🕊 God Bless You for This 🕊 Good 🙏 🆚 Evil 👹

@Bomtombadi1

4 ай бұрын

This isn’t anything to do with good vs evil. Get off it.

@A-Clear_View

2 ай бұрын

From a religious perspective, it’s probably closer to ignorant to knowing

For the word of God is alive and active. Sharper than any double-edged sword, it penetrates even to dividing soul and spirit, joints and marrow; it judges the thoughts and attitudes of the heart. Hebrews 4:12 All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, so that the servant of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work. 2 Timothy 3:16-17 Your word is a lamp for my feet, a light on my path. Psalm 119:105

@ron88303

4 ай бұрын

If there is a God (or Gods), we are here solely for his (or their) entertainment.

@IAMhassentyou

4 ай бұрын

@@ron88303 do you truly believe that? God is so good. I hope you see that one day.

@philhart4849

4 ай бұрын

@@IAMhassentyou The God of the Bible is a genocidal maniac.

@stevegoulding6328

4 ай бұрын

​@@ron88303 If you read the bible you will see that this isn't true. If we were just entertainment, would God love us enough to send His only Son to a certain death in order to save us? Even Jesus prayed to God before his crucifixion and asked if there was another way. He also said, if there isn't, then let thy will be done. Did God do this for His entertainment too? If you're going to comment on Christian videos, you might want to do some study 1st so you're comments might have some credibility.

@denvan3143

4 ай бұрын

@@ron88303 you project onto gods as you perceive them, as having no more empathy than yourself; from that perspective, perhaps you exist solely for my entertainment.

beautiful

Thank you for explaining this was happy to share

Yup. I had to re-evaluate. The Coof started it all. And many things unraveled. When I learned of your channel and watched the content, part of me was not happy with what you were saying about evolution. Slowly but surely, I came around and started to see what you were saying. Evolution definitely has many holes. Hopefully, many others will come around.

@Bomtombadi1

4 ай бұрын

Like what?

@JiraiyaSama86

4 ай бұрын

@@Bomtombadi1 What do you mean?

@jockyoung4491

4 ай бұрын

@@JiraiyaSama86 Where are these holes in the theory of biological evolution? And I don't mean details we don't know. That doesn't refute anything. Biological evolution has not had a significant scientific challenge in over 100 years. If you've got one, lay it on us.

@JiraiyaSama86

4 ай бұрын

@@jockyoung4491 Dude. You're essentially asking me not to poke holes in your knowledge. You're essentially limiting the questions I get to ask of the topic. All just so you can defend evolution. Sorry, buddy. I ask whatever question is relevant, and you get to try to answer. If the question is about whether it's relevant, we can have a sub discussion, so long as it doesn't pull us off course.

@jockyoung4491

4 ай бұрын

@@JiraiyaSama86 I am talking about science so I am limiting the questions to science, yes. The theory of biological evolution is science, and it stands or falls exclusively on scientific evidence and logic. You said evolution has many holes. Name one.

Amen AIG 🙏

I can hear the Atheists already clicking away to say “Ah-ha! There is a third! He committed suicide!” to the example given without ever thinking it through first. If the victim died by suicide, then it means someone intended for the guy to die, then actively made it happen-the killer would simply be himself, and not someone else, meaning: only two options still exist! Natural causes, or killed by a person. So much for those ironically proving your point by trying to break it.

Great psychological insight as well as to why people are so willingly ignorant. Fleeing from cognitive dissonance as you described 😎

You can be an atheist and not believe that evolution is the current best explanation for speciation Atheism and evolution don’t have anything to do with one another.

@HS-zk5nn

4 ай бұрын

But you are one and believe in it

@nathancook2852

4 ай бұрын

@@HS-zk5nn That doesn't disprove his statement.

@HS-zk5nn

4 ай бұрын

@@nathancook2852 and you are one also and believe it

@jockyoung4491

4 ай бұрын

@@HS-zk5nn The point is that that someone's faith is irrelevant to doing science. Christians, Muslims, and atheists all do science the same way, because all live in the same natural world, and all have brains that can reason. Millions of Christians accept the science of evolution for the same reasons.

@jockyoung4491

4 ай бұрын

@@HS-zk5nn The point is that someone's faith is irrelevant to science. Christians, atheists, and everybody else all do science the same way, because they all live in the same natural world and have the same reasoning brains. Science can say nothing about faith and faith can say nothing about science.

So you completely dismiss the possibility of a non-biblical supernatural origin?

@annieoaktree6774

4 ай бұрын

Of course their particular supernatural Deity is the only one allowed . The other several thousand ones humans have invented don't count.

@somethingtothinkabout167

4 ай бұрын

What is a supernatural orgin?

@AtomicDragon

4 ай бұрын

@@somethingtothinkabout167 I have absolutely no idea, but apparently "God" didn't need a creator because he's "supernatural", and I'm curious why this particular status couldn't apply to any other potential forces, phenomena, or entities.

@LukeCh.10verse16-mb8om

3 ай бұрын

@@AtomicDragon ,...Read the Bible and find out.

@AtomicDragon

3 ай бұрын

@@LukeCh.10verse16-mb8om I have read the Bible. Now why should I give more care to what it says than to any other book?

1:49 nope. Look up godel s theorem of incompletenes

? I don't get it. He didn't answer the question of where the universe came from. He only talked about the origin of life, which is a downstream process from the universe itself.

@LukeCh.10verse16-mb8om

3 ай бұрын

There is no universe. The 100% false idea of a universe only comes from Godless mankind's fake religion of scientism. The fact is, scientism is the real religion of the church, not the Bibles Christianity.

Ah, the logical fallacy of the false dichotomy. How terribly quaint!

@somethingtothinkabout167

4 ай бұрын

You sound like an intellectual fallacy.

@user-on3wh6wu9n

4 ай бұрын

@@somethingtothinkabout167 Is that the best that you do? 🤣

I do not get the logic, why should evolution be the only non-God option. What would the statement have been before the concept of evolution was formulated? We do not know is a valid concept in science. So just because none has described another atheistic concept, does not prove it is impossible.

@jockyoung4491

4 ай бұрын

Logic? These people start with the Bible and force everything else to conform. There is no logic involved.

@tonbears

4 ай бұрын

Atheism is the view that God does not exist. Atheism is not a new development. Psalm 14:1, written by David around 1000 B.C., mentions atheism: “The fool says in his heart, ‘There is no God.’”

