The Matter Of Antimatter: Answering The Cosmic Riddle Of Existence

Ғылым және технология

You exist. You shouldn’t. Stars and galaxies and planets exist. They shouldn’t. The nascent universe contained equal parts matter and antimatter that should have instantly obliterated each other, turning the Big Bang into the Big Fizzle. And yet, here we are: flesh, blood, stars, moons, sky. Why? Come join us as we dive deep down the rabbit hole of solving the mystery of the missing antimatter.
MODERATOR: Brian Greene
PARTICIPANTS: Marcela Carena, Janet Conrad, Michael Doser, Hitoshi Murayama, Neil Turok
OPENING FILM: Animation by Eoin Duffy of Studio Belly, written by Justin Weinstein and Brian Greene
MORE ABOUT THE PROGRAM AND PARTICIPANTS: www.worldsciencefestival.com/...
This program is part of the Big Ideas Series which is supported in part by the John Templeton Foundation.
SUBSCRIBE to our KZread Channel for all the latest from WSF
VISIT our Website: www.worldsciencefestival.com/
LIKE us on Facebook: / worldsciencefestival
FOLLOW us on Twitter: / worldscifest
TOPICS:
- The Discovery of Antimatter opening film 00:00
- Brian Greene Introduction 04:00
- Participant Introductions 04:54
- What led Paul Dirac to his thinking? 07:25
- Can we create Antimatter? 22:25
- How does the universe create matter and antimatter and yet there is still matter left around us? 29:42
- Using Neutrinos to detect Antimatter 44:55
- The difference in Neutrinos compared to Antimatter 56:30
- Searching for hints of how to prove the Grand Unified theory 01:10:10
- Drowning in theories 01:22:00
- The applications for Antimatter 01:33:01
Filmed live at the 2018 World Science festival.

Пікірлер: 3 300

  • @vikranttyagiRN
    @vikranttyagiRN5 жыл бұрын

    These talks are exactly what Internet has served humanity with. Thank you for making them available

  • @oipbhakeld

    @oipbhakeld

    2 жыл бұрын

    V8

  • @0-m-1-n-0-u-5

    @0-m-1-n-0-u-5

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@oipbhakeld Twin-turbo inline-six.

  • @cherrydragon3120

    @cherrydragon3120

    2 жыл бұрын

    And to keep balance for every highly educational video out on the internet. There are 10 stupid video's and another 30 comedic ones

  • @davidsteece4283

    @davidsteece4283

    2 жыл бұрын

    yeah this and conspiracy videos that are tearing the world apart

  • @renupathak4442
    @renupathak4442 Жыл бұрын

    Brian Green once again at his best. One hearing is not enough so I play and replay and replay to get a clear picture. Feel so blessed to world science

  • @justinbaker2883
    @justinbaker28833 жыл бұрын

    This has got to be the best one so far. Could follow along with 90% of the discussion thanks to all the analogies and slides. Got a little lost during the neutrino talk, they set up how hard it is to catch and detect and it being electrically neutral but then at the end they said they just gonna shoot it 1000kms and split it with a magnet... Im guessing their is some explanation that was too hard to communicate in a discussion like this

  • @benjaminbeard3736

    @benjaminbeard3736

    Жыл бұрын

    All the particles that are not electrically neutral are removed from the beam leaving only the neutrinos. Or reverse the magnet so you get anti matter and when it decays neutrinos are in your decay product.

  • @paulmichaelfreedman8334

    @paulmichaelfreedman8334

    Жыл бұрын

    @@benjaminbeard3736 All the charged particles are stopped by the rocks the beam travels through. Where even gamma radiation only travels at most a few hundred meters, neutrinos shoot through the entire Earth as if it's empty space. Neutrinos need a lightyear of lead to stop half of them. They are able to leave the core of the sun in a straight line without ever bumping into a single nucleus.

  • @benjaminbeard3736

    @benjaminbeard3736

    Жыл бұрын

    @@paulmichaelfreedman8334 thanks for the clarification. I re-read my question and I'm amazed you understood what I was asking about. I wasn't very clear.

  • @djimiwreybigsby5263

    @djimiwreybigsby5263

    4 ай бұрын

    ​@@benjaminbeard3736thanks

  • @souparnadhar7034
    @souparnadhar70342 жыл бұрын

    Neil Turok has very simple approach towards physics, that even reflects in his lectures. I watched many lectures of him on youtube and never saw anyone like him to explain things so simply and easily.

  • @21972012145525

    @21972012145525

    6 ай бұрын

    Agree. He was captivating

  • @garywill6340
    @garywill63403 жыл бұрын

    Brian Greene is a damn good host! He knows exactly how to guide the discussion and just when to interject for the audience. He's like human Alexa!

  • @edwood6015

    @edwood6015

    3 жыл бұрын

    I personally wanted to hear how large amounts of antimatter could be contained but he interjected and prevented that from being in the video. Me not like that.

  • @danieltakacs8222

    @danieltakacs8222

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@edwood6015 it's good for the majority though. That requires individuals to let go of certain stuff, but overall, everyone is happy.

  • @davidkemp3154

    @davidkemp3154

    Жыл бұрын

    I used to read Elegant Universe in between taking tickets at Carousel Cinemas as comgr b4 9/11 when KSM Al Qaeda cell would come thru on weekends for black movies.

  • @hmmmmm6034

    @hmmmmm6034

    Жыл бұрын

    @@edwood6015 I thought the exact same thing, kinda odd that he cut them off. I get that he needs to keep the discussion on topic, but 30 seconds more wouldn't have killed him, and it was fascinating listening to them go back and forth.

  • @rdhighlander

    @rdhighlander

    11 ай бұрын

    van@@danieltakacs8222 I denk deze denk Jeffrey je Jeffrey en dansmet met is dde van een oog doel de dje mobiele nummer is dat

  • @dominiquov4220
    @dominiquov42205 жыл бұрын

    I think Brian Greene as a host/moderator is amazing as he makes sure the conversation flows in terms of the what the audience can digest. Thank you Brian.

  • @horfle

    @horfle

    5 жыл бұрын

    I agree

  • @tdsrk

    @tdsrk

    5 жыл бұрын

    Agreed love listening to the man talk same also goes for neil tyson

  • @johngiorgetti795

    @johngiorgetti795

    4 жыл бұрын

    I think Brian Greene is an annoying moderator...has a whiney voice that distracts from the content

  • @ssgssbeet4133

    @ssgssbeet4133

    4 жыл бұрын

    @fiendin281 lol you think that wasnt on purpose?. Obviously he noticed they were giving too much info that they dont want certain ppl to know for certain reasons ;)

  • @aquadark2291

    @aquadark2291

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@ssgssbeet4133 Might mean capturing them is actually more simple than they thought. Or way to complex for time in the talk. Either is possible.

  • @andykeen3071
    @andykeen30713 жыл бұрын

    I watched this tonight, mind-blowing and brilliant. Also, now I understand how I always have loads of odd socks. This missing ones are travelling back in time. I should have looked for them before I lost them :)

  • @GeorgetownDCNative

    @GeorgetownDCNative

    3 жыл бұрын

    LOL!

  • @ndalahwakulwa3145

    @ndalahwakulwa3145

    3 жыл бұрын

    .

  • @paulmichaelfreedman8334

    @paulmichaelfreedman8334

    Жыл бұрын

    you'll be mindblown once you see pairs of socks spontaneously appearing. Probably the wrong size too.

  • @simonaclutter3138
    @simonaclutter31383 жыл бұрын

    These videos are epic. Finally some content I can binge watch.

  • @cayosalgado1226

    @cayosalgado1226

    3 жыл бұрын

    Would I be someone if it was up to me on what to do with Saturn?

  • @severe1878

    @severe1878

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@cayosalgado1226 i agree i think

  • @nadinedaniels4820

    @nadinedaniels4820

    Жыл бұрын

    Amen

  • @guigomusa
    @guigomusa3 жыл бұрын

    What a privilege to be able to watch - even two years late - some of the most brilliant scientists in their fields in lively conversation on such an interesting topic. And with Brian Greene as the moderator who always puts things in perspective for laypeople. Thank you all.

