“… looking for a way to strike targets around much of the world” That’s really straightforward lol

@frauddiac

2 жыл бұрын

They don't even try to hide it anymore!

@pavelspanik9728

2 жыл бұрын

I dont understand why they still think that world will accept this !unbelievable they actually accuse themselves of beeing the agressor ! Collapse to usa!

@nonamer5453

2 жыл бұрын

Out of harms way the🤭😆

@L98fiero

2 жыл бұрын

Wonder which country is the problem?

@hanrenfighterjet

2 жыл бұрын

how come the AGM 183 stats are almost the same as the AS-16 kickbACK the old tu95 bombers used? tis range it longer but evrything else is the same

Bigger military budget doesn’t mean money well spent . Contractors are happy to bill pentagon hundred thousands for a toilet installation in an aircraft carrier

@MrKentaroMotoPI

2 жыл бұрын

Old, stupid comment.

@MrKentaroMotoPI

2 жыл бұрын

@Charlie Vanderham Yeah, let's give it to BLM. They need more mansions!

@adminit3444

2 жыл бұрын

Plus paying for regular salaried soldiers and feeding 700 camps around the world. Does not improve the hardware technology.

@Oscarcat2212

2 жыл бұрын

20 years and a few Trillion wasted in the middle east did not help. Hopefully lesson learned.

@MrKentaroMotoPI

2 жыл бұрын

@@Oscarcat2212 The trillions in Obama/Biden stimulus that went into Democrat pockets helped them a lot. But yeah, next time let them nuke NYC and DC off the map. No great loss.

China is focused on its peripheral defence. The US is focused on striking targets around the world. Need more be said?

@ancapeancape9829

2 жыл бұрын

China also seeks counter attack ability, put it shortly, if the two can’t get along in peace, China will make sure it has the ability to turn US upside down, and vice-versa. What a great cycle

@laknidubandara

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah your credibility? And what actually Prevents China those so-called peripheral defense missiles from being used as target striking weapons?

@wattlebough

Жыл бұрын

@@laknidubandara Exactly.

@wattlebough

Жыл бұрын

Aircraft carriers have never been for periferal defence. They’ve always been for global power projection. Actions speak louder than words. If the PLA-N says it’s only for periferal defence but builds equipment for global power projection we listen to it’s actions and not it’s words.

@SpyFromMarsZeus

Жыл бұрын

@@laknidubandara The us is known for doing that already with current military power

Hypersonic Missile development is seriously hampered without an appropriate HS wind tunnel. The US has not yet figured out how to make one while China is building a second Mach 30 windtunnel. The HS windtunnel is in itself a very complex technology generating wind speed at Mach 5 to Mach 30 with the ability to adjust the speed on the flight. You need to keep the HS missile stationary for meaningful measurements, so you can collect data for a range of functions, including aerodynamics, performance of sensors at 2000+ Degrees Centigrade and the effect of plasma on electronic communication. You can not do it effectively while the missile is going at Mach 5+ in flight. The failure of US HS tests is closely related to its lack of a suitable HS windtunnel.

@ymxcreatorofworlds7435

3 күн бұрын

Thanks for the info 👍

Is it still a race if one side has already crossed the finish line?

@BuckFiden33

2 жыл бұрын

They're still working on them, they can launch them but hitting their target is a whole different story 😭

@billiehaoneohaokip8140

2 жыл бұрын

You can move the goal post with a faster and more manoeuvreble missile.

@hamzamahmood9565

2 жыл бұрын

Yes, and it appears that Russia has crossed the Finnish line

@AGrace-tw6ku

2 жыл бұрын

USA has 900 military bases worldwide while China has one.

@daxtynminn3415

2 жыл бұрын

Ikr we’ve been working on this missiles since the 50s and the Chinese just showed up to the party.

Title should be - How USA is catching up with China on Hypersonic missiles?

@rfwhyte

2 жыл бұрын

The US has 50+ hypersonic programs in development and has been developing hypersonic weapons since the late 80s. The Chinese are very much catching up and have a long long way to go.

@TheVboy1

2 жыл бұрын

Hahaha

@restartedv69

2 жыл бұрын

@@rfwhyte Yea they had 50 plus programs but china is more Advance even thought with few hypersonic programs

@thevan4476

2 жыл бұрын

This is to preserve the fragile American ego

@Ahda108

2 жыл бұрын

@@rfwhyte u know what's more powerful than the two?? No war and prosperity for both countries.

Can we all just get along?..............

@rajdip8820

2 жыл бұрын

NEVER!

@ancapeancape9829

2 жыл бұрын

Yes please but no somehow

@Nitinmishra.6565

Жыл бұрын

No

It's just me..I find this conflict incredibly pointless. No matter how integrated or dependent countries are in each other they will find reason to annihilate each other.

@reynardop7615

2 жыл бұрын

agree man, its just sad

@charlieq4255

2 жыл бұрын

It's about identity and power, upon which our current social structures are built.

@RdyToMingle

2 жыл бұрын

I believe having the ability of Mutually assured destruction is one of the main catalyst of keeping us safe other wise we would have be in WW3 a long time ago. Look at countries without MAD capabilities such as Ukraine,Iraq,Afghanistan, Syria or any of the countries that Have been invaded

@Cray-wilder

2 жыл бұрын

@@RdyToMingle you do make sense

@q3itachyon209

2 жыл бұрын

The Arms industry needs to make money, look at the NRA

I'm finding it hard to choose between the white one and the green one. They're both really nice.

@MRT-co1sd

2 жыл бұрын

The problem is the white one is at design and testing stage but the green ones are operational from silos, vehicles and most recently on destroyers.

