Glad to see Meredith mentioned. She is somehow getting lost in all the mess sorrounding her passing.

@JoyJazz14

4 ай бұрын

Very true 100% agree.

@Loralanthalas

4 ай бұрын

Ah. New to true crime and crime stories. The introduction focusing on her told me more about her then Ive ever heard before. (NOT that I've ever cared to follow the media sensationalized BS which is almost akeqys 100% tabloid entertainment since "news" is America is a private for profit business). She sounded like an absolutely wonderful young women. Having said that: it was MUCH more of a bio, background, and humanizing then most victims in true crime get.

@ninedaysjane2466

4 ай бұрын

@@Loralanthalas 🙄

@ulalaFrugilega

4 ай бұрын

If you search her name on youtube, the first 10 videos are titled "Amanda Knox"...

@shona-

4 ай бұрын

Yes whilst Amanda's riding on the fame 🙄 becoming a 'media personality'

I like how the title thumbnail doesn’t mention anything about Amanda Knox…it doesn’t rely on clickbait or sensationalism…

@ulalaFrugilega

4 ай бұрын

Me, too. And so does the podcast (where I get my Casefile, before coming here to comment and find opinions.

@annabasnatural

3 ай бұрын

Me too because I’m sick of this case being all about Amanda and Meredith gets forgotten

I like the way you name the victims, instead of the perpetrators. I've seen it in several of your cases and I think it's very respectful. You do a very good job. Thank you for these cases. Best regards.

YAY, 'The Voice' returns 😁 We missed you 🥰

@texastea5686

4 ай бұрын

I was getting nervous!

The finest true crime information site, Casefile is the standard by which all podcasts should aspire to. Thank you for the excellent work CF!

@mytrip6991

3 ай бұрын

There were many factual errors in this video including: 1) 4:53: Amanda was not "22", she had turned 20 the previous July. 2) 5:33: Meredith did not attend the Univ. for Foreigners; she attended the Univ. of Perugia. Knox attended the Univ. for Foreigners. 3) 10:33: Amanda did not see the blood on the bath mat before taking the shower as claimed here. Amanda reported seeing 3 tiny drops of dried blood on the faucet (not in the sink) and took a shower. She only saw the watery bloody footprint on the bath mat when she stepped out of the shower onto the mat. (See her testimony) 4) 11:27: It wasn't Filomena who "was worried that Meredith might have cut herself and gone out to seek medical care accidentally leaving the front door open behind her", but her friend, Paola Grande, who suggested that to Filomena. (see Filomena's interview with Mignini on Dec 3, 2007 pg. 40) 5) 12:42: "This time Amanda told her someone's been in your room. They smashed your window but it's bizarre it doesn't look like they've taken anything." Amanda never told Filomena that. It was Raffaele who told the police that because Amanda didn't see anything obvious taken, including a valuable camera and laptop in plain sight in Filomena's room. 6)13:07- "at 12:35 p.m. two officers from the postal police arrived at number seven via Dela pergola" This is what the postal police claimed, but the court records show that they arrived AFTER the 112 calls had been concluded at 12:55: the second 112 call at 12:54:39 lasted 57 seconds (Sollecito's cellphone log) so the postal police could NOT have arrived before then at 12:35. Why did the narrator not mention this? Hellmann Report: "There has been much discussion on whether the call to 112 happened before or after the arrival of the Police, with it having been hypothesized by the Public Minister that the call to the Carabinieri at 112 had been made on seeing the arrival of the Police, just to validate the notion [tesi] of their innocence. Except that even the Corte di Assise of first level, on the basis of the testimony given by the on-duty Police personnel and of the times reproduced from the logs, arrived at the conclusion that these calls had been made before the arrival of the Police and unaware of their imminent arrival. 7) 14:16- " but strangely valuable items such as a laptop, gold jewelry, a digital camera and designer sunglasses sat untouched out in the open" No gold jewelry was 'out in the open'. Filomena's jewelry was in box in her nightstand: QUESTION - and then the jewelry was kept where? ANSWER - In a bedside jewelry case in the nightstand. (Romanelli testimony Feb 3, 2009)

I'm just saying so please hear me out.. there is NO ONE out there (podcast or youtube) who gets to make the story (any story) more interesting than you. I'm talking details, deep dive on the background, flow of info, cadence and.. that voice & accent.. c'mon. Trust me on that, I WAS searching while you were afk :) You're episodes are the GOAT. Thanks a lot and.. I hope to see your channel's 1 milion subs soon! So.. hit that button everybody!

@user-fr1xs2rm8r

4 ай бұрын

I whole heartedly agree, I love listening to casefile, def one of my favourites, so well done..

@MR-pv7qg

4 ай бұрын

Strongly agree 😂

@BackyardButcher

4 ай бұрын

💯💯

@sadiec2701

3 ай бұрын

Sub button hit! I just watched my first video from this channel a couple of weeks ago and have been playing catch-up since, so happy to be here!

this episode is so sad, listening to how so many innocent people were wronged is truly terrible to hear. i find the fact that Patrick was in prison for 3 WEEKS without any evidence is honestly ridiculous, how can the police arrest a man purely based on one person's testimony without even trying to find evidence first. and poor amanda, the way the press and media dragged her name through the mud is tragic, both her and her boyfriend deserved so much better. the italian police really let down so many people with this case.

@mytrip6991

25 күн бұрын

It wasn't even Knox's 'testimony' ; it was two statements written up by the police and signed by Knox which she retracted within hours of the illegally obtained statements more than once. The police ignored them including the one where she clearly wrote she couldn't now who the murderer was because she didn't go back to the cottage that night.

@robokill387

21 күн бұрын

Amanda did it, no ifs or bits about it. I don't care what anyone says. All this case proves is that an American white girl can get away with anything if she cries hard enough.

@mytrip6991

21 күн бұрын

@@robokill387 In other words, you've formed an opinion solely based on her being 'an American white girl' and it doesn't matter what evidence there is that she's not guilty, you don't care. If you ever sit on a jury, I just pray the defendant isn't "an American white girl".

@paulsansonetti7410

13 күн бұрын

​@@mytrip6991Amanda Knox is guilty AF Just because people realize that Karen's often get their way , doesn't mean there wasn't plenty of evidence against Amanda

@paulsansonetti7410

13 күн бұрын

​@@mytrip6991 Late in the evening, at 10:40 PM, on November 5, 2007 Raffaele was called to the police station to answer some questions. Amanda tagged along though she wasn’t expected to be there. Soon after being questioned alone, Raffaele admitted that Amanda had put him up to lying and saying that she was with him that whole night. However, this was all “rubbish.” Raffaele then told the police that Amanda had gone out that night and did not return until 1:00 AM. On the night of the murder, both Raffaele and Amanda uncharacteristically turned off their cell phones at approximately 8:45 PM and kept them off until 6:00 AM the following morning. Amanda and Raffaele had told the police that they had slept until 10:30 AM that morning which is a contradiction to Raffaele’s cell phone being turned on at 6:00 AM, another lie. Their cell phone records, changing alibis, and slander establish the fact that Amanda and Raffaele lied multiple times during the investigation. Because of this, nothing they say can be taken at face value.