  • @davidsmith4359

    @davidsmith4359

    3 жыл бұрын

    The ri lectures

  • @charlies2136

    @charlies2136

    3 жыл бұрын

    S v deer get re

  • @alexclarke3534

    @alexclarke3534

    3 жыл бұрын

    C M it’s use in medical imaging was given as just one example in the video if that was a legitimate question, and not just typical religious ignorance

  • @cherrydragon3120

    @cherrydragon3120

    2 жыл бұрын

    @C M they help in way more ways then your invisible man in the sky intended them to be for mankind.

  • @jamesangle7427

    @jamesangle7427

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@cherrydragon3120 don't encourage him by giving him attention. Remember if they act like a spoiled child you should treat them as such and ignore them

  • @veganarchistcommunist3051
    @veganarchistcommunist30513 жыл бұрын

    These guys make they're professions and studies seem so easy and speak almost like they're just having an every day conversation (I realize it is for them).

  • @aaronjames5276

    @aaronjames5276

    2 жыл бұрын

    Totally. And imagine just how well you would have to understand something to be able to make it comprehensible to the "rest of us." That's a REALLY impressive skill, if you think about it. Wow.

  • @smallstudiodesign
    @smallstudiodesign3 жыл бұрын

    Pandemic lockdown... I think I’m learning more about science through these world class speakers than my entire university student days! ✨🏆✨💕😛

  • @remotenetwork5034

    @remotenetwork5034

    3 жыл бұрын

    when you realize your University is a scam to put you in, indentured servitude

  • @smallstudiodesign

    @smallstudiodesign

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@remotenetwork5034 no. I loved all but one of my professors - my university certainly isn’t a scam. My education in applied sciences & architecture is NOT a scam - it’s practical and applicable. So ... not buying your bizarre extremism - you may have had your own experiences, but part of me thinks you’re spewing none sense to justify your lack of education. thank you very much

  • @deusx.machinaanime3072

    @deusx.machinaanime3072

    3 жыл бұрын

    Does it matter or does anti-matter matter? The whole year of school has been suspended.

  • @Bassotronics

    @Bassotronics

    3 жыл бұрын

    One thing I hated about being in university is that when I asked a question to the science teacher, she only tells me four words and that’s it. Then leaves me still scratching my head.

  • @Bassotronics

    @Bassotronics

    3 жыл бұрын

    @ *Deus X. Machina Animé* The oxymoron is that anti-matter should not be made of matter but of something that does not “exist” in the form of matter as we know it and can be affected by gravity... oh yea.. dark matter. Thats the true anti-matter. The “anti-matter” that they discuss is still regular matter but of opposing charge which annihilate.

  • @arnoldduran4953
    @arnoldduran49532 жыл бұрын

    I absolutly LOVED seeing them geek out with eacher - the banter was hilarious and intellegent - it was brilliant🤤

  • @matkagrogan5251

    @matkagrogan5251

    Жыл бұрын

    What’s so *ucking brilliant about that? They laugh like idiots not even trying to explain anything; what a waste of time and money

  • @Constantinesis
    @Constantinesis4 жыл бұрын

    Scientists and artists are so much alike. They both put 100% of passion and dedication into their work.

  • @cl4rkj0hns0n1

    @cl4rkj0hns0n1

    4 жыл бұрын

    Funny I had that exact thought, around 29:00 was a beautiful conversation, two briliant people brain storming a theoretical way to transport anti-hydrogen. I love how naturally that conversation occured as a product of two genuis minds

  • @WillDanceAlone2U
    @WillDanceAlone2U3 жыл бұрын

    It's really beautiful to see intelligent people have such a humorous and informative conversation about a complicated subject. Really enjoyable!

  • @robertgarrett9503

    @robertgarrett9503

    3 жыл бұрын

    I thought the same thing

  • @Ganttura1

    @Ganttura1

    3 жыл бұрын

    @Nemesis Explain how does one perceive an intelligent individual? I thought that all of the speakers here were highly intelligent with different views on certain subjects.

  • @The2ndhandsock

    @The2ndhandsock

    3 жыл бұрын

    ppl exist who only come here to feel intelligent. no joking.

  • @reessoft9416

    @reessoft9416

    3 жыл бұрын

    @Nemesis If you're an astrophysicist or a particle physicist then you're highly intelligent. Universities don't give science degrees and PHDs away. Making advances in science requires intelligent, creative and logical thinking. There's science behind physics theories - foundations in physics and maths. It's not guesswork. Scientists are constantly challenged by other scientists to prove their findings. A theory needs to be peer reviewed before it can even be published in a scientific journal.

  • @edwood6015

    @edwood6015

    3 жыл бұрын

    @Igor Mateus I disagree with your idea that intelligence should be quantified by the ability to create knowledge. I believe intelligence should be defined by one's understanding of that knowledge.

  • @lisamuir8850
    @lisamuir8850Ай бұрын

    I enjoyed watching these interviews. Loved the humor and the breaking it down descriptive way for those of us not familiar with most of these things. Greatly appreciated this. Thank you. Am looking forward to more.

  • @minuteorlesspiano8858
    @minuteorlesspiano88583 жыл бұрын

    The theory near the end, of the identical U and U(bar) universes was mindblowing... new idea for me to churn around in my head.

  • @bobeverton7561
    @bobeverton75614 жыл бұрын

    particles and antiparticles are opposite vibrations in a field. When the meet the two vibrations cancel each other out and energy is added back into the vacuum. Enough energy can create new vibrations. At the end of the day, only stable fields can continue to exist.

  • @wyrdingroom6081

    @wyrdingroom6081

    3 жыл бұрын

    i may one day wrap my mind around the asymmetrical nature of this universe.. at what point in time when the cats eat enough of the anticats does matter self annihilate?

  • @manmeetworld

    @manmeetworld

    Жыл бұрын

    It's 4 AM I'm heading to work and this is probably the clearest explanation in fewest words I've heard yet.

  • @midi510
    @midi5103 жыл бұрын

    I like what Neil has to say at the end about a new more efficient, more elegant understanding of physics and assert that it will be based on consciousness being fundamental and everything else emerging from it.

  • @Fanguru666

    @Fanguru666

    2 жыл бұрын

    4455

  • @andyveniegas7655

    @andyveniegas7655

    Жыл бұрын

    I was challenged to study more especially on the fronti

  • @JohnSmith-vq1co
    @JohnSmith-vq1co3 жыл бұрын

    I feel so lucky to spend my rainy day watching these excellent discussions about the World.

  • @sheph1145
    @sheph11452 жыл бұрын

    I'm convinced in the next decade Neil Turok will be proven right. Nature, in its beauty always seems to use the most elegant and simplest solutions.

  • @nowhereman8374
    @nowhereman83745 жыл бұрын

    What a wonderful world we live in with beautiful minds like these.

  • @fiziksisfun5317

    @fiziksisfun5317

    5 жыл бұрын

    ^ not all minds are quite so beautiful lol

  • @Dude_Slick

    @Dude_Slick

    4 жыл бұрын

    If these guys(&gals) are correct, this is a horrible world. Don't get me wrong, I love Physics. I'm currently reading Brian's book "The Elegant Universe", and find him to be a very sharp guy. Don't sell yourself or other average joes short when talking about beautiful minds. There is a whole other side to reality they refuse to address, and which some in this group dismiss outright with zero consideration.. You can be a deep thinker yourself, with ideas about reality that never even crossed the minds of those on the stage. Think about it.

  • @rickardoramchand6466

    @rickardoramchand6466

    3 жыл бұрын

    their minds are great mine well is brutish.

  • @abdulrahmanwaleed1852

    @abdulrahmanwaleed1852

    3 жыл бұрын

    all praise to god the almighty creator who created this

  • @bambangkurniawan5634

    @bambangkurniawan5634

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@Dude_Slick Would love to hear your opinion or commentary on this, especially the part they failed to address if you don't mind. I got zero knowledge on physics, but like to hear people talk about it.

