seeing all the comments that are against space exploration make me sad. There is so much medial technology, communication, advanced materials, and transportation technology that was made possible by the Apollo missions in the 1960s. We innovate through competition, and people still want to turn away from space. Imagine all that we could develop and discover through exploration of Mars, and imagine the peaceful competition it would enable through competition with China, instead of turning our resources to war. Mars is the most exciting opportunity this century, and people still try to turn it into billionaires vs us argument. I for one am excited to see NASA work towards mars missions in the 2030s, GO NASA!

@dotnet97

Жыл бұрын

It's just further evidence that most people don't deserve the comforts they enjoy.

@iamBlackGambit

Жыл бұрын

It's just not feasible! 🤷🏾‍♂️ and we are not ment to live on mars, God created us for the EARTH! That's it

@Zurround

Жыл бұрын

Then there are the G0dd@mn @$$H0L3$ who think human space exploration is "unnecessary" because we can just send "robots" NO. The human race has an obligation to go to these places. It is NOT satisfactory to ONLY rely on robots.

@rickhenkle7778

Жыл бұрын

Need to Take Care of Our Planet First!! Otherwise we will be just a Virus to whatever we find out there!! True!!

@tylerclayton6081

Жыл бұрын

@@iamBlackGambit God doesn’t exist. 😂 Imagine still believing in a god in the 21st century

A lot of people don’t realize that the space race is the reason why we have so much new technology that has changed the lives of everyone on earth for the better. Without time periods like the Industrial Revolution , space race, etc our world would look so much different and probably not in a good way . We would probably have no medical imaging techniques, durable healthcare equipment, artificial limbs, water filtration systems, solar panels, firefighting equipment, shock absorbers, air purifiers, home insulation, weather resistant airplanes, infrared thermometers, etc

@CooBlu20

Жыл бұрын

I was going to comment something similar! So much revolutionary tech birthed from the space division. I wish more people could see all the positives out of it...

@justinratcliffe947

Жыл бұрын

These anti-space fools will one day suffer the humiliation of being proven dead wrong

@aliensoup2420

Жыл бұрын

People don't realize how much technology we take for granted in our everyday lives is a product of warfare.

@dentonfender6492

Жыл бұрын

@@aliensoup2420 Just think how much more technology would exist if our focus was pure research with the goal of advancing into space, and exploration of the solar system instead of new ways to annihilate ourselves into oblivion along with this beautiful planet.

@tnez2009

Жыл бұрын

Dang 😮… that’s a lot of stuff !!

With changes in the economy leading to instability in the stock market, some individuals may face a decrease in their investments in an effort to benefit from the current market conditions, I am considering liquidating my $725k portfolio consisting of bonds and stocks. Someone else in the same situation? Please tell me in the comments!..

@Kurt5Dobson

Жыл бұрын

would suggest you thoroughly evaluate the companies you have invested in and their estimated future performance, as we may expect to see the market decline further. To minimize stress and improve efficiency, it might be wise to seek the assistance of an investment advisor to help restructure your portfolio and identify any underperforming investments to offset. This approach has been successful for me and has reduced my stress levels.

@AllisonSherman7

Жыл бұрын

I have been exploring the possibility of utilizing advisors to help navigate the stock market during these uncertain times. However, I am still evaluating their potential effectiveness in providing the support I need. @@Kurt5Dobson

@Kurt5Dobson

Жыл бұрын

Christy Vallen D'souza is an esteemed coach known for her proficiency in her area of expertise. You probably might have come across her. I found her on a CNBC interview where she was featured and i reached out to her afterwards. She has since provided entry and exit points on the securities I focus on. You can carry out a quick internet research on her name for more info. I basically follow her market moves and haven’t regretted doing so... @@AllisonSherman7

@AllisonSherman7

Жыл бұрын

I was considering changing my investment strategy and planning to sell certain positions. As my retirement is coming soon,I became increasingly stressed. After thoroughly researching Christy Vallen D'souza on internet, I concluded that I had made an informed decision. Thank you for this Pointer. She seems very proficient and flexible. I booked a call session with her too. @@Kurt5Dobson

@dougtheslug6435

4 ай бұрын

Lol.......let me guess your friend Christy Vallen D'souza will recommend crypto to diversify your portfolio.

If we loose the desire to explore, we have lost our humanity.

@jasonsu8468

Жыл бұрын

We’re losing people here. right now my guy ….

@goddyfame3424

5 күн бұрын

Exploration is a given. The Chinese don't have a large enough rocket to put every aspect of a Mars mission in it. But it does have enough Rockets to do them separately. But then, China is not in a race.

The difference between going to the moon and going to Mars is like the difference between going to the convenience store on the corner and doing a cross country road trip, but in space.

@wordwarrior2350

Жыл бұрын

Try this. We can get to the Moon and back in less than a week. The roundtrip to Mars would be at leat 2+ years, if the people could have food and water for that time, and not get sick.

@arealperson641

Жыл бұрын

It’s less likely that you get shot on a road trip though.

@24AK

Жыл бұрын

@@wordwarrior2350 it's not a problem. 5 people * 10 liter a day * 730 days = 36,5 tons of water. 1 space ship can easily carry 100 tons to mars. (ofc you don't need that much water, because 80% of the water will be recycled.)

@wordwarrior2350

Жыл бұрын

@@24AK Please think of it this way: You can´t even write a proper sentence with a capital letter at the beginning, the proper use of commas, and a period at the end, but you are a Mars, (With a small "m".), expert. By the way the round trip would take more like three years and there are other things like food and exposure to possible diseases, Etc. Did you volunteer? I doubt it. You have to get a HS diploma first, right?

@wordwarrior2350

Жыл бұрын

@@arealperson641 Where did you get that information? Maybe if the road trip is through South America or Africa. Please try to get your facts straight. I would much rather drive from El Paso to Argentina than blast off on a rocket for a R/T to Mars. Ask an expert for the real figures. Give them my example. By the way, I can carry guns and bodyguards, actually two good looking women who love me, with bullet proof vests to Argentina and buy a bullet proof car. add that in Genius. NASA will prepare the way they do, so I can prepare the way I want to, right?

