the first mission impossible had no business looking this good
Фильм және анимация
#MissionImpossible #TomCruise #videoessay
Link to the second half of the video: • the second half of the...
// Follow me on Instagram: bydannyboyd?igs...
// Support me on Patreon: / cinemastix
With the release of the seven the Mission Impossible movie, Dead Reckoning Part I, I wanted to take a look back at the original Mission Impossible movie, from 1996. This isn't just a great action film... or a great Tom Cruise movie... it's a beautifully shot suspense thriller with visuals that frankly astound me every time I watch it. Director Brian De Palma and his long-time cinematographer, Stephen Burum, put their all into crafting a tense and subdued first entry into the franchise. Mission Impossible wouldn't be what it is today without this movie. And while each new Mission Impossible film has found a way to triumph over the last, Tom Cruise's first foray will always remain a classic.
Written & edited by Danny Boyd
Пікірлер: 1 300
Watch Part 2: kzread.info/dash/bejne/eI6K2teToLLThag.html So.. Similar to what happened a few months ago with my Rocky video, when I went to upload this video in its entirety it got automatically copyright claimed. Yet, for reasons I can only begin to theorize over, when I tried cutting it in half, and trying each part separately, it was fine..? I’m used to videos getting claimed and not making any money off of them. It sucks. But it is what it is. The reason this is a big deal in these cases is that the original, uncut version of this video was over 8 minutes. That means, when it gets claimed, all ad types, including mid-rolls, get automatically place on it. As a rule, I don’t enable mid-rolls on my channel because.. I mean.. they’re the worst. But with a claim, I not only lose control over whether they get turned on in the first place-I also can’t control where in the video they get run. And that’s just terrible. I realize, of course, that by cutting my video in half myself, your viewing experience is still getting disrupted. Which I regret. At least this way, though, I get to choose a natural break point myself. And because each half is unclaimed when uploaded separately, I’m able to turn off monetization altogether for part 2 so that you (hopefully) don’t get an ad before watching it (because if you did, that would kind of defeat the whole point). Anyway, I’m sorry for the disruption and the weird bandage solution. I just want to give you the best experience I can, always. And I hope this is all understandable. Thank you all so much for your continued support! A few obstacles is worth it to get to do what I love and to share these movies with you :) -Danny
@wasdesdf8453
Жыл бұрын
:(
@kingbartholomewthe1above317
Жыл бұрын
Film companies should be paying you to make this content. Its good publicity.
@FelixWongTheFelixWong
Жыл бұрын
You need to get your content into Nebula.
@CinemaStix
Жыл бұрын
I wish! That would give me the opportunity to remaster all my older stuff with higher quality assets. Anyway, it’s by invitation. I just have to wait and see if it happens. :)
@robinchoudhury2309
Жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for great content!
I always loved how dark and mysterious the first mission impossible film was. Almost film noir-esque.
@TheTuttle99
Жыл бұрын
It always scared me as a kid, something about it. I need a rewatch
@Davidsworldtravels
Жыл бұрын
Yes it’s got an edgier feel and is definitely more about mystery and knowing who to trust. Now they pretty much bailed on all that to make it straightforward action.
@FreeCatCheese
Жыл бұрын
Absolutely, which is why I made mention of Anthony Waller (Mute Witness) and Dick Maas (Amsterdamned, Do Not Disturb) as more worthy directors for II and III than Woo and Abrams.
@denniszenanywhere
Жыл бұрын
De Palma and most of the writers back then were cleasrly influenced by Hollywood 40s film noir and 60s and 70s European cinema.
@Devil-Made
Жыл бұрын
Me too! It’s always been my favorite in the franchise. I’ve been so mystified whenever I hear that it’s not a popular film. To me, it’s one of the best movies. Period. But it’s also top tier mission impossible. That dark, brooding, noir tone has never been back and it’s so unfortunate, imo. But I doubt the franchise would’ve lasted this long had that tone stuck around. It’s just not what the “masses” want.
i really love how bold the first scene was by showing that nobody is safe - there is no plot armor. plus i love all the details and practical effects of spying (sarah spraying perfume with a heat signature, ethan sprinkling glass outside the floor to spot intruders) it makes it seem so gritty and realistic
@benquinneyiii7941
Жыл бұрын
Is only defined
@barriobeatproducciones3355
11 ай бұрын
I felt they got rid of the secondary characters, so it could be a Tom Cruise movie. I didn't love that, but I liked the movie anyway.