@randy1280

2 жыл бұрын

If you go to Costco you can get both of them in a bundle for a great price!

@robinhood6954

2 жыл бұрын

@@randy1280 Hahaha! 🤣

@robinhood6954

2 жыл бұрын

@@MRT-co1sd It's still such a lovely shade of green. No doubt they'll sell a lot in that colour. I guess it also means they're 'ozone friendly', lol

@MRT-co1sd

2 жыл бұрын

@@robinhood6954 Yep, if you can’t afford your heating bills this winter then you need to do a whole lot more than antagonize the Chinese then they might send u one for free to keep you warm this winter.

These feel like two completly different weapons that just happen to fly really fast. What if the US military is hyping up the chinese missile to secure more funds? o.O

@hamzamahmood9565

2 жыл бұрын

It's almost like our good honest defense contractors are asking taxpayers for more money. For our safety, of course.....

@iviwemajola3167

2 жыл бұрын

Its possible the US had some thing like this as early as the 90's

@ydy2001001

2 жыл бұрын

The only United States is perfect for making killing weapons.

@zhangkenny3604

2 жыл бұрын

@@hamzamahmood9565 haha, you are right and wise.

@roblovestar9159

2 жыл бұрын

Silly question. Both Russia and China have made a big deal of having already developed AND DEPLOYED these missiles. And it is clear our carrier task forces do not have effective defensive measures against them. The questions you should be asking: Why did the US military, despite its huge budget, not see this coming? Why are we playing catch up?

Nicely explained.

The wisest thing that should be on everyones' mind currently, should be, To invest in different streams of income that doesn't depend on the government, especially with the current economic crisis around the world.

@hoshifuyo4494

2 жыл бұрын

And also, Being of age and how to manage the sequence of returns in those early periods is what seems quite scary in the current market. The market is never a loser in the twenty year cycle, but the 2000s decade scenario scares me and could really disrupt my retirement. When you're no longer accumulating but withdrawing, it's hard to be anything but cautious.

@jachikeonwuka3824

2 жыл бұрын

The pandemic really taught people the importance of multiple streams of income. Unfortunately, having a job doesn't guarantee 100% security, rather having different investments is the real deal.

@anouchkabalog6627

2 жыл бұрын

@@jachikeonwuka3824 That's true, I believe that the secret to financial stability is having the right investment ideas to enable you earn more money. But for now, investors getting started can feel overwhelming. Risk loom large and complicated, unfamiliar financial jargons can be intimidating.

@alexmontrey5372

2 жыл бұрын

Some investors look to their investments as a source of income while others use it as a means to grow or preserve their wealth.

@alexmontrey5372

2 жыл бұрын

Also, It is mostly disastrous for newbies or anyone who doesn't adhere to a well thought-out strategy and over all, a professional broker.

USA: If we admit we've the technology we won't get the $$$ to fund it..😂

@LostMySauce

2 жыл бұрын

We've the technology sounds so strange to me

@godzefkiel2686

Жыл бұрын

@@LostMySauce because it’s wrong.

China's got a few working versions while US is still in research phase...😅

@treycash8876

2 жыл бұрын

The dark eagle hypersonic missile at mach 17 is faster than all china anti-ship conventional hypersonic missiles.

@bcf1237

2 жыл бұрын

The US air breathing weapon might blow everything out of the water, instead of having to reach the heights of ballistic missiles in their terminal phase before dropping the glider, the air breathing can skim lower. So while gliders will be detected on launch, undetectable on travel, the air breathing weapon is undetectable in all phases.

@Gmcitizen

2 жыл бұрын

But you know the saying right? If it’s made in china is not good lol

@Shiroya_Rumika

Жыл бұрын

@@Gmcitizen that's a dumb statement

@peiqinwei6670

Жыл бұрын

US hypersonic weapon is a replica of the DF17

They always have money for wars but can’t feed the poor.

@nicedurians

2 жыл бұрын

Just don't be poor

@dannyn.6933

2 жыл бұрын

@@nicedurians Based

@rajdip8820

2 жыл бұрын

@@nicedurians OMGGGGGGG. SOMEONE FINALLY SOLVED ONE OF THE GREATEST PROBLEMS THE HUMAN CIVILISATION HAS EVER FACED.

@belluh-1huey102

2 жыл бұрын

Just actually do something about your economic situation instead of having someone else do it for you.

@durexuncensored

2 жыл бұрын

you cant feed the poor,that causes the poor poorer.

recap: "our missile is faster and kills more!" "no, our missile is faster and kills more!"

@peiqinwei6670

Жыл бұрын

US hypersonic weapon is a replica of the DF17

Alien1: When are we going to invade and get the resources? Alien2: nah let‘s just film them destroy themselves and make a TV show out of it.

When asked if the United States' 11 carrier groups were a threat to China, the Chinese defense minister said, I am paraphrasing, "We have 2,000 anti-ship missiles for each carrier." In a new hot war between technologically advanced superpowers, an aircraft carrier is just as vulnerable as battleships in World War II.

@johnatback2343

2 жыл бұрын

We have drones just like they do so those anti ship missile aren’t a problem oh yuh we also have lasers

@johnsilver9338

2 жыл бұрын

The same can be said for Chinese carriers.

@coreysanders7140

2 жыл бұрын

@@johnsilver9338 they only have one.

@mohamedsaid9416

2 жыл бұрын

Why are humans fascinated with killing each other

@Too-Odd

2 жыл бұрын

@@mohamedsaid9416 Unfortunately, that is a combination of economics, politics, geography, and social science. Malthus and Ricardo explain a lot of it.

