Hey guys - one quick clarification about something that's getting a few comments. In the video I say that the PC was 2-4 times faster than its competitors at tasks important to businesses. Keep in mind that I was not comparing clock cycle vs. clock cycle of the CPU alone against only certain other CPU's (I showed more than CPU speed in the chart); I was comparing overall performance in real-world tasks. As we all know even today, there's more to a computer than just its CPU, and the fact that the PC had a very advanced graphics subsystem, support for massive amounts of RAM (for the day) that reduced or eliminated the PC's need to access a disk while within an application, a fast system bus, math co-processor support and a faster floppy and hard drive interface than its competitors, made it much faster overall than those machines at tasks important to businesses (for example, large spreadsheets or relational databases). Of course, that doesn't mean that some of the machines on my list weren't better at certain other tasks - I'm a big Atari 8 bit and Apple II fan, personally (and am an Apple II owner since 1985), and would choose either of those machines to play games on before the early PC. In fact, I actually made that choice - I chose my Apple IIc at a time when the PC AT was already available!

@Scalibq

5 жыл бұрын

Advanced graphics subsystem? Not at all, the PC was by far the most primitive on the market with its MDA or CGA options. It had memory, FPU and expansion options going for it, but at its base it was quite an inefficient machine.

@asgerms

5 жыл бұрын

Bohemiq : You are thinking about games. We are talking about serious computing. Try working 40 hours a week in front of an early 80s micro (not a kid playing games for fun), and you will be begging for an MDA with a smooth 350 line display. All other systems used 200 lines, which gets sore on the eyes. Furthermore, allready in 82 most of us switched the MDA to a cheap Hercules card, and now had 720x348 flicker-free graphics. Not until the mac (1984, 512x348) and Atari ST (1985, 640x400) was this rivaled on monochrome. Not even the amiga's could do this; 200 lines or headache inducing interlacing. For colors, try doing 80-columns green text on a magenta background and all early systems but the PC will absolutely vomit. This is due to it's RGB connection. By the time Atari/Amiga sorta caught up, PC's allready had EGA with 16-colors in flickerfree 640x350, which no other system could do. If you were really serious, the PGA adapter gave you 640x480 in 256 colors from a palette of 4096, with GPU acceleration in 1984! For business, it's not about animation and entertainment. It's about having alot of screen real estate and a sharp/clear image presenting your data. The author of the video is correct that the PC was way ahead in this respect; and in many other ways that gamers are oblivious about.

@Scalibq

5 жыл бұрын

Games? No, I'm a graphics programmer, and I am thinking about the basic technology. Also, you have to be more specific. The high resolution only counts for MDA, which had the downsides of being text-only and monochrome. CGA only had 200-line modes, so was no better in that respect than its competitors. Aside from that, both MDA and CGA were severely limited and slow, compared to the alternatives. Hence I find the characterization of 'very advanced graphics subsystem' to be woefully inaccurate. Comparisons between EGA or PGA versus stock Amiga and Atari ST machines is also completely missing the point, given the huge price difference between the systems, and their intended markets. You would sooner have to compare them against workstation-class machines, and then IBM again is not looking all that spectacular. Besides, other platforms also supported expansions for graphics. Displaying text or simple graphics was basically ALL you could do with CGA. It did not support double-buffering, did not have any kind of raster interrupts, no support for custom character sets, no hardware sprites (not even a simple hardware mouse cursor), no scrolling, no blitting, nothing. All things that were supported on most 8-bit machines, even ones that were orders of magnitude cheaper than the PC. CGA is nothing more than a dumb framebuffer. EGA and VGA are a bit more sophisticated, but still lacked sprites and other features (or had a very limited implementation of them) compared to their contemporaries.

@asgerms

5 жыл бұрын

See? You go on-and-on about speed, raster interrupts, double buffering, sprites, tiles,....*everything* that has to do with animation and games, and exactly what the PC was *not* about!

@Scalibq

5 жыл бұрын

No, you are jumping to conclusions, and fail to understand the context. I was responding to the above message, where the OP stated '...the fact that the PC had a very advanced graphics subsystem'. This is what I was responding to. 'What the PC is about' is not the context. Aside from that, you also fail to understand that the things I mention have applications that go well beyond animation and games, and certainly fit professional applications. For example, the PC's poor graphics subsystem also made it trail behind when GUIs and WYSIWYG became mainstream in the mid-80s. As I said, the PC is a very inefficient design, and when you wanted a GUI, you had to do a lot of bruteforce processing on the CPU, where many competitors had much faster, more elegant solutions for showing mouse cursors, drawing lines, moving areas around on the screen, drawing custom fonts etc. Aside from that, there's also of course a professional market where graphics are very important, such as CAD/CAM and computer animation. Again, if the PC really did have a 'very advanced graphics subsystem', it would have supported the various features I had mentioned, and would have been a viable alternative. But the fact is that it didn't, and it wasn't (even though IBM attempted to enter professional graphics markets with the PGC, 8514/A and XGA, it failed horribly everytime, as evidenced by the fact that virtually no software exists that even supports these standards). Because it was exactly what the PC was not about.