@alessandroguarrera2203
10 ай бұрын
That's not what plot armour means, though. Every character dies when a script or story requires them to. Plot armour is when they reasonably should have died, more than once, and survived due to implausible means. It's the same issue as a Deus Ex Machina, some of the curtain is peeled back and suspension of disbelief is strained.@@accidentcellar6307
@dixonhill1108
10 ай бұрын
I wish they'd make a sequel, a real sequel.
@ceirwan
10 ай бұрын
@@accidentcellar6307 Sure, but if you take it that far, then you're describing every book and every film that's a work of fiction.
"...a three a.m. ephemerality." Nicely done.
"Kittridge, you haven't seen me upset" One of my all time favourite films.
Having re-watched the entirety of the MI series in the leadup to Dead Reckoning Pt. 1 I cannot get over how ballsy the opening of this movie must've seemed in the 90s, just killing EVERYONE off and having the nice old guy you think you can trust turn out to be the big bad. Plus, it really sets up Ethan in the subsequent films especially from Ghost Protocol onward - he will throw himself into the fire to spare his team, without a thought because he knows what might be at stake.
@brianbadonde9251
Жыл бұрын
Uh.. Spoiler alert??
@Comakino
Жыл бұрын
It really wrong-footed a lot of people, but in hindsight it's great
@jvillanueva7707
Жыл бұрын
Yes. It really flipped things around because the protagonist of the Mission Impossible series, and all the lead characters aside from the prettyboy character were basically killed off in the first parts of the movie. And of course it was a real plot twist when the main bad guy was revealed.
@dynasty701
Жыл бұрын
@@brianbadonde9251uh, spoilers for a 27 year old movie
@darwinwins
Жыл бұрын
i dislike so much the sequels as they always go down the road of "protagonist is a rogue agent" trope. it's marginally worse than the "bad guy gets caught on purpose" trope.
I was absolutely in love with Emmanuelle Béart when I was a kid. One of life's great beauties. Classic film.
It’s quite subtly Brian DePalma’s best flick !
Good timing. Before knowing anything about cinematography, as a kid I could tell there was something special about the light in the Prague sequences. It’s so rewarding to hear you put that feeling into professional words that now make sense as an adult. Thank you 🙏
@CinemaStix
Жыл бұрын
Same here! Growing up it always put me into this super weird mood, and I could never put my finger on what it was. I’d been wanting to make a video on it for ages.
@imarchello
Жыл бұрын
Nostalgia. Rewatch it again.
@LuisSierra42
Жыл бұрын
@@imarchello just did
@enthusia86
Жыл бұрын
Same. Saw this as a ten year old and it blew my mind. Rewatched it on VHS countless times. Never noticed that there are hardly an shots fired and no shootouts and there's still so much tension. I love the film even more now.
DePalma directed the shit out of this one. The other sequels have still used directors with unique styles (especially Woo and Bird) but DePalma's style works so well for the spy genre, before the films became more reverse engineered from cool stunt ideas. I would love to see them return to a more bare bones, spycraft focused thriller that's more grounded but as highly stylized as this one, throwing every trick in the book to prioritize atmosphere and tension building. DePalma had a strong background in horror films so I think someone like Guillermo Del Toro, Sam Raimi or if they wanted to take a chance on someone like Aneesh Chaganty I think could also do a good job.
@ComedyBros5
Жыл бұрын
Yes! I don’t see how they could go any other direction for Part 2 with all the insane stunt sequences they’ve pulled off. It’d be very fitting to send off the series the same way it started: simple, but very tense and entertaining.
@_CoasterNinja
Жыл бұрын
Denis Villeneuve!
@mrbluebell2735
Жыл бұрын
I'd like to see a Robert Rodriguez MI. His own twist and payoff style would be closer to the TV series, though unlikely for a feature film. That said, if there's a director who can do a decent modern reboot of the original it'll be him.
@ComedyBros5
Жыл бұрын
@@mrbluebell2735 Rodriguez would ruin this franchise at this point in his career. haha
@mrbluebell2735
Жыл бұрын
@@ComedyBros5 he would be respectful of the given material and certainly refrain from butchering an Espionage thriller into incomprehension. I grew up on the original/sequal MI in the 70's and 80's from reruns. The team are not these lone wolf and pretty super agents seen today. They were infiltrators, mimics and saboteurs. Their efforts were near invisible to the marks (plus audience) Till the final reveal. Granted the subterfuge is unlikely to appeal to the hyper active modern cinema audience. But a short tv series in the hands of a director known for landing a surprise? That's a worthwhile exploration.
