The Future of Capitalism: Neo Feudalism? Panel 4: Radhika Desai and Michael Hudson

An interdisciplinary conference at the University of Chicago
4. Political Economy Panel (3:30-4:50 PM)
Radhika Desai (Manitoba): “What’s in a Name? The Misuses of ‘Feudalism’ and ‘Capitalism’”
Michael Hudson (UMKC): “Is the West Regressing into Neofeudalism?”
neofeudalismconference.wordpr...

Пікірлер: 23

  • @martduenas
    @martduenas20 күн бұрын

    My favorite geopolitical economic nerds!

  • @mns8732
    @mns873213 күн бұрын

    Why couldn't high-school be this interesting?

  • @piccalillipit9211
    @piccalillipit921120 күн бұрын

    *BOTH PEOPLE WERE FASCINATING* utterly brilliant.

  • @Crytoma
    @Crytoma22 күн бұрын

    Insightful

  • @thecirculareconomy4412
    @thecirculareconomy441220 күн бұрын

    Sadly so many progressive events are marred by technical issues. Often wondered why this is. Great content however

  • @jason8434
    @jason843424 күн бұрын

    Prof. Desai makes an important point that Marx saw capitalism as progressive because, however crudely, it was socializing labor i.e. building a world of collective production and labor empowerment as opposed to feudal production for individual subsistence and aristocratic aggrandizement. This is the sense in which to understand "socialism" at its historical origins. Socialism is a project based on the socialization of labor and collective ownership based on political recognition of this ideology of industrial labor. I would argue from this premise that socialism's historical failure was a failure of industrial ideology, but that doesn't mean the socialization of labor cannot take new non-industrial forms, even semi-market forms based on reforms in how property rights function, opening up private property to public claims without having to abolish private property rights altogether.

  • @ChrisCleg

    @ChrisCleg

    23 күн бұрын

    I agree!! Great comment.

  • @piccalillipit9211

    @piccalillipit9211

    20 күн бұрын

    "socialism's historical failure was a failure of..." socialisms historical failure was due almost entirely to its pathological destruction by capitalism

  • @NotAPacifist825

    @NotAPacifist825

    13 күн бұрын

    "Socialism's historical failure". I guess I missed that bit.

  • @jason8434

    @jason8434

    13 күн бұрын

    @@NotAPacifist825 1989, look it up.

  • @NotAPacifist825

    @NotAPacifist825

    13 күн бұрын

    @@jason8434 yea no. No such thing.

  • @presterjohn1697
    @presterjohn169718 күн бұрын

    Does Radhika Desai offer any analysis of China's growing billionaire class? Growing class divide? If not why?

  • @ggc7318

    @ggc7318

    6 күн бұрын

    She would be canceled by CCP. Does she work for free ?

  • @tylermcconnell

    @tylermcconnell

    2 күн бұрын

    China does not worry about how many billionaires it has, as long as they do not challenge the communist party for State power. See Jack Ma.

  • @jacksonstone246
    @jacksonstone2466 күн бұрын

    “Today is already the tomorrow which the bad economist yesterday urged us to ignore” -Henry Hazlitt. This lady is out of her mind and emotional. What is her interest? the greater universe? No. Is it for the community? Doubt it. Is it for herself? Maybe. Is it from envy, hatred, and irrationality? Yes.

  • @ludviglidstrom6924
    @ludviglidstrom692420 күн бұрын

    Very interesting

  • @proadlekopy
    @proadlekopy24 күн бұрын

    The amount of books she must have read

  • @DannyDanny-rn7ck
    @DannyDanny-rn7ck20 күн бұрын

    26:00 Wierguild

  • @findbridge1790
    @findbridge179022 күн бұрын

    undying love for the sound of her own voice

  • @ludviglidstrom6924

    @ludviglidstrom6924

    20 күн бұрын

    Misogynist

  • @NotAPacifist825

    @NotAPacifist825

    13 күн бұрын

    She said only what was required to explain her point of view. So the opposite of what you said.

  • @jacksonstone246

    @jacksonstone246

    6 күн бұрын

    @@NotAPacifist825her point is non-point or a better word, non-sense. This economy isn’t capitalist in the first place. Capitalism is NO GOVERMENT FAVORTISM OR ACTIVISM. She is about to break down and either start crying or yelling or both. She is literally out of her mind. Her point it’s, philosophical, ethical, epistemological, it’s not even political. It’s sheer hatred and ignorance.