The Forgotten Largest Floatplane of All Time - CANT Z.511

Фильм және анимация

With a streamlined, smooth aesthetic, classic Italian lines and excellent performance - it's hard to understand why the CANT Z.511, which already holds such the accolade to its name of being the largest floatplane of all time - has been largely forgotten. Today we take a dive into its history, and the reason why its name is scarcely mentioned in aviation circles today.
Consider supporting us on Patreon: / aviationdeepdive
Join our Discord community: / discord
Sources:
Civoli M., Aereoplani: Regia Aeronautica-Aeronautica Militare 1923-2003 (2002)
Thompson, Jonathan (1963). Italian Civil & Military Aircraft 1930-1945. New York: Aero Publishers Inc.
John & Elke Weale, Combat Aircraft of World War Two, Arms and Armour Press, London, 1978.
0:00 - 1:51 Introduction
1:52 - 4:36 Construction
4:37 - 11:42 Flight Testing and Career
11:43 - 13:13 Conclusion

Пікірлер: 299

  • @aviationdeepdive
    @aviationdeepdive10 ай бұрын

    Sorry for the microphone quality on this one, am on holiday and forgot my high quality one! Feel free to join our Discord community! - discord.gg/WCevgcufwJ Consider supporting us on Patreon: www.patreon.com/AviationDeepDive

  • @aviationdeepdive

    @aviationdeepdive

    10 ай бұрын

    @dinoconc With Keynote, I know it's not really designed for that but it's the best I have

  • @mad_maxj65

    @mad_maxj65

    9 ай бұрын

    I actually am italian, and i am lucky to have been a rower in to Monfalcone's port, exactly were the videos are taken from . I always knew about the story of these beasts : in the lagoon outside of the Port there are multiple structures today called "caregoni" because of their resemblance to big chairs, old peaple often tell us that that they were test moorings for these seaplanes. Another interesting thing Is that in my rowing club there Is a giant catamaran called "corsara" that Is propelled by 12 rowers , It was built in 1947 out of some scrapped seaplanes pontoons. I always wondered out of wich seaplane those pontoons came. Also, amazing video.

  • @stratcat3216

    @stratcat3216

    7 ай бұрын

    FWIW we in American, when speaking of large aircraft, measure fuel in pounds, not gallons.

  • @giuliozappata1280
    @giuliozappata12809 ай бұрын

    Filippo Zappata, the engineer, is my ancestor! I have a lot of original drawings at home made by him!

  • @aviationdeepdive

    @aviationdeepdive

    9 ай бұрын

    Oh wow, that's incredible! Anything you'd like to share, I'd be really interested to see them at aviationdeepdive@gmail.com Alternatively, we'd love to have you on our server! discord.gg/WCevgcufwJ

  • @sengalsolutions7386
    @sengalsolutions738610 ай бұрын

    What a beautiful thing....say what you like about the Italians, but their planes looked gorgeous.

  • @armoredsaint6639

    @armoredsaint6639

    10 ай бұрын

    Well…….some of them did and some not so much! Lol

  • @jimdavis8391

    @jimdavis8391

    10 ай бұрын

    So are their women but they are a lot smaller!

  • @mazdaman2315

    @mazdaman2315

    10 ай бұрын

    The Italians make everything gorgeous including their women

  • @martinbrode7131

    @martinbrode7131

    10 ай бұрын

    ​@@armoredsaint6639Like some comments . re-😂.

  • @rameshbhattacharjee4374

    @rameshbhattacharjee4374

    10 ай бұрын

    The Italians Were Left Behind In Technology And Tactics During World War Two

  • @geraldtrudeau3223
    @geraldtrudeau322310 ай бұрын

    You did a fabulous job on researching this unusual airplane. It truly is a beautiful machine, and deserve to be remembered.

  • @aviationdeepdive

    @aviationdeepdive

    10 ай бұрын

    Definitely, it's quite surprising how little this plane is really talked about!

  • @lorenzogiuliani9144
    @lorenzogiuliani914410 ай бұрын

    Thank you. This floatplane was built in CRDA shipyard of my town; Monfalcone.

