They showed a Brahmos missile without a warhead strike a ship 3 times, didn't even mention it.

Жыл бұрын

And?

@wenomeyouindesama6027

Жыл бұрын

@ that all

@gascan

Жыл бұрын

They need stock footage showing action to keep viewers interested in an otherwise mediocre video. I saw plenty of ships that were not Moskva getting hit by missiles that were not Neptune.

@Nunyabizn3ss

Жыл бұрын

@@gascan that’s because the Moskva wasn’t hit by a Neptune! The Black Sea Fleet needed a flag-submarine, so they used the Moskva to capture Ukraine’s valuable missile in a special submarine conversation operation.

@jeffk6548

Жыл бұрын

@@Nunyabizn3ss took my a moment to realize what you meant, made me laugh

most existing antiship missiles are decades old, and the US has opted for the slower sea skimming approach over hypersonic and supersonic higher altitude missiles for many decades now.

@watcher5729

11 ай бұрын

Stealthier probably.

@spark300c

Ай бұрын

stealth is the reason. there is limit to fast it can go and still be effective. the faster you go the bigger inferred signature. It also triggers A.I immediately because AI know its anti ship missile. If missile is traveling sub sonic speed and sea skimming it take awhile to realize it missile come to take you out. At first you think it just air craft going some where or a boat if low enough and slow enough. Or you do not see it all when it far out. once in range for you realize its a missile. It speed up and goes for the kill. then you do not have enough time to react. the best way to discover a cruise missile is through Air plane scouts which can see it form above.

@SoloRenegade

Ай бұрын

@@spark300c you watch too many movies.

@spark300c

Ай бұрын

@@SoloRenegade no I just over thought it. now being stealthy making a missile look like private air plane in crowded air space on radar. stealth is not being seen or mistake as something else.

@SoloRenegade

Ай бұрын

@@spark300c being mistaken as something else is not stealth. that's ECM.

I thought you gonna explain how the "Anti-ship Cruise Missiles" works from day to day (from the engineering perspectives of course), but this is just a salesman presentation or high school student presentation you better learn more about physics first dude before you use that "Engineering" titles

@grandcrowdadforde6127

Жыл бұрын

F F >> next! anti-missle cruise ships !

Wow! I enjoy seeing your updated information. Thank you very much and keep it up. Very informative and very exciting to see. Congrats.

Brahmos supersonic cruise missiles not mentioned!

My favourite series on this channel

The lasted Russia technology in from 1970 . The ship looks great there’s nothing in the heart ❤️.

@nicholasmupchurch604

Жыл бұрын

You’re not making any sense

@MrBlackbutang

Жыл бұрын

@@nicholasmupchurch604 Nophoekingway

@MrBlackbutang

Жыл бұрын

@@nicholasmupchurch604 mutta Russia

@Jose-og909

Жыл бұрын

says some idiot on youtube!

@andrerothweiler9191

Жыл бұрын

To Bad you Attack a country that Made them, so they know the Ship in and out

Brahmos most feared antiship missile

@anthrazite

Жыл бұрын

No one fears that thing, I know it makes Indians feel cool about themselves but it has never been combat tested.

@prashanth.lgowdas394

Жыл бұрын

@@anthrazite brahmos also known hasis a widow maker by USA

@anthrazite

Жыл бұрын

@@prashanth.lgowdas394 Who told you that? It hasn't made any widows yet since it hasn't been tested in combat.

This really proves something, that most "might" is really just hype and ingenuity will always win.

I gotta say i never thought I'd be curious about this flying kamikaze salmons

jist like no one believe planes from carrier can sink battleships.

Ballistic missiles are not sea skimming. They attack from the top

Russian warship Moskva didn’t have its Radar’s on. So the ship simply didn’t know it had been locked onto and fired at with Anti-Ship missiles. Thus the AK-630 systems never even slewed its turrets to fire.

Not just anti ship but anti land targets too.

