What topic should I cover next?

@drswag0076

2 жыл бұрын

a series on European history from prehistory to today.

@michaelkopanski3479

2 жыл бұрын

homo sapien migration to the americas

@wnchstrman

2 жыл бұрын

Early European hunter gatherers tools and weaponry deep dive or Indo-European migration into Europe and the spread of farming with corresponding population and cultural changes.

@cameronmetzel2851

2 жыл бұрын

A Video on Australian natives, a dive into the genetic isolation that took place, which also allowed crazy amounts of species to develop and most are found nowhere else.

@jay5467

2 жыл бұрын

the first siberians pls

Damn, as a European, watching this made me feel an even stronger connection to our continent, knowing just how ancient our connection to it is.

@nunceccemortiferiscultu7826

2 жыл бұрын

Watch out, attitudes like that are quickly verging on becoming illegal. They call it "whyte supremacy"

@sahulianhooligan7046

2 жыл бұрын

No love for anatolia or central asian steppes?

@thicclegendfeep4050

2 жыл бұрын

@@sahulianhooligan7046 Yamnaya didn't come from Central Asia, they came from Eastern Europe, around Ukraine and Southern Russia mostly, some did live a bit in Kazakhstan, but only a small amount if I remember correctly. Saying that, they have a lot of ancestry form ANE, who lived in Siberia, but there people were not Asians, but West Eurasians like Europeans and Middle Easterners, who might have originated in either place (my theory is that they descend from Epigravettians who moved east, I could be wrong). Also, the EEF did in fact come from Anatolia, and I do feel a level of love and connection, but my last ancestors who lived in Western Asia are very ancient, they moved to Europe long ago, so I feel less of a connection to Anatolia, I still revere it as an ancestral homeland . But moreso Europe sense that is the whole end point for everyone, and our earliest ancestors there are very fucking ancient.

@gianlucailpostino1380

2 жыл бұрын

@@sahulianhooligan7046No love for anatolian farmers they ruined everything with agriculture. I am from northern Italy so I should have nearly 80% of my dna coming from them but I still do not like them

@jay5467

2 жыл бұрын

europeans are the end result of admixture and replacement and do not have deep (as in paleolithic) roots to Europe. i guess the most archaic genetic component in the gemones of today's europeans would be the Western Hunter Gatherers, but those folks certainly werent apart of the first wave of europeans

That was possibly one of the most reflexive click I've had. Your content is TOP TIER!

@tommybrown7529

2 жыл бұрын

I wouldn’t say all that.. It’s aight 🤷🏿‍♂️

@The_Conqueeftador

2 жыл бұрын

He very slightly injects his politics into some of his videos and dismisses/never mentions a recent finding in human anthropology that makes alot of his past and present videos and messaging false. The finding came out around 2017 and rocked this field of study.(not politically correct to talk about) This video actually is directly related to that finding and he is smearing it/greying the 2017 finding while presenting a weak counter point. All while avoiding mentioning it. To the average viewer you won't get what he is actually presenting because like a snake in the grass he refuses to talk about something that would shake his side of politics in his academic circle and by giving voice to what he is actually trying to counter it will cause people to look it up and realize he is fudging facts. Therefore the majority of viewers will just drool and consume what he is saying.

@johandennefors

2 жыл бұрын

@Narbnod I think that MrRandomName is referring to a single tooth found in Bulgariam 2017 dating 7 million years ago, thus suggesting that hominids originated in Europe, not Africa. A single Graecopithecus tooth. (If so, I'd leave that out as well. This is a fantastic video from North02 again, top tier as always, making me thankful to be alive and able to watch these vids whenever I feel like.) Please @Random Name, correct me if I'm wrong. Many of us would like to know. Nothing wrong with sharing information. But we all like to come to our own conclusions presented with the facts :)

@saradavis6581

2 жыл бұрын

@@The_Conqueeftador why do you also never mention this recent finding? please mention it so i can research it. all this no mentioning has me intrigued haha

@Shovelglove545

2 жыл бұрын

@@saradavis6581 because he’s a nazi and all they can actually do is fear monger/ vaguely allude to some hidden truth that they have rather than provide any real evidence for their presumed ideas

17:25 If you haven't already, could you make a video on agriculture and its affect on health please? That would be interesting

@ethansantiago9031

2 жыл бұрын

I second this request

@suomisongsstirrup7590

2 жыл бұрын

This would be great!

@craptastic4527

2 жыл бұрын

I 4th this request!

@nothingnobody1454

2 жыл бұрын

I dont know if this is a democracy or not but imma vote for this too

@LudosErgoSum

2 жыл бұрын

5th this request.

Your videos are a special treat! The various European migrations are a source of endless fascination. Thank you for sharing your passion with the rest of us!

The Basques R1b Villabruna 1 PROOF

Early human history is endlessly fascinating. Thanks for this.