2+ Hour video?!?! What did we do to deserve this?

@linziwade2529

4 ай бұрын

Waited 2 months!!!!! I have been refreshing like crazy I gotta get my case file fix!

@michellerenner6880

4 ай бұрын

We are in the middle of snowmageddon….

@loredanadincu4300

4 ай бұрын

​@linziwade2529 they had a break. Every year they do in the same time period.

@johnguzman8637

4 ай бұрын

Pppp😅please l

@gyrollsphere

4 ай бұрын

Only waited what felt like 10 years.

What a way to start the new year!!! My heart aches for Meredith and her family 💐

The poor Kercher family. R.I.P. Meredith 😢

@billycoo7916

4 ай бұрын

What truth? We all know the truth. Rudy Guede broke into the house and raped and killed Meredith. Is there something I’m missing?

@patrickjackman8688

4 ай бұрын

Truth is clear she was murdered by rudy geude

@ninedaysjane2466

4 ай бұрын

The truth is 100% clear. You just desperately want Amanda to be guilty and it's bizarre.

@simon01ize

4 ай бұрын

​@@ninedaysjane2466 You call me obsessive! How much are they paying you ?

@lorraineselby

4 ай бұрын

@@ninedaysjane2466do you think she was guilty? I think she was just a scapegoat

All I can say is- Poor Meredith.....and Meredith's Mum and Dad must have felt totally robbed of justice.

@mytrip6991

2 ай бұрын

They did feel robbed of justice because they totally accepted what the police and prosecution were telling them which is absolutely normal. Families of victims seldom side with the defense unless the defendant is also a family member/loved one. It's a normal reaction to believe those who are telling you they have identified the one/ones who murdered your loved one. Some families cannot accept a defendant's acquittal even after evidence proves they are innocent.

@robokill387

21 күн бұрын

Except Amanda wasn't innocent, she's 110% guilty and got away with murder.

@mytrip6991

21 күн бұрын

@@robokill387 Because, according to you in another comment, an "American white girls can get away with anything if she cries hard enough." You've made up your mind and no matter what evidence shows she's not guilty you "don't care".

Casefile, thank you! Not only a top quality production, with in depth and incisive research ....but also.... no ads!!!! Thanks again!

my partner taught Meredith and went to her funeral. My partner is still haunted by her murder.

@ulalaFrugilega

4 ай бұрын

Understandable.

450am, Feb 03 in Texas and I'm here for this!!

Can’t believe this well researched channel hasn’t hit a million by now 🤔

@ulalaFrugilega

4 ай бұрын

Maybe because it's mainly a podcast?

Another great episode guys. Best true crime pod out there that doesn’t make light of the real cases for entertainment. Always expertly researched! So sad that I recognised Amanda Knox’s name from the press at the time, but not the victim’s name in this case.

@charliekezza

4 ай бұрын

Same here 😢

Welcome back Casefiles Presents. What a long wait but worth it. I swear we don't deserve Casefiles 😅

Casefile is epic. Voice, tone, and pace, ten out of ten. Content, compassion for victims 1st class. Always grips me from start to finish. Outstanding work. Thank you. I can't live without you. Please please never stop doing this. Love from a uk top fan. Xx

@ulalaFrugilega

4 ай бұрын

Absolutely agree. Started to listen to the podcast with episode 3 and have loved it like no other ever since. Might it be possible the Anonymous Host invented focusing on the victims, giving them a true platform, making their stories known, where - at least at the time - anybody was just fascinated by the perpetrators... the trend in true Crime has since followed him, but is receding already, I feel, and I can't stand it anymore... victims hardly being mentioned by name, certainly not recognisable as individual persons, while killers are being fawned over as o so interesting people.

I have noticed that many have always believed Amanda Knox was guilty, and I have come to the conclusion that all these years later, many STILL believe she was guilty of the horrific crimes, or had some input. And there are so many peeps here in the comments sticking up for Amandas' character, but noone has actually addressed whyyyyyy she initially implicated the bar owner at the beginning of the investigation, and later retracted it. THATTTTT fact alone has made me feel quite uneasy with her her character and testimony.

@dsugar120

4 ай бұрын

Really? In all of your readings on this murder you have never seen the words "internalized false confession", or anyone pointing out that when Amanda and Raffaele were "interviewed" that all of the cops forgot to press the record button resulting in no recordings of Amanda or Raffaele's interrogations. In my readings, I have seen extensive discussion on why Amanda would falsely accuse her former boss.

@petroszakhariadis8623

4 ай бұрын

@@dsugar120 no matter the reasons, NO ONE would EVER falsely accuse another innocent person for murder. regardless, she is to this day, due to face court in 2024 for "slandering" the bar owner, which I think is rightly so. If someone accused meeeeee of such murder, i would do everything, like Patrick, the bar owner, to bring this Amanda to face justice for such an atroscious accusation

@dsugar120

4 ай бұрын

@@petroszakhariadis8623 Please do me a favour and read the following: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_confession, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/West_Memphis_Three, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norfolk_Four, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_Park_jogger_case. The West Memphis Three, Norfolk Four, and the Central Park Five are cases where innocent suspects falsely accused other innocent people. Once you agree that false accusation happen, and are unfortunately more common than one would have thought, you can objectively look at why Amanda may have accused an innocent man.

@dsugar120

4 ай бұрын

@@petroszakhariadis8623 Please do me a favour and read the following: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_confession, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/West_Memphis_Three, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norfolk_Four, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_Park_jogger_case. The West Memphis Three, Norfolk Four, and the Central Park Five are cases where innocent suspects falsely accused other innocent people. Once you agree that false accusation happen, and are unfortunately more common than one would have thought, you can objectively look at why Amanda may have accused an innocent man.

@dsugar120

4 ай бұрын

@@petroszakhariadis8623 Please do me a favour and read the following: false confessions, West Memphis Three, Norfolk Four, Central Park Five. The West Memphis Three, Norfolk Four, and the Central Park Five are cases where innocent suspects falsely accused other innocent people. False confessions, including ones that the suspect accuses other innocents (because that's what the police interrogators are looking for) happen more often than we think. Once you agree that false accusation happen, and are unfortunately more common than one would have thought, you can objectively look at why Amanda may have accused an innocent man.

Great coverage of this unbelievable case. The attitude of the Italian police and prosecution team was beyond words, just appalling. And the sloppiness of the investigation at the crime scene was shocking. Hats off the the defence team though, picking their way through the chaos and duplicitous 'evidence' presented to them. It feels like there's still nothing absolutely conclusive but, short of being able to preserve the crime scene and correctly collect the evidence all over again, it seems likely that they got their man in Rudy G. I did wonder about Rudy G's guilt after it was stated that Meredith could have defended herself against one attacker and therefore there must have been more, but then I remembered that she was exhausted at the time so perhaps could have more easily been overpowered by just one individual. One thing is certain though, it appears ridiculously easy to skew how the 'evidence' of a case will be perceived which seems to have been expertly done by the prosecution and Italian police, as I too was initially convinced, on what was being fed to us by the media, of Knox's guilt. What a nightmare for all involved, excepting the guilty party, of course.