Argentina almost destroys Royal Navy in 1982 with old bombs and only 5 French Exocet missiles

And we haven’t even talked about hypersonic missiles or the Russian nuclear done torpedo yet 😅

@hatecrewsix2

Жыл бұрын

Because those guys are NATO fans.

@maxklinger1494

Жыл бұрын

The Poseidon/Status-6 has a very limited usefulness as an anti ship platform. It's much more a second strike strategic nuclear weapon.

@billcook7483

Жыл бұрын

There's no need to, if it's Russian won't work properly, nothing to worry about.

decoy launching to overwhelm would help.the again the high end detection means from eyes in the sky etc would detect before launch

@Coinz8

11 ай бұрын

Not really. A lot of systems like the Aegis combat system and the british (forget the name of what they use) are designed specifically for missile saturation attacks.

@watcher5729

11 ай бұрын

@@Coinz8 lower cost decoys vs higher end missiles isnt the best yet.we see in the wars hapoening.

@spark300c

Ай бұрын

yes. But at its speed it never should have gotten through. It failure of artifactual intelligence of CIW. With good Artifactual intelligence the CIW reacts at lightning speed and stop missile before it make a hit. with many ciw ensures the missile will not get though a could of machine gun/ missile fire. It why Russians want hypersonic missiles hope it get through before it get enough to bullets to be taken out.

The Royal Navy lost 2 ships and a 3rd put out of action for to ASMs in the Falklands. The lesson learn was Radar Is Life. This was proven correct during the Gulf War when a Royal Navy shot down a Silkworm missile with a Sea Dart missile, a task that failed during the Falklands. Made possible by upgraded radar to guarantee the Sea Dart, a 1960s ramjet powered SAM designed for high flying bombers, remained on target.

@Interesting Engineering the weather played a significant role in the ships sinking and would have been nice to mention how the moskvas air defences work and how the weather or bad crew training played a significant role in the ships sinking.

@sidewinder3422

Жыл бұрын

As with many cases with Russia, their equipment aren't actually so bad, its the training and organizational structure that fcks them up.

@paddington1670

Жыл бұрын

@@sidewinder3422 They had/have the same radar scopes as we used in 1980, to say they are poorly equipped is an understatement, AND their training is terrible because theyre all on short term contracts therefore none of them give a flying... And they have designated damage control parties that take forever to get to work, while every other navy each sailor is a damage control party first, sailor second. Seen officers on deck putting out fires.

@ThatDruidDude

Жыл бұрын

Can you please share how it happened based on what you know ?

@anthrazite

Жыл бұрын

Satellite imaging showed calm weather all over the black sea before and during Moskva's sinking, their "it sunk in stormy weather" is complete bs

@antipropo461

Жыл бұрын

@@paddington1670 Yeah it's just a huge indecipherable puzzle that the crappy Russian military is crushing the best proxy army NATO ever had.

Anti ship missiles go back all the way to 1943, where the 3rd reich deployed the Hs293 , which was rocket powered for the first 10 seconds of its flight before gliding into its target. It claims at least 15 ships sunk or so heavily dammaged, they were scuttled.

The Houthis just shot one of these at the USS Laboon today. An aircraft took out the missile!

Would not want to be aboard a ship during times of war between the US and China.

India's Bhramos is the best anti-ship missile in the world.

That's what happens when you have the Sam's and CIWS in stand by mode. The same happened to a US ship when a iraki fighter launch 2 exocets, they had the ciws in stand by and the Sam's

@yizeverienametaken

Жыл бұрын

US and Iraki were allies at the time

@ser43_OLDC

Жыл бұрын

@@yizeverienametaken so aliades that one fired two ASM to the ship of the other one

@yizeverienametaken

Жыл бұрын

@@ser43_OLDC If only there were some terminology for describing firing on friendlies.

@ser43_OLDC

Жыл бұрын

@@yizeverienametaken the only time in wich Irak and us were aliades was after 2015 and the relation isn't the best afterall

@yizeverienametaken

Жыл бұрын

@@ser43_OLDC Are you saying the US didn't support Iraq in the Iran-Iraq war?