There's a certain joy I feel when I get a notification for your videos! You're awesome and can't thank you enough for what you do

@collinsoconnor5843

Жыл бұрын

Punguza kimbelembele

Your voice is kind of calming

@ninomiskulin9286

7 ай бұрын

I can’t stand it.

I thought I would add this, that the Homo Erectus found in Georgia (H. georgicus), had a brain size range of between 900-1150 ccs. It's been postulated Homo Erectus had the ability to make fire and simple clothing of hides and fur.

@Golden2962

Жыл бұрын

And art!

Another excellent video. It's wonderful that you back each one up with extraordinary sources. You're doing an amazing job. Best wishes.

I love these videos; I studied anthropology at uni but it was more than ten years ago now, so getting brought up to date with new discoveries and theories is great.

I binged a lot of your videos. But I didn't realize I wasn't subscribed until I saw this video. Now I am. Great videos!

I like they way You support all of your videos with most up-to-date science papers. Keep doing a good job.

Yet another _excellent_ video, North. I love the whole package, from the voice to the writing to the quality of the images and the professional look! You should be working for one of the big history channels, with a paycheck big enough to make you set for life. 🙂 Very well done! ❤️❤️

Your voice for this and other videos was great. The essays upon which your videos are based are also fantastic.

@livrowland171

2 жыл бұрын

It's relaxing but so laid back he kind of sounds a bit stoned

@tavish4699

2 жыл бұрын

@@livrowland171 good for him then right ?

Since everything has already been said about how excellent this channel is, I have to give massive props to the narrator for exemplary understanding and execution of punctuation. I can tell when someone was properly taught how to read. Speaking this perfectly is a very rare gift! 🥰

Absolutely on point throughout. I can only imagine the amount of research that goes into your videos. Awesome work!

Absolutely amazing. Cannot wait for more videos in this series. Absolutely amazing. Fantastic work!

Good job North, another entertaining video. I'm 47 and still learning about things that I find interesting

Thank you! This was once again a great video. I learn so much every time. Love. ❤💞

Another video that did not disappoint, thank you North02!

Your content is top quality and very good at breaking down the dense jargon on academic papers for the layman. You do a better job of covering topics than some of my college professors did.

Another awesome video. Your videos are one of the highlights of my week. Keep up the good work. I hope you feel better and your voice returns soon. God bless you and yours.

Really appreciate your channel. I’m a biologist and a tinkerer, so ancient people tinkering is certainly up my ally. I like your imagery especially the ’old fashioned’ illustrations that convey their prejudice but remind me of my prejudice. We are just mostly guessing and our mistakes will be revealed by future generations. Your approach is reasonable and pretty unique. Kudos and all the best for the future. Also, your videos ALWAYS remind me of my mortality. Besides the topic, it’s something in your voice…‽ Your dives are deep. May it continue forever.

Entertaining, educational, well worth rewatching. Every North 02 video raises human intelligence. We really need this.

@sterno5119

Жыл бұрын

Are you really sure that human intelligence can be raised? I doubt....

@jbaccanalia

Жыл бұрын

@@sterno5119 no not all of it. But I have hope for some. North02 makes science a much more digestible.

“Cro Magnon” is fine as a name IMO, not unlike “Denisovan” and it’s easier for people to understand the distinction or at least specify between them and previous hominid and less advanced human populations compared to calling them different variations on “human”

@tuathadesidhe1530

2 жыл бұрын

Yes it's the same with Neanderthals - who are so named because their bones were found in the Neander Valley.

@davidnotonstinnett

Жыл бұрын

But “Cro Magnon” are just Homo Sapiens….Denisovans and Neanderthal are entirely separate species from Homo Sapiens.

@doomguy9049

Жыл бұрын

@@davidnotonstinnett that doesn't mean anything when they call everything some form of homo sapiens is the whole point lol

@telebubba5527

Жыл бұрын

@@doomguy9049 Denisovans and Neanderthals are not Homo Sapiens Sapiens. "Cro Magnon" is. By giving them a name on that level adds to the confusion. They were more like a different tribe.

@doomguy9049

Жыл бұрын

@@telebubba5527 Cro Magnon is the first fully modern human and is genetically indistinguishable from the people of Europe today which is why the place name makes sense. There are a bunch of primitive or near-human fossils that are identified as variations on "early modern human" or similar because they don't want to accurately categorize human races any further, but those names don't make sense to laymen or anyone really: they're just used for political/religious reasons not scientific ones.

Awesome, was looking forward to watching this :) Thanks North02

I honestly think this is the best documentary on the first Europeans I have found. Please do more and if possible, longer.

Good video. I enjoy your work…keep them coming!

The first Europeans were different species of human

Your videos are always incredibly well done and educational and your voice is calming.

This is a vast subject to cover in one programme, and I truly appreciate the effort you have made in producing this. Chronological graphs, showing te progression of thier development would be of cpnsiderable help to viewers not quite so well-versed in the subject.