The fact there is a race, ok. The idea that anyone at WSJ is privy to the real info on the numbers and status is ridiculous.

I hope this arms race acts as a further deterrent against a real war

@dynjarren5454

2 жыл бұрын

Its a forgone conclusion that at some point...

@travisfubu9053

2 жыл бұрын

the whole point of this race is to be able to catch the enemy by surprise War is inevitable Humans are inherently corrupt and hungry for power.

This video did not hype up Chinese threat, on the contrary they actually toned it down Chinese hypersonic glide vehicles can be land launched, it can also be launched by bombers, AS WELL AS launch by Destroyer ships. Which means China has a much complete system than the USA China's hypersonic missile like the DF-21D, DF-26. YJ-21 (ship and air launched) has anti-ship capabilities. The US has yet to demonstrate such capabilities. People are used to have America leading, but gradually, in all sectors, China is closing the gap and in some areas have surpassed America.

@justincaver324

2 жыл бұрын

But we don’t have efficient truth of the systems being as capable as they say they are

@Caedo12

2 жыл бұрын

But even if that was the case, the sticker on the bottom still says “Made in China”

@xeov12jr10x

2 жыл бұрын

@@Caedo12 You expect a Chinese missile to be made in Mexico?

@Caedo12

2 жыл бұрын

@@xeov12jr10x That whooshing sound you hear is the point, flying over your head.

@xeov12jr10x

2 жыл бұрын

@@Caedo12 I simply replied to a sarcasm with a sarcasm. Whoosh whash whish, cheesy boy acting witty hahaha

We have had hypertonic missiles for a very long time

@roberthaines4221

Жыл бұрын

Everyone has. All ballistic missiles are "hypersonic", but they are _not_ maneuverable. And that is the key to survivability.

@Alexander-vo4gv

13 күн бұрын

what, missiles full of gatorade?

i like it...😊👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻

Russia, China and America speedrunning on who can destroy humanity first.

@SK-hm3ze

2 жыл бұрын

ahahhahahaa, funny

Ohh.. Let me predict the future of the U.S one! Next year the pentagon will say it got 1 or 2 test done successfully and it need an additional 1.2 billion per year for further development

@ancapeancape9829

2 жыл бұрын

Meanwhile there are 9 million unemployed people thinking about their next meal

can't make a military video without 9/11 and Iran/iraq.

@dawuid1491

2 жыл бұрын

It's the greatest collective trauma of the US, it's part of its identity now.

should focus on the race to build infrastructures that improve the well being of citizens and shift the balane of living standards

@SK-hm3ze

2 жыл бұрын

if you invest in infrastructure, then someday comes someone who invested in the industrial-military complex.

@frescoservice5124

2 жыл бұрын

Stop depending on the government for your success. Anyone can become rich is US

@ancapeancape9829

2 жыл бұрын

Fun fact, during the cold war there was a positive sign of life quality and social welfare race between US and USSR, a side effect of the so called "ideology competition". This was completely ignored since USSR lost and the ‘’American value’’ became the golden standard across the globe.

@frescoservice5124

2 жыл бұрын

@@ancapeancape9829 wow did know that where did you read this from or where can I learn more about it.

Hopefully we can use them

Why will the Chinese respond to your requests for a comment??? When your channel is known to smear China 🙄🙄

@levelazn

2 жыл бұрын

it serves journalistic integrity to ask questions that they already know the answers to

The DF 21 was launched a couple months ago , Why doesn't WSJ talk about it ? It's a anti ship ballistic Hypersonic missile designed to sink aircraft carriers

@tluangasailo3663

Жыл бұрын

If it works like ballistics and not HGV or scramjet , then it's not a threat for aegis defence system

@snsproduc

Жыл бұрын

even the DF-17 is designed to be shot down in space before it release the hypersonic glide vehicle but the hypersonic weapons the US is making isn't a ballistic missile so its even more deadly than anything china makes, plus add the extra range a aircraft can add

Wow aweeome ✋😃

Here's the thing. Assuming the hypersonic missiles of the US and China have similar capabilities then China would have an edge because China can build missiles cheaply and build lots of them. Size matters, quantity has a quality all its own. Now, the US would have to think twice about the risk of sending a 5,000-manned aircraft carrier into the firing range of Chinese anti-ship missiles.

@r.s.10

2 жыл бұрын

Well yes that is obviously the strategy lol.

@ancapeancape9829

2 жыл бұрын

Also since China and Russia are basically allied by westerns’ genius policy now, they can potentially deploy weapon systems in each other’s territory.

@Stefan-st

2 жыл бұрын

I’m pretty sure china could sink an Aircraft carrier in the south Chinese sea without hypersonic rockets. But we all know what that would mean.

@markeasley6149

2 жыл бұрын

The premise that the US is the aggressor is why China will fail. China is making themselves a target with their arrogance to compete militarily and constantly pissing off their neighbors. No one is interested in a conventional war, and it will be a sad day for Chinese civilization if the shooting ever starts.

@treycash8876

2 жыл бұрын

America is the second or third largest industrial manufacturer on earth. The US aviation industry dwarfs china's.

The hypersonic cruise missile is what will be truly revolutionary.

@postahundredcommentsbutonl4408

Жыл бұрын

Only China and Russia have high supersonic weapons in the world. The United States has just experimented successfully (2022). China has a high supersonic weapon six years earlier than the United States.

Much like we are seeing the Russian military’s lack of performance. I would like to know how China’s missile performs rather than just talk about what we think they have.

@kentchrist5007

2 жыл бұрын

Well according to pentagon, China sucessfully test their hypersonic missile while the USA fail 3 times in a row for its hypersonic missile.

