1:29:00 Evil god challenge. I highly recommend Trent Horn's video on this. A maximally evil being firstly isn't a thing, bc nothing can be totally deprived of good. Then the great-making property of existence would not apply. Additionally, a MEB is less simple than a MGB.

1:15:15 He says some of the most influential people to him are those who don't exist. I agree. Take Spider-Man. But notice the evolution of a character like him. He started out as static ink on pages, was made into a cartoon, eventually to crude live-action, and eventually, hyper-realistic movies. It seems like the greater something is, the more we want to feel like they exist. So, I think his point works for us.

18:06 Plantinga's version

54:00 On the confusion here, i would say the Ontological Argument promotes a _multi-personal_ being. Obviously, we believe based on _special_ revelation that he is three.

The Ontological Argument is the best imo (in a good version) but unfortunately, is tactically problematic, since it's hard to understand, and skeptics refuse to try. 😢

This atheist, like most of them in my experience, is quite arrogant. Much smarter skeptics than him are impressed by this argument. Joe Schmid for example.

"I was a Christian for a long time" continues to say God needs angels and scouts. This is why you can't just be a cultural Christian, you have to study and think about these things. Haven't heard a more stupid objection in a long time.

Superstition and fallacious arguments still going strong I see, yawwwnnnnnnnnnnnn.........