That awful excuse may have passed public opinion in the 80's but we know far better now. No way possible fuel vapor blew the nose off a airliner!! Just not possible.

@marcelobalbinot8019

6 ай бұрын

Read more. All the details.... Took NTSB a good amount of time to draw the conclusion that you don't believe in.

@Bob31415

10 күн бұрын

@@marcelobalbinot8019 Want to know how many eyewitnesses your beloved NTSB called to testify before their inquiry? Exactly *zero* . Why? Because their eyewitness accounts (which all agreed with one another) didn't support their made up story.

In 2022, former Navy Operations Specialist William H. Teele, III from the U.S.S. Carr (FFG-52) came forward as a whistle blower, reporting that the U.S. Navy accidentally shot down TWA Flight 800. The USS Carr was taking part in the CEC Training Exercise on July 17, 1996, testing its new AN/SPY-1 Alpha radar, as well as new AN/SPS 49 radar. For this simulated air attack, the target was to be a drone. Teele's mission as operations specialist was to operate radar and associated equipment, identify and maintain a display (plot) of the movement of ships, aircraft, missiles, and natural objects detected by observation radar. The USS Carr began a combat systems ship qualification test. The goal was to certify her newly installed MK 92 Mod 6 fire system. The ship's crew was specifically testing its new AN/SPY-1 Alpha radar, as well as new AN/SPS 49 radar for this simulated air attack. Operations specialist Teele was among the personnel monitoring this activity from within the ships combat information center (CIC). The CIC was created to integrate the information coming from each of the combatants sensors-range, bearing, elevation, doppler updates, etc. and feed the integrated picture back to the individual, Teele explained. One ship could track the assumed enemy, while the other ship could fire. Teele described the assumed enemy drone was supposed to be "a low, slow flier flying toward us. I believe we jumped the gun. We had a track on a contact that came out that fit the profile we were given." But it was, in fact, TWA 800 and NOT the target drone. Then, horrifically, TWA 800 became the "assumed enemy". Says Teele, "it matched the drill parameters perfectly." He believes that two missiles were fired from the USS Lexte Gulf. Over his head set, Teele heard the announcement "Birds away, salvo size two. Stand by for BDA (Battle Damage Assessment)". A few minutes later, he heard "splash", meaning that the missiles had hit their target. Astonishingly, soon after that, Teele heard somebody say, "Wait, whoa, whoa, whoa" and another person added, "Wait a minute. We hit an air bus!!!!". Then, somebody came over the radio ordering "Radio Silence!". Teele's leading petty officer made it extremely clear to him that he was to say nothing of what he saw and heard. "My Chief and the Ops Boss came back into the CIC & said "the drill's over, we gotta do some maneuver drills." These fast, evasive maneuvers of ships in W-105 moving away from the crash site are consistent with the Coast Guard surface radar tapes. Teele said, "We then ran to Bermuda, where we were not allowed to leave the ship. No phone calls, emails secured, and nothing was to be discussed...."

@nickv4073

10 ай бұрын

Just curious. Do you hear the Twilight Zone theme song in yor head all the time or only when you remove the tin foil hat.

@raywest3834

10 ай бұрын

@@nickv4073 When you know very little about the subject under discussion, don't be a wise guy. Throughout history, there have been many conspiracies. "Only small secrets need to be protected, the large ones remain secret through public incredulity." --- Marshall McLuhan

@change_your_oil_regularly4287

10 ай бұрын

@@raywest3834 wow profound 🤣

@limeyosu2000

10 ай бұрын

This makes the most sense as witness’s on the ground saw a streak head towards the plane. I also heard a report that several crew members from the navy ship committed suicide.

@brianallison1913

10 ай бұрын

I always have and still do favor the notion that it was intentionally shot down. Why I have no clue but it has always struck me as odd that the military would be using live munitions right in the path of commercial airlines. I know one time when I was looking over the list of people who perished on the plane one was a defense industry specialist. Whether or not that is a position where one could possess the detrimental top secret information to warrant shooting a whole plane down I don't know. I still just have a feeling that it was intentional.