@sko1beer

2 жыл бұрын

@@kentchrist5007 pentagon would say anything for more funding

@marktrinidad7650

2 жыл бұрын

@@sko1beer Agree. I really doubt China has any hypersonic weapons of some sort. Its all just propaganda so that the Pentagon can ask for more money. As if the almost 800 billion dollars isn't enough.

@alejandrosanchez3246

2 жыл бұрын

The Chinese hypersonic missile do not have scram jet technology. The US does not just want to throw something and say hey we did it! We want to do it right. Just letting you know there are many things out there such as space x’s space rockets which hit hyper sonic speeds 🙂. Many other things out there already go at hypersonic speeds. The Russian hypersonic missile is just an old Soviet era rocket that just goes fast! The US wants to develop a hypersonic weapon but we care more about the future and how we can keep using it. Of course we need more funding for the facilities to test and create them.

@MR-te5fk

2 жыл бұрын

The war on Ukraine is a ruse. Putin is using it, to distract the world while he relocates his nuclear arsenal around Russia to better defend against NATO.

What does 9/11 have to do with hypersonic missile history/development? o_0 And the intent of China's HGV test last summer (you know, the one that went around the world before hitting its intended target) seems pretty clear -- 'We can hold ANY target at risk.'

@DOHA104p3

2 жыл бұрын

After 9/11 attack, America's interest shifted from Europe and east + south Asia to middle east. And there they weren't facing any threats that had the capability to build high tech weapons. So many kf America's advanced weapon programs paused.

@daxtynminn3415

2 жыл бұрын

I know the test you’re talking about it didn’t hit its target it was like 25 miles off or smth.

@SoCalFreelance

2 жыл бұрын

@@daxtynminn3415 Source? That's not what U.S. officials are saying.

@daxtynminn3415

2 жыл бұрын

@@SoCalFreelance Source the Financial Times and The Guardian. btw US officials will say anything to make China look threatening to scare american taxpayers into giving them bigger defense budgets.

@bardgold4553

2 жыл бұрын

the only reason china invested in hypersonic weapons is because 1. the US was heavily interested. 2. the us took an aggressive foreign policy stance against china in Obama's pivot to asia policy.

China and Russia have developed, tested and, in the latter's case, deployed them. It's like asking who's most likely to win the 2022 F1 US Grand Prix

It is also important to think about how military placement affects the necessity for these missiles. The Unites States has their Navy as well as military placed all over the globe, and are able to quickly mobilize to places like Asia in an instant. China on the other hand would mostly rely on longer range combat if a major war ever broke out, as due to their geographic region, China is navally confined to a very limited area. In addition, China has a poorly developed air force, ESPECIALLY compared to the United States. I'm not saying it isn't necessary for the US to develop these weapons, but the situations of both countries is certainly different

@michaelzhang2995

2 жыл бұрын

YOU SURE ABOUT'China has a poorly developed air force"?????

@fouly1981

2 жыл бұрын

The Chinese Air Force is poorly developed? The expert told you... 😏 Yes, compared to the size of the U.S. Air Force, China's strength is still far away. But in terms of comprehensive capabilities in the world, only China can compare with the United States.

@krishnachaitanya1220

2 жыл бұрын

Very true china has regional aspirations unlike America which is rotting from inside but wants to dominate the globe

@Jane-qh2yd

2 жыл бұрын

@@fouly1981 But that is the thing. Chinas objective isn't to develop their military past the capabilities of the rest of their world, their main objective in this new arm's race is to beat the United States. China is still very far from the US regardless of the current state on hypersonics

@animeee4380

2 жыл бұрын

The US has experience in bombing other countries and wipe out million Of lives

Weapons race creates more advanced weapons to provide more advanced security and its a neverending story, that's why military industry is one MONSTROUS BUSINESS!

@yia01

2 жыл бұрын

F-22 and F35 make lockheed stock return 5x. lockheed is also very well invole int eh US hypersonice cruise missle as well and when its operational,i expect another 2x to 3x return on lockheed stock. if lockheed also win the 6th gen fighter race, lockheed gonna make a lot of investor lots of money well past 2050

@El.Duder-ino

2 жыл бұрын

@@yia01 "Cool", go for it. Invest in the weapons of war so we can develop more advanced high tech "sticks" to better and harder hit each other when we disagree about something. US military complex sits at the top of word's military spending and shows the rest of the world what "game" weapons of war play in the society.

@nehcooahnait7827

Жыл бұрын

Business, huh? Tsk tsk tsk

No war 🇺🇸❤️🇨🇳

The arrow doesn't seem like it would glide very well or manoeuvre its self affectively

The United States possesses several energy weapons that can easily defeat these incoming missiles, provided they are powered up and ready to deployed prior to an enemy missile launch. The reason the US has resumed development of these weapons, which it abandoned in the late 1950's is simply for offense as the enemies systems are slowly getting better at defense. This is why the only real talk in US circles about defending from these weapons is about devolving command and control, so defensive meassures can be deployed immediately, without asking for permission up the chain of command and not about developing or buying new weapons systems.

@davidmoss2576

Жыл бұрын

You have no idea what you are talking about

As has been pointed out, the first hypersonic missile was the German V2.

@FrostbitexP

2 жыл бұрын

Meh. Hypersonic missiles and ballistic missiles (which are almost by nature hypersonic) are simply categorized as two different things. No point trying to intertwine the two.

@Macorian

Жыл бұрын

@@FrostbitexP Still worth noting that the Germans built the stuff 80 years ago. Then her engineers were snatched away by the US and partly the Soviet Union.