Lol 33 seconds in, and this guy literally said "anti-defense missiles"

Those Chinese anti ship missiles seem scary af.

@Coinz8

11 ай бұрын

Maybe to a small nation navy.

0:38 the best in 80's?

@poes1314

Жыл бұрын

I love the smell of copium in the morning

Moskova was not hit by 2 Neptune missile maybe they either more than 2 missiles or maybe only 2 missiles able to hit Moskova rest of the missiles were shot down by Air Defence System

@Coinz8

11 ай бұрын

It was hit by two missiles because only TWO missiles were fired.

big ships like a aircraft carrier are sitting ducks for enemy

@wenomeyouindesama6027

Жыл бұрын

I dont think an aircraft carrier would supposed to rush straight into enemy line and totally destroyed by it speed and size

@rjgonzalez9220

Жыл бұрын

That's what aegis systems are for.

@Coinz8

11 ай бұрын

No it is not. U.S aircraft also have air defense capabilities such as RIM-162 ESSM and RIM-116 missiles. This whole notion of aircraft carriers navigating the oceans undefended is a bunch of BS and goes to show OP knows absolutely nothing about aircraft carriers and battle groups.

never mind them Arlee Burkes! theys peanuts mere pocket change! we wanna nail a Super Carrier like the Ford or Reagan... some where around $$ 12 or 13 BILLIONs with crews of 5 500 ! to say nuffin about negating their awesome offensive capability... can you illustrate how thats done?

5:09 5 meter????? More like flying Torpedo

You should know... Exocet means anything to you?

@ngamashaka4894

Жыл бұрын

New weak, they will talk about the amazing discovery of sonar or maybe gun powder.

Bro showed a clip of a patriot interceptor launch and called it a Neptune cruise missile

Seems the russian crew was asleep at the wheel

You showed Patriot and THAAD launching (land based air defense systems) while you were talking about platforms which could launch cruise missiles. The footage is generally misleading.

@FiFiiUwUu

Жыл бұрын

🤓

@robman2095

Жыл бұрын

Welcome to youtube where any correspondence between the audio and video is purely coincidental 😂

wowwww

Brahmos is the best.

Well "F" being on any ship.

A new anti ship missile a day keeps the american at bay 🤣🤣

Loitering hypersonic anti ship missile made all surface warship obsolete.

@spark300c

Ай бұрын

then advance AI ciws going to give surface warships a fighting chance.

@itch4travel

Ай бұрын

@@spark300c "Chinese #DF17 powered DF-ZF Hypersonic Glide Vehicle is a headache for US !" PTP... CTTO... kzread.info/dash/bejne/eIBpl5uqcsbSm8o.html

That's not actually footage of moszkva being hit, is it? Can't be.

@TONI-pc9yu

Жыл бұрын

Well ofc its not actually footage

These weapons are what war should be ,trying to out build your adversary,out tech em, nuclear weapons take all the fun and sport outta war.conventional weapons are plenty destructive, without poisoning innocent ppl with fallout.

@prestonl.2432

Жыл бұрын

Many more people would be dead right now if not for MAD.

@Coinz8

11 ай бұрын

war isnt "fun" nor is it a fucking "sport".

Moskva may look formidable in the eye of the world's Navy, but when faced with gallant Ukrainian soldiers armed with Neptune Missile, Black Sea suddenly become the perfect graveyard for the ship and its crew. 🥰🤗🥰

@jorgesalinas8506

Жыл бұрын

That ship was old as fuck. Hardly formidable

@jayjolupoi88891

Жыл бұрын

stop your propaganda mate, no ones buying

@maxklinger1494

Жыл бұрын

@@jorgesalinas8506 Neptune isn't on the cutting edge of AShM technology either tho. At least in theory it should have been able to counter such a threat with her short range air defences (Osa and AK-630 CISW).

