Its like a math class. I couldn't understand anything

@joshmaxwell4806

3 жыл бұрын

@Blaine Russell it’s not

@brunomartinello7507

3 жыл бұрын

AHUHUAAHUAUHAHUAHUHAUHUAHUA same bro... same =(

@Austyn_Young7

2 жыл бұрын

Fr

@codzlaw

2 жыл бұрын

Look on 0 coefficient it's based on you and your sense every 10% u turn is 10% on screen. Let's say to edge of screen is 100% and you have a coefficient of 178 if u divide 178 by 10 to get 10% that's 17.8 so every 10% you turn mouse is 17.8% on screen (they don't match). Now your 100% screen divided by 17.8 is 5.6 so 56% of your mouse turn will put you at edge of screen the other 44% is out of screen. If u want to get use to your mouse and sense then put it at 0 and its all down to you to build that muscle memory. If you put every game on 0 then they should all feel same assuming your sense is same and in theory help you get used to your tools not a sense based on some math. I no its more math but hope it helps just think higher coefficient will make it feel higher sensitivity cos 10% mouse turn is 17.8% on screen.

@S3V1ET_N1NJA

11 ай бұрын

​@@codzlawok say that again but in english

Tried this on console and it made a huge improvement for me, it made it way more easy to target specific parts (engine/wings) on planes.

Correct me if I’m wrong, but you never actually explain why the 0% is better. You explain why 133 isn’t the best, and tell us that some other people on mouse and keyboard are using 0%. But what actually changes when we switch to 0%? That’s not something that I would feel comfortable switching without a clear description of why it’s actually better

@auspexdk1564

2 жыл бұрын

been playing with it for like a year now and it is 100% better

@tetchedskate3366

2 жыл бұрын

@@auspexdk1564 can you tell me what the change is though? Just because it’s better for you doesn’t mean much for others, so I’d still love to actually know what changes

@LetsCrappieFish

2 жыл бұрын

@@tetchedskate3366 Have you tried it? If you don’t play better, just switch it back. I’m about to try it now

@tetchedskate3366

2 жыл бұрын

@@LetsCrappieFish not knowing what it does can make it very difficult to notice a difference, even if that change is significant on paper. And at this point, I don’t even play bf5. Bf4 had been my go to

@LetsCrappieFish

2 жыл бұрын

@@tetchedskate3366 so what does it do exactly?

Tried these settings out the other night..saw a big improvement after 1 game, cheers

Finally, my favourite Pilot is back, good to see ya again man.

@SilkOCE

3 жыл бұрын

Appreciate you coming back to watch!

Your a legend. You didn’t need to share this information but you did. Thanks so much!

@SilkOCE

3 жыл бұрын

No problem!

Correct me if I'm wrong but I'm pretty sure the co-efficient setting in BFV is monitor distance *vertical* not horizontal. So, on the horizontal axis, 133% is actually 75% of a 16:9 screen but it is 100% of a 4:3 screen, this is the setting both older BF titles (3 and back) and CS (1 zoom sens) use. I think BF1 is the one game where it is monitor distance horizontal so 133% is indeed over the screen edge like this video shows (assuming a 16:9 aspect ratio). It doesn't matter whether it is horizontal or vertical if you will set it to 0% though, obviously.

@SilkOCE

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah I think that's actually correct. Either way I'd still use 0%

Hmmm, I have tried both 133% and 0%. I honestly preferred 133%. It felt more consistent to me. With 0%, I noticed that the more zoomed in I was, the slower my ADS was. This kind of annoyed me b/c my general sensitivity is already low. Adding the extra distance I need to move my mouse when zoomed in caused me to run out of mouse pad space constantly. So to compensate, I increased my general sensitivity. This solved my issues regarding running out of space on my mouse pad when zoomed in. However this solution created a new issue. My sens at 1x and low zooms became too high. I was having difficulty aiming. I thought that perhaps I just needed to adapt. So I gave it a week. I would have moments where my aim was spot on, but overall I felt inconsistent. And I think that was my problem with 0%. Sensitivity is inconsistent between zoom levels. When I went back to 133%, my aim became much more consistent almost instantly with my new higher general sensitivity. I was doing just as good/bad with high zoom scopes and low zoom scopes. I then lowered my general sensitivity and boom, my aim became godlike almost. I don't mean toot my own horn or anything but thats honestly how I felt. IMO 133% feels much much better. Of course, I have no scientific reasoning, simply anecdotal reasoning. Purely going off of what I felt.