@jockyoung4491

4 ай бұрын

Logic has nothing to do with it.

@m0x910

4 ай бұрын

Ignorance may be a valid concept in the field of science but this narrow field does not encapsulate all of our reality. Evolution (as poor as it is) is the best naturalistic hypothesis, all the others fall so short they aren’t even worth consideration. If there were a better atheistic explanation someone should have fabricated it already. However the Devine explanation is the best and most coherent explanation given not just the scientific evidence and observations but those outside the field of science. All of reality points to God being the creator and sustainer of the universe.

@m0x910

4 ай бұрын

@@jockyoung4491 Logic has everything to do with it. It is the foundation of our physical and communicative reality.

Hey guys, from Genesis, have you ever thought about doing A? You know, like one not too long for a video but maybe like a demon of video about species showing the different species of a particular kind to show that that is an example of the so-called evolution that does occur through an natural selection, indoor the micro evolution but how it approves and shows that even were A. Long period of time, there's no evidence. No observation tha these animals don't even branch out to be coming a brand new kind etc. By the way, car bus you guys and on a different place. I'll give you one of my usual special poems.

If you somehow manage to ever prove evolution false, it still wouldn't mean creationism is true or that your god is real.

@jacob.tudragens

3 ай бұрын

You know, like this comment!

@josebencomo2385

2 ай бұрын

@@jacob.tudragens That's "no, u". Proving that evolution doesn't exist is indeed just the first step in convincing a non believer. Then you have to answer "okay, but why THIS religion is true and not all those others?" Which is something that really can't be done through KZread comments. It's a spiritual trip we all must undergo on our own.

God makes the most sense, of course. 🙂🙏✝️

@Jewonastick

4 ай бұрын

How does an eternal, immaterial being that poofed everything into existence from nothing make sense?

@somethingtothinkabout167

4 ай бұрын

​@@Jewonastickwhat then would make sense? What is sense but our understanding? Is then nonsense simply our lack of understanding? Christ being raised from the dead may seem like nonsense, but is it really, if even scientist are at work to the exact same thing?

@Jewonastick

4 ай бұрын

@@somethingtothinkabout167 Yes, sense in a way is our understanding and as far as I can tell existence of a being requires it to be physical. My understanding tells me that something cannot be poofed into existence. My understanding is that dead people are dead. Don't know what you were trying to say about scientists.

@mlamber7780

3 ай бұрын

Yes, I agree that God makes the most sense. Sadly, arrogant people who lead immoral lives prefer godlessness. Signs of the times … the End Times. And Jesus did warn us of all this in Matthew 24:4-8. That passage reads like something from today’s headlines. But mockers don’t want to hear the truth.

@Jewonastick

3 ай бұрын

@@somethingtothinkabout167 "even if scientist are at work to the exact same thing"? What the imaginary hell does that even mean? Science isn't trying to raise people from the dead

The title of the video and the descriptive paragraph above explicitly announce the" Only Two Possible Explanations for the Universe," but never once does the speaker even mention the word "universe" in the video. I even copied the entire transcript and pasted it into a text document and did a word search to make sure I had not missed it. Nope, not one mention. Instead all he did was expound on the mutually exclusive explanations for the origin of humans. I agree with AiG on the special creation of man by the God of the Bible, but why didn't someone at AiG apply a little critical thinking when they decided on the title of the video? This reminds me of the time when a YEC speaker came to my church and handed out brochures for a summer camp to teach science and creation. Right on the front of the brochure was written: "Camp Infinity" and on the same side: "Space is limited, register soon." It's not just these careless gaffs, but the lack of critical thinking by YECs in general that turns people off.

@user-jw2kl5ul3v

3 ай бұрын

You have to remember that AiG is a critical-thinking-free organization, except when it comes to thinking up ever more convoluted stories and schemes to con the credulous and the gullible....those are the ones they're absolutely depending on being devoid of critical thinking.

@LukeCh.10verse16-mb8om

3 ай бұрын

The fact is, there is no universe. The 100% false idea of a universe only comes from Godless mankind's religion of scientism.

@Chazd1949

3 ай бұрын

What do you make of the billions of stars and galaxies? Are you saying they do not exist? Are they illusions?@@LukeCh.10verse16-mb8om

@user-jw2kl5ul3v

3 ай бұрын

@@LukeCh.10verse16-mb8om So provide evidence that supports your claim that the universe doesn't exist. As claims go that's a biggie but I won't hold my breath waiting for anything coherent and meaningful from you.

@LukeCh.10verse16-mb8om

3 ай бұрын

@@user-jw2kl5ul3v ,....The Bible is my evidence. If anyone actually understands the Bible and is a Christian, they understand and know that the earth is a flat stationary plane with a dome (firmament) over it. The 100% false manmade idea that the earth is a spinning ball/planet and that there is a universe is all science fiction fantasy, that as I stated only comes from the Godless worlds religion of scientism. There is zero evidence of the earth being a spinning ball and there being a universe. It is all manmade deception. The only people that believe this nonsense are those who do not understand the Bible.

I think many theories could be formed that would be just as “logical” as evolution.

The law of excluded middle only applies to logical propositions - things that must be either true or false. For example, either the God of the Bible exists or he doesn't. He can't half exist, or only exist on Tuesdays. It doesn't apply to choices, that would be ridiculous. There is vanilla icecream and strawberry icecream, therefore by the law of excluded middle there cannot be such a thing as chocolate icecream? That is clearly nonsense. There can be more than just two possible explanations for why the universe exists. In fact there are many possibilities. It might have been created by any one of the thousands of gods that man has believed in over the millennia. Or it might be explained by one of the many unproven hypotheses theories that are currently being discussed. Or, more likely IMHO, we simply don't know and probably never will.

@rubiks6

4 ай бұрын

The question is not "why" the universe exists. The question is "how" - natural processes or processes beyond nature. We know _how_ the universe came to exist. God has told us plainly. He knows. He was there.

@spazzabilly

4 ай бұрын

​@@rubiks6yeah he told us at least twice, Genesis 1 and Genesis 2. They contradict each other and are both wrong. He also told us in all of the other religious books written in the past 8000 years.