  • @klumaverik
    @klumaverik5 жыл бұрын

    I love how they share their expertise and knowledge. It's quite spectacular when such amazing people get together like this. I wish I were smarter. I wish I could close my eyes and focus hard enough to cause an avalanche of new neural connections and plasticity finding myself more perceptive and ingenious. Instead I just about forget everything that's important while the only things that stay fresh are my abilities to chew, poop, and tap screens.

  • @paulwary

    @paulwary

    3 жыл бұрын

    On the bright side, you can still chew and poop.

  • @cherrydragon3120

    @cherrydragon3120

    2 жыл бұрын

    You might find out Some of this knowledge may stay behind in memory. And it can be triggered someday in conversation. And suddenly you remember shit said here and look like a DAMN smart hooman

  • @severe1878

    @severe1878

    2 жыл бұрын

    I also can chew poop while tapping screens

  • @johnlonkert7187

    @johnlonkert7187

    5 ай бұрын

    Step a. Put down the thingy you are busy tap tapping away on. The best way to retain memories we create is to slow the bombardment of constant info, especially since most of the info we tend to zone out on the deepest are the most interestingly bullshit stuff. Take notes...with actual pen and paper...deep, detailed notes, and study them daily. Add to them. Form your personal belief in what you are learning, make it mean more than just an interesting idea. Come up with arguments supporting your beliefs...then come up with arguments against them. Parse them deeply. At least, thats how I try and gain and retain knowledge.

  • @kevin_delaney
    @kevin_delaney3 жыл бұрын

    As much as I appreciate staying on track, I do find the hypothetical antihydrogen conversations, the conversations where physicists minds wonder, even more fascinating. I think those conversations should be allowed to wonder a bit more.

  • @jimwhitehead1532

    @jimwhitehead1532

    2 жыл бұрын

    Another take: they didn't want to publicly discuss an area of current highly classified research.

  • @kevin_delaney

    @kevin_delaney

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@jimwhitehead1532 Lmfao yeah, that is most likely the issue. It kills me though because education and innovation is stifled so much because of confidential and classified programs. When I attended school for advanced manufacturing (Precision Machining and CNC Automation) I got intrigued by radioactive machining and superalloy (nickel based) manufacturing methods and it's only ever really used in defense or aerospace applications, it's nearly impossible to learn about. From purely an educational standpoint, it is exceedingly frustrating, as a student that just wants to learn more. I'd love to work in research and development in some of those classified programs, I find physics and that level of chemistry/material science so fascinating!

  • @jimwhitehead1532

    @jimwhitehead1532

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@kevin_delaney Remember the Dan Brown book and movie "Angels and Demons" about a stolen canister of antimatter that threatened the Vatican? They cut off discussion right away, to not help the bad guys. IMHO, read the book if you can. It is way better than the movie.

  • @kevin_delaney

    @kevin_delaney

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@jimwhitehead1532 Hmm, I will, I've been meaning to anyway, thank you.

  • @jimwhitehead1532

    @jimwhitehead1532

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@kevin_delaney You are welcome. I just started Andy Weir's new space novel "Hail Mary" which may be made into a movie in several years, like "The Martian" was.

  • @sergiofalcao3691
    @sergiofalcao36912 жыл бұрын

    Thank you all so much for translating cutting edge knowledge in terms that we can tackle.

  • @cherrydragon3120

    @cherrydragon3120

    2 жыл бұрын

    Ikr, its actualy great to Actualy be ablr to understand this kind of science without looking at equations that cause us depression on the fundamental level

  • @auxbonnieux
    @auxbonnieux4 жыл бұрын

    Brian Greene is awesome. Don't know physics, never studied it..but I love hearing these talks

  • @aurelias9539

    @aurelias9539

    2 жыл бұрын

    If you have put a battery into anything to create a circuit you've encountered and thus know physics

  • @theresachung703

    @theresachung703

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@aurelias9539 love your answer. Beautiful

  • @tdhanasekaran3536
    @tdhanasekaran35365 жыл бұрын

    I love Brian. He makes complex concepts in Physics make me follow even though I am not trained in Physics. Very enjoyable and delightful discussions.

  • @mscir

    @mscir

    3 жыл бұрын

    Agreed, he's really good at explaining it in a way an average person can understand it, to me that shows that he understands it very well.

  • @mexxi01klagenfurt

    @mexxi01klagenfurt

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@mscir yes, but I have to say that 'the average person' in this comment section is rather intelligent, at least interested in trying to understand complicated issues.

  • @ioannisimansola7115

    @ioannisimansola7115

    2 жыл бұрын

    @Mike S Not trained in Physics ? This is why you think you understand

  • @DraganaDjermanovic
    @DraganaDjermanovic3 жыл бұрын

    Such an inspiring conversation. Thank you so much.

  • @one9sixoh

    @one9sixoh

    3 жыл бұрын

    your very pretty

  • @joeshumo9457
    @joeshumo94572 жыл бұрын

    I always get the feeling that at some point in experimental physics, in our effort to discover the true nature of the universe, somehow un-intuitively create a black swan event that wipes us out. I don’t believe it is likely to ever actually happen, but...

  • @Ckbtony1983

    @Ckbtony1983

    2 жыл бұрын

    But what if the universe itself has an anti universe and theres a copy of us seperated by a thin veil

  • @joeblog2672

    @joeblog2672

    7 ай бұрын

    I think we are allowed by some Creator to comprehend so much of the nature of the universe at so much a time. Most of the advancements in science over the centuries has come about not from outright wrongs or complete errors but from highly accurate foundations which are simply limited in the scope of their application. Probably the best example of such is comparing Newton to Einstein. Newton's formulae to explain gravity are near perfect when describing macroscopic entities in motion but they fail when taking into account heavier masses and speeds. Newton's math was far more responsible than anyone else's advanced math for NASA getting men on the moon and back. Then Einstein comes along and corrects Newton's gravity math while also providing a better picture of gravity as being defined as the curving of spacetime by mass (and thus energy too). But now quantum mechanics comes along and says "Hold on you Einstein. Your gravity math doesn't work at my level". Unfortunately QM hasn't revealed the true nature of its gravity math (the elusive quantum gravity). Whoever figures this out will be the new Einstein, just as Einstein was the new Newton or Galileo if you prefer.

  • @collinwalker550
    @collinwalker5505 жыл бұрын

    Getting to the end of this video and seeing Neil Turok's model of the universe was weird as hell... As an uneducated worker, I got into physics a while ago. A little over a year ago, I learned that antimatter was just time reversed matter, and I spent several weeks contemplating this, and then further on the topic of this video: why the universe exists if antimatter and matter was created in equal. I literally came to the conclusion that the big bang must be symetrical in time, and began drawing a model exactly like that of Turok's... but I had never heard of that before. I honestly thought it was just my uneducated imagination going wild and really never took it seriously. But seeing this video now, that some theoretical physicist way smarter than I came to the same conclusion (I'm sure in much more detail), is really mind blowing. This is tripping me out.

  • @LuisAldamiz

    @LuisAldamiz

    5 жыл бұрын

    Well, you're not the only one, Colin: I've also contemplated that very same notion since I learned a bit about Feynman's diagrams, which seems to be what is inspiring Turok after all. He's saying: we've tried to do it all over-complicated and it didn't work, why not go back to "the basics", and, if we do that, maybe it's all a bit simpler an we just can't experience (most of) the antimatter that there is because it is in the "wrong" time direction... somehow. I thinking of that: it can be all kinds of wrong, because my knowledge is way too limited. Some guy on the Internet (i.e. you) saying that: same thing or worse. But Neil Turok saying that, then it becomes authority and therefore quite plausible. Of course he can be wrong as well but at the very least he seems to know what he is talking about, so...

  • @collinwalker550

    @collinwalker550

    5 жыл бұрын

    Amar Salih Šehić But without men like Neil Turok, we wouldn't be pushing the limits and possibilities of science. Without pushing the limits and possibilities of science, there can be no experiments. I say if one man has an exceptional ability in a particular area of study, let him work where he may yield the most value for everyone. Those whom are better with the stock market should work with the stock market. Those whom are exceptional fundraisers should be fundraisers. The most value we can get is when everyone does what they are best in rather than trying to fill needed roles with people who are mediocre or not as skilled in that area. Neil Turok is very much needed where he currently is in my opinion.

