escorted by a whole fleet of ships" Sweden: "Hold my IKEA table"

@maximilianfehrm9201

3 жыл бұрын

IKEA MEATBALL

@TheRealJaded

3 жыл бұрын

But the us has nuclear subs, lol go against us and you're fuked

@MisterZalgo

3 жыл бұрын

@@TheRealJaded you can’t hurt what you can’t see or hear.

@elismella7870

2 жыл бұрын

Hold my köttbullar

@yksikaksikolmen

2 ай бұрын

ha,ha

USA:we have a entire carrier fleet Sweden’s sub: what carrier fleet I don’t see it?

I don't usually comment on stuff, but you've been doing work on this channel: so consistent, high quality, well researched. Keep it up man.

@johnnyyen4910

4 жыл бұрын

Agreed! Him and mark Felton consistently put out great history videos.

@TheblueTraxxasRustler

4 жыл бұрын

Definitely

@DumbledoreMcCracken

4 жыл бұрын

@@johnnyyen4910 (He and Mark ...). When the pronoun is in the subject of the sentence, use he.

@johnnyyen4910

4 жыл бұрын

Apologies. I shall endeavour to use correct grammar in future youtube comments.

@DumbledoreMcCracken

4 жыл бұрын

@@johnnyyen4910 I just want you to project yourself in a better light. No apologies necessary.

Usa: no you can't just sink our carrier Sweden: haha submarine go shh

@spetsnatzlegion3366

4 жыл бұрын

Bet the captain was laughing his ass off when the US ships radioed in at the end of the games to ask wtf happened

@maxkol4380

4 жыл бұрын

USA: Okay now we're going to have to destroy your whole country with one ICBM and salt the earth afterward. Sweden: Oh crap

@Karl-Benny

4 жыл бұрын

Now imagine a North korean sub with nuclear bomb set of right under a carrier group

@___Me_

4 жыл бұрын

Yes Bjørn,...Kabøøm! :)

@joshstock6591

4 жыл бұрын

@@Karl-Benny imagine 18 trident tipped nuclear missiles turning North Korea into a parking lot. We have submarines that are tracking the submarines that track our submarines lol.

England and US and Russia competing each other on naval power Sweden shows up and sinks US carrier and just leaves US: Houston, we've got a problem

@larryyeadeke2953

2 жыл бұрын

Make believe, nothing more.

@MichaelMulin

2 жыл бұрын

@Trell Brown 🤣🤣🤣🤣💀💀💀

America: lets invest millions of dollars to create giant aircraft carriers Sweden: Lets build a cheap submarine thats stealthy

@americantacos7618

3 жыл бұрын

*billions

@darugdawg2453

3 жыл бұрын

id rather have the carrier than a sub if im a general

@americantacos7618

3 жыл бұрын

@@darugdawg2453 It really depends who you're an admiral for if I were the admiral of the Swedish navy I'd prefer the subs because they can silently defend the coast against a larger navy and their range isn't an issue since they'll never leave the baltic, but if I were a US admiral I'd rather have the carrier battle group because the US will have to go longer ranges and the US naval producing infrastructure is good enough to replace ships in case of them being lost.

@augustus4711

3 жыл бұрын

America: Lets pretend spending $70,000 on haircuts and deduct it from tax.

@americantacos7618

3 жыл бұрын

@@augustus4711 more like United States: Letting all politicians go on multimillion dollar trips mostly foe the hell of it. *uses the taxpayers money like a boss*

I can't find the instructions for this Submarine on the IKEA website, any help?

@hinsh

4 жыл бұрын

ask the Dutch, IKEA belongs to them now

@bendover2461

4 жыл бұрын

Hinsh shhhh, Swedes know more about ikea thank anyone inte the world...

@ludvigs2389

3 жыл бұрын

@@hinsh What a funny joke

@ZaHandle

3 жыл бұрын

Try opening the page in swedish version

@failsbradley6464

3 жыл бұрын

You can’t because it’s not real an aircraft carrier never got sunk since World War II

There are two kinds of warships: Submarines, and targets.

@timtemple5218

4 жыл бұрын

The biggest deterrant is Corona virus. It is a stealth killer. The Roosevelt carrier has been taken out by the virus. The Chinese is being degraded by the stealth virus

@El_Presidente_5337

4 жыл бұрын

@@timtemple5218 You sound like a internet philospher

@theduder7709

4 жыл бұрын

Go away POG.

@richardmayes8797

4 жыл бұрын

@@theduder7709 No Officer. I won't. Who do you think you are?

@Lynch30

4 жыл бұрын

A submarine is the most valuable asset of any navy

Sweden 🇸🇪: sinks US Carrier. America: Yo let us borrow that shit real quick.

@kaito1213

3 жыл бұрын

LOL

And this is in blue waters. Now imagine it in the uneven Baltic, where we've spent the better part of a century mapping and practicing...

@projekktmonarch5766

3 жыл бұрын

who cares about submarins , take a 5k bomb put it 5-10 miles from the coast and sweden ,finnland and norway are gone

@villager1831

2 жыл бұрын

@@projekktmonarch5766 And the US too. Ever familiarised yourself with the concept of DEFCON?

@owo1744

2 жыл бұрын

@@villager1831 The US has defence systems capable of taking out whatever missile Russia has, and over 90% of their (Russias) nuclear bombs are dumb bombs dropped from planes.