I'm a former electronics engineer who was among a handful of people who, back in the early 1980s, had designed the first IBM-compatible microcomputer system (now termed a "personal computer"). I prepared by studying the circuitry of IBM PC and while not all was apparent I had deduced a lot of things from it. It wasn't an exact copy by any means but the machine worked and designed with higher speed, higher memory, and more expansion slots (like an XT version). In those early days engineers had to design from scratch with hundreds of digital circuit chips, (everything from the motherboard, DRAM interface, hard disk drive, etc) , unlike today's much easier VLSI (Very large Scale Integration). The product went into high production and was distributed to 7-11 stores throughout the US. There was no parade for me, only a big recognition clap from my boss and fellow engineers. They didn't know that I didn't do it entirely out of the blue. These days in retirement I tune pianos.

@nadeemshaikh7863

9 ай бұрын

You probably worked for Compaq?

@AndresRuiz2035

9 ай бұрын

@@nadeemshaikh7863 I don't doubt it!

@FlatBroke612

Ай бұрын

Oh yeah? Well my dad works at Nintendo!

My father bought an IBM 5150 when it first came out and we still have it to this day.

@skril733

5 жыл бұрын

Hell yeah. Although he did update a few thing like getting an EGA card, maxing out the memory, and replacing the monitor with an Amdek Color II.

@flavortown3781

5 жыл бұрын

You got you probably 20k worth of hardwares worth

@NaokisRC

5 жыл бұрын

20k? Is this like the 100k priced Space Invaders cabinets? Sure, they have value but no way is it 20k...

@evetsnitram8866

5 жыл бұрын

This model PC actually inspired Van Halen to name an album after it.

@sonikpeakstudio6093

5 жыл бұрын

And there's a guitar amp from Peavy called "5150" as well

My Dad still has his IBM 5100 with the printer that came with it from 1975 - it cost $36,000 and the printer cost about the same. To this day it is still fully functional.

My Dad worked for IBM starting in the 60s . Started in working on mainframes and in the late 70s was promoted to systems engineer. they gave him a 5150 . He also wrote manuals for them.

I've watched a few IBM PC retrospectives, and this would have to be the best. Very well presented and paced, with content, asides, and comparisons not found elsewhere.

@geoffreykeane4072

5 жыл бұрын

William Kulich I agree, I remember the issues in the mid 80s on compatibility and what we had to do to get around it.

@dtriplett03

5 жыл бұрын

@Adelaine Delabin I agree))👽

@Clavichordist

5 жыл бұрын

@@geoffreykeane4072 I remember that as well. How many of those clone companies and products from some of the big players disappeared overnight? Eagle Computer, Data General's DG-series, Panasonic, DEC, Wang, and so many others. DEC caught on to the compatibility thing too late, and Wang never got it. Sadly both are gone now due to many reasons but this was among them.

@vapourmile

4 жыл бұрын

It's good because the bulk of the other retrospectives are made by eternal teenagers who are only looking back at it to bash it.

@dryan8377

4 жыл бұрын

I agree completely. I lived and worked through all of the years presented. I spent $2500 for a Trash 80 model 3. 48k ram, with dual disk drives.

A few historical notes: The design team at Boca Raton initially studied the successful micro computers on the market to co-develop the their marketing strategy along with the product design parameters. the design target was a desktop computer that would appeal as many markets as possible, and their design showed this philosophy At the time the CP/m operating system dominated business computing and a large library of third party software. CP/M ran primarily on inlet 8-bit processors (8080, 8085) and some 8080 compatible chips from Zilog (Z-80). Intel had introduce the 8086 design which was source code compatible with the older 8080 to simplify the porting existing 8-bit software to the 16-bit processor. However, the cost of memory chips would have greatly increased the price so they decided to use the 8088 CPU, an Intel transitional design that was completely machine code compatible with the 8086, but used an 8-bit data path. The PC design team noted that computers in the home and educational markets were expandable, with the most successful computers in the market sector have a large variety of third party hardware, so in a break from IBM's tradition closed business model, they specifications and designs to encourage third-party hardware development, but decided to use copyrighted bios ROMS to provide legal protection against copycat (clone) machines. The idea was to use a propriety OS that would only work after authenticating the bios roms. It's fairly certain that IBM intended on purchasing CP/M86 from digital research, but when they went to make the deal, Digital Research would not agree to IBM's NDA clause in their licensing. However, an IBM executive had learned of the existence of a clone of CPM86 through back channels owned by a small software company calling itself Micro-Soft and a deal was made for a version of the 86-dos operating system with the authentication code to be named PC-DOS Micro-Soft's co-founder, Bill Gates, whose father and grandfather were corporate lawyers took advantage in a huge loophole in contract law and after providing PC-DOS to IBM and renamed and produced a modified version of 86-dos without the authentication code called MS-DOS For the home market, a non disk PC would boot into Microsoft Basic from rom, and rom basic programs could be save and loaded with a standard portable cassette recorder, but there was no way to use the cassette port or even use the cassette basic program after adding a floppy controller. The original base price of the PC did not include a display adapter.For home use the color graphics adapter was offered for use with a tv, and for business a monochrome monitor and the business graphics adapter was offered

