Now remember... This is the technology they are telling us about. Now imagine the technology they AREN'T telling us about.

@qaisal-weshahi7811

Ай бұрын

Actually, the deeper I went about these technologies, the more I realized they r completely not as explained and have soooo many limitations and issues (That includes all technologies not just aircrafts)

@drawandsmudge

Ай бұрын

Yes, but there is lote of limitations to work it

@topsecret1837

Ай бұрын

Don’t forget. This *was* the technology they weren’t telling us about, fool.

@mianatwood

Ай бұрын

There are anything they not telling us cuz other nations are a part of the program. And all the tech was stolen by China anyways 😂

@smooky12

Ай бұрын

They claimed everything about U2 spy plane before it was brought down by Soviet Union 😄

Even fighter jets are towing stuff. So American.

@niczim123

Ай бұрын

If you look closely you can see the truck nuts hanging off the back of the plane too!

@MaticTheProto

Ай бұрын

Ikr? But I wonder why it’s not needlessly oversized without any benefits to boost the pilots ego

@Fireball-ms1kk

Ай бұрын

Typhoon already had this

@aniket1816

Ай бұрын

​@@MaticTheProto r/fuckcars

@MaticTheProto

Ай бұрын

@@aniket1816 indeed

“Secret weapon” Broadcast to millions on KZread

@bigpoppadarb9940

19 күн бұрын

Eeexactly😂

@petiecoe5294

18 күн бұрын

Yeah, highly secret ha

@Halvingcompletado

18 күн бұрын

Era secreta, ahora hay otra "arma secreta" y así sucesivamente

@jgabb1967

18 күн бұрын

My guess billions

@terrymcgee6558

17 күн бұрын

Story also told by some Russian journalist 😂😂😂

The gape between publicly acknowledged tech and secret tech is about 20 years.

@catalindeluxus8545

9 күн бұрын

Source?

@fareemvenosa3774

9 күн бұрын

I read it was between 40 & 50 years. Night vision (or thermal imaging) was supposedly found in the Roswell crash. Foo fighters (the balls of whatever,,that buzzed allied aircraft), probably Nazi design. I dont know how much of it I believe, i doubt roswell was a ET craft, but communist or nazi craft. The germans were the most intelligent, fantastic engineers, in the world. Hence the race to drag them off to US/Soviet installations, in return for immunity. Injecting blue dye into children's eyes, and the USA/Soviet Union gives you immunity, as long as you build weapons...

@fareemvenosa3774

9 күн бұрын

​@@catalindeluxus8545Google it, ffs. Sourthhhh ?🤤

@jamestruax9716

6 күн бұрын

50

@marvinhunt8276

4 күн бұрын

I'm almost certain there is tech discovered decades ago we will never hear about.

My friend is a Navy helicopter pilot. Hes been in 20 yrs. He told me whatever they show us, they are already FAR beyond it. Amazing.

@Defender78

29 күн бұрын

Puh-leeze Enough with the Area 51 stuff and how the government is holding technology that's years and years ahead only to reveal it at a layer date... you've been watching too much Independence Day

@dougstyles

28 күн бұрын

Yea. The entire world's military probably knew this 10 yrs ago. Still cool to see tho

@ghostrider-be9ek

27 күн бұрын

@@dougstyles 30 years ago they knew it

@RandyBaumery

27 күн бұрын

Bases on the Moon. Gravity drive. Force fields and Phasers. Now, they're going to kill me.

@danieldevito6380

27 күн бұрын

That goes the same for all technology

The f16s had a pod that did this for when they did SEAD.

@sargecharge4081

Ай бұрын

yeah this is pretty much a smaller ALQ-131pod mixed with MALD tech , I wonder what the effect envelope would be

@markphillips4767

Ай бұрын

The ALE-50 towed decoy. It can be mounted on a bunch of aircraft. I would guess this is a next gen version using the computing and sensor power of the F-35.

@amazin7006

Ай бұрын

Its much more effective on a stealth aircraft of course, since the f16 itself would be a big glowing target that would be much harder for the decoy to copy.

@kamakaziozzie3038

Ай бұрын

@@amazin7006of course

@snorttroll4379

Ай бұрын

What is sead

Naval ships have been using this same basic technology against torpedoes for many decades. When I served in the 90s it was called NIXIE.

@nocovanco6179

13 күн бұрын

I don't remember how nixie works though I'm familiar with the degaussing system but ultimately I was a lowly en2. Where my day to day job was used as punishment for deck apes and the AC rates.

