Music needs to be louder. I can still hear some of the dialog.

@iamshashigoud6592

Ай бұрын

This is exactly what I was thinking. LOL. :-D

@xmeo209

Ай бұрын

​@@iamshashigoud6592 I would consider that a boomer smiley (respectful)

@TheMouseHouse162

Ай бұрын

Facts

@ramonhernandez5653

Ай бұрын

😅😅😅😅

@nilanjansarker4575

Ай бұрын

😂😂😂

It's funny the first time this problem entered into my life was on Brooklyn 99. "Are you trying to Monte Hall me? Do I need to teach you eighth grade statistics?"

@alireza-fn1iw

Ай бұрын

I dont know, do I need to teach you seventh grade statistics?

@alienorkano8539

Ай бұрын

Booooonnnneee !!!!!!

@KiloBravoGaming

Ай бұрын

​@@alireza-fn1iwI don't know, do I have to teach you SIXTH grade statistics?

@kotaibamattar813

Ай бұрын

at the end the answer was " you needed to boon" 🤣🤣🤣🤣

@rosa_christian

Ай бұрын

FRR also ended in one of the funniest moments ever

The movie name is 21 if you didn't know

@itzgav725

12 күн бұрын

Thanks!

@ricardosd12

12 күн бұрын

It’s Godfather

@johnieday5186

11 күн бұрын

And its fantastic it’s a true story about card counting really worth the watch

@panqake4318

11 күн бұрын

​@@johnieday5186one of my favorite movies. Seen it so many times

@N-PTRS

10 күн бұрын

Thank you!

It should include the information that the host knows where the car is, and always opens a dummy then makes the offer to switch.

@jackhudson4510

8 күн бұрын

This is important, if the host didn't always have to reveal a goat door, he could simply open a goat door more frequently when there player selected the car to add more ambiguity to the situation. Like opening a goat door 50% when you select the car and only 30% when select a goat.

@inigocilveti3287

7 күн бұрын

This is the correct take. There was missing information in the original premise, therefore the protagonist either knew the problem and solution beforehand, or invented some information and got lucky, both of which make him look way less smart

@benjaminlanzotti1374

4 күн бұрын

He LITERALLY SAYS "the host knows where the car is." So...OBVIOUSLY he picks a goat door every time, since he didn't pick the car door he knows the location of and there is only one that has the car. 34 likes on yours...and two comments saying the same thing, with likes themselves. Humans are doomed.

@douglaszare1215

3 күн бұрын

@@benjaminlanzotti1374 You are wrong and manueldi2990 and others are right. The clip also says, "The host DECIDES to open another door." You are assuming that the host has no choice, and is required to open a door showing a goat. This added assumption, contradicting the clip, is one of the ones used in the standard argument for a 2/3 winning chance. Without adding this assumption to the version in this clip, the host might only offer a chance to switch when the person chooses the car. In the original show, the host sometimes didn't offer a chance to switch, and just showed that the first door hid a goat. Don't feel too bad, though. Most people who remember that switching is supposed to win 2/3 don't remember exactly why. People often give an incomplete and incorrect statement of the problem, then add assumptions when trying to justify the answer they remember but don't understand.

@benjaminlanzotti1374

3 күн бұрын

@@douglaszare1215 HE LITERALLY SAYS THE HOST KNOWS WHERE THE CAR IS

Fuck this dude, but he played a damn good cod villain

@vrstuff212

Ай бұрын

On skibidi

@ChaseShirley

Ай бұрын

Mr. Irons

@Kazakh_Airlines_Flight_1907

Ай бұрын

One of my fav villains in cod for me

@JustAnotherTwink

Ай бұрын

He was an incredible actor tbf, he’s just an absolute garbage human being.

@gIyph_

Ай бұрын

​@@Kazakh_Airlines_Flight_1907right behind *MENENDEZ*

“I’ll switch to door number 3. 100% chance of getting a goat”

@SourthernerPilgrim

27 күн бұрын

yeah man.. is the G O A T..

@jhjames9264

27 күн бұрын

😂

@aqplaysgames

25 күн бұрын

It's actually 33.33% for door no. 1

@LukeF2323

25 күн бұрын

@@aqplaysgames not if they show you the goats behind it right?🤣

@MrSeattleguy3098

25 күн бұрын

Awesome movie great story

A goat is an easy 75-200 bucks but goat milk is also worth a lot so do with that information what you will

@hisdudeness690

Күн бұрын

Exactly. Would you prefer to get a car and let it drink the fuel or get the goat and drink its milk.

You essentially trade places with the house. Let’s forget everything. At the start you had 33 percent chance. They had 66 percent chance. This move, you essentially traded places with them (eliminated one door and taken theirs). That’s why you now have 66 percent chance.

@-Wyvern-

15 сағат бұрын

Why isn’t it now a 50% chance??

@LightsHorror

15 сағат бұрын

@@-Wyvern- since the chances haven’t changed since you picked the first one mate. If they removed one before any choices then you’d be on 50/50. But essentially just remember it as in terms of the initial choice for this specific problem :).

@-Wyvern-

14 сағат бұрын

@@LightsHorror okay but it doesn’t make any sense… if your eliminating one then there’s two to pick from and that makes it a 50/50.. so if it were to instead be a 66 why would the one you already didn’t pick be the 66 and not the one you already have?

@connoresmondo

14 сағат бұрын

@@-Wyvern-bro asking the real questions

@nielsvandervliet617

11 сағат бұрын

@@-Wyvern- if you look at it from the other angle there is a 66% chance that you pick a goat. now if you picked a goat the host will always show the door of the other goat. which means that the switch will be the car. if you look at the statistics, if you would do the game show 3 or just multiple times. where you would chose a different door each time you would be on a car 33% of the time and a goat 66% of the time. if you now would apply this strategy of switching. the goat starts will always become a car by switching netting a 66% chance of winning

"Thank you for another 33.3 chance" "And the car was behind door number 1" "FUCK"

@JotaroKujo-fr7uo

25 күн бұрын

lol

@elvis3571

24 күн бұрын

@urakkam-kr5uq source please? for that large number of trials?

@zhengistasbolatov8480

23 күн бұрын

@urakkam-kr5uq Doesn't make sense to me. Isn't it 50/50 now? You have two options, chances can increase only depending on your assumption that the Host has your best interest in mind. So pretty much, after opening the first door you know that the car isn't there, and the host is kinda giving you a hint you chose the wrong one too, that could explain 66.7%. Or does it increase because he was actually given 2 chances and additional hint on the same task?

@giorgitsiklauri1283

23 күн бұрын

@@zhengistasbolatov8480 It's best not to think about which door has the car, but rather whether your current door has a car or goat. Your chance of picking the car in the first pick is 1/3, your chance of picking a goat on the first pick is 2/3, nothing about that chance changes after the reveal, there is still a 1/3 chance that your door has the car behind it, and a 2/3 chance it has a goat behind it, since there's only one other option it must have a 2/3 chance of a car and a 1/3 chance of a goat. Edit: Another way of thinking that often helps with certain types of statistics problems is increasing the number of variables. Say there's 100 doors, one has a car the others have goats, you pick one door, the host opens 98 doors, all with cars, now it's clearer that you should switch than in the original problem.

