Underrated video. Keep it up.

Thank you

@21:00 Was it Mehmed II who named it istanbul? I think it was still called Konstantiniyya.

Wait so ur not say ING the Turks and Aryans are not one ?

Although most think of Hazaras of Afghanistan as descendants of the Mongols, evidence suggests to their being in Afghanistan before the Mongols. Most Hazaras who are acquainted with history claim hephthalites to be their ancestors along with several turkic empires that ruled that area before, and after Islam.

@mr.x653

2 жыл бұрын

The Hephtalites were Turkic too. Hazara are an amalgamation of various Turkic and Mongolic people

@storyleaks1681

2 жыл бұрын

@@mr.x653 ikr. Ever since the annexation of Hazaristian (Hazarajat) into Afghanistan, the Hazaras have been robbed even of their own history. It's funny seeing the Afghans claiming the Hepthalites to be their ancestors, and the Persians trying to claim turkic history just because those turkic empires chose Persian as their court langauge. The ghaznavids were also another turkic empire in Afghanistan and Iran. The ruler Mahmood or Ghazney was from karluq turks. Today we have karluq Hazaras.

@mr.x653

2 жыл бұрын

@@storyleaks1681 oh my God recently I see a surge on the internet of Pashtuns and Tajiks trying to claim that the Ghaznavids and Mahmud of Ghazni was not Turkic but Persian or Pashtun. And 'Islamic' history channels promote this shit too. It's truly shattering how intellectually ignorant the Muslim community has become

@storyleaks1681

2 жыл бұрын

@@mr.x653 Now you know why Afghans and Tajiks shout "mongols" at Hazaras. If they are proven to be turks, which it has been already, then they cannot steal their history.

@storyleaks1681

2 жыл бұрын

@Erqĭn Məmbetjanuli 🇰🇿 Q̆iyat There are more than 12 Hazara tribes. There are kipchaks, oghuz, and Karluk among us. There are mongols too. I am a Barlas Hazara, which has Turko mongol origin.

You have forgotten Turkmenstan! 😮 Until the end, you have told true history of turkic people, but then you told something else I dont support. I think scythians were saka, sumer originated who have come from central asia and siberia to west asia tousands of years before oghuz turks have settled to anatolia. The main reason to make me think so is ydna and mtdna genetics. Turkic people were altaic siberia originated and they have mixed with different other ethnicities. If we look at ydna, northern east asians and siberians have C3 mongolic, tungusic, N2, N3 uralic, finnic, O3 koreanic, japonic, P1, (and their descendants Q1a, R*) altaic siberian ydna. According to Martine Robbeets from Max Planck Institut, they have lived near Liao river at least 9k years ago speaking agglutinative languages like uralic-altaic. They were originated from southeast asia as descendants of C1b, C2, K2b, N*, O1, O2, P ydna. Then, agglutinative speaking siberian people have spread to both eastwards to americas and westwards to central asia. Central asian turkic people have generally 70% siberian (P1+R*,R1a,R1b+N2,N3+O3+C3) ydna. Most possible candidates for ancestry are altaians as 80% P1+R*,R1a,R1b and 15-20% other uralic-altaic genetics as also we know turkic people are altaic siberia originated people. Also I tried to inspect mtdna haplogroups and I have realized that uralic-altaic siberian mtdna haplogroups are mostly D, G, C-Z, Y, A-X, I-W and partly N, E, F, B mtdna. From this aspect, one of the furthest Turkey turks have 25-30% R1a+R1b+N3 uralic-altaic siberian ydna paternal side and 25% uralic-altaic siberian mtdna maternal side. Yes you are right, turkic people include also european H-V, J-T, U-K mtdna maternal and I1 germanic, I2 slavic, J2 grecoroman ydna paternal linages in different regions having different mixtures regionally. I think europeans have also siberian ydna and mtdna in high or low percentages in different people. In my opinion, these siberian originated european people were actually speaking agglutinative languages like dene-yeniseian, saka-sumer-scythian, tyrrhenian-vasconic, north caucasian (dene-caucasian languages) and hunnic-uralic-altaic languages. Turkic migration did not start just in first century BC. Mal'ta buret, tagar, baikal, slab grave, okunevo, afontova, karasuk etc. elder cultures have genetic relationship with altaic siberians by ydna, but on the other hand they had european mtdna haplogroups. European scientists should leave their prejudices and try to understand their non-indoeuropean genetics inside their population better.

If so ur going against evidence why is there symbolic language gene culture closeness .. then I disagree this video 📸