That is Sick!!!!! The one liter test was awesome! Its thirsty!!! LOL Thanks for sharing!!!

@thelightersideofrc

7 ай бұрын

Thanks for watching! Yea she burns through a TON of fuel at full throttle!

Great vid Jon. Can’t wait to see it in a model.

@thelightersideofrc

7 ай бұрын

Thanks John.

Very very nice! I have a Kingtech 450 new in box. I'll have to see about doing an unboxing too.

@thelightersideofrc

7 ай бұрын

Cool!

Hey man Overall good vibes and genuine personality on your channel and I love it, along with the planes of course LOL. Cheers man and keep doing what your doing! -Ché

@thelightersideofrc

7 ай бұрын

Thanks so much!

well done .. thanks for video

@thelightersideofrc

6 ай бұрын

Thanks for watching!

“Monster” of a turbine …. Glad we got one for the F16 1:5.. thanks Jonathan 🙏🏻

@thelightersideofrc

7 ай бұрын

Oh Yea! The monster is just that!!!! Crazy push!

@kellyrohrbachsbvmhanger9912

6 ай бұрын

I think it should be called Godzilla 🤣

@thelightersideofrc

6 ай бұрын

@kellyrohrbachsbvmhanger9912 haha! I like it!

Wow, can I have two please. Impressive stuff

@thelightersideofrc

7 ай бұрын

Crazy hey!

Great test. What I always miss in these tests is the airspeed. It always is zero, while during flying there is high airspeed. Makes a big difference.

@thelightersideofrc

5 ай бұрын

Very true but don't have the means to do test runs in an air speed tunnel ufortunately.

@GiesbertNijhuis

5 ай бұрын

@@thelightersideofrc A real windtunnel can be a bit much yea. But I'm sure you can blast it with a prop or EDF. You'd be the first to do it! (? as far as I know)

@DakarNick

Ай бұрын

How much of a difference? I watched a video of a turbine engine tech doing testing on full-scale and he said the power difference is negligible between a static test and one at speed.

@GiesbertNijhuis

Ай бұрын

@@DakarNick Really? (link?) Let me rephrase: if there is a big difference in airspeed, in how quickly the air gets in, I would expect a large difference in thrust. But reality is the boss. I have not tested that. Interesting that someone did a real test and not measured a significant difference.

😲 WOW

@thelightersideofrc

5 ай бұрын

😎

Nice review

@thelightersideofrc

7 ай бұрын

Thank you! Cheers!

I don't remember if you've done this or not but, it would be an interesting comparison in power/run-time numbers between diesel, kerosene and actual jet fuel (for those turbines that can use it anyway). Did I hear that max operating speed correctly, 300meters/sec? That's pushing supersonic there for a model engine. Looking forward to the bird you put that beast in!

@thelightersideofrc

7 ай бұрын

Haven't done a comparison like that yet. Yea crazy the speed and altitude this can opperate at .

@eljaibas16

7 ай бұрын

Warped Perception did a comparison between diesel, hydro diesel, and kerosene I believe. As well as thrust tests and consumption test, highly recommend watching their videos.

@thelightersideofrc

7 ай бұрын

@@eljaibas16 yea I watched it. Not accurate. All the thrust ratings will be identical but fuel consumption between various fuels will differ slightly

The beast for a beast😊

@thelightersideofrc

7 ай бұрын

Oh Yea!

Probably bit over kill for the Habu then.....😮. What a BEAST 😊. What ever machine it goes in Full Throttle won,t used as much with thrust like that. That F-16 being pretty clean anyhoo will scoot along. Be well keep at it. 😊

@thelightersideofrc

7 ай бұрын

HAHA. Weighs more than the Habu I would guess. A true rocket with wings!

@e8guy316

7 ай бұрын

@@thelightersideofrcat that point it would just be a turbine with wings 😂😂😂

Jonathan. Very impressive Motor and powerful. Jonathan does these Engines run different when in Aircraft? Would a small leaf blower added to the Front change the Performance of your Test? Act like in Jet getting Air Force into Engine?