GRLC, Utah

The problem is df 17 is hypersonic glide misile.her not have curves when fly to target

Strange that you didnt mention russian hypersonic missles Callibre used in Ukraine

@vladrazym9955

2 жыл бұрын

@T B Im pretty sure they were. At least our deffence forces told that, I think US intelligence have confirmed that Ps Im not russian, but Ukranian - in case if you think I would lie

The US first proposed and started researching on hypersonic missiles, but China and Russia first developed, test and serve these missiles in their military?😳

Wow, from aircrafts to missiles, "Stealth" is the word, ECCM going stealth too?

Come on America's hypersonic missiles are actually hypersonic engines not just glide vehicles

@mcc9102

Жыл бұрын

Checked out Chinese university 's Feitian 1 hypersonic scramjet transformation engine. American hacked that university few weeks ago trying to steal their technology

Our complacency on this matter cannot be overstated, however, the recent efforts we're putting into hypersonics, we must apply that same effort into deterrence. Intercept systems, that at least theoretically could take down an enemy hypersonic attack.

@levelazn

2 жыл бұрын

we build chinatowns everywhere, it's game over

@Three-LeggedCat

2 жыл бұрын

@@levelazn I'll agree with you that we're definitely not doing great right now and we are highly infiltrated

@travisfubu9053

2 жыл бұрын

You can't even intervene in Ukraine buddy get back to Walmart and don't forget to watch your latest LGTBTQEIROZF super hero movie from marvel.

@peiqinwei6670

Жыл бұрын

US hypersonic weapon is a replica of the DF17

@Three-LeggedCat

Жыл бұрын

@@peiqinwei6670 you speak as if you have definitive proof of this. Also, have the Chinese never mimicked American technology? Whether that's true or not I don't think it really matters. Military secrets are stolen constantly, to the detriment and benefit of all countries. Unless you're going to provide some sort of proof on the matter, I can't really regard your comment with any reverence

The difference is the US have been in wars since one can remember. China on the other hand has never invaded another country. The last time they engaged in a war was in world war 2. They got invaded.

@dawuid1491

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah, conflict in Tibet, War with Soviet Union, War with the UN army in Korea, War with Vietnam, War with India never happened right?

@willaimoconnell9430

2 жыл бұрын

Laos, Cambodia, Nepal, Mynamar, Malaysia, India, Bhutan, Turkestan, Tibet, Phillipines, Korea, Vietnam twice and Russia twice. All since 1947. Facts.

@MagnificientTheory

2 жыл бұрын

It seems you need to brush up on your history

@travisfubu9053

2 жыл бұрын

@@willaimoconnell9430 None of those are invasions the US has been at war for like +40 times Try again

@travisfubu9053

2 жыл бұрын

@@dawuid1491 obviously he means recently but you choose to deliberately miss his point because you have no rebuttal to the fact that the US has been at war more than China and Russia combined since 1945. Nice cope

Russia be like "tf i'm the one who actually used it first"🤣

Wonder what the shell is made out of ceramics? They say the black bird was 800 degrees going 2,200 mph. In the upper atmosphere.

I don't know if I buy this, the lady said the US has been working on this since the 50s, the US doesn't share cutting edge military technology like this with anybody outside nato. How would China be able to develop these missiles in such a short period of time?

@peiqinwei6670

Жыл бұрын

US hypersonic weapon is a replica of the DF17

@liongjiahwong5478

7 күн бұрын

Everything is stolen.. even the Space Station, the latest rocket to the Moon Chang'er 6, from America. As most idiots believe ?

That’s weird, all other studies show that the Chinese version goes 20 times the speed of sound and ours only goes 4000 mph….

@Deadassbruhfrfr

2 жыл бұрын

20? Nonsense, the Chinese version can go 200x the speed of sound. I would know.

@AlexSanchez-ms4oz

2 жыл бұрын

@@Deadassbruhfrfr 200x? nonsense, The chinese version can go 20000000x times the speed of light (p.s this is sarcasm)

@Deadassbruhfrfr

2 жыл бұрын

@@AlexSanchez-ms4oz *surprise Pikachu face* 😯

@robertgittings8662

2 жыл бұрын

@@AlexSanchez-ms4oz hi traitors, the ones in the US DARPA and the area 51 in the 1980s can go eight million miles per hour, they are just not showing us ... you have seen nothing yet ... the Chinese and Russian weapons they are just developing now the US already developed similar or better one in the 1960s 1970s it was classified as top secret now due to successful hacking operations of both Russian and the Chinese they just successfully copied the US Give a round of applause to the hard-working Chinese and Russian hackers, help spreading this awesome technology to other parts of the world

@robertgittings8662

2 жыл бұрын

@@Deadassbruhfrfr hi traitors, the ones in the US DARPA and the area 51 in the 1980s can go eight million miles per hour, they are just not showing us ... you have seen nothing yet ... we all know Russian stuff is cheap and Chinese can only copies, the Chinese and Russian weapons they are just developing now the US already developed similar or better one in the 1960s 1970s *it was classified as top secret* now due to successful hacking operations of both Russian and the Chinese they just successfully copied the US Give a round of applause to the hard-working Chinese and Russian hackers, help spreading this awesome technology to other parts of the world

Released a day ago-fails to mention the successful ARRW tests within the past few months. Also, fails to mention accuracy, the higher standard the US Military has for classifying something as “operational”. Recommend anyone watching this to go watch Sandboxx and it’s awesome analysis of hypersonics.

@ancapeancape9829

2 жыл бұрын

Well US won the killing competition, again, big congratulations

@treycash8876

2 жыл бұрын

@@ancapeancape9829 Russian and Chinese troll are in denial. America is catching up fast with recent successful secret and public flight tests.