Another hit! Tons of great info. Thank you for making these videos 👏 I didn’t know that early Europeans had such a diverse genetic influence. That’s fascinating!

Another banger from our boy North. And have you considered about making a video about Proto-Indo-Europeans?

Your very pleasant voice is soothing, and thank you for not playing annoying background music, just gently taking it all in.

Very good quality content! Thank you so much for sharing your knowledge with us! I'll most definitely be looking out for more of your videos.

Thank you for doing all of the research you did. I thought this vid was a great complement to A Timeline of Stone Age Technology, where you talked about the transition to Neolithic cultures in the Mideast.

Well done. Very concise and to "the point."

This is great content! Excellent graphics and summary of modern human migration into Europe.

You make wonderful videos. I’m looking forward to seeing what you create next.

Hey North, can you do an episode regarding war animals? You covered war dogs before but there are still are animals like the elephants. Apparently, they've been in use for thousands of years.

I don't know about you,North 02 community, but he makes me feel like I am there with these people. The struggle to survive and prosper during prehistory is fascinating to me. Oh for a Tardis!

thank you yet again for a banger as always, mh you feed us well

Good info with good visuals. Thanks for sharing!

I feel so sorry for you having to shift through all garbage in the comments, please keep making more of these - they're so nice to listen to on a morning commute.

@vistuscaine

11 ай бұрын

Yes, so much garbage. This comment included.

Nice video, and i like the mention of sources! It would help me if - when you pronounce the name of these industries, you would show them written down too. Subtitles did not help either :( First bohunitian? Then proto-Aurignacian? Then Aurignacian-"proper"? Then Gravettian? (Later you do write down some culture names as i see)

@radagast6682

2 жыл бұрын

Yes, this would be very helpful.

This was really well done. Great work

I just saw your community post from yesterday about 20 minutes ago, what a superb timing!

Thanks for the references. I was under the impression that pale skin and light eyes came from neanderthals, but now I know different. Decades ago, before the advent of genetic sequencing, I found a monograph in a university library about blood types and ancient migrations in Europe. The author worked with data from blood typing of donors all over Europe and his conclusions IIRC, are consistent with much of what you present here. Neolithic farmers from the middle east outbred or pushed paleolithic hunter gatherers up into the Alps and west to the Pyrenees. The Basques have a really high (>30%) incidence of Rh negative blood, which is uncommon in the rest of Europe (less so in Switzerland) and almost unknown elsewhere in the world. I recall a later influx of farmers from northwestern Asia settling the lands north of the Alps. I don't remember the rest, but I was impressed by what could be inferred from the incidence of a few genes, and how clever the author was to realize how useful this "free" data could be. I wish I could give you a reference, but IIRC, I read it in the early 1980s so it's at least that old.

@Spongebrain97

2 жыл бұрын

I also used to think lighter skin came from Neanderthals but yeah now that seems pretty ridiculous. Change of diet and thousands of years of migrations from different populations spreading more of the genes for light skin in the past 5,000 years is more logical based on studies

@b.a.erlebacher1139

2 жыл бұрын

@@Spongebrain97 It's not a ridiculous idea that it came from Neanderthals. They were in northern Europe for at least 200,000 years longer than H.sapiens, and had all that time to acquire and conserve mutations helpful in that climate. The value of pale skin in a cold cloudy climate with limited strong sunlight exposure is shown by the much shorter timescale (8000 years?) in which it took over in most of the population of northern Europe. You can lose a lot of each generation when vit D deficiency causes a lot of maternal deaths in first childbirth.

@blanketparty5259

Жыл бұрын

@@b.a.erlebacher1139 No it came from. Ancient North Eurasians

@Lee-sd8uo

Жыл бұрын

​@@b.a.erlebacher1139 lmao. if I had a penny everytime I heard that bs. light skin is not a recent adaptation. we've been light skinned for at least 60,000 years.

@l.s68

10 ай бұрын

@@b.a.erlebacher1139it has been established the White mutation are similar but not inheriated from the neanthertal White genes. The evolved seperately so they could perhaps have been inheriated but the are not

Excellent work North02! You probably know evidence is mounting that debunks Out Of Africa, and cutting edge research just published in Hereditas proposes a new Out Of Eurasia model. The paper is titled "The reversal of human phylogeny: Homo left Africa as erectus, came back as sapiens sapiens". The credibility of this new theory needs evaluation and could be ground breaking content...

@nunceccemortiferiscultu7826

2 жыл бұрын

Would you even be allowed to study something like that at a modern university?

@jasonborn867

2 жыл бұрын

@@nunceccemortiferiscultu7826 Absolutely. Most theories, studies and papers are researched and produced by professors at universities and institutes. For example, the paper I cited was authored by a professor at the Department of Clinical Sciences at Lund University, Sweden. I'm not suggesting all modern universities teach an Out of Eurasia model, but the theory is becoming more prevalent based on recent evidence such as presented in the paper. It's an interesting read if you have time.