What do you think Optimus is for? Send robots to mars to build the habitats and life support before man goes to mars.

@MrMadbrowncow

Жыл бұрын

Optimus prime. 🤣

@Batman-vr6jp

Жыл бұрын

It needs to work first..... Stop dreaming

@richbl1690

Жыл бұрын

@@Batman-vr6jp this just the beginning or beta stage

@richbl1690

Жыл бұрын

If spaceX can land a 100 foot lawn dart from space on a platform in the middle of Oceane, don't you think they can make robots that can make mars possible?

@shacktime

Жыл бұрын

That’s a much better plan but given how little atmosphere and gravitation Mars has people simply won’t be able to survive there. No magnetosphere, either.

I would be incredibly excited to see a human on mars. i am jealous of my parents and grandparents who got to experience the moon mission. I feel like it would be amazing to observe that.

@chikapunk4340

Жыл бұрын

Give it till 2030 people will be on mars probably

@shacktime

Жыл бұрын

You think it would be amazing to watch humanity’s best and brightest die horrifically slow and painful deaths?

@shacktime

Жыл бұрын

@@chikapunk4340No, they won’t.

@chikapunk4340

Жыл бұрын

@@shacktime why don’t you think so

@mymixedbiscuit9159

Жыл бұрын

Oh, I don't think you should envy them lol. I mean, c'mon, sure they got some cool moon landings but they got them in incredibly poor quality - plus, for 50 years, they never did it again. Also, you can observe that!! Artemis 3 is landing on the moon in 2025, sending 2 humans to the surface.

60 years later,we learn about it. And in another 60 years,we'll hear about the Starship Enterprise.😊

@mrplease66

Жыл бұрын

maybe you just learnt about it, but we learnt about Nerva in highschool in the 90s. It really wasn't a secret

@shacktime

Жыл бұрын

Zero chance of that.

@Mrcaton..

Жыл бұрын

Space Shuttle Enterprise: 🗿

Our true purpose is to reach for the stars. The human race must become multi-planetary. We'll also adapt to space in a 100 years.

@ClockMaster_3100

Жыл бұрын

true. evolution can be very fast sometimes. Doesn't always take millions of years to do it

@Bitchslapper316

Жыл бұрын

@@ClockMaster_3100 Yep it can happen fast. There was a documented case this century when scientists were able to observe a new species of bird evolve. I imagine is a baby is born and raised in space or on mars it will have minor adaptations that make it better suited to survive there. When those people reproduce their offspring will have even more.

@messytenzo6838

Жыл бұрын

@@Bitchslapper316 just look at the astronauts on the space station and how they change up there

@ClockMaster_3100

Жыл бұрын

@@Bitchslapper316 yea the only unfortunate side of that is that person would never be able to visit earth or any high gravity world because their bodies would be adapted to a low gravity environment. Well unless they can condition themselves

@Ben-Ken

Жыл бұрын

I agree. I don't believe we can just randomly go back and forth to different planets for long periods. We will mostly stay in the place we are adapted to live in. Martians may become a different species. We may even use science to change human DNA for life in space. It's illegal now but if China starts colonizing space with enhanced people, you better believe the US will follow suit to not get left behind.

Space X is in the lead, and I don’t think there is competition.

@rickjames18

Жыл бұрын

Imagine how much more Musk could do if the Biden admin wasn't trying to ruin the guy due to a difference of opinions.

@glenncordova4027

Жыл бұрын

SpaceX is in the lead but the race isn't over. There is the moon, then Mars then martian colony. All are difficult. All are a competition. When this is done, there will be new races

@rebelcrusader9973

Жыл бұрын

Considering the amount of problems their raptor engines have, they are leading the back of the line. Every single milestone date they presented has failed.

@rickjames18

Жыл бұрын

@@rebelcrusader9973 What? no one comes close to Space X. Have you looked into the process they use? Not sure how they are leading the back when literally everyone even Chinese companies are just copying Elon's ideas.

@lordtyrant420

Жыл бұрын

​@Rebel Crusader He has high hopes, they are still doing a ton and having success. Raptors are getting better and most are not the newest models same as the ship. Give it some time, rockets are hard. Look at all the success Falcon has

This seems more about US vs Them than. Science.

WE WILL NEVER LIVE IN PEACE AMOUNG THE STARS UNTIL WE LEARN TO LIVE IN PEACE HERE ON EARTH...

@Space_Rebel

Жыл бұрын

Hmmm 🤔

@IvanPlayStation4LiFe

Жыл бұрын

Among

3:30 - "Only the US, Russia, and China have successfully landed robotic rovers." Incorrect. Two Russian robotic rovers may have reached the surface of Mars in 1971 during the Soviet Mars 2 and 3 missions, but neither vehicle completed its mission. Mars 2 crash-landed on the planet (rover destroyed), and Mars 3 ceased transmissions 20 seconds after landing (Rover never deployed). Neither of these can be called "successful".

@xiangyuanpeng8120

Жыл бұрын

the us public simply won't have the sustained support for space exploration unless they say China and/or Russia is also doing it (better when both are doing or have done it). Twisting the truth a little bit is a small price to pay.

@ianbruce9603

Жыл бұрын

@@xiangyuanpeng8120 That's very true - they come right out and say it in this NBC report. We would not have made it to the Moon if were not in a race with Russia. Now it's Mars, and we're in a much friendlier competition with China - but it's still a race. The US has experience, but China is a technological and manufacturing powerhouse, and is gaining rapidly. China expects to walk on the Moon by 2030. The next 10 years are going to be exciting times - US and China moonbases first, and then on to Mars.