Thank Brian De Palma.
I'm glad they brought the late night noir elements back for Fallout and Dead Reckoning.
I think people forget that De Palma directed this. They have just been turning them out so long that people forget that there was once only one Mission Impossible movie.
Fun Fact: While filming the famous scene where Tom Cruise drops from the ceiling and hovers inches above the ground, Cruise's head kept hitting the floor until he got the idea to put coins in his shoes for balance.
@thelastmethbender7385
Жыл бұрын
That sounds painful
@DisposableSupervillainHenchman
Жыл бұрын
Maybe Tom Cruise just had too many thetans left in his body at the time? 🤷🏻♂️👽
@ey5373
Жыл бұрын
Wrong. It was for height! For height! To be taller!
@AMAli-ct5df
Жыл бұрын
@@ey5373😂😂😂
@AMAli-ct5df
Жыл бұрын
@@ey5373the man do not heights the heights needs him
"De Palma can use a camera well" what an astute observation, a very original take.
the actress was breath taking
Best one
This movie is by far the most sophisticated of them, and my favorite. Besides the amazing directing, cinematography, casting and music, I was surprised to notice afterwards there wasn't even any cursing.
@miked1869
Жыл бұрын
I can't be sure without rewatching them, but I think minimal cursing is a staple of this franchise. I did watch Fallout again recently (partly to verify for myself that yes, it is a better movie than DR1) - and when one character suddenly used the f-word quite a way in, it was quite jarring and made me realise that might be the only instance of it in the whole film.
@DarkoBert-ob6yr
Жыл бұрын
100%
@thomasstudstrup5028
Жыл бұрын
You must not like the action and the awesome stunts in all the other movies then. And I bet youy loved it that there is no swearing.
@FrancoisDressler
Жыл бұрын
@@miked1869 How bizarre. The shooting and killing was fine though?
@miked1869
Жыл бұрын
@@FrancoisDressler Americans. 🤷♂️
YES! Thank you. The first Mission Impossible got more care and craft than any action movie I can think of. It's more of a movie than any of the others and it feels organic and pointed and masterful.
@thomasstudstrup5028
Жыл бұрын
Bla bla bla bla.
i agree
I usually dislike clips where the only the clip creator speaks, with no dialogue from the movie. But this is excellent.
That was called cinematography. It was a big thing in the 90s. It basically doesn’t really exist anymore nowadays.
@JDoe-gf5oz
Жыл бұрын
Hey now. Why learn cinematography when you can just aim your glorified iphone at a greenscreen and have some underpaid computer nerds CG everything in?
That, for me, is why M:I 1 felt more like a spy vs. spy or espionage film than all the other films. It build tension and suspense until every so often a set-piece came in for the pay-off. That’s why I love this movie to this day.
@filmflim
Жыл бұрын
Absolutely, the first one certainly belongs more to the spy movie suspense thriller and the paranoia films of the 70s. There’s only one true action setpiece and that’s the train scene at the end.
I'm surprised so much happened in a movie me and my dad struggled to stay awake watching
one of my favorites
After almost thirty years watching this movie, this video FINALLY explains why I've always loved the look of MI1. It is a canvass that looks so good, you wanna walk over to the screen and lick it, hoping you'd be sucked into that world of intrigue and mystery.
@Cherb123456
Жыл бұрын
Poetic~ thanks for that
@mikeblin9614
Жыл бұрын
Sir, what?
@bloodpuke4146
Жыл бұрын
Lick it 😂
@SuryaGupta-te7fq
9 ай бұрын
why is the new mission impossible movie rated high? I only sat through the whole thing because of the ratings, I thought I missed something but no, its just an incredibly boring 5/10 movie that is rated 8/10 everywhere else. These modern movies will get worse and worse until theres no more standards left and every film is called a masterpiece
@Ugarte211
9 ай бұрын
@@SuryaGupta-te7fq I share your same exact sentiments. I've been watching older movies a LOT recently, and they are a billion times more entertaining and valuable than most of the junk coming out today.
I was a 12 yrs old Italian kid at the time, I've seen this movie in a theater with my father and loved it. When the VHS came out I asked my dad to buy it and we would watch it again from time to time. Still my fav Mission impossible... and Jean Reno :D
@thomasstudstrup5028
Жыл бұрын
Oh and number 3, 4 and 5 are not nearly as good right?? Jesus Christ!!