@villager1831

2 жыл бұрын

@@owo1744 If you seriously believe that USA would survive a nuclear war situation, you either don’t know what it is or you’re delusional. USA’s best protection is the fact that they are also in possession of said weapons. ICBM’s have the highest chance of being stopped while they’re being launched, after that it’s dependent on a lot of factors, but USA would definitely not go unscathed in any form or shape.

@larryyeadeke2953

2 жыл бұрын

@@villager1831 If it weren't for their space ships.

Swedish navy: sends close up photo of aircraft carrier USA: uh I'm kinda getting bored maybe we should play another game now

@flixy7242

4 жыл бұрын

your name is screwed😂🤣😂

@O5-15.

3 жыл бұрын

Felix Grøn No.

@augustus4711

3 жыл бұрын

If I was the commander of the swedish sub i would have stuffed the torpedo tubes with surströmming cans and fired them at the us carrier. That would have teached them a lesson...

@williamwildsjo1443

3 жыл бұрын

@@augustus4711 too evil

@ar12.

3 жыл бұрын

Putin Bowling with nukes yeah Australia did the same thing but it was a us destroyer.

This is how the swedes won: Swedes Submarine: We'll give 5 boxes of Toblerone if you surrender. US aircraft: We surrender. Swedes: Gives 5 boxes of Marabou chocolate. US: This is not Toblerone. Swedes: We are not Switzerland.

@charbelabboud1759

4 жыл бұрын

Meganonr1 this has to be the best comment i’ve seen in a while 😂😂💀💀

@plabaa1889

4 жыл бұрын

I can't stop laughing 😂 😂

@obosebbe6444

4 жыл бұрын

Stolen

@nikkogorne7202

4 жыл бұрын

TF is that profile pic! Hahahaha!

@pose.2592

4 жыл бұрын

LOL!!! this is the best comment😂

US Navy: Come at me bro Swedish Navy: *Activates ghost organization*

@insertnamehere8

3 жыл бұрын

HAHAHAHAHA

@petter5721

3 жыл бұрын

And the a Visby Corvette disappears into ghost mode as well 😀

@Happy-nc9zf

3 жыл бұрын

U play gta online ryt😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

America has been training with these quiet subs for some years now. I'm sure it's helped improve technology and given all countries involved treasured experience.

This man's talking speed rivals Eminem

@MorningNapalm

4 жыл бұрын

Yeah, annoying. I tried 0,75x playback for a while, but I think it needs 80-85%.

@steelisthemeal

4 жыл бұрын

Morning Napalm what about m&m?😮

@skittlesbutwithchocolatein2274

4 жыл бұрын

Ignorant Ethan what

@Azrazel_qwp

4 жыл бұрын

I think its because he speaks so cut off. So like 2 words, pause, 3 words, pause, 1 word, end of sentence. Its just annoying

@ItzZak178

4 жыл бұрын

I was looking for a comment mentioning this lol

*China be like:* *Feng Feng!... Write this down!!.*

@jordanelder321

4 жыл бұрын

Erik Johnson no

@aycc-nbh7289

4 жыл бұрын

Erik Johnson The US leased that submarine for two more years following this. If there were still any problems, they would have probably leased it for longer. In addition, these subs are 16+ years old and don’t have the technology modern subs have. Although they have noise suppression that was good by 2004 standards, they are no longer as quiet as US vessels.

@Durnelis8148

4 жыл бұрын

@@aycc-nbh7289 "UsA USA uSa usA USA"

@simonkarlsson2252

4 жыл бұрын

@@aycc-nbh7289 True, the swedish kockums have released new subs which are way better. Will be interesting to see how long it takes before US lease one of them and how many years they need in order to find it.

@phoenixfire9176

4 жыл бұрын

In a real life conflict half the task force would be blaring away with active sonar, being quiet does fuck all

The Swedish sub as most likely a diesel electric submarine that can indeed be very stealthy. I was stationed aboard the USS HADDO SSN604 and the only time we were ever detected when stalking a CVN was when we were spotted by a helicopter due to the extremely clear water in the Caribbean. Exercises such as the one high lighted in this video are extremely valuable in the development of both technology and ASW tactics. One possible correction to the video is that surface craft use ACTIVE sonar, that is the rely on the sonar “returns” or pings to echo locate an intruding submarine. The efficiency of active sonar is somewhat mitigated by “Own Ship’s Noise” which is proportional to the speed of that ship. However, my information is somewhat dated and I suspect that sonar technology has changed in the intervening years.

This is why war games are held. To discover weaknesses and learn from them.

Imagine if the Vikings had submarines.

@donmckeoun7990

4 жыл бұрын

Swen put your viking helmet on and get up front we are going to ram big metal ship

@feelx92ger

4 жыл бұрын

@@donmckeoun7990 Venezuela: *starts sweating* See the recent RCGS Resolute incident.

@donmckeoun7990

4 жыл бұрын

@@feelx92ger what's next kamikaze Vikings on surf boards

@williamkillingsworth2619

4 жыл бұрын

What interest would a football team have in boats?

@isaacschmitt4803

4 жыл бұрын

I mean, there's the USS Minnesota. . .

One of the goals of a war game is identify weaknesses of your own forces and tactics. Better to learn in a training environment then in actual combat!