@gpl992

2 жыл бұрын

@@jasonborn867 If Homo Sapiens migrated back into Africa instead of the other way around,why does Africa have the highest genetic diversity?

@Alfred5555

2 жыл бұрын

​@@nunceccemortiferiscultu7826 No, I'd say you're asking of the question is understanding enough that even just such theories are practically banned from widespread publication. We have known Out of Africa is scientifically nonsense for a long time, only now is it's opposition even seeing the light of day again, and is extremely strangulated with every discovery. Literally in this video the North02 guy talks about these "lies" as if they are facts, such as saying things to the effect of "white people only came into existence about 7000 years ago" and things like this, despite the somewhat famous discovery of a 28,000 year old Cro-Magnon IN SOUTHERN ITALY, who was genetically identical to modern Europeans, (an example of research that is simply ignored and suppressed, I can only imagine because no one realises the political reasons or patterns at play, but people are beginning to take notice like yourself I'm sure). I'm not saying I support the out of Eurasia theory, or any theory on the matter, I'm just saying that the current theory is fictional (there's still the missing link no one seems to mention anymore) and such opposition is obviously banned.

@Alfred5555

2 жыл бұрын

@@jasonborn867 Thor Heyerdahl was denounced by his universities and posthumously removed from his own institution for researching such theories archeologically, let alone biologically, after they became verboten.

I am so in love with your channel dude

Amazing! Thank you for all your gems 🤘🏽😁

I'd recommend "Dawn of Everything" for the rich research on paleolithic and neolithic. It shows just how non-linear our history was.

Great video loved it love all the ancient video dipcations 👍

Brilliant video mate! When you cover the other Upper Paleolithic cultures, please don't forget the "Cresswellian culture" based in the heart of England (Cresswell Crags).

I would do anything to become an anthropologist and be like you making videos for people like me.

Just to be clear, do they have Homo Erectus DNA profiles? Is so, do those profiles show a clear connection to modern human profiles? I've always assumed that they had the profiles and that the profiles showed the connection. However, when I think about the tests showing different levels of Neanderthal in different people, I wondered whether there is some other species that is in the ancestry and isn't Homo Erectus according to DNA.

@Alfred5555

2 жыл бұрын

I'm not sure about the answer to your question, but I believe it is quietly accepted that modern Europeans do not "descend" from Neanderthals at all, but are literally Cro-Magnons who interbred in small amounts with Neanderthals, I am not sure of the common ancestor between Neanderthals and Cro-Magnon.

@VTPSTTU

2 жыл бұрын

@@Alfred5555 That's a pretty tight distinction to make. Even if modern European-descended people have only a small percentage of Neanderthal DNA that resulted from a small part of the Neanderthal population being integrated into the Cro-Magnon population, I would say that these people are at least partially "descended" from Neanderthal. Even if the entire European-descended population doesn't have a measurable amount of Neanderthal DNA, I'd say that the population as a whole is partially descended from that group. I hope that someone will be able to answer whether all of Neanderthal and Cro-Magnon lines came from Homo Erectus or whether some other species might have played a part. Again, I've just always assumed that all of us came from one or maybe a few lines of Home Erectus. The idea of having another contributor would be interesting. I honestly don't know whether they've been able to collect enough Home Erectus DNA to construct the entire genome. If we have something that isn't part of the Homo Erectus genome, that would be very interesting.

Fantastic job good illustrations. North 02 you got it goin on!

I got the notification for this at work and literally demanded my break so I could immediately watch it

Wish this came with a written version x would love to read and study further details. Amazing - Thank you x

@8:30, you discuss melanin/pigmentation. It isn’t accurate to show dark skinned Europeans. In France, even today, some of the natives have olive skin. They don’t look like Africans.

@sahulianhooligan7046

2 жыл бұрын

Due to Yamnaya and Anatolian admixture

@brandondavis7777

2 жыл бұрын

@@sahulianhooligan7046 due to the climate*.

@sahulianhooligan7046

Жыл бұрын

@@brandondavis7777 Yep just look at the photos of Indigenous inhabitants of Tierra del Fuego, Tasmania, New Zealand and Alaska...totally olive skin because of climate lol

@Laura-kl7vi

Жыл бұрын

Didn't you hear the part where he said (it's very well known and they have genetic sequences and know the genes (in all homo sapiens including us today) for skin color so scientists literally can see in these people's genes they can sequence their skin color) until 5-8000 years ago Europeans were dark skinned? They retained their dark skin the entire time period 50K-8K years ago. It's not even a theory because they can see the fact. They know for sure. They test their genes the same way they could test yours or mine.

@Laura-kl7vi

Жыл бұрын

@Graeme Duncan They retained the African skin phenotype from where they came from. Speculating they may have had similar hair isn't shocking. And not all of them did in the photos.