  • @NicholasA231

    @NicholasA231

    5 жыл бұрын

    I agree. When he started getting into his explanation I was thinking oh my god, yes! I also have no physics education, and struggle to understand a lot of the things I'd like to because I don't possess the math to enable those revelations but, even though there are critical details of what I just heard that I can't now explain to someone else, it made an awful lot of sense to me. Not in a metaphysical sort of way or anything. Just in a sense that science seems to often have these build-ups of theory, eventually constructing this contraption resembling Rube-Goldberg's finest, until someone comes along, walks over, and just flips the switch on. Which I guess is pretty much what he was saying. I would almost certainly be an experimentalist if I were in physics, but there is this deep excitement for the development of theory too. I really have no place to even have an opinion on these things, but it's fascinating. I wonder about this stuff and really need to educate myself more deeply. Like, photons don't experience time. From their "perspective" they are born and die at precisely the same instant. Nevermind that we see them maybe 14 billion years after they formed. I wonder things like, does that relate to what he's saying here? Was there an epoch where none of the "stuff" experienced time, then god peeked in the box and poof, okay matter it is, -BANG-? Anyway, cool stuff.

  • @Jason-gt2kx

    @Jason-gt2kx

    5 жыл бұрын

    Maybe the mechanism of the black box is the positrons converting into dark matter. I believe dark matter isn't a ghost particle sitting ON the spacetime fabric, but rather positron's converted energy imprinted INSIDE OF spacetime. I think dark matter is empty fixed energy fields creating gravity wells. Spacetime hit a yield point during inflation and somehow the broken symmetry and lost positrons created potential energy in a phase transition. This hypothesis solves two problems and supports the conservation of energy.

  • @derbigpr500

    @derbigpr500

    5 жыл бұрын

    It's by far the most likely of the explanations talked about in this video.

  • @HadzDaddy2014
    @HadzDaddy20143 жыл бұрын

    Brian you have no doubt given me a huge expanding interest in physica

  • @oma2635

    @oma2635

    2 жыл бұрын

    some one girl???????? who single Mather and where is coming from chil tell AS who is father you not me not but she plays games in the would who single Mather we asking history where is coming from

  • @Nathan-gn3ls

    @Nathan-gn3ls

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@oma2635 Wat?

  • @lesliehlopez3834
    @lesliehlopez38342 жыл бұрын

    Meeting of Great Minds is a precious gift to us the Audience. Thanks Bryan for your masterful ability to allow the main discussion never to go too far astray.

  • @Vikezupa
    @Vikezupa3 жыл бұрын

    As a layman, I’ve learned more from Brian Green about the ideas behind physics (a topic that screams complexity) than most other experts of less complex fields.

  • @Scema12

    @Scema12

    3 жыл бұрын

    Yah but yah it

  • @Scema12

    @Scema12

    3 жыл бұрын

    Yah but

  • @MichaelReeser
    @MichaelReeser4 жыл бұрын

    I'm spending my covid 19 isolation rewatching my favorite WSF videos. As I read the comments I see that I'm not the only one.

  • @zerozero7even

    @zerozero7even

    3 жыл бұрын

    Michal Reeser:Millions of universes, so I don.t thik U r the only one, me3!

  • @brettsheridan6881

    @brettsheridan6881

    3 жыл бұрын

    I’m doing the same! Happy educating!

  • @absolutelyfookinnobody2843

    @absolutelyfookinnobody2843

    3 жыл бұрын

    Yea, no shit

  • @Dontbelieve9

    @Dontbelieve9

    3 жыл бұрын

    Good luck 🍀

  • @psi4262

    @psi4262

    2 жыл бұрын

    Bruh im commenting just to remind you to rewatch it again

  • @johnmastros9042
    @johnmastros90423 жыл бұрын

    The best thing about lockdown is these amazing videos

  • @sblopp

    @sblopp

    2 жыл бұрын

    I've learned so much

  • @MichaelAntonFischer
    @MichaelAntonFischer3 жыл бұрын

    Neil's explanation is great. It fits with all we see and is a very good formulation of exactly the picture I have had from the past few years studying quantum physics

  • @tensevo

    @tensevo

    2 жыл бұрын

    It's elegant, but how does one explain anti matter observed in the world of matter? Surely you would be oblivious to the existence of anti matter.

  • @MichaelAntonFischer

    @MichaelAntonFischer

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@tensevo why would that be? Everytime particles come into existence there is matter and anti matter. It’s rather how little anti matter there is that it’s a bit harder too explain

  • @tensevo

    @tensevo

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@MichaelAntonFischer yes, but according to this, all particles came into existence at the big bang. The matter went forward in time and the anti matter went backwards in time.

  • @MichaelAntonFischer

    @MichaelAntonFischer

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@tensevo no

  • @MammalMan
    @MammalMan5 жыл бұрын

    I have never smiled or laughed this much while listening to a science discussion. This has got to be one of my favorite videos ever!

  • @MammalMan

    @MammalMan

    5 жыл бұрын

    I smiled because of the jokes they cracked during the discussion

  • @tonywhite68

    @tonywhite68

    5 жыл бұрын

    I agree. Marcela especially was a delight though they were all obviously having fun. Makes the topic easier to watch.

  • @bill-zy6dg

    @bill-zy6dg

    5 жыл бұрын

    Hands down, I find Andre Linde the funniest man in Physics. Check any panel that includes him. He was great with Alan Guth and others on a multiverse WSF type discussion.

  • @mscottveach

    @mscottveach

    5 жыл бұрын

    @Enter the Braggn' No, it's not.

  • @mscottveach

    @mscottveach

    5 жыл бұрын

    @Enter the Braggn' who is presenting never-ending mathematical speculation as the true and confirmed nature of our existence? even if they were, that'd be funny not sad. but no one's really doing that, are they?

  • @davesatxify
    @davesatxify5 жыл бұрын

    one of the best presentations by the world science festival i've seen and i think i've watched them all. thank you brian and every one of these immensely talented people.

  • @olgavolchansky4372
    @olgavolchansky4372 Жыл бұрын

    Thank you! This is so fascinating. I am an outsider to this field, but everything was explained so well, made very easy to understand. Thank you!

  • @elibaez582
    @elibaez5823 жыл бұрын

    I have no idea what’s going on but I enjoy their company :)

  • @edlynnnau536
    @edlynnnau5364 жыл бұрын

    What a VERY fun group. Taught us a lot AND made us laugh. Would have loved to have heard the end of some of those side conversations. Excellent symposium on antimatter.

  • @JohnSmith-vq1co

    @JohnSmith-vq1co

    3 жыл бұрын

    34:35 I thought those "P" meant Planets lol No Wonder we are left with One Planet out of other billions of Planets that can sustain life.

  • @milkinsinc6875

    @milkinsinc6875

    2 жыл бұрын

    P

  • @Les537
    @Les5375 жыл бұрын

    I watched Feynman lectures before this and the whole time I was thinking positron is electron going backwards in time and there is your missing anti matter. Then Neil, sitting quiet the whole time, ends with just that idea. Nice.

  • @jamesellis6599

    @jamesellis6599

    5 жыл бұрын

    crush537 getuar

  • @sumsar01

    @sumsar01

    3 жыл бұрын

    Ye it's a historical artifact and mostly a joke.

  • @silberlinie
    @silberlinie2 ай бұрын

    There is a fascinating elegance in observing how the caste of former storytellers, magicians, conjurers, sorcerers and necromancers have found a home in the new teaching - what we now call 'The Science'. With a grace that almost gives the appearance of believability, they are able to take us away from the triviality of our everyday thoughts. They strive to introduce us to the dazzling spheres of actual reality and to reveal their pulsating dance to us.

  • @47nimish
    @47nimish2 жыл бұрын

    Nothing more to say about the whole discussion as already many comments has done... but the Graphic animation in the beginning with the music and Brian voice.. is just so amazingly Satisfying to watch.