Ukraine used the new variant of the missiles it is a homing Missiles and a low flying missile

Sure , its the go to weapon of choose and only answer for those that like to talk up game changers , and yet fail to see that while each country has developed them , fail to see countries that have built the real answer to them , integrated sensor technology which allows example a carrier strike group to operate under a bubble of sensors and shooters from way over the horizon , seeing beyond their own ships sensors , and engaging targets at maximum range and that includes integrating the likes of the new USAF Raider bomber designed to sit right on the edge of the battle space to deliver long rang munitions ! as for those so called long ranged ship killers, one needs to read up on the technology required to first detect a moving ship at long distance in a vast open space of water, and then engage and finally hit that moving target with major course corrections ??

@prestonl.2432

Жыл бұрын

SM2 ans CIWS are designed for that

A ship is only as good as its crew.

@rogerout8875

Жыл бұрын

The crew of a ship has nothing to do with the weapons being used against it n

@boejiden7093

Жыл бұрын

@@rogerout8875 so clearly you have no idea what you’re talking about. An undertrained crew that doesn’t know when to activate it’s self defense systems is a crew failing. Sure the ship’s systems are indeed a bit dated for modern standards but the ship never even fought back. That’s on the poorly trained crew. Not the ship.

@rogerout8875

Жыл бұрын

@@boejiden7093 what good is the best crew in the world if they're not equipped to see an anti-ship missile coming right at them?

@boejiden7093

Жыл бұрын

@@rogerout8875 they were equipped. They were shit trained thats why they didnt even think of looking at their radars

@rogerout8875

Жыл бұрын

@@boejiden7093 Sources?

this goes to show how bad there AI was for the ciw systems. It was sub sonic missile. With good AI, ciw system would have no problem stoping it. The phoenix ciw is effective at stop sub sonic missiles. if good enough software and serval of them then killing one missile is at 100 percent. If one misses then other going it hit. this is why its important cows systems are integrated to ships systems. one is like 70 percent effective. Then two working together is like 140% effective.

Did he even actually explain why the Russians decoys didn’t work and why the ship actually sunk?

Thay have been around for 40 years.

Does anyone know of any sources and or videos that show the real events that led to the sinking of the Moskwa? There's like a thousand different stories.

Wonder wich ship will get the name Moscow?

Chinese actually named their missile "Dong"🤣

@JeanLucCaptain

Жыл бұрын

FOR MAXIMUM EMOTIONAL DAMAGE to Woke American soldier rename our Big ASM the DONG.

Nothing would hurt the russians more than sinking ships. do it ukraine !!!!!

Even the best defenses only work when they are turned on. The US navy learned that when the uss stark was hit by an exocet missile because they didnt activate their defenses.

@yizeverienametaken

Жыл бұрын

That's true but there are a few details that I believe are very important. The ship didn't sink and the jet that attacked belonged to an ally. The US wasn't even at war at the time.

Why you didn't mention brahmos missile 🇮🇳🇮🇳

Falkland Islands...

Все буде Украïна 🇺🇦🇰🇿

I wonder if Taiwan has any and if so, how many.

@Bigchugus12347

Жыл бұрын

They do

Yemen ❤

Those missile launchers and their operators were operating from a civilian port, making all civilian ports potential targets for Russian artillery. Speaking of targets, where is ukraines navy?

@drewh3224

Жыл бұрын

Don't be fool! All came from the US, as well as intelligence.

@NukeTelAviv

Жыл бұрын

@@drewh3224 Inshallah, Dong Feng missiles will soon be making all American aircraft carriers into corral reefs.

@strentole6464

Жыл бұрын

Russians don't need a reason. Russians attacked Ukraine on February 24, 2022, without reason and without provocation. The Russians are simply shooting at civilians throughout Ukraine. Are there missiles, are there no missiles, Russians don't care. They just shoot.

@orionyt9323

Жыл бұрын

Ukranians sank all their ships in port when the offensive started.

@NukeTelAviv

Жыл бұрын

@@strentole6464 lol okay troll

No c wis!