@rockstarofredondo

4 ай бұрын

Men can easily overpower women, karate training or not. People who have never been in actual fights or sparred in some sort of training really overestimate “karate” and other bogus martial arts, so it’s being brought up like it means something when it really doesn’t. It’s not going to give her any kind of advantage over a crazed criminal with a knife, probably high on drugs.

@BrennaDraws

4 ай бұрын

Karate isn’t practical. It’s for choreographic sparring. I’m an actual fight it isn’t going to help you much beyond having taught you to punch properly.

@mytrip6991

4 ай бұрын

Women are overpowered by single attackers hundreds of times every single day of the year around the world. The most common excuse that she couldn't have been is that she "knew karate". No, she didn't. She had a beginner's orange belt which is totally useless in defense.

@ulalaFrugilega

4 ай бұрын

To those putting karate as a means for defense, I say: correct. But it does make one strong. And fear for your life will also make one strong. And what about the evidence proving that she was held tight by the wrists with two hands while being stabbed (I heard that elsewhere). Anyway, glad this is not my life, neither of those. Sad for an obviously very nice young person's life being gone for kicks and fun, as I perceive it.

@mytrip6991

4 ай бұрын

@@ulalaFrugilega Kercher only had beginner's orange belt according to her father. Useless for defense. "And what about the evidence proving that she was held tight by the wrists with two hands while being stabbed (I heard that elsewhere)." Be careful relying on what you 'hear' anywhere unless it's a credible source backed up with evidence. In this case, it's not. The pathologists' reports mention no bruises on her wrists but bruises on face, neck, left elbow, right forearm, right hand, left thigh, right shin, over both iliac crests of the pelvic bone, vaginal area and skull. See Drs. Lalli's and Cingolani's reports. ' very nice young person's life being gone for kicks and fun, as I perceive it." Your perception is not based on the evidence. Can you explain how 3 people could participate in a violent, hand-on sexual assault and murder and only ONE of them leave multiple pieces of forensic evidence behind? Only Guede left his DNA in several place including Kercher's body, bra, jacket and in Kercher's blood on her purse, his fingerprint in her blood, his shoeprints in her blood.

One of many qualities which I appreciate on this channel is the time that is given to the person murdered by the maniac. I have seen numerous documentaries signing the praises of A.K. Onl her I have learned anything about Meredith Kercher.

@ninedaysjane2466

4 ай бұрын

I've never heard anyone "singing the praises" of Amanda Knox, except the poor Italian guy who was in love with her. She just isn't guilty, no matter how much you want her to be.

@rockstarofredondo

4 ай бұрын

@@ninedaysjane2466thank you. These people are deranged. Knox has been through years of worldwide slander, bullying and abuse and the gaslighting of the OP’s comment is just unreal. How do they sleep at night?

@honeybadger3570

4 ай бұрын

​@@ninedaysjane2466 Where did OP say they thought AK was guilty? Don't manipulate someone's statement to fit your negative soul. Stating they've only heard about Amanda Knox all of this time and expressing appreciation for now getting to hear about Meredith doesn't imply they think AK is guilty. What kinda twisted delusions creates your logic?

@honeybadger3570

4 ай бұрын

​@@rockstarofredondo​ Thank you? 😳 *Calling people derogatory names for their observations is deranged.* Just because you don't prefer the group of words they chose "singing praises" does not make OP deranged and it's unfortunate you're not ashamed of yourself for saying so. I don't know how old you are but I lived through this case in real time when it occurred and there absolutely WAS a lot of social outcry *across the world* for a looong time, including many expressing praise for A.K bc she was being falsely charged with mrdr - ofc there were tons to people "singing her praise" bc they were trying to show the world she was innocent... Bc of that, Meredith and her life lost so tragically seemed to have been forgotten, not mentioned, no longer part of her own story bc of how the police handled the case and how they treated A.K. OP stating what their experience has been with this case being focused on AK all these years, and being appreciative of finally learning about Meredith is a very normal, decent, human thing to do. Criticizing that, is deranged

@ulalaFrugilega

4 ай бұрын

I like that, too, it's typical for Casefile and the reason why I consider it by a very wide margin the best true crime outlet anywhere.

I think it's absolutely insane that the actual murderer and rapist got only 13 years in prison. Italian justice system massive L

Casefiles is back! 🕵‍♂👍

Yaaaa! We've missed this voice! 🎉🎉🎉

Welocme back missed Casefile so much and thanku xx

Damn.. I was waiting for you. Woo!

Finally back from break with a 2 hour ep. Hell yeah

Oh!!!! My favourite bro is back ..i was waiting like hell for you bro❤

WE MISSED YOU :))

How is this the best documentary on Meredith's case that's out there? It's fantastic

@mytrip6991

2 ай бұрын

It's full of factual errors.

@chriscavy

2 ай бұрын

@@mytrip6991 Can you point me to a better one?

@mytrip6991

2 ай бұрын

@@chriscavy I wish I could but they all have errors, some worse than others. The trouble is that most of them are getting their information from other videos or off the internet and not from the court records. They often have little understanding of how the Italian justice system works when it comes to definitive judgments and judicial facts or what DNA can and can't tell us. Even the books on the case, almost all written before the final 2015 SC annulment or even before 2013, contain errors. Among the absolute worst are those 'online only' books (and I hate to even use that word for them) by Nick Van der Leek and the one by Barbie Nadeau who are both notoriously pro-guilt and error ridden. I'd suggest reading Amanda's and Raffaele's books as they are, at least, written by the two who experienced it. I do know that those who are pro-guilt will just claim the books are self-serving. As far as videos, stay away from "body language" experts who spout nonsense like the Behavior Panel. Scientific studies have shown it's unreliable and no more accurate at detecting deception than chance. But the worst of the worst videos are those by Robert Glass. She's absolutely nuts and she makes the most outrageous false and disproven claims. She's one of the worst pushers of misinformation and downright lies on the internet on this case.

Welcome back , im so glad you back , I wa# so worried that you closed shop , thank you from Sydney Australia

Omg yes!!!! Thank you! I’ve been waiting!

So happy to see a new upload!

been listening to this dude since 2016. time goes by so fast

Oh my god its so great to have you back . Missed you so much❤❤

Missed you buddy. Glad you're back.

OMG I had missed Casefile soooo much! This is incredible!

Yes! Casfile has a new video! The best true crime narrarator on YT! 😊

Stellar content as always!!!! Much 💜!

Thank God you boys are back. I've missed you all!