@troyqueen9503

12 күн бұрын

Towed array system.

@shag139

12 күн бұрын

Clancy talks about it Nixie in Red Storm Rising.

@TianasFrog973

12 күн бұрын

Maybe it’s updated

@Redfvvg

11 күн бұрын

These magnetic antennas for detecting submarines under water, I know for sure that they were in the 60s in the Russian Navy aero flot

Although important, it's amazing how much they put into our defense budget. I can't get pens at my school

Yeah, don't tell anybody. Remember, it's a secret weapon.

@I___

Ай бұрын

От кого? От Зимбабве?))) ...давно есть противооружие уже.

@sonclearbrahman-ar1461

Ай бұрын

Don't worry, it wasn't mentioned in the film 'Maverick'. Still a secret! 😂

@user-rl8to5nc2q

Ай бұрын

@@I___ No one asked for your opinion Russian

@doge1995

Ай бұрын

It's not secret... It's not new. Half the world has it

@jelmervd2l

Ай бұрын

The secret is in the signals it emits. Things like this have been done for before, the F16 did had had a pod that acted as a decoy when doing seed. There are also cruise missiles that are used as decoys/scramblers. The secret is not in THAT it happens, but in HOW it happens.

A super high-tech version of wiggling your helmet around on a stick to attract fire.

@DustDevilRage

26 күн бұрын

Skootz why does your channel have zero content? I clicked you looking for further entertainment. I was not entertained.

@dustin66896

26 күн бұрын

😂😂

@DustDevilRage

26 күн бұрын

@@dustin66896 Dustin, same thing. Why you got no content? I need entertainment.

@n3lis94

26 күн бұрын

​@@DustDevilRage If you want to see a K'nex roller coaster my channel is not empty. Hope it helps ;)

@springbloom5940

25 күн бұрын

And will work just as well

Military intelligence around the world: we don't know the secret Random guy on KZread: i know

@troyqueen9503

12 күн бұрын

They’re watching,the secret squirrels are out there.

I can't see how my life is improved by knowing this information and it seems that it should have been kept classified.

@bengrogan9710

9 күн бұрын

What have you been told that would in any way help with defeating what the Decoy does? They have been used since the late 80's

@gurjeetsingh-gd1wr

5 күн бұрын

Egg zuktli

A weapon that manages to stay secret in spite of the whole Internet knowing about it. Truly amazing.

@kinnymane8593

27 күн бұрын

despite* 🤣 wtf is inspite

@TheNationaltresure

27 күн бұрын

And the opponents too. :)

@branson2301

27 күн бұрын

@@kinnymane8593 Despite and in spite of are both prepositions meaning “regardless of,” “even though,” or “notwithstanding.” They can be used interchangeably.

@ufoinsider6932

27 күн бұрын

They like to give that impression but remember they didn’t see 911 coming

@user-ll9qk2el4d

27 күн бұрын

The secret is that this "secret" is a decoy.

It's crazy how creative we can be when it comes to war...

@Sentinel_ICBM

Ай бұрын

R&D from US defense projects has led to tons of technology we use today. (Internet, GPS, EpiPens, and so much more)

@Ryan-lk4pu

Ай бұрын

​@@Sentinel_ICBM100%. Came to say the same thing. Also microwave ovens... Although, I'm not sure they're real. I mean - place food inside, mmmmmmmm, ding - wtf??

@Sentinel_ICBM

Ай бұрын

@@Ryan-lk4pu Yes! If I recall there were a number of inventions that also came from NASA's efforts in the 60s. Laptops, digital cameras, scratch resistant coatings, and the epic F-1 (which ironically we no longer know exactly how to make!)

@micsunday14

Ай бұрын

And spending hard earned tax payers dollars. Because let's face it. Only the working and middle class pay taxes these days. Billionaires and corporations don't pay anything like a fair share anymore

@silentblackhole

Ай бұрын

Well, if you some enough money into anything as much as we sync money into wars, then you would expect some cool shit wouldn’t you?

Very nice! As a 24 year Veteran, i say very nice.

That was very clever. What a way to protect an investment

The fact that this tech is declassified EVEN without details means it's decades old tech.

@mcgherkinstudios

25 күн бұрын

It is.