@rubiks6

4 ай бұрын

@@spazzabilly - I'll take it from last to first ... There have not been 8000 years. Only 6000. Man has been inventing religions and religious texts ever since Eve misquoted God in chapter 3 of Genesis. That does not mean there is not a true living God who has faithfully communicated the truth to us. Your mission, Jim, should you decide to accept it, is to determine which of the religious texts is actually true. It can be a daunting task but not impossible. The Bible says of God, _"... he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him." There is no contradiction between Genesis 1 and Genesis 2. The same story is given from different perspectives. This is not an uncommon rhetorical device.

@TacoBel

4 ай бұрын

@@spazzabilly Could you please explain how they contradict each other without taking one out of context?

@spazzabilly

4 ай бұрын

@@TacoBel what's the context? They have different orders of creation. You can lie and say "Genesis 2 is just describing one day in more detail" but that's not true, it never states that in the text. It pretty clearly says "there were no plants because there was no water and no one to tend to them". You also have to remember that we KNOW with almost 100% certainty that the sun formed before the earth and before plants, and that animals existed before humans.

Calvin makes incoherent blithering into an art form.

@SavedbyGraceAlone1962

4 ай бұрын

Says the extremist troll who claimed "the theory of evolution proved the fact of evolution". The very definition of incoherence... 😂😂

@VisshanVis

4 ай бұрын

@@SavedbyGraceAlone1962 So is it only evolutionary sciences that you refute and argue against or are there others??.

@SavedbyGraceAlone1962

4 ай бұрын

@@VisshanVis My comment was related to her pathetically incoherent claim. It had nothing to do with refuting science. How could you miss that?

@VisshanVis

4 ай бұрын

@@SavedbyGraceAlone1962 That's not what I asked, re-read my question.

@SavedbyGraceAlone1962

4 ай бұрын

@@VisshanVis Your question is irrelevant. Ask a relevant question to the topic at hand, and i'd be happy to answer it.

5:28 yeah ok

Yes there is a third option Its called molecules

@tonybasoni8443

2 ай бұрын

Wow, are you ever ignorant. Repent!

@mihaleben6051

2 ай бұрын

@@tonybasoni8443 ok i know quarks exist, but molecules is a reasonable start

@babygooboo9985

2 ай бұрын

elaborate then.

Mr. Smith conflates different kinds of questions, and does so to the detriment of his own beliefs and videos. The "excluded middle" comes up for "yes/no" questions, while a possible cause we haven't thought of may come up when we ask "how". And please note that answering that you don't know when you in fact do not know the answer is always a viable and intellectually honest answer. The end of the clip has Mr. Smith spouting his usual nonsense about the modern scientific theory of evolution being on the decline, which is not in accordance with the available data, and his false claim that his own religious beliefs are the _"only logical alternative"_ to it. His claim is false, because his religion is not logical, his religion is not the only religion giving an explanation for our origins, and even if the modern scientific theory of evolution were disproven, there could be a different scientific theory that might explain the facts better in a purely naturalistic way. Here Mr. Smith demonstrates that he either doesn't understand the fundamental difference between the types of questions he introduced in the beginning of the clip, or that he is trying to manipulate his audience to accept his false dichotomy, and then uses their pre-existing antipathy against the theory of evolution to make them believe that his preferred supernatural claims must be the only other solution.

Its god. Wake up

@Bomtombadi1

4 ай бұрын

First, the correct way to put this is “It’s God.” “It’s” vein shirt for IT IS. Second, no IT IS not. Grow up.

@leonardgibney2997

4 ай бұрын

Why would God create pathogens?

@Bomtombadi1

4 ай бұрын

Because sin, of course.

@Vladi.G

4 ай бұрын

@@leonardgibney2997Satan’s greatest goal since he rebelled is to twist the character of God in the eyes of all those who behold Him. One of Satan’s greatest lies is to blame God for all the suffering that Satan brought upon the universe. God did not make pathogens… here is what happened. God is love (1 John 4:16) and His creation is an outflow of this love. Since God is love, He desires the love of His creation. To love, one must have free will. Love without free is no love at all. If I build a robot and program it to tell me that it loves me, force it to "love" me, I can be certain that that robot does not in fact love me because being programmed to "love" someone is no love at all. Since God is love and since He desires the love of His creation, he had to give His creation free will. Now, free will means that someone can choose... and the creation could choose to love God or to not love God. Not to say that it's reasonable to not love the perfectly loving and perfectly sustaining God, but all of creation still had that option. Lucifer was the first to choose to not love God and God allowed Lucifer's choice to reach its full potential. Why did God do that you might ask? Well, it was the first time that anyone had sinned/rebelled against God and He allowed Lucifer's choice to reach its full potential because God is love and he desires the love of His creation. Had God destroyed Lucifer right then and there when he chose to rebel against God, all of creation would have forever been left to wonder if Lucifer was possibly right and all of creation would have followed God out of fear and not out of love. Since God is love and since He desires the love of His creation, He could not bear to have them fear Him for eternity instead of love Him for eternity. That would be a miserable existence for all of His creation for all of eternity. That is not love. Therefore, God allowed the ways of Lucifer, which go directly against the ways of God, to reach their full potential and that's what we can see today on earth. The imperfection of creation and the suffering that we witness and experience is to be a testimony to all of creation that the ways of God are good and that doing anything that goes against His ways will lead to imperfection and to suffering. Once the judgment in heaven is finished and all the angels (and the rest of creation outside of earth) see that God is just and that His ways are good, Jesus Christ will return to earth and forever destroy sin and all those who love sin (Side note: The unrighteous are destroyed at the end. Eternal conscious torment in hell is not a Biblical teaching and I can clearly show you this in the Bible. God is perfectly merciful and just). After sin and suffering are forever destroyed, all of creation will have no doubt that the ways of God are good and all of creation will desire to follow God out of complete love. Therefore, "trouble will not rise up a second time" (Nahum 1:9). Basically, God is incredibly merciful, wise, and just and He is enduring great suffering to see His beloved creation suffer for this short while because He knows that His character and His ways have been questioned. If His creation is to love Him and understand that He is good, they must see where sin, transgression of God's law (1 John 3:4), leads. I hope that makes sense. I assure you that God is good and if you seek Him and earnestly desire Him, He will come and dwell with you and the more you learn, the more you will see just how good and loving He is.