  • @hyperboy990

    @hyperboy990

    9 ай бұрын

    Ma i cantieri CANT non erano a Trieste?

  • @lolloblue9646

    @lolloblue9646

    Ай бұрын

    ​@@hyperboy990CANT aveva sede a Monfalcone, che al tempo era provincia di Trieste

  • @PiersLawsonBrown1972
    @PiersLawsonBrown197210 ай бұрын

    What a beautiful aircraft from the golden age of flight, such a shame that it never had a real chance to spread its wings. Thank you for this presentation.

  • @aviationdeepdive

    @aviationdeepdive

    10 ай бұрын

    Glad you enjoyed it

  • @mblaber2000
    @mblaber200010 ай бұрын

    The decade 1925-1935 started with wire braced, fabric covered biplanes with fixed landing gear and open cockpits. This decade ended with metal stressed skin monocoque, cantilever monoplanes with retractable landing gear and fully enclosed cockpits. Amazing advances. Arguably made possible by increases in engine horsepower from about 180 to 900 hp.

  • @dougsmith6793
    @dougsmith679310 ай бұрын

    Sheesh. As many of these aircraft vids as I've watched, I never knew about this particular aircraft. And it's one of the most beautiful, wonderful lines and balance, amazing performance, very ambitious project.

  • @marcusott2973
    @marcusott297310 ай бұрын

    I first saw this in an aerospace periodical from the 80's in a beautiful watercolor representation. It also had the last known sad picture of it burning on a lake after a late war raid. Wonderful informative video, on a beautiful, unique plane.

  • @aviationdeepdive

    @aviationdeepdive

    10 ай бұрын

    Oh wow - I couldn’t a picture like that anywhere! If you know what magazines it was, or if you by any chance have it please let me know

  • @marcusott2973

    @marcusott2973

    10 ай бұрын

    @aviationdeepdive it was the German language Aero magazin I saw it in, but I just checked the copyrights, it seems to only be a translation of an English language periodical as the copyrights go to Marshall Cavendish Ltd. 1983 and Aerospace Publishing Ltd. 1982. They had a lot watercolor illustrations, which I'm sure come out of one artist studio, that have also been used in war plane picture encyclopaedias since the late 60's early 70's.

  • @aviationdeepdive

    @aviationdeepdive

    10 ай бұрын

    @@marcusott2973 Interesting, I'll have to take a look, I try to compile as much info and photos as possible as this one of my favourite aircraft.

  • @ThreenaddiesRexMegistus
    @ThreenaddiesRexMegistus10 ай бұрын

    This plane is just ridiculously beautiful, almost as if they’d gone for streamlining and designed it from the outside in. Not unlike their big-3 fighters: Macchi Folgore, Fiat G55, and Reggiane Sagittario. It seems unlikely they received inspiration from Fairey or Blackburn. There really must be something the the adage “function follows form”. Could also have been a world-beater in early civil aviation had it been refitted with retractable undercarriage. It might have been the Italian Constellation. 👍🏻

  • @FifingFossil

    @FifingFossil

    10 ай бұрын

    I agree in every aspect. This airplane is definition of elegance, it looks like balerine dancing on stage. Edit: and fighters serie 5(and c.202) were like majestic war steeds.

  • @phaasch

    @phaasch

    9 ай бұрын

    Really well put. My own thoughts entirely. It's like something out of a Fred Astaire film- can picture him and Ginger flying down to Rio on it!

  • @cellpat2686
    @cellpat268610 ай бұрын

    Wow, just when I thought I had seen every aircraft built at that time here comes another one I knew nothing about. Thank you for this brief interesting story.

  • @holeshothunter5544
    @holeshothunter554410 ай бұрын

    I just saw a DC3 with floats on. The Italians certainly have more style than anyone else.

  • @emanemanrus5835

    @emanemanrus5835

    9 ай бұрын

    You've lost 2 more engines.

  • @RielMyricyne

    @RielMyricyne

    9 ай бұрын

    That's more like a DC4 with floats.