  • @priyabratadash381
    @priyabratadash3813 жыл бұрын

    It's really a brilliant discussion that I will love to watch again and again. The different perspectives to understand the grand design of this universe is something worthy listening and watching. Thank you Prof. Brian Greene and other eminent scientists in this video....

  • @Dr10Jeeps
    @Dr10Jeeps4 жыл бұрын

    These types of discussions are what make the internet so interesting. Thank you again Dr. Brian Greene.

  • @chrisparker5796

    @chrisparker5796

    3 жыл бұрын

    Dr10Jeeps your welcome Jeeps.

  • @sheilamacpherson4948

    @sheilamacpherson4948

    3 жыл бұрын

    Yes. I dreamed of this as a kid. Now it's real. So cool.

  • @MrAlkyd

    @MrAlkyd

    3 жыл бұрын

    Yeeaaahhh... if the generator in the background would be silenced then it would be a decent intellectual conversation. Now it seems like they're in a workshop..

  • @schrodingersdad6077

    @schrodingersdad6077

    3 жыл бұрын

    Truly amazing time we live in. Such an intellectually stimulating conversation, available at the touch of your fingertip.

  • @johnanderson3475
    @johnanderson34753 жыл бұрын

    The "angels and demons" dialogue was actually pleasant. It puts things into perspective for those who are not physicists. Really wanted them to finish that conversation, damn it. Hahahah

  • @jimsteen911

    @jimsteen911

    3 жыл бұрын

    Yeah green is a tightwad

  • @Fanguru666

    @Fanguru666

    2 жыл бұрын

    7541

  • @theresachung703
    @theresachung7032 жыл бұрын

    Brian is my hero for caring about ideas for us, the lay folk

  • @theresachung703

    @theresachung703

    2 жыл бұрын

    And I love how the Japanese dude is just wearing a short sleeve shirt. Super chill and nerdy.

  • @fullsendcirca9255
    @fullsendcirca92553 жыл бұрын

    I’ve read some of his work and just the way he talks about these complex questions of the nature of our reality in such a simple way it’s almost like a children’s book.

  • @paddymcdoogle6753

    @paddymcdoogle6753

    2 жыл бұрын

    Because, why make things complex? The more humble you are, the 'less is more'.

  • @fullsendcirca9255

    @fullsendcirca9255

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@paddymcdoogle6753 you misunderstood what I said. I’m saying he makes complicated subjects sound so simple because hes that knowledgeable….got it?

  • @paddymcdoogle6753

    @paddymcdoogle6753

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@fullsendcirca9255 Why don't you shut your mouth up? Got it? Cringe.

  • @fullsendcirca9255

    @fullsendcirca9255

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@paddymcdoogle6753 how about no? Don’t need to open your mouth typing. You’re the one replying cuz ur butt hurt over nothing? Not my fault you can’t understand there’s complicated things in this world. Talk about cringe.

  • @kenadams5504

    @kenadams5504

    8 ай бұрын

    @@fullsendcirca9255 I saw one of his descriptions .... " small writing on a pre-inflated balloon is comparable to quantum fluctuations before the big bang ; as inflation of the balloon creates big writing , similarly , the quantum fluctuations create the 'cosmic microwave Background' . The best bit is that scientists calculated differances in temperature in the pre-big bang quantum fluctuations and then , demonstrated the identical temperature differances throughout the CMB (in our universe).

  • @user-ch2sh4rm9d
    @user-ch2sh4rm9d5 жыл бұрын

    اكتشاف الاكوان المنسوجه I have questions about the theory of woven universes The woven universes are connected together in the cosmic carpet But these woven universes are separate in time Because there are new universes because of spatial expansion 1-The first question is about the density of matter and energy in the universe How much energy and matter is there in the universe? 2-The second question is about the curvature of the universe Is it a zero curvature or positive curvature or negative curvature ??? 3-The third question about the extension of the place of the universe Is the extension of the universe final or has an infinite stretch? If we live in the Infinite Universe, this is evidence of the existence of the woven universes Please send my three questions to cosmologists .

  • @pjcle1

    @pjcle1

    4 жыл бұрын

    I think you are talking about string theory? There are places like Cosmic Queries Star Talk or Sam Harris Ask Me Anything, you can send in questions.

  • @78tag
    @78tag3 жыл бұрын

    After listening to this panel speak ( calm, quiet. rational, respectful of each other, clear of thought, etc, etc ) it really makes you wonder what kind of a world we could live in if all of our, so-called, "leaders" were like these people. The idea that people like this could do a better job of running the world might be a concept that is too naive but I find it to be an interesting daydream. I qualify this in consideration that I used to think of Brian Greene as my hero in scientific thought until I heard some of his political jokes that exposed his sub-agenda ( we all know there is much more to jokes than meets the eye ). Who knows what is under the "sheep's clothing" with any particular individual but I sure did enjoy all of his guests here tonight. Neil Turok in particular seems to be an ideal human being. I think I have a new "hero".

  • @rogerwidmer6428

    @rogerwidmer6428

    2 жыл бұрын

    ⁰8

  • @theresachung703

    @theresachung703

    2 жыл бұрын

    IKR. But scientists can be/are also power maniacal and exploitative. But the ideal is beautiful.

  • @beckyweaver5981

    @beckyweaver5981

    2 жыл бұрын

    Our govt should be run by a PANEL of people who’s terms are staggered. Get rid of this idiotic 2-3 party system that divides people.

  • @jasonh6919

    @jasonh6919

    2 жыл бұрын

    Watch Real Genius. That's a great depiction of an ego-manical intellectual who gets a taste of power and runs with it. I think we ought to have psych exams for our leaders, because people who seek out power, especially via politics, have some pretty scary thoughts going on in there.

  • @astridwindfuhrnz

    @astridwindfuhrnz

    2 жыл бұрын

    I agree with you completely. Unfortunately the political ‘animal’ seems to be more Machiavellian…..

  • @kapilchaudaha9679
    @kapilchaudaha96792 жыл бұрын

    What a precise work the projector operators are doing!

  • @inesmercier1948
    @inesmercier19485 жыл бұрын

    they're all amazing but i must say Marcela Carena blew my mind

  • @elmalito79

    @elmalito79

    5 жыл бұрын

    Inès Mercier there’s something strange about cern .... and her link about the movie she talk about....

  • @veronicagorosito187

    @veronicagorosito187

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@elmalito79 could you tell what?

  • @sittowardi6781

    @sittowardi6781

    4 жыл бұрын

    Carlos Valencia what do you mean? Please elaborate, I’m interested in what you are saying.

  • @steveblanmag7410

    @steveblanmag7410

    4 жыл бұрын

    I love Marcela's manner of speaking. Never having studied physics, I get lost quickly. But I still want to understand what she's saying. I also like Dr Muriyama's manner of speaking but for a completely different reason.

  • @Bix12

    @Bix12

    4 жыл бұрын

    she blew my brain

  • @JAGuy
    @JAGuy4 жыл бұрын

    I want to see like 10 philosophers just come together and talk about life and asking each other questions and saying why answers to these would be wrong or not the best answers

  • @mattneville2864
    @mattneville28643 жыл бұрын

    29.17: that cracked me up! Would have loved to hear two physics go at it.

  • @alexgoslar4057
    @alexgoslar40572 жыл бұрын

    I have been watching this presentation time and again. It is well narated and informative. Thank you for sharing.

  • @hamentaschen
    @hamentaschen5 жыл бұрын

    Thank you WSF!!! I literally wait all year for this.

  • @kkevan4138

    @kkevan4138

    5 жыл бұрын

    Is it possible for Anti-Atoms to make Anti-Elements? And then Anti-Molecules...Anti-Radiation and so on?

  • @osvaldoires8071

    @osvaldoires8071

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@kkevan4138 Is it possible for Anti-Atoms to make Anti-Elements? And then Anti-Molecules...Anti-Radiation and so on? É possível que os anti-átomos façam anti-elementos? E então Anti-Moléculas ... Anti-Radiação e assim por diante?