@Vladi.G

4 ай бұрын

@@leonardgibney2997​​⁠Satan’s greatest goal since he rebelled is to twist the character of God in the eyes of all those who behold Him. One of Satan’s greatest lies is to blame God for all the suffering that Satan brought upon the universe. God did not make pathogens… here is what happened. God is love (1 John 4:16) and His creation is an outflow of this love. Since God is love, He desires the love of His creation. To love, one must have free will. Love without free is no love at all. If I build a robot and program it to tell me that it loves me, force it to "love" me, I can be certain that that robot does not in fact love me because being programmed to "love" someone is no love at all. Since God is love and since He desires the love of His creation, he had to give His creation free will. Now, free will means that someone can choose... and the creation could choose to love God or to not love God. Not to say that it's reasonable to not love the perfectly loving and perfectly sustaining God, but all of creation still had that option. Lucifer was the first to choose to not love God and God allowed Lucifer's choice to reach its full potential. Why did God do that you might ask? Well, it was the first time that anyone had sinned/rebelled against God and He allowed Lucifer's choice to reach its full potential because God is love and he desires the love of His creation. Had God destroyed Lucifer right then and there when he chose to rebel against God, all of creation would have forever been left to wonder if Lucifer was possibly right and all of creation would have followed God out of fear and not out of love. Since God is love and since He desires the love of His creation, He could not bear to have them fear Him for eternity instead of love Him for eternity. That would be a miserable existence for all of His creation for all of eternity. That is not love. Therefore, God allowed the ways of Lucifer, which go directly against the ways of God, to reach their full potential and that's what we can see today on earth. The imperfection of creation and the suffering that we witness and experience is to be a testimony to all of creation that the ways of God are good and that doing anything that goes against His ways will lead to imperfection and to suffering. Once the judgment in heaven is finished and all the angels (and the rest of creation outside of earth) see that God is just and that His ways are good, Jesus Christ will return to earth and forever destroy sin and all those who love sin (Side note: The unrighteous are destroyed at the end. Eternal conscious torment in hell is not a Biblical teaching and I can clearly show you this in the Bible. God is perfectly merciful and just). After sin and suffering are forever destroyed, all of creation will have no doubt that the ways of God are good and all of creation will desire to follow God out of complete love. Therefore, "trouble will not rise up a second time" (Nahum 1:9). Basically, God is incredibly merciful, wise, and just and He is enduring great suffering to see His beloved creation suffer for this short while because He knows that His character and His ways have been questioned. If His creation is to love Him and understand that He is good, they must see where sin, transgression of God's law (1 John 3:4), leads. I hope that makes sense. I assure you that God is good and if you seek Him and earnestly desire Him, He will come and dwell with you and the more you learn, the more you will see just how good and loving He is.

4:02 *points to rope*

well, the reason there can't be a 3rd option is because then there'd be a 4th and so on. Folks that want to control other folks, first have to convince them, that they have no other options. For instance... The entire universe exists, because I farted. They know it is not true... but they can't prove or disprove it.

This argument is the classic false dichotomy fallacy - if evolution is false then creation by God must be true. There are actually *three* options: 1. Life's diversity is due to evolution. 2. Life's diversity is due to *another currently unknown natural process.* 3. Goddidit. Eliminating 1) *doesn't* exclude other naturalistic explanations in 2) and doesn't provide evidence 3) must be correct. Calvin Smith understands basic logic as little as he understands the evolutionary sciences.

@robertulrich3964

4 ай бұрын

@samburns9350 you . "unknown natural process", there's a name for that. its called naturalism. if you want to break objects down into particles and let's say, come up with a new theory such as quantum fluctuations in space-time "do things". you're still working with a non-directed process, i.e. no God. Thus, any other possible explanation exo facto, has to be completely random, no matter its origin.

@samburns9350

4 ай бұрын

@@robertulrich3964 Another guy who doesn't understand the false dichotomy fallacy.

@robertulrich3964

4 ай бұрын

@@samburns9350easy to throw out a fallacy term instead of refute argument points. Still waiting to hear about any natural process has to, by definition exclude an omnipotent being since it's literally your 3rd premise! Which mean by any logical reasoning, randomness has to occur, no matter the "unknown process" 3rd option.

@samburns9350

4 ай бұрын

@@robertulrich3964 Pointing out Calvin is using a logical fallacy is a refutation of his argument. Too bad if you don't understand basic logic.

@robertulrich3964

4 ай бұрын

@@samburns9350 let's exclude any AD hominem. A very basic question. Do you believe the second option could be non-random?

There's so much wrong with this presentation, it's hard to know where to start. 1 Evolution is the theory of how we have such a diversity of life. It is not, and has never been, a theory of how the Universe or life itself began. 2, In logic to negate the theory of excluded middle, you need two mutually exclusive propositions. e.g. The Christian God is the creator of life on Earth or the Christian God is not the creator of life on Earth. The reason for life cannot lie outside one of these categories. 3 The Universe doesn't owe us an explanation for its / our existence. This may be an unsatisfying thought but making up any old explanation isn't a better option.

@logicianbones

4 ай бұрын

1. Strawman, not what he's talking about by generalized evolutionary ultimate origins (non-God). He made this crystal clear. 2. God or Not-God is mutually exclusive. The rest of what you said here strawmans it as about the Christian God specifically in this argument. 3. So?

@philwhitehouse4290

4 ай бұрын

@@logicianbones His point that life is the result of evolution or a creator is false. Regardless of how you want to try and redefine evolution. No strawmen to see here. 'Not God' isn't a thing. Not God can't cause anything. To use logic correctly you could say it's either the case that a God created life or it's not the case that a God created life. Funny how you want to leave out the Christian part when a Bible is shown in an illustration as he's making his point and the video ends with a Bible verse, but he's not saying the creator God IS the Christian one? Same with the murder / accident analogy. You've got all the work ahead of you to go from there was a murder to the name of the actual perpetrator even if anyone accepts the first part.

Even creationists admit that evolution is true. No one thinks that God created a cocka-doodle-poodle 6000 years ago. So even they don't try to argue that every living species was created 6000 years ago. Creationists just try to argue that there is a "limit" (without explaining how that limit actually works) to how far evolution can go. So to claim that it must either be all God or all evolution is a false dichotomy.

***so ! prove it***

@somethingtothinkabout167

4 ай бұрын

Prove to a rock that you exist. You inability makes you incapable and your unwillingness causes you to be unwilling to accept any and all evidence especially you cannot articulate what such evidence would or must look like.

@LukeCh.10verse16-mb8om

3 ай бұрын

@@somethingtothinkabout167 ,...Correct, no amount of actual truth given to the spiritually dead and blind will mean nor change a thing. They are 100% incapable of understanding truth. They only understand lies and deception and this is why they become snared into the Godless worlds religion of scientism.