@SilkOCE

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah so I said in the video that lower sensitivities might not transfer to this setting as well. But honestly if one option feels better than the other, then there's no reason to care about the math or reasoning.

@TomTheSurgen1

Жыл бұрын

@@SilkOCE I felt much the same as this guy. I also only run 75-90 base sensitivity. I ads a fair bit at close range and this was far to slow. Is there anything wrong with running 0% coefficient which I believe bf4 was and uping the ads sensitivity. I’m on ps5 playing 2042. I seem to remember my bf4 settings had ads about 120% soporific I could still ads strafe someone at 10 yards

Hey man, stumbled across this yesterday and figured I’d give it a shot. Honestly I found it hard to notice too much of a difference, I think it did help improve full auto fire at longer ranges. But in any case it definitely didn’t feel bad so going to keep using it. Interesting you came across this because I’ve always thought this was such a said and forget setting because no one understood it 😂 (Yousken btw)

@SilkOCE

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah definitely should help at longer ranges because the chance you'll have to make larger flicks decreases as the targets get further.

Silk great upload. I'm going to adjust my settings today. I watch alot of tips and tricks uploads for bf5 and this is the 1st i have heard of this. Many thanks and if it helps me I'll definitely not let my platoon members know lol. Stay safe, Pete

@SilkOCE

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks for checking it out. I've had really good results with this and I'm confident it'll help you too

Placebo effect in the works! 😀👍 Silk, your information is misleading. Refer to “Important Guide to Uniform Soldier Aiming” on BF4 forum and “Uniform Soldier Aiming ...on or off?” on BF1 forum. On the second topic go to page 2 and read TheNoobPolice’s comment who “helped test and develop the maths behind this when Dark Etheeral, DICE dev Julian Manolov and a few other contributers developed it during BF4 CTE”. At 1:45 your explanation is wrong. Here are some quotes I’ve saved two years ago about USA: “133% coefficient is the same as 75% monitor distance in 16:9, and means that movement to 75% between the crosshair and the edge of the monitor is matched between scopes and aims. It is coming from 4:3 indeed, where 133% coefficient is the same as 100% monitor distance.” “You may have thought "Hmm, if a coefficient of 1.33 corresponds to the width of a 4:3 screen, shouldn't I change it to match my widescreen's aspect ratio?" (example 178% for 16:9) The answer is no. It will probably feel funny.” “Since you are very rarely snapping to target right at the edge of your monitor, a 178% coefficient will likely make high zoom scopes feel too fast during the majority of your aiming relative to hipfire on a 16:9 screen.” “Having the coefficient setting at 0% matches the velocity of the mouse movement to the speed of images moving that are right underneath your crosshair at any zoom level. This looked fool-proof and simple on paper, but it became apparent as zoom increased with sniper scopes that they felt too slow. This was initially baffling, but we (developers) realised our brains don't give us a sensitivity sensation based on one part of the screen, rather an average across the screen, and this might be different for different people. “Some very smart people have created the USA formula, the default of 4/3 (133%) is there for a reason and we (developers) were all aware that most people are playing on 16:9 screen. What you choose as a coefficient is more a personal preference however, there is no right or wrong.” End of quotes. By the way I call this placebo because on all of your clips you use x1 zoom level where the difference between 0% coefficient and 133% is 0.1cm (if you use for example 30cm/360° hipfire). For 50cm/360° the difference will be 0.2cm. I was fooled by it too. Believe me I’ve used 0% UsA for years and it was a mistake. It slows down high zoom weapons too much. My advice: leave coefficient at 133% and tweak “soldier zoom sensitivity”. Especially for x1 zoom (ADS FoV on). Just experiment, start at 50% and slowly by 5% work your way up to 100%, then from 100% to 50% and you’ll narrow it down to the “best sensitivity”. You will be surprised how much more accurate and consistent you can be with lower values. You don’t really need ninja flicks for BFV. And even if you do just increase your hipfire sens.

@SilkOCE

3 жыл бұрын

I appreciate the criticism and while this may support 133% being better than I gave it credit for, the very post you are referencing shows how arbitrary the value is. "So you must be wondering why the default coefficient is 1.33 First, because 1.33 seemed to work best, second, because that's what CS:GO used and compatability is awesome, and third, because when you times your vertical screen height by 1.33, you would get your horizontal screen width if you were using a 4:3 screen, which is the smallest aspect ration screen people use for games." While the clips I showed were all 1x zoom. I use the G43 often and it feels much better with 0%. And none of this changes that you are calibrating your sensitivity to be accurate at one specific range. It's a shortcut to better aim but all of what I said about the actual focal length scaling process holds true.