Get Ukraine a few thousand tomahawks 1500 miles range put ship seekers on em.

it wasnt actually not Neptune the one which sunk moskova it was Swedish anti ship missile and it was usa awacs that might gave the cordination source " crux news"

Moskva is not the best ship air defence in Russian navy , not by any chance..... It's a cold war relic with old air defence missiles

there is no such thing as best ship if the crew are irresponsible. they are probably drunk because they think no one can sink them because ukraine ships are gone

This is not true! Russians fired thousands of projectiles at me in few seconds from a battleship, all disappeared. But in other situation the weapon can take out any missiles with only few bullets. Fighters can’t do this, the plane would flip over.

By supplying Ukraine with missiles is as good as being involved in the conflict.

I am so glad that everyone can now see that Russian army is not even close to be on the same Level as NATO. The only reason why Russians are still present to this day is because they have nuclear weapon. Otherwise, a fee EU countries joined could take care of them, not to mention the US.

@hatecrewsix2

Жыл бұрын

Stupid approach. Read more mate

What if this ship sinking is a plot of russia

Very dramatic. LOL

I’m going to McDonald’s does anybody want anything

Did you even talk about the topic? There a lot of different missiles, nice. You didn't really talk about anything with substance at all. How could they sink the moskva? Why couldn't the Russians defend themselves? You ask questions but don't really answer anything. Feels like a clickbait video. P. S. : can you tell us again that there are missiles flying 5m above the sea? You repeated the same information one time in metric one time in ft as if it was something completely different...

Doesn’t Russia have CIWS?

@chanakya5480

Жыл бұрын

AK 630 easily take out this missile. 🤔

@dianapennepacker6854

Жыл бұрын

Something similar yeah like the Kashtan and AK-630. I wonder what happened that day and why the defenses failed. Or how many missiles were launched.

@dianapennepacker6854

Жыл бұрын

@@chanakya5480 Apparently not...

@woofy031

Жыл бұрын

@@dianapennepacker6854 indeed, this makes me question did the ciws even shoot or functional? If so how many missiles were actually shot down? I searched and found nothing that stated moskva ciws during the sinking..

@ser43_OLDC

Жыл бұрын

Yes but when you have all the air defense systems in stand by that things happens.

ไต้หวันก็ยังมีตาตรวจการทางอากาศสามารถยิงโต้ตอบการรุกรานของจีนได้อย่างต่อเนื่องโดยที่จีนไม่สามารถทำอะไรได้แม้จะระดมพรมเป้าหมายต่างๆ

Significant number of Soviet scientists and most aerospace facilities are in Ukraine.

@JeanLucCaptain

Жыл бұрын

so then explain Russia having its own very nice air-force and Ukraine having to beg for F-16s?

@mercedescl

Жыл бұрын

@@JeanLucCaptain very nice Air Force? You mean the one that fails to control the sky despite 10: 1 ratio? You mean the one that continues to refurbish Soviet leftovers to pretend to be new technologies? Ukraine was the home of Soviet space programs, missile programs, multiple tank production lines, multiple fighter production lines, majority agriculture production and almost all facilities to build large ocean going military & civilian ships. When the Soviet collapsed, Russia was left with a single tank production line, two single missile production facilities, and two fighter production lines.

this was done by america not ukraine

Шо по русні?

Moskva is old ship,on cold war technology!!!Rassia have new ships, and they ships don't came in war zone!!! Russian ship is in Caspian sea and have Cirkon rocket and nobody else destroyed this ships!!!

Russian sink it on purpose for their cause no way such an advanced warship gets sunk

@rogerout8875

Жыл бұрын

😂 who told you it was "advanced"?

that is NATO weapons not Ukraine

AS I SAY, RUSSIA VS RUSSIA ITSELF, SOVIET UNION VS SOVIET UNION ITSELF

The Slava class cruiser was over 40 years old. The crew was rescued. The Kirov class is the best defended Russian ship. It has Zircon hypersonic anti-ship missiles.

@rogerout8875

Жыл бұрын

Sources on the crew? That sounds made up to me.