@parkerknowlton8909

4 жыл бұрын

This is the point of a WarGame isn't it? It's meant to test and improve the tactics and technologies used.

@DurzoBlunts

4 жыл бұрын

Problem is any time we've intentionally tried to sink a carrier ourselves it has been much harder than expected. So a wargame "Kill shot" is much different than a real life shot from a sub.

@Ubersnuber

4 жыл бұрын

No shit, Sherlock

@_kenny_7463

4 жыл бұрын

@@Ubersnuber Chill mate

@KuraIthys

4 жыл бұрын

@@DurzoBlunts well, inevitably, the methods used to 'simulate' attacks don't account for all variables. for instance, air-to-air missiles in real conflict have a pretty poor track record, but how do you accurately simulate how the real weapons and defenses function in a wargame where actually firing at the target is off limits? There's limits and factors that cannot be accounted for by any test that doesn't follow through on the actual attack. You can of course, try computer simulations, but that presents a different variation of the same problem - the simulation is only as accurate as the data it's based on, and almost never perfectly reflects reality...

When we all realize that all ships are still steam ships.

@iafozzac

3 жыл бұрын

No, only nuclear ones. Most ships use diesel or diesel-electric

Everybody gangsta until we know Pewdiepie is driving that submarine

@laruspener3409

3 жыл бұрын

That's weak Like shit

@MrLarsgren

3 жыл бұрын

it that fool was commanding that sub entire world would be shelling it just to stop his crappy content,

USA: *We have the strongest navy in the world* Sweden: *HA, Torpedo go boom!*

@skittlesbutwithchocolatein2274

4 жыл бұрын

BRemO usa has all the money but 3 subs is impressive

@fogbank99

4 жыл бұрын

Pro tip: Army = soldiers on land, tanks, etc. Navy = sailors on ships

@rogrock9509

4 жыл бұрын

I mean there is a reason why battle ships were decommissioned due to its size leaving it vulnerable, super carriers are just like that just more defended

@EZLN

4 жыл бұрын

Wow did you think of that all by yourself

@ChinHobbyToys

4 жыл бұрын

How can an army be torpedoed? I guess the torpedo have to fly and detonate n a dry land..😅😅😅😅

USA: Our biggest and strongest aircraft carrier will bring wins to the USA! Sweden: *litterally right next to the carrier* what does this button do?

@anhnguyen-vs7fh

3 жыл бұрын

you forgot to open the tube and heat the torp

@vascodallama8735

3 жыл бұрын

* Torpedo launching infesties *

@Bitchslapper316

3 жыл бұрын

Nuclear submarines can't be detected either, it's been that way for decades. I'm sure this video makes all this technology seem new and cutting edge but stealth submarines aren't new. The thing that makes this submarine design unique is that it's not nuclear powered and can be produced cheap in comparison to nuclear subs.

@arjentromp12

3 жыл бұрын

@@Bitchslapper316 nuclear subs are always more loud than diesel electric boats, the only class that sort of circumvented the problem is the russian Typhoon class, only one of which is operational at this moment. they used a naturally circulating water system for their powerplant, meaning that most of the pumps could be shut-down at low speeds, meaning you only hear the screw blades and the electric engines.

@Bitchslapper316

3 жыл бұрын

@@arjentromp12 The typhoon class is 45 years old and was the largest submarine class ever built, modern submarines have adapted similar technologies. Modern nuclear submarines are as undetectable as the AIP submarines like the one highlighted in this video. The cost of development and resources is what sets them apart.

lol “It was shipped back in a mobile dry dock”. They literally tore it apart no doubt haha. BLOODY good thing this was a training exercise. Our American brothers obviously learnt how to mitigate this specific threat. I think this shows the priceless value of these exercises well done guys

Sweden: decides to sink a aircraft carrier America: how do you like the sound of a nuclear siren

@illuminatiaqi6130

3 жыл бұрын

@Steve Smith lol didnt you know this is fake

@DambergStudios

3 жыл бұрын

@@illuminatiaqi6130 Whats fake?

@nospoilers7144

3 жыл бұрын

@@illuminatiaqi6130 no it was not

@user-dz2jv4in5z

3 жыл бұрын

Is this some kind of weird joke or are you serious?

@Alex-ft9jy

3 жыл бұрын

@Steve Smith 1) the guy is ironic 2) It was a simulation...the Uss Ronald Reagan is still in active service today and is one of the biggest aircraft carriers on earth

*When the quiet kid stands up to the teacher in class:*

@texan6673

3 жыл бұрын

It was a war game, not a belligerent teacher classroom situation.

@themax2848

3 жыл бұрын

Texas Hunter sorry dad

@MrJjppff

3 жыл бұрын

Texas Hunter sorry dad

@cavemanlovesmoke4394

3 жыл бұрын

@@texan6673 sorry dad

@sensei_monke798

3 жыл бұрын

Texas Hunter sorry dad

USA and Russia: We have the best military! Sweden: Starts WW3 and takes over the world Edit: Wow! My most liked comment ever! I just wished I had this many subs.

@MichaelBylehn

4 жыл бұрын

The only way they'll achieve that is through their Trojan horse bases scattered all around the world, codenamed IKEA.

@AggeNoob

4 жыл бұрын

Sweden have no Money but they have brainsss :D ( Swedish) vi har inga pengar med vi har hjärnor. :D

@MaskinJunior

4 жыл бұрын

No, we let the super powers fight it out, and we gladly sell them the arms to do so.