Great video, a really nice presentation. I'm glad you spent a little time praising the PC's keyboard. It's easy to forget now, but at the time, keyboard quality on personal computers varied greatly, and having a keyboard that just "felt right" was a key selling point for me and a lot of other people. The PC's keyboard was a delight to type on (as was the IBM Selectric's, which you also mentioned). It was just so _satisfying._

@jn1mrgn

Жыл бұрын

Some systems of the time had so-so keyboards, but it was not unusual to see awful bubble switch stuff. And the disaster that some PET models called a keyboard.

@kevinray3229

Жыл бұрын

By far the best made keyboard of the day for a PC.

@douglasb5046

5 ай бұрын

I still have my PS2 keyboard. Nothing beats it’s tactile feel!

I worked in the computer lab of my university from 1994 until graduation. We had a 5150 working as the print server/spooler for the whole lab. Somehow, it was able to handle print requests from banks of both Classic and PowerPC Macs, and from Windows computers (probably 60 in total), and I never remember it once crashing or having any kind of mechanical failure. That 5150 was the first computer we'd start up in the lab early in the morning, and the last one that we would shut down at the end of each night. It wasn't even upgraded with a hard drive (and the required higher-wattage PSU). That was the only computer type in the whole lab building that I never remember having run into a problem with. I wish the hardware and software will still made to that standard.

@ModernClassic

5 жыл бұрын

Yeah, I don't really know of a *desktop* you can buy at this point that's built to the same level of toughness. I do plan on hopefully eventually doing a comparison of the very last standard desktop that IBM made (they still make server kits and such that don't really qualify) with this 5150 where I'll talk about whatever differences I find. I strongly suspect that build quality will be one of them, even back in 2005. Not sure when that video will happen - the particular machine I'm looking for, an IBM-made 8422 A51p, is not very common at all.

@DOSv622

5 жыл бұрын

Was that a network Novell Netware LAN? My college at the time had really nice Digital Equipment Corporation 486 desktops in most of their computer classrooms and labs and in each room they had an old PC or PC XT with multiple parallel port cards installed with 2 dot matrix printers and a HP LaserJet II or III connected. No hard disk on the PC, just a DOS boot disk, with the Novel Netware client and the novel pserve.exe on it all scripted to do it’s thing on boot via autoexec.bat. A very ingenious way of utilizing old hardware.

@JMacQ77

5 жыл бұрын

Planned obsolescence seems to be the modern paradigm. There will never be another "5150" level of build quality. Instead, all of us hope that our phones will survive another year. And when they don't, a shiny and new one is presented for our purchase, or lease.

@JMacQ77

5 жыл бұрын

Yep, we used Netware. The 5150 worked wonderfully as our print spooler. Most of that old hardware rarely crashed, but I had to deliver bad news to many fellow students who experienced "sad Mac" screens, and Microsoft's patented blue screens. "Sorry man, your finals paper is history..." That old IBM tank never did so much as hiccup, at least when I was on duty.

@psdaengr911

5 жыл бұрын

Netware rocked. Also, I rarely experienced a problem with a PC clone that wasn't caused by Micro Soft. IBM made great keyboards and cases, but had a hard time keeping up with clone makers who didn't care who made the parts as long as they kept getting faster.

Fresh out of college with a degree in computer science I wrote an application for Estate Planning that analyzed inheritance taxes, multiple strategies, outcomes, and other factors targeted at high net worth customers for a local insurance agent for Mass Mutual, the insurance agent then positioned this application and some extensions to Dunn and Bradstreet. My first paid gig as a programmer and all on a brand new IBM PC which I never had access to a desktop computer, I had to learn the OS and IBM Basic language. Dunn and Bradstreet loved the app and acquired the insurance agent and his company with the estate planning app. I had gas money and something to put on my resume and made my car loan payments.

This is a very well-researched and well-produced video, definitely going to subscribe!

Back in 1986, I was contracted as a design engineer to design a PC-like machine for Norand, a business machine company based in Cedar Rapids, Iowa. Back then we digital design engineers had to design a system with 100s of chips together to make a working electronic machine. Today, everything is integrated into one big chip called a VLSI. I hadn't done that before although I did quite a few microprocessor-based systems and each is different. Fortunately, a software guy working next to me happen to have the original manual for the 1981 PC which detailed all the inside digital circuitry involved. That saved my day. I examined the circuitry and soon learned how the PC was put together. I then designed a similar PC (using a different set of chips altogether, not a copy) based on the principles I learned from IBM's original blueprint. My boss patted my back and said "Well done. I'm impressed. You truly know PC design." I didn't, I just borrowed off ideas from someone else. I didn't bother to tell them that. What for? My fat paycheck wouldn't be impressive if I did. With having claim to be a PC designer on my resume, I got other plum jobs thereafter.