@thelightersideofrc

7 ай бұрын

Yes for sure run's different in the aircraft. More restrictions possibly in the fuel system, different airflow patterns.

1:10 this type of connector is a "locking" 3 pin XLR (male/female, you can get 5 pin etc, handy for signal/power)

@thelightersideofrc

6 ай бұрын

🙌

Tyler Perry is the only one who can afford jet turbines this size

@thelightersideofrc

7 ай бұрын

HAHA. Any many others!

@happygilmore2100

5 ай бұрын

He has converted most of his jet engined models to EDF.

@superskullmaster

5 ай бұрын

But he doesn’t use turbines, hasn’t for a while.

I'm going to use two of these and make a homebuilt 40% 2-seat HondaJet. 18 gal/hr x 2 = 36 gal/hr or 250 lb/hr.

@thelightersideofrc

7 ай бұрын

Sounds Fun!

12A during startup.. lol Big numbers there as well!

@thelightersideofrc

7 ай бұрын

Yea dual ignitors suck the power.

Wow, impressive test, impressive engine. Can you explain how you calculate the maximum flight time for a jet? Or do you always calculate with maximum consumption because of safety reasons? There's no telemetry for the tank capacity, is there?

@thelightersideofrc

7 ай бұрын

Thanks. If you are installing a suitable size engine for the aircraft, generally the first step is to set a timer of 5-6 min on your radio. Fly that time on the maiden and slowly adjust. So if your gear up starts the timer and you land when 6 min is up and you still have 1/4 a tank left. Bump it up to 7 min. Fly that for a few flights and see. Generally after the maiden you will fly more aggressive and use more fuel so adjust as needed. If you 10 flights in and your still landing with 1/3rd tank than but it up 30 seconds. Xicoy telemetry unit will give fuel consumption. Pretty much all other turbines can use the Vspeak unit which will give tank capacity and fuel consumption.

I'd be interested to see fuel consumption rates for say 33% and 66% done in the same way as I imagine most of these engines are not operating at full power all the time (altho these may be used in single flight target drones so they could be).

@thelightersideofrc

7 ай бұрын

Exactly! Once they are at cruising speed and you back down on the throttle the fuel consumption goes way down.

two of those on a cri-cri would be fun

@thelightersideofrc

6 ай бұрын

HAHA. Agreed! Two on anything would be fun!

wow, that reminds me of how I used fuel when I had my 57 chevy souped up and running

@thelightersideofrc

6 ай бұрын

HAHA. No kidding hey! Not fuel efficient at all.

The DEMON returns!

@thelightersideofrc

7 ай бұрын

BOOM!

So, an RC aircraft with this engine could make a fairly high speed and with enough fuel could cover a long distance. The question I have is how do you control the flight path?

@thelightersideofrc

5 ай бұрын

Keep it in view always or use UAV Software.

How much does it cost for the engine? How much fuel does it use? How much noise does it produce? What is the weight of the engine? How much thrust at normal running speed? Is it possible to reduce the high pitched scream these engines make?

@number40Fan

5 ай бұрын

Answers to a couple of your questions were answered in the video.

Unlike Full Scale Turbines where the support bearings are oiled using a Labyrinth seal design, R/C Turbines use an Open design that rely on the Oil mixed w/ the Kerosene to supply the needed Lubricants. You run out of fuel and you run out of Bearing Lube. At 10,000 RPM a bearing can overheat quickly without lubricant. I wouldn't recommend what you've done here on Any R/C Turbine, especially a New one.

@thelightersideofrc

5 ай бұрын

What I have done here is exactly how they are designed to operate! Thank you for watching!

For the record, the JETCAT P1000 puts out more than double the thrust of this little toy.

@thelightersideofrc

5 ай бұрын

You bet! And the Swiwin 800 puts out less than the Jetcat 1000.