@saityusufbulur3366

23 күн бұрын

@@zhengistasbolatov8480 Without host opening a goat door, when you choose a goat door and change it there are 2 scenarios: You can come across car door and win or you can come across another goat door and lose. Host's behavior of opening a goat door everytime eliminates the second one and guarantees that when you choose goat door and change you'll 100% come across car door. This advantage is what increases your chance from 33% to 66%. There are two goat doors at first so, your chance of winning when you change is 2/3.

Can you turn up the music? I can almost hear what they're saying...

@fifugan_1798

29 күн бұрын

legit 💀

@Mitchpog

28 күн бұрын

Never heard of copyright?

@sidhurinku

28 күн бұрын

WHAT??? Can't hear you

@xjudoflip7381

28 күн бұрын

there are subtitles too bud. People are so bored, they bitch about anything. Look at me, 3 am in the morning, bitching about this guy, bitching about a song...

@stevederp9801

28 күн бұрын

I get what you’re saying. But unfortunately all of these channels have to do this otherwise these clips get taken down for copyright purposes. The dumbest thing is they it Hollywood actually was smart they would work with these channels and give them permission so that scenes like this could go viral and people would want to go back and watch those movies

Whoever recalled this riddle being in Brooklyn 9-9, you are awesome. 😁

Kevin spacey? You don't want any doors he's behind

Bro went from CEO of ATLAS to a math proffesor💀💀💀

@Decez1016

Ай бұрын

*Bro went from a maths professor to CEO of Atlas

@matthewchristeson6589

Ай бұрын

This is from the movie _21,_ which came out before _Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare._

@wyattorangeblock7644

Ай бұрын

No… you are just a child

@logictified

Ай бұрын

Then he went to President of the United States. (House of Cards)

@labibkhan9205

Ай бұрын

what a nice math teacher, i hope he doesn't blow up a golden bridge and bring warships

"Basic maths led Ben to win a brand new goat" Explanation: I'll explain Monty Hall solution quickly, since you choose one out of the three doors randomly you have 33% chance of guessing right and 67% of guessing wrong, after the host opens a goat door you would be left with a goat and a car which seems like a 50/50 chance BUT if you guessed right at first and switch you will lose, if you chose wrong at first and switch you will win, if you remember you have 33.33% of guessing right the first time and 66.67% of guessing wrong which means by switching you have betters odds.

@battlenetcs

Ай бұрын

😂

@stock_movie1875

Ай бұрын

His chances increased but were never 100

@UnfortunateLooking

Ай бұрын

I don't get it... How is it that he's more likely to win? Isn't it just 50-50. @@stock_movie1875

@user-zw7rq8ys9h

Ай бұрын

​@@stock_movie1875the bad thing is he didn't have a 66% chance either. Yeah when there were three doors it was 33.3%. But when it went to two doors it was a 50% chance. His odds didn't double because now there's two doors instead of three

@stock_movie1875

Ай бұрын

@@user-zw7rq8ys9h actually it does because the original 3rd door is there and now you know what is behind it making your chances of having guessed correctly proportionally higher.

To be clear, an important part about the monty hall problem is that the gameshow host will never choose to reveal the door with the car behind it. It's only then that switching doors nets you the probability of all the doors revealed.

@Quimoth

12 күн бұрын

If the gameshow host was able to pick the car door you would still switch, only to the door the host picked. How does this affect your initial chance of 1/3 to be right? lets say we have 5 doors. 1/5 that your door has the prize. 4/5 that your door does not. 1 door gets removed from the equation. so now 3 doors share the 4/5 probability. 4/5 = 12/15. 12/3=4, so 4/15 for each of those 3. the initial door still has 1/5 or 3/15 chance to be right. The host being wrong or right does not affect your odds, I fail to see how it is important.

@mattyfuture

12 күн бұрын

Nope. It's literally 50/50. Quit playing mind games. 1/2 is 50% no matter how much stupidity you insert in front of it. Trolls. Don't troll, it's a sin and hell is not eternal according to biblical experts

@zachariz1490

12 күн бұрын

@@Quimothit does affect your odds of getting it right and switching because you know you’re right. Statistics in that case imply that you don’t know the right answer. If I know the answer I can make it 100% to get it right

@EinSofQuester

11 күн бұрын

@@mattyfuture you are insane

@Quimoth

11 күн бұрын

@@zachariz1490 you throw a lot of words but fail to explain why picking 1/3 changes odds due to an event happening after that choice

I’m not very smart so can someone explain this to me. If you have three doors and it’s a 33.3% chance. But if one of the doors is open, doesn’t that increase it to a 50% chance?

@sherockow

7 күн бұрын

It's basically the idea that at some point in the game show if you switched doors your odds of having the car behind either of your selected doors was 66.67% because you chose two doors. It is just a stupid statistics question that has no bearing on the fact that the final guess between two doors will be a 50/50 shot.

@MeyerJ17

7 күн бұрын

@adamharper758: imagine there are 100 doors, with one car behind them and 99 goats. Now you Pick a door, you have 1 % Chance of hitting the car. Now someone opens 98 doors with goats and offers you to switch to the other door. Of course you switch, because your chosen door has 1 % Chance to be the car. The car is behind the other door 99 % You get the idea?

@marlynmunoz6102

7 күн бұрын

instead of 3 , lets make it 100 doors ur chosen door has a 1% chance of being the car door, making the rest of the doors have a 99 % chance of containg the car after the host opens 98 goat doors, ur chosen door would still have a 1% chance of being the car door and the remaining 1 closed door would have a 99% chance of containing the car, so switching means u have a 99% chance of picking the car door

@sherockow

7 күн бұрын

@@marlynmunoz6102 Yes you have 99% chance of picking the correct door at some point, if you get that far, but you don't win unless you pick correctly on the last one between the final two doors, which is a 50/50 shot...

@adamharper758

7 күн бұрын

@@MeyerJ17 thank you for the clarification. Your original answer is likely wrong because you only had a one percent chance of success. So in the situation, the other door is most likely the correct door🫡

The classic "Monty Haul" problem - yes his answer is correct, you should switch your choice.

@ItIsJan

Ай бұрын

id argue that if im asked wheter i want to switch or not, yeah, if i pick switch, the choice is a 50% chance of being correct - but not switching is a choice aswell, which also has a 50% chance. hence both options are, atleast stastically, equally valuable, no? EDIT: this is actually completely wrong, as the original author of the comment said. Pleae stop correcting me, thanks

@waltlock8805

Ай бұрын

@@ItIsJan No. Think of it expanded - Ten doors. You pick one, he then opens eight with goats and asks if you want to switch. The odds are you didn't guess right the first time. The same applies: 2 out of 3 times, the prize will be in one of the boxes you didn't choose - so switching is the best option.

