The bite of 87 was such a vital part of the series back then. There were countless debates and videos on this topic. People would accuse literally anyone of committing the nibbling of 87 (I still remember how one KZreadr was seriously saying that Withered Bonnie did it💀) The loss of its significance is the perfect example of Scott's messy writing. Not only was it left unsolved, but with FNaF 4 in the picture, there is a whole new bite, which at the very least lowers the uniqueness of 87 one. Nowadays, the bite of 87 is only remembered because of the meme where Markiplier confuses the bite of 83 with it. What was once so important and interesting is now forgotten and lost among all the bullshit that the modern FNaF lore is. Alas, that's what happens to the story when it isn't planned well.

@jerakaigamez

4 ай бұрын

This comment pretty much sums it up. It used to be a massive point of discussion but because of the lore and the fnaf 4 bite it just turned into a meme. I wish they didn't over complicate the lore

@YOSHIGOD-kz3ft

3 ай бұрын

How long did this take you 💀💀

I kinda figured that the day shift position becoming available in the end of FNAF 2 implied the day guard was the bite victim

@jerakaigamez

4 ай бұрын

Yes thats the most common theory

The bite of 87 kinda, got ruined for a number of reasons . We never actually saw it. . We still to this day they don’t have any confirmation about who did it (I mean let’s be honest it was mangle but it’s still not confirmed) . It wasn’t actually the thing that closed the location that was the DCI so that makes it way less important because it’s just an extra thing that happened (also the DCI is easily most pointless and odd plot point in fnaf history) . The bite of 83 pulled up and made it less unique since there’s 2 separate times somebody got bitten. (crying child really should’ve died some other way) . I don’t think it’s ever been brought up in the series again post 2

@jerakaigamez

4 ай бұрын

The bite wasn't set up well enough in fnaf2 because if other factors and when the lore got convoluted it just just turned into a meme.

@onioncutterninja1535

4 ай бұрын

About CC dying either way i think the same way. I imagine that Scott already planned on making Crying Child die to the bite of 87 but because he realized that'd make Fredbear's Family Diner completely irrelevant he decided to add importance to the universe's past restaurant using a different incident. So basically we could say the Bite of 87 got semi-retconned? the info wasn't changed, just placed somewhere else under a different name and date.

My comment has nothing to do with the bite of 87 itself but, if I'm being honest, looking back now, the bite of 83 was such a stupid event. A child was being bullied by his brother till a prank about kissing Fredbear got him stuck into the animatronic's mouth, causing him to lose part of his brain. In all honesty now, if you told me this was coming straight from The Return to Freddy's or Dormitabis, I'd totally believe you. But being the Bite of 83 really a stupid event or not, I'll always love the OG era of FNAF

@jerakaigamez

4 ай бұрын

It kinda took the story in a dumb direction if im being honest

@onioncutterninja1535

4 ай бұрын

As stupid as it was, being shown as an arcade game with weird, muffled ambience as the crying child struggles to get out, building tension until it all gets interrupted by the loud noise of the bite as the poor guy's body ceases all the movement is quite shocking. Oh also, about the dormitabis thing i agree, it really sounds like something out of that game considering all of the edgy things that happened because one character got bullied. But instead of there being some kind of revenge the bully victim just dies and makes everyone feel bad.

@jajaleco

4 ай бұрын

​@@onioncutterninja1535 i have to agree with you, the tension was built just the right way to make you feel the impact of seeing a child just losing part of their brain (even more if you consider that we likely do play as said kid during the nights of fnaf 4 and therefore have already consolidated a kind of emotional bond with them). It's more that looking in retrospect now the whole thing sounds goofy. Just like Garvey in Dormitabis killing children for making fun of his skin color

@onioncutterninja1535

4 ай бұрын

@@jajaleco yeah, i see where you're coming from, makes sense.

The animatronic who committed the bite of 87 was the fnaf world coffee machine character and the victim was Bob the day shift guard.

@jerakaigamez

2 ай бұрын

Omg no way!

Fnaf lore peaked with fnaf 3 imo

@jerakaigamez

4 ай бұрын

Facts!!

@Sonicmid

4 ай бұрын

I honestly agree The only problem with Fnaf 3 story is that . The phantoms really should’ve been the mci kids . The lack of DCI is extremely strange.

Was that the bite of 87?

@jerakaigamez

4 ай бұрын

yes

@user-eb5wu8rc2l

4 ай бұрын

@@jerakaigamezyes

@user-eb5wu8rc2l

4 ай бұрын

@@jerakaigamezyes

As the story has moved ever forward (especially by Security Breach), I've looked back in hindsight... The Bite of '87 originally seemed like a plot thread with potential to be unraveled in some sequel (a "Chekhov's Gun"), but, when put in perspective by time, a clear picture emerges: It was just a "Noodle Incident". Zero exposition, sparse details given with zero context, used for a quick laugh-- all telltale signs. Everyone just clung to it because FNaF1 was a mysterious game with scarce details.

The "WAS IT ME?" buildup in FNAF 4 really made it seem like the bite we saw in game was the Bite of 87, and that the whole game centered around the bite. But then Sister Location essentially confirmed that it wasn't the Bite of 87, with the keypad. So now we don't even know what the text was supposed to mean.

Imo they should kept the bite of 83 being the actual bite of 87. The idea of bites is kinda stupid(and yes ik about the comercial in Fnaf4 with the written 1983 but it could have simply been the year when Fredbear's Family Dinner was founded and the actions that play during the cutscenes happen in 1987). For me Fredbear's bite will remain the actual 87 bite

Really well made video

@jerakaigamez

4 ай бұрын

Cheers boss

Lucky for y'all, I never forgot The Bite Of '87! Ever!

@jerakaigamez

4 ай бұрын

Dubs

I only remembered the bite of 87 cause Markiplier

@jerakaigamez

3 ай бұрын

LMAO

2 min gang also Jerakai sounds sick during this video

@jerakaigamez

4 ай бұрын

I indeed am haha

@kwakotx

4 ай бұрын

6 min

@jerakaigamez

4 ай бұрын

Dubs

If I remember correctly, you can get lawsuits about animatronics bitting children in Pizzeria Simulator. Which means that these Bites are a common event, and the reason why The Bite of 87 is called that way is because another one happened before.

@jerakaigamez

4 ай бұрын

I think that's a dumb lore point, if bites are common, how does this restaurant stay afloat. While I get criticised on my love for the realism, this is why. The bite of 87 was unique because being the only bite, that was it the animatronics were now glued to the stage. Makes you wonder why that was the nail in the coffin if it had happened before. Also if it took place in hurricane Utah then having one bite ruin the reputation makes sense cause it's not a big town

Did you forget that UCN exists? Toy chica voice lines are there xD

I'm pretty sure the whole argument about the 83 date is because that i guess some people don't know how dating a tv show works. It'll keep the original copyright date no matter when you view it.

@jerakaigamez

4 ай бұрын

True but for a game theres really no reason for it to specify a date like that unless it was related to the year it took place in.

@KarmaGrass

4 ай бұрын

@@jerakaigamez ambiance is a good reason if any.

@jerakaigamez

3 ай бұрын

With how cryptic scott was at the time, theres no way.

@KarmaGrass

3 ай бұрын

@@jerakaigamez Fnaf 4 has the most unanswered questions. Like the box thing. It wouldn't surprise me that Scott would hop on the fan bandwagon after everyone's convinced it occurs in 83.