Great video. Thanks for making this. I used an original IBM PC although it had 640K memory, at one of my first jobs in 1984. It was a great era to live through.

What a wonderful piece documenting the origination of the PC! Bravo!

8:49 "Intel... fast and cheap" Hard to imagine

@theforerunnerreclaimer

2 жыл бұрын

Until 2017 it was true, and now they are recovering

Very nice video! Clear and well-paced, great video quality. Thanks for doing this!

Excellent accounting of the history of this groundbreaking, historic computer. I was there through it all and everything you laid out is exactly as it occurred. Awesome job!

A modern classic indeed. My early career experience exposed me to the IBM PC architecture. While employed at NCR 1978-1984 I worked on their PC XT clone as well as a 3270 plug-compatible emulation system. The opportunity was there because IBM couldn't keep up with demand for the products. NCR separated themselves in the PC clone market by using amber text screens and DIN-standard low profile keyboards, which were excellent. I remember purchasing an NCR PC clone before leaving the company in 1984 for the employee price of $1500. Great video, thanks for the memories!

@shorttimer874

Жыл бұрын

I really liked amber screens. I got one from Gorilla when I updated my Apple ][ Plus with a 80 column card.

@pedrob3953

6 күн бұрын

Funny, NCR and IBM come a long way. Thomas Watson Sr. went to IBM (then CTR) after being fired from NCR. What we know today as "IBM culture" was originally NCR corporate culture brought to IBM by Watson Sr.

Great video. It brings back very fond memories for me as I was a PC specialist for IBM New Zealand back in the 80's. Although being trained on the PC Jr, New Zealand never released the product to the local market. Hurrah! We, along with Australia and Japan, got the IBM Japan developed PC JX. This was a much better designed version of the PC Jr, although not much better! It didn't last long. I actually received the first ever PC XT into the country and I can remember saying to one of my colleagues: "A 10 MB hard disk! No one will ever fill that up." How wrong was I!

Well done and narrated video, better than most I've seen, thank you, the nostalgia is what I need to put a smile on my face, even a tear to my eye. hope to see more.

I really enjoyed watching this well made episode! Great information communicated in a well organized manner. Well done historical!

Thank you very much for mentioning me in the description. Few people do it on KZread even if they use other people's material.

@ModernClassic

5 жыл бұрын

I do try to give credit when I know where something came from. Hopefully I didn't miss any credits in this video.

Very well done videos. Thanks for the content.

Great Documentary! Thanks for all the time, and effort and research. it was pleasant to watch! Thanks!

Fantastic story, extremely well put together. I'm sure you put considerable time into this documentary, and it absolutely shows! I really enjoyed this, and look forward to your future review of the machine itself!

@ModernClassic

5 жыл бұрын

Thank you! This video, and all of my long, scripted videos like this, do take me quite a bit of time. My next few vids will hopefully be quicker!

When I started working the company got 2 IBM's, now I am almost gonna retire ... this vid gives me good memories ...

Excellent video - brings back great memories! Thanks.

Really well written history of the PC. Best I've come across on KZread.

This was really well done! Props! I grew up with these systems as I am sure a lot of other people here did. I liked how you told the story behind the IBM instead of just talking about the hardware for example.

Excellent video. Very interesting. Earned a subscription. Kudos.

I find this so fascinating, though I was not alive I love how they look like a 80's sify machine.

Excellent and balanced discussion of the history and legacy of the IBM-PC - really love it's comprehensive coverage and editing :)

Nicely told. I got my first computer in 1980 which triggered a keen interest in the industry so I watched all of these developments as they were happening. This was a nice trip down memory lane!

Memories... I was there for (almost) the whole ride - my first computer was a Mod I Level 2 TRS-80 with 4K of RAM. What IBM brought to the table was legitimacy. What had been a geek's toy, now became a legitimate business machine.

@TheOriginalRick

4 жыл бұрын

That was why it took a while for the clones to catch on. No one in business would ever get dinged by the bosses for buying an IBM branded computer.

@rahb1

4 жыл бұрын

"What IBM brought to the table was legitimacy. What had been a geeks toy, now became a legitimate business machine." Only because of the overpriced logo. All of the other options at the time were far better priced for their much better performance and functionality.

@TheOriginalRick

4 жыл бұрын

@@rahb1 At that time no manager ever got fired by telling the boss, " I just bought us an IBM computer"

@tarajoe07

3 жыл бұрын

@@rahb1 This machine was well ahead of the competition for business use.

Speaking as someone who has been involved in IT professionally since the early 80s (and a hobbyist before that), I found your video very interesting. Thanks.