@robban2252

4 жыл бұрын

Agge Noob sweden has no money?? what are u talking about, we have great economy here lol

@MaskinJunior

4 жыл бұрын

@@robban2252 To be fair, we are a small country by absolute numbers, we are only wealthy if you start to calculate wealth per capita.

“Not putting anyone’s life at risk?” Tell that to me and the other paratroopers again. Lol.

“technically IKEA maker slipped thru the Carrier Battle Groups defenses”

@rb3425

4 жыл бұрын

I wonder how many screws came in that kit?

@NewEnglandViews

4 жыл бұрын

R B And did it come with that shitty little wrench 🔧 😤

@kennetkarlsson4834

4 жыл бұрын

IKEA VS WALMART Carrier .

@tobiasjansson2912

4 жыл бұрын

We have it here in ikea😂

@zoolkhan

4 жыл бұрын

carrier made by same people that build cities of paperhouses beeing wiped away each year when the hurricanes come.

I’m thinking it’s best to have your vulnerabilities exposed early so you learn to defend them - I'm sure this is a good thing in the long run (thank goodness we have friends like Sweden as well!)

@andersgrassman6583

2 жыл бұрын

Well, it work's both ways. :-D Sweden can not single handed fight Russia. We also need friends.

US Navy : Haha,Super Carrier go Brrr Gotland : I'm about to end this man's whole Carrier

“Stirling engine” is just a fancy way to say Sven was sitting in the back of the submarine with a pedal and some Norrlands Guld

America: "super stealth submarine from Sweden" Sweden: Wait "super stealth" you guys dont have good submarines?

@karrskarr

4 жыл бұрын

Sub standard! :P

@kaalisurfer600

4 жыл бұрын

They think that have the most advanced weapons lol

@konzetsu6068

4 жыл бұрын

Pumping money into the military was the only way for the us not to be classed as a third world country....oh wait...

@the-blues-three

4 жыл бұрын

@Rory Spoons Also the people are suffering because the healthcare system is failing 😒

@maxfuentes496

4 жыл бұрын

Wudi ' we aren’t suffering. We’re actually quite fine. I’ll live in New York, the epicenter of the corona virus in the US, and things aren’t as bad as they say on the news. The news always portrays things worse than they really are. So no people are not suffering as much as you think. Some may be suffering but it certainty isn’t everyone

"A super stealth sub from Sweden", try saying that five times fast.

@stephenle-surf9893

4 жыл бұрын

Keep taking a whiskey in between, it's the only way I'm going to get through the lock down with some of my sanity

@saltyoddball550

4 жыл бұрын

He only speaks at super-fast speed already

@nommadd5758

4 жыл бұрын

"Swedenastan"

@arturs2436

4 жыл бұрын

Portuguese sub"Barracuda" did similar to "USS Eisenower" during an mid 80s NATO exercise.

@pauljohansson363kagy5

4 жыл бұрын

@@nommadd5758 Wanker

US Navy Captain: Any report? US Navy guy: Sir, everything is normal, but our sonar guys are hearing a boss music...

I think it's fairly safe to say that the Swedish crew were quite happy with the result of the war games. It could be said that a fleet of submarines based on this design, or even just a squadron of such craft (like the German Wolfpacks of WWII) would be a real danger to a carrier group.

@toga1022

Жыл бұрын

It is equally safe to say that any country that might do that . . . is taking on a death wish . . .as in the worlds largest 8K degree glass field.

And the americans where so impressed that they leased the submarine with crew for a whole year afterwards. So that they could analyze and develop tactics.. :) Proud to be a swede

@cassu6

4 жыл бұрын

I wouldn’t be proud that my government gave away military secrets to another country.

@anumeon

4 жыл бұрын

@@cassu6 They didn't. Tactics sure. Technology. No way

@PJ-kj3ef

4 жыл бұрын

US also leased the sweedish stealth frigate, as they couldn't get a reliable radarsignature on it. It did really resemble a much smaller fishingwessel, and would be devastating as an opponent without direct line of seight and visible confirmation.

@Riddle6EOS

4 жыл бұрын

Ye well but I doubt umerika would be rdy to conquer a land like Sweden. As far i know usa never fought a winter war in the Mountains. Swedens military is no joke on their home front.

@Riddle6EOS

4 жыл бұрын

@Rory Spoons lol its Funny you even mention it. Well ofc not the only rival to us, is russia. All im saying is. If America had to Conquer Sweden for some far future reason. I dont think it would be as easy as it might seem.

As a former submariner ( USS Flasher SSN613, 1977-81 ) I’m not surprised a modern Swedish submarine can ambush a carrier. We’d get very close to aircraft carriers. Non-nuclear submarines are more quiet than the boat I served on.

@lostinspacestudio

4 жыл бұрын

Why is that you would think that nuclear would be quieter?

@shinjithenegotiator2795

4 жыл бұрын

@@lostinspacestudio non-nuclear subs don't have a turbine in them but nuclear have an infinite range comparatively well only limited by human consumables

@Idahoguy10157

4 жыл бұрын

Christian Hogue ... Diesel Electric non-nuc boats are quieter when operating on batteries. Nuc boats as I was on had steam turbines and seawater pumps operating. Electric motor propulsion operating off off a battery are quiet in comparison. However nuc boats have much greater endurance over diesel-electric boats. I left submarines before the newer AIP boats were operating. I can’t speak on those.

