The scripture is the line of distinction! Galatians 1:8 "But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed."

@ShirleyAnnPetrillo-oj7sc

4 ай бұрын

👆”accursed” cursed, anathema. Just as it was said here, I recently read that RC Council of Trent listed 151 ANATHEMAS against Gospel Truth believers/Reformers. 1️⃣5️⃣1️⃣ Curses “on the books” unchanged, official RC dogma. RCC wants UNITY with those they curse ? Don’t trust the UN-trustworthy. Just say NO to Deception.

RE: THE TRIP TO BRITISH AREAS. How can a believer not seriously be emotionally devastated by Rome's burning of Christian's FOR believing the Lord's Supper and/ or translating the Bible? We appreciate the bravery & fidelity of faith, but it is solemn. Rome should be BEYOND SHAME. I think I'd be righteously angry or solemnly thankful--similar to Memorial Day or Hawaii's sunken ship memorial. How could one be happy there? These memorialize the taking & giving of lives.

@earlwhite3760

Ай бұрын

Exactly. My spirit is grieved with the evil stain of the RCC. Millions upon millions, (I've read 150 million) true believers massacred by the Pope's armies. Never, never an apology for naming them as heritics or for the mass genocide. The absolute manipulation of history, confiscating of history documents and the Jesuits role even to this very day as they infiltrate every institution to push Vatican history & to strengthen it. I find the RCC the most hideous evil institution there is and obviously truly is the seat of the antichrist

It goes without saying that everything given to humanity comes through His Grace to us. When we express knowledge of Him and begin to place our faith and trust in Him, we confirm and conform our will to all that He commanded (for love of Him and our neighbor).

I am a Born Again believer in Jesus Christ. My family are Roman Catholics. My dad is 87 and I was able to get him to accept a wonderful study Bible, but I can only pray he will actually read it. It is so hard to get through to him because the Roman Catholic Church has been around seemingly since Christ walked the earth. Instead of reading and seeking, they are spoon fed the doctrines that are, like you mentioned, heretical. I want my dad and family to see that the Five Solas are all we need. I am so thankful for the reformation and teachers like RC Sproul ( I use his study Bible), and you fine pastors! Thank you for this teaching. I only wish my family would watch it. Another point to add to your discussion is the heresy of Transubstantiation. I was at a Lutheran Church for Resurrection Sunday and the Priest even stated he didn't know how it worked but he has complete faith in the literal words of Jesus in the Red Letters of the Bible. Wow. So much there that is so wrong. But everyone but me took of the communion. The road is wide that leads to destruction....

@staza1

Жыл бұрын

I'm in the same situation with my family and my elderly father. They are too brainwashed so I've given up unfortunately.

@barbwellman6686

Жыл бұрын

St. Paul was Eucharistic 1 Cor 11 23 For I received from the Lord what I also delivered to you, that the Lord Jesus on the night when he was betrayed took bread, 24 and when he had given thanks, he broke it, and said, “This is my body which is for you. Do this in remembrance of me.” 25 In the same way also the cup, after supper, saying, “This cup is the new covenant in my blood. Do this, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of me.” 26 For as often as you eat this bread and drink the cup, you proclaim the Lord’s death until he comes. Partaking of the Supper Unworthily 27 Whoever, therefore, eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty of profaning the body and blood of the Lord. 28 Let a man examine himself, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup. 29 For any one who eats and drinks without discerning the body eats and drinks judgment upon himself. 30 That is why many of you are weak and ill, and some have died. 31 But if we judged ourselves truly, we should not be judged. 32 But when we are judged by the Lord, we are chastened so that we may not be condemned along with the world."

@barbwellman6686

Жыл бұрын

@Robert Stephenson "50 When Jesus had cried out again in a loud voice, He yielded up His spirit. At that moment the veil of the temple was torn in two from top to bottom. The earth quaked and the rocks were split. The tombs broke open, and the bodies of many saints who had fallen asleep were raised. 53After Jesus’ resurrection, when they had come out of the tombs, they entered the holy city and appeared to many people." Matthew 27

@barbwellman6686

Жыл бұрын

@Robert Stephenson St. Paul ordained the two Gentiles Timothy and Titus. The Gospel of Luke was written by a converted Gentile. John 20:29 Jesus said unto him, “Thomas, because thou hast seen Me, thou hast believed. Blessed are they that have not seen and yet have believed.”

@staza1

Жыл бұрын

@Robert Stephenson Dear brainwashed catholic, you are saved by faith only. Then you start obeying Christ by following the holy spirit inside you. You are saved FOR good works not BY good works. And you certainly shouldn't obey weak, fat child abusers in long robes. And your good works are certainly not catholic rituals, but taking care of widows and orphans. If you actually believe catholicism, you can't be a true christian.

All glory to God

@gch8810

Жыл бұрын

Unam Sanctam Catholicam

@michael7144

Жыл бұрын

@@gch8810 Jesus is the Eternal Son of God, the all-sufficient Savior, Prophet, priest, and King. He is the one mediator between God and man, and the only head of his church.

@gch8810

Жыл бұрын

@@michael7144 Amen. Catholics don’t disagree with anything that you just said.

@michael7144

Жыл бұрын

@Nicholas TV well hello there

@michael7144

Жыл бұрын

@Nicholas TV I am old enough. And I am working. Why are you asking these questions?

You mentioned my thirteenth great-grandfather, John Rogers of the Thomas Matthew Bible, who was the first martyr because of Bloody Mary. I feel like I knew him. I can’t wait to meet him. I appreciate your ministry as I am studying about the Roman Catholic Church so I warn people about this false religion.

@frederic2796

8 ай бұрын

Have you ever considered that if your 13th great-grandfather, John Rogers, would have read the Bible for himself instead of listening to the so-called reformers that he would not have been put to death for his heretical beliefs? Well, that is until Bloody Bess, Queen Elizabeth came along. Bloody Bess butchered many good people for believing in the True Gospel, so John Rogers would have died one way or the other, but it is better to die for the Truth of the Gospel rather than for the false doctrines of the reformers. A friend of mine was proud of her 13th great-grandfather Thomas Cromwell, who was the chief minister to King Henry VIII, and instrumental in the execution of Saint Thomas More. She was once a dedicated Methodist and then Baptist, and very proud of her Protestant heritage. But then she studied the history of the Church and the Bible, and the more she studied the more Catholic she became. I remember her amazement at not being able to find any Protestant doctrines in the Bible. And her equal amazement that the things that she had heard about the Catholic Church all turned out to be false. She learned that Catholic doctrines and Biblical doctrines were exactly the same, and finally concluded that Protestantism was a false religion, and soon after brought here whole family into full unity with the Catholic Church. She is now a big fan of the heroic life of St. Thomas More. I pray that you will be honest with yourself in your studies of the Catholic Church. I would invite you to ask any questions that you may have, and I will share all that I know and believe with you. The two guys in this video presentation are totally mischaracterizing what the Catholic Church teaches. If you just stick with what the Bible teaches then you will indeed become Catholic. God bless.

@ChristisLord2023

7 ай бұрын

Dr James White has had several moderated debates with leading RCC apologists, those are a wonderful source of information for a clear view of both sides.

@loboman8029

7 ай бұрын

@@ChristisLord2023 I would be glad if you could ask Dr James White if he could answer the following = basic = question I have posted above - titled CHALLENGE = Can = any = Protestant, give the answer to this most = basic = and fundamental Question = Why did Jesus incarnate as a Man and die on the Cross ?? (( Note = a review of the following points is necessary before answer )) Kindly check the full message. Thanks

@mitchellosmer1293

7 ай бұрын

@@frederic2796 quote---She learned that Catholic doctrines and Biblical doctrines were exactly the same. unquote LOL--ROFL---LMAO SUCH A LIAR!!! ---#1--Where does the Bible teach that Sunday is a holy day? #2--Quote the Holy Bible that says GOD RESTED on the first day of the week. #3---Quote the Holy Bible that says GOD BLESSED the first day of the week. #4---Quote the Holy Bible that says GOD SANCTIFIED the first day of the week. #5--Quote the Holy Bible that says GOD GAVE A NAME TO first day of the week. #6--Quote the Holy Bible that says GOD DECLARES the first day of the week AS HIS HOLY DAY #7--Quote the Holy bible that says we are to pray to Mary. #8---Quote the Holy bible that says Mary is alive in heaven. #9---Quote the Holy bible that says Mary is an intercessor. ---#10--Quote the Holy bible that says there was Cathoic church at the time of Christ in Jerusalem ,or up to 100AD. #11---Quote the Bible that says: “The Pope is not only the representative of Jesus Christ, HE IS JESUS CHRIST HIMSELF, hidden under the veil of flesh.” Catholic National July 1895. #12---quote the Bible that says : “The Pope is of so great dignity and so exalted that he is not a mere man, but as it were God, and the vicar of God…He is likewise the divine monarch and supreme emperor and king of kings. Hence the pope Is crowned with a triple crown, as king of heaven and of earth and of the lower regions.” Ferraris EccI. Dictionary (Catholic) Article, Pope. #13---Quote the Holy Bible that says God changes and He changed to Sabbath to Sunday. #14---Quote the Holy Bible that says we are to worhip Mary. #15---Quote the Holy Bible that says a mere man is above the Bibke (scripture/God). #16--Quote the Holy Bible that says that through the catholiuc church is the ONLY way to salvation. #17---I have had several "experts" claim the disciples were catholics. Quote that from the Holy Bible. #18---Quote the Holy Bible that tells of Jesus teaching Mary to pray to/with beads. #19---Quote the Holy Bible that says the Pope is the head of Christ' Church. #20---Quote from the Holy Bible that the CC is infallible. ----Here's what I know about Catholicism:There are no priests in the New Testament, there are no altars, there are no sacrifices, there are no scapulars, there are no mitre, there are no orders of monks, there are no nuns, there are no bishops in the sense of the Roman Catholic church, there is no monarchical episcopate, there are no popes, there is no apostolic succession, there are no candles, there is no Lent, there is no holy water, there are no sacraments, there is no extreme unction, there is no purgatory, there is no penance, there are no sacraments, there is no veneration of objects, images or relics, there is no praying to dead people, there is no veneration of Mary, there is no immaculate conception, there is no assumption of Mary, there is no Holy Mary, Mother of God.

@stever4181

6 ай бұрын

@@frederic2796 Tell me where in scriptures do we read about the Catholic Church or that Jesus started the CC. Then show me where Jesus stated Mary was sinless, assumed, or has anything to do with salvation. Lets see the truth you can provide.

It’s a style of conversation where the companion is recognizing and understanding what the other person is saying, different people have different conversation styles they grew up with as a habit.

1 Cor 3 "If anyone builds on this foundation using gold, silver, precious stones, wood, hay, or straw, his workmanship will be evident, because the Day will bring it to light. It will be revealed with fire, and the fire will prove the quality of each man’s work. If what he has built survives, he will receive a reward. If it is burned up, he will suffer loss. He himself will be saved, but only as if through the flames.

The roman catholic faith is not only heresy but straight out BLASPHEMY.. turning the Lord into a idol mary into a god worship angels saints the dead dead body parts so forth and so on. BLASPHEMOUS works...

@titounoundici

10 ай бұрын

Andrewstidham, who put such a hatred into your heart? And how do you dare to deny that you never read the Catholic Cathechism, or any catholic doctrinal document? Do you think you can hide your lack of knowledge and your blind indoctrination... Of course you don't mind to cut a poor figure. But you know that I am right. That's why you got annoyed by my words. Be honest with yourself and admit that you've talked amiss. And be sure that, either you like it or not, the Roman catholic church is the true church. And you will agree after studying as you need. God bless you.

@sebastiansingh5167

5 ай бұрын

​@titounoundici repent honestly from what your believing

@f.r.ashley1317

2 ай бұрын

Heresy is a word that is used too much.

listening to this conversation, I must ask the question again - some people say there are truly saved, born again believers in the RCC - and I ask (again) how is that possible????? why would someone who has been shown the Truth and received it continue to sit under cult leadership and doctrines of demons?

@amichiganblackman3200

Жыл бұрын

Just as there are lazy and inattentive church goers in real churches, they exist in false churches, too. Many Catholics don't know what there church teaches because they don't pay attention.

@siftedsands6383

Жыл бұрын

I think their conversation here is a good one. However, I am inclined to agree with you. Every testimony I've from heard a Catholic who found the true Jesus Christ is that they quickly become an ex-Catholic soon after being born again. I caution against this line of thinking that there may be somewhere born again Christians in the bosom of "Mother Church", because this may give people a false sense of complacency about Catholics. They absolutely need salvation and to be brought out of the man made, demonically inspired traditions of Romanism.

@TheRoger1205

Жыл бұрын

Gauging from my family, it is probably a false conversion. The RCC has been around so long that they have a dominance that can only be broken by true radical conversion. Once converted it is possible to stay in a false church. I was a Seventh Day Adventist until I was baptized and they revealed the true background of their cult. There is no way the Holy Spirit allows you to stay. In fact, the Holy Spirit gives you the wisdom to try to pull some from the fire.

@whoaboa1429

Жыл бұрын

Because some will read the Bible and learn the truth, but then casually go to a Catholic Church and don’t bother with the extra teachings. They aren’t familiar with the teachings in-depth. In that way their faith might preserve them.

@barbwellman6686

Жыл бұрын

Because Christ promised that the gates of hell would not prevail against His One Holy Apostolic Church. Christ exorcises demons through the Catholic Church. Luke "17 Jesus knew their thoughts and said to them: “Any kingdom divided against itself will be ruined, and a house divided against itself will fall. 18 If Satan is divided against himself, how can his kingdom stand? I say this because you claim that I drive out demons by Beelzebul. 19 Now if I drive out demons by Beelzebul, by whom do your followers drive them out? So then, they will be your judges. 20 But if I drive out demons by the finger of God, then the kingdom of God has come upon you.

Anyone who preaches another Gospel is NOT a preacher from our Lord GOD!

@barbwellman6686

Жыл бұрын

Calvinism preaches that God only saves those He preordained, independent of those who wish to come to Him. That is a false Gospel. Faith "alone" for salvation is another false gospel. James 2: What good is it, my brothers, if someone claims to have faith, but has no deeds? Can such faith save him? Suppose a brother or sister is without clothes and daily food. If one of you tells him, “Go in peace; stay warm and well fed,” but does not provide for his physical needs, what good is that? So too, faith by itself, if it does not result in action,f is dead. But someone will say, “You have faith and I have deeds.” Show me your faith without deeds, and I will show you my faith by my deeds. You believe that God is one. Good for you! Even the demons believe that-and shudder. O foolish man, do you want evidence that faith without deeds is worthless? Was not our father Abraham justified by what he did when he offered his son Isaac on the altar? You see that his faith was working with his actions, and his faith was perfected by what he did. And the Scripture was fulfilled that says, “Abraham believed God, and it was credited to him as righteousness,” and he was called a friend of God. As you can see, a man is justified by his deeds and not by faith alone. In the same way, was not even Rahab the prostitute justified by her actions when she welcomed the spiesk and sent them off on another route? As the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without deeds is dead.

@jamestrotter3162

Жыл бұрын

@@barbwellman6686 " All that the Father gives Me will come to Me, and the one who comes to Me I will by no means cast out."-John 6:37. " No one can come to Me unless the Father who sent Me draws him; and I will raise him up at the last day."-Jn. 6:44.