@TheZodh

3 жыл бұрын

>> the very post you are referencing shows how arbitrary the value is. Actually it’s not that simple. I’ll explain below... >> While the clips I showed were all 1x zoom. I use the G43 often and it feels much better with 0%. I’m sorry if I didn’t hear you mentioning that but then this footage of 1X is confusing. This simply means that you prefer a slower ads sens which can be achieved with soldier zoom sens (by the way it’s 77% for 3X scope and 74% for 6X scope with 133% coefficient to match your 0% coefficient and 100% szs). The difference is - it will not mess up other zoom levels (example below). It’s almost the same as saying “hey folks my secret is a lower ads sens”. >> you are calibrating your sensitivity to be accurate at one specific range. It's a shortcut to better aim but all of what I said about the actual focal length scaling process holds true. It's not more of a shortcut than changing soldier zoom sens to 77% (actually one less tab to navigate 😉). Key aspect of 133% is a “consistency between zoom levels”. With 0% every next zoom level will feel slower and slower (4X is exactly twice slower than 2X and so on) which is not consistent at all as it may seem on paper especially with higher zoom levels. Try BF1 10X or BF4 40X scopes. With 30cm/360° hipfire the difference between 0% coefficient and 133% for even 10X scope will be about 37cm (that’s almost the size of my mousepad) . So if you like slower sens and 0% UsA is exactly what it means because 1X is not even affected unless you turn off ads fov, then just lower soldier zoom sens and it will feel more consistent with every other zoom level. Silk, I respect you, I'm your long time sub, but c'mon man, you have 16.5k subs, please don't spread misinformation, topic is very big and exciting, do your research before posting 🧐 cheers!

@SilkOCE

3 жыл бұрын

@@TheZodh it's not just the slower sens, you actually described the exact thing I like about 0% USA. "Key aspect of 133% is a “consistency between zoom levels”. With 0% every next zoom level will feel slower and slower (4X is exactly twice slower than 2X and so on) which is not consistent at all as it may seem on paper especially with higher zoom levels." The reason why you can judge distances properly with 0% is because the distance scales with the zoom. If you zoom in 2x, the target will be 2x further away on your screen, and will require 2x more mouse movement to flick to compared to before the zoom. If you make this a fair comparison and scale the distance between you and the target to counteract the zoom, then the mouse distances will be the same. This will also benefit tracking, since the perceived movement speed, size, and distance of the movement will scale with the zoom, and so will the sensitivity. So if the distance between you and the target scales with the zoom also, then a target will move the same speed across your screen, and require the exact same mouse movement. And there is no need for comments like "do your research before posting 🧐 cheers!" We can discuss this but there's no need to be condescending, especially when you're not fully understanding the mechanics that you're talking about.

Best reason to use 0% is that most of bf and cod games the action is around your crosshair and 0% does that the best,also tracking with 0% on different zoom levels feel somewhat the same( or more logical to your brain) cheers!

I just bought Battlefield V through Steam sales and I haven't played since BF3. Holy hell did I suck, I was like what is going on, has it been that long? Do I really suck this much? I went from 5 kills in a game to 20 after changing to this system, I have no idea what you were saying, but it has helped my game play, so thank you!

Man you are a gamelife savior. Huge difference even in bf1

For you to be back you must be done with your college semester lol. Welcome back.

@SilkOCE

3 жыл бұрын

You know it :D

Or the no recoil "cheat" by turning your ads fov on.

@SilkOCE

3 жыл бұрын

Speed hacks by using high FOV too

Beautiful Job mate emphasizing that only one flick distance will be one-to-one, so important that people get that.

don t midn me saving the link to this vid, as soon as i m home ima check this out

If using 4:3 display - coef. @ 133, battlefield assumes this by default If using 16:9 display - coef. @ 178 Also given they are assuming you use a 4:3 display if you want 90° FOV it actually needs to be set up at 74° (59 on slider I believe) to actually get 90. Otherwise you'll have 110. Check it with the compass in game, it confirms

I absolutely destroyed the enemies like that with my mate today, thx for that 👍🏻

@SilkOCE

3 жыл бұрын

Glad I could help

Ive been playing wrong for years.... cheers mate.

Dude, it helped me alot, thank you so much!