@ItIsJan

Ай бұрын

@@waltlock8805 ooh yeah now it makes sense, thinking about it with a larger quantity made it click.. you picked the bad door at first and switch -> you get the good door you picked to good door at first and switch -> you get the bad door the chance to get the bad door in the beginning is 2/3, getting the good one is 1/3, hence switching is the better option, you are right!

@jinxedproduction

Ай бұрын

​@@ItIsJanfrom what i understood is that you have 66% chance at guessing right (because you know not to choose Door 3 and then choice between Door 1 and 2 is 33% as well). I however dont understand why Switching your choice from Door 1 to Door 2 is gonna change anything.

@axelord4ever

Ай бұрын

It makes sense if the door picked to be opened early was _not_ done at random. The bigger issue of the Monty Hall Problem is that there are assumptions that must be made, which are not stated openly (and thus not reducible to a pure mathematical abstract). The host must always open a door with a goat, and it can't be the one the player chose, and there must be linearity between the picks. It's counterintuitive because the outcome space then has four solutions, two of which lead to winning the car, and two to losing. _If_ the assumptions above hold true, however, then the probability of each of those solutions become unequal (for 1/6, 1/6, 1/3, 1/3, lose-lose-win-win respectively).

"But that's just statistics." "Never put a 'but' in front of statistics."

@johneaston8314

Ай бұрын

I always disagreed with this scene. The stats are obviously correct but if the host know where the prize is the game changes. It's not chance it's chess

@cyborggaming161

Ай бұрын

Jaden Williams fan I see

@MrT------5743

Ай бұрын

​@johneaston8314 if the host knows where the car is and only offers the switch to the contestant when they originally picked the car is chess, if he offers it always, you are definitely more likely to win the car if you always switch.

@johneaston8314

Ай бұрын

@@MrT------5743 You're still only referring to the probability. The issue with that equation is you're only allowing one metric as input. If the host knows where the car is you're going to be looking for tells to see if he's lying, if he's hiding something, etc. It's a polynomial regression problem

@Pefiye

Ай бұрын

*earthquake But that's just statistic?

Careful kid. He gave you that arm. He gave you a second chance

Chuck was serious not realizing Shaq is a whole kid

No way the dude from Advanced Warfare became a college professor 😭😭 Edit: I’m not usually one to do edits on comments but holy shit, thanks for 5.7k likes one 1 DAY!

@Papa_Slim

Ай бұрын

He really turned his life around man, we all deserve a second shot And bro was that campaign not absolutely amazing??

@Jaden_Alvarez

Ай бұрын

For someone that owns his own military I feel like he would’ve been that before

@Ghost-kv3vj

Ай бұрын

@@Jaden_Alvarezhave you been playing war thunder lately if not the snail is not happy

@Jaden_Alvarez

Ай бұрын

@@Ghost-kv3vj I’ve been playing wt everyday for the past 3 years

@Perot09

Ай бұрын

@@Papa_Slimfr top ten imo loved it, matter of fact, im gonna go reinstall it bc of this comment, thanks man

The movie is called "21" by the way. It's based on a true story about a group of college math majors and their professor who created a group who goes to Las Vegas to cheat at Black Jack for a lucrative amount of money. Edit: ALRIGHT! I GET IT! Counting cards isn't TECHNICALLY cheating! Jesus Mary and Joseph, you all act like you're the first people to correct me! I appreciate the likes, but goddamn people, read the replies before you think you're the first person and all of human history to correct me!

@PolishChessPlayer

Ай бұрын

They have never "cheated" -_-

@forge4119

Ай бұрын

@@PolishChessPlayer Legally no, but counting cards is technically cheating. At least enough for them to ask you to leave.

@PolishChessPlayer

Ай бұрын

@@forge4119 how using brain is "cheating"? Casinos are the ones who offer winning game.

@connortheandroidsentbycybe7740

Ай бұрын

​@@forge4119 It's what the casinos do. Also, you don't necessarily get kicked for counting. You get kicked for winning

@dustinwilliams2970

Ай бұрын

Not “cheating” if you learn how to play the game better than the casino can. You keep track of the high cards in comparison to the low cards. If there’s a substantial difference, you bet more money. But then you gotta know basic strategy, deviations, when to raise your bet, etc. it’s not easy

So loud music!! Can’t even hear clearly what they’re talking aboutt

This is really great, I like it very much

I like that they introduce the Monty Hall problem in a high level university class as if this is 8th grade.

@mattiamarchese6316

19 күн бұрын

In American movies you can seem very smart without saying anything that a 14 years old wouldn't understand.

@SeraphsWitness

19 күн бұрын

@@mattiamarchese6316 That's really not a uniquely American movie thing. It just so happens that America makes the plurality of popular movies in the world.

@mattiamarchese6316

19 күн бұрын

@@SeraphsWitness yes, still the film is set in the USA.

@cankoroglu1908

15 күн бұрын

maybe its for 8th graders now but it wasnt at the time when it's first came up. many people didnt answer it as "i would switch the door". only 13% of them did actually. the pool included some mathematicians and physicists etc.

@SeraphsWitness

15 күн бұрын

@@cankoroglu1908 by the time this movie came out, it wasn't an area of confusion anymore. That's my point.

"What you're seeing here, is Advanced Knowledge" -Irons

@lilbolo9215

Ай бұрын

Underrated asf comment

@aryangupta6186

29 күн бұрын

bayes theorem

@alienhead1184

27 күн бұрын

Technical it’s wrong and right

Spacey such an amazing actor man.

Spacey is an incredible actor fr

It’s easier understood if you increase the number of doors. For our example lets say there’s 1000 doors and only 1 winning door. You choose one at random that has a 1/1000 chance of being the winning door. The host then opens 998 losing doors and leaves one door closed and offers for you to switch. Think about it. Is it more likely that you chose the only winning door out of a 1000 - right off the bat, or would the only remaining door have a better chance? When you first made your choice, the chance of picking the correct door was 1/1000. After the host reveals the 998 losing doors, the probability of your chosen door being correct remains at 1/1000, while the probability of the unopened door being correct increases to 999/1000. So, switching doors gives you a higher chance of winning, 999/1000 versus 1/1000. --- Edit: There’s been some resistance and confusion around this. A lot of it comes from the assumption that it should instead be 50/50 then Because why wouldn’t it be right? two doors! The thing is, there’s a bias/weight to one option over the other, and it’s caused by our first choice. (I’ll be going over it in my other perspective below) That’s what makes it not 50/50 I wanted to give another perspective that should make it even clearer why that isn’t the case. Here’s my preferred follow-up explanation that feels most direct with why swapping is better Let’s go with 1,000 doors for this example too The first event, the choice, effectively creates two groups. Group A: Only your chosen door. 0.1% chance of containing the car door Group B: Every door you did NOT choose. 99.9% chance of containing the car door. Eliminating the goat doors from Group B would not change whether or not the car door was in Group B after our first choice And if it is in Group B, the car door has to be the last door standing, mandatorily, since all the wrong doors are eliminated. Now our second decision comes in. The decision effectively has us bet whether the car door was in our first choice by staying (Group A) [0.1%], or bet that it was not in our first choice by swapping (Group B) [99.9%]

@torben7114

Ай бұрын

That's the easiest explaination I ever heard about this problem

@dapperoreo5224

Ай бұрын

This is the best explanation I've heard yet

@laboot7447

Ай бұрын

If you still dont understand, think about it like this: In the 999/1000 scenarios you chose the goat, the only other door the gameshow would leave is the one with a car. So 999 times out of 1000 you'd want to switch.