  • @AlbertaGeek
    @AlbertaGeek10 ай бұрын

    It really was a beautiful looking plane. Italians sure can design things.

  • @edwardrodgers9383
    @edwardrodgers938310 ай бұрын

    A beautiful and futuristic design to say the least!🤺

  • @americanrambler4972
    @americanrambler497210 ай бұрын

    This probably would have made a pretty good long range land based airliner. Probably would have added 30 mph to its speed, increased its payload and range. Could possibly have given the DC4 and constellation a run for its money.

  • @I7435IC

    @I7435IC

    8 ай бұрын

    Yea,, I'll bet it could of.

  • @benstark2065
    @benstark206510 ай бұрын

    Wow, what an incredible plane. Great video!

  • @aviationdeepdive

    @aviationdeepdive

    10 ай бұрын

    Thankyou!

  • @EstorilEm
    @EstorilEm10 ай бұрын

    Great channel and video, I’ll just point out that the R-2600 is a 14 cylinder engine, not 18. I’m only a stickler about this because it’s the engine we have in our TBM Avenger we fly around to air shows and such. VERY familiar with it. Sometimes I wish I wasn’t lol!

  • @aviationdeepdive

    @aviationdeepdive

    10 ай бұрын

    Ah you're totally right, don't know how that slipped through. That's awesome, you fly TBM Avengers to this day?

  • @EstorilEm

    @EstorilEm

    10 ай бұрын

    @@aviationdeepdive Yup, we are a CAF wing with a few other aircraft, but the Avenger is the one people really care about. 🙈 Our radius is usually ~250 mi tops from our base of ops though. At 70-80gph (130-150 takeoff) plus regular maintenance / volunteer hours, it’s really difficult to get to local shows, much less anything away from the mid Atlantic region of the US. The $$$ just isn’t in it anymore unfortunately.

  • @thegrayknight71
    @thegrayknight715 ай бұрын

    Wow I am shocked. I've never heard about this aeroplane before. It looks fantastic. Thx for a great video.

  • @StoneCresent
    @StoneCresent10 ай бұрын

    The Douglas XTB2D-1 Skypirate could carry up to four torpedos but was limited to two for carrier operations. It has a very similar payload capacity to the Z.511.

  • @Danger_mouse
    @Danger_mouse10 ай бұрын

    What a great looking aircraft

  • @sidefx996
    @sidefx99610 ай бұрын

    Another fantastic video. Been a lifelong aviation enthusiast and don’t remember ever seeing this before. Thank you, fantastic channel.

  • @aviationdeepdive

    @aviationdeepdive

    10 ай бұрын

    Thankyou so much! Appreciate that

  • @Joey_Nova
    @Joey_Nova10 ай бұрын

    thanks for the great clip! the footage was great!

  • @DylanThorne
    @DylanThorne3 ай бұрын

    Thanks for sharing this exquisitely beautiful plane.

  • @tsegulin
    @tsegulin10 ай бұрын

    Well presented, interesting documentary on a promising aircraft most people would never know. Thanks!

  • @clivestainlesssteelwomble7665
    @clivestainlesssteelwomble766510 ай бұрын

    Glad you covered this one .,.very elegant.

  • @letsseeif
    @letsseeif10 ай бұрын

    Thanks for your fascinating video history of the CANT Z511 Giant Floatplane. Really enjoyed it. Thanks again. Keep them coming. Melbourne.

  • @aviationdeepdive

    @aviationdeepdive

    10 ай бұрын

    Thankyou! Will do!

  • @lucashinch
    @lucashinch10 ай бұрын

    I am all around impressed! First time experiencing your channel. I subscribed within minutes. Thank you and best regards.

  • @aviationdeepdive

    @aviationdeepdive

    10 ай бұрын

    Thanks so much!

  • @lucashinch

    @lucashinch

    10 ай бұрын

    @@aviationdeepdiveyou're welcome!

  • @marcopolimeni2356
    @marcopolimeni235610 ай бұрын

    The same engineer Filippo Zappata made even an excellent helicopter after the war, the also forgotten Agusta A101G. Some US lobbies pushed the Italian government to produce under license in Italy the Sirkosky SH3D instead of the A101G.