Odin & his brothers, Vili and Ve, created the universe. Prove me wrong.

@rubiks6

4 ай бұрын

Odin and his brothers are dead and relegated to being historical fictional figures. The true, living God is still worshiped today. His Word is honored by billions of people - today.

@HangrySaturn

4 ай бұрын

@@rubiks6 Odin & his brethren are real. You're all just denying the facts because you're trying to push your creationist agenda. There's overwhelming evidence to support it.

@j.bergland6887

4 ай бұрын

HangrySaturn, if you don't believe in God, just say so instead of saying ridiculous stuff.

@HangrySaturn

4 ай бұрын

​@@j.bergland6887 Believing in Odin is equally ridiculous as believing in God.

@kevinburke1325

4 ай бұрын

​@@HangrySaturnnope, keep going John Balnis Bot.

This is a false dichotomy. Evolution has nothing to say about how life or the universe came about. There is no contradiction in accepting Evolution and belief in a creator (theistic or deistic). It clearly contradicts a literal interpretation of genesis. But that is not the same thing

@larrybedouin2921

4 ай бұрын

Yes there is. It says that God lied.

@samburns9350

4 ай бұрын

@@larrybedouin2921 God doesn't lie but some of his fanatical followers do so every chance they get.

@larrybedouin2921

4 ай бұрын

@@samburns9350 I never said that God lies. Evolution does by implication.

@samburns9350

4 ай бұрын

@@larrybedouin2921 I never said God lies. It's his creationist followers who do so all the time.

@larrybedouin2921

4 ай бұрын

@@samburns9350 If you believe God then you would believe his word.

Wow. They go to school and they learn some facts (and some falsehoods) but they really don't learn to think rationally.

@jockyoung4491

4 ай бұрын

Believing only what you believe is not proof of rationality, especially when it is based on faith.

@fabianwittmann8121

4 ай бұрын

There is a huge difference between Creator vs. no Creator The christian God vs. Evolution One describes opposites, the other doesn't.

@rubiks6

4 ай бұрын

@@jockyoung4491 - My faith is based on evidence. What is yours based on?

@rubiks6

4 ай бұрын

@@fabianwittmann8121 - To what opposites do you refer?

@fabianwittmann8121

4 ай бұрын

@@rubiks6 the opposite to the christian God is not Evolution.

Man i thought brainwashing was technology. Turns out its just words. (What even are the comments)

It happened just like Genesis said it did! The earth is only thousands of years old!

@Bomtombadi1

4 ай бұрын

Oh, you sweet summer child

@therick363

4 ай бұрын

There’s no scientific evidence for that

@zaney1956

4 ай бұрын

Same evidence Godless confused scientist use but creation science comes up with completely different answers.I was once a brainwashed retard from public school system that believed all them fairy tales about millions of years and ape like men till I got old enough to think for myself and find the truth and homeschool my three kids. God confounds and confuses the wicked with their lies something came from nothing? Please! God bless and may he take the scales off youre eyes. Check out creation science! Thousands of hours of it oh you tube.@@therick363

@therick363

4 ай бұрын

@@zaney1956would you like to have an adult conversation or will your replies be filled with insults, disrespect and condescending and lack of evidence?

@zaney1956

4 ай бұрын

I speak truth only! I dont want to dwell on made up theroies and made up evolution. Like going back to first grade once youre eyes and mind have found the truth and the real creator!@@therick363

People will jump through ridiculous hoops in order to try to reason their god into existence

@michaellowe2305

4 ай бұрын

From where I stand , people will jump through hoops to reason God away

@nikorn24

4 ай бұрын

@@michaellowe2305 It might be the complete lack of evidence 🤷

@michaellowe2305

4 ай бұрын

@@nikorn24 such as the lack of evidence for something coming from nothing?

@HangrySaturn

4 ай бұрын

@@michaellowe2305 Oh boy, here go the strawman again!

@nikorn24

4 ай бұрын

@@michaellowe2305 Oh wow it's been like a whole 3 hours since I've heard a theist use that ridiculous tired old strawman of an argument

The genealogy in Luke gives Christs family tree which arrives back at Adam, and Eve, a pair, just like when you go from the tips of the roots of a tree, it arrives back at the trunk. Why are people willing to suspend their rationality for suppositions which have no basis in fact. We all have lineages which go back to Adam, and Eve, it's not been that long people.

@Bomtombadi1

4 ай бұрын

Okay, so the bible traces lineage right back to Adam and Eve. Why should we take this seriously?

@michaelyork4554

4 ай бұрын

@@Bomtombadi1 Because anyone with a functioning brain knows how lineage works, and can dismiss as nonsense what any manmade theory with an agenda rooted in atheism attempts to deceive us with.

@jockyoung4491

4 ай бұрын

@@michaelyork4554 I think the point is: how do you know the lineage in the Bible is true? If you have faith that it is, that's fine, but please don't claim it as scientific evidence of anything.

@Jewonastick

4 ай бұрын

​@@michaelyork4554​ Anyone with a functioning brain also understands that snakes and donkeys don't talk, virgins don't give birth, walking on water is impossible, sticks don't turn into snakes, bread doesn't rain from the sky, the world isn't 6000 years old, there never was a magical zoo boat built by a 600 year old man, splitting oceans is bullshit and living inside a fish for days is just a fkn joke.......

@tims5268

4 ай бұрын

@@michaelyork4554the bible is a man made attempt to deceive.

While I’m a believer of Genesis…Could a third option not be an assembly of evil creatorS ? Devils advocate 😅

No need for a third option, it was evolution. All the evidence points to evolution, and we can see evolution happening every day.

@roydodds3693

4 ай бұрын

well played, sir

@calvinsmith7575

4 ай бұрын

Evolution has never been observed...

@somerandom3247

4 ай бұрын

@@calvinsmith7575 Yes it has. Is your dna a direct clone of one of your parents? Or is it a mishmash of both, with a few mutations mixed in? It's the second one.... Which is evolution.

@calvinsmith7575

4 ай бұрын

@@somerandom3247 You are saying (publicly) that the process of procreation (inheriting half your DNA from your mother and father resulting in a reshuffling of pre-existing genetic information) combined with degenerative genetic mutations equals 'evolution'? : ). Seriously? Is that what the state run school system is teaching students now, that the mechanisms of reproduction is 'evolution'? Wow! No wonder our society is degenerating so rapidly...