Awesome video. Loved the honest, and factual information. I used to teach IT for high school students. I would have loved to have shown this video. Keep up the awesome work dude.

This was a superb video. Subscribed, liked and added it to my favorites. Way to go.

I wish IBM still made machines for the average consumer. They really did care a lot about build quality, which is something that some other OEMs really should start doing.

Amazing job thank you so much

Thanks for the stroll down memory lane. I worked for IBM for 37 years. My first PC was a PC XT running DOS. Then a PC AT running DOS but with green screen mainframe access. Then a PS2/70 and then a PS2/80 and an L40/SX all running OS/2. We finally switched to laptops with Windows. It was quite a ride.

Thanks for sharing such an awesome tour through the history of the IBM PC. 😉👍

Brilliant. Thank you, sir.

I would argue that the IBM 5100 was more influential. After all, CERN needs them for their time machine!

@MrApple256

5 жыл бұрын

I was looking for this kind of comment :D

@pelgervampireduck

5 жыл бұрын

the organization is here too!. awaiting instructions! el psy kongroo!

@mebradhen

5 жыл бұрын

Okabe... The phones off, what are you rambling about

@ez45

5 жыл бұрын

No, that was the 5150. :)

@thomasandrews9355

5 жыл бұрын

Kudos for the Steins Gate reference.

Love the professional polish of your videos. Good work!

I had a lot of different IBM systems growing up (my dad was an IBMer) but the earliest I really spent much time with was an XT. So I learned a lot from this video - black, wide expansion slots? No memory count display during POST? Most people would (rightly) say these were little things but they kinda blew my mind! lol. Thanks for the great video. Really beautiful system you have there, hope you’ve gotten an IBM display for it since.

That was a very informative history lesson. Thanks for sharing. I've got some of those old IBM computers in the basement that I just never had the heart to get rid of.

@dubiouslycrisp

4 жыл бұрын

I got rid of some old computers. A decade later, I regretted it.

The best IBM PC story ever. Thank you!

Glad you mentioned the PC jr. I had one of these as a kid and used it until about the mid 90s.

What a great Synopsis of the mid 70's to early 90's...... Really enjoyed that....thank you

Very good video. Thanks!

Great video! I just picked up a full-kit 5150 on Craigslist a few weeks ago.

I am computer enthusiast, and spend so much time looking through the PC Magazine archives in Google Books. All the information you have is just pure gold...

Great video. I worked at IBM Boca from 1984 till 1994. When I started we were making PC's 24/7 you could work as much as you liked. It was a good time.

I loved the video. Lived through it. My father bought one of the first 5150s. That machine lasted forever with continuous upgrades and repairs. I'd acquire other people's dead machines and take the working from each to make new ones. The only original part, I know is original from my father, is the math co-processor.

This history is utterly fascinating because my dad had one of the original IBM XT "portable" machines which was my formative computer experience and now I am watching this on a descendant of the original PC. The keyboard I am using came with a NEC server and is obviously a direct clone of the IBM model M keyboard in layout and color. As to the PC I am using - it is running Windows 10 ( descended from MS DOS) has an Intel CPU ( a XEON X5650) has an ASUS ROG motherboard with Intel X58 chipset, all 10 year old tech but still works great - basically a mix and match of components conforming to some loose standard. If I could travel back in time to the late 70s and early 80s I would tell those early computer designers from Commodore, Atari, Apple and whoever that a successful computer has to be open and expandable and upgradeable in order to be successful as I am from the future and have seen what works. The PC lives on!

@ajax700

4 жыл бұрын

windows NT descends from many things this guy liked (not from ms-dos thank god!) en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dave_Cutler VMS, some things windows, and many many things unix. Even ms-dos is the copy of a bad copy (qdos), of a simple copy (CP/M), of UNIX. "I would tell those early computer designers from Commodore, Atari, Apple and whoever that a successful computer has to be open and expandable and upgradeable" That is mixing apples with oranges. Great advice, that is how ibm lost the PC market. Among other things. Using commodity components that competitors had not even to copy, just buy, save for the BIOS.

Lived thru those years as both a business manager and home hobbyist. Lots of memories in this video

Excellent. Well document and well written. I began my career as the IBM PC was being launched. Thanks for one of the best documentary pieces I've seen on this subject.

Good and very informative video. I am way to young to have experienced the dawn of personal computers, but I of some reason, I just cannot stop wanting to learn more about old computers...

@jovetj

4 жыл бұрын

Keep it up! Old computers are absolutely fascinating! All I could think of when he talked near the end about those RAM upgrades was the cost... hard to imagine now 1MB of RAM costing $200 USD, and that was still cheaper than in the 80s. Nice music, too!

I love this stuff ! I gobble it up. I was born in the 70's.

Started working at a large research institute in 1984...saw all systems from that moment slowly moving in, incl. the IBM Pc, the institute had 2 and 1 of these was in our room at work. This vid brings back so much happy memories ! Tnx

I was 18 in 1981 and that is the year i bought a TRS-80 Color Computer. But I recall reading all about the IBM PC in Byte magazine. My first PC/XT clone was in 1988. Great memories great review.