Your voice was not bad and in fact relaxing to listen to. I enjoyed the video, learned quite a lot, and look forward to more. By the way, I'm 73, and when I was young and in graduate school working toward my MFA, there was a major exhibition of "Cave Man Art" at the Metropolitan Museum In NYC. Some of the pieces you show were on display. I was amazed by the quality and lifelike depictions. One in particular was the head of a cane, which depicted a deer or elk jumping, which conformed to the shape of the bone handle. I decided then and there that modern humans did not have much, if anything, on those guys.

Great work, as always.

Basque ancestors

One thing I've never understood in the complexion theory of different groups is the lack of evidence for widespread vitamin D deficiency in the history of groups that are light skinned today. Shouldn't there be a lot of skeletons, when their animal source of vitamin D diminished, that had rickets and other immune issues from vitamin D deficiency?

@EugeneSeidel

2 жыл бұрын

Would that not have been compensated by being outdoors all day long? Sunlight spurs our bodies to manufacture Vitamin D.

@Mj783980

2 жыл бұрын

@@EugeneSeidel The UV index in Europe, regardless of location, is far less than that in Africa. In addition the climate forced less skin exposure, because of clothing protection from weather. So Africans, according to the theory, had more skin exposed in an area of higher UV index, while Europeans had less skin exposed in an area of lower UV index. Regardless of how long they stayed outside the UV in Europe couldn't compete with what they adapted for in Africa

@k9wolf07

2 жыл бұрын

@@Mj783980 You bring up a good point, when he says the adoption of agriculture brought health issues is where you start to see deficiencies but its not on as big of a scale that you would think we should see. However even without the mega fauna much of northern Europe even up to the iron age and round the British islands their diets were mostly consisted of meat "Including organ meats" and dairy with some mushrooms, berries and sea plants so vitamin D deficiency was not an issue they would likely suffer from as its incredibly easy to get from food. I don't think vitamin D was the driver for the evolution for light skin but rather the lack of the environmental pressure of the intense sun no longer playing a huge factor and then sexual selection probably played the bigger role overall. Evolution doesn't always act on positive/beneficial traits, often times aslong as somethings not super detrimental it still passes. Light skin was likely just not detrimental at higher latitudes and either sexual selection or genetic bottlenecking made it more extreme in Europe then in Asia or north America.

@Mj783980

2 жыл бұрын

@@k9wolf07 I agree, i think sexual selection plays more of a role then experts like to admit. Every source i see on the evolution of skin, however, focuses on the folate-vitamin D theory, the balancing act between them. It's offensive, in today's world, to suggest that complexion has any relevance or relation to sexual selection or attraction. The implications wouldn't end well lol

@Breakfast_of_Champions

2 жыл бұрын

@@Mj783980 I think I saw a BBC documentary about that... No really, less pigment to produce means less effort, so nature will gravitate towards that when the pigment doesn't have a useful function and even inhibits vitamin D production during the short summers.

Absolutely fascinating. Thank you

Thank you for another enlightening video. Can you recommend a good book on flint knapping for beginners?

Hail Europa 🌲🧙🏻‍♂️🐻🐺

The out of Africa theory has come under question in light of recent discoveries. Check it out

@PremierCCGuyMMXVI

7 ай бұрын

The same way that recent discoveries have shown Earth is flat, co2 can’t effect global temperature, and earth was created only 6,000 years ago? Perhaps stop taking every conspiracy and pseudoscientific claim you hear and taking it at face value.

Been subbed for a while. Love your videos.

Another excellent video ❤️

Looking at the early Europeans, they remember me the north America natives. In fact there were some proofs that Cro - magnon blood alleles showed correspondence with some group of siberian population and also north west american as well as other groups of tribes. Is possible to hypothesize common migrations from Siberia or however far east Eurasia? Going totally OT I would like if you in future could make a video about the populations of India in particular those that started the fascinating Indus River civilization

@andrewlove3686

2 жыл бұрын

Siberians and native americans are reverse mestizos. The result of ancient east Asians colonizing and mixing with ancient europeans in Siberia. That's the connection. Native America are roughly 30% ancient European and 70% east asian. Modern Siberians are a spectrum from west to east.

@jay5467

2 жыл бұрын

@@andrewlove3686 that seems to be the case with Ancient North Eurasians and their ancestors Ancestral North Siberians, both populations had roughly 30% east eurasian ancestry. and that makes sense if you lookat the phylogenetic tree of haplogroup R and Q, they both come from P (which the ancestral north siberians carried) came from K, which is an east eurasian marker and likely arose somewhere in SE Asia. ANE werent a geneticallly pure west euraian population, they had east eurasian ancestry.

@andrewlove3686

2 жыл бұрын

@@jay5467 haplogroups are not uselful in a lot of cases. Autosomal is what makes people who they are. If I remember correctly Malta boy was like 80/90% west eurasian. The further through time we move the more east eurasian siberia/central asia becomes. Look at the populations that carry ANE admixture. Europeans and eurasian "reverse mestizos". 100% east Asians like Chinese koreans and Japanese are 0% ANE. The only people descended at least partially from ANE are Europeans and people who literal look mixed east asian/euro. Euros have ANE but no east asian.