11:42 made me choke on my drink.😭☹️💜

Hey, thanks for uploading this. This is literally the documentary that got me into aviation safety. I remember seeing it when I was in Jr high school. I now produce aviation safety training videos.

My parents and Aunt and uncle were supposed to be on that flight. Thank God my uncle became sick before hand and they had to cancel and reschedule their flight.

@sisterhyde7952

15 күн бұрын

Lucky them, my classmate Céline wasn't so lucky.

RIP To the passengers and crew of TWA Flight 800

There’s a book about it called Night Fall. Very interesting read.

I knew Pam, Shannon and Katy Lychner. Such a shock. Saw Pam and Katy at dog groomer just days before. Pam spoke of their upcoming trip. Wanted dog groomed before the trip. I think of that conversation often.

@daviddavis3389

4 ай бұрын

So did they take there dog (s) with them?

@cherylbean5881

4 ай бұрын

@@daviddavis3389 No Abbey stayed at kennels. Joe took care of Abbey. He eventually gave her to one of rhe girl's friends.

@daviddavis3389

4 ай бұрын

@@cherylbean5881 thanks Cheryl for the update! It's good to hear a happy ending.. of course, dogs need true love & they need us humans to feed them and ensure that they receive the things for a happy life..

This particular 747 was one of the first built in 1970. It was scheduled to be retired later that yr. Sam Donaldson, the first Don LaMon Lemon

@framedthunder6436

Жыл бұрын

that plane is from 1971 it was a renew variant of the original 747

@tashalynn29

Жыл бұрын

Off topic I LOVE your profile pic... Pan Am, another gone but not forgotten

@robshef718

Жыл бұрын

@@framedthunder6436 Variant? its a plane, not a virus.

@LathropLdST

9 ай бұрын

​@@robshef718variant, yes. Too young to remember another use for that word?

@LynxStarAuto

9 ай бұрын

⁠@@robshef718Nothing wrong with the use of variant there.

I'll never forget my parents flying out from JFK that same day on an 845 flight to Ireland, when I heard the news I was terrified

TWA 800 was the biggest cover up in Aviation history, and in this country's history.

@joeluebbers5474

10 ай бұрын

Yes

@hartleyhare99

8 ай бұрын

Along with Pan Am 103

@vitty7465

Ай бұрын

The cover-ups will keep happening and get bigger as long as they have the power of the crooked 3 letter agencies and main stream media to back them up

There's no mystery, surrounding TWA Flight 800. The 755 witnesses, who saw a streak of light leave the ground, travel toward the plane, and explode next to it clearly revealed what happened.

@michaelsoutherland3023

Жыл бұрын

It was a dud, the projectile went through the plane.

@tuckeraweston

11 ай бұрын

Weren’t there two mussels?

@limeyosu2000

10 ай бұрын

That’s a lot of witnesses to call bs on I really think it was a accident on the part of the navy. It was shot down and covered up.

@bob80q

10 ай бұрын

Try again, it was only 30 people. What a moron.

@QueenE31

9 ай бұрын

It’s been a cover up from day dot. A missile hit that air craft. That’s why the missile inventory on the US military craft had a missile unaccounted for.

OMFG! A documentary about an air crash that did not use the term 'black box'!!!!!!!!!!!! First time ever for me, in over twenty years of following air disasters!