@Ridwanali88

Ай бұрын

Thank you I couldn’t understand how they got the percentage 66 but now I understand

@cloakeddemon3207

Ай бұрын

Sorry if I am being stupid but why wouldn’t the choice change to 50/50 because now there are 2 doors? Edit: nvm I finally understand it

He solved the riddle and the teacher felt him up after class.

@flyntflossy3044

8 күн бұрын

🤣

@zendoclone1

8 күн бұрын

He was acquitted on all charges bud. Never happened.

@nathanaeldavid6238

8 күн бұрын

Gayyyy!

@nathanaeldavid6238

8 күн бұрын

@@zendoclone1it happened to you and you like it.

@TheFish711

8 күн бұрын

@@zendoclone1He’s from an industry which has the main purpose of lying for profit. Not to mention he is very wealthy. An acquittal means little

Great stuff I’ve learned something new today!

Teacher looks like the dude from call of duty

This movie has one of my all-time favorite quotes that goes for daily life as well. "Always account for variable change."

@kaniizzzkaa

Ай бұрын

pls tell what's the name of the movie

@Raltaw1

Ай бұрын

@@kaniizzzkaaits called 21.

@huzaifakabul7574

Ай бұрын

What is the name of the movie?

@johnlloydjumamil807

Ай бұрын

​@@huzaifakabul7574its 21 its all about blackjack winner winner chicken dinner

@johnh.5759

Ай бұрын

@@huzaifakabul7574it’s called 21.

A real business man would take the goat

@Forsaken246

28 күн бұрын

Fr, make goat cheese

@Lusk7741

28 күн бұрын

As a "real businessman", no the fuck I would not. It would make more sense to take the car, sell it, and buy 100 goats. You'd probably still have enough left over to cover a few years of feed and the medical expenses.

@Pika-sp9cs

27 күн бұрын

Maybe if you're from Wales

@Klayton_Nivel

27 күн бұрын

​@@Lusk7741give a man a car and he will eat for a day, teach him how to goat and he will car for the rest of his life

@EpicKiller152

27 күн бұрын

Give a man a car, and he shall take the burden of taxes from the IRS. Give a man a goat, and he only bears the expenses if he so chooses to spare the costs on the goat.

The video production is great

The Monty Hall problem - classic ❤️

"What you're seeing is advanced warfare."

@randomguy6328

19 күн бұрын

Cod aw moment Anyone knows when they will release AW part2?

@user-nr9cb8di3h

19 күн бұрын

🗣️🔥

@virrebooi93

19 күн бұрын

You're*

@amirdashti

17 күн бұрын

Good reference

@luckygamesluke942

17 күн бұрын

Dude I searched through the comments hoping someone would see him from cod aw

"so sorry sir it was door number one!"

@StorytimeAdventures03

29 күн бұрын

It was?

@bjobers

29 күн бұрын

@@StorytimeAdventures03 he was j joking

@PembuatKomentarHandal

29 күн бұрын

​@@StorytimeAdventures03 Always Has been

@ReditReel

29 күн бұрын

always door num 1

Somebody is thinking about buying a bunch of lottery tickets. 😂😂

🤔All that goes down the drain if the car was really behind door number 1 🤷🏽‍♂️

@Yamyatos

5 күн бұрын

None of this goes down the drain. You still have a higher chance by switching. You can be unlucky with a 67% chance, and you can be unlucky with a 33% chance. The latter is just more likely. You cant guarantee to get the car.

the movie is called 21

@dagurtheman5932

Ай бұрын

All these people trying to explain the Monty Hall problem and here you are the true one, the goat giving us the answer we want. Thank you. ❤

@ThatOneSailingKid

Ай бұрын

Whats 9 + 10?

@seanmcmanus9656

Ай бұрын

​@@ThatOneSailingKidthe movie

@ThatOneSailingKid

Ай бұрын

@@seanmcmanus9656 it was a joke bro

@EricFromm-vi9zb

Ай бұрын

@@ThatOneSailingKid21

Please shut this damn song off 😂😂😂😂

@akmi1931

Ай бұрын

They can’t. It’s to get by the copyright censors

@nol2521

Ай бұрын

@@akmi1931oh shiit so that’s why they keep blasting this particular song?

@roberttaylor5997

Ай бұрын

You can turn it off yourself by clicking the loudspeaker icon.

One of the most underrated movies!!

@gokul123_89

8 күн бұрын

Name of the movie

The video was taken very well

For anyone confused. In an event where no switching is allowed you have a flat 1/3 chance to win. This is static and set in stone as there is always two goats and always one car. Then when switching is introduced two events emerge: A) you picked the 1/3 chance to find the car. Switching would then make you lose B) you picked the 2/3 chance to find a goat. Switching then gives you the win. Ignore the fact that there are 2 doors at the end of the problem. The probability of the guess gets locking in once you first choose a door. And since you know your odds are 1/3 of winning and 2/3 of losing, it means that statistically you’re more likely to win by switching, as all switching does is flip both odds around. Ie, your 1/3 odds of guessing the car become a 1/3 odds of losing it in a switch, and your 2/3 odds of not getting the car become a 2/3 odds of winning it

@Dazai_200

Ай бұрын

True hero

@muse5722

Ай бұрын

Probability doesn't lock in

@icefire6622

Ай бұрын

​@@muse5722It "locks in" once the gameshow host alters the problem by opening a door. That action is dependent on the choice you make initially, and it does "lock in" that probably

@goopguy548

Ай бұрын

only issue I have with this is it doesn't change anything, whether you answer is changed or not you the statistics aren't locked in

@AEyob21

Ай бұрын

The odds increase both ways with 1/3 if one is eliminated from the choice regardless of your choice. Giving you equal odds. I don't see this theory making sense

Holt and Kevin having a field day with this movie

@HueghMungus

Ай бұрын

Movie name you somuvabeetch 😂😂 tell me

I love the movie "21" so much. It doesn't only show the effects of gambling to the mind which makes humans rely on emotion, which the house manipulates. But the house can also be manipulated too through thorough yet simple calculations and cunning deceit.

Movie name: 21 (2008)

@Bradley-rq2mp

Ай бұрын

Thank you 😊😊

@IanJenn356094

Ай бұрын

Based on true events, but they white washed the entire cast. They were Asian, not white

@OGS2099

Ай бұрын

An exact ripoff of a Canadian movie called: The Last Casino (2004) Exact ripoff.