@jay5467

2 жыл бұрын

@@andrewlove3686 ANEs had 30% ancestry from East Eurasians. thats not alot but it sure isnt a little. also, native americans and some siberian populations like the KEts have ANE too.more so than Europeans

Thanks for the video especially the explanation on the various migrations and assimilations into Europe. Many people just stop at the yamnaya and think they’re the only descendants of indo-europeans.

@blanketparty5259

Жыл бұрын

Technically it is , but more so the corded ware branch which came to dominate europe and beyond. Yamnaya is mostly responsible for Greece.

Thouthourly enjoyed this my friend... Very well narrated and put together. Very informative. First class!

Great video. Istria, Dalmatia, and northeastern Italy seem to be regions with ancient populations. Would love to learn more about that area in particular.

@ninomiskulin9286

7 ай бұрын

Its where I live, its true we had a lot of ancient peoples living here

Show us your flint knapping skills. Show how difficult it is by showing what can go wrong. If you can, show the differences in the knapping techniques of different industries.

@jay5467

2 жыл бұрын

i second this!

skyrim belongs to the nords

incredible work. thank you.

Thank you for providing references!

Was the out of Africa theory seriously challenged or is it still widely accepted

@NORTH02

Жыл бұрын

KZread commenters often seem to belive that out of Africa is “debunked” but it is by far the most dominant theory in regards to human migration.

@user-uu2ur3mh9m

Жыл бұрын

@@NORTH02 if it’s a theory why you present it as a fact when making a documentary about a continent. Not to hate your videos are great but how are apes supposed to mutate into what we are now.. Makes no sense.

@jamisojo

Жыл бұрын

​​@@user-uu2ur3mh9mHow does it not make sense? What part are you struggling to understand? It makes a lot of sense. Although, the correct description is that modern apes and humans have a shared ancestor. If you don't accept that, I don't know what to do with you. This is what scientific research tells us. I certainly haven't heard any better theories.

@escomape5390

Жыл бұрын

You guys are welcome to come up with a theory with evidence and reasoning, also publish a paper about it. Nobody is preventing you from doing it, put up or shut up.

What reasons are there to erase ethnic groups from history? Why do you only have art of Africans as cavemen? Guancha and Berbers had modern European features. Red and blond hair. Not every African is black.

@HailWoden18

Жыл бұрын

A cave painting cannot display race of someone you fking clown.

This was so cool and informational thank You! Pls could you at some point make a video about the prehistory of India and Asia as we know of? I would be so interested!

This is the most honest accurate illustration o have ever seen !! Thank you.

Don't know why but it makes me kind of sad that we are the last of us left.

@istvansipos9940

2 жыл бұрын

considering how effective we are, this was the only good option for us. If we don't outcompete all the humanoids, one species outcompetes us.

@ragnari9368

2 жыл бұрын

You forgot about the X-Men;)

@zephyr-mq3cv

2 жыл бұрын

@@ragnari9368 😂

@DarthKater311

Жыл бұрын

Not me. Can’t wait for us to be extinct

@accidiaet

Жыл бұрын

We will eventually begin new speciations just look at how genetically distinct australian aboriginals are from say the Sami.

09:00 The OCA2 and IRF4 gene also effects skin color. All Mesolithic Europeans, have the light skin variants in these two genes. SNPS rs1804004, rs12913832 in OCA and SNP rs12203592 in IRF4. Due to this, I doubt any Mesolithic Europeans had African-style dark skin. Which is how they are depicted in reconstructions. Africans have the dark skin variant in these genes but Mesolithic Europeans all had the light skin variant. It is true SLC45A2 and SLC24A5 have by far a bigger effect on skin color, but there are a lot of genes involved, and we should not presume ancient Europeans without them had African-style dark skin. Darker than modern Europeans=/=Black. Black

@useodyseeorbitchute9450

2 жыл бұрын

If someone suggest to depicting WHG as indeed dark skinned, for consistency sake I'd insist on presenting them as suffering from serious vitamin D deficit as well. They are being depicted this way to fit modern bizzare ideology.

@sahulianhooligan7046

2 жыл бұрын

@@useodyseeorbitchute9450 No because the their vitamin d rich hunter-gatherer diets. Hence why Alaskan natives and Tasmanian Aboriginals have maintain their melanin.

@useodyseeorbitchute9450

2 жыл бұрын

@@sahulianhooligan7046 Have you actually seen any photo of Alaskan natives? Their skin tone is quite light, comparable to Mediterraneans. That's exactly what I point out.

@sahulianhooligan7046

Жыл бұрын

​@@useodyseeorbitchute9450 Mediterraneans live closer to equator, native Alaskans live further north than Germanics and Mediterraneans and should be paler than both but vitamin D rich diet compensates for lack of UV exposure. You should be comparing Mediterraneans with Tasmanian Aboriginals since both groups are roughly same distance from equator.