  • @Toyota-ci3nj

    @Toyota-ci3nj

    10 ай бұрын

    It wasn’t a excellent helicopter it didn’t even go in production. SH3 is far superior.

  • @marcopolimeni2356

    @marcopolimeni2356

    10 ай бұрын

    @@Toyota-ci3nj In 1971 I was 16 years old and I went with my father, who was a pilot, to visit the Agusta helicopter factory in Cascina Costa near Milan. We were guided by a colleague of my father who was a Sirkosky SH3D test pilot; it was on that occasion that we saw a large Agusta 101G helicopter in a corner of a hangar and our guide told us that it was an excellent helicopter that never went into production despite its potential.

  • @AndreiTupolev
    @AndreiTupolev10 ай бұрын

    That's a very handsome thing. Looks like a wide body Focke-Wulf Condor

  • @atatexan
    @atatexan10 ай бұрын

    Fantastic work, sir. Bellisima!

  • @martinoppermann9868
    @martinoppermann98689 ай бұрын

    THank You for this really interessting story of this beautiful plane 🙂

  • @oscgra9416
    @oscgra941610 ай бұрын

    Realy good video, i love your content. A questions, do you have plans to talk about specific aircraft in the future? If so please talk about the Swedish shoot down DC-3/The Catalina affair, it is a realy unknown story but very interesting.

  • @aviationdeepdive

    @aviationdeepdive

    10 ай бұрын

    I definitely do like covering specific aircraft, I'll look into this incident! If you have any further info feel free to email it to me at aviationdeepdive@gmail.com

  • @endi3386
    @endi338610 ай бұрын

    Great video, was not indeed aware of this plane 👍

  • @hairydonuts6024
    @hairydonuts602410 ай бұрын

    What a beautiful aircraft! Excellent video: well researched with a decent script. The sound quality is alright, too BTW. Duly subscribed.

  • @aviationdeepdive

    @aviationdeepdive

    10 ай бұрын

    Many thanks!

  • @hairydonuts6024

    @hairydonuts6024

    10 ай бұрын

    You're welcome! @@aviationdeepdive

  • @Blockio1999
    @Blockio199910 ай бұрын

    Regarding the torpedo carrying capacity: There is one design that I'm aware of that has a similar load, equally never made it into full production: The Douglas Skypirate, an experimental torpedo bomber that was designed to serve on what would eventually become the Midway-class

  • @ursus9104
    @ursus910410 ай бұрын

    CANT built the most technically advanced aircraft in Italy during the 1930's - 1940's. Zappata was a genius in the italian aeronautical industry but due to shortage of raw materials they didn’t have the capacity for mass production.

  • @vladilenkalatschev4915
    @vladilenkalatschev491510 ай бұрын

    What a masterpiece ❤

  • @Brightsideofmilitary
    @Brightsideofmilitary10 ай бұрын

    Great content

  • @davidmok108
    @davidmok10810 ай бұрын

    Liked and subscribed! Amazing channel! Keep it up!

  • @aviationdeepdive

    @aviationdeepdive

    10 ай бұрын

    Thank you! Will do!

  • @warpartyattheoutpost4987
    @warpartyattheoutpost498710 ай бұрын

    Inspiring video! Now I'm adding these planes as an option for the Italy player in our Axis&Allies Global 1940 house rules. I found some 3D printed miniatures of them in 1/900 scale online!

  • @patrickwatrin5093

    @patrickwatrin5093

    10 ай бұрын

    Booyah

  • @pascalcoole2725
    @pascalcoole272510 ай бұрын

    Such a beautifull aircraft. Hope someone makes a model !

  • @salvagedb2470
    @salvagedb247010 ай бұрын

    Amazing vid on an even more amazing Aircraft , this plane put the Condor in the shade and if it had went on after the War it would have spat on the Brabizon , an it was only another 77ft longer..an got nowhere ..Good vid again.