@SammywiseG

4 жыл бұрын

@@lostinspacestudio Nuclear subs and ships have machinery that has to continuously run because of the reactor. Diesel subs can shut everything off to become noiseless. When I was a sonar operator in the Royal Canadian Navy (HMCS Regina) I always found it easier to find and track nuclear subs because of this.

@Idahoguy10157

2 жыл бұрын

@@SammywiseG ….The trade off is operational range. A nuclear boat can swiftly cross the Pacific from the west coast or rapidly transit towards from the east coast too the the Mediterranean or northern waters. I’m not saying this to disparage non-nuclear submarines.

this goes to tells that there are only two types of ships in the ocean, Subs and targets.

Alternative title: A Swedish submarine take a photo of a nimitz class carrier close range

Just like when Swedish Gripen Fighter-Planes beat the Americans in 3 war games without losing a single round

@TheHelghast1138

4 жыл бұрын

Indeed! Sweden has some of the best arms manufacturing on the globe, absolutely world class military hardware... it is genuinely unfortunate that their government sucks so much.

@cgustafson240

4 жыл бұрын

While the Gripen is without a doubt an excellent platform. Especially for a nation like Sweden where their roles are defensive rather than offensive. I would really like to see the study that you were talking about. Any idea as to the name of it or a link to it?

@BatMan-oe2gh

4 жыл бұрын

@@cgustafson240 theaviationgeekclub.com/former-swedish-air-force-flight-engineer-explains-how-the-saab-gripen-can-dogfight-and-win-against-almost-any-dissimilar-aircraft/

@jontee3437

4 жыл бұрын

The three rounds you were talking about were against Norwegian pilots. Now lets be fair. The Gripen A version which was what the article was talking about, is even with some and better than most of the fighters of its era. Meaning these were planes with 80s and 90s tech. The Gripen E is comparable to the F35 and Sweden themselves say it possibly isn't quite as good, most of which has to do with the stealth technology that the F35 and F22 have which the Gripen does not have.

@swedfilms

4 жыл бұрын

And not a single time has the US Abrams been able to take out the Swedish modified Leopard 2.. Or any other country using a variant of the Leo for that matter.

That happens more than people think. A carrier goes out to sea for war games, the sub attached to the battlegroup will routinely make mock attacks against the carrier, and they do sink the carrier. It's called practice.

Who would win. A top of the line navy technology and an entire escort group. One Ikea Sub.

@justinpohl8986

3 жыл бұрын

The Imperium of man, under the leadership of the God-Emperror.

@hahathatsucks8019

3 жыл бұрын

Underrated

@MrStelmacki

3 жыл бұрын

The top of the line technology. Which wasn’t allowed to be used during this war game.

@robert4you

3 жыл бұрын

Never underestimate IKEA 🤣

This vessel is actually a good example of the Swedish way of doing things. We are a small nation in size, so we compensate lack of numbers with very high levels of technology and science. We dont build ten things, we build one that does the job of ten.

4 жыл бұрын

Do they service the whole sub with one wrench???

@Marcusianery

4 жыл бұрын

@ Yes, blessed by Saint Kamprad of Ikea himself.

@NUMMEHARBEN

4 жыл бұрын

@@Marcusianery LOL

@Malsum

4 жыл бұрын

Jokes aside, maintenance and durability is so to speak "scienced the shit out of", and that gives Swedish equipment cheap and long usage. The Swedish SAAB 39 Gripen fighter jet cost about 4800$ per flight hour, while only the fuel costs of the eurofighter Tycoon is about 18K. And American planes are ranging from 11-35K in maintenance

@carlcollins3705

2 жыл бұрын

You might want to actually listen to the vid and try to think a little. These subs have very limited capabilities. Then again, the Sweds don't need much.

Swedish army : FLOOR GANG! Swedish navy : UNDER WATER GANG!

@christiangustavsson7400

4 жыл бұрын

Under water floor gang?? 😁

@bremo2059

4 жыл бұрын

*underwater ceiling gang*

@te0nani

4 жыл бұрын

Swedish Air Force: Ceiling Gang! Navi/Army: SMALL PEEPEE

@prodnikolaii2841

4 жыл бұрын

drain gang

@kasra5061

3 жыл бұрын

Peanut butter jelly time

Awesome ! Congratulations Sweden 🇸🇪 I salute you. !!!

in real life, swedish submarine kills US Aircraft Carrier, 1 hour later swedish capital city has the shape of a mushroom cloud.

@vegetalimatoa5706

3 жыл бұрын

True lol

@russianarmy-rh2wi

3 жыл бұрын

LOL I GET IT

@gregchristopher2638

3 жыл бұрын

I think the point might be we need to do a better job with carrier contingents lol. Because we should be worried about bigger adversaries than sweden.

@simontili3374

3 жыл бұрын

"The Americans never saw it coming, and never saw it leave" who they will bomb?

@franklinkokong3598

3 жыл бұрын

Hahahahahahahhaa

People often dismiss diesel-electric subs as some WW2 relic. That couldn't be farther from the truth. The reason nuclear subs are generally 'better' is mostly due to the fact that they tend to have newer components. A well designed diesel-electric sub with the newest technology is just as good as a nuclear-powered one. In fact, since a nuclear reactor cannot be easily shut down, modern diesel-electrics are actually significantly quieter than nuclear subs. So if you only want to use your subs defensively, diesel-electric is very much the better choice. Add in the fact that a nuclear sub still has to replenish supplies for the crew on a regular basis, which significantly negates its main strength of infinite range, it's very reasonable that everyone is investing in diesel-electrics again.