@sahulianhooligan7046

Жыл бұрын

@@useodyseeorbitchute9450 You also have to remember modern Europeans are very recent group of people largely descended from Anatolia and Yamnaya steppes

Your voice was fine! Thank you for another interesting video! 😁

Great vids 👍

Today Dr John Campbell, in his presentation on 'genetics and covid deaths', documents how Neanderthal genetics clearly has had an effect on the likelihood of death from covid. He also presents the information that Neanderthal genes are basically unknown in Africa. At 2:56, you say that Neanderthals contribute to almost all human populations. Was that just a slip where you left out Africa or, perhaps you know something about genetics that others don't know? I would love to find out.

@andrewlove3686

2 жыл бұрын

Well that's obviously a measurement problem. Subsaharan africa basically keeps no data on anything. Vs say european where every death "with covid" was labeled as "of covid". Massive difference. Also the fact of the testing scam where they'd ramp up the test cycle to get whatever result they wanted. Not to mention the economic and political pressure aspect of covid along with the doomsday end times cult aspect of covid. Along with trillions of dollars to be made. NO EXCESS DEATHS PERIOD. If covid was never mentioned on the T.V. 2020 would've no different than any other year.

@American_Moon_at_Odysee_com

2 жыл бұрын

I think only that one specific gene. I noticed his chart of the Neanderthal gene is different from other charts showing many Neanderthal genes. I sincerely think that paper to which he refers is only speaking of one Neanderthal gene. A specific one.

Out of Africa has been debunked 🙄 Also Cro Magnon had a much larger skull.

@ehunt7498

Жыл бұрын

Lmao what

@vyhozshu

9 ай бұрын

@@ehunt7498 bro mustve dug out some old N*zi archeological myths from the 30s and thought they were true lol

Interesting perspective. Thank you.

welcome back, Well researched

The Europeans in the comments are mad because they hate on blacks but they literally came from us we’re all humans get over it and cope.

@7inrain

9 ай бұрын

I'm a European and neither am I mad nor do I hate blacks. And I'm completely fine with the fact that all of us humans are of African origin. BTW: If there's someone who can't cope with his origin it usually is what we call a bible thumper - the evolution denying religious fundamentalist from the bible belt in the U. S.

@yoloswaggins7121

7 ай бұрын

We didn't come from "you". Both Europeans and Africans came from those early hunter gatherers.

@rollitupmars

7 ай бұрын

@@yoloswaggins7121 But you did lol

@VictorLdVS

3 ай бұрын

We didn't came from you, we came from an ancestor we both share, and Europeans are mad because they literally represent early Europeans as black Africans instead of tanned Europeans

@kaden88

2 ай бұрын

We didn't come From you if we believe everyone came from Africa than we are the people that came from Africa to Europe but its very complicated to go so far back in history and be so sure most people origin is unknown that far back.

I'm dark Irish (my partner said I could help out with getting the black vote!) but I do think it's been much exaggerated the preponderance of dark skin in late Pleistocene European humans to make a political point, just because you have a gene doesn't mean it's switched on nor do we have a huge amount of evidence for early Northern European. Vitamin D is an absolute necessity for a healthy life and if our ancestors like mine were in the far north where the sun rarely shines then they will be at a serious disadvantage. You've got to wonder why so many people even in northern Africa have light skin. A good example of this political bias is that Neanderthals are always shown with light skin, whilst similar homo sapiens of a similar time are now shown as having dark skin. To note, I'm a Labour party member and my partner is mixed race. But objectivity over politics, all the time

@sahulianhooligan7046

Жыл бұрын

Vitamin D can be obtain through diet without much sunlight hence Tasmanian Aboriginals. "A good example of this political bias is that Neanderthals are always shown with light skin, whilst similar homo sapiens of a similar time are now shown as having dark skin." Neanderthals have lived in Europe for half a million years. Homo Sapiens Sapiens were recent migrators from Africa arriving in Europe 40,000 years ago. "You've got to wonder why so many people even in northern Africa have light skin" Same reason there is light skin in South Africa and Australia = recent migration

Awesome. Your channel is the Best thanks

one of my favorites yet 👍please consider doing a video on homocapensis otherwise know as boscop mam🙏

It can appear that early Europeans are portrayed as brown or black, Not through empirical evidence, but through an ideological push. As with the British “Cheddar Man” whose DNA was sequenced and proclaimed by the British Natural History Museum, as black skinned, Even though the laboratory that carried out the DNA sequencing refuted that there was any evidence of Cheddar Man’s skin tone, either black or white, however in today’s “Diversity and politically correct “ driven academic world, he was reconstructed with black skin in spite of the lack of evidence ?