@Rafael_ivaniof

Ай бұрын

@@Bradley-rq2mp 🤍

@Rafael_ivaniof

Ай бұрын

@@OGS2099 oh that's interesting I should probably watch it 😃

Im fairly sure the professor is the CEO of a powerful private military company

@lericebowl

Ай бұрын

That has some secret intentions

@Account-id8yo

Ай бұрын

Called Atlas

@Bltz25

Ай бұрын

That destroyed my arm in torture saying he “gave me that arm” that “second chance”

@oddyo7453

Ай бұрын

Yeah, he definitely is a evil mastermind who will stop at nothing to advance warfare for his own gain

After 5 minutes of my head exploding i think i finally understand the math behind this lol

I love the comments. Reminds me why math is a core subject. Not because you need it, but because it's how you find people who can handle more complex abstract problems.

@adrianzoto6435

20 күн бұрын

Biggest BS ever. This is exactly what school told us. Keep following their agenda 👍🏼 thank god I can find the slope of something that I will never need to do in life but I had to learn taxes on my own and how interest rates work. Useless curriculum and even more useless of a comment because if you have no interest in the subject you aren’t gaining anything from it anyways

@imanoldurango8213

20 күн бұрын

⁠@@adrianzoto6435useless if you never use it. You’re obviously not an engineer or an architecture or a physicist. You’re probably a fast food worker.

@imanoldurango8213

20 күн бұрын

@@adrianzoto6435you don’t need to find the slope of something because you’re never doing anything that requires it. Basically you’re doing menial work

@adrianzoto6435

19 күн бұрын

@@imanoldurango8213 I do IT but let’s just assume things. Moron

@jobo2243

19 күн бұрын

​@@imanoldurango8213lmao there are jobs that don't require any real understanding of mathematics that aren't fast food worker. So either you are actually an idiot or he hit a nerve with his comment probably because you pride yourself on your mathematical ability and are severely lacking in other more practical areas. Essentially it's your was of battling your insecurity by pretending you are better or are of more value than the next person when in reality if you understand the world you know that's not true. No most people (including plenty of architects engineers and physicists) dont need to find the slope of something (including manually) because we now have machines that can do everything you could do and more except 10 million times better and faster than you or any human ever could. Soon enough all of my and your knowledge and expirence in these types of fields will amount to nothing except creative and unorthodox input as I could teach a child to perform a pattern on a computer to preform and solve equations in seconds that would take you minutes or hours. Soon your mind will be irrelevant or should I say more irrelevant than it already is and you'll actually have to pretend you're superior based on something that can't be done and learned by a child with a computer. That's the problem I came across with all these STEM people I've met in classes you are all so egocentric and insecure that you need to cling onto the idea that because you are in a certain field you are better. There are fields that are just as difficult if not far more difficult to understand get a grasp of and preform in real life that you wouldn't be able to do but because we're going to a nice school and we are in "hard" classes we are the best? Give me a break. This is why we are all so limited and dumb overall there are important things to learn outside of various math and science classes as well.

"You're a mathematician Harry"😂😂😂

@LoneReaper115

29 күн бұрын

"You're a mathmagician Harry"

It seems like Irons bounced back as a science teacher after his deadly fall at the Atlas compound.

Explanation: There is 3 doors 1,2,3 First, He chose door no 1 after the host opens door no 3 where the goat is then the host reoffers to chose between door no 1 and no 2 since the door no 1 is already chosen the only door left is door no 2 so he chose door no 2 as well which means he chose the door with car because door no 3 is goat suppose door no 1 is also a goat then the right answer is door no 2 or vice verca hence he would chose the door with car no matter

21 is one of my all time favorite movies.

@its80s50

27 күн бұрын

thank i get clowned all the time for this literally is one of my favorites as well i rewatch it all the time

@hashblack11

25 күн бұрын

10+9

@CentristDad155

25 күн бұрын

The student's prize for getting the question right is to be groped by the teacher

@shift00941

23 күн бұрын

whats the name of it?

@arastoonet

23 күн бұрын

​@@shift0094121 (2008)

Movie: 21 It’s a super underrated movie and one of my favorites

@Maggdusa

29 күн бұрын

I'm going to watch it because of this comment. 🙂

@tijmenberends242

29 күн бұрын

You will not be disappointed ​@@Maggdusa

@josueamaya3390

28 күн бұрын

@@Maggdusaamazing movie, you gonna enjoy it

@nameless9462

28 күн бұрын

aight imma watch

@earthkung1218

28 күн бұрын

9 + 10?

This movie is amazing imo

This guy makes Monty Hall paradox sound like frickin nuclear physics

“Ben, I need you to meet me in my office after class”

@ruipedrowasindisneyland

28 күн бұрын

oh hell nah

@RIMURUxTEMPEST0

26 күн бұрын

Prof, gonna open Ben's doors

@JC-tg1gf

24 күн бұрын

hehe

@nmgkid

23 күн бұрын

thats literally how the movie goes lol

@ardiarafahmi560

21 күн бұрын

Someone enlighten me pls.

My AP stats teacher showed us this movie… I cannot forget this scene

@futaro3883

Ай бұрын

what's the name

@saturnzbarz1827

Ай бұрын

@@futaro3883 21

@MaxVerstappenGlazer

Ай бұрын

21

If you chose 3 and he opened door 1 and revealed a goat this means that door 1 was chosen specifically to remove a goat from the equation, not to show you that you are correct. This also means that door 2 could have been intentionally not shown because it has the car. Whereas 3 wasnt shown because you picked #3. 3 wasn’t revealed initially because it is the door you chose, not because it potentially could have the car behind it; door 2 has one more reason it is more likely to have the car than does door 3 and that’s where the % comes from.

Make the music louder next time please; and please keep it the same

*opens door #1* you missed the chance to have a car

@Ironiclobster69

25 күн бұрын

Yes that happens 33.3% of the time

@iKiLLeRXD123

25 күн бұрын

@@Ironiclobster69I see what u did there xd

@budgetarms

23 күн бұрын

@@Ironiclobster69 and yet, it became 50%

@NotSorryBaby

23 күн бұрын

@@budgetarms no it didn't how are you this confident about something u are objectively wrong

@budgetarms

23 күн бұрын

​@@NotSorryBaby Yeah, true, but I don't see it any differently from having 1M doors and then he opens all but 2. He says "this is your door, do you want to change it or not", even somehow it's a 50/50, while it's the same result. Edit: I have risen far beyond and have accepted my ignorance I had many moons ago

One thing I’ve never understood is that staying with the same door is also a choice. When you originally picked it you had a 33.33% chance of being right, but if you choose not to switch you’re still picking from the two remaining doors, so wouldn’t the new odds be the same regardless of what you pick

@PandaFan2443

29 күн бұрын

Its because they didn't recite the question correctly. When the host reveals the goat behind the door, the host MUST ALWAYS reveal a goat behind the door and do so intentionally. If the host just randomly chooses a door, regardless if it has a goat or not, then it doesn't matter if you switch. If the host intentionally chooses a goat every time, it matters if you switch.