@DurzoBlunts

4 жыл бұрын

For a blue water centered navy (USN) nuclear is the way to go. Supplies can be replenished at sea, in a small port overseas or large port at home. The gotland excels at defending its nations home watets, what it was designed for. Nuclear subs are for long extended duration missions. They'll stay under the waves longer than a diesel can for air before needing supplies only. 111 days is a long time without needing to surface. Nuclear reactors dont need to be shut down for very quiet running... They shut down cooling pumps under no speed or very slow speed and let natural convection current of water cool the reactor. Thus allowing them to disappear into the noise of the ocean.

@Rullstolsboken

4 жыл бұрын

@@DurzoBlunts the Gotland class sub use liquid oxygen so it cam stay underwater for it's whole mission

@bonedoc4556

4 жыл бұрын

@@Rullstolsboken If thier whole mission is 2 weeks then yeah. It's right tool for the job in coastal defence.

@shepardpolska

4 жыл бұрын

@@DurzoBlunts I thought that even with no pumps working, nuclear reactors will vibrate unless shut down completely, and as such still be more noisy then a non-nuclear submarine can be. I heard it on Jive Turkey channel. I think he said he served on a nuclear sub, but I heard all that long ago so I don't want to say that as a fact.

@TheAtomicSpoon

4 жыл бұрын

@@shepardpolska Jive was a sonar man iirc.

3:17 that looks like a horrible touchscreen, if you have to press it three times to register

@zipp4everyone263

4 жыл бұрын

Yeah, imagine using that in a ready environment... "So, why did we loose all of our subs?" *Awkward silence "You know that touch screen?"

@jesusvazquez326

4 жыл бұрын

Lol

@ampeg187

4 жыл бұрын

Windows Vista

@peterg.8941

4 жыл бұрын

@@ampeg187 🤦‍♂️

@mjfan653

4 жыл бұрын

maybe its a rocket go boom button, needs an extra "do you really want to kill em all?" layer to it

Back in the 1960's a college classmate went to work in Groton and was told that the concept of sinking a carrier was that a torpedo would be detonated about an eighth of a mile under the sub which would create a bubble into which the carrier would fall and, likely, not even leave an oil slick!

“Is packed with features...”, shows a man pushing 5 times the touchscreen cause it’s not responsive xD

It's hardly shocking. The Swedes did it but so did the French, Germans, Dutch and possibly even the Inuit. Despite all the technological advances of the last years, submarines are almost impossible to detect. That's why they say that there's only two types of ships: submarines and targets.

@JC130676

4 жыл бұрын

@@markj2093 Yes, pumps can be loud but not always. Even a passively cooled reactor can create noise from bubbles or flow through the coolant lines. I was mostly thinking of (diesel) electric subs. The latest generation can use hydrogen fuel cells to generate electricity and the electric motors are coupled directly to the prop shaft. So, no pumps or gearboxes at all. The easiest way to find those subs might be to look for the "black hole" in the sea where absolutely no noise is coming from...

@coledavis5212

4 жыл бұрын

JC130676 Hold up. The Inuit? Can you explain?

@JC130676

4 жыл бұрын

@@coledavis5212 No. It was a highly classified operation so if you want to know, you'll have to go there and ask them yourself. ;-)

@lappietova6277

4 жыл бұрын

Deepest secrecy by Jaime Karremann is a good book about 6 Dutch submarines operations. Gathering intelligence about Soviet Navy during the cold war..

@30AndHatingIt

4 жыл бұрын

"submarines are almost impossible to detect" Germany's Uboats were devastating convoys at the beginning of WW2, but by the end were routinely detected and sunk at alarming rates.

"I'm about to end this man's whole carrier"

@midget_spinner8449

4 жыл бұрын

How original

@razor1uk610

4 жыл бұрын

..I read what'yer did thar... ;) :P

US: Hah we have one of the most powerful Navy's in the world!! Sweden: A sh*t there's a big fish blocking our way *proceeds to sink down the carrier* US: Uhh sir we have a problem Sweden: A finally back to getting meatballs

Sweden: "LOL. Sunk UR carr, NOOB!" US: "Fucking campers."

Sabaton: *[nervous sweating]*

@raycowplayzyt29

4 жыл бұрын

*insert Carolus Rex*

@heneraldodzz4978

4 жыл бұрын

Eating meatballs patriotically

@jaomircourtar1501

4 жыл бұрын

Yessssssssssssss

@heckleypanes4988

4 жыл бұрын

Dominum Maris Baltici

@ryanhopf8324

4 жыл бұрын

I was gonna post this

The best training exercise for us was this one where that Swedish sub handed us our ass on a platter. We learned, or rather, I hope we learned.

@bonedoc4556

4 жыл бұрын

@Joakim von Anka Exactly. Always training and working your own weaknesses. Don't and you die.

@PepRex

4 жыл бұрын

Didn't learn from the Australian subs before hand obviously. What makes you think they'll learn now?