  • @kkevan4138

    @kkevan4138

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@osvaldoires8071 exactly

  • @saraha8454
    @saraha84544 жыл бұрын

    What a fantastic discussion, amazing speakers. Very well done 👍🏼

  • @johnmerryfield5740
    @johnmerryfield57403 жыл бұрын

    I can listen to this for hours and understand it for seconds

  • @theyshouldhavenevergivenme5439

    @theyshouldhavenevergivenme5439

    3 жыл бұрын

    Ih

  • @OldNavajoTricks

    @OldNavajoTricks

    3 жыл бұрын

    Uncles Luke and Bob, no aunts living, Cousins, Steve, Nathan and Natalie, Siblings Geoffrey, Marcus and Ellesania, both parents deceased.

  • @batfastard5577

    @batfastard5577

    3 жыл бұрын

    Want more?)

  • @jimwhitehead1532
    @jimwhitehead15322 жыл бұрын

    Wild guess: Is antimatter simply time-reversed normal matter? One theorem says they are mathematically identical. Also, Feynman diagrams predict brief time reversals in particle interactions. If so, then in the Big Bang, did half the energy as anti-matter go backwards in time, vanishing from our sight and did our matter go forward in time?

  • @reversatire7724

    @reversatire7724

    2 жыл бұрын

    A great question

  • @pavelghalychuk

    @pavelghalychuk

    2 жыл бұрын

    1:28:00

  • @arnaudjean1159

    @arnaudjean1159

    2 жыл бұрын

    In others dimensions

  • @stephenmayo9573

    @stephenmayo9573

    2 жыл бұрын

    Please stop, that makes my head hurt.

  • @trebledog

    @trebledog

    2 жыл бұрын

    That spliff done been smoked.

  • @greg5326
    @greg53264 жыл бұрын

    What I find interesting is that these talks can be done all in English. It seems that geniuses all around the world pick up English along the way and I greatly appreciate it.

  • @Natsukashii-Records

    @Natsukashii-Records

    4 жыл бұрын

    Gotta love having gone through imperialism in the past.

  • @jamesmitchell6925
    @jamesmitchell69255 жыл бұрын

    I was a little bummed when Brian cut off the Angels and Demons debate about the ability to contain anti-hydrogen.

  • @IndefinitePrawn

    @IndefinitePrawn

    5 жыл бұрын

    Well... my fuse blew too!

  • @NoActuallyGo-KCUF-Yourself

    @NoActuallyGo-KCUF-Yourself

    5 жыл бұрын

    Same. If the anti-hydrogen is not charged, it can't be controlled with electric or magnetic fields. How else to hold it together and not let it touch any normal matter.

  • @JSprayaEntertainment

    @JSprayaEntertainment

    5 жыл бұрын

    lol .. and we have the same initials

  • @perkodanny

    @perkodanny

    5 жыл бұрын

    Be careful. You might be on a watchlist now.

  • @cocosloan3748

    @cocosloan3748

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@NoActuallyGo-KCUF-Yourself You got that wrong! Its charged but with opposite charge! You will need an anti-magnetic field which dont exist!

  • @craigwall9536
    @craigwall95363 жыл бұрын

    Neil just broke every heart in the room. Entire careers just got annihilated.

  • @DoctorWes
    @DoctorWes3 жыл бұрын

    It is mind blowing how far we go to try to create something other than matter and non-matter. I love the WSF because they have the freedom to explore!

  • @vanderdole02
    @vanderdole024 жыл бұрын

    There are fact three kinds of matter, Anti-matter, Matter, and Doesn't matter, the last one has no use what so ever.

  • @bobbyatman273

    @bobbyatman273

    3 жыл бұрын

    It does! It produces free time!

  • @omg11076

    @omg11076

    3 жыл бұрын

    Oh...

  • @joseluisalcantarasanchez269

    @joseluisalcantarasanchez269

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@bobbyatman273 Free time for us to enjoy, no matter what!

  • @mephistounderwood4917

    @mephistounderwood4917

    3 жыл бұрын

    And here I thought you might have had an insight of some kind, possibly concerning dark matter. Guess you fall under the category of doesn't matter...... Oh well, we can;t all be physicists. some of us have to be failed comedians.

  • @joseluisalcantarasanchez269

    @joseluisalcantarasanchez269

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@mephistounderwood4917 Of course! It is much better to laugh. Don't you agree?

  • @thehappyatheist1931
    @thehappyatheist19312 жыл бұрын

    I love how Greene monitors this group of scientists “nerding out” on over anti-matter. It’s endearing as well as fascinating.

  • @ngmui430

    @ngmui430

    2 жыл бұрын

    1:20.00 is when all the fruitless nerding out gets called out. its literally time to go in a different direction

  • @glenn-younger
    @glenn-younger2 жыл бұрын

    One of the many things I like about Brian Greene and the World Science Festival is how I always learn something new. This time, however, there were even a few belly laughs in the learning. GREAT panel of speakers. They each brought something to the table in a way that was very relatable to me. Thanks World Science Festival!

  • @kkuo326
    @kkuo3263 жыл бұрын

    ouch, 29:00 those two were arguing and Brian Greene smartly set the conversation on course.

  • @holysmolyo_o9828

    @holysmolyo_o9828

    3 жыл бұрын

    Yeah out of vatican 😂

  • @gusprooplik9068
    @gusprooplik90685 жыл бұрын

    Thank You . This session was very inspiring .

  • @jofischer3101

    @jofischer3101

    2 жыл бұрын

    Ted

  • @mdfknstarboy5311
    @mdfknstarboy53113 жыл бұрын

    Well thank you for this. It explains what can be seen with the naked eye. The picture at beginning helps. Except that they both intermingle together in a semi weaving motion around each other not cancel each other out.

  • @megnickle7698
    @megnickle76983 жыл бұрын

    Matter: the basis of all nuclear reactions Anti matter: to doesnt react, I picture a car battery a positive and a negative. So pos and negs are flying around with the charge of dark energy until they come close together and touch they then annihilate same with a battery. You get an electrical shock depending on the wattage of the battery lol I wonder what sends this positive and negative in directions without an original destination/purpose? What if they have a purpose? Is there some sort of genetic code for matter and anti matter? Do they abide by an unspoken law that we don't know about? Yes. They already keep a distance and are opposite. Sometimes opposites attract but those are the weaker and most defected ones who don't survive and go on to evolve abiding by the laws of evolution. I love thinking about these things. You guys are amazing. I hope life is treating you very well and you're all doing great. Stay safe. Thank you, Megan Nickle.

  • @df34788gmail
    @df34788gmail4 жыл бұрын

    Watching this was great! Great way to spend lockdown ( 4-09-2020), looking forward to the next one . ;-)

  • @vckrscindy

    @vckrscindy

    3 жыл бұрын

    Joking????

  • @WhoRaq
    @WhoRaq3 жыл бұрын

    Brian Greene is magical. Everyone on this stage is truly inspiring, I loved every minute

  • @aaronjames5276
    @aaronjames52762 жыл бұрын

    On a 1-10 scale, I'd give that around a 13. :) Between the pure information on one level, the charming nature of those delivering it, the excellent, really helpful metaphors and analogies, and the thankfully in-depth look at the different subject matter -- that was just great, helpful, and highly entertaining. And what more can you ask for, really?

  • @ReInCarbonatedCrow

    @ReInCarbonatedCrow

    2 жыл бұрын

    The guy in the middle reminds me of Mark Ruffalo's Bruce Banner, which might take this to a 14/10.