@treycash8876

2 жыл бұрын

@MorPlays according to the aviation week site DARPA secretly tested the TBG glider in mid April if I not mistaken. There are tests in the classified world in which the US military conducts and releases what need to know for the public.

@I_Came_With_Fire_Podcast

2 жыл бұрын

@MorPlays I didn’t say it was operational, I said the US has higher standards for calling something operational. Like the so-called Russian “hypersonic” Kinzhal. That’s a relic with a new motor. That’s nothing the US would brag about. The US is also much more open with its failures than the BS Commie state in Russia and China. You and I also have zero idea what actually is real and what isn’t because neither of us are high level employees for our respective governments. All I know is the US does have a real Scramjet hypersonic missile and while we were not the first to make “operational” the technology, that hasn’t stopped us before or did you not read about the Space Race in school?

My questions are how do these weapons deal with plasma sheath, and with the heat generated from high speeds in the earths atmosphere?

This article misses the biggest point regarding the difference between Russian and Chinese systems. They are mostly putting wings on existing rockets. The US is creating scramjets. What's the difference? Cost. Its not enough to have a few days or weeks supply. This is what other countries are learning now.

@scottsauritch3216

2 жыл бұрын

Yes, mostly ALBM's... Zircon, like US H.A.W.C. is supposedly LEGIT SCRAMJET powered missile that works and Russian desperately trying to Mass-produce them....

@hamzamahmood9565

2 жыл бұрын

Dude these media people are just as stupid as they are corrupt. We have hundreds of ICBMS each containing multiple warheads and decoys deliverable from anywhere on Earth under an hour. Oh yeah, and they are impossible to shoot down on a large scale. There is a good reason U.S. military, the leading force for decades, isnt particularly fascinated with hypersonic technology. They know it makes no real difference to the threat of nuclear warfare. If it did, we would'nt have let China and Russia to get ahead of us

@StromBugSlayer

2 жыл бұрын

The Russian Zicon weapon is definitely a scramjet, and is a mach 9 weapon with manuevering capability.

@JigilJigil

2 жыл бұрын

@@StromBugSlayer The russian Zicon is nothing but a propaganda tool.

@StromBugSlayer

2 жыл бұрын

@@JigilJigil Evidence?

Putin smiling watching puppies struggling for some crumbs.

@ancapeancape9829

2 жыл бұрын

Also since Russia and China can potentially deploy weapon systems on each other’s territory now, the effectiveness of their strikes are probably way higher than face value

A show a saw recently, " Modern Marvels " taped in 2007 showed the X16 plane powered with a hypersonic rocket engine in 1962(?)that flew 5 times the speed of sound. My theory would be that, the U.S being miles ahead of any country, at that time, would be more than capable of producing such a missile. I would never, if i were China or Russia ever underestimate the U.S . That would be a mistake. 0_o

@hangten1904

Жыл бұрын

9/11 attacks wasn't even done with missiles at all. Also these weapons are useless if fighting against unconventional enemies like gorilla fighters hiding amongst civilians.

@nehcooahnait7827

Жыл бұрын

Fill the gap with imaginations

We are still retrofitting the B52.... crazy

🤣Russia is No.1 on hypersonic tech and US don’t compete with No.1? Instead they picked No.3 as their primary target? I understand US government need enough fake excuses to keep the defence budget high but please at least make some senses…

@coldham77

2 жыл бұрын

The Russian government can't afford to launch it, so it doesn't matter. Their whole military is looking like a paper tiger every day.

@robertgittings8662

2 жыл бұрын

The ones in the US DARPA and the area 51 in the 1980s can go above 8 million miles per hour, they are just not showing us ... you have seen nothing yet ... we all know Russian stuff for cheap and the Chinese can only copy ... the Chinese and Russian weapons they are just developing now the US already developed similar or better one in the 1960s 1970s it was classified as top secret now due to successful hacking operations of both Russian and the Chinese they just successfully copied the US Give a round of applause to the hard-working Chinese and Russian hackers, help spreading this awesome technology to other parts of the world

@huas5350

2 жыл бұрын

In this field, U.S is No. 3

@snsproduc

Жыл бұрын

China is 3

Race what China already have hypersonic missile

China has several HS missile models, DF-17, YJ-21, DF-21D, DF-26 and the latest and most lethal hypersonic glider missle, the DF-27. In 2017 China built a Mach 10 hypersonic missile windtunnel. Just months ago China finished building a Mach 30 windtunnel. Many people many not appreciate that HS windtunnel technology is every bit as complex as the hypersonic missiles! To generate wind velocity at Mach 30 you need sustained and smoothed out EXPLOSIONS !! You can imagine the complexity. But China has successfully overcomed the technology difficulties. The US failed the lastest hs missile test in June 2022 and has been quite since. The key reason why the uS failed several time on HS missile tests is because without a modern HS windtunnel, you can not perform any meaningful tests and collect high quality operational data. If you use a 50 year old wind tunnel, it is not going to give you the best test data you need. If you drop it from a Bomber, how do you track and make measurements of in-flight operational parameters? I believe the US is at least 5 years behind China in HS missile technology. The ability for the US to win the Taiwan war against China is severely restricted.

We shouldn’t just match we need to move ahead or we’ll be out paced

Imagine spending your entire adult life researching ways to destroy the world. That's one sad life to have. 😞

@frescoservice5124

2 жыл бұрын

People like you get picked on and you can’t defend yourself

@edifier107

2 жыл бұрын

Not when you are up against evil forces who develop the same type of weapons. How else would we have defeated Nazi Germany without weapons of war?