@emilezoulette882
11 ай бұрын
is it possible that now you have aged, you are no longer italian ?
@user-tm9ho3bm4v
10 ай бұрын
@@emilezoulette882 😂😂
@404invalidERROR
5 ай бұрын
I read your comment with an italian accent :D
Literally how beautiful it looks but more than that i amazed how mysterious gloomy and dark environment with cinematography match strory is very mysterious
The aquarium scene is top tier.
Actually, the villain in the first movie is the main character from the show.
I've always loved this MI - the sequels can't hold a candle to it.
first film was amazing.
Honestly, I don't really consider the first Mission: Impossible an action movie at all, it's first and foremost a thriller and a drama, and only really has twoish action scenes, the break in at the CIA and the ending with the train
@aliendroneservices6621
Жыл бұрын
And the fishtank restaurant.
@Mark_LaCroix
Жыл бұрын
@@aliendroneservices6621 I wouldn't call the fish tank scene an action scene. It was technically a stunt, yes, with an impressive practical special effect, but just because something explodes doesn't make it an action scene.
I love how the first Mission Impossible was an actual espionage movie.
@lampoil6280
Жыл бұрын
and the only actual mission impossible movie. the rest were mindless crap
@blackberyy3450
Жыл бұрын
@@lampoil6280hey respect some of the others
The OG and the best from the bunch!!!
@DarkoBert-ob6yr
Жыл бұрын
Definitely
i would expect nothing less from a Brian De Palma film.
Best mission impossible movie by far
The cafe scene where Ethan is learning he's going to be set up for the death of his team, is incredible, really ghoulish and scary.
"MY TEAM IS DEAD, THEY'ER OOOAAALLL DEAD!"
Totally agree about Prague. This movie made me enthralled with the place.
Just re-watched it today. It's a completely different experience from today's Mission Impossible films, incredible nonetheless. In my opinion this film has the most "style" in terms of directorial style, apart from MI:2, which for me falls short story wise. I can't also help but notice how this film paves the way for Ethan Hunt's entire character. Here he risks the lives of his friends for the mission, eventually losing them, something that the present Ethan would never do.
@tasken_lander_redux4775
Жыл бұрын
Literally did the same thing. First time rewatching it since '96. I was utterly impressed with its starkly different tone and style compared to the later entries (which really aren't my cup of tea TBH). I absolutely enjoyed its noir-esque and tension-filled execution. Which the series had continued on a little further in this style honestly.
@Ryan-bw9to
Жыл бұрын
Mission impossible 1 is just in a league of their own from all the other mission impossible movies. With the main premise of the plot being a mole hunt, it really sets itself up for being a mystery aspect which all the others lack.
@DarkoBert-ob6yr
Жыл бұрын
Lets face it the other ones can't hold a candle to this first one.
@fbassi20
5 ай бұрын
MI:2 is one of the worst films I've ever seen
Of all the Mission Impossible films, I only remember the plot of this first one.
its still my fav amongst all 7
This video is superbly written, narrated and edited! Thank you!
I will never forget the whole train sequence back in cinemas in 1996, from the longest zoom from the hills surrounding the high speed train to the wagon window with the "mole" to the final showdown with the copter into the Channel following the train. Amazing visuals for the time
Damn. You're right. There were no shoot outs. Weird nowadays
I love the mix of big blockbuster and looking like vintage DePalma
It was shot unbelievably well! Brian De Palma knew what he was doing.
literally one of my favorite franchises, I am so beyond excited for Dead Reckoning
@CinemaStix
Жыл бұрын
Meeee too.
Sooo good 👍 unforgettable movie
what a pleasant video
This subtlety is something I miss from the mission impossible or any action franchise these days … it was simply beautiful
Still the best by far. The scene where the mission goes wrong, the twists, excellent.
its a masterpiece ive always thought so
in Mission Impossible Fallout, when they filmed the cop killing scene, they shot it practically at location so they set up tarps so the public couldn't see what's happening. That segment ended up being just in his imagination, and it looked like a dream sequence due to the soft lighting. In a movie where you weren't supposed to believe what you are looking at many times, you had a feeling that something was off in that scene.
When I watch something like this, it makes me realize how much of an art it is and why most movies today have no soul, aside from relying too much on CGI.