@barbwellman6686

Жыл бұрын

@James Trotter 1 Timothy 2 2 First of all, then, I urge that supplications, prayers, intercessions, and thanksgivings be made for all men, 2 for kings and all who are in high positions, that we may lead a quiet and peaceable life, godly and respectful in every way. ☆☆☆☆3 This is good, and it is acceptable in the sight of God our Savior, 4 who desires all men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth.☆☆☆☆ 5 For there is one God, and there is one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus, ☆☆☆☆☆who gave himself as a ransom for all, ☆☆☆☆☆the testimony to which was borne at the proper time. 7 For this I was appointed a preacher and apostle (I am telling the truth, I am not lying), a teacher of the Gentiles in faith and truth.

@michaelbrunsdon8938

11 ай бұрын

Some non-catholic groups deny the words of Jesus when he said that His body is real food.

Excellent job, brothers. Thank you for this subject highlight. Let God be glorified and use this message to call His sheep

In a conversation among my Roman Catholic relatives one of my brothers voiced what my family learned from the Roman Church. He said you cannot trust the Bible because every one has his own interpretation. All my family agreed. I was a black sheep for not believing it anymore.

@DD-bx8rb

4 ай бұрын

We trust the Bible. It is the written Word, that portion of the Oral Word that was eventually written down as written scripture. But we cannot trust the private interpretations of the Word by groups/individuals. The Bible is infallible, but the intepretations of those who read it are not. Only the church has the divine guarantee. "The pillar and foundation of the truth is the church" (1Tim 3:15) and NOT individual interpretation. It is great to read, pray, and meditate on the Scriptures, but they must be understood in the context of the church from which they come from.

@stever4181

4 ай бұрын

@@DD-bx8rb Hogwash!. The CC is no different to those you condemn. Where is it mentioned that Mary was sinless, assumed, to be prayed to, has anything to do with salvation, Peter is the first pope and the list goes on. The CC does not have authority and the Apostles were never given authority. They were messengers who carried God's word. Therefore any authority that the CC claim they have is self-professed and that is no authority.

@DD-bx8rb

4 ай бұрын

@@stever4181 I recommend to you the site Catholic Answers. Peace be with your spirit.

@beadoll8025

4 ай бұрын

​@@stever4181Amen

@user-wj4gv4cf2c

3 ай бұрын

@@stever4181 Well said brother. For centuries the CC tried to act as gatekeepers to the Scriptures, saying that only they could interpret them and you just had to accept what they said or you were an anathema. This is why they mercilessly persecuted those translating the Bible into the common vernacular. They wanted sheep who can be controlled, not people who can read and reason for themselves. Anyone of sound mind can see that the many doctrines of the Catholic Church are just so incongruent with the Holy Scriptures. The CC slaughtered tens of thousands of Christians and others....hardly the Church founded by Christ.

Thanks so much brothers! A great source for information about Roman Catholicism is Mike Gendron, who was saved out of Catholicism and whose ministry reaches out to RC’s with the true Gospel.

Very well done! Speaking truth in love.

Matthew 25. Active faith is required for salvation 41 Then shall he say also unto them on the left hand, Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels: 42 For I was an hungred, and ye gave me no meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me no drink: 43 I was a stranger, and ye took me not in: naked, and ye clothed me not: sick, and in prison, and ye visited me not. 44 Then shall they also answer him, saying, Lord, when saw we thee an hungred, or athirst, or a stranger, or naked, or sick, or in prison, and did not minister unto thee? 45 Then shall he answer them, saying, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye did it not to one of the least of these, ye did it not to me. 46 And these shall go away into everlasting punishment: but the righteous into life eternal.

Canon 11. If anyone says that men are justified either by the sole imputation of the justice of Christ or by the sole remission of sins, to the exclusion of the grace and the charity which is poured forth in their hearts by the Holy Ghost,[116] and remains in them, or also that the grace by which we are justified is only the good will of God, let him be anathema. Canon 12. If anyone says that justifying faith is nothing else than confidence in divine mercy,[117] which remits sins for Christ's sake, or that it is this confidence alone that justifies us, let him be anathema. Canon 13. If anyone says that in order to obtain the remission of sins it is necessary for every man to believe with certainty and without any hesitation arising from his own weakness and indisposition that his sins are forgiven him, let him be anathema. Canon 14. If anyone says that man is absolved from his sins and justified because he firmly believes that he is absolved and justified,[118] or that no one is truly justified except him who believes himself justified, and that by this faith alone absolution and justification are effected, let him be anathema. Canon 15. If anyone says that a man who is born again and justified is bound ex fide to believe that he is certainly in the number of the predestined,[119] let him be anathema.

Nominal Christianity is synonymous to the previous email. “IT’S ALSO THE ONLY WAY TO BE CHRISTIAN.”

I am a Born Again Christian , I was born into Roman catholism , By Gods Grace i Became a Child of Jesus , many years ago ,. When Jesus Baptises A Person with his Holy Spirit , it is impossable to have any intrest in pagan vatican religion . I Praise and Thank My God of the Holy Bible , that there are Thousands of Born Again Christians here in Ireland , We are Spiritual Children of The Living God ,. Roman cathholics priests hate us Christian,s Please Pray for Ireland ,. Thanks for video .

Thank you men; well done! I was raised atheist (more-or-less) and was born again as a Christian in early adulthood. I participated at various Protestant churches and believed I was led to the Catholic church 11 years ago. Much of what the Catholic church teaches never sat right with me despite hours of prayer, conversation and study. I chalked it up to various reasons, and worked to become more docile. However, I believe I'm now being led away from the Catholic church. But i wonder, am I deceiving myself again? And I realize the implications that returning to the Protestant church (or not doing so, for that matter) would have on my wife and teenage children (who have no real memory of the time we spent in our non-denominational church due to their young ages at the time). And to what Protestant denomination would I go? My family and I tend to be cynical, and I'm concerned we would be dissuaded by much of what we'd encounter in the Protestant church these days as well. Im open to any advice, and certainly to your prayers. Peace!

@annekelly9375

3 ай бұрын

Jesus Said You Must Be Born Again ,The Gospel of John Ch. 3 v 7 ,. Dont go to any denomination dead religious ch ,. Find a Penticostal Assembly ,. Focus on JESUS And His Holy Word ,. First Commandment ,.

@SouthernHiker

2 ай бұрын

Thank you for your advice

One of the steps that helped me through the elaborate system that is the Catechism of rhe Catholic Church is this; look up the definition of Sacrament. Second, Read the entire Bible. Especially Galatians and Romans. Finally, watch some debates with people like Trent Horn, Jimi Akin, Gavin Ortland, and James White. All these guys are very good at defending their positions. May God open your eyes to the Truth of the Gospel.

@stever4181

6 ай бұрын

...and lastly, ignor what the CC states it is a self-appointed false religion masquerading as an angel of light.

@stever4181

6 ай бұрын

@@ogmakefirefiregood The truth of the Gospel is not with the CC.

@ogmakefirefiregood

6 ай бұрын

@stever4181 I never said it was. Just look up the word "sacrament." That definition is really what the RCC is built upon.

@stever4181

6 ай бұрын

@@ogmakefirefiregood That is not totally true. It is built upon what they think about the Bible not on what it actually say. Sacraments. The word itself is instituted by man. Catholics have 7 sacraments. My question is who decided these 7? Since there is nothing in the Bible stating this word it has to come from man in an attempt to explain God's working. One of your Catholic sacraments is marriage and yet this is withheld from priests and the like even though Peter and Paul were married. Is this then from God or is it man that made that decision? Catholics do not look at the Bible as a whole but piecemeal it. Your sacraments are an example of this. Living a Godly life and surrendering your life to Jesus is what God wants. The CC sets up rules just as the Pharisees did and Jesus condemned them for it. The CC then becomes a works-based religion where you have to work for grace, not one of Grace alone.

@williambilinsky-di9mq

6 ай бұрын

You obviously don’t know much theology or scripture. Contact a knowledgeable Catholic layperson or priest and you will find an answer to all your nonsense.

Great conversation! Attended a G3 conference years ago. It was very edifying

Just to emphasize, many roman catholics love jesus and are woefully ignorant of true doctrine. They may be very much saved, just doctrinally messed up. So please be e very careful when you say to a Roman Catholic person "you're not saved." Make sure you get to know them FIRST.

@stever4181

6 ай бұрын

Unless you are God Himself no-one can say if a person is saved or not!

Canons Concerning Justification Canon 1. If anyone says that man can be justified before God by his own works, whether done by his own natural powers or through the teaching of the law,[110] without divine grace through Jesus Christ, let him be anathema. Canon 2. If anyone says that divine grace through Christ Jesus is given for this only, that man may be able more easily to live justly and to merit eternal life, as if by free will without grace he is able to do both, though with hardship and difficulty, let him be anathema. Canon 3. If anyone says that without the predisposing inspiration of the Holy Ghost[111] and without His help, man can believe, hope, love or be repentant as he ought,[112] so that the grace of justification may be bestowed upon him, let him be anathema. Canon 4. If anyone says that man's free will moved and aroused by God, by assenting to God's call and action, in no way cooperates toward disposing and preparing itself to obtain the grace of justification, that it cannot refuse its assent if it wishes, but that, as something inanimate, it does nothing whatever and is merely passive, let him be anathema. Canon 5. If anyone says that after the sin of Adam man's free will was lost and destroyed, or that it is a thing only in name, indeed a name without a reality, a fiction introduced into the Church by Satan, let him be anathema.

@barbwellman6686

Жыл бұрын

Canon 6. If anyone says that it is not in man's power to make his ways evil, but that the works that are evil as well as those that are good God produces, not permissively only but also propria et per se, so that the treason of Judas is no less His own proper work than the vocation of St. Paul, let him be anathema. Canon 7. If anyone says that all works done before justification, in whatever manner they may be done, are truly sins, or merit the hatred of God; that the more earnestly one strives to dispose himself for grace, the more grievously he sins, let him be anathema. Canon 8. If anyone says that the fear of hell,[113] whereby, by grieving for sins, we flee to the mercy of God or abstain from sinning, is a sin or makes sinners worse, let him be anathema. Canon 9. If anyone says that the sinner is justified by faith alone,[114] meaning that nothing else is required to cooperate in order to obtain the grace of justification, and that it is not in any way necessary that he be prepared and disposed by the action of his own will, let him be anathema. Canon 10. If anyone says that men are justified without the justice of Christ,[115] whereby Her merited for us, or by that justice are formally just, let him be anathema.

@barbwellman6686

Жыл бұрын

If anyone says that the grace of justification is shared by those only who are predestined to life, but that all others who are called are called indeed but receive not grace, as if they are by divine power predestined to evil, let him be anathema. Canon 18. If anyone says that the commandments of God are, even for one that is justified and constituted in grace,[121] impossible to observe, let him be anathema. Canon 19. If anyone says that nothing besides faith is commanded in the Gospel, that other things are indifferent, neither commanded nor forbidden, but free; or that the ten commandments in no way pertain to Christians, let him be anathema. Canon 20. If anyone says that a man who is justified and however perfect is not bound to observe the commandments of God and the Church, but only to believe,[122] as if the Gospel were a bare and absolute promise of eternal life without the condition of observing the commandments, let him be anathema.

If they would have done it correctly the first time, there would not be such a mess.

I have been struggling with Sola Scriptura. When two well-meaning Protestant brothers sit down and read our Bibles and come to contradictory opinions on its meaning regarding some core principle (salvation, baptism, etc.) which authority can we rely on to resolve these differences of interpretations?

@stever4181

3 ай бұрын

What is contradictory on salvation? What I have found in cases like this is one will read only the English translation and make a judgment while the other will look at the passage in its original Greek, then the customs, the times, why it was written and to whom, and then is what you say supported in scriptures. In other words, you study the scriptures not just say what you want to believe. This is what the CC does with many things.

@user-mv7kd7og5w

3 ай бұрын

​@@stever4181 Yes I do all that too, but we still would have different opinions on salvation with other Protestant brothers. One of them from a non-denomination congregation says they don't believe in faith alone. Then I ask the faith-alone brother whether I also need to be baptized to be saved. He starts with Acts 16:31 which says “Believe in the Lord Jesus and you will be saved, you and your household.” BUT WAIT... how does the jailer believing in Jesus get his family to Heaven? Well, the next verses tell us. “And they spoke the word of the Lord to him and to all that were in his house, and he took them the same hour of the night and washed their wounds, and he was baptized at once with all his family.” Notice that Acts doesn’t talk about the other members of the household coming to believe in Jesus. They hear the word of the Lord, and then they were baptized. Of course, then I go to 1 Peter 3:21 which tells that baptism saves us (sounds very clear to me). BUT WAIT... GotQuestions.com says that Water baptism is the outward testimony of the believer’s inward faith, and others say it is merely a symbol of our pledge to follow Jesus. BUT WAIT....it doesn’t correspond with the logic of Peter’s comparison between baptism and the story of Noah and the flood when eight persons were saved through water. SO... it sounds like I ALSO need to be baptized in order to be saved - so it is NOT Faith Alone. BUT WAIT... they tell me that I should be baptized because Jesus commanded that we be baptized. So it’s not necessary for salvation, but I need to do it anyways.???? Okay, well, what if I refuse to get baptized? Well, they say...then you would prove you weren’t really saved in the first place because you’re not being obedient to Jesus. So it’s not necessary for salvation to be baptized, but you still need to be baptized? It sure sounds necessary to me. My evangelicals friends would say that I don’t have to be baptized, I don’t have to confess my sins to GOD in order to be saved, but if I don’t do these things in the present or the future, that would prove I was never truly saved in the past, and so I am not saved in the present, and if I die in the future, I'll go to Hell. BUT AGAIN... that sounds like a bunch of requirements to be saved beyond just accepting Jesus as my Lord and Savior. AND THEN... I hear it’s not just getting baptized or confessing our sins, but you also have to be obedient to Christ. John 3:36 says, “He who believes in the Son has eternal life. He who does not OBEY the Son shall not see life, but the wrath of God rests upon him.” SO... I'm told that this means in order to prove you really were saved in the first place, there are certain sins you won’t commit on a habitual basis like fornication or drunkenness, and if you do commit these sins, you’ll ask God for forgiveness, not in order to actually be forgiven, but because you already have been forgiven. WHAT???? You see why I ask which authority is there we can fully rely on to resolve any differences of interpretations among our Protestant brothers?

the gospel is the basis of our salvation. walker correctly identifies repentance as critical to salvation. but what can i do if i live in an area of northcentral arkansas where none of the local churches clearly obey the word of God?

@G3, how do you define the idea of "woke?" As was referred to in today's episode? Do you discuss or define that term anywhere in other podcast or resources?

@SmileDarnYa

Жыл бұрын

Virgil Walker has a podcast along with Darrell Harrison called The Just Thinking Podcast. They have several episodes that define and admonish that ideology and many offshoots of the topics that are affected by wokeness, Critical Race Theory, social justice, and the like. Hope this helps! Enjoy!

Sola Sculptura…Good one, Virgil😁

POWERFUL CLEAR AND TRUE

@TOHCACTOHCAC-nh6ch

11 ай бұрын

That means you all are roman catholic

@TOHCACTOHCAC-nh6ch

11 ай бұрын

Why don't you debate Dr. Scott Hahn

@TOHCACTOHCAC-nh6ch

11 ай бұрын

You people are not christians

The Church Council of Jerusalem jointly decided that Baptism replaced circumcision and they wrote: "You must abstain from food sacrificed to idols, from blood, from the meat of strangled animals, and from sexual immorality. You will do well to avoid these things."

I thought Packer was reformed? He criticized Catholicism in his book, Knowing God.

@judithmargret5972

7 ай бұрын

BATTY, Yes Packer is reformed and Anglican. Maybe the Anglican was the reason he was there and signed the document. It's very disappointing to find this out.