@spacel3245

Жыл бұрын

I heard many Mordern english are from the mainland of Europe long ago ,like the people who war with King Arthur and occupy England in the tale. There is many population movement in this very long time. Based on the news I read, the owner of the skull have 76% to be a brown to black skinned based on dna test with today technology. His tribe might migrant from middle east. Maybe the owner of the skull is white skinned or other colored. It is not certain. The museum is not putting diversity agenda over honesty.

@HailWoden18

Жыл бұрын

They were dark skinned. Calm down bubba does not mean we are Sib Saharan Afircans or even related as they had yet to even exist when Cheddar Man came over. Stop being a fking baby. He was dark skinned and blue eyed. Not African. Skin tones literally means nothing. We can tell what his tone was via SNPs and gene markers. He was dark, bot African. He had a very common European male Haplogroup and female. His MtDNA is U5b1. I am also U5b1. Most Common in North Europeans and Pre Yamnaya European populations

@HailWoden18

Жыл бұрын

WHG were dark skinned and blue eyed. EHG were light skinned and dark haired.

@boogers69420

Жыл бұрын

most likely everyone was black at one point, we all came out of east africa

@HailWoden18

Жыл бұрын

@@boogers69420 Dont conflate human Origins in Africa with being African. Neanderthals (which everyone but sub saharans Africans have Small DNA of, mostly Europeans and East Asians) and Homo Sapiens left Africa and evolved LONGGGGG before Sub Saharan or North African were even Ethnic groups, languages, and culture. Nothing that could be identified as black African or North African existed. Our ancestors evolved and developed separately. The main ancestral component of all Europeans from North to South is the Yamnaya aka the Indo Europeans, they originated in West Asia, the Pontic Caspian Steppe. We aren't West Asian though. Haplogroups prove so. Again, African did not exist as what it does today when our ancestors spread out. Hominids left Africa 60-90,000 years ago. Not a single ethnic group, modern culture nor language existed. The African Genome would not develop for THOUSANDS more years. Same with everyone. Lmfao. That's the part people tend to leave out or exaggerate.. "Human Origins are in Africa, we must all be African" that's not how it works. Genetics determine that. Not Land. I'm sure as sht not Native American or even American ethnically at all. The earliest humans were black, dark skinned. Not African. Nor are we.

I've been waiting for this one. I've had so many arguments about how Europe was colonized and how it's people changed from there African and Asian ancestors. It's sad that people still can't accept that we evolved over millions of years from an a single cell organism to monkey like mammals to modern day humans. I think that's a more amazing story than any religion could possibly give us.

@vikingirishman1

2 жыл бұрын

They call it the Out of Africa theory for a reason! It's not proven fact! And as science advances we keep learning new things! New discoveries all over the place new hominids discovered all over the place! Who knows what they're going to discover next. They also hide a lot of s*** to from us! Just keep an open mind that's it! I have a feeling our history is more complex than anybody can even imagine!

@buildurtruckurway9118

2 жыл бұрын

@@wildschwein9066 no modern humans 100% came from Africa and there's no questioning that. We interbreed with Neanderthals and denisovens making us slightly different then our African ancestors and giving us a biological advantage in our environment. More robust bones faster healing skin, better ability to absorb vitamin d thru our diets and sunlight ect. Even Neanderthals originated from Africa and Asia just an FYI. Some of the best bs I've ever heard is people claiming white people are descendants of some red skinned people and black people have never changed and that native Americans were delivered by some spirit crow or evolved there completely separate from the other side of the world. I'm not against creationism theory's but it's obvious how it all started. Even in this video he talks about how we came from Africa.

@vikingirishman1

2 жыл бұрын

@@buildurtruckurway9118 lol yes I've heard many of these theories and many that are worse. Some Afrocentric said that white people came from albinos or that we're just Neanderthal mixed cave people ,lol it's disgusting how brainless some people are!

@buildurtruckurway9118

2 жыл бұрын

@@vikingirishman1 I completely agree. I feel that every day we learn more that helps develop this theory into a far broader spectrum and even help with a few others. There's an out of Asia theory aswell that has quite a bit of solid proof but not enough to solidify it. our current accepted theory is the out of Africa theory and it's because it's the only one we have solid facts for so I follow the current facts. I believe it's possible for human like species to have developed all over the planet but modern humans 100% are African descendants and white people and Asians and natives ect are a result of interbreeding with other homo species, cultural and environmental changes our diets ect. I really hope something huge gets discovered and it turns every theory on its head so we can finally learn even More as most of this type of science has been slowed or halted completely in some Fields because the funding just doesn't exist anymore. Hell, maybe it would be one of the factors that help hault racism in the world.

@hellefur6631

2 жыл бұрын

I have allways told my kids, that we are all monkeys/ apes from Afrika. That has given them less urge to judge people on their skincolor.

Despite a little hoarseness which you mentioned, the narration is well-paced and excellent. I learned a lot of vocabulary, and my realization of early European H. sapiens as dark-skinned was strengthened.

My favorite youtube channel !!! Keep Going !!!!!