@therick363

4 ай бұрын

@@calvinsmith7575why is evolution a scientific theory?

What a self defeating claim 😂 if we had already thought of a third option it wouldn’t be ‘a third option we haven’t thought of’ would it Calvin? 😂 Just when I thought this channel couldn’t get any dumber they start trying to argue with people that are honest enough to say they don’t know.

@TruthEvangelism

4 ай бұрын

I pray the Lord convict you of your sin and bring you to a saving faith in the Lord Jesus. Here’s a picture of where your headed, dead in your trespasses and sins, “ Revelation 21:8 8 But the cowardly, the unbelieving, the vile, the murderers, the sexually immoral, those who practice magic arts, the idolaters and all liars-they will be consigned to the fiery lake of burning sulfur. This is the second death” 2 Thessalonians 1:9 9 They will be punished with everlasting destruction and shut out from the presence of the Lord and from the glory of his might” Matthew 13:50 50 and throw them into the blazing furnace, where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth. Matthew 25:41 41 “Then he will say to those on his left, ‘Depart from me, you who are cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels But there is hope of eternal life in Jesus Christ, who was the perfect God man and lived the perfect life that me and you could not, and was the propitiation, the atoning sacrifice for the sins of all who would believe in Him past present and future. And on the third day, He was resurrected bodily in glory for our justification and was The Father accepting this worthy sacrifice. And He ascended to the right hand of the Father where He is interceding for believers daily and is awaiting His second coming. And all who will put their faith in Him as their Lord and Savior and repent, turn away from their sin and turn towards Christ, will be saved from eternal death, where the fire is never quenched and the worm never dies, “Ephesians 2:8-9 8 For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, 9 not a result of works, so that no one may boast

@mirandahotspring4019

4 ай бұрын

True, but it is entertaining, and I love the way Canadians pronounce "about' as aboot.

@Zebhammer

4 ай бұрын

And I love the way atheist faith is blind faith.

@mirandahotspring4019

4 ай бұрын

@@Zebhammer No "faith" required at all. just reason, rationality, and logic.

@jockyoung4491

4 ай бұрын

@@Zebhammer All faith is blind, dear. That's why they call it faith.

Its GOD no close second

False, as it is critical and logical to accept ignorance. In fact, not to do so is illogical and a denial of critical thinking. The whole basis of mental inquiry into any subject is to gain knowledge and remove ignorance. The notion of either/or is merely a strawman argument to push a certain agenda.

@jockyoung4491

4 ай бұрын

Exactly. That's the difference between faith and science. But they don't know HOW to think critically, and wouldn't want to even if they did.

Unless you can explain how this god did it you’re not offering an explanation. God isn’t even an option.

@HS-zk5nn

4 ай бұрын

how much was darwin paid for publishing moist? 🥦🥦

@Bomtombadi1

4 ай бұрын

A god CAN be an option. We just don’t accept the arguments or evidence presented. I’m always willing to be convinced, but even apologists such as WLC are lazy in their thinking. The only effort they put into their work is heat puffing verbosity.

@jockyoung4491

4 ай бұрын

@@HS-zk5nn Darwin wasn't paid anything for anything. He was independently wealthy. Now what does that have to do with the science of evolution?

@Moist._Robot

4 ай бұрын

@@HS-zk5nn Click on newest first as it hid my comment from that thread. And your numerous comments still didn’t answer my question that was asked before yours. The first edition was only 100 copies. But nowhere near the millions of dollars Ken ham makes.

@Moist._Robot

4 ай бұрын

@@Bomtombadi1 It may be an option but it’s not an explanation.

I'm starting to think this is actually a comedy channel and these guys are geniuses who have fooled us all along. No, no, I've heard them defend their nonsensical arguments without evidence way to many times. They aren't smart enough to pull something like that off.

@annieoaktree6774

4 ай бұрын

It's simply a channel for soliciting donation $$$ from the science illiterate True Believers. As P.T Barnum once noted, "there's a sucker born every minute."

@macruz8503

3 ай бұрын

Answer me this. How can something be created out of nothing?

Another false dichotomy: It must either be evolution or the Biblical God. If evolution were proved false, that doesn't prove there is a God, or if there is a God, that it is the God of the Bible.

🤦 Another creationist who "destroys" evolutionary theory, while demonstrating that he doesn’t know what it is. Leaving that aside, I agree aliens only kick the can down the road, same as a a creator god. Where did it come from? And you can't say "my god lives outside of time because he's special, in fact he's so special thats not even special pleading"! UNLESS you can demonstrate you know what time is. 'Cause I'm betting a lot of you don't know.

@LukeCh.10verse16-mb8om

3 ай бұрын

The Bible is the only truth the world has. Godless mankind's theory of evolution is a 100% fake manmade fraud. One only has to have the slightest bit of intelligence to understand this.

@therick363

2 ай бұрын

@@LukeCh.10verse16-mb8omso you don’t understand science! Just say that next time. That or you think it’s okay to lie.

Not knowing how the universe got here does not prove any particular origin story. It just proves that we don't know. But we DO know how biological evolution works. There is nothing illogical or impossible about that.

@Itzascript

4 ай бұрын

Give me examples of how biological evolution works.

@jockyoung4491

4 ай бұрын

@@Itzascript Dog breeds are one of the best examples. A Chihuahuas is not a wolf. And that happened in only a few thousand years.

@rubiks6

4 ай бұрын

@@jockyoung4491 - Dog breeds are the results of intelligent design. First, there is the diversity programmed into the original dogs' DNA for adaptation. Second, there is Man's controlled interference in the breeding of dogs. You picked perhaps the worst example you could to try and demonstrate "evolution."

@jockyoung4491

4 ай бұрын

@@rubiks6 Yes, the selection was provided by humans, but it is the same thing. It doesn't matter where the selection comes from. The point is that when certain traits are favored the species evolves in that direction. We see this all the time, even in nature. Evolution continues happening in nature as fast it it always has. In fact, dog breeds have changed FASTER than anything in the fossil record.

@rubiks6

4 ай бұрын

@@jockyoung4491 - Has there ever been bred from dogs anything that is not a dog? Has there ever been bred from horses anything that is not a horse? Has there ever been bred from stone-fruit trees anything that is not a stone-fruit tree? The intelligent God that created all life has programmed into the DNA of creatures and plants diversity and adaptability but there is no "last common universal ancestor." _"... dog breeds have changed FASTER than anything in the fossil record."_ Of course, they have. That's because intelligent Man has controlled the breeding of some dogs. That is not "nature." Yet, dogs still only produce dogs, never any other kind of creature. When a dog gives birth to a kitten (they do look quite similar) let me know.