@raifikarj6698

Жыл бұрын

​​​@@ianbruce9603 there is news recently coming out from SCMP china already in production in factory for their EXPENDABLE rocket to Catch up of SpaceX Reusable rocket capacity and building their own Constellation. So they already planned to make 52 rocket in a year. Mind you they are not reusable so it had higher cost and it seems China can afford that and their Reusable rocket technology was still in development so probably the reason for the factory meanwhile the building the Reusable Technology.

@Emilechen

Жыл бұрын

very professional comment,

@MaxScooterfan

Жыл бұрын

Russians had successful missions to Venus!

anyone remember "Orion", The building sized spaceship that was going to fire mini nukes out the back end and detonate them to impart force onto a plate that would then push the craft forward?

@Bitchslapper316

Жыл бұрын

Yeah. They interviewed the son of the main scientist on that project and he claimed a different reason it was canceled. He said they developed a way to make cheap nukes very easily and they were afraid that tech would leak out. If true I'm guessing that is the reason fusion energy went from "10 years away" to 60+ and counting. The issue with fusion is creating the environment to start the reaction, the scientists at the time envisioned using mini atom bombs to create the reaction. That seems to have been taken away as an option.

@keurikeuri7851

Жыл бұрын

I saw that being used before in the docu movie Evacuate Earth.

Some things are about more than what we might physically be able to see in OUR lifetime. I *may* personally never benefit from any of this, but I think it’s important, it’s cool, and seeing it makes the inner nerd in me happy.

Good job NBC. A rare example of high integrity journalism covering the mostly successful SpaceX test, when I thought that wasn't a thing any more.

@bestkickz2464

Жыл бұрын

Lol why do you all buy this nonsense? They’ve been telling us we would be taking rocket taxis to space in 2012. They are lyinggggg. Every year they say ‘we are 15 years away’

@tatata1543

Жыл бұрын

Mostly successful😂. That “mostly” is doing serious lifting.

@Seehart

Жыл бұрын

@@tatata1543 nah. Primary goal as stated was to clear the launch pad, and then learn from whatever happens next. That happened successfully. Nobody involved thought of it as a failure, other than a bit more damage to the launch pad than expected. But then the plans for a better launch pad were already in the works.

@tatata1543

Жыл бұрын

@@Seehart The launchpad was wrecked, they tried and failed to blow the rocket up after it went completely out of control soon after launch and now both the FAA and Spacex are being taken to court. Characterizing that as a “success” is Musk levels of spin. Ignore all the fanboys cheering like idiots and have a look at Musk’s reaction when it eventually blew up, that’s not the reaction of a guy looking at success.

@stevenharris2064

Жыл бұрын

Actual journalism, what a concept

why does the media keep characterizing the first flight of Starship a failure? They seem to have no clue that real rocket development proceeds step by step with rapid iterations, including failures. You need to push the envelop to succeed.

@Abbadon3232

Жыл бұрын

True, the Starship test was a unqualified success. A failure would have been a big explosion on the launch pad.

@rickjames18

Жыл бұрын

They are still mad he bought Twitter and stopped the censorship of Americans. The left doesn't like Elon because he believe in free speech. Super weird how that works and how they try to make him out to be some crazy MAGA shill. Nothing wrong with MAGA but he isn't a republican last time I checked.

We should be exploring Uranus right now

@tonynunez6539

Жыл бұрын

Uranus has been deeply probed.

@sweetmapleleafs

Жыл бұрын

We cant just push a rocket deep in Uranus.

@orionSpacecraft

Жыл бұрын

at this rate, we are not gonna see the manned exploration of the outer solar system until the late 21st century

When first humans land on Mars,it will be incredibly uplifting for the entire human race. Might even encourage us to cooperate more instead of fight with our petty little differences. Space exploration needs the resources of ALL of the people on the Earth. We all need to unite.

@ClockMaster_3100

10 ай бұрын

I know our species needs something to rally around

@lazarusblackwell6988

10 ай бұрын

@@ClockMaster_3100 Thanks for the reply man.I agree.

Glad to be alive to see this! ✊🏻

"We are running out of space and the only places to go to are other worlds. It is time to explore other solar systems. Spreading out may be the only thing that saves us from ourselves. I am convinced that humans need to leave Earth." Stephen Hawking

@eabutler6861

Жыл бұрын

we arent running out of space, colonizing deserts, under the oceans and the poles would be easier than living in space......such an ignorant quote.

@justinratcliffe947

Жыл бұрын

@@eabutler6861 Are you Stephen Hawking? I don't think so

@jasondrummond9451

Жыл бұрын

@@justinratcliffe947 On Earth, ALL our eggs, literally, are in one basket - one KT sized asteroid (or nuclear war) away from extinction. The more we spread out, the greater our chance of surviving as a species. If the West gives up on Space - we can live under the thumb of the Chinese military space stations and lunar station, trapped on earth in a dystopian hellscape.

@vkermodekumav8949

Жыл бұрын

​@@justinratcliffe947 it was a quote dude... Like seriously... No one should have to say that to you. Lol

@canadiangemstones7636

Жыл бұрын

Running out of space? 😂😂😂 Drive across Canada ffs. We got space.

So, my great, great, great grandson might come to earth for a vacation, if it's still here and livable.

@w1ndgeneral226

Жыл бұрын

Hopefully it will be.

@eabutler6861

Жыл бұрын

earth will always be more livable than mars.

@kenhoward3512

Жыл бұрын

Or, by then, he might say, "Earth? What a sh-thole!" (actor Ron Pearlman's line in the last "Aliens" movie).

@sidstevens9035

Жыл бұрын

A negative greeny no doubt ? So sad !

I was 12 years old when Neil Armstrong took that step into history. It was 9:50 P.M. CDT

If humanity is able to successfully land on Mars it will be the start of a new era which is the exploration of space and colonizing new planets

I want a For All Mankind Timeline!!!