@pavlosconstantinou9236

4 ай бұрын

for the record.. the JEtcat is a pro model.. .

@DakarNick

Ай бұрын

Wow, really?

I wonder how fast an RC SR-71 would go with two of these and real afterburners in it.

@thelightersideofrc

2 ай бұрын

😮😮😮😮💨

"" if "" there ever was a A-6 Intruder big enough that would be a monster of a Intruder, it would look great in the air.

@thelightersideofrc

7 ай бұрын

Oh Yea!

you have any details on your test stand?

@thelightersideofrc

6 ай бұрын

Built by RCCUSTOM3DPRINTING.com

I know that you've build the F-14 XXL before. Do you believe that the Swiwin 400 can safely fit in the fuselage?

@thelightersideofrc

Ай бұрын

The 400 is not needed. Twin 300's would be way over powered but fun!

@hubblehosting8862

Ай бұрын

@@thelightersideofrc | Copy that. Thanks for the info!

So when is someone going to build a marine version? To replace the loss of the SMP5 from jetcat

@thelightersideofrc

6 ай бұрын

Good Question!

Is your 'Fuel' mixed with Lubricant?

@thelightersideofrc

7 ай бұрын

Yes. Most turbines use a %5 oil mixed into fuel.

No matter how many times i watch these test videos, it still blows my mind how fast these engines burn through 1L of fuel. 🤯

@thelightersideofrc

7 ай бұрын

I know! Crazy Hey!

Man i wish you would give the stats in imperial units. I have no idea about max speed or fuel consumption. I don’t get micro liters or any of that. Pounds, miles or knots please.

@thelightersideofrc

5 ай бұрын

😂😂 Can all be easily converted with "GOOGLE!"

Was there a decimal point hidden by that wire? If yes, how did you manage to keep it hidden through the whole test?

@thelightersideofrc

5 ай бұрын

Yes there is a decimal point. It was a stationary camera.

@charlesspringer4709

5 ай бұрын

@@thelightersideofrcAnd a very determined wire 😁

@thelightersideofrc

5 ай бұрын

@charlesspringer4709 🤣🤣

Turboprops? Generator? Nat gas? Microgenerators is my thought maybe small property owners could setone up and produce theyre own power and sell into the grid to offset costs over time just a thought .

@thelightersideofrc

5 ай бұрын

and thats how innovation and invention happens!

@joesutherland225

5 ай бұрын

@@thelightersideofrc if I had the cash I'd try it .electrician so that side is covered but I know squat about the prime mover side of the unit

@joesutherland225

5 ай бұрын

@@thelightersideofrc it would have to be natural gas due to availability to most homeowners basically the same as big powerplants do now but on a micro scale

Think the KT450 is the biggest available to purchase for general public.

@jonkje

7 ай бұрын

Swiwin has an 800 though...

@davewilshere

7 ай бұрын

JetCat have a 400, 500 and 550….

@thelightersideofrc

7 ай бұрын

Lots of options.

Total thrust ??? Of 400 Jet engine

@thelightersideofrc

6 ай бұрын

One we ran the other day got 90.25 lbs output

Could probably run a small one person jet with two of these…

@thelightersideofrc

Ай бұрын

Yes for sure! They also make a SWIWIN 800 turbine!

@marksmadhousemetaphysicalm2938

Ай бұрын

I can see an affordable jet for two people built using 4 of these on the wings, 100 liter tank should allow at least 1,000 km and simple pressurization system…the four engines could power IFR and the most basic weather radar…less than 200k … way cheaper than the 2 mil. for an Eclipse 500 or Cirrius Vision Jet

did it get to to 88lbs of thrust?

@thelightersideofrc

7 ай бұрын

No It won't unless your at sea level at 15 deg c.

Gulp😮!😮😢❤

@thelightersideofrc

7 ай бұрын

😂

If you're curious, 300 meters p/s = 671 mph

@thelightersideofrc

4 ай бұрын

Phew! FAST!