@cgustafson240

4 жыл бұрын

@@PepRex from some stuff I was recently reading, about the newest Australian Subs in the pipeline. It appears that some very political decisions were made over the military brass. In buying some extremely expensive French equipment with a lot of shortcomings and cost overruns. It sounded like you guys kinda got the shaft on that one. So I would like to hear your opinion on it?

@PepRex

4 жыл бұрын

@@cgustafson240 I don't know I'm not Australian, I just know they sunk a carrier in exercises.

@JustifyJustin

4 жыл бұрын

@Joakim von Anka Out of interest, has Russia ever occupied Sweden or made moves against her in recent times? From what I gather, Russia's military is geared for defence, similar to Sweden's. The US is one of the few nations with an occupation and projection military. Anyhow, emotions aside, I'd be more concerned about your government's open door policy to (radical) refugees leading to previously unheard of scenarios as in Malmo. You may well find your nation will be taken from within, not from a neighbouring nation...

”Russia, America’s eternal advercery has ordered two diesel electric attack submarines, scheduled for completion by 2022” 😳😬

Very valuable learning experience. Glad the Swedes worked so hard to challenge our defences and score this victory or we would have never learned anything about our shortcomings. If they didn't do this, we could have left ourselves open for a real catastrophe I the future. This is why these exercises are so vital. Thank you Sweden....and very well done.

Another popular thought is: *is the gripen good? Ans: ask the typhoon pilot. They know about it

@vidarrehnstrom5091

4 жыл бұрын

And they will say it is good

@johanlassen6448

4 жыл бұрын

@@vidarrehnstrom5091 Its decent.

Humility is a good thing.

@RevenantCheetosx

4 жыл бұрын

Murica used this to lure Russia to attack!

@skyhiker9669

4 жыл бұрын

RevenantCheetosx not familiar. Do explain plz. Very curious.

@growingsubstostartacommuni3822

4 жыл бұрын

How is this good

@skyhiker9669

4 жыл бұрын

I have A life “humility is the path to all success. Pride is the downfall of the successful.” -George Washington.

@veryoriginalname3823

4 жыл бұрын

@@growingsubstostartacommuni3822 If we just shook it off, and said it was a stroke of luck then we'd have our carriers get sunk in an actual war. No military is perfect so naturally someone bested us in something, but now we can adjust so Chinese, and Russian diesel subs won't be a threat. Not only that but now we've let the Swedes know they have very effective submarines, and should continue perfecting them.

We all know for damn sure that the captain of the Swedish submarine had a wide smirk from ear to ear after they hit the carrier

That is a massive beast of a carrier. It really is crazy that those serving in one side of the Carriers like the Reagan class as crew. They may never meet anyone who serves on the other side in 20/25 years of service. As crews are designated to certain areas and do not pass into other areas like the command and fire room etc that are highly classified areas not for everyone’s eyes!

When you realize that the IKEA approved submarines are sinking your entire fleet of aircraft carriers....

"Hmm, yes, please continue" -- Vladimir Putin (jotting notes down)

@TheHelghast1138

4 жыл бұрын

Haha! So true!

@andreworiez8920

4 жыл бұрын

Until he tries it and his Kilo gets blasted before getting into position....why? Because we TRAINED against a more proficient crew with better technology

@andreworiez8920

4 жыл бұрын

@Rae West Accidents happen... And. Sure the boats maybe quite... But Russian training? Basic sonar capabilities?... Those still lag behind the West to the point where coastal ops are their only chance against the US Navy... Fortunately allied navies have exposed that issue with our training....

@thebritace9351

4 жыл бұрын

Andrew Oriez the smaller the army the more well trained it needs to be, that’s why Russia and the US don’t train to the same level as the European powers, they don’t need to.

@andreworiez8920

4 жыл бұрын

@@thebritace9351 I beg to differ.... The United States trains hard and it's excellence is only matched by the other NATO members.... Our personal are among the best out there, and we strive to raise the bar for our allies just as they raise the bar for us..... Our training is just as good as our European Allies.... And vice versa.....

the US navy when they find out it was a swedish sub: PEACE WAS NEVER AN OPTION

my brother showed me this video without watching the whole thing and thought that Sweden and the US were actually at war and I've already seen this video and told him ww3 has started, that was 2 hours ago and he's still looking for information bout it, he's also 12

I wish to comment that since the inception of Dark Docs, the videos have been consistently great, and in my observation, becoming steadily better. Also, I very much like the narrator's voice; his delivery incites within me a sense of suspense and mystery, and my preference for this over the Dark 5 read-only content cannot be overstated. Finally, I have been favorably impressed with the selection of topics. I hope that you will keep this great channel going.

When a silent hunter veteran player gets his hands on Swedish submarine

@Leonidae

4 жыл бұрын

*Cold waters

When you thought you passed an IKEA, but realized it was too sturdy too late

Something pretty significant that they didn’t mention however is that after the first shot is fired the submarine would be giving up its location and there’s no guarantee the shot would even land due to the defenses that the carrier support group has. Still interesting how cheaply these stealth submarines can be made and how efficient they are at what they do.

@Nautilus1972

Жыл бұрын

Not the point. A tiny sub would have sunk an aircraft carrier. Yes, it would have been a suicide mission, but a successful one …this was mentioned on Sea Power

Zr Ms Walrus, a submarine of the Dutch navy did something similar back in 1999. It 'sunk' Aircraft carrier USS Theodore Roosevelt and 8 escort ships during exercise JTFEX 99-1

@Jesse-qq2uh

4 жыл бұрын

Alex Postma correct.