@nickolaiproblem

Жыл бұрын

Bro that writers room called it

@anthonygordon9483

Жыл бұрын

Yeah, my parents lived to see the first man on the moon, I would like to see another small step for mankind in my lifetime. Even if we can colonize the moon. I think Mars is a big leap. I feel if man can feel comfortable with commuting to the moon, it will make it better to go to mars. Cause I really would like to see the moon as a destination for civilization in my lifetime.

@geoffhoutman1557

Жыл бұрын

Way better than the one we got for sure. My little sister is 50 and no one has gone beyond LEO in her lifetime. They making a 4th season of FAM?

I'm not an optimist about the Human Mars mission, but even I think that the 2030ies are a reasonable timeframe for the first manned landing on Mars. Starship is going to be revolutionizing the orbital lift business by then, and that means even a very conventional manned mission is possible. But by 2040 I would think multiple unmanned Starships would reach Mars during every window.

@samr.england613

Жыл бұрын

Btw, SpaceX's "Starships", are simply conventional, liquid-fueled, chemical rockets, that explode quite often.

@joshlewis575

Жыл бұрын

Sure thing, they haven't even launched yet. This is all such a pipe dream. But musk said it so here we are😂😂

@rjswas

Жыл бұрын

@@joshlewis575 What are you on about, you might want to catch up, it launched over a month ago for it's first TEST flight...

@fauxbro1983

Жыл бұрын

lol. Musk is a product of zero % lending. his starships are just a con job.

@nolimitsouldier09

11 ай бұрын

@@rjswasand they still have 5-10 years of engineering challenges to solve. You’re obviously an arm chair aerospace engineer.

Bro, that means i can see the first man to actually go to mars live. Just like when the whole world watched as us humans first land on the moon. This is exciting to see and patiently.

@Andreas-gh6is

Жыл бұрын

It won't be live though because of the light-speed transmission lag and we may not even have the interplanetary data bandwidth to do a livestream. We don't have it right now, certainly.

@lauraalice9081

Жыл бұрын

@@Andreas-gh6is if they gonna do this they gonna have to find away for technology to transmitt that far back to us if not then this iwill be known as a suicidle mission

I can't wait to start my supermarket on Mars .

We need a moon base!

@kenhoward3512

Жыл бұрын

At my age, growing up with the original "space race" with Russia, it's hard to believe we still haven't established a moon base. We've spent the last 50 years stuck in low Earth orbit.

@puresim316nosimracingnolif3

Жыл бұрын

They have moon bases already lads. They are just drip feeding us

@ClockMaster_3100

Жыл бұрын

@@kenhoward3512 what's even more ridiculous is that we have had the technology to build one since the 90s

@Bitchslapper316

Жыл бұрын

@@ClockMaster_3100 Even earlier. The U.S army had their engineers design and lay out the plans for a moon base that would house 20 soldiers and have a garage full of vehicles. The issue was the cost was enormous. It would have taken something like 100 saturn 5 launches.

@messytenzo6838

Жыл бұрын

That’s the plan with Artemis the current program

Spinning up an hollowed out asteroid has the problem that most asteroids would just fly apart from the centrifugal forces. You'd need one that is very solid.

10 years ago we were supposed to be on Mars in 2023 lol

First humans on Mars by 2060??!!?? There will be Chinese restaurants in 30 different places on the planet waiting for us.

@AntonioPerez-zk2mb

Жыл бұрын

You jest now. But you're probably not far off the mark.

@jameswilson5165

Жыл бұрын

@@AntonioPerez-zk2mb Someone needs to start seeing obvious solutions. We need to go to one of the Mars moons FIRST! Set up a base. From there, we can have humans living in a protective area either dug in, or there may be depressions that can be roofed. Once that's done, we send in the Robots to the surface. The distance from Mars's moon to the surface at laser light speed would be fine for the teli-operators living on Phobos.

It’s kinda sad that the only thing that seems to be able to get humans to mars is to do it before other humans. I wish we could do this as one species.

@hawkdsl

Жыл бұрын

It is your nature to be tribal. That will never change.

@TheBestOfSweden

Жыл бұрын

@@hawkdsl that is true

@kylewitzel3873

Жыл бұрын

USA!

@Eren______

Жыл бұрын

Yes, It -although sadly- makes you wish for a conflict for the sake of scientific innovation.

@GodFamilyCountryOfficial

Жыл бұрын

If we ever make contact with another species on a different planet, they won't care if we are Americans, Chinese, Russian or Irish. They will only see us as various types of humans...just as their race may have variations. So yes, to other species on other planets, we are one species. We are the ones who make the separation of various countries.

I am truly excited about this future to come. I hope to live too see all these changes.

0:54 "NASA thinks it can get astronauts, human beings on the M-- on Mars.." 🤣

Forgive me I'm not a Astro physicist, but I've always wondered why NASA doesn't just use robots to prefab a ship yard in orbit. They can use or reuse the rockets to get there and back but the new heavy duty rockets would be at a ship yard in orbit as a midway point

@liloheinrich8659

Жыл бұрын

They haven’t done it yet but they want to! It’s called isam: in-space servicing assembly and manufacturing

@vlogverse6900

Жыл бұрын

For some reason Nasa has a really tight budget

It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that the moon is so much more closer than Mars that it would be stupid to not perfect your interplanetary technology on the closest planet/moon first. It would also take a lot less time to send help if needed. I'd feel much better about my kids having their first camping experience outside in a tent be in the backyard than the next state over.

@perspective8369

Жыл бұрын

Which is why that is the plan. It’s called Artemis

@jwstolk

Жыл бұрын

Any rocket scientist would look at delta-V instead of distance. If you take into account that Mars has a thin atmosphere that can be used to slow down, Earth to Mars only requires a bit more delta-V than Earth to Moon. I agree with sending help is easier when traveling to the Moon, but if you send 10 ships to Mars at the same time, there are 9 that can provide help. And SpaceX is planning to send not 10 but 1000's every time Earth and Mars line up. They won't be alone.