So happy your back ❤

Corrections 1. Postal police arrived at 12;57 not 12;35 - proof by garage video 2. Amanda seen bathmat blood after she showered 3. Bra was never cut anywhere, stitching was ripped. 4. Glass was never found on top of "moved" items(crime scene pics), but why would it matter, the burglar is ransacking, bizarre. 5. The rock was the size of a softball 2kilos. 6. No mud was present below the window. 7. Glass was inside below the window can be seen to this day, crime scene pics. 8.Filomena's window was below the road and any headlights. 9. Meredith never complained about Amanda, never happened. 10. RS never changed his story, he was forced to sign a document authored by police. 11. There was no bleach receipt ever found in this case. 12. Police thought RS shoes were a perfect match. 13. All prints found with luminol were unwiped and NEGATIVE for blood. 14. all profiles were omitted except for the five, RG RS AK MK PL 15. It rained on the 30th not Halloween.

@davidlister7214

22 күн бұрын

You seem to have read all of the evidence. Quite a few years ago I spent a long weekend reading it all myself. Let me ask you. Do you think Knox/Sollecito were involved?

@mytrip6991

20 күн бұрын

"8.Filomena's window was below the road and any headlights." I personally took videos from the parking garage roof across the street of cars driving by at night. Their headlights did NOT illuminate Filomena's window, so I know for a fact that your statement is accurate.

CF....as always, you are the BEST!!!!!💝

Fantastic 2 hours now my Saturday morning is off to a great start. Especially the first video of 2024 is a treat.

Welcome back case file

Missed you. Best true crime podcast out there 👏

Yay...ur back.! .missed u on a saturday...Hope alla ok with u.? Great vid..thnku ❤

Hurray!! I missed you ❤

Thankyou casefile ❤

Media and gossips have a lot to be guilty of.

Thank you for coming back!

Good Saturday morning Casefile

Oh good, you're back 😃

Recent sub going through your vids. You are excellent at reporting these cases with truth and empathy. I am now watching the Karen Read trial in Massachusetts USA. WOW! The way the media can be used by the law enforcement and the prosecution has put a lot of people in jail. With the media against you it is more like you are guilty full stop. Thank you for always remembering the victims.

Very good video, thank you!

Casefile Presents is.....BRILLIANT!!!!!!! This is my first time on here. FABULOUS.!!!!!!!

@mytrip6991

2 ай бұрын

It only seems brilliant if you don't know the case facts. There are numerous factual errors in it including: 1) 4:53: Amanda was not "22", she had turned 20 the previous July. 2) 5:33: Meredith did not attend the Univ. for Foreigners; she attended the Univ. of Perugia. Knox attended the Univ. for Foreigners. 3) 10:33: Amanda did not see the blood on the bath mat before taking the shower as claimed here. Amanda reported seeing 3 tiny drops of dried blood on the faucet (not in the sink) and took a shower. She only saw the watery bloody footprint on the bath mat when she stepped out of the shower onto the mat. (See her testimony) 4) 11:27: It wasn't Filomena who "was worried that Meredith might have cut herself and gone out to seek medical care accidentally leaving the front door open behind her", but her friend, Paola Grande, who suggested that to Filomena. (see Filomena's interview with Mignini on Dec 3, 2007 pg. 40) 5) 12:42: "This time Amanda told her someone's been in your room. They smashed your window but it's bizarre it doesn't look like they've taken anything." Amanda never told Filomena that. It was Raffaele who told the police that because Amanda didn't see anything obvious taken, including a valuable camera and laptop in plain sight in Filomena's room. 6)13:07- "at 12:35 p.m. two officers from the postal police arrived at number seven via Dela pergola" This is what the postal police claimed, but the court records show that they arrived AFTER the 112 calls had been concluded at 12:55: the second 112 call at 12:54:39 lasted 57 seconds (Sollecito's cellphone log) so the postal police could NOT have arrived before then at 12:35. Why did the narrator not mention this? Hellmann Report: "There has been much discussion on whether the call to 112 happened before or after the arrival of the Police, with it having been hypothesized by the Public Minister that the call to the Carabinieri at 112 had been made on seeing the arrival of the Police, just to validate the notion [tesi] of their innocence. Except that even the Corte di Assise of first level, on the basis of the testimony given by the on-duty Police personnel and of the times reproduced from the logs, arrived at the conclusion that these calls had been made before the arrival of the Police and unaware of their imminent arrival. 7) 14:16- " but strangely valuable items such as a laptop, gold jewelry, a digital camera and designer sunglasses sat untouched out in the open" No gold jewelry was 'out in the open'. Filomena's jewelry was in box in her nightstand: QUESTION - and then the jewelry was kept where? ANSWER - In a bedside jewelry case in the nightstand. (Romanelli testimony Feb 3, 2009)

@margaretstewart2575

2 ай бұрын

Wow that's an awful lot of errors. That's not fair on anyone in this, if the facts aren't absolutely correct. One or two maybe, but that's way too much.

@mytrip6991

2 ай бұрын

@@margaretstewart2575 Those are just the ones I found up to 14:16 minutes. The amount of misinformation on this case that is on the internet is shocking.

Excellent!

Hey you are back. Happy new year ° NZ

Hooray! Finally a new vid 😀

Yesssssssssss !!!!! We've missed you !!!

Knox was rightly acquitted of murder. But regrettable she has profited from the case and enjoyed successes on the back of it given that she falsely accused Patrick Lumumba.

@mytrip6991

2 ай бұрын

She was coerced into accusing PL by the police who wrongly believed her text message to him was confirming a meeting later that night. They had already decided they knew what had happened from that text and were hellbent on getting her to sign statements to that effect. Within hours she told the police in writing that she had been scared, exhausted, and confused and that she didn't think that the statements she'd signed was what actually happened. The next day she was even more sure that it did not happen and again told them so in writing. They ignored both and kept PL in jail until forensic evidence and a witness forced them to release him.

@chel3SEY

2 ай бұрын

@@mytrip6991 So you say. Doesn't sound remotely convincing to me. Even if she was tired and hungry after a long interrogation, she was not a child (though she often seemed to act like one). Her implication of an innocent man in such a horrific crime cannot be so easily excused as your unconvincing attempt. You make her sound psychotic. More likely she was just trying to throw Lumumba in the line of fire to distract from herself.

@mytrip6991

2 ай бұрын

@@chel3SEY It's not what I say; it's what happened. Rita Ficarra, Knox's main interrogator testified in court..which I doubt you've read...that she was scrolling through Knox's phone and found her text to PL: " 'Certo ci vediamo più tardi buona serata!'" (Ok. See you later, have a good night!). Ficarra testified she saw that as Knox meeting up with PL later that night. She testified she asked AK who 'Patrik'(sic) was as his name appeared as the recipient. Knox made NO mention of him before then to Ficarra. Within hours of her arrest, the Chief of Police Arturo de Felice announced to the press: "Initially the American gave a version of events we knew was not correct. She buckled and made an admission of facts we knew were correct and from that we were able to bring them in. They all participated but had different roles." The version of events Knox gave: She was at home with Raffaele all night. So how did the police "know" that was "not correct" as NO forensics test results had yet been reported to them and no witnesses said otherwise. Notice the use of the word "buckle" which means to bend or break UNDER PRESSURE after which she "made an admission" to what De Felice says the police "knew were correct" but they didn't as that NEVER HAPPENED. THEY were the ones insisting to Knox that she took PL there. "More likely she was just trying to throw Lumumba in the line of fire to distract from herself." Illogical. She IMPLICATES herself in a murder instead of sticking to her story that she never went there because she was trying to DISTRACT from herself? The police didn't charge her with being merely being in the kitchen; they charged her with actually helping to hold Meredith down while she was sexually assaulted and then being the one to kill her by sitting on top of her and cutting her throat. But there is not a single piece of evidence that she was even in that room: no DNA, no fingerprints, no bloody shoeprints. CAN YOU EXPLAIN how that could be possible? Guede certainly couldn't avoid leaving all that forensic evidence of his presence in that room.