Just wondering how much that beast cost? I'm guessing 6 to 7 thousand.

@thelightersideofrc

6 ай бұрын

The Monster is currently listed on my site for $6566.00

if it loses 14% at your level how much does it lose at 25,000 ft?

@thelightersideofrc

7 ай бұрын

LOTS! Just like the full size.

HELO HOW CAN I ORDER ONE OR TWO ENGINES LIKE THAT ONE??

@thelightersideofrc

2 ай бұрын

Send me an email or order off my website. Thelightersideofrc.com

Was just short of pushing 1000lbs that’s a lot of power

@thelightersideofrc

5 ай бұрын

👹👹

engine was not shutdown at empty fuel tank very short time, its so unusual ??

@thelightersideofrc

15 күн бұрын

Sorry don't understand your question.

300 m/sec, 671 mph!🤔😳

@thelightersideofrc

6 ай бұрын

CRAZY HEY!

a pw6 engine would not use much more ie 12 gallons per hr .t would take a hell of a plane to hold that much fuel and use this engine for 1hr

@thelightersideofrc

7 ай бұрын

Oh yea! No kidding! Once your at cruise speed, altitude the throttle stick can be backed off.

I'll be the first to admit I'm full 'tarded with money, but even I can't pull the trigger on one of these, so damn cool, but ridiculously expensive.

@thelightersideofrc

4 ай бұрын

Very addicting!

@adamfrbs9259

4 ай бұрын

@@thelightersideofrc 4 of them on an ultralight would be awesome lol.

How do I buy 3

@thelightersideofrc

4 ай бұрын

Send me an email. thelightersideofrc@gmail.com

"Maximum speed of 300m/s....which is fast" Yeah, 43 short of Supersonic lol

@thelightersideofrc

4 ай бұрын

😉😊

jet engine SW400pro price bangladesh

@thelightersideofrc

2 күн бұрын

Check out my website

Max Speed = 330m/s = 670 MPH.... Wow...

@thelightersideofrc

7 ай бұрын

Crazy hey! And operation at 30k ft!

This engine how can fit it in the motorcycle

@thelightersideofrc

2 ай бұрын

Haha. Could!

Please please and please Sir what is the price of this jet engine

@thelightersideofrc

6 ай бұрын

Look at my site.

@user-go2yi1hb3x

6 ай бұрын

Sir, the engine that is in the video

Its 88lb thrust but why showing upto 500lb

@thelightersideofrc

3 ай бұрын

Decimal place.

@themagicartroll8961

3 ай бұрын

@@thelightersideofrc oh ok😂. And I wanna buy this for a university final project could you reduce the cost

@themagicartroll8961

3 ай бұрын

@@thelightersideofrc I can show a Collab. That the jet engine came from you and kind of a sponsored Collab it will increase your viewership and popularity on both sides

You can get much better efficiency out of hydrogen electric .

@thelightersideofrc

5 ай бұрын

Yes, These mini turbines are not efficient at all.

jet engine SW400pro price Uss $.... ples

@thelightersideofrc

2 күн бұрын

Listed on my website!

"The Most Powerful Model Turbine?" While 400N is a fairly large turbine as RC turbines go, it is less than half of the most powerful COTS turbine for RC currently.

@thelightersideofrc

7 ай бұрын

I guess it's not!

Wtf almost 8000 dollars how do you have that kind of money

@thelightersideofrc

4 ай бұрын

What about the 20k jet it’s going in!?

@TalenHavens-ky5sc

4 ай бұрын

That's more then a car dang

No expert here but it sure seems a lot can go wrong during the testing. Your standing inches away from an intensely precise machine run by jet fuel. I would be behind an inch of clear something.

@thelightersideofrc

5 ай бұрын

Same type of thing when it's in our aircraft flying. We do have a save zone which is a 1/2 circle from beside to behind the turbine for 30 ft in all directions.

Shouldn't a good review also include the cost of the product you are reviewing?