@samr.england613

Жыл бұрын

@@perspective8369 NASA's initial overall plan, anyway. I think we have at least a half or more century of (hopefully, largely scientific) business to do on the Moon, first, before we ever send actual people to Mars.

@samr.england613

Жыл бұрын

@@jwstolk How is it that Mars's very thin atmosphere makes it easier to slow down?

@RestrictedHades

Жыл бұрын

@@samr.england613 the drag slows it down by a lot

Love you chuck, I love space so thank you for a very informative segment,see you Sunday on meet the press 😂 lol

people say "unite and we can do so much together as a species" but competing against each other has proven it'll advance human innovation just for the sake of being better than others. That's what a space race is, competition.

Did he literally ask the lady from NASA what it was and then answer his own question? Yikes

I find two points very interesting about mainstream media. 1. The floor under StarShip was damaged not the whole launchpad As reported! 2. No mention of the staggering cost of SLS or financial sustainability of a disposable rocket, despite the fact that the SLS is built from recycled parts and technologies from the space shuttle. One might be sensing a biased here? Or is it a totally destroy launchpad increases advertising revenue.

15:09 nice interaction. These guys really seem to be close. The human side of news. Love it.

I remember NERVA - K (I’m 70) we could have had this a long time ago Kids.

Is this the behind the scenes special for the new Expanse prequels?

I hate the argument of "we are pouring so much money into space". NASA is working with less than .5% of the total US budget and seems to be able to do more than 95% of government funded programs. Space exploration is the future of humanity and restricting mankind to one planet would be a sin. We spent 2.3 trillion in Afghanistan, a war that only brought death and suffering for no reason. The same budget would be able to fund NASA and space exploration (at 2023's budget of 23 billion) for almost 85 years. Just think of that...

@azeem5471

Жыл бұрын

How is that .5 can you explain?

@BackwardzCap

Жыл бұрын

@@azeem5471 The United States budget is 7 trillion dollars while NASA’s budget is 23 billion.

@jwstolk

Жыл бұрын

Also, the most serious large-scale Mars plans are not from Nasa but from SpaceX, which is paying from it's own pockets (mostly through monthly subscriptions of Starlink customers).

@ms3862

Жыл бұрын

@@jwstolkaceX's Mars plan is stupid and they know it. They can't be serious when they show how to get to mars will require 7 rockets, one to land and 6 to store fuel - all because space x is using 100 year old technology. You want to go to mars you invent new engines that use new fuels that's what space x should be doing, that's what nasa is doing. A nuclear rocket engine can be used to travel back and forth between earth and mars for 20 years and make the trip in half the time, space x requires 7 rockets to get to mars and 3 to get back on each trip. And to do this Space X needs so much fuel that almost all rocket fuel the United stars can manufacture will need to be sent direct to space x

If the foundations of your house are eroding you don't take long journeys for holidays or to examine new places. You focus on your home and manage the harms that affect it before allocating funds and time on other things.

I'd be happy to make a one-way trip to Mars, and we need to get to Mars to start building a new home for our country

@Andreas-gh6is

Жыл бұрын

It would be cheaper and easier to build a bunker habitat on the south pole that would survive virtually anything short of an asteroid directly hitting it.

@nighthawk0077

Жыл бұрын

​@@Andreas-gh6isI agree. Mars is a dead world.

@basketballbicker8933

Жыл бұрын

This is not possible. Even if you built a dome, the quality of life would be terrible.

@Andreas-gh6is

Жыл бұрын

@@basketballbicker8933 still better than anything on Mars. It's way cheaper to bring in construction materials so you can basically construct any kind of building Humans already spend their time in. The sun can even be used as a direct heat source, as well as indirect. Of course, the quality of life may be a little less. Better than no life at all though, and the point of that habitat is to survive when the rest of the Earth is unsurvivable....

@basketballbicker8933

Жыл бұрын

@@Andreas-gh6is I agree. If we have to live in a dead world, better it be one we are already on and have infinite knowledge about.

Mars looks like one big desert

@javierderivero9299

Жыл бұрын

Without oxygen

@KC-ix9mn

Жыл бұрын

It is

@craigb8228

Жыл бұрын

And they haven't even tried living under water yet.

@geraldboykin6159

Жыл бұрын

No Plant Life 🌳

@jayman94fly

Жыл бұрын

The thinking is, That humanity isn't putting all its eggs in one basket so to speak, if something were to happen to earth, Humanity wouldn't go extinct. Super volcano, Nuclear war, War, Pollution, etc

Correction: the only Russian (then Soviet) success was when Mars 3 landed and lasted a few second and the PROP-M crawler launch from M3 is unconfirmed.

@ianbruce9603

Жыл бұрын

Correct. Mars 2 crash-landed on the planet (rover was destroyed), and Mars 3 ceased transmissions 20 seconds after landing (Rover was never deployed). China, however, nailed it on their first mission, so major props to them. Mars ain't easy. Mars eats landers for lunch.

@Michael-it6gb

Жыл бұрын

@@ianbruce9603 China is standing on the shoulders of giants with decades of space advancements from different nations. Mars 3 craft was literally the first to land, give them a break. They had to actually invent this technology.

@ianbruce9603

Жыл бұрын

@@Michael-it6gb I don't disagree with that. And that said, Russia's Venera probes and landers for Venus were an unquestioned and unparalleled success - they just haven't had the same luck with Mars.

Dear NBC please listen to what SpaceX said before the flight. We were not expecting to land it.

@Frank71

Жыл бұрын

I dont think SpaceX were expecting to destroy it in a few minutes.

This was a success we gained so much date from this mission to make the next one BETTER 😎😎😎

every time i see a major news publisher use stock sci-fi images and renders when reporting on science or space developments, i lose a year from my life. i have a few months left

@lazarusblackwell6988

Жыл бұрын

LOL

Outstanding reporting on something Good. Maybe it will work, maybe not,. .but. It's outer space. Only little, pale, green aliens get upset.