@lamontwallace4323

24 күн бұрын

The F-18C f-16, and the F-111 had this

@connorkraus8216

24 күн бұрын

Yea I was gonna say it seems like they could’ve done this 10 years ago. Pretty simple design with just a fiber optic cable that sends out pulses to “distract” missiles

@JK-zq9vw

24 күн бұрын

The tow decoy system has been around for a long time for sure. Not just in fighters.

@chaschristiansen

24 күн бұрын

Lol, correct. It is called a towed array... Everything from ships and submarines to advanced missiles have them

This tech has been around for decades. US Navy warships use the same concept to evade torpedoes.

@douglashanson7489

28 күн бұрын

I Love the antiquated concept of torpedo nets from a century ago. I seriously think there could be modern applications for it, if someone would bother with it. I don't see why the concept couldn't be expanded to an airborne platform as well, floated by drones, with high-tensile nets that are either high-explosive or discharge electrical current- hitting an incoming missile with our own missile leaves _zero_ margin for error, while deploying high tech nets gives at least _some_ margin. Plus, when our defensive missile misses, it's speeding out of the area, while loitering nets stretched between drones, would still be there, ready for follow-up salvos. I also don't see why we can't design loitering drones with CIWS, so that CIWS doesn't have to be a last-ditch defense.

@gillesguillaumin6603

28 күн бұрын

Canadian method against germans torpedos few hours after the first use.

@ryanmartin4602

27 күн бұрын

The Nixie!

@ryanmartin4602

27 күн бұрын

The CIWS is like 13 tons, requires water and 3 phase 440VAC. You'd need a C130

@johncrafton8319

27 күн бұрын

@@ryanmartin4602 Nixie indeed!

"Finally, if all is lost then ALL IS LOST"

@lgg2304

12 күн бұрын

Lmao! I hate it when people use expressions or a turn of phrase wrong.

@HuntingTarg

11 күн бұрын

"Washington and his generals looked at the situation [in Delaware], they looked at how it could happen, and when they [took stock of their resources] the men didn't have enough shot or powder to even fight. Washington said "all is lost." Then he said, "get me Robert Morris." " -Oliver deMille, "The Four Lost American Ideals"

I was watching something recently about jets & missiles & I never knew that firing one could be so dangerous to the one firing it. It showed countless training videos of the missiles being released & because of the speed of the jet they stay with it & some come right back up into the plane, blowing it up. That's why they show them pulling up & away after firing one. They gotta get the hell away from it.

Reusable flares

@Nightmare-kg7xd

Ай бұрын

*reusable chaff i think

@ALMX5DP

Ай бұрын

@@Nightmare-kg7xdyeah chaff I think would be more accurate as this sounds to be radar based and not infrared based.

@Stella-gm7bo

Ай бұрын

@@Nightmare-kg7xd reusable decoy

@RainKing048

Ай бұрын

Nah FOTDs aren't reusable but there are multiple loads carried from 4-12 decoys depending on the aircraft size

@Stella-gm7bo

Ай бұрын

@@RainKing048 fancy decoy better now?

Last resort, activate the Top gun theme song,,the shedding guitar work should jam any missle

@AC-hj9tv

Ай бұрын

Bro is 💯 0

@mackenzierinier4956

29 күн бұрын

It actually makes the missile do a U turn and hit whatever launched it.

@danieldbeavers

29 күн бұрын

Final countermeasure is the sound of Tom Cruise yelling "BREAK RIGHT!"

@chuglyc

27 күн бұрын

Favorite comment

It can ALSO project a holographic image of itself in any direction to confuse the missile. THATS FKIN WILDDDD

“The F-35’s secret weapon” and it’s just a towed decoy. 😂😂😂

I used to work for Raytheon and they have been selling the decoys for years for use behind F18s. They work very well. When I used to fly we had something entirely different on our big USAF aircraft. Ditto for Air Force One.

@magnusthorssten1662

26 күн бұрын

“They work very well” against cave dwellers in Afghanistan I’m sure they do.

@PsychonauticExplorer

26 күн бұрын

Great! Now I have another curiousity that'll never be satisfied 🙂

@Yourkue

26 күн бұрын

​@@PsychonauticExplorer Wait until you learn about the radar spoofing missiles that can ping back a variety of signatures including multiple war planes until a HARM missile is deployed and takes out their radar entirely.

@tryten9

25 күн бұрын

Yup. The B1B has had this for decades.

@drew7155

25 күн бұрын

Tell us. Give us something a little more. I heard they can shoot a bunch of drones that all have the same signature so no one would ever know which one is the correct one.