@thelightersideofrc

5 ай бұрын

Not if the price is constantly changing. Then you can say well just say "At the time of making this video the price is...." Well if the retail price goes up then that causes issues as well. If you want to see the current price, click the link to the engine in the video description.

Not most powerful, SWIWIN have jet engine for 80 kg of thrust.

@thelightersideofrc

4 ай бұрын

Correct!

@user-ly2xs2gb5n

Ай бұрын

Sw800pro review

my engine makes 3 times that..... and cost a lot less to build

@thelightersideofrc

6 ай бұрын

Sweet! Never heard of your engines? I'm guessing you don't make them for RC Aviation?

@Turbojetkart

6 ай бұрын

@thelightersideofrc It could be used in an RC craft..... but 300lbs of thrust dry..... with out the afterburner.... who knows..... it would be some RC project...... not heard of yours before , but we learn something new every day....

@vazione5410

4 ай бұрын

But isn’t yours much heavier andy?

@Turbojetkart

4 ай бұрын

@@vazione5410 could be made lighter, its first one...... am working with a compant to use them in small aircraft, as it will run for thousand of hours with out issue

I have seen 85 lb for a very short time but never 40 kg of thrust. Not very impressive

@thelightersideofrc

4 ай бұрын

😱

Hardly the most powerful, advertise d as a 400N should see 88lbs not 75lbs/340N

@thelightersideofrc

7 ай бұрын

Absolutely incorrect! Reason being. We are at 3300ft above sea level. At sea level at 15c you will get rated power. At 3300 ft significant reduction

@philjac94

7 ай бұрын

@@thelightersideofrc Even if you said 3% per 1000 feet, the engine falls short of the stated power.

We’re in America, drop the Celsius BS.

@thelightersideofrc

5 ай бұрын

I'm in Canada! I use Celcius!

@opieshomeshop

5 ай бұрын

@@thelightersideofrc Its LAAAAAAME!

@thelightersideofrc

5 ай бұрын

@@opieshomeshop totally 👍

@mauricegold9377

5 ай бұрын

You might be in America. America is not the world. You are statistically less than 4% of world population by number, but 500% or more by perceived entitlement.

AARRRRRGGGG!!!!! ITS NOT AN ENGINE!!!!! ITS A TURBINE

@alonsoparra4359

7 ай бұрын

A turbine is a type of engine

@demondoggy1825

7 ай бұрын

It's not an engine, it's a 347 Chevy smallblock

@edwinthomas618

7 ай бұрын

Its not a radio...its a transmitter😅

@thelightersideofrc

7 ай бұрын

😂😂. Reminds me of it's not a build, it's an assembly......it's not an assembly it's a build....

Please! Please! Please! For the love of god, please stop saying that turbine engines loose 10/15 % power at 3000 ft. That is the most ignorant thing I have heard on KZread in a long time. No turbine engines do not loose 10-15% power at 3000 ft. If that were even close to being true no airline would or even could use a turbine engine. High temperatures play a much greater impact on power output than altitude below 10,000 ft. Please do some homework on this subject before repetitively saying completely erroneous things in every single one of your videos. In reality the power change from sea level to 3000 ft it’s doubtful that you could detect it even with very expensive highly accurate instruments. So, please stop!

@thelightersideofrc

6 ай бұрын

Bahaha! Ok. I’ll just ignore physics and density altitude! Thanks for watching!

@terke1230

6 ай бұрын

@@thelightersideofrcIF, at sea level, you have RPM and EGT headroom at rated thrust, you have a de-rated engine. In that case @malloyneil40 is correct. You could use some of that headroom to get back up to rated thrust at the lower density altitude of your shop. If you not not have those de-rates, then a turbine is simply a naturally aspirated engine and thus looses thrust with loss of density altitude. @malloyneil40 probably needs to study his material a little more to understand what he is saying. Keep up the great work.

@thelightersideofrc

6 ай бұрын

@@terke1230 Thanks!