The term "spage age" used to mean something. Everyone knew that because we were going to space and had all this new technology coming from the efforts to go there, that was all the rage and it was common knowledge and pride in America for it.

It is the slowest race ever!

I'll believe it when we get there.

Mars can teach us about how to live on Earth. If we find liquid water under the surface of Mars we will probably need desalination technologies to be able to turn large quantities of salt water into something drinkable for low energy cost. If fresh water become abundant all over our planet then we could regrow the deserts and turn barely viable land into a green oasis.

Mars Rover is actually on an island in Canada.

SpaceX can deliver such big loads to orbit that lifting up six nuclear powered craft that always remain in space but can act like a taxi service in a conveyor belt method of autonomous craft to Mars taking supplies while bringing cargo lifted from Earths surface with a Starship could make this project a simple way to maintain a Martian base as well as a Moon base.

The first thing Mars needs is several artificial magnetic field craft wobbling around at the L1 Lagrange point. That way anything done that might affect it's atmosphere is not as easily lost to the solar winds. Strategically placed reflective material on Phobos tidally locked side to Mars will produce extra light and heat to Mars. Some material from Phobos and Deimos could be lobbed to Mars via catapult rovers on those moon. Dark regolith could be sent to absorb more light and help to increase Mars mass. Mass drivers built on the poles of our moon could one day help to send water, materials and mass to Mars. A mass driver built on the poles of Ceres could help to send Nitrogen, water, and other substances to Mars.

@wick9427

Жыл бұрын

this guy knows what's up, based megaproject enjoyer

@finn54123

Жыл бұрын

I feel like an artificial magnetic field for a planet isn’t quite realistic is it? I mean right now, like next few decades. I certainly hope we do something like that one day. I think it was kurzgesagt who did a video on terraforming mars

@eriksonyw

Жыл бұрын

welcome to year 3023

@jwstolk

Жыл бұрын

@@finn54123 It's actually not that hard (Diameter of Mars is smaller than Earth) It can be done with existing superconducting technology and powered by solar. About 4 or 5 loops of wire around Mars can make a small field that is sufficient. Try making a compass an you'll find out that Earths magnetic field is actually also very weak.

@Xeroxiv

Жыл бұрын

Phobos and Deimos are just a few km wide so there is not much mass to catapult into mars

Excellent questions and answers.

Real fun! To live in a hollowed out asteroid. Can't wait to do that. LOL

@buzz5969

Жыл бұрын

Well your gonna have to wait!😅 😂

@AntonioPerez-zk2mb

Жыл бұрын

They just need to focus on building larger space stations in a ring configuration and spin THEM instead of all these bonkers ideas about terraforming environmentally hostile planets and other objects.

@ClockMaster_3100

Жыл бұрын

what's funny is that is actually a viable thing to do. it provides natural protection from radiation.

@ClockMaster_3100

Жыл бұрын

@@AntonioPerez-zk2mb I mean cant you just build a Oniel cylinder within a long asteroid and spin the asteroid

@AntonioPerez-zk2mb

Жыл бұрын

@@ClockMaster_3100 Just build a station that you can engineer specifically for habitation with built in life support features throughout its superstructure. It's more cost effective and easier to do from an engineering standpoint than trying to stabilize and hollow out some asteroid. Just think about it very thoroughly.

the US have 5,582 space-focused companies, almost ten times more than the next country, the UK, which has 615, And there are more than 10,000 total, globally. Most of the 10,000 + companies are clustered in just five sectors, company regional distribution...the US has 52.1%, china has only 2.7%. The U.S. government’s space budget is almost $41 billion, $23.3 billion of which is focused on NASA. China has the next-largest budget at just under $6 billion, reportedly, followed by Russia, France, and Japan with budgets in the $3-4 billion range. The United States spends more on space than all other countries combined, with its budget exceeding the next 15 nations spending by a wide margin.

@ryano.8768

Жыл бұрын

That isn’t taking into account Purchasing Power Parity which accounts for costs if labor, matériels, and utilities in different countries. With that it evens things out a little more, but the US is still far in the lead by spending and provides the vast majority of space services.

@Bitchslapper316

Жыл бұрын

It's not 41 billion, it's under 20. You're counting space force and spending which is military and used for things like military satellites and LEO warfare. China and Russia also expend an enormous amount of resources on the same thing. They also don't disclose their expenditures on it.

@hawkdsl

Жыл бұрын

@@Bitchslapper316 He pointed out the separation clearly I thought. His point was the total space budget, which naturally includes Space Force.

@Bitchslapper316

Жыл бұрын

@@hawkdsl That's not a space exploration budget though. Space force deals with military satellites which are used to support the military on earth. NASA is space exploration. He doesn't know what other countries spend on military satellites because it's a military expenditure and they don't publish it. China has as many satellites in orbit as the U.S has so we can automatically conclude they expend similar resources doing it.

@rickjames18

Жыл бұрын

Imagine how much more would have been done if NASA hadn't wasted so much time and billions on "others" like Boeing failing to deliver all while Musk was well ahead. Biden didn't even invite Elon to the white house for EVs and Tesla is the best. They don't seem to like him. Also, the biggest issue the US faces when it comes to Tech/IP is CCP espionage. Chinese spies have already been caught trying to steal nuclear research secrets. The government isn't very good at stopping spies and the US loses nearly 1 trillion yearly in tech espionage. My fear is that we will develop everything just to have them steal it and pour billions more to make sure they win. Honestly, China has 50 hackers for every 1 in the west. They are bleeding us dry and unfortunetly some western companies just sell or transfer it over which is how they have caught up.

The guy who call out booster ignition made a mistake 😆 🤣

2:47 They said 2030 last time lol

@samr.england613

Жыл бұрын

It's always in the 'future'!