@HeinrichDerGrosse1298

29 күн бұрын

You just have to think about it as that there are 3 possible scenarios It could be 🏎️🐐🐐 Or 🐐🏎️🐐 Or 🐐🐐🏎️ So let’s say you pick door number 1 and then the game host opens one of the other 2 doors with a goat behind it Then, in 2 of 3 cases, you get the car when you switch And in only 1 case you shouldn’t switch So there you get the 66,7% chance of getting the car when you switch (The same obviously happens when you choose door number 2 or 3) If you still didn’t understand: Imagine you get the same game show construct but with 100 doors So there are 99 goats and one car Now you chose one random door (the possibility of the car being behind that door is 1%) Then the game host opens 98 of the other doors with goats behind them So the car will most likely be within the 99 doors you didn’t chose And since in 98 of them were goats, there is a 99% chance that the car is behind the door that is left and only a 1% chance that the car is behind the door you choose at the beginning I probably didn’t explain that very well but English is also not my first language

@forestthefish

29 күн бұрын

​@@PandaFan2443 you explained it in a way that finally made sense to me so thank you

@nadimnaouach5839

29 күн бұрын

​@@HeinrichDerGrosse1298 Nah bro you did pretty good

@firekill24ohara10

29 күн бұрын

@@HeinrichDerGrosse1298 this actually makes sense for once

Make the music louder! The conversation is very distracting! /s

What does it(game show thing) have to do with what student told in the beginning of the video?

@brianb8003

7 күн бұрын

While the problem is quite old, or was made famous on a show called "Let's Make a Deal" with gameshow host Monty Hall. That's why this is referred to as the Monty Hall Problem (or Monty Hall Paradox). And that was the literal contrast. Ie: A car, or a goat, was hidden behind the doors. But mathematically speaking it's been around for hundreds of years as a theorem.

@pyrobryan

Күн бұрын

It's a conditional probability problem. Maybe that's what they were discussing? I can't remember. It's been a long time since I've seen the movie.

My favorite part of the movie is when the song plays. I get super pumped when the cellos start.

Make the music louder. I can still hear the dialog

@VAIBHAV_1_0

22 күн бұрын

Copy past for likes

@ricco3

21 күн бұрын

It’s perfect though

@roberttaylor7940

21 күн бұрын

Dialogue*

@LeviTun

21 күн бұрын

Stolen

@Hime-Time

20 күн бұрын

Dialogue💀

Please put this background song out of its misery

How many of doesn't understand for the first time but liked this video 😅

whats the CEO and owner of Atlas doing in a college as a professor 😭

@mitchellroberts398

Ай бұрын

I fkn hate, the atlas corporation 💀

@user-ft4fo9ze3w

Ай бұрын

what is the movie or tv-series you talking about ?

@junjun8855

Ай бұрын

​@@user-ft4fo9ze3wit's from the game call is duty advanced warfare and the main villain owns a company called Atlas 😭

Easy way to explain this. There's 3 scenarios: 1- Goat 2- Goat 3- Car 1- Goat 2- Car 3- Goat 1- Car 2- Goat 3- Goat Assuming you start with 1 always and that the host reveals a door other than yours that has a goat, switching will let you win 2 out of these 3 scenarios.

@traviso7810

17 күн бұрын

Same as not switching. Right? Like in his example if he opens door 3 and you chose 1. There is a 50 50 chance at the point you ate making the new choice. To me it seems like a new chance of 50% once you are offered a new choice. It's not the same choice anymore so it is just a 1/2 as 1 out of 2 options have the prize.

@maxwellhubbard2749

17 күн бұрын

But you have a higher chance of getting a car if you switch. Because you atent guaranteed scenario 3. Its between 1, 2 or 3. So you have a higher odds to get a car since 2 out of the 3 scenarios would give you the car. ​@traviso7810

@iteachlit

17 күн бұрын

@@maxwellhubbard2749 Scenario 1 is off the table impossible once the host opens door #3; how is that scenario still included? In order to justify switching, we aren’t looking for the scenario in which a goat is behind door #1 (which would be 2/3 if you include the now-defunct scenario)), but one in which the car is behind door #2.

@ronnielight4102

17 күн бұрын

This makes my brain hurt

@muhammadfahrimuharram74

17 күн бұрын

​@@iteachlit okay so scenario 1, 2, and 3 (the initial guess and the actual car placements) are all equally likely. however, the host is not constrained to only opening door #3, in scenario 1 the host will open door #2, while in scenario 2 the host will open door #3, and lastly in scenario #3 the host can chose either. so the first scenario is justified, and since all 3 scenarios are equally likely you have 2/3 as your odds of winning if you switch. another example, lets supposed there are 100 doors instead with a single car. you chose door #1 and with that you have 1/100 odds of getting it right, the host opens 98 other doors that isnt the car, your odds is now 99/100 since probability always adds up to 1. im sure you can understand that in no world the first door is a 50/50

_Ah yes, good ol' Steiner math._

What other people don't get is at the very start you have a 67% chance of picking the goat, and a 33% chance of picking the car There's a higher chance you initially pick the goat thus swapping makes more sense as it would lead you to the car

@user-sm3ii5dk1u

6 күн бұрын

Your odds only change from 1/3 to 1/2, you can never get an advantage in picking between 2 options, no matter what the tall foreheads here try to preach.

@mmm-or4zf

6 күн бұрын

@@user-sm3ii5dk1u You just don't get the point. At the very start there's a 2/3 chance you pick the goat. It's more likely for you to miss the car and pick the goat. If you pick the goat and swap doors you then get the car. That is why the there's a higher chance of winning with swapping doors. Also in simulations over and over again swapping had a higher percentage of winning

Fun Fact: this was in fact a game show called ‘Lets Make A Deal’. I believe the show was forced to shut down due to people figuring out this problem called ‘The Monty Hall Problem’. I did this for a my Math Night project in school and got a full grade because the judge couldn’t understand my problem yet when she looked it up it was true.

@ingiford175

Ай бұрын

The host was named Monty Hall....

@HeartThief21

Ай бұрын

I’ll take “Shit that Didn’t Happen” for $600.

@ingiford175

Ай бұрын

@@HeartThief21 That is Jeopardy, not Lets make a deal.

@evankraabel5415

Ай бұрын

Afaik, Lets make a deal rarely, if ever, offered this exact situation, so thats definitely not why the show ended.

@davidrahrer

Ай бұрын

Perhaps the original version. The revamped version started in 2009 with Wayne Brady and is still running. I remember the original from when I stayed home from school in the 60s.