St. Paul taught the same Gospel that Sts. Peter, James, Jude, John, Matthew, and Mark taught.

@johnlee8885

Жыл бұрын

Wrong Paul say my gospel revealed to him to by Jesus Christ Paul is the highest authority among all the apostle higher than Peter. Paul reboked Peter because he withdrew from the gentiles

@barbwellman6686

Жыл бұрын

@@johnlee8885 Paul and Barnabas traveling back to the Council at Jerusalem so that the united Church body would determine whether or not circumcision was additionally required after Baptism of water and the Holy Spirit. All the Apostles preached the same Gospel (as we see in Matthew, Mark, John and eventually Luke). Christ didn't give "keys to the Kingdom" to St. Paul nor did He symbolically change his name from Saul to Paul. The Church was in existence years prior to St. Paul's conversion.

The actual HERESY is this: The problem that protestants have is the same as Mormonism based on the following 3 arguments. (1) Mormons (Latter-Day Saints, or LDS) believe that after the death of the last Apostle, there was a “Great Apostasy.” Priesthood authority ceased, doctrine began to degenerate, and the true Gospel was lost (necessitating its “restoration” by Joseph Smith in the 19th century). (2) The vast majority of protestants reject multiple doctrines that were believed unanimously by ancient Christians, beginning with the very first Church Fathers who were discipled by the Apostles themselves. Specifically, these protestants reject three key doctrines: a. Baptismal regeneration (how we become Christians); b. Apostolic succession (how the Church is governed); and c. The sacrifice of the Eucharist (how Christians worship). (3) Therefore, whether they realize it or not, most protestants believe in a “Great Apostasy” theory of history that is virtually identical with that of the LDS. If all Christians of which we have any record-including the disciples of the Apostles-were unanimously wrong about how we become Christians, how the Church is governed, and how we worship as Christians (the “Three Doctrines”), there is no more fitting description of this massive falling away than a “Great Apostasy.” This necessarily means that creatures (the protestant “reformers,” or the LDS’s “prophet” Joseph Smith) outperformed the Creator, since their “gospels” and “churches” have now in one form or another lasted for centuries, whereas when Jesus originally established them, they fell apart immediately. In the writings of the Church Fathers every time they spoke about heresy and heretics, they were describing Protestantism. Protestantism is all over the place on the different positions. You can’t speak about the Protestant position on something, except perhaps in the form of a negative, like they’re contrary to the Catholic Church, they’re contrary to the Roman Pontiff. But the methods, the means, by which Protestants arrive at their theological conclusions were common in virtually all the heresies and the heretics that the Fathers talked about.

As Catholic I have few questions for you related to your belief of justification: 1. You believe that through faith alone you get Christ' righteousness imputed/counted on you and your sins (past, present and future) imputed/counted on Christ. How do you reconcile it with what Ezekiel 18:20 says (ESV): "The righteousness of the righteous shall be upon himself, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon himself."? Does this verse say both righteousness and wickedness are NOT transferrable from person to person? 2. You believe that by imputation you are counted as righteous while you remain unrighteous - in Latin "simul iustus et peccator". How do you reconcile it with what Ezekiel 33:12 says (ESV): "the righteous shall not be able to live by his righteousness when he sins.”? 3. You believe that God will let you enter heaven while you remain sinner (as your sins will be hidden under the righteousness of Christ imputed on you) and that God directed His wrath to Christ on the cross as your sins (past, present and future) imputed on Him, while He remains sinless. In contrast Prov. 17:15 says (ESV): "“He who justifies the wicked and he who condemns the righteous are both alike an abomination to the LORD.” Does your belief make God do what Scripture refers as abomination? 4. You believe that through faith (in Christ) alone you are counted as righteous, but not made righteous. In contrast Scripture says in Rom. 5:19 that through Christ we are made righteous. Who is right?

@johnlee8885

Жыл бұрын

Dude you dispensations are wrong again you are confused brother. The Old Testament is written to the Jews their salvation is by faith and works and has no assurance of salvation as written by Paul which has the final revelation to the Christian Church. Paul says my gospel. He received the final gospel revelations by Jesus himself. Salvation via grace through faith alone. Justification, imputation, assurance of salvation, redemption, sanctification, and glorification by faith alone. He met Peter, John and James at Jerusalem and taught them his gospel and taught Faith alone to the Gospel Jesus Christ virgin birth, suffered under pontius pilate crucified for all sins dead and buried resurrected on the third day ascended to the father. Well basically the Baptist confession of faith of 1689. We believe in a triune God

@justfromcatholic

Жыл бұрын

@@johnlee8885 I did not use the word "dispensations" and you blindly accused me. You did not even bother to read what I wrote - what you did is preaching your views. Your should try to answer all the FOUR points I raised regarding your belief.

@justfromcatholic

Жыл бұрын

@@johnlee8885 Why don't you rip-off the Old Testament is it is meant for the Jews? You keep on parroting what you are taught. Try to answer all the four points I raised. If you cannot do it just step back

@cynthiahunter2570

5 ай бұрын

Galatians 2:4 My concern was because of the false brothers [those people masquerading as Christians] who had been secretly smuggled in [to the community of believers]. They had slipped in to spy on the freedom which we have in Christ Jesus, in order to bring us back into bondage [under the Law of Moses].

@justfromcatholic

5 ай бұрын

@@cynthiahunter2570 Ezekiel is not part of Law of Moses

Canons concerning Justification Canon 6. If anyone says that it is not in man's power to make his ways evil, but that the works that are evil as well as those that are good God produces, not permissively only but also propria et per se, so that the treason of Judas is no less His own proper work than the vocation of St. Paul, let him be anathema. Canon 7. If anyone says that all works done before justification, in whatever manner they may be done, are truly sins, or merit the hatred of God; that the more earnestly one strives to dispose himself for grace, the more grievously he sins, let him be anathema. Canon 8. If anyone says that the fear of hell,[113] whereby, by grieving for sins, we flee to the mercy of God or abstain from sinning, is a sin or makes sinners worse, let him be anathema. Canon 9. If anyone says that the sinner is justified by faith alone,[114] meaning that nothing else is required to cooperate in order to obtain the grace of justification, and that it is not in any way necessary that he be prepared and disposed by the action of his own will, let him be anathema. Canon 10. If anyone says that men are justified without the justice of Christ,[115] whereby Her merited for us, or by that justice are formally just, let him be anathema.

Since Jesus spoke more on the reality of Hell than any other subject what does this Pope denying the reality of Hell say about his relationship to the Son of God?

@derDeutsche-mh2zj

7 ай бұрын

Bruh, the word hell doesn't even exist in Greek or Hebrew.

Martin Luther also wrote this: “Mary is the highest woman and the noblest gem in Christianity after Christ… She is nobility, wisdom, and holiness personified. We can never honor her enough. Still honor and praise must be given to her in such a way as to injure neither Christ nor the Scriptures.” “God has formed the soul and body of the Virgin Mary full of the Holy Spirit, so that she is without all sins, for she has conceived and borne the Lord Jesus.” “Christ, our Savior, was the real and natural fruit of Mary’s virginal womb… This was without the cooperation of a man, and she remained a virgin after that. […] Christ… was the only Son of Mary, and the Virgin Mary bore no children besides Him.” “She became the Mother of God, in which work so many and such great good things are bestowed on her as pass man’s understanding. For on this there follows all honor, all blessedness, and her unique place in the whole of mankind, among which she has no equal, namely, that she had a child by the Father in heaven, and such a Child…. “Hence men have crowded all her glory into a single word, calling her the Mother of God…. None can say of her nor announce to her greater things, even though he had as many tongues as the earth possesses flowers and blades of grass: the sky, stars; and the sea, grains of sand. It needs to be pondered in the heart what it means to be the Mother of God.”

@wanda520

Жыл бұрын

She isn’t to be worshipped.

@dougy6237

Жыл бұрын

@@wanda520 Thats right, we honour Mary, not worship her, and Luther agreed. Never the less, you accept Luthers doctrines of Sola Fide and Sola Scriptura, yet reject other doctrines of his. How reliable was Luther then?

@rickiecomeaux8287

8 ай бұрын

@@dougy6237Luther was as reliable as Rome, which is unreliable. He betrayed the poor peasantry and believed that a priest could summon Jesus from heaven and order him into a piece of bread. Luther was just a beginning to the Reformation not the god of Reformation.

@AnneofAvonlea

5 ай бұрын

@@dougy6237cognitive dissonance kicked in because Catholicism definitely does worship her.

@AnneofAvonlea

5 ай бұрын

@@dougy6237you don’t know history and are here to keep trolling and spreading Catholic propaganda. Luther was a hero and stood for Christ over a criminal world super power.

Why do the man-made confessions of Reformed Covenant Theology not contain the term "New Covenant", which is found in the Bible multiple times? New Covenant Whole Gospel: Who is now the King of Israel in John 1:49? Is the King of Israel now the Head of the Church, and are we His Body? Why did God allow the Romans to destroy the Old Covenant temple and the Old Covenant city, about 40 years after His Son fulfilled the New Covenant promised in Jeremiah 31:31-34 in blood at Calvary? What the modern Church needs is a New Covenant Revival (Heb. 9:10) in which members of various denominations are willing to re-examine everything they believe and see if it agrees with the Bible, instead of the traditions of men. We need to be like the Bereans. It will be a battle between our flesh and the Holy Spirit. It will not be easy. If you get mad and upset when someone challenges your man-made Bible doctrines, that is your flesh resisting the truth found in God's Word. Nobody can completely understand the Bible unless they understand the relationship between the Old Covenant given to Moses at Mount Sinai and the New Covenant fulfilled in blood at Calvary. What brings all local churches together into one Body under the blood of Christ? The answer is found below. Let us now share the Old Testament Gospel found below with the whole world. On the road to Emmaus He said the Old Testament is about Him. He is the very Word of God in John 1:1, 14. Awaken Church to this truth. Jer 31:31 Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah: Jer 31:32 Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by husband unto them, saith the LORD: Jer 31:33 But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the LORD, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people. Jer 31:34 And they shall teach no more every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the LORD: for they shall all know me, from the least of them unto the greatest of them, saith the LORD: for I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more. Is the most important genealogy in the Bible found in Matthew 1:1 (Gal. 3:16)? Is God's Son the ultimate fulfillment of Israel (John 1:49)? Why has the modern Church done a pitiful job of sharing the Gospel with modern Orthodox Jews? Why would someone tell them they are God's chosen people and then fail to share the Gospel with them? Who is the seed of the woman promised in Genesis 3:15? What did Paul say about Genesis 12:3 in Galatians 3:8, 3:16? Who is the "son" in Psalm 2? Who is the "suffering servant" of Isaiah 53? Who would fulfill the New Covenant promised in Jeremiah 31:31-34? Who would fulfill the timeline of Daniel chapter 9 before the second temple was destroyed? Why have we not heard this simple Old Testament Gospel preached on Christian television in the United States on a regular basis? Once a person comes to understand the New Covenant promised to Israel and Judah in Jeremiah 31:31-34, which is found fulfilled by Christ during the first century in Hebrews 8:6-13, and Hebrews 10:16-18, and specifically applied to the Church in 2 Corinthians 3:6-8, and Hebrews 12:22-24, man-made Bible doctrines fall apart. Let us now learn to preach the whole Gospel until He comes back. The King of Israel is risen from the dead! (John 1:49, Acts 2:36) We are not come to Mount Sinai in Hebrews 12:18. We are come instead to the New Covenant church of Mount Zion and the blood in Hebrews 12:22-24. 1Jn 3:22 And whatsoever we ask, we receive of him, because we keep his commandments, and do those things that are pleasing in his sight. 1Jn 3:23 And this is his commandment, That we should believe on the name of his Son Jesus Christ, and love one another, as he gave us commandment. 1Jn 3:24 And he that keepeth his commandments dwelleth in him, and he in him. And hereby we know that he abideth in us, by the Spirit which he hath given us. The following verses prove the Holy Spirit is the master teacher for those now in the New Covenant. Jer 31:34 And they shall teach no more every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the LORD: for they shall all know me, from the least of them unto the greatest of them, saith the LORD: for I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more. Mar 1:8 I indeed have baptized you with water: but he shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost. Joh 14:26 But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you. Act 11:16 Then remembered I the word of the Lord, how that he said, John indeed baptized with water; but ye shall be baptized with the Holy Ghost. 1Co 12:13 For by one Spirit are we all baptized into one body, whether we be Jews or Gentiles, whether we be bond or free; and have been all made to drink into one Spirit. 1Jn 2:27 But the anointing which ye have received of him abideth in you, and ye need not that any man teach you: but as the same anointing teacheth you of all things, and is truth, and is no lie, and even as it hath taught you, ye shall abide in him. Watch the KZread videos “The New Covenant” by David Wilkerson, or Bob George, and David H.J. Gay.

A few good ministers to point out the many errors of the Catholic Religion are Mike Gendron, Mike Winger, and Dr. James White!

@wingchun1963

5 ай бұрын

What they point out is is not the errors of the CC but their ignorance of knowing Gods church, the pillar and foundation of truth.

@spacecoastz4026

Ай бұрын

@@wingchun1963 The pillar and foundation of truth is God's Word.

@wingchun1963

Ай бұрын

@@spacecoastz4026 1 Tim 3:15 says otherwise.

@wingchun1963

Ай бұрын

@@spacecoastz4026 scripture says otherwise. 1 Tim 3:15

@spacecoastz4026

Ай бұрын

@@wingchun1963 Which says... "14 These things I write to you, though I hope to come to you shortly; 15 but if I am delayed, I write so that you may know how you ought to conduct yourself in the house of God, which is the church of the living God, the pillar and ground of the truth." What does that have to do with the Roman Catholic Church that started over 300 years later? The "church" of God are His Children...Christians.

I used to follow carlton pearson on tbn years ago. So sad what he turned out to believe.

Hey virgil, any chance you could let Jason Whitlock know the truth about the Roman Catholic Church, even if it has to happen behind the scenes of his show?

I love how you guys discuss between and among yourself the errors of the Catholic beliefs. It would appear to be more realistic if you discussed your comments with a Catholic biblical scholar. I have difficulty in seeing how protestants consider a good sermon as good worship. Simply doesn't make sense. I few praying for each other would be a good idea. It appears that each protestant has his own authority to interpet scripture as he sees fit.

I am a Christian I don’t choose sides whether it’s being a Catholic Presbyterian C of E and so forth I read the KJB diligently I love my Lord Jesus Christ God the Father and the Holy Spirit however I have noticed that many Churches are dare I say in a state of Apostasy I hope I do not offend any Brethren out there who love our Lord Jesus Christ and are true to the Gospel of Christ Jesus but we were warned by Jesus Christ that many will come like Wolves in sheep’s clothing Preaching the Gospel and even daring to shamelessly call themselves the Christ now we have individuals who are trying to change the True Gospels Narrative of our Lord Jesus Christ the WOKE Brigade and LGBTQ+ shamelessly and mock our Father god our Lord Jesus Christ and the Holy Spirit publicly in church ⛪️ I love my Brothers & Sisters but it sore grieves me to hear such mockery of a man supposedly a priest claiming that god is gay god is queer and a man dressed in drag welcoming everyone and calling our Blessed Father God the Great Queer one hold fast my Brothers & Sisters to the Holy Gospel of our Lord Jesus be blessed all of you in Jesus name Amen 🙏

@bridgefin

9 ай бұрын

You would not have been considered a Christian i the New Testament church.