The yanks are experts at covering things up 😂😂😂

@hartleyhare99

8 ай бұрын

Pan Am 103

N93119 had flown for 10 hours prior to becoming flight 800, from Athens to New York. The fuselage had been exposed to freezing temperatures down to minus 50 degrees celcius at least. After that flight, she was only on the ground at Kennedy for about four hours. The big deal made at the time was that the plane had been sitting on the hot tarmac (28 degrees Celsius) in New York with the A/C running full blast "for hours", which supposedly heated the nearly empty centre wing tank, and vaporised the residual fuel to flashpoint. How warm or hot was that tank really after the takeoff for Paris? This was never questioned. The tests that were done only showed the best scenario for the outcome of the investigation, in favor of a short circuit. They flew an ex- Pan Am 747-100 of Evergreen Airlines over a warm part of the US at a relatively low altitude to come to the conclusion that the centre wing tank could reach these alarming high temps. Now, I can't help but think that that tank on that plane never got a chance to heat up and become volatile the way they stated. Especially not to blow the plane apart the way it did. Not by a tiny spark. The sea remained ablaze for hours after impact. This tells me that something much more violent than a simple fuel/air explosion took place midflight. I can only hope that one day, the truth will come out. The 747 involved was from 1971 and had logged over 93,000 hours. As history would later have it, these planes could easily last that long. 14 people's remains never recovered? That's a lot of people. Something very very violent decimated those people...

@robshef718

Жыл бұрын

The truth is out. It was a missile, but we don't yet know who's, but not the US navy. nonsense. and then run....nonsense. thats what needs to be done, find out who's missiles. The NTSB was cited for fraud in court, and their scenario was proven false in court. So it continues, but the government is not going to help.

@tiadaid

10 ай бұрын

You’re forgetting that the aircondition packs, located under the tank, heated up way beyond ambient temperature. The packs, when operating, was estimated to be 176 degrees Celsius. So add that to the ambient temperature, and the tanks could easily heat up quickly. As for the sea being ablaze for hours, that’s what you get when the plane broke up releasing tons of fuel from the wings which caught fire…

@dutchy1176

10 ай бұрын

@@tiadaid I did take the airconditioning packs into concideration in my comment. I'm only steering towards the fact that the real possible temperature inside the tank of flight 800 was never calculated during the 30 million dollar investigation. The plane was in the air for 12 minutes before the disaster. Wingvents vented the tank during this time. The tank cooled back down during this time. In my opinion, every test that was done during the investigation, was done in favor of the outcome in the official report. That's not even concidering the radar evidence, hundreds of eyewitness reports, nitrates found on the seatbacks and other debris, random damage to the interior and the passengers sitting close to each other, etc.

@dutchy1176

10 ай бұрын

@@matdenis7837 These missile do not *hit* their target, but explode in proximity to it. Look at MH17. Bodies were strewn all over the fields, and not vaporized. There is a possibility that a proximity fused warhead exploded a distance away from flight 800. This sent a shockwave towards the fuselage and ripped the plane apart. According to researchers, it wouldn't neccessarily leave the telltale schrapnell characteristics behind. This would explain the mach ejecta caught on radar, and the hundreds of eywitness accounts. There is no question whether the CWT exploded. The question is when and how. Radar evidence also shows that the plane dropped like a stone after it was hit, completely disproving the zoom climb video fabricated by the CIA.

@daviddavis3389

4 ай бұрын

No bomb found, nor any evidence of sabotage. .No missile or related source discovered..

It was a surface to air missle that blew up the plane

Things I notice: - the helicopter pilot is more polished and a better speaker even than the reporters. Media training? - odd that the NTSB's message is "this happens a lot, flying is dangerous". They usually say "don't worry, flying is safe" - "money is more important than lives" - like a lightning rod for criticism, make sure it hits something other than what you're protecting - "within a few weeks Boeing will recommend inspections" ... umm what? No immediate grounding? Almost like they're not worried about the fuel tank issue.

They lie with such a bold face

Too bad it wasn’t a test of a Patriot battery prototype. It would have been a miss for sure

This disaster happened when I was in high school, there's even a picture of its wreckage in the Atlantic in my yearbook.

12:30 unbelievable narcissism her Contract always stipulated that her camera had a slightly blurred screen

"Portable Phones" lol

Only God knows the truth as to what happened on that 747.

@markphillips898

10 ай бұрын

No, the government also knows what happened, that's why it went to such lengths to concoct a story complete with CIA animation to convince us

@raywest3834

10 ай бұрын

@Angelomendez75 Here is hard evidence: Exploding fuel tank did NOT initiate the plane's destruction. Here's proof: FAA radar data shows (at the moment the plane lost electrical power) supersonic debris shooting out of the plane at Mach 4. A fuel tank explosion could NOT POSSIBLY explain this, (according to physicist Dr. Tom Stalcup) as a jet fuel explosion is subsonic and cannot produce a force of this magnitude.