@Brandon-vu3kn

Жыл бұрын

@@rogerout8875 Source: Russia said so

@anthrazite

Жыл бұрын

It was laid down 40 years ago but costly modernized multiple times since then. Kirov is kinda useless where it is, it couldn't safely operate anywhere in a war szenario.

@ViceCoin

Жыл бұрын

@@anthrazite I agree. Big, slow ships, especially carriers, are obsolete in a modern conflict. I would build a navy around subs (armed with SAMs), hovercraft, ground effect vehicles, unmanned vehicles, supersonic combat seaplanes (aka Convair Delta Dart), and drones.

@Coinz8

11 ай бұрын

@@ViceCoin They are not obsolete. If they were then china and russia wouldnt be trying to build them. Your subs with sams (which is a dumb idea by the way) would be detected by an orion anti sub plane launched from a carrier to locate and destroy it. Hovercrafts are ESPECIALLY vulnerable to missile fire and aircraft (again, launched from a carrier) nothing you said here is effective.

Don't be fool! All came from the US, as well as intelligence.

@killian4934

Жыл бұрын

Nope neptunes are ukrainians missiles. The us isnt the only country in the world with a fonctionning army.

@NukeTelAviv

Жыл бұрын

@@killian4934 Harpoons were used, not Neptunes. And it's *Functioning

@strentole6464

Жыл бұрын

@@NukeTelAviv On April 14, 2022, when the cruiser Moskva was destroyed, Harpoon missiles had not yet been delivered to Ukraine. Deliveries of Harpoon missiles began in May. The cruiser Moskva was destroyed by Ukrainian-made Neptune missiles.

@NukeTelAviv

Жыл бұрын

@@strentole6464 source?

@killian4934

Жыл бұрын

@@NukeTelAviv Nope even us sources say its Neptune. English insnt my langage, no need to correct every mistake i make.

Лучшая защита у Крейсера Москва????))) Которому несколько десятков лет??? У вас всё в порядке с головой? Тут стоит старинный комплекс аналог с300 который не расчитан на перехват крылатых ракет. Сам корабль выполнен не по стелс технологии. Одним словом чушь не несите!!!!!😄🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😆😆😆😆😆😆

6 minutes of nothing...

Best anti ship missile is Zircon.Your country is incapable of making such hypersonic cruise missiles.Glory to Russian scientist.

This video is full of misinformation 🙄🙄

Oh, no, another of these click-bait channels with their not even wrong-narration. Yes, the Moskva sank. Was it directly and immediately due to ASM strikes? No. Poor damage control and stereo-typical Russian incompetence doomed the ship, along with poor weather.

@space_guy_04

Жыл бұрын

The issue is not the sinking, the issue is how the two missiles able to hit the ship without being intercepted.

Well a lot of bs in that video

5:04 stop repeating these unproven claims. thats how people grossly overestimate russia and china's capabilities

🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤥🤥🤥🤥🤥🤥🤥🤥🤥

The first 1 minute was just about licking Ukraine's boots. Any person with above average knowledge about these military topics could've noticed that the first minute was full of unconfirmed and unknown "information" disguised as facts. Please stop no matter which side you're on

@JeanLucCaptain

Жыл бұрын

the only thing that is really known is that US Intel enabled the strike in the first place and it was never repeated. meanwhile Ukraine has no navy at all.

@Coinz8

11 ай бұрын

Yet, the moskva shits at the bottom of the black sea.

@Coinz8

11 ай бұрын

@@JeanLucCaptain And the russians BARELY have a navy

Great NEPTUNE missile that sinks powerless low tech warship. 👎👎👎👎👎

@poes1314

Жыл бұрын

Clearly you know nothing about warships 🤣

@rogerout8875

Жыл бұрын

But that's all Russia has??

Lol, What a Joke , Russia's strongest defense ship destroyed by two minor missiles.... Definitely arm selling game is going on.

@abhayprasad5319

Жыл бұрын

Nah number of missile launched which can't hold by ship defense system