When you disagree or argue with Catholics, 90 percent of the time they say something like “you just don’t understand Catholic theology” or “you are ignorant”. It’s like no dude, I fully comprehend the theology. I just completely disagree with it. Why is that so hard to understand?

Q.where in the Bible say .that we are save by faith alone We have to be in the churth and obey what she teach.Jesus teach the Apostos to teach us what to believe without the churth we can go to the Lord.so it not by feith alone.

@stever4181

3 ай бұрын

You: "where in the Bible say .that we are save by faith alone " Me: Eph 2:8-9 "For by grace you have been saved through faith, and this is not from you; it is the gift of God; it is not from works, so no one may boast.

Where and why do they take it upoun themselves to come up with so many ideas that are so obviously not from scripture and leaning on a anti christ theme, what they claim is from scripture is such a stretch as their visitisations of what they claim mary tells them or ? Just add up their fruits, the many ,many bad overshadows any seemingly good by a landslide! Very bad for mankind is what i see.All the members are so loved ,I pray for their eyes and ears to be opened.

@bridgefin

9 ай бұрын

Catholicism wrote the New Testament and you are misreading it.

John 3:5 Jesus answered, “Very truly I tell you, no one can enter the kingdom of God unless they are born of water and the Spirit.

@michaelbrunsdon8938

11 ай бұрын

Yeh Catholics are baptised jut like every other Christian.

End of the world, rapture cop -out, personal relationship gnostic heresy! Modern day new age “christian” rapture end times Dispensationalism pessimistic defeating gnostic heresy. Which has crippled our great Puritan Christian nation! A Psalm of David. The LORD said to my Lord, “Sit at My right hand, Till I make Your enemies Your footstool.” - Psalm 110:1 Orthodox Apostolic optimistic victorious eschatology! Now these Jews were more noble than those in Thessalonica; they received the word with all eagerness, examining the Scriptures daily to see if these things were so. - Acts 17:11

30:25 - I’m certain R.C Sproul must have said ‘what’s wrong with you people’

As a former Catholic, I know the Catholic church conflates salvation and sanctification, and Catholics never have assurance of salvation. Very sad.

@Bonaparte3922

Жыл бұрын

That is why one needs to work out their salvation with fear and trembling Philippians 2:12. God bless you.

@clivejames5058

9 ай бұрын

Well, Catholics do have assurance of salvation. All they have to do is die in a state of grace and not in a state of mortal sin. The latter is actually quite hard to do and you definitely know if you've killed someone or committed adultery. Really serious sins like these the apostle Paul tells us quite plainly in Corinthians will prevent us from entering the Kingdom of Heaven if we are unrepentant. If one stumbles then repent - yes through a priest (because it's a sacrament) but you're actually being forgiven by God.

@GustAdlph

9 ай бұрын

@@clivejames5058 To make a good confession, you have to be contrite and have a firm purpose of amendment, but the priest doesn't know what's in your heart, only God does.

@clivejames5058

9 ай бұрын

@@GustAdlph I would have thought that goes without saying.

I consider it a badge of honor to be hated by this godless culture. I love the Lord Jesus Christ not this evil American culture. If you're not hated you're not preaching and proclaiming the true Gospel.

Additional comments on what you said in the video: 1. Since you believe through faith alone all your sins (past, present and future) are imputed/counted on Christ and He already paid the penalty of your sins on the cross how do you reconcile it with what Heb. 10:26-27 says (ESV): “For if we go on sinning deliberately after receiving the knowledge of the truth, there no longer remains a sacrifice for sins, but a fearful expectation of judgment, and a fury of fire that will consume the adversaries.” The word "we" is first person plural and includes the person who wrote Hebrews. "Go on sinning" (ESV translation) is in Greek present tense. Scripture also says there are deadly (or mortal) and non-deadly (or venial) sins in 1 John 5:16-17. James 1:15 says (ESV): "sin when it is fully grown brings forth death”. Why would Scripture says so if all your sins were already imputed on Christ? 2. Heb. 13:10 says: "we have an altar". The word altar is related to sacrifice and sacrifice requires priests. The word "we" is first person plural and includes the person who wrote Hebrews. You need neither altar nor priests for sacrifice of praise (Heb. 13:15), neither on offering your bodies (Rom. 12:1). Jer. 33:17-18 prophesied that God will perpetuate both kingship in David's line and levitical priests offering sacrifice. Isaiah 66:21 says God will take as priests and levites from all nations. But you church has neither altar nor sacrifice nor priests because the Reformers replaced them with pulpit, sermon and minister.

@johnlee8885

Жыл бұрын

You got all you dispensations wrong James is not for church age Christians it is written for the jews RIGHTLY DIVIDE THE SCRIPTURES. CATHOLICS HAVE A FALSE GOSPEL AND ARE GOING TO HELL

@justfromcatholic

Жыл бұрын

@@johnlee8885 You wrote "The book of James is NOT for church age" How do you know? Proof it from Scripture. You turn blind eye on other issues I wrote.

@sarahd5341

Жыл бұрын

If we go on deliberately sinning that is proof we were never truly converted. I’ve heard an explanation that the “warning passages” in scripture of apostasy such as the ones you mentioned are a means God uses to keep his elect secure.

@justfromcatholic

Жыл бұрын

@@sarahd5341 The word “we” is first person plural. It even includes the person who wrote Hebrews. How can you say it refers to non-converted person? You too stilll commit sin!

@sarahd5341

Жыл бұрын

@@justfromcatholic I don’t see the issue with “we”. He was addressing an audience that would be believers and false professors. We makes sense. How do you deal with verses that clearly teach eternal security for the elect? “Jesus answered them, “I told you, and you do not believe. The works that I do in my Father’s name bear witness about me, but you do not believe because you are not among my sheep. My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me. I give them eternal life, and they will never perish, and no one will snatch them out of my hand. My Father, who has given them to me,is greater than all, and no one is able to snatch them out of the Father’s hand. I and the Father are one.”” ‭‭John‬ ‭10‬:‭25‬-‭30‬ ‭ESV‬‬

It is very sad that these two apparently sincere men are wasting their time trying to disprove the doctrines of the Catholic Church. They are pretty assured that their position is right and that of the Catholic Church wrong. Two questions: Are these men infallible in their teachings? If they are infallible, why can't I be also infallible? If they are not infallible, why should anyone listen to them at all? The second question is regarding authority: who has the final, infallible, authority to interpret scripture and to decide the authentic doctrines of the Christian faith? These questions have led me to the inevitable conclusion that it is the Church founded by Jesus which alone is infallible and has the final authority to interpret scripture and to determine Christian doctrines.

It's interesting that Christ died with the hands of the Romans then, and now Rome continues to through the mass (or they think they are).

@barbwellman6686

Жыл бұрын

St. Paul blessed bread by using Christ's words of consecration, and he told the Church that those who don't discern the Body of Christ in the Bread are heaping judgment upon themselves. Christ is the Paschal Lamb of God, the food that gives eternal life. "Truely truly, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man, you will have no life within you."

@jamestrotter3162

Жыл бұрын

@@barbwellman6686 "For by ONE offering He has made perfect forever those who are being sanctified."-Heb. 10:14.

@barbwellman6686

Жыл бұрын

@James Trotter "So He went in to stay with them. 30While He was reclining at the table with them, He took bread, spoke a blessing and broke it, and gave it to them. 31Then their eyes were opened and they recognized Jesus-and He disappeared from their sight. 32They asked each other, “Were not our hearts burning within us as He spoke with us on the road and opened the Scriptures to us?” 33And they got up that very hour and returned to Jerusalem. There they found the Eleven and those with them, gathered together 34and saying, “The Lord has indeed risen and has appeared to Simon!” 35Then the two told what had happened on the road, and how they had recognized Jesus in the breaking of the bread."

@barbwellman6686

Жыл бұрын

@James Trotter Catholics, Orthodox don't disagree with that Scripture. His Eternal Sacrifice ended the Old Testament sacrifice of goats, sheep and cattle. His New Testament is in His Body and His Blood for the forgiveness of sin. "Truly, truly, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man, you will have no life within you." Did St. Paul believe in the True Presence of Christ in the consecrated Bread? "23For I received from the Lord what I also passed on to you: The Lord Jesus, on the night He was betrayed, took bread, 24and when He had given thanks, He broke it and said, “This is My Body, which is for you; do this in remembrance of Me.” 25In the same way, after supper He took the cup, saying, “This Cup is the New Covenant in My Blood; do this, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of Me.” 26For as often as you eat this bread and drink this cup, you proclaim the Lord’s death until He comes. 27Therefore, whoever eats the Bread or drinks the Cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty of sinning against the Body and Blood of the Lord. 28Each one must examine himself before he eats of the Bread and drinks of the Cup. 29For anyone who eats and drinks without discerning the Body eats and drinks judgment on himself. 30That is why many among you are weak and sick, and a number of you have fallen asleep."

@gch8810

Жыл бұрын

Tell me you are ignorant of Catholic theology without telling me that you are ignorant of Catholic theology.

Boggles the mind how deceptive the heart is. Everything screams that Catholicism is Christianity but supposed intelligent people arrogantly deny and reject the truth like this.

@rickiecomeaux8287

8 ай бұрын

No, you are a Marian, not Christian. You belong to a matriarchy, like current-year demonrats.

@nightowl5396

4 ай бұрын

roman catholicism is a blending of pagan greek philosophy and christianity

@neilanadams5173

4 ай бұрын

@@nightowl5396 I'm sure you have done extensive study on the matter. God bless you.

All doctrines are daughters of catholicism, with the exception of the church of Christ. IT’S THE ONLY WAY CALLED STRAIT!

@ShirleyAnnPetrillo-oj7sc

8 ай бұрын

Are you perhaps referring to what’s written in Revelation about the harlot having daughters ?

@walterlahaye2128

8 ай бұрын

@@ShirleyAnnPetrillo-oj7sc , The harlot in the Book of REVELATION are the popes of Rome. The daughters of catholicism are the protestant movement, beginning with Martin Luther!

Catholicism was founded by Jesus Christ on Peter the rock and first pope. We have an unbroken succession of popes and bishops (Google "pope chart"). The first 3 popes are mentioned in the Bible. The first recorded use of the word "Catholic" comes to us from a disciple of John the Apostle, St. Ignatius of Antioch in 107: “Wherever the Bishop appears, there, let the people be, as wherever Jesus Christ is, there is the Catholic Church" (Letter to the Smyrnaeans). He also spoke about the Holy Eucharist and following the teaching of the Bishops. Remember, this was before the Catholic Church gave us the Bible in the 4th century and everyone followed the preaching and teaching of the successors of the Apostles. Protestantism is a rejection of the original and true faith that was handed on (Tradition): "So then, brethren, stand firm and hold to the traditions which you were taught by us, either by word of mouth or by letter" (2 Thess 2:15). We need both the Bible, which was given us by the authority of the Church, and the oral teaching Tradition. Protestors who follow the Bible alone think they have the Holy Spirit and yet the only thing we can be sure they have is their differing opinions, even among themselves.

@gregb6469

7 ай бұрын

You have parroted Rome's official line, but history does not support it.

@phil5457

7 ай бұрын

@@gregb6469 Cardinal Newman once said, "To be deep in history is to cease to be Protestant." The history of the early Church was clearly Catholic. The main focus of worship was Holy Communion and still is in the Catholic Church today. Protestors mostly did away with the Eucharist and decided preaching was the primary focus of worship. The problem is they have no authority given them by Christ and so they can't agree on fundamental doctrines like whether we should baptize infants or only adults. BTW, where does the Bible state that the Bible is to be our only rule of faith?

@gregb6469

7 ай бұрын

@@phil5457-- II Timothy 3:16-17 reads 'All Scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, thoroughly equipped for every good work.' If the Bible makes the man of God complete, and thoroughly equips him for every good work, then anything else is superfluous, at best, or counter-productive (like all those Romanist traditions of which there is no hint in Scripture). BTW, where does the Bible state that unwritten, secretly-passed-down traditions which are contrary to clear Scriptural teachings are to be our rule of faith?

@stever4181

6 ай бұрын

@@phil5457Where does the Bible state anything about the Catholic Church? Quite frankly your understanding of Matt. 16:18 is totally flawed. Now show me where Jesus gave authority to the Catholic Church or that it is the only rule of faith?.

@phil5457

6 ай бұрын

@@stever4181 "Where does the Bible state anything about the Catholic Church?" The same question could be asked of any church. They would all fail that test. The Bible is VERY Catholic. The teachings are there either explicitly or implicitly. And let us acknowledge that without the Catholic Church we would have no Bible. Different people would have different lists of books and gospels but no way to know who has the inspired texts. Thankfully, God gave us the teaching authority of the Church: "he who hears you hears me", "whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven", "whose sins you forgive are forgiven them". The Church under the pope decided for all time what the inspired books were to be included in the Bible. If you think the Bible is the inspired Word of God then you implicitly agree to the authority that gave us the Bible. You can't accept the canonicity of the Bible but reject the authority of the Church that gave us the Bible. "Quite frankly your understanding of Matt. 16:18 is totally flawed." Is it flawed? How so? You need to explain. The early Church certainty didn't think so. The early Church Fathers were all Catholic and followed the teaching of the Bishop of Rome. Cyprian of Carthage: "but a primacy is given to Peter, whereby it is made clear that there is but one Church and one chair. So too, all [the apostles] are shepherds, and the flock is shown to be one, fed by all the apostles in single-minded accord. If someone does not hold fast to this unity of Peter, can he imagine that he still holds the faith? If he [should] desert the chair of Peter upon whom the Church was built, can he still be confident that he is in the Church?” (The Unity of the Catholic Church 4; 1st edition [A.D. 251]). . Here is what Pope Clement I had to say: "Accept our counsel and you will have nothing to regret. . . . If anyone disobey the things which have been said by him [God] through us [i.e., that you must reinstate your leaders], let them know that they will involve themselves in transgression and in no small danger. . . . You will afford us joy and gladness if being obedient to the things which we have written through the Holy Spirit, you will root out the wicked passion of jealousy” (Letter to the Corinthians 1, 58-59, 63 [A.D. 80]). Notice the dates? "Now show me where Jesus gave authority to the Catholic Church or that it is the only rule of faith?" I already showed the primacy of Peter when he was given power to "bind" and "loose" on earth what Jesus would then "bind" and "loose" in heaven and that he was given the keys to heaven. If the words of Jesus can't convince you then I surely won't be able to. The Bible says that we are to maintain the traditions that were handed on by word of mouth or by letter (2 Thess 2:15). What were those traditions? The primary one was breaking of the bread (i.e., Communion/Eucharist). Unfortunately this was replaced by preaching in most of Protestantism. For a good understanding of early Christian worship you should read St. Justin Martyr in 155. He tells us to meet on Sundays, hear the Scriptures proclaimed and receive the Eucharist which is the "FLESH AND BLOOD of that incarnated Jesus." (First Apology 66, 20) Finally, I'd like to suggest that if you want to learn about Catholicism you should study from Catholic sources, not anti-Catholic sources. That's the approach I try to take when studying different denominations. I try to hear them out and give them a fair shake before I make my decisions on what is true and worthy of belief.

Listen to your selves. The Catholic Church is the oldest real church in the world. Through the centuries it has had many setbacks but they still resolved their problems. I’m not a preacher but I’m Catholic be leaver.