Great video. Brings back a lot of memories. This is the computer that drove home the point to me, that a products success is driven by more than a products capabilities. Shortly after the IBM 5020 a few competitors sprung up. One was the Victor 9000. I won't go into any detail, but in just about any metric you would like to use, it was superior to the IBM PC from a technical perspective. And it was targeted at business and ran business software. It failed, and failed hard. I was completely shocked. Later in my carrier I have seen this over and over. The best, most innovative products, are typically at the fringes and they rarely succeed. It was a hard lesson at the time and our company ended up with dozens of expensive boat anchors.

When you need more LGR and 8 bit guy, and find this channel ❤

Great video, brings back lots of memories. In 1982 i was converting Apple II+ business apps in BASIC to IBM PC. The software company i worked for got a pre release model to convert all our apple software.

I took delivery of what I was told was the first PC sold in Canada, in October 1981. It cost $3,000, had 64k of RAM and two 5 1/4" floppy disks. Hard drives didn't come along until the PC-XT, in 1983 as I recall. It was the first in Canada because I was using a CGA monitor; everyone else ordered them with IBM's monochrome monitor, which was held up pending regulatory approval. I used it to play and write primitive games, and secondarily as a word processor, with a dot-matrix printer. How far we have come. The best thing about the keyboard, or rather the architecture, was that it was totally programmable. Meaning that the OS can make that annoying caps lock key act like a regular shift key (hint to Microsoft).

2:39 The US Air Force was still using those in the 1980s. I was trained to use the Sperry UNIVAC when I was in Suppl in the USAF in the early to mid-1980s. (I was in the US Army from the mid-1980s to 1990.)

@vincentforonda7381

4 жыл бұрын

fiction

Ah, Flight Simulator - I loved that game! I started out with Adventure on the PC and Flight Sim was just mind blowing. Thanks for the history lesson!

@cosmicraysshotsintothelight

4 жыл бұрын

Not remember NetHack? That was character based. MS Flight Simulator was the top selling software (most sales) in the world for a number of years.

Fascinating. Learned a few things. Even after owning Triumph of the Nerds for the last 20 yrs. Well done.

One of the best introductions to the PC I've seen.

When I was a kid in school, our teacher was a nerd (thank God) we had access to an IBM, Apple II, TI 99 4/A and a Sinclair ZX81. Everyone fought over the TI.

@insoft_uk

4 жыл бұрын

Kenneth bet Sinclair ZX81 gathered a lot of dust.

@sawfiler1958

4 жыл бұрын

That was my first computer, the TI994A.

The Turbo button actually first appeared on so called Turbo XTs using an 8088-2 processor. To be compatible with the original IBM PC, they ran on standard 4.77MHz, but with the press of a button you could switch the clock speed to 8 or even up to 10MHz. The 8088-2 was rated for a max. 10MHz clock speed, while the standard 8088 was only rated for 5MHz. The reason IBM didn't run the system at full 5MHz was, that with 4.77MHz the NTSC color burst frequency could be generated directly from the system clock. You could fine-adjust the burst frequency by slightly adjusting the system clock using the little tuning capacitor near the expansion slots.

@vwestlife

5 жыл бұрын

The first computer with a turbo button was the Eagle PC Turbo in 1984, with an Intel 8086 running at 8 MHz. Disabling turbo mode didn't actually slow down the clock speed of the CPU; it just added wait states.

@kpanic23

5 жыл бұрын

VWestlife That's interesting, so turbo/deturbo by other measures actually seems to predate just changing the system clock. The earliest examples of Turbo XTs I personally know really do change the system clock. Measuring with an oscilloscope on the CPU's clock pin, you can see the frequency changing between 4.77 and 8.15 respectively 9.77 MHz. Very intriguing, indeed!

@vwestlife

5 жыл бұрын

Yes, most "Turbo XT" systems do change the clock speed between 4.77 MHz, 7.16 MHz (50% faster), and 9.54 MHz (twice as fast).

@kpanic23

5 жыл бұрын

I guess the problem on an 8086-based system is, that even with 4.77MHz the sheer fact that the data bus is 16bit causes some software to run too fast. So adding waitstates on memory access to reduce the transfer speed to the level of the 8088's 8bit transfers seems like the perfect choice.

@briantw

5 жыл бұрын

That sounds interesting. How did they derive the 3.579545 MHz NTSC clock from the 4.77 MHz CPU clock?

Wow. This is a great video on the IBM PC. Subscribed!