Wrong again Calvin. There aren't two possible explanations, there is only one explanation and you know what that is my fellow evolved and very modern ape. I taught science, and of course evolution, at a couple of Catholic schools, Kavanaugh College and St Paul's High School. They had no problem with evolution, they just added the caveat that it was "guided by god."

@calvinsmith7575

4 ай бұрын

Exactly. They were intellectually inconsistent and illogical. And of course- evolution has never been observed… 🙂

@mirandahotspring4019

4 ай бұрын

@@calvinsmith7575 Calvin, you know evolution has been observed. Stop being intellectually dishonest!

@larrybedouin2921

4 ай бұрын

​@@mirandahotspring4019 That is a lie.

@mirandahotspring4019

4 ай бұрын

@@larrybedouin2921 I do not lie! Evolution has been observed, despite what Calvin says. The peppered moth, the greenish warbler, and even the resistance to antibiotics in bacteria are all examples of evolution that have been observed.

@larrybedouin2921

4 ай бұрын

@@mirandahotspring4019 That is not evolution. There is no new information. Diversity is embedded in the dna.

God is Love. 🕊️

@tonybasoni8443

2 ай бұрын

You have spoken in total ignorance and have shown that you know nothing. So, how many times have you read the Bible from the first page to the last page straight through without stopping (daily)? If you or anyone else has not read the Bible from beginning to end repeatedly, they have no business making any comments about anything. They will only make ignorant comments like you have. Repent, read the entire Bible and learn what the truth actually is.

@GeemailMailboxx

2 ай бұрын

@@tonybasoni8443 from the first page to the last page without stopping (daily) ?😳🤯 Damn it Spock! I'm a human not a machine! 🤖 I don't think I could read anything from the beginnin to the end Everyday. (Not even a napkin) ☺️ So I guess I'm not that smart. 🤕🤫

Creation is not opposed to evolution. Christians proposed the roots of evolution centuries ago.

@calvinsmith7575

4 ай бұрын

So God used billions of years of death, suffering and disease to 'create' and called it very good, all before Adam sinned...?

@jockyoung4491

4 ай бұрын

@@calvinsmith7575 If that's what you want to believe. The billions of years of death happened either way. Those fossils are not still alive.

@kerwinbrown4180

4 ай бұрын

@@calvinsmith7575 I go through so much suffering to pass a test. Why won't those instructors just let me pass without any work?

@mattbrook-lee7732

4 ай бұрын

​@@calvinsmith7575evolution is not opposed to creation. It is opposed to a literal interpretation of genesis. Not the same thing

Hit that like plz thumbs-up helps spread the word ❤❤

Why do you need a third option? Evolution.

The real thing we should ponder is how evolution might be part of creation. In other words God creates a system and it evolves over time. In similar way to how modern computers and networking has evolved since being created.

@calvinsmith7575

4 ай бұрын

That would be saying God used billions of years of death, suffering and disease to 'create' and called it 'very good', all before Adam sinned....

@Bomtombadi1

4 ай бұрын

@@calvinsmith7575right and so that can’t be because it conflicts with what YOU assert to be true

@jayb5596

4 ай бұрын

@@calvinsmith7575 AI can process and perform operations in the nanosecond range of perception. So essentially in a single second an AI could experience a parrallel timeline of many seconds or conscious operations. So you see there would be a metaphysical and physical side of the story and they would overlap. So you would be irrationally conflating the two by lack of sound understanding of the parallel timelines. A day to the Lord is like 1000 years to a man. That's biblical and it seems rational with modern technological advancements. You would have to first understand there is a God outside which all the knowledge proceeded from. Then there is the metaphysical manifestation which hasn't experienced a physical presence you know a conscience without a conscious experience. 1 2 3 4 1000/24=41.666 666 666 666 67 which is 1 hour being equal in experience to 41.67 years to a man. Also you see the four beast and their king in that equation? So again science and theology have a shared testimony, parrallel timelines being prophesied and manifest. You know the two witnesses of revelation right? Have you not heard their testimony friend? Lets do it like this, Lord, Lord have we not prophesied in thy name, and cast out demons in thy name, and in thy name done many wonderful works? Yeah theology prophesies and cast out demons and science does many wonderful works. Have you not heard their testimony?

@jayb5596

4 ай бұрын

@@calvinsmith7575 Are you aware of the difference between metaphysical and physical? Or parallel timelines for that matter? You might be conflating parallel timelines and metaphysical and physical manifestations.

@SavedbyGraceAlone1962

4 ай бұрын

In that case, God was just making things up when he said humans were made from the dust of the ground.

I’m sorry, but your argument is not going to win anyone over to Christianity. Just because you can’t come up with a third option doesn’t mean there’s not one. Think of a football team. They’ve been trying to figure out a better way to get the ball down the field All season. Should we do a running play or a passing play? That’s the only two options that are available. Oh wait, how about we do a flea flicker, because that’s kind of a combination of running, and passing. Before anybody thought of it, it was not a possibility. Besides, even if you do believe in a creator, which I do by the way, it’s not necessarily the god that’s described in the Bible. I will say once again for the 1 millionth time, the Bible was written by men, and men can say anything they want. Anyone can claim that God spoke to them, or God influenced them. History is full of such claims.

@mlamber7780

3 ай бұрын

The Bible is full of evidence for God’s existence. You see, the Bible isn’t an ordinary book. It was written by men who wrote under the power of the Holy Spirit. Consequently, they did not interject their own viewpoints or opinions nor did they have the luxury to exclude things they didn’t like. You know, you try so hard to sound intelligent and sophisticated with your football analogy but one day the truth will stare you directly in the face and on that day you won’t be able to tackle Him. ~ John 14:6

@briansransom

3 ай бұрын

@@mlamber7780 wow you really have a way of sharing your faith, calling me stupid, saying I’m “trying” to sound intelligent. Maybe you should work on your preaching before you preach. I believe in God. But I don’t believe in the Bible or the God of the Bible because it was written by men. Who told you it was inspired by God? Let me guess, men (that includes women). Men wrote it, and men have been telling each other ever since that it was inspired by God. That doesn’t prove anything. If you’re so brilliant, tell me why there are so many religions that are all sure of their story, and at the same time so positive that everyone else got it wrong and most of them are going to hell. Are Jews going to hell because they refuse to accept Jesus Christ as their savior? According to the Bible, they are.