  • @neillibertine3044
    @neillibertine30442 жыл бұрын

    This is second part of Entropy, which includes entropy in terms of arrangement and probability. Suppose there are three color balls, r(red), g(green), b(blue) arranged in three places available for them. So they arranged like; rgb, rbg, bgr, brg, grb, gbr. There are six ways in which they can arranged this is permutation. If one more different color ball or place is added, pernutation or number of arrangement increases to twenty four, that is four multiply to six previous arrangements. Now as there is no preference of any arrangement and all are equally likelihood, so probability of any one selection is 1/6. Thus we see that probability of any selection decreases with increase in permutation or arrangements, and which is related to number of particles or participants which is ball in this case. Decrease in probability is increase in uncertainity or randomness or chaos. Now if in above case if two of ball are of same color, suppose there are three balls of two colors r(red) and b(blue). Then above six arrangements reduces to three; rbb, brb, bbr. So when particles becomes indistinguishable, permutation or arrangements decreases and thus probability of any one arrangement is increase. This type of permutation is equivalent to combination of choosing two balls from three balls of different colors. Probability distribution function of maxwellian particles which are considered as distinguishable is given by suppose, 1/X. Where X is permutation of particles. Similarly permutations of fermions and boson are X+1 and X-1. Both fermions and bosons are considered as indistinguishable particles but their probability distribution function is higher than maxwellian for boson is okay but lower than maxwellian for fermions shows that fermions are distinguishable particles and that is indicated by their spin half property which is basis for exclusion principle. Does there are three kind of particles, two of them are governed by quantum statics or there is one kind of particle given as classical one and there are three kind of distribution density states. Suppose permutation of particles having given higher energy is X, then its probability density function is given by, 1/X. This is known as Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution function where it gives probability of a particle having given energy at temperature. On increasing temperature, probability of particle having given energy increased. Probability of a particle having given energy is 1/X and probability of a particle to not have given energy is, 1 - 1/X or (X - 1)/X. Now ration of a particle having given energy to a particle not having energy is, 1/(X - 1). This is known as Bose-Einstein distribution function and it tells about probability of a particle to have given energy if there is no particle have that given energy before or say ratio of probability of a particle to have given energy to go higher energy level to release given energy to come back to lower energy level. In textbooks it is interpreted entirely different. Again probability of a particle having given energy is 1/X, and probability of another particle to have that same given energy is, 1 + 1/X or (X + 1)/ X. Now ratio of a particle having given energy and another particle to have same energy is given by, 1/(X + 1). Thus the probability of a particle having same energy as by another particle is decreased to if that energy is not occupied. This is known as Fermi-Dirac distribution. So we see that there are no more two other kinds of particles obeying quantum statics but conditional probability distribution of same kind of particles.

  • @rashadpreston7389
    @rashadpreston73895 жыл бұрын

    This was hella interesting and informative opened my eyes up to some things

  • @Only1INDRAJIT
    @Only1INDRAJIT5 жыл бұрын

    Good to see Mickey Rourke from Sin City talking about matter antimatter particles

  • @aurelias9539

    @aurelias9539

    2 жыл бұрын

    ??????????? Do u mean one of speakers looks like Mickey rourke? Just coz of his glasses? I'm bending my brain to try to see what you're talking abput more than the content lol

  • @SilverBee
    @SilverBee2 жыл бұрын

    I am simply blown away by how someone with no formal science education, who dropped out of high school algebra thinking she would never understand it can, under the tutelage of these marvelous physicists, begin to comprehend these scientific principles. Thank you all. Just know that you are making this old lady delighted and grateful.

  • @cherrydragon3120

    @cherrydragon3120

    2 жыл бұрын

    I mean... anyone could do that. Its literaly just using illustrations and animations that well... less intelligent people CAN comprehend. Unlike them, we never seen a proton before or a anti-neutron. They did. But we all have seen a dog before. So them comparing the anti-particles to dogs makes it more relatable to us qnd thus easier to understand. Like how you know the difference between a Circle, square and hexagon. But a todler does not. Until you show the difference and explain what this difference is. (The amount of corners) :)

  • @SilverBee

    @SilverBee

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@cherrydragon3120 I'm impressed by your response, Cherry Dragon. I, too, am so happy to have these understandable explanations. I don't consider myself or you as "less intelligent," rather it's just a matter of never having learned certain terminology and maths at an early age. From what I've read, some of the major scientists who came up with foundational theories and hypotheses visualized them first and worked out the explanations later. Seems like that puts us right in there with the big guys. (smile)

  • @whirledpeas3477
    @whirledpeas3477 Жыл бұрын

    Neil Turok is right on. He's not trying to be a comedian, just doing what he gets paid for.

  • @mukeshchand5301
    @mukeshchand53015 жыл бұрын

    This talk is wonderful .👌

  • @saurabh28k
    @saurabh28k5 жыл бұрын

    Thanks..now I can sleep while listening to the discussion

  • @Rajeshkumar-hs4so

    @Rajeshkumar-hs4so

    5 жыл бұрын

    saurabh28k Even me too

  • @h.u.t.9677

    @h.u.t.9677

    5 жыл бұрын

    i thought i was the only one, such as relief

  • @ggrthemostgodless8713

    @ggrthemostgodless8713

    5 жыл бұрын

    @@Amar061 Me too, or me four!! I half asleep and wake up with them on, it is illusory.

  • @2Worlds_and_InBetween

    @2Worlds_and_InBetween

    4 жыл бұрын

    Me six

  • @donniebaker5984

    @donniebaker5984

    4 жыл бұрын

    Ya sleeping through a free education is the best way to learn especially if you have a physics text book under your pillow as your brain will absorb knowledge from a high concentration to a severely low concentrate

  • @lucidinterval8012
    @lucidinterval80123 жыл бұрын

    I really liked the analogy that Marcela made about the musician and notes on a staff. Very good. 👍

  • @greggary7217
    @greggary72172 жыл бұрын

    I liked Neil Yurok’s view a lot - I’m not sure he really connected the dots in the quantum world sufficiently but if you get that movement in time is possible at the quantum level the rest becomes more plausible, and what the heck if it’s easier to understand I’m all for it.

  • @DrDeuteron

    @DrDeuteron

    9 ай бұрын

    He didn’t explain that part too well, but if you look at positronium decay to two gammas, it’s the same as Compton scattering in a precise mathematical way.

  • @mikemichaelmusic09
    @mikemichaelmusic093 жыл бұрын

    Go straight to the comments section to see what the Experts have to say about this video.

  • @smallstudiodesign

    @smallstudiodesign

    3 жыл бұрын

    🙃🤓😝😛🤪😜😂🤣👍🏼

  • @nk2ti

    @nk2ti

    3 жыл бұрын

    lmao

  • @no-nk6mj

    @no-nk6mj

    3 жыл бұрын

    Tig ol' Bitties ( * ) ( * )

  • @jackrobinson9403
    @jackrobinson94034 жыл бұрын

    What if antimatter reacts the opposite to gravity so it makes things anti move away from things of large positive mass. Does that make sense???

  • @FCHenchy

    @FCHenchy

    4 жыл бұрын

    It's something they are trying to test. Most theories fall on the regular-gravity side, though.

  • @Sadistichippo

    @Sadistichippo

    4 жыл бұрын

    The difficulty with going down this path is that gravity is a big unknown in particle physics. We simply don't have a solid model for gravity on a quantum level. And without a solid model, it's hard to build theories and by extension experiments. Your theory could well be correct, but so far our testing seems to show gravity affects matter and anti matter in the same way on a macroscopic scale.

  • @laurieslaathaug4600

    @laurieslaathaug4600

    4 жыл бұрын

    Then does anti-matter have negative mass based gravety. If most of an atoms mass comes from neutrons, with no charge, could it be possible that neutrons are interchangeable between matter and anti-matter? As with no charge they should, in theory, be interchangeable. A corection may be needed, if possible, type below.

  • @Smorss2011

    @Smorss2011

    4 жыл бұрын

    Gravity is a weak force, and wouldn't really affect objects far away.

  • @sumsar01

    @sumsar01

    3 жыл бұрын

    Anti-matter has normal gravity.

  • @ChrisBrengel
    @ChrisBrengel Жыл бұрын

    10:06 Physics equations analogy with music notation - brilliant!

  • @HawthorneHillNaturePreserve
    @HawthorneHillNaturePreserve Жыл бұрын

    I thought she was going to say, “The neat thing about this detector is that it’s a banana” Lol 😂

  • @mistersicko2666
    @mistersicko26665 жыл бұрын

    thanks for great discussion. WSF rocks.

  • @akzual50
    @akzual503 жыл бұрын

    Dirac *writes crazy equation* Science Experts: You can't do that!