@itsenough386

3 ай бұрын

The real church is not catholic, it is composed of people, it's not a cult,just seeing the Vatican shows there's a real problem, the devil is cunning

@jilesbo9175

Ай бұрын

​@@itsenough386Your exactly. In fact the body of Christ is called the Ecclesia NOT Church. Rome is a Cult

@jilesbo9175

Ай бұрын

No WRONG! The Roman Catholic is NOT the oldest or original Christians! The original Christians were Jews! Wow

Martin Luther did not believe in sola scriptura, Mattin Luther believed the biblical doctrine that that when we partake of the bread and wine we literally partake in the body and blood of Christ and he openly opposed those who claimed it is merely symbolic, Martin Luther believed in the biblical doctrine of Infant baptism, Martin Luther believed the biblical doctrine that Mary is the mother of God. Martin Luther was right!

@bridgefin

9 ай бұрын

Luther TAUGHT Sola Scriptura. Get your facts right and stop lying!

@ShirleyAnnPetrillo-oj7sc

8 ай бұрын

Luther’s conclusion = The Correct Authority is the Word of GOD, not men (or a man). Luther was a RC cleric, imperfect, in angst, seeking truth.

@bridgefin

8 ай бұрын

@@ShirleyAnnPetrillo-oj7sc You: Luther’s conclusion = The Correct Authority is the Word of GOD, not men (or a man). Me: No, a rebellious heretic. He held himself out to be authoritative. And his position was to make ONLY Scripture authoritative but that contradicts Scripture. Scripture provides for the Holy Spirit to work through men in preaching and teaching as well.

Jesus, Mary, Joseph, Peter, and Paul were not Roman Catholics. They were all Jewish. The first non-Jewish believer in the gospel is Cornelius in Acts chapter ten. Every believer before Acts chapter ten is 100 percent Jewish. When the LORD commanded Peter to go preach the gospel to Cornelius Peter didn't want to go because he knew that Cornelius was not Jewish. The Bible, Old Testament and New Testament, was written by Jews. The LORD commanded Peter three times, "Feed My sheep" (John 21:15-17). Therefore, Peter gave the keys to the kingdom directly to the sheep and not to the magisterium. And Peter wrote to the sheep (2 Peter 1:5-11) and said, “...add to your faith virtue; and to virtue knowledge; And to knowledge temperance; and to temperance patience; and to patience godliness; And to godliness brotherly kindness; and to brotherly kindness charity. For if these things be in you, and abound, they make you that ye shall neither be barren nor unfruitful in the knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ. But he that lacketh these things is blind, and cannot see afar off, and hath forgotten that he was purged from his old sins. Wherefore the rather, brethren, give diligence to make your calling and election sure: for if ye do these things, ye shall never fall: For so an entrance shall be ministered unto you abundantly into the everlasting kingdom of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ” (2 Peter 1:5-11). In other words, Peter says that if we (the sheep) do what he says to do that this will open the doorway to heaven "abundantly" to the sheep. Peter has been feeding the sheep by sharing the keys to the kingdom with anyone who will do what he tells them to do in 2 Peter 1:5-11 and the entrance to the kingdom will be abundantly ministered to them. And they will never fall. So, why doesn't the church that says that they hold the keys to the kingdom teach their people how to have the power to live holy and the power to never fall? If you are willing to give totalitarian control of your thinking to the magisterium or to any religious group you have blinded yourself and cannot even see the scriptures that are right in front of you. On the day of judgment you will not be able to point at someone else and say, "It's their fault." It is your individual responsibility to know the scriptures. "And they shall not teach every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the Lord: for all shall know me, from the least to the greatest" (Hebrews 8:11). Peter by his personal example never acted as if having the keys to the kingdom meant asserting authority over other people. For example in Acts 15 when a very important matter was to be decided before the assembly the final verdict was given by James and not by Peter (Acts 15:19). Paul gave commandments to the churches he established and not Peter (1 Corinthians 7:17 and 16:1). Also, Paul did not take his orders from Peter. In fact Paul rebuked Peter to his face. “But when Peter was come to Antioch, I withstood him to the face, because he was to be blamed” (Galatians 2:11). The LORD commanded us saying, "...Ye know that they which are accounted to rule over the Gentiles exercise lordship over them; and their great ones exercise authority upon them. BUT SO SHALL IT NOT BE AMONG YOU: but whosoever will be great among you, shall be your minister: And whosoever of you will be the chiefest, shall be servant of all" (Mark 10:42-44). ... ... ...

@barbwellman6686

Жыл бұрын

White Roses, Acts 15:6 "The apostles and elders met to consider this question. 7 After much discussion, Peter got up and addressed them: “Brothers, you know that some time ago God made a choice among you that the Gentiles might hear from my lips the message of the gospel and believe. 8 God, who knows the heart, showed that he accepted them by giving the Holy Spirit to them, just as he did to us. 9 He did not discriminate between us and them, for he purified their hearts by faith. 10 Now then, why do you try to test God by putting on the necks of Gentiles a yoke that neither we nor our ancestors have been able to bear? 11 No! We believe it is through the grace of our Lord Jesus that we are saved, just as they are.” brew/Greek Your Content Acts 15 New International Version The Council at Jerusalem 15 Certain people came down from Judea to Antioch and were teaching the believers: “Unless you are circumcised, according to the custom taught by Moses, you cannot be saved.” 2 This brought Paul and Barnabas into sharp dispute and debate with them. So Paul and Barnabas were appointed, along with some other believers, to go up to Jerusalem to see the apostles and elders about this question. 3 The church sent them on their way, and as they traveled through Phoenicia and Samaria, they told how the Gentiles had been converted. This news made all the believers very glad. 4 When they came to Jerusalem, they were welcomed by the church and the apostles and elders, to whom they reported everything God had done through them. 5 Then some of the believers who belonged to the party of the Pharisees stood up and said, “The Gentiles must be circumcised and required to keep the law of Moses.” 6 The apostles and elders met to consider this question. 7 After much discussion, Peter got up and addressed them: “Brothers, you know that some time ago God made a choice among you that the Gentiles might hear from my lips the message of the gospel and believe. 8 God, who knows the heart, showed that he accepted them by giving the Holy Spirit to them, just as he did to us. 9 He did not discriminate between us and them, for he purified their hearts by faith. 10 Now then, why do you try to test God by putting on the necks of Gentiles a yoke that neither we nor our ancestors have been able to bear? 11 No! We believe it is through the grace of our Lord Jesus that we are saved, just as they are.” 12 The whole assembly became silent as they listened to Barnabas and Paul telling about the signs and wonders God had done among the Gentiles through them. 13 When they finished, James spoke up. “Brothers,” he said, “listen to me. 14 Simon has described to us how God first intervened to choose a people for his name from the Gentiles. 15 The words of the prophets are in agreement with this, as it is written: 16 “‘After this I will return and rebuild David’s fallen tent. Its ruins I will rebuild, and I will restore it, 17 that the rest of mankind may seek the Lord, even all the Gentiles who bear my name, says the Lord, who does these things’ - 18 things known from long ago.

@whiterosesforthebrideofchrist

Жыл бұрын

@@barbwellman6686 Yes, Peter had something to say at the council at Jerusalem but James made the final decision.

@barbwellman6686

Жыл бұрын

@White Roses for the Bride of Christ Christ first gave St. Peter the dream about "clean and unclean" and his encounter with Cornelius: "44 While Peter was still speaking these words, the Holy Spirit came on all who heard the message. 45 The circumcised believers who had come with Peter were astonished that the gift of the Holy Spirit had been poured out even on Gentiles. 46 For they heard them speaking in tongues and praising God. Then Peter said, 47 “Surely no one can stand in the way of their being baptized with water. They have received the Holy Spirit just as we have.” 48 So he ordered that they be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ. Then they asked Peter to stay with them for a few days.

@barbwellman6686

Жыл бұрын

@White Roses for the Bride of Christ Christ changed Simon's name to Peter when He entrusted him with the keys: Matthew 16:19 I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven; whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven.”

@dougy6237

Жыл бұрын

Martin Luther also wrote this: “Mary is the highest woman and the noblest gem in Christianity after Christ… She is nobility, wisdom, and holiness personified. We can never honor her enough. Still honor and praise must be given to her in such a way as to injure neither Christ nor the Scriptures.” “God has formed the soul and body of the Virgin Mary full of the Holy Spirit, so that she is without all sins, for she has conceived and borne the Lord Jesus.” “Christ, our Savior, was the real and natural fruit of Mary’s virginal womb… This was without the cooperation of a man, and she remained a virgin after that. […] Christ… was the only Son of Mary, and the Virgin Mary bore no children besides Him.” “She became the Mother of God, in which work so many and such great good things are bestowed on her as pass man’s understanding. For on this there follows all honor, all blessedness, and her unique place in the whole of mankind, among which she has no equal, namely, that she had a child by the Father in heaven, and such a Child…. “Hence men have crowded all her glory into a single word, calling her the Mother of God…. None can say of her nor announce to her greater things, even though he had as many tongues as the earth possesses flowers and blades of grass: the sky, stars; and the sea, grains of sand. It needs to be pondered in the heart what it means to be the Mother of God.”

I would challenge you to have this conversation with a Catholic theologian on air. Especially since the determination was not one of disagreement but instead claims of heresy. It is easy to pick apart theology when only looking at the statement and not understanding what scriptures were used to build those statements. I had to get out of my own echo chamber of Protestants to find that I was incorrect about many doctrines of our Catholic brothers and sisters in Christ.

@johnlee8885

Жыл бұрын

I'll argue with him anyday

@bman5257

Жыл бұрын

They would be soundly refuted if a knowledgeable Catholic was on the show that’s why they make sure it’s just them. The blind leading the blind.

@philosophicalneo

Жыл бұрын

yea just another showmanship and business model for $$$... complain about tithes and indulgences but sit back collecting dough while preaching heresy themselves the blatant hypocrisy in 18:20 to know where you are in history and remember those who came before you... that sounds a lot like tradition to me... and that is exactly what was upheld by the early Church with the veneration of Saint's relics (first recorded with Saint Polycarp) So yes... know where you are in history... and see through the lens of the earliest Christians... All protestants are in error - this is truth

@user-hd2lp2bw7y

Жыл бұрын

I agree , I want to hear both sides of an issue. At least someone who can present the other side well, don’t hear that here.

@angelinasalo2863

Жыл бұрын

@@philosophicalneo even history tells us that we should leave Catholicism..

If you watch the debate between James White and Robert Sugenis regarding the Mass, Mr Sugenis explains that it is not a new sacrifice. He does a lot of word gymnastics to get to the point. Nevertheless, he says the official teaching is that it is the SAME sacrifice being re-presented. I always wondered how they explained the fact that since scripture says without the shedding of blood there is no remission of sins, how the Mass is beneficial since it is considered a “bloodless sacrifice.” Now I know. They say it is not a re-sacrifice, or a new sacrifice, but a re-presenting of the original. Brother!!!!🙄

@wingchun1963

5 ай бұрын

How is it Christ's redemptive work was accomplished yet in Rev he is seen as a lamb that has been slain?.

@cynthiahunter2570

5 ай бұрын

@@wingchun1963 That’s a misapplication. We remember the sacrifice; we don’t re-present it.

@wingchun1963

5 ай бұрын

@@cynthiahunter2570 you haven't explained to me why John sees Jesus as a bloody sacrifice in heaven.

In Luther's Bible, he added the word 'alone' after faith to Romans 3:28 so that it read: "So halten wir nun dafür, dass der Mensch gerecht werde ohne des Gesetzes Werke, allein durch den Glauben" "We therefore conclude that a man is justified without the works of the law, only through faith").

@dougy6237

Жыл бұрын

Martin Luther also wrote this: “Mary is the highest woman and the noblest gem in Christianity after Christ… She is nobility, wisdom, and holiness personified. We can never honor her enough. Still honor and praise must be given to her in such a way as to injure neither Christ nor the Scriptures.” “God has formed the soul and body of the Virgin Mary full of the Holy Spirit, so that she is without all sins, for she has conceived and borne the Lord Jesus.” “Christ, our Savior, was the real and natural fruit of Mary’s virginal womb… This was without the cooperation of a man, and she remained a virgin after that. […] Christ… was the only Son of Mary, and the Virgin Mary bore no children besides Him.” “She became the Mother of God, in which work so many and such great good things are bestowed on her as pass man’s understanding. For on this there follows all honor, all blessedness, and her unique place in the whole of mankind, among which she has no equal, namely, that she had a child by the Father in heaven, and such a Child…. “Hence men have crowded all her glory into a single word, calling her the Mother of God…. None can say of her nor announce to her greater things, even though he had as many tongues as the earth possesses flowers and blades of grass: the sky, stars; and the sea, grains of sand. It needs to be pondered in the heart what it means to be the Mother of God.”

@philosophicalneo

Жыл бұрын

the blatant hypocrisy in 18:20 to know where you are in history and remember those who came before you... that sounds a lot like tradition to me... and that is exactly what was upheld by the early Church with the veneration of Saint's relics (first recorded with Saint Polycarp) So yes... know where you are in history... and see through the lens of the earliest Christians... All protestants are in error - this is truth

@albertdevasahayam6781

Жыл бұрын

@@philosophicalneo Protestants forever contradict themselves. Some of their basic premises are absolutely wrong.

@mitchellosmer1293

10 ай бұрын

@@dougy6237 quote--Martin Luther also wrote this: “Mary is the highest woman and the noblest gem in Christianity after Christ… She is nobility, wisdom, and holiness personified. We can never honor her enough. Still honor and praise must be given to her in such a way as to injure neither Christ nor the Scriptures.”--unquote So, you prefer to trust in the words of a mere man and Not God?? ****"honor her enough?? WE are supposed to give HONOR to God--not to a created being!!! ------Mankind Has Failed to Honor God Despite the ultimate sacrifice God made in giving up His only Son for us, mankind, in general, has failed to honor God with the respect and honor that He deserves. The Bible records occurrences where humans apostatized by worshiping foreign idols and disregarding God’s laws. In Job 6:5-6, God was troubled by the wickedness of the people and even regretted creating humans. When Moses went to Mount Sinai to receive God’s commandments, the Israelites turned from God and worshiped a golden calf idol made from molten jewelry and ornaments. With all that being considered, is it not only right then that we honor the One who took us out of the darkness of despair, saved us from eternal damnation, and gave us new hope through the light of His forgiving mercy and grace? However, what does it mean to “honor” God? Why Should We Honor God? King David wrote in Psalm 27:14 (AMPC), “What, what would have become of me had I not believed that I would see the Lord’s goodness in the land of the living!” God loved us before we loved Him by sacrificing His only Son Jesus for us. If not for His sacrifice on the Cross, we would still be held spiritually captive by our own sins and be destined to spend eternity in damnation under the will of Satan. Isn’t that reason enough to honor Him? Mankind Has Failed to Honor God Despite the ultimate sacrifice God made in giving up His only Son for us, mankind, in general, has failed to honor God with the respect and honor that He deserves. Honoring God also means that we submit to His ways and know that He has a good and wonderful plan for our lives (John 10:10). This requires that we walk in obedience with Him and trust His ways, even when we don’t understand why bad things are happening to us. Lastly, and most importantly, to honor God means to not only respect Him for what He does for us but to love Him for who He is. --******quote---“God has formed the soul and body of the Virgin Mary full of the Holy Spirit, so that she is without all sins, for she has conceived and borne the Lord Jesus.” --unquote OPINION--NO scripture!! btw--God says: Romans 3:23-24 For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God; 24 Being justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus: (NO EXCEPTIONS!!) ****quote--“Christ, our Savior, was the real and natural fruit of Mary’s virginal womb… This was without the cooperation of a man, and she remained a virgin after that. […] Christ… was the only Son of Mary, and the Virgin Mary bore no children besides Him.”--unquote NOT according to the Bible!! As an ordinary part of the human race, born into the world the ordinary way, Mary was not without sin. Romans 3:23 teaches that all have sinned and fall short of God’s glory, and there is nothing in the Bible to suggest that Mary was an exception to this rule. The apostle John wrote, “If we claim to be without sin, we deceive ourselves and the truth is not in us. If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just and will forgive us our sins and purify us from all unrighteousness. If we claim we have not sinned, we make him out to be a liar and his word is not in us” (1 John 1:8-10). The “we” in this passage includes Mary, the mother of Jesus. To claim Mary is without sin is an example of “deceit.” **** How many brothers and sisters did Jesus have? The brothers of Jesus or the adelphoi (Greek: ἀδελφοί, translit. adelphoí, lit. "of the same womb") are named in the New Testament as James, Joses (a form of Joseph), Simon, and Jude, and unnamed sisters are mentioned in Mark and Matthew. AGAIN--OF THE SAME WOMB!!!!------half siblings CAN NOT be of the SAME WOMB!!!!!---unless Mary remarried after Joseph died, and HAD MORE CHILDREN!!! Which again means she did NOT remain a virgin. AND----1 Corinthians 7:5 Do not deprive each other except perhaps by mutual consent and for a time, so that you may devote yourselves to prayer. Then come together again so that Satan will not tempt you because of your lack of self-control. --If Mary had no sex with Joseph, she then IS DISOBEYING GOD!!! THAT MAKES HER A SINNER!!!!! ****quote---“She became the Mother of God, --unquote Nope--God has NO beginning--NO END!! And God is the creator!! How can Mary be both a creation of God and be the mother of God?? ****