@frescoservice5124

2 жыл бұрын

Sorry I didn’t mean to diss you but it drives me crazy when people think that life is all butterflies and rainbows, having a long life career that helped defend your country is not sad it’s essential

@chungusmaximus526

2 жыл бұрын

You must have been one of the "STOP!! this isn't you 🥺🥺😿😿" type of mfs

Nahhhhhh US will not allow to be in second place.

Good video though no mention of Russia… which seems to have the edge on both China & the US.

Jake looks sick

While they race Russians already have Avangard (hypersonic glide vehicle) Mach 27 in use two hypersonic cruise missiles one air launched of Mach 12 other ship launched of Mach 10.

@treycash8876

2 жыл бұрын

The US LRHW is mach 17

@mandalorian3865

2 жыл бұрын

@@treycash8876 nope

@treycash8876

2 жыл бұрын

@@mandalorian3865 it's been test in March 2020 and verified

@tluangasailo3663

Жыл бұрын

Kinzhal is not hypersonic cruise missile , it only air launch ballistic missile however zircon is hypersonic cruise missile, avangard may be huge but it can't hit moving target and not accurate for conventional purpose

@treycash8876

Жыл бұрын

The CPS hypersonic weapon Navy version will render Zircon and russian navy nil. Its way faster and has a greater range of 2000 km + over the zircon missile. The CPS glider B version with heat seeking will be rapidly implemented 2024. America is starting to catch up and move faster than Russia quietly and secretly.

Race? What race? The DF-17 went into service in 2019. China's hypersonic missiles have been operational for a while now. Russia too has hypersonics. Reportedly, NK too. The fact is America is desperately trying to play catch up. But American msm spin is always something to behold, and increasingly amusing.

@tluangasailo3663

Жыл бұрын

The main differences is, US is the only one that can develop air launch HGV & scramjet with a more compact size but with faster speed........(please don't say kinzhal, it's doesn't fall into category of HGV&scramjet)

@snsproduc

Жыл бұрын

the missile the US is making, is not a ballistic missile, which are the ones that china have (can be shot down before re entry). Also adds extra range coming from a aircraft

How I understand it our military don't have the raw materials to build these or stinger and Javelin missiles

@Aurora-cx3fe

2 жыл бұрын

Usa literally messed up in Afghanistan which has tons of rare earth

You mean,were racing to catch up..

India Developing its own New Hypersonic Missile 🇮🇳🇮🇳🙏

@happy_man_x

2 жыл бұрын

russia helping them

@yogi9631

2 жыл бұрын

🤣🤣🤣

@KaneWilliamson..

2 жыл бұрын

@@happy_man_x one made with collaboration with russia and another india developing its own 😀😀

@peiqinwei6670

Жыл бұрын

India develops hypersonic toilet

According to a report, scientists at Tsinghua University and Peking University are working on a new type of hypersonic missile, which will be faster and more advanced than the existing hypersonic missile.

it makes you feel like you've been transported back to the good old days of the cold war...

@hughmungus2760

2 жыл бұрын

more like the bad old days of 1970s with shortages, stagflation and a recent military failure.

@SK-hm3ze

2 жыл бұрын

the cold war did not stop, it was on pause. Now we are back on track with more players.

15000 miles per hour is a joke 😂. Maybe they added a zero by mistake

With two parties focused on constantly fighting one another, on ya, China will always win

@kingmight633

2 жыл бұрын

Yea sure in its war games China is not battle hardened like the USA keep simulating and think advance weapons win wars it will if u have capable soldiers who already been in war battle tested our military would crush China.

This is not a 2 horse race? India and Russia also have tested and in production missiles.

@sksksks5072

2 жыл бұрын

russia sure but india u make me laugh

@TomNook.

2 жыл бұрын

Google it.

@rajdip8820

2 жыл бұрын

@@sksksks5072 typical ignorant guy on yt

@ashwinvk4124

2 жыл бұрын

@@sksksks5072 but india is also developing missiles

@antoniofortich2095

2 жыл бұрын

What??? Russia used it already in Ukraine.. Where planet you came from?

Next year you say, more maybe or never

It must be pointy!

It's not a race, China is light years ahead of the US.

@Ironpancakemoose

2 жыл бұрын

Hardly

@michaelsamuel9917

2 жыл бұрын

China has also envisioned using their Hypersonic missiles to Shoot down meteorites in orbit heading to earth I'd think the Pentagon would be the first to step up to the plate on this very important duty!

@slimsolo8171

2 жыл бұрын

Usa just tested a scram jet engine it's more complicated than the ones china and Russia currently using the weapons USA has now is more than enough

WSJ should be delighted. China will probably commercialise this as a form of freight transport to ship containers of Walmart goods from China, WSJ's favourite factory.

@jps9423

2 жыл бұрын

How can you say something like that?

@demontrader1222

2 жыл бұрын

@@jps9423 You have a pair of eyes, I presume?

@jps9423

2 жыл бұрын

@@demontrader1222 What do you mean exactly?

Its no secret now!!!!

Actually india doesn’t worry because india always the leader in hypersonic missile technology

@happy_man_x

2 жыл бұрын

im laughing

@zjc8043

2 жыл бұрын

Okay if that makes you feel good. Nobody cares about India

@jupiter3678

Жыл бұрын

Brahmos was supersonic

They didnt include russia because russia already has these

Next is India. hypersonic 💪🇮🇳

in the coming years same counties are tries to develop nuclear carrier hypersonic missile

Speed of sound seems pretty slow

I don't get how we can have icbms that reach hypersonic speeds but we can't get this to work, I personally think it's a smoke screen for our real capabilities.