WOW. Great info, thanks for the upload!! Very interesting. That PC sitting next to you, was almost identical to the one I had when I first got into the"IBM" type PCs. Such memories this brings back. MY very 1st computer was in fact an Atari 800 XL. I miss that one. I went from that to an Atari 130 XE, then to the IBM one sitting next to you. Since then I have become a computer tech of over 25 years experience. Gonna share this on Facebook, =)

I think that Lotus 123 spreadsheet was also a huge driver of sales for PCs

Lots of great info, very well presented. Nice research too. Enjoyed this bit of microcomputer history. : )

Great work. An excellent evaluation of IMHO a computer underappreciated for its impact. And you're absolutely right about the keyboard. I'd been banging on Kaypros, Osbornes, Radio Shacks, and others, and when I touched the IBM PC keyboard I was sold immediately. Hands down, the best keyboard built for PCs ever.

Thanks for this video. Very interesting. I've been obsessed with Apple history over the years, I almost forgot how the PC ever became so dominant. Better specs, cheaper off the shelf parts, good marketing, good reviews. It's funny how much of the reason the PC was so good even in 1981 still applies to this day 37 years later!!

@wildbill4476

5 жыл бұрын

Actually while all of the reasons you list contributed to the PC explosion but in addition to a good PC that the PC took off was because it was an IBM and everyone knew IBM made real computers, not toys and gadgets. IBM legitimized the micro in the corporate landscape as well to most people, after all IBM was known for one thing, the made real computers.

@ConwayBob

5 жыл бұрын

@@wildbill4476 -- And don't forget the IBM-PC's open architecture with all of those expansion slots which many of us filled up with third-party cards of various kinds. My favorite of those was the Turtle Beach Sound Card with its onboard E-Mu Proteus synthesizer.

@psdaengr911

5 жыл бұрын

Unfortunately, even with all the polish, bells and whistles, the software that is developed for it hasn't improved its reliability or security since 1980's DOS, and it still uses a dead end processor architecture.

It was really the software revolution that fueled this hardware revolution. The fact that anybody could learn to program in Fortran - Basic - Pascal, and Cobol opened up the world of computing.

@rogermwilcox

5 жыл бұрын

I don't think there was a single soul who programed in COBOL on the IBM PC. Yes, I say that despite the existence of Microsoft COBOL. The only reason anybody used COBOL at the time is because ancient IBM 360/370 mainframe software was often written in COBOL and had to be maintained.

@francishunt562

Жыл бұрын

@@rogermwilcox COBOL is still used extensively worldwide, which says a lot about it's original design and longevity.

Cool video! And very informative. Thank you!

Thanks for an interesting video. I was fortunate to work for a company that bought me a 5150 in '81 after I transitioned them to an IBM Mini for accounting and record keeping. An XT and AT followed (along with a PS/2 Model 25 which my kids enjoyed).

That was bloody interesting. Thank you

holy crap those keyboards are some of the best built keyboards that ever existed that were mass produced

@richardfabish607

5 жыл бұрын

I still have a old IBM keyboard, with two PS/2 style connectors (one for the keyboard, and one for the TrackPoint). I use it as an external keyboard for my Lenovo ThinkPad. All I needed to do that was to get a PS/2 to USB adapter. IBM keyboards have always been the best.

Excellent presentation, it was like a trip down memory lane for me. I started at IBM in 1980 right at the beginning of the PC era. I was working with the large 3081 and 3090 mainframes. IBM never really embraced the PC because the mainframes where their bread and butter at the time. At some point in my IBM career I used every PC they produced, mostly for testing but also in day to day work. By 1986 our office 3270 dumb terminals had been replace by PC/AT's with 3270 emulation cards.

Yours has to be the best intro I've seen in a good while on KZread. Short and to the point.

Quite an interesting video. I lived through a lot of that history.

0:32 Wow, I still have some of those books! (The manuals on the desk in front of him...)

Kudos on the best vlog about the history of the IBM PC. I lived through all you mentioned.

@veiledzorba

4 жыл бұрын

I did too - there was a lot of yakking about IBM "legitimatizing" the microcomputer industry. About the only thing they ever did that was truly innovative was to introduce the DE-9 connector for RS-232 ports, and that wasn't until the AT (which should have been what was introduced in '81).

As always, superb docco. Am in the middle of reading Paul Allen's "Idea Man", and your video allowed me a great deal more understanding of his interpretation of events. Thanks.