  • @brianmuhlingBUM
    @brianmuhlingBUM10 ай бұрын

    Great! More please! 😊

  • @TheLateBird7
    @TheLateBird710 ай бұрын

    I CANT get enough of those sleek lines ...

  • @aviationdeepdive

    @aviationdeepdive

    10 ай бұрын

    It's truly one of the most beautiful planes ever! (aaand I just got the dad joke...)

  • @doncarlo5
    @doncarlo510 ай бұрын

    what a beautiful aircraft … it truly is … It‘s a shame that everything about this airplane was lost … I wonder if there are still some blueprints … somewhere … in some archives

  • @aviationdeepdive

    @aviationdeepdive

    10 ай бұрын

    I'm sure there is more to be found. When I'm next in Italy I might do some research, find out the appropriate archives and drop in to see if I can find anything. If I can, I'll likely make a 'deep dive' episode on its history that's a bit more thorough and more like 30-45 mins.

  • @MarkkuKoljonenwTinja
    @MarkkuKoljonenwTinja10 ай бұрын

    Thanks!

  • @eugenio16arno
    @eugenio16arno10 ай бұрын

    Bellissimo documentario! Grazie!

  • @jasperzanjani
    @jasperzanjani9 ай бұрын

    why have I only just discovered this channel? Also, thank you for taking the trouble to try to pronounce these foreign names correctly

  • @Ralphieboy
    @Ralphieboy10 ай бұрын

    Sorry to hear about the copywright controversy, but your films are great! I love inter-war transitional types

  • @buggerall
    @buggerall10 ай бұрын

    She's a beauty! A Constellation on floats.

  • @buckwheatINtheCity
    @buckwheatINtheCity10 ай бұрын

    Very Impressive! Anyone who thinks that the Italians could never match the other major powers in design and aviation, better rethink. This aircraft was arguably better than even the PBY Catalina and the British Sunderland flying boat. The problem for the Italians appear to have been prioritization. Not only did they not produce it in respectable numbers, they never really used the aircraft in any capacity. Axis strategy prioritized medium bombers over larger, more expensive to produce four engine bombers. The failure was in the short sighted leadership. In sufficient numbers, this aircraft could have even reached the factories producing armaments deep inside the Soviet Union.

  • @charlesrousseau6837
    @charlesrousseau683710 ай бұрын

    Beautiful aircraft. That tail is so Italian. It has always puzzled me why Italy didn't have good aviation engines in WW2 considering that their Fiat and Isotta-Fraschini Schneider Cup engines were highly developed. Thank you for the nice video.

  • @AndreiTupolev

    @AndreiTupolev

    10 ай бұрын

    I think they were far too complicated and maintenance-intensive to be put into large scale production and used on front-line aircraft

  • @lucapoli4195

    @lucapoli4195

    10 ай бұрын

    It was because the government decided to swap to radial engine for military use, while the industry focused mainly on linear engine until then. This caused a lot of problem for lack of research and know-how at the time in the country.

  • @nicolasroirand8011
    @nicolasroirand80113 ай бұрын

    Bonjour , merci beaucoup . Bon choix d'avion .

  • @birdzzzondayflu2489
    @birdzzzondayflu24892 ай бұрын

    My grandpa was a flight engineer in Mariner in WW2 - his crew came together to fly a plane from Hawaii to the forward operating base - after that point they flew recon off Iwo Jima and then Okinawa where they were shot down - my grandpa said you would see a bunch of Japanese zeroes fly overhead… then later a bunch of American fighters would play overhead - eventually the zeroes would stop coming and the rescuers came in

  • @CocoaBeachLiving
    @CocoaBeachLiving10 ай бұрын

    They made big look amazing 👍

  • @soundknight
    @soundknight10 ай бұрын

    What an awesome test pilot!

  • @wernerschulte6245
    @wernerschulte624510 ай бұрын

    Thank you for this really interesting video! I do know something about aircrafts and engines. However, I never have heard about Radials from Alpha Romeo or Piaggio. The italian streamline design of the CANT looks pretty good, even today. A pity, they scrapped them.