They Knew Military was Involved but .....

10:23 WTC towers RIP

Well, they kept that real. The media doesn't report like this anymore.

@daviddavis3389

4 ай бұрын

Were the passengers allowed to have smoking & none smoking back in 1996 or 1997 ?

@daviddavis3389

4 ай бұрын

Cause some dumby may have snuck around and lit a cigarette..

@thunderturbine8860

4 ай бұрын

@@daviddavis3389 Think at that point smoking had been banned. By memory I read that it had been banned in the US in 1988

I remember when this plane went down. It seemed people heard about it, then that was it. That always stuck with me…

Wow it didnt get the chance to explode on the ground with much heat and oxygen rather than near freezing temperature with lower oxygen at 15000ft!

32:21 David McLaine of Eastwind 507 said it never climbed after it explode

Hmmmm, that's a lot of floating fire. Ive seen that before.....

Can’t even watch this crap we all know it was shot down

Never fly in an airplane piloted by someone named Kevorkian.

I’m fascinated by that newsreader’s hairstyle

@jeffandersen7397

Жыл бұрын

you mean Award-winning American Television Journalist and Anchorwoman, Diane Sawyer? She's the cat's pajamas.........or did you mean Sam Donaldson the Human Bob's BigBoy figurine

@robynlea6950

Жыл бұрын

Sam Donaldson's hairstyle looks like a toupe 🧖.

@PJay-wy5fx

10 ай бұрын

It's based on lady Di's hairstyle. It was very popular for many years.

@kristinasymons

10 ай бұрын

@@jeffandersen7397😂😂😂

@AskAlex1999

9 ай бұрын

@@PJay-wy5fx❤

I'm sure Final Destination was inspired by this.

@Zkhan2475

5 ай бұрын

It was

Remember Folks... "There was No Missile..!!"

@martinmayfield1932

9 ай бұрын

Exactly!!

Missile missile missile

@JaggedEdge1975

Жыл бұрын

So they just want us to think that the plane just blew up for no reason or it blew up from sitting in the sun for two hrs ok they funny

@weworks7811

10 ай бұрын

CIA: “The witnesses did NOT see a missile..”

@tjfSIM

10 ай бұрын

@@JaggedEdge1975It’s very straightforward and easy to understand if you actually bother to read the reports. It was sat on the ramp in hot weather with the ac packs running for hours before departure. The packs were directly beneath the centre tank, and these conditions warmed the fuel in the tank so there was an explosive vapour. Faulty wiring running through the tank then created a spark which ignited the vapour and caused the explosion. The same explosive conditions were recreated using similar aircraft, as part of the investigation. Don’t see what’s difficult to understand about that 🙄

@dwg1105

8 ай бұрын

@@tjfSIM I ordered and read the Cal Tech jet fuel tests done after the accident. They could not get the jet fuel to ignite with a spark even after heating it to the expected level. I of a number of people from Long Island family who's friends saw the missile streak on that fine summer beach afternoon.

@Eric_H68

8 ай бұрын

​@@tjfSIMI'll bet you believe everything you are told to believe. Everything!

There Isa Whisleblower I have documentation of the Top Secret exercise known as Global Yankee 96

@Highflight1000

Жыл бұрын

It was an Obstruction of Justice by Clinton’s NTSB FBI CIA Stephanopolous Panetta Kallstrom Carville US Navy Dept of Defense News Media etc

@robshef718

Жыл бұрын

No top secret exercise. if it was Top secret, you would not be saying..."it was top secret." just sayin. but to answer your concern, no, the navy did not do it, and the navy was nowhere near Long Island that nite.

@Highflight1000

Жыл бұрын

@@robshef718 I suggest you do more research prior to commenting subsequent to 27 years and thousands of documentations and736 Eye Witnesses What are your credentials?

@HufflepuffDaddy

11 ай бұрын

@@robshef718 allegedly, they were around 30 USN ships testing missles in W-105 (Warning Area 105) which happens to be located off Long Island.