@mitchellosmer1293

10 ай бұрын

@@philosophicalneo quote---All protestants are in error - this is truth-unquote REally? So, all Catholics are the ONLY ones that follow the truth?? Are these verses truth or error?? Biblical Proof the seventh day (Saturday) IS the Sabbath Matt 27:62 The next day, the one after Preparation Day....... Mat 28:1 In the end of the sabbath, as it began to dawn toward the first day of the week, c Mark 15:42 - It was Preparation Day (that is, the day before the Sabbath). Mark 16:1-2 - When the Sabbath was over, Mark 16:9 When Jesus rose early on the first day of the week Luke 23:54 It was Preparation Day, and the Sabbath was about to begin Luke 23:56 Then they went home and prepared spices and perfumes. But they rested on the Sabbath in obedience to the commandment. Luke 24:1 On the first day of the week, very early in the morning, .... John 19:31 Now since it was preparation day, in order that the bodies might not remain on the cross on the sabbath, for the sabbath day of that week was a solemn one, John 19:42 o because of the Jewish day of Preparation, since the tomb was close at hand, they laid Jesus there. 42 And so, because it was the day of preparation for the Jewish Passover John 20:1 The first day of the week cometh Mary Magdalene early, when it was yet dark, unto the sepulchre, btw---Matt --14:19----- Jesus "broke bread"--Communion?? No. they ate bread and fish. --How about these? Catholics claim Sunday is a holy day made by God. I will ask these questions again which NO ONE can answer. And I know you will NOT!!! Where in the Holy Bible does GOD say HE RESTED on the First day of Creation?--(to make the day special). Where in the Holy Bible does GOD say HE BLESSED the First day of the week ?--(to make the day special). Where in the Holy Bible does GOD say HE SANCTIFIED the First day of the week ?--(to make the day special). Where in the Holy Bible does GOD say HE NAMED the First day of the week ?--(to make the day special). Where in the Holy Bible does GOD say HE DECLARES the First day of the week as HIS HOLY DAY?--(to make the day special). FACTS: The ONLY DAY GOD RESTED on---7th day. The ONLY DAY GOD BLESSED---7th day. The ONLY DAY GOD SANCTIFIED---7th day. The ONLY DAY GOD named--7th day.-Sabbath -Isaiah 58:13 The ONLY DAY GOD DECLARES AS HIS HOLY DAY------7th day---Sabbath--Isaiah 58:13 .Quote the Holy Bible and prove me wrong!!! (When a law is once enacted by proper Authority, that law must remain in force until that same Authority repeals it; and the repeal must be as plainly stated as the original enactment." - anonymous)

Calvinism is HRRESY Too !

the blatant hypocrisy in 18:20 to know where you are in history and remember those who came before you... that sounds a lot like tradition to me... and that is exactly what was upheld by the early Church with the veneration of Saint's relics (first recorded with Saint Polycarp) So yes... know where you are in history... and see through the lens of the earliest Christians... All protestants are in error - this is truth

If you cannot even get the name of the church correct in the title, then how can you expect anyone to take the actual content seriously? There is no such thing as the "Roman Catholic Church" - the term is used as a slur against the church by people too lazy or too embarrassed to raise actual objections to the ancient teachings of the church.

@ShirleyAnnPetrillo-oj7sc

8 ай бұрын

Questions: Wasn’t Rome once 1 of 5 areas (churches) where believers lived & gathered having some organization and some bishop-level leadership ? How & Why did only the church in Rome get to be supreme ? That’s where all the action was ~ That’s where where all the popes ruled from (few exceptions) ~ History reports political & financial crimes, corruption & collusion and plenty of sexual activity & lots of violence and much decision making changes coming from within the church of Rome. There were always those who questioned & critiqued & disapproved of what was happening inside that church. Weren’t those “protesters” aka whistleblowers punished by order from the church in Rome? Roman Catholic Church has earned itself quite a reputation, including the recent exposure of ongoing, systematic sex abuse + the ongoing cover ups of the sexual abuse. Sins on top of sins. Some people stayed loyal. Some people existed. Some people lost their faith. Some people don’t care Babylon was another name given to Rome. “Mystery Babylon” may be a religion more than a place ? Some believe RCC is the one true church. Some believe it’s Satan’s church. Some believe it’s just another denomination of Christianity. The Great Falling Away is on display.

Ecclesiasticus and Wisdom were written by King Solomon. (The king who was inspired by God).

This is timely and needs to be discussed frequently. I literally just started a video after this (Blaze TV/Jaco Booyens) and he just called Roman Catholicism a denomination.

@barbwellman6686

Жыл бұрын

Denominationalism began 1,500 years after Christ established His Church. That Church went into schism in the year 1000 divided the body into the Orthodox and the Catholic Churches.

@bman5257

Жыл бұрын

I’m a Catholic. But one of the many big flaws in Protestantism is that it can’t settle what’s a heresy or not. Many Protestants say Catholics are saved, many say they are not. We have faith so we should be saved by our faith alone, irrespective of our doctrinal works according to Protestantism, but that’s where many Protestants are inconsistent. Protestantism is 1500 years newer than the Bible, so the Bible is silent on the salvation of Catholics from a Protestant perspective so you can’t actually answer this question sola scriptura. If you think Catholics aren’t a denomination you contradict John Calvin. “The name of God is indeed called indiscriminately on all, who are deemed his people. As it was formerly given to the whole seed of Abraham, so it is at this day conferred on all who are consecrated to his name by holy baptism, and who boast themselves to be Christians and the sons of the Church; and this belongs even to the Papists" -John Calvin

@philosophicalneo

Жыл бұрын

calling Catholicism a denomination is ridiculous... it is the only True faith and is in its entirety Christianity, all others are watered down or perverted versions of it. Just watch youtube videos of a Catholic Mass and compare it to lutherans, presbyterians, or even the fake grape juice and cookie handed out by baptists they all simulate and imitate the true form of worship - which is, has been, and will only be the Mass

@mitchellosmer1293

10 ай бұрын

@@philosophicalneo quote---calling Catholicism a denomination is ridiculous...it is the only True faith and is in its entirety Christianity,-- unquote Nope--To both statements ---O the only true faith? LOL--ROFL--- THe why do you refuse to keep the Ten Commandments as written by God????? ESpecially the Sabbath Commandment!!! ---quote--is in its entirety Christianity,---unquote NOA CHRISTIAN--A FOLLOWER of the TEACHINGS of Christ, thus the name "Christ". A Catholic--a FOLLOWER of the TEACHINGS of Catholicism!!! ----Catholics claim Sunday is a holy day made by God. I will ask these questions again which NO ONE can answer. And I know you will NOT!!! Where in the Holy Bible does GOD say HE RESTED on the First day of Creation?--(to make the day special). Where in the Holy Bible does GOD say HE BLESSED the First day of the week ?--(to make the day special). Where in the Holy Bible does GOD say HE SANCTIFIED the First day of the week ?--(to make the day special). Where in the Holy Bible does GOD say HE NAMED the First day of the week ?--(to make the day special). Where in the Holy Bible does GOD say HE DECLARES the First day of the week as HIS HOLY DAY?--(to make the day special). FACTS: The ONLY DAY GOD RESTED on---7th day. The ONLY DAY GOD BLESSED---7th day. The ONLY DAY GOD SANCTIFIED---7th day. The ONLY DAY GOD named--7th day.-Sabbath -Isaiah 58:13 The ONLY DAY GOD DECLARES AS HIS HOLY DAY------7th day---Sabbath--Isaiah 58:13 .Quote the Holy Bible and prove me wrong!!! (When a law is once enacted by proper Authority, that law must remain in force until that same Authority repeals it; and the repeal must be as plainly stated as the original enactment." - anonymous) (((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((

@medic4christ777

8 ай бұрын

@@bman5257 Well Firstly, Calvin is wrong about his designation of the "seed of Abraham" as Calvin has been wrong about a lot. Galatians 3 says that the seed of Abraham is ONE person, not many. The seed of Abraham is Christ. Secondly, as a Catholic, if you hold to that doctrine, it is not a matter of HAVING faith. It is a matter of what your faith is in. The Jews had faith too. Were they saved? Your faith is in tradition, the church, Mary, the sacraments. It's not in Christ. Your faith is in religion.

The 2000 year old Orthodox Church doesn't believe in Once Saved Always Saved.

@bman5257

Жыл бұрын

No one did until John Calvin

@josephk4310

Жыл бұрын

Augustine did.

@barbwellman6686

Жыл бұрын

@Archangel M Actually, no he didn't. itsjustdave1988.blogspot.com/2005/07/did-augustine-teach-eternal-security.html?m=1

@bman5257

Жыл бұрын

@@josephk4310 [Buzzer sound]! Incorrect! Thanks for playing “Let’s see a Calvinist pretend Augustine’s on his side”. Judges reveal your score: If, however, being already regenerate and justified, he relapses of his own will into an evil life, assuredly he cannot say, “I have not received,” because of his own free choice to evil he has lost the grace of God that he had received -St. Augustine (On Rebuke and Grace, ch. 9). Better luck next time!

@bman5257

Жыл бұрын

@@josephk4310 Let’s see our results for the bonus round: “[A]lthough they were living well, [they] have not persevered therein; because they have of their own will been changed from a good to an evil life, and on that account are worthy of rebuke; and if rebuke should be of no avail to them, and they should persevere in their ruined life until death, they are also worthy of divine condemnation forever. Neither shall they excuse themselves, saying-as now they say, ‘Why are we rebuked?’-so then, ‘Why are we condemned, since indeed, that we might return from good to evil, we did not receive that perseverance by which we should abide in good?’ They shall by no means deliver themselves by this excuse from righteous condemnation” (Admonition and Grace 11 [A.D. 426]). “[N]othing could have been devised more likely to instruct and benefit the pious reader of sacred Scripture than that, besides describing praiseworthy characters as examples, and blameworthy characters as warnings, it should also narrate cases where good men have gone back and fallen into evil, whether they are restored to the right path or continue irreclaimable; and also where bad men have changed, and have attained to goodness, whether they persevere in it or relapse into evil; in order that the righteous may be not lifted up in the pride of security, nor the wicked hardened in despair of cure” (Against Faustus 22:96 [A.D. 400]).

Please stop saying "right" literally every five seconds. It's great if you already know everything that Josh is saying, but there's an entire audience also listening who may not... and that is very distracting. Also, great podcast :) Thank you for doing this

@Fetsimo

Жыл бұрын

I agree, super annoying and unnecessary.

@HearGodsWord

Жыл бұрын

I know, right.

@G3Ministries

Жыл бұрын

Right.

@TheRealBertMoog

Жыл бұрын

@@G3Ministries :)

@staza1

Жыл бұрын

I actually like how you keep saying right. You are supporting and affirming him. Don't change anything. Just be yourself. Right, right, right, right, right 😅

Fr. Martin Luther was an ordained Catholic priest and professor who taught theology at Wittenberg University.

@endtimesareuponus8930

Жыл бұрын

So. He became an ex Catholic.

Someone who is a devout Catholic, can not be Christian, the same as a Catholic who believes in Faith alone, in Christ alone, and His Word, alone, can not call themselves a Catholic because it is an unspoken rule of the Roman Church that who ever believes such is cursed, and automatically ex-communicated without notice. The reason this is not a SPOKEN rule, is because their isles would be empty and their coffers broke. If you watch many of the "Why I left Catholicism" video's, you'll see that most of them leave the Catholic church because the differences, they do not remain as Christians, attending Catholic processions, as the Holy Spirit is guiding them to the Truth which can't be found in true Catholicism.

Why on Earth are you even mentioning Joel Osteen as a preacher, let alone a christian?? He has called so many Souls away from God and the bible. When you mention his name like that some people will think that you may or may not approve with some of his teachings. I don't even want to listen to the rest of your talk. I'm so disappointed

The seven books of the Old Testament (eventually removed from Protestant bibles) were part of the Jewish Old Testament written in Greek called the Septuaguint. Those books include: Baruch, Judith, 1 and 2 Maccabees, Sirach, Tobit and Wisdom. The canon of Scripture had already been determined at the synod of Hippo, North Africa, in 393 AD by 300 bishops.

@philosophicalneo

Жыл бұрын

protestants have no sense of time regarding church history nor the guidance of the Holy Spirit... they think somehow a 16th century English rendition is the most appropriate doctrinal document while countless biblical narratives and teachings discredit protestants... the issue of bible reception is key. It is easy to prove the protestant bible is 'abridged' at best, thus they are in error, and if that is the case... then to a scholarly and inquisitive Christian, one would mainly be led to Roman Catholicism or even Eastern Orthodoxy as a good starting point to understanding true Christianity.

@mitchellosmer1293

10 ай бұрын

quote---The seven books of the Old Testament (eventually removed from Protestant bibles) were part of the Jewish Old Testament written in Greek called the Septuaguint. Those books include: Baruch, Judith, 1 and 2 Maccabees, Sirach, Tobit and Wisdom.--unquote ------Nope--The OT was written in Aramaic and Hebrew!!! NOT Greek!!!! Biblical Hebrew The Jewish Bible, the Old Testament, was originally written almost entirely in Hebrew, with a few short elements in Aramaic. -----Is the OT in Greek or Hebrew? Written in Hebrew between the 11th and 2nd centuries BCE, the Hebrew Bible, known as the Old Testament in the Christian tradition, is a very special product of the Ancient Near East. ----Apparently you are telling lies!!!!! ****I have read parts of 1 Maccabees--and it totally contradicted what we accept as the Holy Bible!!!!!! ---Why would anyone want "books"; that CONTRADICT what IS accepted as truth to be inserted into the Bible???