For anyone confused, read this: the number of potential outcomes is 9 with 6 out of 9 potential ways to win the car. You only have 3 possible combinations of options to choose from at the beginning: 1. Car behind door 1. In this scenario, if you pick door 1 and switch, you lose. If you pick door 2 or 3 and switch, you win. 2. Car behind door 2. If you pick door 2 and switch, you lose. If you pick door 1 or 3 and switch, you win. 3. Car behind door 3. You pick door 3 and switch, you lose. You pick door 1 or 2 and switch, you win. 9 total possible scenarios with 6 out of 9 chances to win, AKA 2/3rds AKA 66.7% probability to win. Because the host always has to do the same thing every time, if you also do the same thing every time, your probability of winning will become fixed and mathematically predictable. If both you and the host lose the burden of choice, you gain the ability to predict the future based on all possible variants of the same simulation. It's a simple matter of statistics and mathematics. Stop thinking of each choice as independent. By removing the element of agency and replacing it with the predictability of standardized programming (AKA don't think like a human, think like a computer), you can now predict the future based on probability alone.

@BoopSnoot

Ай бұрын

This is what happens in colleges, children are brain-washed into thinking in a certain way and abandoning common sense. There are three doors, and the host is only going to reveal a door that the contestant has NOT chosen and that does not contain the car. Based on this fact, the choice is reset and there is an equal 50% chance that the car will be behind either door, and you do not increase your chances of picking the winning car by changing your choice to door 3. This type of overanalytical thinking is how they can convince otherwise intelligent students that gender is subjective and not ingrained in DNA.

@joelmacinnes2391

Ай бұрын

This isn't going to make anyone less confused 😅 Simply put there's a 1/3 chance you're right and a 2/3 chance you're wrong, once there's only two doors left there's a 1/3 chance you were right to begin with, and a 2/3, chance that the other door is the right one (It makes more sense on a bigger scale, if there were 99 wrong doors and he opened 98 of them, there's a 1% chance you were right before, and a 99% chance the other one is right) Edit: having read more closely your explanation does make perfect sense, at first it just looked like a lot of jargon

@BoopSnoot

Ай бұрын

@@joelmacinnes2391 When there are only two doors, knowing that a goat will always be chosen BECAUSE IT IS NOT A RANDOM EXPERIMENT AS THE MATH EXAMPLE DICTATES, its a 50/50 chance of being a goat or car. There is no advantage to switching because IT IS NOT A RANDOM EXPERIMENT you will ALWAYS BE SHOWN THE GOAT.

@illegalcumtrader56

Ай бұрын

It doesnt matter if you switch or not

@ThisIsCrowHead

Ай бұрын

I am confused... Cos I don't understand what it has to do with Newton?

what's kind of cool is that i read about this already in the curious incident of the dog in the night-time

Really good movie

Why does the teacher look like a gta character

@sylvesterstillalone1

24 күн бұрын

Looks a bit like Michael doesn't he?

@radanv2535

24 күн бұрын

Yeah, Kevin Spacey played GTA and had his face done? Possibly?

Thank you Marilyn Vos Savant for solving this riddle decades ago and enduring years of ridicule from a plethora of men in mathematics who took years to understand that she was right and they were wrong. Marilyn is still the modern G.O.A.T. of mathematics.

@kerr354

Ай бұрын

The monty hall problem is equivalent to the older three prisoners problem, which are functionally just the old bertrand box paradox, which was described and solved by Bertrand Russel in the 19th century, almost 200 years before her answer. What Marylin V. Savant did wasnt too spectacular, she correctly responded to a problem which can be solved just carefully applying the high school level math, but many men still felt like they had to prove her wrong instead of having the humility to inquire on how she reached her conclusion and explain it to them. Now imagine how much of an up hill battle academically succesful woman like Marie Curie or Emmy Noether had to climb. Not only for getting themselves recognized, but to also shift the paradigm of their fields entirely through their contributions.

@Rendelwood

29 күн бұрын

This response should have more likes. The dumb thing is that initially people like the professor portrayed in the clip though she was wrong.

The host cannot open either your door, or the door with the car. All possibilities and outcomes after you choose door 1: Car is behind 1 - host opens one of the other doors to reveal a goat, if you switch you get the other goat and lose. Car is behind 2 - host is forced to open door 3 to reveal a goat, if you switch you get the car. Car is behind 3 - host is foced to open door 2 to reveal a goat, if you switch you get the car. The only way you lose by switching is if you selected the car in the first place which is a 1/3 chance. Therefore you have a 2/3 chance by switching.

Funny but my profesor give almost the same example during some probability course this morning

One sentence that'll clear this all up. The host will never open the door with the car behind it

Nah cus bro went from a villain on call of duty to a frickin professor

I built this problem into a simulation. Proven.

Actually that is pretty good logic.

Why is the math not making sense to me .....when you eliminate the the third door statistically you will have 50% chance

@kaddeewrong5176

20 күн бұрын

Same I have no clue

@rahulauradkar3714

19 күн бұрын

Yeah thats what I thought as well

@firstlast1380

19 күн бұрын

There’s a 1/3 chance that you’ll choose the car and then switch to a goat and lose. Of the 3 doors, 2 are goats, 1 is a car. And you have to have had the car in order to make a losing switch in the first place. This is where the 1/3 chance comes from. There’s a 2/3 chance you’ll have chosen a goat and switch to the car for a win. Applying the same logic, you have to have had the goat in the first place in order to have had the possibility of a car winning switch. Since there’s 2 doors with goats, 2/3 chance of this being a scenario. If one door is revealed to have a goat behind it, that doesn’t remove it from the equation. You are still in the 2/3 (more likely) possibility range of having chosen a goat in the first place. With one goat revealed, switching your answer at that moment is why it’s now a %66.7 chance at winning the car. It’s statistically more likely that you’d have chosen a goat beforehand, thus you switching and one goat being revealed, you’ve used up both pieces of that 2/3 possibility to switch to a car. At least statistically.

@humanoid60

19 күн бұрын

This is explained poorly in the video, but it depends on the game you are playing. The assumption is that the host will reveal a random door that you did not pick that is a goat. That means that there is a lower chance that you chose the car, because if you chose the car, then the host could have chosen the 2nd or 3rd door, but if you chose the goat, the host can only choose the 3rd door. If instead, the assumption is that the host will reveal the "rightmost door with a goat," then you will have a 50% chance of getting a car. It's a similar line of reasoning as Flip a coin. If it is heads, I will always say "apple." If it is tails, I will say apple or banana with 50% probability. If I said apple, what is the probability that the coin is heads?

@99agility34

19 күн бұрын

@@humanoid60thank you, this is the most clear explanation I’ve found.

The movies called 21 for anyone interested

@brawlzone7649

Ай бұрын

Thanks man

@lakshya1695

Ай бұрын

Thankjs!

@naufalism19

Ай бұрын

The movie is good tho.. great ending

@JustcallmeToyo

Ай бұрын

Thank you

Video: **Explains** Me at end: Ok so... what?