@robshef718

11 ай бұрын

@@HufflepuffDaddy Again, bad rumors that were never vetted by any 'so called investigators' until I had to be the only adult in the room, and step in, and do some 'actual' research. So my research pulled up archived records. 1: The navy was not operating off of Long Island that night 2: This is on a list of operational ships that I got from archives. 3: The FAA records as well as the FAA transcripts have the W 105 as closed. 4: No, "over flying airliners", nor any private pleasure flyers that night, nor any boaters, nor any cargo ships, nor the coast guard reported any "Flotilla of navy ships", which would be hard to miss.

Was Stockton Rush in charge of the design?

I was very close to being able to save them. I was over half a world away rescuing children from a genocide when I was alerted that there was trouble. I flew over and deployed my helicopter while in mid-air and was able to pull close to the plane but a terrorist snuck aboard and while I still was able to kill him pretty quickly due to my skills, it was too late. It haunts me to this day. I always have made it my mission in life to help you…. Little people such as yourself. But I am only human after all despite my training and everything.

@Luckyluke870

2 ай бұрын

What the F u talking about bra

@nicolelawless9942

23 күн бұрын

I wished i had saved them as an emotional almost 22 year old me. That’s how much I love them

11:41 crazy.

That’s the day my niece was born.

Missile

UAP/UFO HIT THE PLANE 😂 NEVER THOUGHT THAT NOW DID THEY

It was actualy in 1996 not 1997

Sam Donaldson was still doing the news in 96 ???

Yeah another sad remembrance for the country especially New Yorkers in general. The entire Globe was shocked by this devastating and shocking news of TWA flight 800. It was a tragic and sad day for New Yorkers and the entire Nation in general. Very Sad and unfortunate situation. May their gentle souls continue to rest in perfect peace. Amen

TWA 800 left 80 minutes late. The airplane that should have been in that airspace then was Israeli EL AL.......

@dutchy1176

Жыл бұрын

Exactly...

@michaelsoutherland3023

Жыл бұрын

What, USS Liberty type story.

@lsrose

9 ай бұрын

And the plot thickens!

@JamesFaye-lt4dv

3 ай бұрын

​@@michaelsoutherland3023are you saying that the IDF did not attack the Liberty......

@michaelsoutherland3023

3 ай бұрын

@@JamesFaye-lt4dv Opps, not that... but our on gov covering up another incident. Think I had just watched a video about the Liberty and somehow the comment seemed to fit at the time.

31:23 "Does the flight crew say anything?" "we have no idea what went on the cockpit", what about the flight voice recorder, which was found one week after the crash. There must have been some reaction to the explosion on tape. If there wasn't, it means that they were already incapacitated. This story of "time dilation" is bs, pilots are trained to observe and report things. 32:06 "at some point, enough of the structure just in front of the fuel tank was gone, that the airplane could no longer support the nose" is also bull. From what I've seen and heard, the missile theory would make more sense, a missile that slices the front part of the plane completely off, at the moment of impact. If that happens, no crew member in the nose would have been able to react anymore. An accidental hit by a military missile is out of the question, commercial planes have a safety built in, the IFF, which broadcasts a signal. Any hit by a military missile must have been intentional.

@joni3503

Жыл бұрын

@@matdenis7837 'should'

@change_your_oil_regularly4287

10 ай бұрын

You are hilarious 🤣 Fark expert opinion just believe me LOLZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ An absolute majority of independent experts globally agree with the official report.... but stuff them we should just accept your unqualified opinion Thanks for the laughs joni

@Bob31415

9 күн бұрын

@@change_your_oil_regularly4287 Listen to the genius. Over 500 eyewitnesses saw a streak ascending and terminating in proximity of the plane. I suppose *every single one* of them was hallucinating. *Not one* was called to testify before the NTSB. Radar data showed debris flying from the plane at 3,000 mph which doesn't happen from a fuel tank explosion. But keep believing your fairy tale.

If only people would have known that TWA 800 would become one of the biggest cover ups in history. I feel so bad for those poor victims and their families.