@barbwellman6686

10 ай бұрын

Septuaguint "...a Greek version of the Hebrew Bible (or Old Testament), including the Apocrypha, made for Greek-speaking Jews in Egypt in the 3rd and 2nd centuries BC and adopted by the early Christian Churches. The Hebrew canon has three divisions: the Torah (Law), the Neviʾim (Prophets), and the Ketuvim (Writings). The Septuagint has four: law, history, poetry, and prophets, with the books of the Apocrypha inserted where appropriate." "Ptolemy Philadelphus (reigned from 285-246 BCE), commissioned a translation of the Hebrew Bible for his library in Alexandria. Seventy-two translators from Jerusalem were subsequently sent to the Island of Pharos to translate the Torah into Greek. The term Septuagint, meaning “seventy,” actually refers to the seventy-two translators-six from each tribe of Israel-involved in translating the Pentateuch from Hebrew to Greek in the third-century BCE (seventy-two is rounded down to seventy, hence the Roman numeral LXX). The rest of the Hebrew Bible was translated from Hebrew to Greek by various hands over the next century or so."

@rickiecomeaux8287

8 ай бұрын

Those books you listed were NEVER stored or "layed-up" in the Jewish temple; hence, it is NOT part of the Tanakh. In fact it is STILL to this day NOT part of the Tanakh. Jesus nor his apostles EVER quoted from those books nor did they rebuke the Pharisees for excluding those books.

@barbwellman6686

8 ай бұрын

@@rickiecomeaux8287 Matthew 4:4 Wisdom 16:26 Matthew 4:15 1 Maccabees 5:15 Matthew 5:18 Baruch 4:1 Matthew 5:28 Sirach 9:8 Matthew 5:2ss Sirach 25:7-12 Matthew 5:4 Sirach 48:24 Matthew 6:7 Sirach 7:14 Matthew 6:9 Sirach 23:1, 4 Matthew 6:10 1 Maccabees 3:60 Matthew 6:12 Sirach 28:2 Matthew 6:13 Sirach 33:1 Matthew 6:20 Sirach 29:10s Matthew 6:23 Sirach 14:10 Matthew 6:33 Wisdom 7:11 Matthew 7:12 Tobit 4:15 Matthew 7:12 Sirach 31:15 Matthew 7:16 Sirach 27:6 Matthew 8:11 Baruch 4:37 Matthew 8:21 Tobit 4:3 Matthew 9:36 Judith 11:19 Matthew 9:38 1 Maccabees 12:17 Matthew 10:16 Sirach 13:17 Matthew 11:14 Sirach 48:10 Matthew 11:22 Judith 16:17 Matthew 11:25 Tobit 7:17 Matthew 11:25 Sirach 51:1 Matthew 11:28 Sirach 24:19 Matthew 11:28 Sirach 51:23 Matthew 11:29 Sirach 6:24s Matthew 11:29 Sirach 6:28s Matthew 11:29 Sirach 51:26s Matthew 12:4 2 Maccabees 10:3 Matthew 12:5 Sirach 40:15 Matthew 13:44 Sirach 20:30s Matthew 16:18 Wisdom 16:13 Matthew 16:22 1 Maccabees 2:21 Matthew 16:27 Sirach 35:22 Matthew 17:11 Sirach 48:10 Matthew 18:10 Tobit 12:15 Matthew 20:2 Tobit 5:15 Matthew 22:13 Wisdom 17:2 Matthew 23:38 Tobit 14:4 Matthew 24:15 1 Maccabees 1:54 Matthew 24:15 2 Maccabees 8:17 Matthew 24:16 1 Maccabees 2:28 Matthew 25:35 Tobit 4:17 Matthew 25:36 Sirach 7:32-35 Matthew 26:38 Sirach 37:2 Matthew 27:24 Daniel 13:46 Matthew 27:43 Wisdom 2:13 Matthew 27:43 Wisdom 2:18-20

So.... perhaps you can help me here: 1) Catholics are Christians because they believe and trust in the life, death and resurrection of Jesus Christ (2) the Catholic Church is the Church Jesus started by giving the keys of the Kingdom of Heaven to the apostle Peter (1st Bishop of Rome) and which he said would never pass away (Mt 16:18); (3) when Scripture speaks of Christians it speaks of every church member as a Christian, no matter what his “walk with God” may be like; and (4) Christians throughout history have always recognized baptism as the method by which one becomes a Christian. It was not until after the Protestant Reformation was underway that people denied this.

@ShirleyAnnPetrillo-oj7sc

8 ай бұрын

Literacy wasn’t common among the common people, right? They depended on (had to trust) Clerics to teach them, right? Who did and Who didn’t OBEY Savior JESUS who instructed His apostles & disciples SPREAD THE GOSPEL ?? Q: Who hid the Word of God (Scripture) from the common people as it was written for 15 Centuries ? A: It wasn’t non-catholic Christians aka Reformers aka Protestants.

@clivejames5058

8 ай бұрын

@@ShirleyAnnPetrillo-oj7sc Yes, most of the population prior to 15th century was illiterate which was why the Church used art to record Bible stories to help teach The Word of God (songs, paintings, statues, stained glass windows) to the populace . Each Bible had to be made by hand and took a very long time. Fortunately the invention of the Printing Press changed all that and the first English NT Bible was a Catholic one, produced in 1582 (the Protestant KJV being produced later, in 1611). God has always used sinners to spread the Gospel - not just Peter but especially Paul.

Quit saying “right, yep right “ makes it hard to understand speaker.

Dr. Laurence Vance, in his book entitled _The Dark Side of Calvinism_, details the extent of Roman Catholic false teaching/practice that originated with Calvin's hero Augustine. Perplexing to me how many Calvinists who oppose Roman Catholic teaching also honor Augustine as one of the "great heroes of the faith."

@gregb6469

7 ай бұрын

Do you follow only those who, in your view, are 100% correct on every issue? Augustine may have been wrong in his ecclesiology, but does that mean everything he taught on all issues was wrong?

@williammarinelli2363

7 ай бұрын

@@gregb6469 While both questions merit a negative response as asked, the converse could be applied - a conclusion that a minister/ministry/congregation's influence should be shunned requires that they be 100% incorrect on every issue? When a fat English monarch wanted to trade in his wife for a newer model, the pope was right to oppose it. So sometimes Protestantism gets it wrong while Roman Catholicism is right, even though I align with basic premise of the video and the evidence provided to substantiate. Bishop Fulton Sheen said, "If Christ doesn't let you in by the door, Mary can let you in through the window." I trace this sort of Mariolatry as co-redemptress back to Augustine's proposition that she was sinless. And since sexuality in marriage (except for procreative purposes) was shameful in Augustine's mind, the false doctrine of her perpetual virginity was also advocated by him. I consider this Mariolatry as soul-damning when taken seriously by they who are led astray from "entering to go in" the kingdom in the words of Matt 23:13 for the last several centuries. So errors in Augustine's "ecclesiology" have contributed to the damnation of multitudes. The same damage cannot be ascribed, imho, to a disagreement of premillennialism vs amillennialism so therefore I have a more vivi e lascia vivere attitude on this sort of eschatological dispute. While I consider him "behind the 8 ball" on any matter related to the salvation of the soul, the positions of Augustine that influenced Calvin should be evaluated on their own merit just as much as Pope Clement's concerning Henry's divorce. I happen to be in disagreement with Augustine and Calvin on all that which can be attributed nowadays as distinctively Calvinistic. But since the first thing I posted was a favorable citation of Vance's book, which is recommended, this is unsurprising. I appreciate being put on the spot - thanks.

Protestants: “You don’t need the Pope or Tradition to tell you what the Bible says!” Also Protestants: “Please listen to RC Sproul! Everything will become so clear!”

@KnightFel

Жыл бұрын

Nice strawman bro!! 🤙🏽🤙🏽🤙🏽

@LightOfAllMankind

Жыл бұрын

@@KnightFel Protestants: “something something traditions of men” Also Protestants: “Have you read Calvin’s Institute’s? Omg it’s sooo based!”

@KnightFel

Жыл бұрын

@@LightOfAllMankind Nice straw man bro!! You’re on a roll, keep ‘em coming! 🤙🏽🤙🏽🤙🏽

@LightOfAllMankind

Жыл бұрын

@@KnightFel I understand perfectly. It’s only ok when you guys do it. Anybody else y’all be like… “mUh vAiN ChRaDishUnz”

@LightOfAllMankind

Жыл бұрын

@@KnightFel thank the Lord that German, Swiss and French reformers came along to properly “exegete” the texts while disagreeing with each other and ordering the murder of each others followers… …those guys from the first 1,000 years were just fallible men amirite?

Take a few minutes to read Trent. The reason for each anathema statement on justification is backed up with paragraphs from Sacred Scripture.

@rickiecomeaux8287

8 ай бұрын

Name one person on the council of Trent or Nicaea that believed in the heavenly assumption of Mary?

@barbwellman6686

8 ай бұрын

@rickiecomeaux8287 The Early Church knew the value of relics: God did extraordinary miracles through Paul, so that even handkerchiefs and aprons that had touched him were taken to the sick, and their illnesses were cured and the evil spirits left them. (Acts 19 v 11-12). Acts 5 15As a result, people brought the sick into the streets and laid them on cots and mats, so that at least Peter’s shadow might fall on some of them as he passed by. 16Crowds also gathered from the towns around Jerusalem, bringing the sick and those tormented by unclean spirits, and all of them were healed. 17Then the high priest and all his associates, who belonged to the party of the Sadducees, were filled with jealousy. They went out 18and arrested the apostles and put them in the public jail. Jews collected the bones of their dead and placed them in ossuary boxes. The Mother of God's burial tomb was empty when the time came for the transfer of bones.

@barbwellman6686

8 ай бұрын

@rickiecomeaux8287 The Dormition of the Mother of God is a Great Feast of the Eastern Orthodox, Oriental Orthodox, and both the Eastern and Western Catholic Churches It celebrates the "falling asleep" (death) of Mary the Theotokos ("Mother of God", literally translated as God-bearer), and her being taken up into heaven. It is celebrated on 15 August (28 August N.S. in the Julian Calendar) as the Feast of the Dormition of the Mother of God. The Armenian Apostolic Church celebrates the Dormition not on a fixed date, but on the Sunday nearest 15 August.

@rickiecomeaux8287

8 ай бұрын

@@barbwellman6686I don't care how you rationalize your heresy or the multitude that are deceived by it. The gate to salvation is narrow; hence, it accommodates a few people. Most people will take the wide gate which is easier to pass through. Satan deceives the WORLD, which will be the majority of people. Also a majority of people were fooled by Covid and wore face diapers and got at least one shot.

@rickiecomeaux8287

8 ай бұрын

@@barbwellman6686Revelation 22: 13, "I am the Alpha and the Omega, the first and the last, the beginning and the end." The Spirit of Jesus lived before Mary and Mary is sleeping in the dust on the earth awaiting the resurrection. Jesus is Theotokos, he is the Spirit of God made into the flesh. Roman Mary is Isis, Ishtar, Semiramis, and Ashtaroth. She is the harlot of Babylon that rides the beast which is Rome and the abominations written on the beast are: Mother of God, Holy Father, Infallible man, and Vicar of Christ.

How do you say that that you are catholic but deny the pope but not roman catholic

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

It is not 'idolatry' to ask other saints to pray to God on our behalf. Whether in our body or released from it, saints can interceed to God for the conversion of those in mortal sin or for the remission of venial sins we see other people commit. I can pray to God on your behalf, and I can ask His saints in Heaven to intercede to Him for you. "13 I write this to you who believe in the name of the Son of God, that you may know that you have eternal life. 14 And this is the confidence which we have in him, that if we ask anything according to his will he hears us. 15 And if we know that he hears us in whatever we ask, we know that we have obtained the requests made of him. 16 If any one sees his brother committing what is not a mortal sin, he will ask, and God will give him life for those whose sin is not mortal. There is sin which is mortal; I do not say that one is to pray for that. 17 All wrongdoing is sin, but there is sin which is not mortal." 1 John 5

@Michelle-pc4wp

Жыл бұрын

Stop you are ranting like a demon possessed person. Smh I truly pray for you, truly.

@kate60

Жыл бұрын

You are so full of yourself.

@josephk4310

Жыл бұрын

God bless you Barb ☦️, I am an Orthodox Christian ☦️. Слава тебе Вожи ☦️ Амин.

@barbwellman6686

Жыл бұрын

@Archangel M Thank you & God Bless you and your family!

@mitchellosmer1293

10 ай бұрын

quote---It is not 'idolatry' to ask other saints to pray to God on our behalf. Whether in our body or released from it, saints can interceed to God for the conversion of those in mortal sin or for the remission of venial sins we see other people commit. --unquote THAT IS AN OPINION, which NO ONE care about!!! btw--what "saints" are you talking about??? -----quote---I can pray to God on your behalf, and I can ask His saints in Heaven to intercede to Him for you.--unquote You do that. The "saints" in heaven are God's created Beings!!! THey follow God--NOT YOU!!! ------

Consider also that both Calvin and Luther were Jew-haters, Luther probably the strongest. Rome also has always hated Jews. Calvin and Luther both held on to Roman Catholic heresies like infant baptism and that Mary died a virgin as the theotokas. Amillenialism is Roman Catholic doctrine and prevalent in Calvinism, which leads to anti-Jew/-Israel ideology.

My question and I will apologize first I do not mean to offend anyone BUT, “If you’re a Protestant do you know what “Protestant” means? Protestant means protesting. What are you protesting? The answer is “Protestants are protesting the Roman Catholic Church Doctrines.” There are many things the Catholic religion promotes so I can’t enumerate ALL of them, such as baptism of the dead, baptism of infants, infallibility of the Pope, the forgiveness of a Priest, I’m sure there is more but the question I have is this: If you’re protesting Catholic Doctrines that go against the Bible: WHY do you accept the “Catholic Sabbath” ? God says his Sabbath is the Seventh Day to honor “God’s Creation” and the Catholic changed it to Sunday to honor the Resurrection on the first day of the week. Sounds like human failed logic to me! Obey God’s 7th Day Sabbath or obey Roman Catholic logic and worship on the Roman Sun Day (worship of the Sun)? So should we worship the SUN or the SON?

@wingchun1963

5 ай бұрын

To correct you Catholics DONT Baptist the dead . That's a Mormon thing. You're also in error over the Sabbath. For Jews it's binding , to the early Christians, those who were Jewish and part of the way movement also observed the Sabbath , but they also held it was conditional for entrants into the way to be circumcized. As Christianity grew and more gentile converts adhered to the faith, the Jewish ness facet fell away such as temple sacrifices, they had been replaced by the Eucharist . Kosher foods were done away with. Jewish OT scriptures having been fulfilled were viewed differently Mary was seen as the new ark of the covenant And the Sabbath s days rest was set aside. Christians worshiped God through the Eucharist on the Lords Day, the new day of creation. SDAs get a lot of things wrong such as the teachings of ebwhite, a woman to teach others, and she came 1800 years after the fact, anachronistic to write criticizing comments from the Apostolic traditions of not let a woman teach or hold authority over a man. I just assumed all SDA were all beta men.

@Mic1904

4 ай бұрын

The key issue here is your foundational statement “Protestants are protesting the Roman Catholic Church Doctrines" and, thus, you start down a path in your comment of accepting that the point of 'Protestantism' is merely to exist to object to anything Catholics believe. Firstly, this isn't where the word 'Protestant' comes from (it's an obscure political term from medieval Germany about opposition from Lutherans to a particular piece of government legislation about freedom of religion - it does not mean 'protesting Catholic doctrine'). Second, being Protestant is not a matter of believing the opposite of whatever Catholics believe, otherwise not only would we not believe in Scripture, sin, baptism, and the Trinity, but frankly, we wouldn't believe in Christ and the Lord God to begin with. Completely nonsensical to take a position of 'If you're a Protestant, why do you happen to believe the same thing Catholics do?' We believe MANY things Catholics do. This isn't to say that your willingness to debate the day of the 'Sabbath' isn't a valid discussion to have - only that your starting foundation for your discussion here is a little faulty. God bless!