@lilovs9952

2 ай бұрын

@@chel3SEYyour implication on her of such a horrific crime is awful.

Great video. That crime is suspicious in that they, Amanda and bf, may indeed be involved.

@rockstarofredondo

4 ай бұрын

Literally zero evidence of that whatsoever.

@alexbennet4195

23 күн бұрын

@@rockstarofredondoliterally evidence of that lmao

If Rudy acted alone, what would be his motivation for making it look like a break-in?

The fact that the police blamed Amanda, I don’t believe for a minute that Amanda committed this crime.

@ninedaysjane2466

4 ай бұрын

Many people (particularly in the UK) still believe it. It's nuts.

@rockstarofredondo

4 ай бұрын

@@ninedaysjane2466they WANT to believe it, despite there being zero evidence she was involved. Very similar to how people want to believe Chris Watts girlfriend was involved in his crimes despite a total lack of evidence. People often have agendas and being objective is not usually part of that.

@mytrip6991

4 ай бұрын

@@rockstarofredondo Absolutely. A big problem is that people form an opinion early on and usually on little knowledge about a case. They remain convinced of that opinion regardless of evidence that later emerges that their opinion is incorrect. People would rather BE wrong than admit they ARE wrong.

@margaretstewart2575

2 ай бұрын

Also the British press at the time was a absolute disgrace. There just wasn't enough evidence to conflict Amanda Knox and her boyfriend of murder.

I always thought Amanda Knox was innocent, but after listening to this podcast, I would have a hard time finding her not guilty in a court of law. There was an awful lot of forensic evidence , circumstantial evidence and witness testimony that put her and her boyfriend at the scene. Sociopaths hardly ever look the part.

I remember the news coverage on this case. What a convoluted mess.

Really good podcast, you can see you have done your research unlike other criminal profilers and crime YTbers with the regular A. Knox hoaxes. 👏

Oh how i have missed you!!🙌🏾🙌🏾🙌🏾

I think this is the most comprehensive study I've listened to on this case. Completely impartial and fair to everyone involved. I learned a lot of facts I had previously not known. I don't know we'll ever know 100% for sure what happened but I'm pretty sure Amanda Knox is innocent. The media have a thirst for sensationalising tragedy and this is one of the worst cases of all time, it's despicable the way they misrepresented Amanda Knox and also removed the focus from Meredith.

@mytrip6991

4 ай бұрын

It's very common for the media to concentrate on the murder suspect rather than the victim during the trial, especially after the initial reporting of the murder itself.

@grahamblack1961

4 ай бұрын

@@mytrip6991 Yeah but I don't think there's ever been a case quite so extreme as this, the whole thing became about 'Foxy Knoxy' the sexy femme fatal.

@mytrip6991

4 ай бұрын

@@grahamblack1961 I agree. This case had just the right sensational ingredients for the tabloid hacks like Nick Pisa: girl on girl murder, sexual assault, manipulated( by an evil 'vixen') men, 3 nationalities, etc. Amanda had no control over that at all.

@shona-

4 ай бұрын

​@@grahamblack1961 the whole foxy noxy name from the media was beyond disgusting. Rip meredith

@mytrip6991

3 ай бұрын

@@shona- You can thank the disgusting Nick Pisa for that. The same guy who admitted he didn't care if what he was reporting was accurate or not as long as he got paid.

🇬🇧 A really absorbing & complicated case! Casefiles as always, have pulled out all the stops on this one. The police did do a very thorough job but maybe too much evidence was indeed contaminated, too late to rectify but i also think The police did an excellent job in examining the truth of the scene In the false window breaking & Piecing together relevant facts & timelines. What i felt all through this was that amanda was a narcissist & quite manipulative & controlling I quite believe she didnt like Meredith & felt competitive towards her. She was a spolied girl & the number of times she retracted & Re-issued her statement, each time different from the last was a telling act. Meredith really does come in as a bit part player in this crime! Amanda has made the whole thing about herself! Narcissists are always the victim & never ever the guilty party ( i know very well as my 40yr old daughter is a high narcissist & life with them takes stainless steel temprament & nerves of a Ninja fighter!) Instead of counting herself lucky to have been given her freedom & life to live, & keeping a private life & getting on with everyday reality she had gone out on the public stage advocating this & that all about AMANDA! Its tough her family had legal bills! It happens! At least she had her life back But narcissists dont think that way, they feed off attention & victimhood! Making money from 2 books plus speaker fees, tv show fees.. Its irrelevant in a way (& im in no way disrespecting Merediths family or her memory) if amanda is guilty or not. She would always make this about herself. Her ex boyfriend was mightily lucky he got A Phonecall from her on their aquittal! My own gut feeling is the 3 of them were responsible for Merediths murder & they all got carried away in the attack frenzy & excitement & add the possible substance intoxicants which hightened the scene. The point is, none of them STOPPED what was happening & They COULD HAVE... Whoever used the knife on poor Meredith will never be known but the 3 of them knew it WAS one of them! Id have given them all jail time. Then amanda could have written her books quietly from jail or prison. Are narcisissts ever quiet? Yes, but thats the worrying time. Thanks loads Casefiles! We dont need pictures or maps or scenes, it detracts from your voice & evidence you present much more succinctly. Peace & Good Cheer to All 🇬🇧👧

@mytrip6991

4 ай бұрын

"The police did do a very thorough job but maybe too much evidence was indeed contaminated, too late to rectify but i also think The police did an excellent job in examining the truth of the scene.In the false window breaking & Piecing together relevant facts & timelines." That is far from an accurate description of the police investigation. In fact, it was so bad that the 2015 Supreme Court described it this way: "An objectively wavering process, the oscillations of which are the result of glaring failures or investigative “amnesias” and of culpable omissions in [24] investigating activities, which, had they been carried out, would have, probably, allowed from the start the outline a framework, if not of certainty, at least of reassuring reliability, in direction of either the guilt or the non-involvement of the current appellants. Such scenario, intrinsically contradictory, constitutes a first, eloquent, representation of an evidential set of anything but “beyond reasonable doubt”. The police investigation began with such immediate and false assumptions as "Only a woman would cover the victim" and that it was an "inside job". Immediately and falsely assumed was that the break-in was faked because "no one could enter the room through the window" (disproved by video of someone easily climbing to and sitting on the windowsill). Immediately and falsely assumed was that there "was only glass ABOVE items" which was contradicted by testimony of F. Romanelli that glass was BOTH ABOVE AND BELOW and unsupported by police photos. On day one of the investigation, Mignini refused to let Dr. Lalli, the pathologist, enter the bedroom to take the temperature of Kercher's body which would have given a more accurate Time of Death window which was hugely important to the defense. The police failed to gather important and obvious evidence from Kercher's room for 6 weeks: MK's bloody jacket, her blood-smeared purse, her bra clasp. They failed to secure the cottage during those six weeks and photos show it was turned upside down with items from the bedroom being removed and moved around with no record. Police video shows egregious and multiple violations of anti-contamination protocols by police on day one of the investigation. The police misidentified the bloody shoeprints as belonging to Sollecito's Nikes, when they actually belonged to Guede's Nikes. It took Sollecito's father and uncle to prove they belonged to Guede's shoes. Their claim the 112 calls were made after the arrival of the postal police was based on the parking garage video with a proven incorrect clock timestamp and Battistelli's claim he checked his watch upon arrival at the cottage when both the video and phone records prove that his claimed arrival time was impossibly early. All these disprove the claim that the police did a "very thorough" or "excellent job" or "piecing together relevant facts & timelines".