Hi All, Wow pretty good summary, and the same way that i saw it happen. I find the IBM PC - XT - AT has a similar success when you compare it to they 60's and early 70's muscle cars, ie they were a great improvement on what was available at the time, and very cost effective, however as the world progressed, many people did not want to let go, many businesses who "took a risk or invested big $$$ " in say a XT class machine did not want to get rid of it 2 to 3 years late, if it not a car or a rental / lease set up, plus the software is pricey, i should go find the wordstar / lotus 123 pricing , but whatever t 3as it was pricey The other reason for success, is that if you had a IBM PC , you had a standard and a floppy with a program or a saved file would work on any other IBM PC, whereas if you had a apple it has to be the same class eg Apple or MAC, same with commodore and all the others. For me the benefit was you could use a program at work and finish it at home, or write a letter at home, and take the floppy to work and print it out on a dot matrix or daisy wheel printer, does this sound sill in 2018 - Yes but in 80's and 90's it was a fact and a serious issue I found 640k and EGA to be sweet spot - pretty much limitless, as for processor power, sure 4.0 mhz is tiny compared to today, but that is all the software required, it worked, using a 80286 8m or 12m just made things faster ( and speed sensitive games unplayable until they designed a clock speed test and a delay in cpu clicks to compensate) The only thing i did not like about my XT and AT was the bare bones cards, in XT i paid for a adlib, then a clock card, then a IO card, then a hard drive controller I think the AT had built in clock and base I/O for serial and parallel but a combo card for I/O floppy / IDE but that could be my 386/486's, everything took up a slot and you run out of slot fast and IRQ's The clones is like the star wars movie ( Attack Of The Clones ) it bought across competition, innovation and massive price drop - pick a number almost 50% Good to see, how about a follow up on general 386/486 growth in business and homes Regards George

@pelgervampireduck

5 жыл бұрын

not only you could bring the floppy to print a file at home, you knew you could use it on any other PC computer, and if you got a new model like a 286 or a 386, you still could use it. the advantages PCs have over other computers are the backwards compatibility and being an universal standard.

@HartmutWSager

5 жыл бұрын

You mention running out of IRQ's (along with card slots). See my comment that I'm posting right now at the "main level" (not replies) on this topic.

The operating system seems very interesting of its time Finding interesting programs to run on a PC/XT isn't too hard, however most libraries don't post up the memory requirements or display requirements. So for those of us with 256Kb RAM, twin floppies and an original IBM MDA - what is there that isn't painful to use? Interested in good alternatives to WordStar (which I have but am not fond of to be honest), maybe a spreedsheet program, and a few games. Most of the software I'm familiar with seems to be 1987-1993

@drivers99

Жыл бұрын

The standard word processor would be WordPerfect. It has a great feature called “reveal codes” so you could see why the text was being formatted a certain way and fix it. Something that Microsoft Word really needs. For spreadsheets there is Lotus 1-2-3.

I didn't realize how much I missed seeing those old machines until you showed that shot of that monochrome screen on a desk. Made me want to play PCTREK.

A very nice look back. I was a computer tech in Manhatten in 1985. I can remember the "attitudes" of big blue personnel. I remember the flap about a then almost unheard of design flaw of a TI chip that found its way into actual production, and how we were "coached" on how to talk to customers about it. Oh boy, how the time does fly.

You sound like a mix of Anthony Kuhn and Ira Flatow :-) (a good thing). You could fill in for either. :) Great teaching video :) Some would argue that Byte's keyboard comment is still true today. (wasn't it odd layout to *resemble* the Selectric?) I remember some years back they were trying to buy the m back from the general public, around $75 apiece. I say this because I was working for a department that only months (weeks?) before I learned of this, I was responsible for disposing of hundreds of these, as we made room for *gasp* Compaq pentiums... BTW it's also technically "Incorrect" to say PC ("Personal Computer") to only mean "IBM/x86" compatible, but people do that too. LONG LIVE KING'S QUEST! lol

16:30 "IBM still underestimated demand" More cynically, this could be seen as the birth of artificial scarcity :P

Well done. Really enjoyed it.

Excellent Video, thank you!

I remember setting the DIP switches on these...

My first real PC was an IBM. I needed to replace a hard drive on it, a Pentium 100MHz Aptiva PS/2 . 18 pages of manual (with pictures!) and half a dozen circuit boards later (a riser card, a tv tuner, a soundboard, a modem, a network card, and a couple more) I had it apart in my desk. 48 screws came out of it just to get to the HDD. My mom looked at my room, boards sprawled everywhere, asks "will you be able to put it back together?" To what I replied "thick book over there is a manual, mom". Then it dawned on me, any 16-year old could take it apart, because I WAS THAT 16 year old. I put it back together with just 16 screws, and indeed, it was built like a tank, it could take some serious Richter Scale shaking to tear it apart, even with just 2 screws bolting each thing down. And it worked flawlessly, after a couple floppy disk boots to flash the BIOS for the new HDD compatibility. Such a tremendous legacy by IBM: DOCUMENTATION, STANDARDS. Today you can buy PC parts anywhere, and they will just work if you plug them together.

@psdaengr911

5 жыл бұрын

My first "real" PC was a 286 machine built by Olivertti, marketed by ATT. It was every bit as good in construction quality as IBM's XT, and the documentation was more than adequate for me to learn DOS and start a +30 year career in IT. The only software company whose documentation ever came close to the quality of ATT or IBMs hardware docs was Novell.

Man this brings back great memories as a kid working away with this system, so much history that I didn’t know as being age 6 with this beast

Great video! Information presented was accurate and well organized. I lived through that time and all those changes as well. I especially liked the acknowledgement of Don Estridge at the end. Don was a visionary, even if he did father the PCjr.