  • @dutchesscostello7568

    @dutchesscostello7568

    3 жыл бұрын

    Ok ?

  • @iLLeag7e
    @iLLeag7e2 жыл бұрын

    Buddy this here World Science Festival content is fire! Excellent stuff, please keep it coming!

  • @timsexton
    @timsexton11 ай бұрын

    11:00 - Thank you for your analogy describing sheet music and musicians / theoretical equations and physicists. *_TRUST !!_*

  • @d.owenpowell9023
    @d.owenpowell90233 жыл бұрын

    I would love to hear the debate and theories on the conversation concerning the movie "Angles And Demons" and antimatter. Writers and scientists are curious. IMO. The moderator was instructed to move on, away from this narrative.

  • @HCG

    @HCG

    2 жыл бұрын

    Not everything is a fucking conspiracy, good lord.

  • @samsonian
    @samsonian3 жыл бұрын

    So what happens when you realize your whole life has been spent fervently waiting for bananas to do something interesting?

  • @caseyrayharris.esquire489

    @caseyrayharris.esquire489

    3 жыл бұрын

    Better life spent working watching bananas than working for a company that pays you to build buildings, teach the same thing or any other job that wouldn't discover anything new lol. Coming from the view point of living off week 2 weak weekly checks

  • @claffeysenegal9793

    @claffeysenegal9793

    2 жыл бұрын

    I think that white people that are total none drugs addicted,they think the best and they explained the best and they can organize the work force the best and and they can get things done right to have further advancement into the future of high technology to make progress.

  • @georgepaul5843
    @georgepaul58432 жыл бұрын

    Most wonderful presentation of a fundamental questions . Extremely confusing and controversial questions by the best knowledgeable people. Good job Brian Greene. The discussion may be outside your mathematical grasp, but it is most enlightening for all uninitiated. George Paul, AB.,BSc., UC Berkeley, M.D. UCSF, 1968..

  • @mdfknstarboy5311
    @mdfknstarboy53113 жыл бұрын

    The positives and negatives don't cancel each other out actually they can coexist together in an endless dance of interweaving motion around each other like two opposite magnets.

  • @jameslorman33

    @jameslorman33

    3 жыл бұрын

    Correct...and that's how an atom works....that is not what they're talking about here though....this talk is about a "thing" and an "anti-thing" .... completely different than a positive and a negative.

  • @jameslorman33

    @jameslorman33

    3 жыл бұрын

    Correct...and that's how an atom works....that is not what they're talking about here though....this talk is about a "thing" and an "anti-thing" .... completely different than a positive and a negative.

  • @OrionMichaelGuy
    @OrionMichaelGuy5 жыл бұрын

    The First State of Quantum Gravity (or Dark Energy Field) is the Crystal Core we are entangled in - The Crystal Core of the Black Hole in the Universe "Above Us" The Second State of Quantum Gravity is the Wormhole from this Universe to the Universe "Above Us" The Third State of the Dark Energy Field is the Void. The Void is referred to as the Dark Energy State - Dark Energy is Space - Space is not empty nothingness, Space is basically a Superfluid Liquid Crystal Structure that forms up one half of the Universe - The Universe is a Binary system, You have "Space" or more precisely "Dark Energy" and you have Matter/Energy - their interaction is the foundation of the Universe, Time, Gravity, Etc The 4th State of Quantum Gravity is the "Dark Matter State" - This is the State where the Galaxy creates a "bubble" around itself within the Void, where there is MORE Dark Energy outside the bubble that inside the bubble - All Matter/Energy is actively "PUSHING" on the Dark Energy Field with its Electromagnetic Energy - the Galaxy "pushes" against the force of the "Void" or the "Dark Energy State" with its Electromagnetic Radiation Energy - This Energy eventually decays and actually turns into more Space/Dark Energy! The 5th State of Quantum Gravity is the Crystal Iron Cores of the Cosmos, the Stars, Planets, Moons and Protoplanets, the "Cores of the Cosmos" are Crystal Core Quantum Computers, These Cores use their Electromagnetic Energy and create a "bubble" around themselves, where there is MORE Dark Energy on the outside of the bubble than inside - the Cores of the Cosmos form up the "Surface" or the "Surface of Life" - Man, or the Humanoid is the Primal of 5 - the Evolutionary Descendant and form the Cores chose to create as their "vessels of flesh" The 6th State of Quantum Gravity is the Surface of the Atom - There is More Dark Energy on the outside of the Atom than inside the Atom The 7th, 8th and 9th States of Quantum Gravity are the Shells within the Atom The 10th Quantum State of Gravity is the Black Hole, which leads to a new set of Quantum States of Gravity! The Crystal Core of the Black Hole leads to a new Universe - Universes within Universes To understand this, how the Universe creates Gravity and Time, you need to understand that "Time" is the Interaction of Matter/Energy and Space/Dark Energy - so the MORE Dark Energy interacting with Matter, the More Time can occur Gravity is the Electromagnetic Force Matter exerts on the Universe, on Dark Energy that creates a "Dark Energy Field Effect" or Gravity - what that means is that Matter pushes Space away from itself and Space pushes back, as each piece of Matter gets close to each other, their "Distortion Fields" touch each other and so this creates a "Path of Least Resistance" and Pushes Matter together - Dark Energy is Pushing all Matter together! "Does Space have Density" - YES - That's why we have "Gravity Waves" - So, the Denser the "Space" (which is really Dark Energy) the more Time can occur, the less "Space" the less Time can occur Motion of Matter Equals Gravity Equals Energy (Plus about 10%) - It's the very motion of Matter over the Dark Energy Field that creates the Electromagnetic Energy - so the FASTER MATTER IS MOVING THE HEAVIER IT GETS The FASTER Matter moves, the the MORE Electromagnetic Energy it produces - therefore the more it pushes on "Space" and therefore the harder space pushes back - this is Gravity The FASTER Matter moves, the MORE Electromagnetic Energy it produces - therefore the more is pushes on "Space" the LESS "Space" is interacting with Matter, and Therefore THE LESS TIME!

  • @wbiro

    @wbiro

    5 жыл бұрын

    Too bad physicists do not go through KZread comments, then they could point out the fundamental errors of the uninformed wild imaginings of most commenters... KZread can afford to hire many, and they should (and that would go for all the other branches of science, too)...

  • @pb4520
    @pb45204 жыл бұрын

    thankyou for this !

  • @SalathielGeneseYimgaYimga
    @SalathielGeneseYimgaYimga2 жыл бұрын

    I am a software developer but these physicians really make the thing understandable... Thank you guys.

  • @robertnewhart3547
    @robertnewhart35476 ай бұрын

    When condescending whiny pompousness meets physicist, you get Bryan Greene.

  • @sujitmohanty1
    @sujitmohanty14 жыл бұрын

    These are very intelligent people....loved it! The vive and the atmosphere was indeed one of its kind!!! This turok guy is a god...

  • @mariaroque3200

    @mariaroque3200

    3 жыл бұрын

    These ppl are fckn idiots lmao!

  • @leahvance1840

    @leahvance1840

    3 жыл бұрын

    Maria Roque becons clay ol

  • @nomanulhaqkhan8135
    @nomanulhaqkhan81354 жыл бұрын

    When scientists watch scifi movies...i wonder if they categorise it as comedy

  • @sekoivu

    @sekoivu

    4 жыл бұрын

    The most probably, yes. Sometimes a very bad comedy tho.

  • @ThePrldiamonds

    @ThePrldiamonds

    4 жыл бұрын

    🍎

  • @carlbrowitt6221

    @carlbrowitt6221

    4 жыл бұрын

    A lot of science fiction movies are based around reality,,, but its gonna be pretty hairy here on earth if there is a positive me and you and everyone else on this planet,,,, that would be catastrophic to meet them face to face

  • @leosmi1

    @leosmi1

    4 жыл бұрын

    I lost

  • @monkeybusiness673

    @monkeybusiness673

    4 жыл бұрын

    Sometimes, yes. It's why I like Star Trek a lot...the Technobabble is sometimes quite hilarious.

Келесі