@DarkoBert-ob6yr
Жыл бұрын
yes
One of the first big-budget films to be shot in Prague. 😎
'...your classic spy on spy antagony' (4:08). Thank you, Sir, for using an elegant and apt, although obsolete, word.
Yess! I made a review on this a while back, and my main focus was on how this wasn't an action movie at all. You pretty much nailed it. Great essay!
This is still the best of the series. I’d say MI3 is a close second.
3:35 easily my favorite bit of lighting change in the film. the green/yellow smokkkeeeeee
It's those old Panavision Panaflexes. We need them back.
Awesome video! Great content, commentary, homage to a beautiful film in a large franchise, and a perfect length!
@CinemaStix
Жыл бұрын
:D
A great many 90s action films were glorious to watch in part because their filmmakers’ much closer proximity to THEIR favorite filmmakers and artistic influences-who had been far purer storytellers. A lot of filmmakers today divide their focus on too many other priorities besides storytelling; whereas guys like Spielberg (thank god he’s still around), Villaneuve, Fincher, and just a handful of others maximize their storytelling with every frame, other filmmakers squander their frames on other crap, like with pandering or emulation.
I never appreciated the split diopter shots as a kid. Whenever I see them now I always appreciate them.
The first one is the real one for me. Very well shot, written and acted.
the sequence on the top of the bullet-train will always stand out to me as one of the best of those types of sequences. it not only felt real and incredibly dangerous.. but stylishly filmed
@DarkoBert-ob6yr
Жыл бұрын
yep
@thomasstudstrup5028
Жыл бұрын
That scene was shot in a studio in front of a green screen. It did not feel real or dangerous. It looked incredibly fake. I guess you dont like the real stunts on real locations in every other movie in the franchise.
@swish007
Жыл бұрын
@@thomasstudstrup5028 no it looked real, you're wrong
I feel the exact same way with Constantine. Absolutely gorgeous movie that goes way harder than it needed to.
One of the best action spy movies ever. I watched it over and over as a kid
I remember how it took me 20 years to understand the plot of this movie
Despite the many sequels, the recent ones being especially praised, I still always love this first installment. Particularly for the reasons this video points out. Very Hitchcockian
Btw your videos are the best. I really miss every frame a painting and in my mind your a successor, bringing wonderfully creative essays with great insight and opening my eyes to things i didnt see before
@cbalan777
Жыл бұрын
What happened to every frame?
@TheeRogerWayne
Жыл бұрын
@@cbalan777KZread gets tired of giving people money who have no original content, and just put their voice over someone else’s work.
@maciejglinski6564
Жыл бұрын
@@cbalan777 They just decided to pursue other work. It was 7 years ago so i don't think it's still news
@maciejglinski6564
Жыл бұрын
@@TheeRogerWayne coul you elaborate on that? Who says that they have no original content and whos work they have been stealing?
i recently saw the 1st, hands down it is the best
The best MI.. it was so cool when it came out. Brian de Palma was awesome
It was a Brian De Palma film, if nothing else it was always gonna be stylish/look good/have incredible camerawork (especially the last one - De Palma’s films always have awesome shots).
The Director of Photography (Cinematographer) is Stephen H. Burum, who Brian de Palma (the Director), worked with frequently. He did films like Carlito's Way, Hoffa, The War of the Roses, Casualties of War, The Untouchables, and a bunch of other films. The first Mission Impossible had business looking this good.
When entertainment was full of quality and art. I remember going to the theater in 96 to see this film, I think I went to see this one, Independence Day and Tornado all in July 96.
1:11 Directors, Camerawork, The TEAM! Writers and Actors!
It’s funny, I remember my dad taking me to see the first M:I film when I was about 8 years old. I didn’t remember or care much about the plot obviously but it was the action that really stood out. It’s definitely my favorite in the franchise, although every film afterwards has been pretty solid.
Emmanuelle Béart was breathtakingly beautiful in this movie.
I remember seeing this with a buddy upon release at the Cinerama in downtown Seattle. It was a packed house. Back when people were real human beings and not the humanoids that walk around now. We all knew we were in for something. As the lights go down this dude says, “Lay it on me,” and we all giggle. The train sequence at the end, we could feel the wind in the Chunnel, and as the credits roll we all clap our hands because DePalma and Cruise delivered the goods. One of the last real blockbusters…
I love all the split-diopter shots in this film.
Wow, I wont be watching this movie the same again. Great job!
You have great insights. Keep working hard to achieve your goals.