Nice vid Sii! I will try it out right now on my Ps and give you the result

@SilkOCE

3 жыл бұрын

On playstation it might not be as good it's more of a PC thing

TBH I watched 3 times even drop the video play speed but still dont understand.

I'm gonna try this for a week, if my aim is better ill come back and give you a kiss, ill keep this comment updated.

@SilkOCE

3 жыл бұрын

Roger that I'll keep an eye out

@x8reaps

3 жыл бұрын

@@SilkOCE It works really well if ur swapping between different scopes, helps them all feel the same so defs recommend

@SilkOCE

3 жыл бұрын

@@x8reaps appreciate the testing and feedback

@nabor1708

3 жыл бұрын

did yall kiss?

Great video! I’ll be giving this a go for sure!

@SilkOCE

3 жыл бұрын

It definitely helped me, keen to hear your thoughts

@nade_aus

3 жыл бұрын

@@SilkOCE I'll try it out for a few weeks and let you know!

Thanks this helped a lot so I subbed

@SilkOCE

3 жыл бұрын

Glad it helped

It’s nice to see you again hope your doing well

@SilkOCE

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah I'm good man!

Wow this helped tremendously! I am playing on the Series X. Headshots for days.

@ezblvck

3 жыл бұрын

Really? the same configuration? I have play 4

@philaufan6

3 жыл бұрын

@@ezblvck Yeah it helps with sniping alot.

Yes ur back!!

You were right about most players not knowing how it works, I was one of them. At first, after fidgeting with uniform aiming a bit, I disabled it and went with just the 100% soldier zoom aim. After watching your video, I now know 0% finally gives me that visuo-motor alignment with hipfire that I've always wanted. I've noticed that only in BFs, my ADS sensitivity seemed to feel unusually low even with 1x optics and 100% soldier zoom, so I struggled at close range if I wasn't within hipfiring distance. I still don't know what 100% would do. With a bit of practice, I should be able to stop overshooting targets from being used to my old settings and quickly further improve my aim in BF4/BFV.

New sub, looking forward to future content. Keep it up 👍

What is a “flick”? PC only?

Thanks a lot!

Thumbs up for no intro! just straight to the point!

I was sceptic but tried this today. I can confirm it works! 😵

@SilkOCE

3 жыл бұрын

Glad you're already seeing results. It's the best mode for developing muscle memory

@gopaul

3 жыл бұрын

@@SilkOCE I come from CS so this helps

I am confused. My hipfire rotations/360 is about 7 inches. With uniform aiming on and coeff set to 0, my ads aiming (with 1.5x ironsights) is about 11 in. I thought the idea was to bring it closer to 1:1? All other settings left default, zoomed sensitivity set to 100%

The way I see it is indirectly improving aim at 1x (main) by enabling a better or proportionate sens to that at other zooms

thank you for this video are these settings effective on xbox one?

A lot of players are using 1.78 in Warzone.... I am having a hard time choosing between 1.78 and 0.... 1.33 is awfull, im so happy Im over that

Silk; brilliant. I mostly run as a medic and with 0 coefficient and 90 field of view i now have zero recoil on the Thompson and ZK. Thanks for the tip. My aim is also way better. Stay safe Pete

@SilkOCE

3 жыл бұрын

Wow those are good results! Have fun Pete :D

They're even killing me in plane now with high damage and killing me but my plane is alive. Next level hacking going on in Asian server... OOO Man.

And they laughed at me on reddit when I tried to enlighten them...

@mm-rw3hi

3 жыл бұрын

There are actually far too many guys running around using 360 distance for ads. Actually terrifying

thanks man, ive been trying for approx 24 hours and ive definately noticed 25%better results for hip fire

@GoldenEagle0007

2 жыл бұрын

this setting does literally nothing for hip fire, FACEPALM

I don’t even know why am watching these videos my issues with my fucking Wi-Fi

@keeganfritz1141

3 жыл бұрын

I get 1.4 speed 🤬

I thought increasing it would make higher zoomed scoped sensitivity higher. So I changed my coefficient to 150% 😂 now I'm wondering if it actually is a hindrance

@lamehick7511

3 жыл бұрын

There is a seperate setting for each magnification in the options menu...