@Unknown-Ways

Жыл бұрын

Wym ?? By that what was the real reason

@Zeppelee

Жыл бұрын

@@Unknown-Ways The government stated that it was a modicum of faulty, brittle electrical wiring and the center fuel tank that was responsible for the TWA 800 crash. However, in reality, a ground-to-air proximity missile rose up from being fired from a Navy vessel. The missile then exploded near the left wing, ripping into it and embedding several pieces of the missile. It's why there are no photographs of said left wing, as it is the key evidence; the "smoking gun".

@nilssoderling6259

Жыл бұрын

We know that it was the center fuel tank explosion

@natocountryball9028

Жыл бұрын

@@nilssoderling6259 true

@nilssoderling6259

Жыл бұрын

Bcs a idiot might say "uM tHeY sAw A lIgHt GoInG uP sO It MuSt Be A mIsSiLe" yeah here is thing that was the plane with out the front blown of by the center fuel tank going up. I know that flight 103 had its nose blown of but it did not go up. But flight 103 was at cruising altitude flight 800 was not, it was in climb and bcs it was heavy at the back it did climb

Missiles destroy aircraft with shrapnel. Hundreds of half inch holes over a wide area of fuselage. Look up MH17 for examples of the typical damage.

There was college students from Syracuse University on that flight

@Divine-Thunder.

10 ай бұрын

Wrong! Your confused with Pan Am 103. Lockerbie, Scotland. Dec 21st 1988. 35 Syracuse students murdered by Libya.

@sef4pres

10 ай бұрын

There were* You're*

@hartleyhare99

8 ай бұрын

Murdered by Iran/Palestine/Syria

717 is the date. 727 is the date of the explosion of the Quantas Boeing 747.

Investigation? Did you study other theories?

11:41 twin towers that's crazy I was 16 at time remember..

I'm bored, brother! - Terry Bollea

A tragic cover up for a sailor's mistake. The evidence? When the FBI assumes command over the normal investigation team(NTSB). How many times has this happened? Can only think of one other. 9/11. Case closed rocks

Just fill up all gas tanks before take off on everyflght. This is that answer. That's all that had to do,the bible says THE LOVE OF MONEY IS THE ROOT OF ALL EVIL,

@joeluebbers5474

10 ай бұрын

It was not the tank, that is every plane on a tarmac now.

@allangibson8494

23 күн бұрын

Aircraft fuel tanks are most dangerous when empty…

The Navy shot it down with a missile

@Marc816

2 жыл бұрын

An accident. But the F______ news media covered it up.

@AradSabet

2 жыл бұрын

No

@Hektore894

Жыл бұрын

@@AradSabet it’s actually unknown. We still don’t know if it was shot down or a failure happened. There was another aircraft that saw it and said it came out of nowhere. However there was also a pave hawk who witnessed it and said there was a military projectile.

@jeffandersen7397

Жыл бұрын

SPOILER ALERT

@Halakah7

Жыл бұрын

@@Hektore894 100% incorrect. There is no question that it was shot down. There are numerous rock solid eyewitness' that have documented this in fact. Some were even high ranking whistle blowers who were on board the USN vessels. The evidence is massive, but you have to dig to find it, it HAS been deliberately buried for obvious reasons...

Why does Sam keep saying “craysh “?

No other plane ever did that bc it is a lie

34:28 - while not mentioned here, the reason why the Iranian 747 that crashed was virtually identical to TWA 800 is because it was one of the several 747s that TWA had bought and then sold on to Iran.

TWA someone want to Destroy that Company so TWA Went out this wasnt the First time happen Before someone want toDestoy this Company and Who ever was did a Great Job. MAFIA TIME

Just like Jet value. This Ll Airliners for Compitition like Eastern so Compitation on Airliners

Not a conspiracy. There have plenty of solid evidence to show that the plane would not do what it simply from a fuel tank explosion. Also how The FBI video constantly repeats “it was not a missile”. 😂

@emily-clark

7 ай бұрын

Do you have any proof of what you're claiming ?