  • @petesheppard1709
    @petesheppard170910 ай бұрын

    I hope your appeal worked! A beautiful aircraft; I am also enjoying learning about the innovation and quality of the Italian aircraft industry.

  • @aviationdeepdive

    @aviationdeepdive

    10 ай бұрын

    Still waiting for news on the appeal - thanks for the comment!

  • @petesheppard1709

    @petesheppard1709

    10 ай бұрын

    @@aviationdeepdive Have you looked into other platforms like Playeur?

  • @TheIndianalain
    @TheIndianalain10 ай бұрын

    One of the most beautiful airplane I ever saw, truly a Ferrari of the sky!

  • @regioammiraglio7500
    @regioammiraglio750010 ай бұрын

    Also the aircraft was also planned to be used in an opeartion against the American fleet in new York. Indeed the aircraft was capable of carry 4 Maiale sub platform (the same that sunk the two british bb at Alexandria). The operation gained a lot of interest and it was also planned to appen but the armistice of 1943 destroyed any possibility

  • @alvaroherrera5279
    @alvaroherrera527910 ай бұрын

    Bellísimo!

  • @alan-sk7ky
    @alan-sk7ky10 ай бұрын

    Elegant. Was there to be a wheeled version I wonder.

  • @aviationdeepdive

    @aviationdeepdive

    10 ай бұрын

    No mention of that in my sources, but I hope to do to more research

  • @danieleregoli812
    @danieleregoli81210 ай бұрын

    What an astonishing design! Zappata went on to design (and build) the equally impressive BZ 308....

  • @eol6632
    @eol663210 ай бұрын

    Funny, I was looking for this plane on wikipedia 2 weeks ago but couldn't remember it's name. I've only seen it mentioned in a war aviation documentary. It was in regards to a viable attempts to launch an attack on the us east cost. Plan was to refule via a Uboat. They mentioned this aircraft was the only viable means to make the plan work. Add it to the long list of great Italian pre WW2 aircraft forced into a roll it wasn't suited for

  • @billsmith5166
    @billsmith516610 ай бұрын

    Nice looking aerodynamic fuselage. The wing root looks really thin for that time although the horizontal stabilizer bracing looks like a dated shortcut. Overall it kind of reminds me of the Constellation.

  • @drdoolittle5724
    @drdoolittle572410 ай бұрын

    Excellent, thank you for producing for us! Shows yet again human intransigence, a wheeled version would have possibly been a total success, those floats weight and drag.........?????

  • @aviationdeepdive

    @aviationdeepdive

    10 ай бұрын

    Interesting idea! Floats are often less draggy than people assume, and weight doesn't have tooo much of an effect on top speed - so a fairly modest speed increase is probably likely. A land-based version would definitely have been cool to see, though it does look awfully good as a floatplane!

  • @rbilleaud
    @rbilleaud10 ай бұрын

    I've never understood the failure of the Regia Aeronautica during the war. Perhaps lack of ability to produce aircraft in the quantities required, or being late to the game, but in terms of design, no one can doubt that the G.55, C.205 and Re.2005 were fine aircraft. BTW, I recommend a video on the IAR 80. It was quite an effort by the Romanians.

  • @aviationdeepdive

    @aviationdeepdive

    10 ай бұрын

    Definitely a good idea, I'll put it on the list!

  • @jfangm

    @jfangm

    10 ай бұрын

    I think it was a combination of ack of numbers, experience, effective tactics, and ability to adapt that caused their failure. Like literally everyone else, they would have been VERY competitive had the war, as it was by 1941, started in 1935.

  • @AndreiTupolev

    @AndreiTupolev

    10 ай бұрын

    Much like Japan, they valued maneuverability over everything else until they were overtaken by the opposition, and by the time advanced second generation were available there weren't the experienced pilots or the fuel available to make the most of them

  • @jimdavis8391

    @jimdavis8391

    10 ай бұрын

    ​@@AndreiTupolevThat and the fact that Italian industrial capacity was tiny compared with Germany, France and Britain.