@samr.england613

Жыл бұрын

Hi Reverbex. I assume you're the one that gave me a thumbs-up. Musk and all who follow him are either stupid, or just naive. It's so sad. Even NASA is duped by Musk. None of these milestones is going to happen in the claimed timelines that these people are saying.

Please. A base on the moon has to be established first and that's a ways away.

It was a self destruct by SpaceX plus they only gave it a 50% chance of making it to orbit. The ship performed better than expected actually. Its just one of *many prototype* ship combos. They will make it. Just look at their Falcon rockets that did similar things during development. Now Falcon returns back to earth and lands o a dime every single time. I've never heard of a plan to use both traditional engines and nuclear. I keep a watch for developments by watching SpaceX, other video channels etc. This is the first time I've heard this plan.

@FrankyPi

Жыл бұрын

That's nonsense, Falcon 9 had a very streamlined development that used standard methods and designs, the only aspect of iterative development was the booster landing and recovery, which is something that's always secondary, after the two stages do their job and get payload to orbit, which is its base design and purpose. It had no failures in first flights, and I also heard that not only do none of the people working on Starship worked on F9 before, they never worked on any launch vehicle. These F9 comparisons that are propagandized everywhere hold no water whatsoever as they're nothing but false equivalence fallacies. Starship IFT was nothing but a failure to anyone who doesn't drink the coolade and knows their stuff. Like for everything, having a measure and a balance is key, and going all out on iterative development from scratch, making the core design is not looking good at all, they're going overboard with it. Even an ex-SpaceX veteran Ben Kellie called the flight crappy and a failure. There's a fine line between crappy and scrappy. The general management of this project has been inadequate, impulsive, and shortsighted. I predict it will end up either something unrecognizable from what it is currently and planned, or a total failure. Time will tell.

@wordwarrior2350

Жыл бұрын

And you are an expert at WHAT? Making excuses for E. Musk?

@seasickrhino8926

Жыл бұрын

@@wordwarrior2350 and I suppose that you have extensive knowledge about rocketry, in particular SpaceX and the Starship development system. I guess you know better than the Whole of SpaceX because you’ve watch a few notable televised NASA missions. What they described is what has been observed and communicated by SpaceX and the community of people observing them from the start of the program. This is exactly what was expected by the hardcore space nerd.

@Hobohunter23

Жыл бұрын

spacex is gonna go bankrupt before they ever get to mars, probably the moon.

@andrewthomas8233

Жыл бұрын

Musk is CLOWNSHOES 🤡🤡🤡 LOL

Whatever Astronauts sign up for that mission have balls of steel. Godspeed gentlemen. 🫡

@Space_Rebel

Жыл бұрын

Yep. They always put their lives on the line to go to space. We need explorers to push the envelope.

Imagine if they all just got together we would be head to mars right now

Right!!! Thats the right question if we put our heads together we would be able to figure it out!!!

"You see men sailing on their ego trip; blast off on their spaceship. Million miles from reality; no care for you, no care for me." -So Much Trouble In The World, Bob Marley

Colonizing Mars is very possible and affordable with existing conventional fuels. But adding unnecessary complexity of using nuclear engines is the best way to make sure it will never happen. Maybe nuclear rockets will outperform conventional rockets in 75 years, but it won't play a role in colonizing Mars.

@MarsStarcruiser

Жыл бұрын

I agree, could be a worthy investment for the long term, but in the current context, it almost feels like a sideline to extend the time-clock further.

My dream for Mars: an affordable house with a white picket fence and 2.3 (8-foot tall) children.

@end8316

Жыл бұрын

Hopefully land is cheap

4:13 i was starring at my man's eye browse for the entire time 😂

❤,muy interesante,haría falta otro tipo de inducción un motor diferente capaz con sus funciones de alterar las partículas haciendo que la gravedad no afectará tanto,y haciendo más fluida su velocidad,estabilidad disminución de vibración ,y potencia segura para cruzar las barreras de el espacio.

@ClaudiaMitchell-jn7fw

Жыл бұрын

Fission ?

@LL-bg4vl

Жыл бұрын

@@ClaudiaMitchell-jn7fw A different engine that alters the particles in its core in order to make gravity not a problem, remove strong vibrations, and a safer and faster launch. It's just an opinion, happy day.

@ClaudiaMitchell-jn7fw

Жыл бұрын

@@LL-bg4vl Something internally spins so fast, it eliminates gravity ?

I think earth as a whole is in a race to oblivion. Sad to say. On a more positive note, I love space science and space exploration. I am still an advocate of NASA and their successes.

Ms. Smith and Dr. Frank were great guests! Very informative. Thx for having them on to speak.

Great news article thank you. Been waiting a long time since 69 for us to make another bold move into space.

@shelty3178

Жыл бұрын

Same

IMO the problem isn't going to be the space ship. The real challenge is exposing human beings to 4 to 6 months of hardcore radiation from the sun and getting them there healthy and able to do work.

@xChemistryFTWx

Жыл бұрын

We know how to shield people from radiation. It shouldn't be an insurmountable problem.

@java4653

Жыл бұрын

​@@xChemistryFTWx And there's that Mushy Musk Mind "it's so easy!". The Joe Rogan Idiocracy is here now and

@mecospacesystems

Жыл бұрын

we routinely keep astronauts on the ISS for 6 months on end. Yes these missions are still in earth's magnetic field, but we do have a lot of expereince and data on long term effects of people in space, and through Artemis, we will get a lot of expereince with crewed exploration outside of Earth's magnetic field. The radiation is bad, but not nuclear melt down bad. Honestly, the largest problem we have is keeping astronauts mentally healthy through the mission's duration.

@dotnet97

Жыл бұрын

​@Java It is easy. Radiation shielding is well understood.

@Zurround

Жыл бұрын

You forgot to mention how totally great for human health zero G is. The low gravity of Mars will work wonders for the health of the Astronauts. After a year of one third Earth gravity those astronauts will be in fabulous physical shape. I bet they will all be competing in weight lifting contests when they get back to Earth.