@Peter_McKenna587

3 ай бұрын

​@@Mic1904 💯

Sola Scriptura is a heresy

@barbwellman6686

Жыл бұрын

Not that relying on Sacred Scripture is heresy, but that the Apostles were establishing Sacred Tradition in the Church prior to Acts, the Apostolic Letters, and Revelation actually haven been written and sent to the Church. And, the Apostles were busy training and ordaining men to ministry.

@LightOfAllMankind

Жыл бұрын

Protestants have the audacity of customer service in a hardware store that think they know how to build a house

@johnlee8885

Жыл бұрын

Heresy to you

@LightOfAllMankind

Жыл бұрын

@@johnlee8885 relativism is post modern

@johnlee8885

Жыл бұрын

​@@LightOfAllMankind Did Jesus rebuke the Pharisees because the tradition of men instead of scripture sola scriptural. Isnt church tradition the tradition of men. Where is the doctrine of the eucharistic in the Bible or infant baptism or all the Catholic sacrements

Catholic Church is generational. I am the only born again in my family. They are full of pride based on works. They are dead in sin. After 33 years alive in Christ, I amazed to be chosen. Election is true. Christ Crucified for your sin is the only way to Salvation. Salvation is not a human decision. Salvation is a work of Grace. The Church of Rome is a false religion producing much evil behavior.

@endtimesareuponus8930

Жыл бұрын

Calvinism is Satanic like Catholicism.

@Bonaparte3922

Жыл бұрын

@@endtimesareuponus8930 You are indeed a sweet little angel. God bless you.

On Resurrection Sunday, Christ commissioned the Apostolic Church to Baptize using the Trinitarian formula: "Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you. And behold, I am with you always, to the end of the age." (Matthew 28:18-20). In Sacred Apostolic Tradition, St. Paul baptized Lydia, Cilvanus, and the jailers "entire household". St. Paul also confirmed the 12 men at Ephesus in Acts 12 .

@mitchellosmer1293

10 ай бұрын

Catholics claim Sunday is a holy day made by God. I will ask these questions again which NO ONE can answer. And I know you will NOT!!! Where in the Holy Bible does GOD say HE RESTED on the First day of Creation?--(to make the day special). Where in the Holy Bible does GOD say HE BLESSED the First day of the week ?--(to make the day special). Where in the Holy Bible does GOD say HE SANCTIFIED the First day of the week ?--(to make the day special). Where in the Holy Bible does GOD say HE NAMED the First day of the week ?--(to make the day special). Where in the Holy Bible does GOD say HE DECLARES the First day of the week as HIS HOLY DAY?--(to make the day special). FACTS: The ONLY DAY GOD RESTED on---7th day. The ONLY DAY GOD BLESSED---7th day. The ONLY DAY GOD SANCTIFIED---7th day. The ONLY DAY GOD named--7th day.-Sabbath -Isaiah 58:13 The ONLY DAY GOD DECLARES AS HIS HOLY DAY------7th day---Sabbath--Isaiah 58:13 .Quote the Holy Bible and prove me wrong!!! (When a law is once enacted by proper Authority, that law must remain in force until that same Authority repeals it; and the repeal must be as plainly stated as the original enactment." - anonymous)

How is it that when it comes to spit on and slander catholicism, the whole of the devilish shattered wonky protestant galaxy gather, under the guidance of the devil?

Catholic apologists can always sight various scriptures they think support their heresy.

Rome preaches a distorted 'gospel' that will not save those who follow it. Kudos for calling out the Papal cult!

Catholic saints of the counter Reformation include: Charles Borromeo, Philip Neri, John of the Cross, Teresa of Ávila, Francis de Sales, and Vincent de Paul.

Unfortunately, KZread flashes an advertisement for a "transgender" drug prior to allowing this video to be watched.

@andrelgospel3029

Жыл бұрын

The same thing happened to me earlier. It’s targeted harassment aimed at our biblical beliefs

@HearGodsWord

Жыл бұрын

The adverts are based on your browsing history i.e. your cookies.

@wanda520

Жыл бұрын

I see this constantly. It’s deliberate

Christ established One Holy Apostolic Church, He and the Father sent the Holy Spirit to her to guide her to all Truth, and He commissioned His Church to "tend and feed His sheep and lambs" in every generation with His Sacramental Grace.

@angelinasalo2863

Жыл бұрын

There are so many hungry catholics anywhere in the world an empty stomach but church did nothing.

@mitchellosmer1293

10 ай бұрын

quoet---Christ established One Holy Apostolic Church,--unquote THEH IT SHOULD BE NAMED in the Holy Bible!!! WHERE????? Biblical Proof the seventh day (Saturday) IS the Sabbath Matt 27:62 The next day, the one after Preparation Day....... Mat 28:1 In the end of the sabbath, as it began to dawn toward the first day of the week, c Mark 15:42 - It was Preparation Day (that is, the day before the Sabbath). Mark 16:1-2 - When the Sabbath was over, Mark 16:9 When Jesus rose early on the first day of the week Luke 23:54 It was Preparation Day, and the Sabbath was about to begin Luke 23:56 Then they went home and prepared spices and perfumes. But they rested on the Sabbath in obedience to the commandment. Luke 24:1 On the first day of the week, very early in the morning, .... John 19:31 Now since it was preparation day, in order that the bodies might not remain on the cross on the sabbath, for the sabbath day of that week was a solemn one, John 19:42 o because of the Jewish day of Preparation, since the tomb was close at hand, they laid Jesus there. 42 And so, because it was the day of preparation for the Jewish Passover John 20:1 The first day of the week cometh Mary Magdalene early, when it was yet dark, unto the sepulchre, btw---Matt --14:19----- Jesus "broke bread"--Communion?? No. they ate bread and fish.

@barbwellman6686

10 ай бұрын

@mitchellosmer1293 Christ died on Friday, judged and released captive Old Testament saints from Sheol throughout Saturday, and Resurrected on Sunday.

@mitchellosmer1293

10 ай бұрын

@@barbwellman6686 quote-- judged and released captive Old Testament saints from Sheol throughout Saturday,unquote Nope--Not according to the Bible!! Matt 27:52-53 52 and the graves were opened; and many bodies of the saints who had fallen asleep were raised; 53 and coming out of the graves after His resurrection, they went into the holy city and appeared to many. Graves were opened on Friday--- " coming out of the graves after His resurrection, they went into the holy city and appeared to many" AFTER the resurrection (Sunday) NO judgement!!! NOT "released captive "--as you say. Sheol--graves -

@barbwellman6686

10 ай бұрын

@mitchellosmer1293 Both the Old Testament saints and those who rejected God were judged. Luke 16: 22 “The time came when the beggar died and the angels carried him to Abraham’s side. The rich man also died and was buried. 23 In Hades, where he was in torment, he looked up and saw Abraham far away, with Lazarus by his side. 24 So he called to him, ‘Father Abraham, have pity on me and send Lazarus to dip the tip of his finger in water and cool my tongue, because I am in agony in this fire.’ 25 “But Abraham replied, ‘Son, remember that in your lifetime you received your good things, while Lazarus received bad things, but now he is comforted here and you are in agony. 》》》》 26 And besides all this, between us and you a great chasm has been set in place, so that those who want to go from here to you cannot, nor can anyone cross over from there to us.’《《《《《

What a joke , a Protestant explaining the Roman Catholic Church. Now that rich!

Fr. Luther (solely relying on his own judgement) questioned the necessity of the books of Hebrews, James, Jude, and Revelation. Christ specify told St.John to write all that he saw and heard in a book and give it to the Churches.

@michaelbrunsdon8938

11 ай бұрын

Yes the the "churches" were separated only by geography. They were still all one church....the same one church as today!

@barbwellman6686

11 ай бұрын

@@michaelbrunsdon8938 Yep

@mitchellosmer1293

10 ай бұрын

@@michaelbrunsdon8938 quote---Yes the the "churches" were separated only by geography. They were still all one church....the same one church as today!--unquote and what church is that??? Antioch, Pisidia: Acts 13:14; Gal 1:2--Antioch, Syria: Acts 11:26 (Paul's home base), Athens: Acts 17:34, Babylon: 1 Peter 5:13; Acts 2:9, Berea: Acts 17:11, Caesarea: Acts 10:1,48, Cenchrea: Rom 16:1, Colossae: Col 1:2, Corinth: Acts 18:1, Crete: Titus 1:5, Cyrene: Acts 11:20, Damascus: Acts 9:19, Derbe: Acts 14:20; Gal 1:2, Ephesus: Acts 18:19, Hierapolis Col 4:13, Iconium: Acts 14:1; Gal 1:2, Jerusalem: Acts 2:5, Joppa: Acts 9:36, 38, Laodicea: Rev 1:11, Col 4:15, Lydda: Acts 9:32 Lystra: Acts 14:6; Gal 1:2, Pergamum: Rev 1:11, Philadelphia: Rev 1:11 Philippi: Acts 16:12, Puteoli, Italy: Acts 28:13-14, Rome: Rom 1:7, Sardis: Rev 1:11, Sharon: Acts 9:35, Smyrna: Rev 1:11, Tarsus: Acts 9:30 Thessalonica: Acts 17:1, Thyatira: Rev 1:11; Acts 16:14, Troas: Acts 20:6-7 Regions of churches: Region of Phoencia: Acts 11:19 Region of Samaria: Acts 8:14, 25 Churches of Judea: Gal 1:22 Churches of Galatia: Gal 1:2 Churches of Asia: 1 Cor 16:19 Churches of Macedonia: 2 Cor 8:1 AND NOT ONE named CATHOLIC!!! ---What churches were mentioned in the Bible? The Seven Churches of Asia as stated in the Book of Revelation are Ephesus, Smyrna, Pergamum, Thyatira, Sardis, Philadelphia, and Laodicea. Today, all these are existing names in Turkey as they are ancient cities protected by the Culture and Tourism Ministry of the Republic of Turkey. ---AND: In the early stages of Christianity, believers are shown to have met in the Temple or Jewish synagogues, as well as houses (see: Acts 2:46, Acts 5:42, Acts 9:1-2). However, as persecution against Christians increased, they were forced out of the Temple and synagogues, and moved almost exclusively to meeting in “houses.” Today, in certain parts of the world (i.e. China, Iran), believers still meet in secret in houses for this reason. ----- When we look at “churches” in the New Testament, we see “churches”associated with a city or region in the plural: i.e. “the churches of Galatia” (1 Cor 16:1), “the churches of Asia” (1 Cor 16:19), “the churches of Macedonia” (2 Cor 8:1), and in the singular: i.e. “the church which was at Jerusalem” (Acts 8:1)(Acts 11:22), “the church which was at Antioch” (Acts 13:1), “the church of God which is at Corinth (1 Cor 1:2)(2 Cor 1:1). --Churches named in the Bible ----Church of God. Acts 20:28 , Body of Christ.--Ephesians 1:22-23, -----Bride of Christ Revelation 21:9 , -------Church of the Living God.-1 Timothy 3:15 , -----City of the Living God. Hebrews 12:22, ----Flock of God.Ezekiel 34:15 ----Fold of Christ.John 10:16, ----Habitation of God. Ephesians 2:22 -----Heavenly of Jerusalem.Galatians 4:26, ----House of God. 1 Timothy 3:15 , ----House of the God of Jacob. Isaiah 2:3 , ----House of Christ. Hebrews 3:6 , ----Household of God. Ephesians 2:19 , ----Israel of God. Galatians 6:16,----Mount Zion.Psalm 2:6 , Hebrews 12:22, -----New Jerusalem.Revelation 21:2, ----Sanctuary of God.Psalm 114:2, ----Spouse of Christ.,Song of Solomon 4:12 ,----Temple of God.1 Corinthians 3:16-17 ----Temple of the Living God. 2 Corinthians 6:16 ----What is absent is the name Catholic!!! NOT ONE church ever named"Catholic from 3AD--to--100D!!!!!! *****

@ShirleyAnnPetrillo-oj7sc

8 ай бұрын

Recent research reveals that WITHIN “the one unified church”there are many differing beliefs, even non-belief. In USA about 1/3 of RCs do not believe that the eucharist is anything more than symbolic.

@barbwellman6686

8 ай бұрын

@@ShirleyAnnPetrillo-oj7sc The unity of both the Catholic and Orthodox Churches was never determined by a single generation of the laity. The unity of the Church is protected by Sacred Scripture, Sacred Apostolic Tradition, and the doctrine and dogmas of the Magisterium.

This is false. Why are you not Lutherans anyway?

Those who ignore Mary, ignore Jesus. She took me to Jesus. So please, stop telling bs.

​ Scripture is not produced by men but through men through the Holy Spirit. Scripture is inspired and good for preaching exhortation and teaching and salvation. There is no difference from me from Peter or Paul except they are sinner's just like me and they saw the Lord themselves. So where is the doctrine of purgatory in scripture. Isnt that why Luther had his letter nail to the church because of indulgences to get their relatives out of purgatory. I bet you don't know the difference between the Kingdom oh Heaven vs the Kingdom of God because you don't read scripture. Next you'll say a ad hominium that I delude to compare my self to Peter or Paul what did Jesus say God can make rocks to become the son of Abraham. Your catholic salvation is anathema. It is just mystery Babylon pagan worship that has the same idols dressed up in Christian tradition. You Catholics changes the ten commandments and take out the second commandment against idols and split up the ten commandment into two to make ten. Look up in any catholic bible the second commandment is missing. All the reformers believe like me papacy is antichrist. Pope says he is God on earth. He can forgive sin. He is infallible. He holds the keys to Heaven and Hell. Antichrist is instead of Christ. VICARIUS FILI DEI The title of the pope on his crown adds up to 666. Mary was a sinner she sacrificed two turtle doves as a sin offering. James was the brother of Jesus born of Mary. Mary worship is the same female deity worship as heathens the divine feminine. Same as ISIS, Diana. IHS on papal garments mean ISIS Horus Seth which is Egyptian worship for Father mother son. You are not saved and damned to hell because you worship a different Christ and lost. The Pope and Roman Catholic Church is guilty of murdering more Bible believing Christian and Jews than any communist nation. The Roman Catholic Church is the Harlots if Revelation dressed in scarlet and purple with a cup full of abomination because it is Babylonian pagan worship. It changed times and laws. Changed the sabbath day and the ten commandments. Come out of her. The Roman Catholic Church was created by the cyptojews or Jews that said were Christian but not. If you look at the sacraments of Judaism it is exactly the same as the Roman Catholic Church. They both have religious hierarchy the jews have Pharisees and saducees the RCC have cardinals and Bishops. Both keep the sheep from salvation and don't enter themselves. Both have high priests ie Pope. Come out of her read the Bible believe on Jesus only for your salvation no sacraments, saints, idol, eucharistic, priest nothing else and be saved. Isnt the robber next to Christ in paradise. Did he need the sacraments or baptism to be saved. He just believe in Jesus. The miter on the popes head is a fish mouth like the Babylonian fish God Dagon. Sorry dude you been duped and have been worshiping the devil your whole life. The son of perdition was used in the Bible twice. Once for Judas and once for antichrist. So Judas was of the twelve he was amongst the believers the pope was dressed in Christian clothes but is the son of perdition. Isnt the devil so ingenious that the antichrist would be someone who said he is a Christian but his master is the Devil himself. Only two people said they are God on earth. One Jesus and One the papacy.

You guys don’t really care about the truth. If you did you would actually seek to address the Catholic claims seriously and honestly, but you don’t. All you do is misrepresent and strawman their beliefs. Bearing false witness is a serious sin.