@martinmayfield1932

7 ай бұрын

@@emily-clark watch the documentaries and read the books. Plenty of evidence if you want to look.

@aoht06

6 ай бұрын

@@emily-clarkHundreds of eye witnesses report seeing missiles hit the plane. This was documented by police officers but the information was suppressed by the CIA who pressured the witnesses to retract their stories. The fact the CIA was so involved in this and created a propaganda video attempting to debunk the missile theory is all the proof you need it was a cover up.

@pmullins1495

5 ай бұрын

It was a US Navy missile !! Fired from NY Harbor (?). All else is Stalin’s Big Lie !! 😂

@pmullins1495

5 ай бұрын

It was a US Navy missile !! Fired from NY Harbor (?). All else is Stalin’s Big Lie !! 😂

it was shutdown

Ty navy for shooting it down

@andrewasp6043

2 жыл бұрын

@l it was probably an accidental shooting down , but either way it was a cover up! Do a little research, The whole investigation stunk to high heaven

@jimbrown9817

2 жыл бұрын

@l that’s a good one. 🤣

@AradSabet

2 жыл бұрын

There is no navy

@jimbrown9817

2 жыл бұрын

@l Were you out in Whiskey 102? I’d love to hear the real story.

@jeffandersen7397

Жыл бұрын

I dunno, i kinda like the Exploding Air-Conditioning theory. It's like the Magic Bullet theory, just way more stupid.

The trigger happy Navy shot it down and don't let anyone tell you a different story.

@daviddavis3389

4 ай бұрын

Who told you that information? Are you priviy to inside knowledge?

@darwinstubbie860

4 ай бұрын

@@daviddavis3389 You got it.

This was a cover up from day dot.

Oh thank goodness, I found some truth if only in the comments.

Directed energy weapon?

There's no mystery here. The NTSB report explains what happened.

@Halakah7

Жыл бұрын

Good grief Charlie Brown! WHY so gullible? NEVER go full Kool-Aid.

@michaelsoutherland3023

Жыл бұрын

It only speculates. Read about the USS Liberty or how the VP of the Oath Keepers J6 insurrection group was an FBI informant (that's not a theory).

@markphillips898

10 ай бұрын

do you believe in Santa Claus, too?

@joeluebbers5474

10 ай бұрын

Geeeesh, I hope you don’t fly if it’s that easy to blow it up.

25:20

Imagine condescendingly using the JFK assassination to suggest a conspiracy is absurd

As airline specialist i wil never accept twa800 went down due to mechanical failure , never ever believe that 👍 😊

@joeluebbers5474

10 ай бұрын

Exactly, if it blew up in that manner then all planes need grounded.

Spok lol

24:10

Funny enough that they bring up a second gunman in dallas as a conspiracy

This guy can’t pronounce the word crash

they spend a lot of time on the "exploding fuel vapor" scenario, yet the plane was only in the air for 11 minutes On It's Way to PARIS! pretty sure both tanks would have been full of actual fuel, Not Vapor! Oh America, how many skeletons can one country cram into a closet before it collapes from the weight of its own guilt

@kenbongaards554

Жыл бұрын

v Valid point. On a transaltantic flight like that that 47 woudl've been laden with fuel!!

@dutchy1176

Жыл бұрын

No, only the wing tanks were filled. The huge centre wing tank was not, because from New York to Paris, it was a relatively short flight for a 747. The wing tanks carried enough fuel for the flight. But still, I do think that the plane was shot down.

@robshef718

Жыл бұрын

@@kenbongaards554 only the wing tanks were filled, for the trek east. The center tank was very low.

@bob80q

10 ай бұрын

yep, more idiots who don't even know the facts running off at the fingers. Conspiracy nuts of America unite.

Premonition l l

U.S. Navy, USS Leyte Bay, fired the missile that brought down TWA-800.

@robshef718

Жыл бұрын

USS who? No such ship! or are you talking about another navy? Our Navy was not operational off Long Island that night. but certainly would not fire missiles INTO a busy airway. but no our navy was not out there. thats one of them thar rumors.