@mytrip6991

4 ай бұрын

2) "What i felt all through this was that amanda was a narcissist & quite manipulative & controlling. I quite believe she didnt like Meredith & felt competitive towards her." What you "felt" and "believe" is called "confirmation bias". There is no evidence she didn't like or felt competitive toward Kercher. Even Giacomo Silenzi, Kercher's love interest who lived downstairs, testified the two girls had a "normal friendship". Not a single person testified that they ever heard a cross word between them or a negative comment or complaint made by Knox regarding Kercher. Patrick Lumumba is the source of the "Knox was jealous" of and "competing" with Kercher. But under sworn testimony when asked what he knew of the girls' relationship, he answered "Only that they were friends and nothing more." 3) "She was a spolied girl" Again, this is not based on evidence. A "spoiled girl" doesn't work 3 jobs in order to pay her way to study in Perugia. Nor does a "spoiled girl" work at a job she disliked during that time in order to pay her way. 4) "the number of times she retracted & Re-issued her statement, each time different from the last was a telling act." Exactly what "statement" that she "she retracted & Re-issued" a "number of times" are you referring to and how were they "different"? 4) "Amanda has made the whole thing about herself!" What evidence is there that Knox is a narcissist other than your belief she's guilty? 5) "Narcissists are always the victim & never ever the guilty party" Again, based on your own belief that she is guilty. If innocent, then she is most definitely another victim of an injustice, including spending four years in a foreign prison for crime she didn't commit and who is still being publicly defamed, insulted, slut-shamed, and accused of being a murderer. Her life and those of her children are also being threatened by ugly, hateful, and ignorant people. 6) "( i know very well as my 40yr old daughter is a high narcissist & life with them takes stainless steel temprament & nerves of a Ninja fighter!)" Then isn't it odd that a "narcissist" like Knox has such loving, caring, and loyal family, friends, and husband? Or do you think that fighting for and standing with her during years of trials that decimated their lives emotionally and financially is because they all have a "stainless steel temprament & nerves of a Ninja fighter"? 7) The rest of your post is nothing but an ignorant and judgmental rant based solely on your own guilt-based bias. NOT ONCE did you mention any actual EVIDENCE presented in any of the trials. It was all about YOUR "feelings and beliefs". Frankly, it's people like you that are a perfect example of why Knox IS a victim. The irony is, that for all your claims of Knox's narcissism, your entire post is an excellent example of narcissism. The nut doesn't fall far from the tree, apparently.

@itallia666

4 ай бұрын

@@mytrip6991 Wow! That puts a totally different spin on everything! I dont know much about this case to be perfectly honest with you. At the time of this happening i was nursing my very ill mother who was suffering a terrible cancer & didn't have much time to hear about how all of this case was progressing. I was worn out & exhausted & had my young children to care for Too. My comment was based purely on Casefiles evidence & conjecture & opinions. I appreciate you taking the time & care to tell me about the botched police work Its not often CF slip up & don't give what was reported & what actually happened! I did wonder that they found part of Merediths bra fastener under a bedroom rug, 6 WEEKS after the murder! That was very strange! If they had done a competent job There shouldnt have been a speck remaining unidentified! Thank you again for putting me straight & giving me the real low down. You did a great job of setting out What happened in clear & precise Paragraphs! Grateful thanks Peace 🇬🇧👧

@mytrip6991

4 ай бұрын

@@itallia666 Sorry I was harsh at times but I get so tired of the misinformation that so many people believe and repeat about this case. I do understand about taking care of your mother. I, too, helped cared for my parents who both died from cancer several years apart. I also had a young child during my father's illness...a horribly disfiguring cancer and requiring many surgeries.

@itallia666

4 ай бұрын

@@mytrip6991 Aww, Thank you for that & i totally understand your ire & frustration! I get that way too, imcompetance & lazy attitude by L.E. makes my blood boil & i let loose when i shouldnt but, you just have to get it out or blow a fuse which is bad for your health! Im retired now but i worked in the psychology sector for a while then took another course to work within our Prison/ Offender Evaluation & Assessment system. At the time there was a resurgence of understanding the criminal mind while offering rehabilitation programmes. I was initially an Intervention Facilitator ( fancy pre woke wording !) Its daunting at times working & Speaking with violent offenders & even after years you can still be shocked! I will say, sometimes these offenders are extremely intelligent & have often criticised police & the dumbwits Who completely obliterate clues & make idiotic mistakes, cover up their incompetence with fake evidence... My Word! You would choke with sheer anger if i told you some of the things i found out about police investigations! Even to the point of contacting " The Bad Boys" criminal fraternity to HELP them cover something up or ask advice to how to go about investigations! One guy i used to speak to who had almost served his sentence & was very erudite & was a meticulous planner & had studied multiple jail courses of education Told me that half of the police force should be sitting when he had been! So many innocents framed for crimes because the cops were in cahoots with the real offenders Same old, same old. But also people, just ordinary citizens trying to cope with work & family have been deliberately set up BECAUSE of police incompetance & cock ups... So YES! I totally understand your Fury! Its good to let it rip or it rips your insides out! Feel free to blast out to me anytime you want to wring someones neck, i shall not be offended at all I enjoy intelligent debate & will always listen to anyones POV when its well researched & reasons given are constructive Written without fancy arguement, simply stated, conpact & with clarity! Such as your comments, i really was impressed & educated to the new info you made me aware of. What would good investigation & Summarization be without the passion of anger & outbursts We sometimes have to be harsh to make people sit up & listen! Im also with you on the toll it takes on your whole body & soul when caring for a terminally ill loved one. Its sobering to realise our vitality & lust for life isnt immortal.. Sending you genuine blessings & Good cheer, im not very religious in a churchy way but i have faith & hope & lots of love to spare. Stay safe, speak your truth & never stop asking questions Peace 🇬🇧👧

The only thing I'm sure of is this case is incomplete. I'm willing to bet that in ten or twenty years we will discover there were elements that were never made public.

the fact that the guy who did this only got 16 years is insane.