@TyJG

3 жыл бұрын

@@lamehick7511 no shit. I'm on about what it says in the description of coefficient

Tbh I tried 0% when I first started, in the end I've set it to 177.8% and it feels much better

@SilkOCE

3 жыл бұрын

Fair enough, it's whatever you feel most comfortable on.

omg i use 177% xD i will try 0 now ty silk and welcome back bro

@SilkOCE

3 жыл бұрын

Have fun

this greatly improves my recoil control... but its a lot harder to actually hit the enemy because of how inaccurate i am now

@IIHydraII

2 жыл бұрын

Lower your sens if you have trouble tracking

I tried it in combine arms and 🔥🔥🔥 Thanks 🌹❤

coefficient doesnt do sht on 1x scopes tho. you can set it to 0 or 300 and it would feel the same.. this is more true for 3x scopes tho

I just got this game for cheap and the aim feels TERRIBLE! I'll try these but damn I didn't know BF had such wacky aim on controller

@SilkOCE

3 жыл бұрын

Oh on controller it might be different this is mainly for PC. Worth a try though!

@IIHydraII

3 жыл бұрын

The aim mechanics are great in this game on controller, just not the default settings, they’re waaay too slow.

interesting, I will be trying this.

@SilkOCE

3 жыл бұрын

If you run ADS FOV on it'll be hard to feel the difference. The main advantage is using SLRs and other weapons with >1x zoom

@SilkOCE

3 жыл бұрын

Very interested to hear your thoughts given your skill and experience though

0:33 mans shot 3 times out of 31 and reloaded

I was using 178% I felt it was better for me

@SilkOCE

3 жыл бұрын

Aye if it works it works. Just providing info on how this setting actually behaves so people can make an informed choice

@DonJon99

3 жыл бұрын

@@SilkOCE Yeah I like, you make me want to try 0% coefficent

thanks man

whats your DPI ?

I just found ur video, and agree with u. i always used 0 tho (in other games) since i didnt understand after changing and testing what was the difference and a value like 133 was makin no sense for me. but now that u explained, thats clear. thx... One question THO : why do u said that Zoom sens must be on 100%? cuz im used to 70% zoom sens ....... is that bad ? (i mean, is that better usin same sens?)

well I cannot everything but I see your setting and made same my setting it's not perfect but fine than before Thenks ❤

Sweet ill try it

yeah the guy on 03:30 is the best AimBoter in the world!

wow this works on console too...im blown away

But it doesnt improve my Aim at all, if i Zoom in now with a 4x Scope, then i cant flick nor hit anyone near me in close Combat, cause it is now sooooo slow. Hipfire and Scoped "flicking" also does not feel anything near the same, its just slower then on 133 or 178, i hate it, lol. Its much better on 178 tho, can now Quick Scope People across the Map now easily. Maybe i dont get the Point youre making, maybe thats the reason, idk.

doesn't really work for me for snipers as its not 1:1 at all at higher zoom levels

stupid question, the uniform soldier aiming and coefficient settings that you showed here do they also apply in BF1 Too?

Zoom ADS FOV: ON OU OFF with 0% uniform solder

Hang on, what does setting the coefficient to 0 do? I have mine set to 1.6 because my resolution is 1680x1050 and 1050x1.6 is 1680. And a thread I saw somewhere said this was the calculation to make. So what does 0% do different? Does it not just remove the effect?

@robbiepna1939

2 жыл бұрын

Im confusion too

What mapwhat mode was in the begining of the video.

Can you explain why this doesnt work on controller? My aim is very acceptable on bf5 console ( you can check this account, i uplaod my highlights (or nooblights as i like to call) and im currently using 125% on zoom soldier, uniform aim is on, but the coeficient is at 140. All my sensitives but the plane is at 100%. Should i try this? I mean, only tunning the coefient to 0 using my current settings?

@SilkOCE

3 жыл бұрын

It might work on controller, but on controller the analog input works differently from mouse I think? Like on controller, you hold an input for a certain amount of time, wheras on PC our aim always corresponds to the same distance. Could still be worth a try though, You never know until you try it. I didn't break out the math in this video but by changing the value to zero, a different equation is used because it would have broken the original one due to division by zero errors.

@Rafstrike_e

3 жыл бұрын

@@SilkOCE IT FOCKING WORKED, SILK YOU'RE GOD Exagerations aside, it worked beautifully, but i had to change my 3 and 6x from 100% to 125% (as the soldier zoom value) cause i was way more confortable. But it so fucking precise, but you need to turn aim assist off, which for me, is not that big of deal, i play without since mw3, but in this game i was in need for the aim assist cause i couldn' fix my aim. Well, who would know that a simple number could make a big difference. Anyway, thank for the video, it helped a ton

@laurence2013

3 жыл бұрын

I've always played around half zoom sens to soldier sens on controller and have had better aim since turning on to 133%, but this is not something on controller that I think is very noticeable. If setting zoom to 100% is necessary, that's very impractical for high soldier sens on controller because that zoom sens will scale terribly and be too fast. Will try 0% USA on 48% zoom just to test.