No now you have 49.99% chance of having a goat in both of the doors

After spending 20 minutes, I understood the solution. The key is, no matter whatever we pick, the host opens a door with a goat behind. Suppose there are 3 doors - 1,2,3. Let's assume we pick Door 3. Now the host will open Door 1/2. He gives us a chance to switch. Possibility 1: the car was behind Door 3 itself. Host will open Door 1/2. Switching to 2/1 will LOSE the car. Possibility 2: the car was behind Door 2. Host can only open Door 1 since Door 3 is what we have selected. Switching to 2 will WIN the car. Possibility 3: the car was behind Door 1. Host can only open Door 2. Here switching will again WIN the car. So, out of 3 possibiliies, Switching will WIN the car twice. Hence 2/3 or 66.67% probability. This is an example of Monty Hall problem.

@KargolRaj

Ай бұрын

So many people getting confused here is coz they don't know that the house only opens the door that holds a goat .

@DivyarajMoolya

Ай бұрын

This is only applicable when he already haven't opened the door or picked any specific door number to open, If he has already opened a door it 50% probability that any remaining door has car

@rohes8129

Ай бұрын

May ALLAH grant you success and guide you in your life U see i have searched before when i saw this movie but couldn't find any reasonable answer and i thought they were really stupid but now i know thanks to you and everything makes sense... All love and respect and i will call you sir eventhough i haven't called any one that before🌹🌹🌹

@rohes8129

Ай бұрын

​@@DivyarajMoolya wtf I came back to square one!!! He already opened the door and that idiot is saying its 66...and 33.... and all over the internet they are saying the same thing... But i didn't care they didn't make any sense but this comment made perfect sense... If you know what you are talking about i hope you will prove it just like lambodar7 did.

@addicts666

Ай бұрын

If he opens door 3 you got 33.3 of the equation that is now known..... Considering you would chose door 1, knowing 3... 1+3 would be 66.7% upon your logic.... Okay... then you decide to switch to door #2, it has its 33.3, door 3 its 33.3 known as well... so you got 66.7 with door 2 as well? Option 1 + option 2 = 133% probability? The introduction of the 3rd door being known removes and unknown variable from the equation.... its not 1/3 chances now, its 1/2 chances now, you will never chose the door that was shown with the undesired result.... so its never gonna be an option or a probability.

I think the Monty Hall problem doesn't apply if the game show host has the choice to either open or not one of the gates with a goat. If he's forced to open one every time, only then does the chance become 2/3

@antmess9789

Ай бұрын

Well that's obvious. If a door is never opened, your odds never change from the start, 1/3 of winning with any door.

@rancor4513

Ай бұрын

​@@antmess9789he means that if the host can choose to open the door with a car, obv he wont because then there wont be much of a point

@antmess9789

Ай бұрын

@@rancor4513 He won't because it's the rules.

@pocketaces47

Ай бұрын

'

@trnphantom2586

Ай бұрын

@@rancor4513he wont and no matter what door you choose, the host can open a door with a goat

We need Spacey back in our movies

Ok for this riddle it may actually be wrong as it is no gurantee that the show host would always open another door, it was not stated in the question yet it is the most important part.

This scene always attracts people who overconfidently don't understand the Monty Hall problem but think they do.

@loganshaw4527

Ай бұрын

(One door 33._333%), 66._666%[ one door (one door 33._333%)50%, one door (one door 33._333%)50% ] =100% Pick one door 33% you are right. One door is shown as wrong you being right changes to 50%, if you change you answer still 50% you are right.

@BaldianOfIbelin

Ай бұрын

@@loganshaw4527 no I'm tired of writing the same message 6 times, just look up the Monty Python problem for yourself and you'll see why 50%/50% is not the correct answer.

@PhabioTheHost

Ай бұрын

@@loganshaw4527 incorrect. Swapping results in a 67% win rate.

@neiljohnson7914

Ай бұрын

@@loganshaw4527 Wrong. Suppose the game show host doesn't open any doors and simply offers you the choice of keeping your initial choice or both the remaining doors and if the car is in any of the other two doors then you win it. What choice would you make?

@loganshaw4527

Ай бұрын

@@neiljohnson7914 would go with Neil that is 67%

For those who don’t understand: Let’s say there are 100 doors and you chose door number 1. The host then tells you that he HAS to eliminate 98 doors but he CANNOT eliminate the correct door. So you are now left with a choice: choose door 1 or the door the host left remaining (let’s say door 2). The thing that gives it away is that the Host cannot eliminate the correct door. Meaning that if one of the doors is wrong the other one HAS to be correct, keep this in mind. Because there are only 2 doors remaining. At the start you had a 99/100 chance to choose the wrong door. Meaning that 99/100 times, the first door (the one you chose) will be wrong. And because one of the doors is wrong, by law the other door has to be correct. What will happen is the following: 99/100 times you will choose the wrong door and because one of the doors is probably (99%) wrong, the other has to be right because at the end out of the two doors one will always be right. Because 99% of the time you choose the wrong door, the host will then be forced 99% of the time to leave another door, the correct door remaining as the other choice. Comment if you can’t understand.

@Tacos18

Ай бұрын

So basically. 🚪 🚪 🚪 ⬆️ I choose this door. Host eliminates one door 🚪 🚪 🚪 ⬆️ 🟥 Because I chose the door before another was eliminated, it's most likely to be wrong. 🚪 🚪 🚪 🟥 🟩 🟥 So, unless you got lucky, the remaining door is most likely to be the correct one.

@michaelbrooks6416

Ай бұрын

The game show host could have chosen the 2nd door vs the 3rd Door knowing that he had already selected the correct one.. meaning that if he could trick you by just taking a bad door away, knowing he left a bad one for him to select if he choose, he use your statistics against you. While mathematically it could make sense, butreality is you were tricked in to moving off of the correct answer.

@amirgohar8991

Ай бұрын

@@michaelbrooks6416 The chances of you moving off of the correct answer is 1/3 as you saw in the video. And the chances of moving to the correct answer is 2/3. The host cannot remove the correct door. And at the start you have a 1/3 chance to pick the correct door no matter what. So no matter which door you choose at the start, there is nothing the host can do to trick you. You always have the advantage.

@user-vx9tk3ob9p

Ай бұрын

@@Tacos18so essentially, he can’t eliminate the door you chose and also cannot eliminate the right door, meaning that when there are only two doors left you had most likely picked a wrong door. In the beginning because it was a 1/100 chance to pick the right one, and because he can’t eliminate the right door either, the right door is gonna be the other one 99% of the time. Did i get that right?

@harshvarshney5747

Ай бұрын

Best explanation, I understood the problem by this comment, must be pinned.

Scott Steiner has entered the chat

No matter what went on with Kevin spacy, which I don't concorde, this man was still a great actor

"A Goat in the hand worth more than a car in the bush."

@babahogs490

Ай бұрын

LMAOOOOOO

@daviddownes248

29 күн бұрын

Well, you can never have enough goats ! 😀

If any one ask the movie is called 21