@ninedaysjane2466

4 ай бұрын

That's the true injustice here, but too many people are obsessed with proving Amanda Knox guilty.

@rockstarofredondo

4 ай бұрын

The fact that the Italian police and courts tried to cover up that he actually did it and went after 2 innocent bystanders is what’s most insane.

@lisajohnson1974

10 күн бұрын

​@@rockstarofredondoJust curious. Are you Amanda Knox?

The return of the king nvm its broken lol nvm it's fixed

What a mess. Rest in peace Meredith 🕊

I don't Know wether Amanda Knox is guilty or not. But I know that when this heinous crime happened in the house where she was living the first thing she did when speaking to the police was blaming a black person she knew in Perugia that had absolutely nothing to do with the crime and now she is even an 'activist for the wrongly accused'. This is ridicoluos beyond any reasonable doubt.

@loredanadincu4300

4 ай бұрын

I thought it was someone else with the same name when I searched and saw the word activist next to it. What a joke. And that person that supposedly killed Meredith couldn't have entered the house without a key , or let by someone with a key in. They said from the beginning that there was no forced entry and that the window that was broken was smashed after the killing took place. The other tenants had solid alibies, and I doubt Meredith would have left the dude in like he supposedly said. By how Amanda reacted in the beginning, it's obvious she knew more than she let out.

@laural3738

4 ай бұрын

@@loredanadincu4300 yes, she acted like she was hiding the truth since the beginning. And it's not just a story that was made up by the media, these are facts documented in police reports and interrogation. The hypothesis of the defense that Raffaele's DNA was transferred to the bra clasp by contamination because he was the one that smashed down Meredith door and due to the movement of people in the room in the following days is far less likely than the prosecutors hypothesis that DNA was here because Raffaele actually touched the clasp to stretch it behind the back of Meredith before cutting it with the knife, that also explains why the DNA was inside the bra on the clasp and not outside. The bra wasn't normally undressed, it was cut with a knife that was put between Meredith's back and the bra and then pulled strongly cutting the bra.

@suzannah991

4 ай бұрын

​@@loredanadincu4300oh lord 🙄

@loredanadincu4300

4 ай бұрын

@suzannah991 What's up with the rolling eyes emoji . If you have a problem with my comment, you should have come with real arguments in the reply you posted, not with puerile stuff.

@simon01ize

4 ай бұрын

There is overwhelming evidence that shows that all three people, Guede, Knox, and Sollecito were there when the crime happened. Forensic evidence in regard to DNA, via blood and other materials mixed with Meredith's. A big clean up was done, lies upon lies, etc. In the end a lot of money and a big PR campaign that involved politicians from the US got Knox out. Sollecito had more than enough connections. Guede was definitely there, but may not have killed her.

So many suspects....and only one culprit.

This entire case is such a cluster fuck

The Italian police will never pay enough for the damage they did to Amanda and Raphaele, but specially to Amanda. To this day she has to hear people saying “they have their doubts about her” even though she had jackshit to do with anything

@jordanpost2411

Ай бұрын

Why did she claim her boss did it then?

@lilovs9952

Ай бұрын

@@jordanpost2411 did she? Where? Claimed her boss did it?

@davidlister7214

22 күн бұрын

@@lilovs9952 Under police questioning when she was first pulled in. She told them her boss at the bar she worked at, Patrick Lumumba, had done it. He later sued for slander and the verdict was recently upheld in Florence. Don't fall for the slick PR campaigns Amanda Knox runs. You don't randomly get charged with murder. There were other girls living in the same apartment and their names never got dragged into it. At the very best she had nothing to do with the actual crime and tried to fit up other people for it when the heat was on her. There was plenty of evidence that Knox and Sollecito knew more about what happened than they let on.

🎉🎉WELCOME BACK🎉🎉 SOOO EXCITED RIGHT NOW!!! MANY THANKS❤❤

I remember this tragic case because Meredith was from the UK ....really sad story ....Amanda was and is innocent ...Italy is an amazing country - BUT the COPS are corrupt and useless - I got pulled over in Rome by a couple of cops who initially spoke Italian with me ...as SOON as they found out I was from the UK ...They took my license and disappeared for 20 mins before returning with a 60 Euro fine ... It went down hill from there ...I eventually got away from these vile corrupt people .. luckily it was not an on the spot fine :) - Needless to say I did NOT pay :) ... They got my home address from the car hire company ..and kept sending fines ...but by then I had cancelled my credit card :) - So they can whistle for the fine :) - If you ever drive in Italy ...be VERY CAREFUL .. They have hidden camera's specifically located to - ENTRAP unsuspecting drivers ...especially - TOURIST

Happy happy you're back, Mum, and i listen to your podcast she kept asking when your back lol

Amazing quality in-depth, He killed her she never got justice evidence is so clear he acted alone. Yet he’s one walking free with barely any mention. I won’t insult Meredith or other inicent suspects so cruelly treated by mentioning his name. He knows what he did if you haven’t at he’d his prison interview I highly recommend you do. It’s very telling he paints very clear picture of what happened minus his lies.

I still have doubts about Knox. Or maybe I just don't like her personality that much.

@christopherhorn1161

3 ай бұрын

Literally have DNA evidence of who did it...not Amanda

@alexbennet4195

23 күн бұрын

@@christopherhorn1161they literally concluded that he didn’t act alone?

I remembet this in the news.

Where have you been, missed you Matey 👍

This case is complicated.

@mytrip6991

Ай бұрын

Not really. It's a pretty open and shut case: all the forensic evidence in the bedroom points to only one person: Rudy Guede. If the police had done a competent investigation before jumping to erroneous conclusions and then becoming tunnel-visioned and fixated on Knox and Sollecito, the only person going to trial would have been Guede. Instead, they doubled down and refused to admit they'd got it wrong when they arrested Knox, Sollecito and Lumumba because they were more interested in their Bella Figura (saving face).

@KathleenCalhoun-em6ys

Ай бұрын

@@mytrip6991 I know, but there was a lot to listen to.

Thank you for the trigger warning, I'll watch a different video of yours and just give this one a like. Really appreciate it 🩷

Then who threw the rock and why?

@mytrip6991

4 ай бұрын

Rudy Guede threw it from the parking parapet which was a few feet directly across from the window. It reflected a break-in at a law office earlier (second story rock thrown through window). Guede was caught by the police red-handed with a cell phone and laptop stolen from that office in his backpack just a few days before the murder.

1:20:45 She didn't buy underwear,she bought lingerie homie

Wow, a rich kid who could go on one of those high school trips to Europe. I used to envy them so much.

@mytrip6991

2 ай бұрын

She wasn't a rich kid. She worked 3 jobs to pay for her study in Italy.

@lilianevanfrankrijk7490

2 ай бұрын

@@mytrip6991 She did not work three jobs and attend high school simultaneously to pay for the trip sponsored by the high school. I'm not going to listen again but I had the impression she was in 10th grade only. You have to be 16 to get a real job. And three part time jobs would preclude attending high school at the same time in middle class America. If you have a job one summer and another job the next summer and a weekend job during the school year you don't say you worked three jobs or earn that money; another kid who changed employers twice each summer and worked alternate weekends for two stores could truthfully say she worked six jobs. From the narration it sounded as if she went on one of those trips during high school and had already been to Europe with her family before that, being given her own menu by a waiter. I maintain the family had serious excess money and paid for her high school trip to Italy and wasn't she a lucky girl!