  • @marcopolimeni2356

    @marcopolimeni2356

    10 ай бұрын

    The weak point of the Italian industry has always been the low availability of raw materials in the country. The failure of the Regia Aeronautica is due to the wrong choices of Mussolini, who in the mid-1930s spent enormous resources in the colonial war to invade Ethiopia and in the Spanish Civil War. Finally he entered the war on Hitler's side without having the necessary resources to make a war that lasted much longer than a few months as hoped.

  • @timwatson3879
    @timwatson387910 ай бұрын

    ..the old adage, "If it looks good, It flies good" certainly was true of this plane....

  • @timcargile1562
    @timcargile15628 ай бұрын

    Thanks for covering this interesting aircraft. I guess a flying boat was out of the question for some reason. Pherhaps the envisioned an eventual land plane only verstion in the future.

  • @davidvavra9113
    @davidvavra911310 ай бұрын

    Thanks

  • @danhubert-hx4ss
    @danhubert-hx4ss10 ай бұрын

    Most interesting. Forza Italia!

  • @167curly
    @167curly2 ай бұрын

    Such a sleek float plane.

  • @I7435IC
    @I7435IC8 ай бұрын

    Best looking Italian Plane I've ever seen !! Would make a Steller R/C model ! Wonder if anybody's made one yet ??

  • @kennedysingh3916
    @kennedysingh391610 ай бұрын

    Watched from Old Harbour Jamaica. It was a eautiful aircraft.

  • @mohabatkhanmalak1161
    @mohabatkhanmalak116110 ай бұрын

    What a beautiful aircraft. Those magnificent men 🛩and their flying machines.!! Noticed it had a longer range than the Focke Wulf 'Condor', 4352 Km against the Condor's 3560 Kms. It was a bit faster too, but the payload was twice that of the Condor. A specially prepared version of this aircraft could have easily done the eastern Europe to Japan flight. And, a maritime ⚓version operating in the mediterranean, Atlantic and Indian oceans would have been a challenging foe.✈

  • @FrancescoAlois
    @FrancescoAlois10 ай бұрын

    A great plane!

  • @terencewong-lane4309
    @terencewong-lane430910 ай бұрын

    Get the book - "Le navi aeree di Filippo Zappata" by Giorgio Evangelisti......

  • @aviationdeepdive

    @aviationdeepdive

    10 ай бұрын

    Unfortunately I don't speak Italian...

  • @silviopfeifer8094
    @silviopfeifer809410 ай бұрын

    such a great airplan. it is alway very sad that nothing is left from it to watch it in a museum. :(

  • @johnholt890
    @johnholt89010 ай бұрын

    Would love to get hold of 1/72 Vac Form kit of this.

  • @janmale7767
    @janmale776710 ай бұрын

    The italians are marvelous Engineers,with a flair for the beautifull,they suffered from being a relatively small nation with a smalish economy to match, but bursting with innovative Engineering talent!

  • @Paladin1873
    @Paladin187310 ай бұрын

    Every aircraft designer should be onboard the first test flight of their creation.

  • @lolloblue9646
    @lolloblue9646Ай бұрын

    Yeah Idrogigante is a fitting name for this behemoth

  • @mycosys
    @mycosys10 ай бұрын

    Wow. If they had built that marine patrol version they would probably still be flying today. The famous P-3 Orion still used for marine duties is just a Lockheed Electra from 1957, the Nimrod that was relatively recently withdrawn for being too expensive to operate was the De-Havilland Comet, The HC-130/PC-130 Hercules fills a similar role and has been flying since 1954, Russia still flies the IL-38 based on the IL-18 from '56. Theyre being replaced by stuff like the ATR-72, DHC Dash8, and specialised military transports. Patrol craft are among the oldest craft flying, because the low, slow, long endurance heavy duty airliners of old are far better suited than most modern aircraft, and designing a new aircraft just for a few patrol craft would not make sense when old airliners are near perfect. Imagine this thing re-engined with the PT6 for efficiency and reliability........ Theres still so many places something like this with its range, payload and rough water capability would be relevant.