Just use a warp core

@robertmorin6495

Жыл бұрын

Quit day dreaming

Getting there first is pointless being able to STAY first for as long as you want or need is the real goal that has value.

There are lots of plants that grow without soil could be used for capsules

Everytime the rocket launches (or doesn’t make it off the ground) you learn something

@ethanclark739

Жыл бұрын

@@Zarkiola at least it’s not tax dollars this time

@seasickrhino8926

Жыл бұрын

@Zarkiola millions. Billions is when congress and the public cancel the program because they do not understand the reasoning behind it and how it all works. A rocket is a few million dollars. A program is several Billion.

Musk needs to use his drill tech to settle cities inside Mars. Something with a very redundant set of airlocks. Better than domes by far.

@jameswilson5165

Жыл бұрын

Lava tubes are all over the planet, just waiting for us. No need to live in cramped spaces. They are Huge!

@SiriProject

Жыл бұрын

Yes, or perhaps just grab headlines and run away with the money bag (subsidies included)

The first and last words spoken by Russian astronauts during the Mars landing? - Hi Mars... HIMARS !!!!!!!!

Starship is the vehicle that will take us to mars. Nothing else can do it. SpaceX will do it.

@lengthao8424

Жыл бұрын

Can't even took off clean mar only dreaming......!!!!!!!!!

@orionSpacecraft

Жыл бұрын

Starship needs to be refueled multiple times in LEO before departing and would need a methane production facility before arriving on Mars. They also need to deal with cryogenic boiloff and radiation if they are to make the trip. I think that we are gonna see something similar to the Copernicus MTV to make the pioneer trip to Mars, then Starship would be used for future trips once they solve the issues I described.

@Space_Rebel

Жыл бұрын

@@lengthao8424 Prototypes are expendable. The data gleaned from it, isn’t.

The human race is absurd.. It's unfortunate that people have not discovered that by working together, we would most likely be working on getting to one of Saturn's moons by now...

@eddielin6334

Жыл бұрын

If you listen to Nelson continuing his demonizing every single success in Chinese space program, you think it is possible?!!

@dreadstone7226

Жыл бұрын

competition is natural, it is impossible for all of us to work together in harmony.

@eddielin6334

Жыл бұрын

Yes, I totally agree with Mr. Dreadstone that competition is good and natural. I'm just so sick and tired of constantly hearing someone(Nelson) demonizing someone else's effort in space. You can call them competition if you like. Russians and Chinese are humans too. Why is their effort always considered evil and military-related and only the effort of NASA is considered benign, innocent and for the good of all human kind?!!

I have no doubt we will all go nuclear soon enough.

If we can do a lot of “things” in the moon, Mars exploration would be cheaper and have greater chance of success.

I feel like rockets have too small payload.... we need to create in space like moon or build up spacestation the stuff and assemble in space.... that way we can create bigger things... also we can assemble in mars it self. if we find iron or needed resources then we can use mars itself to build the base needed...

I’m all for space exploration and discovery, but a corporate owned Martian colony is the worst idea imaginable. Give a private interest enough independence, and they do some pretty horrible stuff

@Abbadon3232

Жыл бұрын

A corporate controlled mars colony? Sounds like science fiction? Not for much longer.

@icarus387

Жыл бұрын

There's going to be all types of colonies on Mars. Whether corporate, government, or even religious, it's going to be there on Mars.

How about a progression in seed manipulated using placement for in sync panels and prisms to hue seeds? Using light wavelengths to repel pests.

Sun and moon stars rain 🌧️ rises before me... Jamaica sky

That's not big news they should have done this as soon as we know we had to there's a lot of technology we already have and it's probably just setting around.,.,...what are we really waiting for?

@bsharp6812

Жыл бұрын

@Carl Weezer again are we waiting for?

@keurikeuri7851

Жыл бұрын

NASA is afraid to fail. That is why each experimentation and research takes decades even though it should only take a few years if they become very aggressive. Any failure especially loss of life could cause more decrease in the NASA budget or worse ordered cancellation of a project or NASA itself by the government. And the anti-NASA politicians will have a field day if ever something life-threatening incident would happen to any of NASA's projects.

“So it is not surprising that some would have us stay where we are a little longer to rest, to wait. But this city of Houston, this State of Texas, this country of the United States was not built by those who waited and rested and wished to look behind them. This country was conquered by those who moved forward--and so will space.” - John F. Kennedy

The problem is that with countries starting wars on earth, why would we look forward to wars on Mars? Not to mention polluting yet ANOTHER planet.

If one day humans get to go to the moon, maybe they can go to Mars.

Could a beam of less air friction be utilized to clear a flight zone for rockets, entering the different Ozone layers? Think of it as something like a tunnel for trains to pass through. Maybe it was the vibration from the flight that caused either a relay sensor to malfunction, or a latch to jam which caused lack of disconnect. With this proposed beam, it could provide a safe pattern for mishaps to occur less and ensure a more frictionless flight.

@Xeroxiv

Жыл бұрын

you still have gravity to overcome

@hpesoj4573

Жыл бұрын

@@Xeroxiv exactly, and with that, you have the task of determining how to implement an antigravity solution. Good luck, and place your thoughts into a future where it's possible, then bring it back to be constructed. Safe travels 014.

@Xeroxiv

Жыл бұрын

@@hpesoj4573 first i need to find wormhole with the exact date where they invent a antigravity solution. maybe planet 9 is a wormhole? there should be an planet but nobody can find it. maybe it's just too small like a black hole

@timkrouse345

Жыл бұрын

@@Xeroxiv I think it's in Uranus

@yudhirgautam1645

Жыл бұрын

loooks fake af to me

Nobody on earth is Light years ahead of anybody else 8:21

@TheDeadlyDan

Жыл бұрын

A light year is still only a year. I'd say a good many of us are years ahead of others.

Space radiation might make us evolve into aliens 👽👽🧬🧫