Must it always be weapons? Why not who's going to build the best high speed rail system or the most comprehensive universal health coverage, affordable mass housing and food security? Let the US and China compete on indices that benefit and destroy humanity.

@containedhurricane

2 жыл бұрын

Unfortunately, power rules in this world. The most powerful country in the world can't let the others take their dominance over the world order and economy

@mmd488

2 жыл бұрын

China has achieved all the points you mentioned more than 2 decades ago. US on the other hand is just allowing Billionaires to fly into space without paying taxes. No tax means no public healthcare, poor infrastructure, aging military, government shutdowns, wealth inequality and more crime. When was the last time you heard a drug epidemic, gun violence or endless wars abroad from China? They used the time build themselves up and now as the West is pushing them, they are ready to push back. China has matched or surpassed the US in most tech aspects, plus they have a huge work force and stable governance. Yes, they have their own failings but not in the areas you mentioned.

@izuchukwuezukanma1132

2 жыл бұрын

@@mmd488 I'm surprised that a country that landed man on the moon doesn't have high speed rail system. I used to think that US is a democracy until I found that it is basically a government run by big corporations. CORPORATOCRACY. China is expanding her influence rapidly especially in developing countries. China is helping many countries in Africa acquire critical infrastructure while US is busy amassing nukes. Most people need infrastructure and not weapons. US as a very innovative society is best placed to assist many countries solve some of their problems. But they are not doing any of these. Instead China and recently Russia are making big inroads in the developing world.

@mmd488

2 жыл бұрын

Hard times create good men, good men create good times, good times create weak men, weak men create hard times. This is the cycle of every great civilization. US will fall coz of its own weak men who are more busy fighting and stealing from each other than building a better world.

@ancapeancape9829

2 жыл бұрын

@@izuchukwuezukanma1132 Shhh don't say that, it's politically incorrect for the westerners, everything connected to China must be bad, American value must be the beacon of mankind

in order to strengthen our self we should have to bay an enormous effort to increase our self defence mechanism

Nowadays it's all about missiles, missiles wins wars

Chinese missile is launched from land, so it is more for defence; while American missile is launched from bomer, it is more for attacking. So China is the threat for the world😂😂😂

@haridym

2 жыл бұрын

The US logic: if you're able to defend yourself, you're a threat.

@containedhurricane

2 жыл бұрын

The elites are worried that China might develop it further. Hence the aggression to stop it before it becomes too powerful, as seen in China's economy

@bardgold4553

2 жыл бұрын

the moment they said its launched from a bomber made me think "oh its offensive weapon".

@anshulagrawal3931

2 жыл бұрын

this

@werds1392

Жыл бұрын

@@bardgold4553 actually the us kept over 10 nuclear equipped bombers in the air 24/7 during the Cold War. It was actually a deterrent (part of the nuclear triad) because nukes that are ready to deploy in minutes were considered as a deterrent to preemptive strike by guaranteeing mutually assured destruction. Not making any judgement calls here, just reporting the logic used by the US and USSR in the 20th century.

The New Arms Race is both high-power laser weapons and hypersonic missiles. The only way to stop hypersonic missiles flying in the sky is to use high-power laser weapons from space satellites weapons, military planes, naval ships, and on the ground to shoot to destroy them. Laser light travels so many times faster than any hypersonic missile. Hypersonic missiles which are traveling a few times faster than the speed of sound, can be detected, tracked, calculated, and identified by high-tech radars and space satellites with supercomputers due to so much heat generated behind and a lot of heat at the noses of the flying hypersonic missiles and can be shot down by laser weapons.

@jackwitman8504

2 жыл бұрын

All the more reason why we should have seen them for the enemy they are. Too bad we didn't help the Japanese and let them take out the population, or even backed the British during the opium wars, which incidentally, the Chinese have turned against us with fentanyl.

WSJ said the US was way behind China and Russia even though we developed the technology in the 50s. The WSJ should stick to financial news.

Imagine how any country would feel if only the U.S. had these such weapons.

Shaurya and brahmos 2 is also hypersonic missiles.

@saurabhmishra3291

2 жыл бұрын

Brahmos 2 is a future project that is expected to be completed by 2027.

I have as yet to hear what the advantage of a ultra fast rocket other than "slower missiles are easier to track and shoot down" but the efficacy of anti missile defense is only 30-70%. So sending more of the slower cheeper missiles seems to get the job done (hitting target) without investing in the, so far, dubious advantage of hypersonic. Regarding ICBMs, they are already hypersonic and there are no good defenses against them.

@speedplays6710

2 жыл бұрын

Getting a nuke shot down would suck

@TheOuskie

2 жыл бұрын

hard to counter harder to shoot down

@granitfog

2 жыл бұрын

@@TheOuskie same nearly goes for conventional rockets with 30-60 % failure rate of defense against conventional rockets, And for ICBM's 100% failure rate.

@Ilovecruise

2 жыл бұрын

But the difference between hypersonic missile and ICBM is that hypersonic missile is cheap, as cheap as cruise missile, that’s what makes the hypersonic missile so well known, because they could have thousands and thousands of them and deploy them in saturation attack. Not the expensive hella that US testing

@pindot787

2 жыл бұрын

@@Ilovecruise but the cheap hypersonic missile are actually useless against moving target. so why bother.

Hypersonic missiles will make any large ships, especially aircraft carriers siting ducks in traditional warfare, also, in the worst case scenario, it can delivery wmd payload at a speed and trajectory that cannot be intercepted.

One is a cruise missile ones a glide vehicle.. us has the only cruise missile that hypersonic with a variable scram jet