  • @robertbalazslorincz8218
    @robertbalazslorincz82189 ай бұрын

    If you can fly the thing using engine power differential, and just rudder... that plane works. (Damn, I always thought this thing was the size of a Condor but its more like the size of a Super Connie, good Lord)

  • @raccoon874
    @raccoon87410 ай бұрын

    *How much DRAG did those floats create?!! Two engines JUST to counteract that!*

  • @RielMyricyne
    @RielMyricyne9 ай бұрын

    Impressive, when you think that the Douglas DC-4 was a large airliner for the time. This Z.511 is very comparable to a DC-4 : same length, larger winhspan, larger wing area, similar empty weight, similar gross weight, similar engines.

  • @adriaanboogaard8571
    @adriaanboogaard857110 ай бұрын

    The U.S.A.did something similar with the D.C.3 also known as in the military C47. Very interesting. They Remind me of after a two year old walking in there parent's big shoes .

  • @richvalenzi6232
    @richvalenzi62327 ай бұрын

    Boy, the nose and windscreen really looks like a Lockheed Connie.

  • @oiergarcia7533
    @oiergarcia753310 ай бұрын

    Am i the only one Who thinks this looks like a fw Condor with floats?

  • @coreyandnathanielchartier3749
    @coreyandnathanielchartier374910 ай бұрын

    Another advantage over the Condor would be the ability to be refueled and rearmed at sea from a tender ship or tanker sub.

  • @williamenriquesanchezcolme753
    @williamenriquesanchezcolme75310 ай бұрын

    Thanks for such a good video. On the other han, fate does not exist.

  • @aviationdeepdive

    @aviationdeepdive

    10 ай бұрын

    I never said fate existed, I said the fate of the aircraft was unnecessary. In that context 'fate' just means what ended up happening to them.

  • @williamenriquesanchezcolme753

    @williamenriquesanchezcolme753

    10 ай бұрын

    @@aviationdeepdive OK. Thank you. I will watch your other videos because are good. Well done man.

  • @aviationdeepdive

    @aviationdeepdive

    10 ай бұрын

    @@williamenriquesanchezcolme753 Thanks!

  • @domenicozagari2443
    @domenicozagari244310 ай бұрын

    Hughes tried to beat it but failed :)

  • @adriaanboogaard8571
    @adriaanboogaard857110 ай бұрын

    The Improved Catalina is Making a comeback and Japan has a variant. The Sea planes have great fore fighting capabilities as long as they have water close to land on. If it worked before upgrade it and put it back to work

  • @igotatan1
    @igotatan110 ай бұрын

    The Spruce Goose was the largest float plane ever made. It was designed to carry 150,000 pounds (68,000 kg), 750 fully equipped troops or two 30-ton M4 Sherman tanks.

  • @aviationdeepdive

    @aviationdeepdive

    10 ай бұрын

    Spruce Goose is a flying boat, not a floatplane.

  • @comentedonakeyboard
    @comentedonakeyboard10 ай бұрын

    The airborn submarine option seems perfect for the Bolivian navy.

  • @guaporeturns9472
    @guaporeturns94724 күн бұрын

    Cardboard/wood control rods for ailerons? Metal doesn’t expand when it’s wet.. did I miss something?

  • @LittleNala
    @LittleNala9 ай бұрын

    Off-topic, but that Macchi seaplane design looks suspiciously like a Supermarine Schneider Trophy winner from the late 1920s. Please don't tell me our beloved Spitfire (of which I built so many Airfix kits in the 1960s), developed from that seaplane, was based on an Italian design! No disrespect to Italian design - I'm sure all seaplanes of that time had a lot of similarities. And I just found out that they stopped holding the contests because Supermarine kept winning, so they gave the trophy to the British in perpetuity.

  • @cowboywoodard2569
    @cowboywoodard256910 ай бұрын

    Gorgeous

  • @CONNELL19511216
    @CONNELL195112169 ай бұрын

    Those floats must have been a serious source of drag

  • @ninjalanternshark1508
    @ninjalanternshark15082 ай бұрын

    Too bad they never got a prototype built of that military version, because I would love to see that behemoth in War Thunder.

Келесі