@HufflepuffDaddy

11 ай бұрын

USS Leyte Gulf, not Leyte Bay

✈️🛬💥💀🤷

Investigation cover up of all time😞😞😞

That missile theory was thoroughly refuted a year later and Salinger was completely humiliated. Glad no one believes that old theory anymore.

@raywest3834

10 ай бұрын

@QuinnnMallory Let me bring you up to speed: Exploding fuel tank did NOT initiate the plane's destruction. Here's proof: FAA radar data shows (at the moment the plane lost electrical power) supersonic debris shooting out of the plane at Mach 4. A fuel tank explosion could NOT POSSIBLY explain this, (according to physicist Dr. Tom Stalcup) as a jet fuel explosion is subsonic and cannot produce a force of this magnitude. This is the smoking gun, disproving the NTSB conclusion. (Dr. Stalcup obtained the radar data through a F.O.I.A. request)

@QuinnnMallory

10 ай бұрын

Hey KZread! Someone apparently replied, but it was suppressed because it was fact checked and found to be false!? Let ME decide if a reply is false or not! Stop suppressing replies! 😡

@joeluebbers5474

10 ай бұрын

@@QuinnnMallory the reply was if you believe the fuel tank excuse then rethink it.

This just another example of a politically convenient accident investigation

this airplane was taken down by a US sub never will admit but theres lots of info out there

@docbrummer2532

10 ай бұрын

Subs don’t have surface to air missiles

@tomtom1541

10 ай бұрын

​@@docbrummer2532actually they do nowadays.

Cover up

My personal belief as sad & heartbreaking as it is, is that it was the NAVY. My 2nd opinion belief is the heat on the tarmac, & not enough rest for the plane. 4 hours, compared to maybe 9 10 hours of flight? & Also way to much over flying of planes, & definitely age, & money has a big thing to do /w it also. 🙏✝️💜🕊️

No bomb brought this plane down. No missle from the navy. The NTSB did a outstanding job to find out what really happened to the plane. People are gonna believe what they want to even with the truth right in front of them. May all the families find some sort of peace and comfort.

The J6 insurrection is still the darkest day in history.

@markphillips898

10 ай бұрын

not even close, it was a protest in petition of the government for redress of grievances

@afridgetoofar1818

10 ай бұрын

McDonald’s cancelling the McRib is 10x darker than J6.

@michaelsoutherland3023

10 ай бұрын

@@markphillips898 My cat still can't sleep at night since J6. Side note, Greg McWhirter was VP of insurrection group "Oath Keepers" and worked with FBI for months leading up to J6.

@michaelsoutherland3023

10 ай бұрын

@@afridgetoofar1818 Totally forgot about the McRib, now I'm sad it's gone. Side note, Greg McWhirter was VP of insurrection group "Oath Keepers" and worked with FBI for months leading up to J6.

OMG the Black hawk pilot can't believe not one person was saved. He should try jumping out of a plane without a parachute at 15,000 feet to see if he would survive. TWA never lost a 747, or 767, or 757. They did loose 2 L1011s one overnight stay in Boston the coffee pot was left on and caught on fire and the flight 843 but all 293 passengers lived. Please tell me why the FBI said the witnesses saw or mistaken a missile and it was the plane climbing. The Eastwood pilot said it just went down. There was no fucking climbing because when the nose separated, it caused the tail to go down there for no wind flowing over the wings creating no lift. THERE WAS NO CLIMB. The Air Force still Flys B52s and they are almost 100 years old. And don't you think the explosion frayed the wires. Google what the temperature is the air at 15,000 feet and it will say 32 degrees F. The plane would have exploded on the ground if it was the air conditioner that caused the crash. FBI keeps studdering and changing their story and boldface lied to the American people. You really can't compare a 747 with a 737 but you can compare Pan Am, Korean Airlines, and Japan Airlines has lost 3 or more 747s from pilot error or maintenance. TWA never lost a 747 from pilot error or maintenance because it was a missile. There was radar evidence there was eye witnesses. Oh well at least kalstroms in He'll and soon the others will follow. Look up TWA800.com and you will see the truth.