@CinemaStix
Жыл бұрын
:D Thank you so much for your support!
Great work! Always loved this movie in my youth. Mi:2 missed so much of its charm and I felt sad about that. True blue spy movies are sadly so rare these days
@atwunz
Жыл бұрын
Mission Impossible 2 was just the opposite of Mission Impossible just like how Fast Five to The Fast and the Furious. Mission Impossible 3 tried to be both.
@thomasstudstrup5028
Жыл бұрын
And you probably disliked all the othwer movies as well right?? I bet you hate it every time Tom makes real stunts on real locations and you prefer this movie that looks like it was made for tv. And the fake looking final actionscene on the train.
It's a DePalma joint what did ya expect!
DePalma is an awesome director with a unique visual style.
I watched the video, now I wanna watch the movie. Awesome as always, and I love your use of "when" in titles
@CinemaStix
Жыл бұрын
You should! And thanks :) I’m worried I might be starting a trend within my niche though. Eventually it’s going to lose its novelty I imagine.
The first Mission Impossible movie was incredibly faithful to the TV show and was incredibly well shot. It's easily the best film of the franchise and laid an amazing foundation for Ethan Hunt going forward.
@fs7572
3 ай бұрын
Making Jim Phelps the bad guy is the opposite of faithful to the show, isn it?
@DaffyDuck007
3 ай бұрын
@@fs7572 Making Phelps the villian was disappointing, but it was actually a rare subversion of the audience's expectations that worked. You just knew it was Kittridge until Phelps showed up alive. Minus MI2, all the MI movies have stayed faithful in that Hunt needs a team for the mission, the tropes of the show are still very present, and the execution of the plans are complex and require brilliant cunning and timing. It may not be as realistic and down to earth as the show was, but MI is about as good a spy thriller as you can get for a blockbuster summer action franchise.
Yup, this is what we used to call a “movie”
Such a beautiful film
What gets me about this is that Lucy Ball and Dezi Arnaz STARTED the Mission Impossible series. No mention of DeziLu ANYWHERE after the TV series. But a few decades later Tom Cruise picks up the series, he and Lucy are BOTH from the Western New York region, so it KIND OF went full circle. I also LOVE the series! One other thing, I reviewed the new Mission Impossible movie you can find the review on my channel.
@James-pl2oy
Жыл бұрын
Wow! I knew Lucy was Star Trek: TOS’s patron saint but MI too? Makes me like her even more
One of the major game changers in movie industry . It made James Bond look like a Nickelodeon show lol. The 90s were really innovative
@npcimknot958
Жыл бұрын
I agree. that era they really were innovative . tech wasn't bad and wasn't good they were limited and that limitation made some great stuff.
@shahn78
10 ай бұрын
M.I 1 had at least two qualities that doesn't exist in James Bond's vocabulary: sophistication & poise
The best of the franchise
I've never forgotten a review I read when the movie came out in '96.. "Your mission - Try to follow the plot; Impossible."
Still the best film in the series. Been one of my favorite movies since I was eight!
@DarkoBert-ob6yr
Жыл бұрын
100%
If it wasn't for Mission Impossible 2, this series would be perfect. The first one will always be the best, and the rest all have their own personal touch on the series 👍
@nicke.3011
Жыл бұрын
precisely.
@truthseeker7867
Жыл бұрын
Fallout is better
@steviegbcool
Жыл бұрын
@@truthseeker7867 lol
@steviegbcool
Жыл бұрын
MIssion Impossible 2 was pretty terrible . But the 4.5,6 all look the same. I cant even remember what the plot was in the last 3 movies
@sambafreak13
Жыл бұрын
@@steviegbcool Interesting; that's actually how I feel about 5, 6 and 7. 1, 3 and 4 are easily my favorites and stand out clearly in my mind. These last three with McQuarry at the helm have had amazing set pieces but I can tell you almost nothing about the plot or any meaningful character beats. I know everyone says the series keeps getting better but for me personally when I eventually go back to these all again I think I will stick with 1, 3 and 4.
MI1 has always been my favorite.
Very well put
90s films looked good. They degraded sharply in 2000s. Now it's algorithmic visual trash.
@porcelainpanelpro
3 ай бұрын
“Let’s cgi everytjing to look fake and make the cuts so fast you have no idea what is happening.” “Perfect.”
@cuckoonut1208
21 күн бұрын
I love the look of movies before digital color grading happened in the 2000s.