@mytrip6991

2 ай бұрын

​@@lilianevanfrankrijk7490 1. "She did not work three jobs and attend high school simultaneously to pay for the trip sponsored by the high school. I'm not going to listen again but I had the impression she was in 10th grade only." I never said she was still in high school when she worked. She wasn't. Knox graduated from Seattle Preparatory High School in June, 2005. She turned 19 in July. She went to Italy in the summer of 2007, age 20, after attending one year at UW. She worked the 3 jobs the winter of 2006-2007 and saved $7800. From her book, pg 10: “I’ve done all the math. I can pay for my own food and the extra expenses,” I said. “Remember I worked three jobs this past winter? I put almost all of it in the bank. I’ve got seventy-eight hundred dollars saved up.” 2. "From the narration it sounded as if she went on one of those trips during high school and had already been to Europe with her family before that, being given her own menu by a waiter." If you listen again, starting at :46, they were talking about Meredith, not Amanda. 3. "I maintain the family had serious excess money and paid for her high school trip to Italy and wasn't she a lucky girl!" There was no 'high school trip to Italy' for Amanda. That was Meredith. Amanda's family was middle class.

One day the Truth will come out……Both AK and RS are guilty AF, They Could have prevented the Crime

There were so many factual errors in under 8 minutes of this recording that I stopped listening to it. 1) 4:53: Amanda was not "22", she had turned 20 the previous July. 2) 5:33: Meredith did not attend the Univ. for Foreigners; she attended the Univ. of Perugia. Knox attended the Univ. for Foreigners. 3) 10:33: Amanda did not see the blood on the bath mat before taking the shower as claimed here. Amanda reported seeing 3 tiny drops of dried blood on the faucet (not in the sink) and took a shower. She only saw the watery bloody footprint on the bath mat when she stepped out of the shower onto the mat. (See her testimony) 4) 11:27: It wasn't Filomena who "was worried that Meredith might have cut herself and gone out to seek medical care accidentally leaving the front door open behind her", but her friend, Paola Grande, who suggested that to Filomena. (see Filomena's interview with Mignini on Dec 3, 2007 pg. 40) 5) 12:42: "This time Amanda told her someone's been in your room. They smashed your window but it's bizarre it doesn't look like they've taken anything." Amanda never told Filomena that. It was Raffaele who told the police that because Amanda didn't see anything obvious taken, including a valuable camera and laptop in plain sight in Filomena's room. Edited to correct time to "under 8 minutes" in the first line. .

@honeybadger3570

4 ай бұрын

If you stop listening at 7 minutes why do you continue asshatery as far as 12+ minutes? 😒

@mytrip6991

4 ай бұрын

​@@honeybadger3570 I meant to say I stopped after finding so many errors between minutes 4:53 and 12:42. Does that change my point? Apparently, you consider pointing out factual errors as being 'asshatery' (sic). Instead, why not disprove my claims they were factual errors? I can prove every single one of them is a factual error with quotes and citations Can you do the same? If not, then I suggest you stop with the asshattery.

@honeybadger3570

4 ай бұрын

@@mytrip6991 Don't manipulate my words, I have no issue with corrections of errors... *the condescending, insulting, rude manner in which you did it is the asshatery* 📢 "I meant to say..." 🤣🤣🤣 oooooohhhh okay so _you're allowed_ accidental errors but _the creator isn't_ smdh I see how you roll now... nice hypocrisy right there

@honeybadger3570

4 ай бұрын

@@mytrip6991 📢 "I meant to say...." 🤣🤣🤣 Ooooohhh so you're allowed accidental errors but the creator isn't? Nice hyp⁰crisy right there, glass house. Factual corrections bother me none - it's the added the rŭde, insŭlting and cøndescending attitude that is unnecessary

@mytrip6991

4 ай бұрын

@@honeybadger3570 Here's more "asshatery" (sic) for you from this video: 1)13:07- "at 12:35 p.m. two officers from the postal police arrived at number seven via Dela pergola" This is what the postal police claimed, but the court records show that they arrived AFTER the 112 calls had been concluded at 12:55: the second 112 call at 12:54:39 lasted 57 seconds (Sollecito's cellphone log) so the postal police could NOT have arrived before then at 12:35. Why did the narrator not mention this? Hellmann Report: "There has been much discussion on whether the call to 112 happened before or after the arrival of the Police, with it having been hypothesized by the Public Minister that the call to the Carabinieri at 112 had been made on seeing the arrival of the Police, just to validate the notion [tesi] of their innocence. Except that even the Corte di Assise of first level, on the basis of the testimony given by the on-duty Police personnel and of the times reproduced from the logs, arrived at the conclusion that these calls had been made before the arrival of the Police and unaware of their imminent arrival. 2) 14:16- " but strangely valuable items such as a laptop, gold jewelry, a digital camera and designer sunglasses sat untouched out in the open" No gold jewelry was 'out in the open'. Filomena's jewelry was in box in her nightstand: QUESTION - and then the jewelry was kept where? ANSWER - In a bedside jewelry case in the nightstand. (Romanelli testimony Feb 3, 2009)

Interesting story 😮

Every time I think my countries legally system is f-ed, I listen to stuff like this.

This is infuriating

@no_peace

20 күн бұрын

They literally made all that up. When they got proven wrong they made up a new thing. It's disgusting

That someone could have used gloves 🤧

I must say i find it deeply inapproriate, that among the sources included is Knox's book, which if you do your research contains over 500 lies, among them the so called interrogation that never happened. She offered up information of her own accord, and was given a pen and paper. Of course the lies then continued, and haven't stopped since. I am suprised because Casefile is a decent podcast.

@ninedaysjane2466

4 ай бұрын

It is a decent podcast. The host does *real* research. It's creepy how obsessed you are with Amanda Knox. She's not going to be guilty no matter how much you want her to be.

@naomiledger1374

4 ай бұрын

And you are the authority on Knox's alleged lies how exactly???

@rockstarofredondo

4 ай бұрын

@@madisonjewell7017the complaint is happening because the creator is not piling onto Knox like the haters demand.

@mytrip6991

4 ай бұрын

To the pro-guilt, anything that Knox says that they don't BELIEVE is a 'lie' including your claim that "She offered up information of her own". The pro-guilt allow for no simple mistakes, no confused or imperfect memory; everything is a 'lie'. As for being given pen and paper, that never happened, and no interrogator ever claimed that. In fact, the police typed up the two statements in Italian and had her sign them. There is no record of the interrogation either written or recorded other than those two signed statements. There was no record of what questions were asked or what Knox answered typed up at the time of the interrogation.

My work nights are complete once again 🩶

Amanda comes across as flaky, very flaky

@mytrip6991

Ай бұрын

And?

❤❤❤❤❤