You aren’t specifying what you’re talking about, but merely conflating origin of the universe with diversity of life in earth.

@jockyoung4491

4 ай бұрын

To them it is all the same thing. "Evolution" = atheism = anything we don't like.

@Bomtombadi1

4 ай бұрын

@@jockyoung4491 basically yeah.

@Bomtombadi1

4 ай бұрын

@@stingingnettle9726 if he is, then he is not doing a good job. From my understanding, theistic evolution is when god creates everything, and gives life a start, but does nothing after that.

@jockyoung4491

4 ай бұрын

@@stingingnettle9726 Theistic evolution seems like a valid attempt to reconcile faith and science, although they don't have much to do with each other. Whether or not God exists, evolution happened.

@rubiks6

4 ай бұрын

The _"origin of the universe"_ and the _"diversity of life in [sic] earth"_ have the same cause - God.

The big part of the problem is that too many of your preachers don't know enough about science to be able to see through the evolutionist lies.

@Bomtombadi1

4 ай бұрын

lol - and you think that if they did understand it they’d see through the lies?

@therick363

4 ай бұрын

What are the evolutionist lies?

@jockyoung4491

4 ай бұрын

They don't know enough about science to even try to argue against evolution scientifically.

Then you ask ok and where did the universe come from and you're back to only creation as a possibility.

@therick363

4 ай бұрын

No you’re not. There is still a natural possibility

@Jewonastick

4 ай бұрын

What's the difference between it being a creation or it being the result of an unknown natural process?

@samburns9350

4 ай бұрын

@@Jewonastick The supernatural creation option is not scientific.

@Jewonastick

4 ай бұрын

@@samburns9350 i know...yet @version135 sees i as an option

@LukeCh.10verse16-mb8om

3 ай бұрын

There is no such thing as a universe. The 100% false idea of a universe only comes from Godless mankind's religion of scientism.

The universe according to science was 13.7 billion years but now according to them the universe has been found to be 26 billion years old.

@Bomtombadi1

4 ай бұрын

Nope. That’s not what they say. That is based off one study.

@jockyoung4491

4 ай бұрын

There are different ways to estimate the age of the universe, none of them very precise. We have a much better handle on the age of the earth, since we can measure it directly.

@mattbrook-lee7732

4 ай бұрын

Might as well split the difference and call it 6000 then

@CaptainFantastic222

4 ай бұрын

Gupta’s theiry hasn’t been proven yet but you demonstrate the amazing thing about science! There are no absolutes in science. No idea or theory is not subject to change or revision based on new evidence!

The third option in the case of murder vs natural causes question is obviously suicide, (what a dumb question). The third option in the creation vs evolution question does not exist. In fact the second option does not exist either, (another really dumb question). That debate was settled with the discovery of DNA and the verifiable, observable knowledge that the universe is expanding and has existed for billions of years. The reason science is unable to answer all questions is simply that it has not yet had the time. Be patient.

@jockyoung4491

4 ай бұрын

To be fair, it can answer questions only about the material universe, amd then only if evidence is accessible. But that covers quite a bit.

@derekdurst2146

4 ай бұрын

@@jockyoung4491 What evidence is there for anything other than a material universe, that hasn't been manufactured by man's imagination, fear, and fantasy?

@jockyoung4491

4 ай бұрын

@@derekdurst2146 The point is that science can't say the supernatural does NOT exist any more than it can say it DOES exist. So people are free to believe anything they want to about it. As long as they don't try to call it science, I have no problem with that.

@derekdurst2146

4 ай бұрын

@@jockyoung4491 That's true. At least to a point. The problem comes when one group of people make the claim that their own imaginary, supernatural being is better than someone else's imaginary, supernatural being but neither one can offer verifiable, observable proof as science requires, only an unshakable opinion, belief, or "faith". That invariably leads to conflict, violence, and bloodshed. And THAT my friend, is the history of religion in a nutshell.

@gregoryt8792

4 ай бұрын

@@derekdurst2146The proof is - mathematical odds so great no one should dispute them, archaeology so rock solid nothing has been found to disprove the biblical narrative, prophecy so remarkable and linguistically accurate it should astound you. The only question you should ask is where would you like to spend eternity?

Cognitive dissonance is currently being accepted as a rational answer. 🤣🤣🤣

@Vernon-Chitlen

4 ай бұрын

You mean those that believe certain elements out of 98 arranged themselves into a cell capable of evolving for the same reason tapestries and baskets weave themselves?

@rubiks6

4 ай бұрын

Meaningless post. Stop wasting our time.

@cptrikester2671

4 ай бұрын

@@rubiks6 I disagree, it wasn't meaningless. There is a certain group of people that 'talk out of both sides of their mouth' but never acknowledge that their statements disagree with each other. They expect people to accept both responses as valid. Unacceptable, and usually from a liberal mind.

We DO NOT live on a spinning ball! Funny thing is- the Bible tells us this in Genesis 1. So much for "Answers" in Genesis.

@jockyoung4491

4 ай бұрын

What does it matter what the Bible says, when you can go outside and see for yourself?

@calvinsmith7575

4 ай бұрын

No. No it doesn’t.

@Bomtombadi1

4 ай бұрын

@@calvinsmith7575calvin, I have also read Genesis 1. You are actually wrong here.

@Bomtombadi1

4 ай бұрын

@@calvinsmith7575the bible tells you in genesis 1 that the earth was formless and void. Where in that passage does it say a sphere or spinning ball? Please explain.

@jannaswanson271

4 ай бұрын

@@calvinsmith7575 Does the Bible say that the Earth moves? No. Does is say it has a foundation and pillars? Yes. What is the one thing Yahuah created on the second day of Creation? Are we not in a spiritual war for our minds, for our hearts, for our very souls?

Evolution is not an explanation of the origin of the universe. There is only 1 plausible explaination of the universe. God.

@samburns9350

4 ай бұрын

Which God? Humans have invented several thousand and all claim to be the only TRUE God.

@therick363

4 ай бұрын

There is only one plausible explanation of the universe-a natural one

@user-jw2kl5ul3v

4 ай бұрын

Since when has magic been demonstrated to be the explanation for anything?