If coeff just increases zoom sensitivity based 1X then why not just use 100%

@timer42s_83

3 жыл бұрын

I use 100% on bf4, and it feels really good

what is your in game FOV?? 105?? And what's your dpi??

guy called you a hacker in chat lol

How did u set 6.3 % in the options in the battlefield :O

@mickey_jim2770

2 жыл бұрын

left and right arrow keys

@sikimasio

2 жыл бұрын

@@mickey_jim2770 Oh god, why I didnt know about this earlier

Man, do we have bad news from the future regarding "Battlefield 6"

Sorry if already answered but is this relevant to console?

Anyone else here because they’re making the transition to KBAM?

I've tested both USA off and other values. Personally I don't see a difference tbh.

@SilkOCE

3 жыл бұрын

Are you mainly testing with 1x scopes. The entire USA formula depends on a change in FOV, and at 1x there is no real change. It's more noticeable with 3x.

one click zoom on sniper how?

yh im much better with 178% coeff, and adjusted scope sensitivities.

Hey man how are you? Just wondering. The first map you were playing was in the dark. What mode or game is thisv

How do you change your controller settings on pc like all it says is mouse sensitivity no controller sensitivity can someone please help and let me know on how to

so let me get this strait am very stupid the usa makes all zooms the same sensitivity but the coefficient is the sensitivity at hight soom range the less % coefficient the less sensitivity it is at zoom lets say 6x scope is that right

Do you still use 0 coefficient on all games?

How come if i use a Sens converter and i convert from Apex legends 2.2 to Battlefield V it says my Sens should be 0.0160 How do i even set this in game?

Changing slider = Cheating. Thought you were better than this Silk

@SilkOCE

3 жыл бұрын

Sorry but my aim was trash for long enough :/

@Rafstrike_e

3 жыл бұрын

@@SilkOCE (Y) S ame

So does this convert to COD as well? no 1.33 or 1.78 but set it to zero?

@SilkOCE

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah same on cod, use 0. I had a 5 k/d on Warzone and used VLK on the M13 and that sens scaling felt awesome

Just got Bfv on pc and recoil is ridiculous to control, watching your gameplay make me think how you have 0 recoil on strumgewer? any trick to control recoil? and no FOV dont help controlling recoil i tried 90 and 95

Those MPControlWard clips, jesus fucking christ...

what about dpi and ingame sens?

@SilkOCE

3 жыл бұрын

I use 800 dpi and 6.3% but that's more of a preference

Cool video, but the frame drops make this feel unwatchable

@SilkOCE

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah my recording settings were fucked back then it's better now

Hey bro, what DPI setting is your mouse? 800?

Hello bro, How did get that gun. Is that a part of upgrade?

Just a heads up for anyone using the coefficient. The optimal Values the more common monitor formats are as follows. 4:3 = 133,3% 16:9 = 177,7% 21:9 = 233,3%

@SilkOCE

3 жыл бұрын

4/3 = 133% lmao people think they cracked the code with this but it makes zero sense at all when you understand what monitor distance is. Don't spread misinformation pls

So i can turn it off on console? I've played with that on since launh

How can the map has night situation?

when did gaming become this grindy? Sice warzone came up in like 2019 a can't play literally any fps games because of the sweat players that feel like cheaters. Kills the enjoyment for me.

Best aimer on the world is Relaaa, bro

Does that mean that setting it to 0% is the same as the "Legacy" aiming option in COD MW/Warzone?

@SilkOCE

3 жыл бұрын

I think it's supposed to be but to my understanding, "Legacy" is broken and this 0% is the same as using "Relative" and 0%

@mm-rw3hi

3 жыл бұрын

@@SilkOCE legacy locks you fov to 65fov 4:3hdeg which will feel weird maot of the time relative - 0.000coefficient - independent fov Works best to match other games /battlefield /apex

Does this also work for bf4 and 1?

@Svensson81

2 жыл бұрын

Absolutely.

Are these settings for only pc?

@SilkOCE

3 жыл бұрын

Haven't tested on console, you'd have to try