Some other folks have commented on wargames vs real life, so that's a dead horse. But here's another: The white "low-side" AAR will reflect what the US Navy wants to release. In this case, a sub penetrated our picket and sank our carrier. This can be done as impetus to tighten up SOPs TTPs etc. Or nefariously, try and convince Congress that more money is needed to secure the fleet. The black "high-side" AAR reflects a total different result and data set. You (KZreadrs and this Channel) will never know if the task force spotted it or not. The absolute margins of capabilities are closely held state secrets. Similar to the actual top speed of the SR-71 which is still classified decades after its decommissioning. So take whatever you read about these claims with a grain of salt. It is in no one's best interest, if they work for the US Navy, DOD, or US R&D to EVER tell you what they can and can't detect, and what they can and can't do.

@saikaveti

4 жыл бұрын

Exactly what I was thinking ... We don't know many things here to make a conclusion

@samini123

4 жыл бұрын

As a son of a man who have been on submarines for years as a profession in Sweden.. Yeah they don't get spotted. Check the games with the Russians as well for answers.

@natskivna

4 жыл бұрын

Imagine how destabilizing this is if true. Yeah, your 13 billion dollar floating airfield is obsolete..... Something tells me that if true, then new anti sub tactics have been figured out by now. Or maybe it was all one big false flag in an attempt to convince our adversary's to pursue this sub's technology to their detriment. Who knows?

@Comment957

4 жыл бұрын

Frank Hoy, i'm with you on this. If the U.S. Navy is leaking the tactical capabilities and weaknesses of its primary platform for projecting power, it has much bigger issues than losing a war game with Sweden. Your suggestion regarding budgetary increases is very plausible, but I also see a possibility that a video like this is part of a global disinformation campaign, a "false flag" sort of thing.

@pieterveenders9793

4 жыл бұрын

@@natskivna Oh it is true, in the open seas and oceans diesel-electric subs are fairly useless against even conventional powered aircraft carriers, let alone nuclear ones. However in the coastal areas for which they were meant, diesel electrics pretty much rule supreme, and especially those build by Japan, Sweden, Denmark, the Netherlands and Germany. At least half a dozen navies have scored hits during wargames against the US navy, including their carriers, that's nothing new. What a lot of people seem to forget is that it isn't just the qualities of the subs which make them so stealthy and efficient, but that the superior tactics used by their captains is what really turns them into such incredibly powerfull naval weapons.

Thank you Scotland, for the Stirling engine! I've read a lot of comments when it comes to superiority, which is always an ongoing battle. There are claims that the U.S. made the hard part (the engine of Jas 39 Gripen), and that that is the reason fopr the Swedish success,etc etc... But the fact is, we all stand on the shoulders of giants, so however you implement the knowledge and inheritance of this, is key. Also how you educate people is key. Simple fact is that we learn from each other, and in competitions, Sweden always wins ;)

The tree talks vietnam, the snow talks finish and the water talks swedish

I thought my playback speed was messed up at first..

The crew must've felt so tense as it snuck through and then super pimps after doing what they just did

You missed Australia from your list, with it's Collins Class, Diesel/Electric Subs!

that submarine: im gonna sink this man carrier

German U 24 'sunk' USS Enterprise during JTFEX 01-2. HNLMS Walrus of the dutch navy also penetrated the carrier group around USS Theodore Roosevelt. Sadly for the US Navy, this is not a unique event.

@pieterveenders9793

3 жыл бұрын

Walrus has the biggest wargame kill score of any Navy ever, absolutely slaughtering the US Navy. Not just an US aircraft carrier like half a dozen countries have scored a kill against. No, the Walrus scored a kill against the Roosevelt, along with it's command ship, 7 destroyers and frigates, and to top it all of a US Navy nuclear attack submarine. All of that and managing to remain undetected and unharmed while getting away scott free. Brutal....

I was in US Navy, I actually exercised with this boat.....Very Tough, Very Maneuverable, GOAT boat, Gotland!!

@stefanhaglund1665

4 жыл бұрын

More like Goth boat.

@Ackalan

2 жыл бұрын

@@stefanhaglund1665 No no, Gutarna (people from Gotland) ain´t Götar (Goths, who lives in Östra and Västra Götaland). The pun is that Gotlands (the island the sub is named after) is that the goat is the island's coat of arms.

American: We have the best Navy Sweden: Well see about that

Obviously a very good captain and crew. well done!

My country finally did something cool

@bikerd8497

4 жыл бұрын

Abba

@tommytesticles8105

4 жыл бұрын

Idk rally is cool

@melle2357

3 жыл бұрын

Vad menar du

@melle2357

3 жыл бұрын

Kolla Sverige under kalla kriget

@bryankeithguillory1355

3 жыл бұрын

I love Volvos! I have owned 2 of them. Too bad they stopped making the inline T6 engine my S60 has. Volvo also makes the best seats in the industry. Great cars, Erik, be very proud!

Surprising?No! During war games an Australian Oberon class sub penetrated a carrier battle group,(simulated) sunk the Carrier,resupply ship, 3 destroyers. The only reason that the US Navy knew that losses had been taken was that after every shot a flare had to be launched by the sub. This was back in the early 90s.