Are you telling me this PLANE has a TOWED ARRAY?

@taytheprodigy4388

Ай бұрын

I know, shit was insane first hearing about it

@humblewoodcutter3000

Ай бұрын

yeah it sounds pretty similar.

@cideltacommand7169

Ай бұрын

Conn sonar, torpedo in the air torpedo in the air Sonar? Sir we are in a plan- 500kg of tnt proceeds to destroy the f35

@MiG82au

Ай бұрын

Towed decoys are nothing new. The AN/ALE-50 was deployed in 1995.

@GabrielVitor-kq6uj

Ай бұрын

Nothing new, the lil Gripen per example already had one for decades now

Dude, it's not towed, - it has its own jet engine and flies ahead of the plane! That's the point.

@bengrogan9710

9 күн бұрын

That is a different thing - you are thinking of MALD, where this sort of tech is on a cruise missile

SÓ ESTA APARECENDO A VOZ DA CURA DIVINA E A VOZ MISSIONARIA.

This isn’t a WEAPON IT’S a countermeasure

@yomama629

28 күн бұрын

"secret weapon" is a figure of speech, it just means something you keep up your sleeve as a last resort or as a trump card, it doesn't necessarily refer to a weapon system

This so called invisible plane for recent radar systems is very visible for WWII type radar.

Thanks for telling our enemies about our secret weapons...

Remember that the Wright Brothers first flight was on December 17th 1903. 120 years ago. The rate of technological advancement in aviation is frankly mind boggling.

@angelguia4523

28 күн бұрын

Its alien technology being used to progress ours

@ianmacfarlane1241

28 күн бұрын

@@angelguia4523 Ah yes, those "aliens" who've travelled unimaginable distances to visit us, only to crash when they get here, AND somehow manage to do it in some areas remote enough to cover it the evidence before anyone actually seeds it - those aliens. Given that they can't help crashing into the USA, why don't they ever crash into Times Square, (for instance)?

@scary.boy.zombie5478

28 күн бұрын

Alien tech...🤫

@AussieDubber

28 күн бұрын

120 years is a long long time. That's several lifetimes worth of thinking, testing and creating, multiplied by hundreds of thousands of people. A year is a long time if you focus on something and direct all efforts toward it... a decade... Half a century?

@ianmacfarlane1241

28 күн бұрын

@@AussieDubber There's always one know all...who doesn't know as much as they think they do.

Imagine a swarm of these. The enemy wouldn’t know how many of what. Couldn’t get a lock. Then the signal gets attacked. Then if “all is lost” it takes an L while the actual 35 was a ghost bumblebee that quarterbacked missiles from a naval destroyer 150 miles outside of engagement range. Radar still shows a mixture of 3-50 enemy airships of varying makes and model radar signatures as you eject out of your fighter right before a missile screams in and blows it to smithereens

@ezombeh1269

Ай бұрын

my man, you don't know what a couple of E/G18's with TALDs can do. the F35 can just sit back and shoot as necessary, playing mini spicy AWACs for them.

@ConnorNolan

Ай бұрын

Drone swarms around planes will be the future. It’s going to be like smart, flying armor. Every plane will have a little bubble of drones around it

@dotnox5e

Ай бұрын

yeah the f-35 is actually bonkers, decades ahead of what anyone else will be doing

@charlespk2008

Ай бұрын

Actually, they already have the missile version of this. A heavy bomber could carry a dozen of these decoy/jammers to cover for it.

@bobmartin9918

Ай бұрын

You have just described the MALD. Look it up

We shouldn’t be showing our technology to the enemy we never did before

This technology is at least 10 - 20 years old. That decoy probably now has weapons on it itself to shoot back.

@timfountain98

16 күн бұрын

29 years.... AN/ALE-50 - first flown on F-16 in 1995....

Only if our politics and morals were as good as our weapons

@devilsoffspring5519

23 күн бұрын

It doesn't matter if your weapons are good enough though! MURRICA FUK YA!

@danielhernandez-vo9zc

20 күн бұрын

Engineers make the weapons that’s the difference. You can’t bullshit your way into engineering

@mcmarkmarkson7115

19 күн бұрын

Maybe if you pay them as much as we overpay for the weapons

@mcmarkmarkson7115

19 күн бұрын

@@danielhernandez-vo9zc laughs in Boeing

@mm3501

19 күн бұрын

@@mcmarkmarkson7115 🤣🤣🤣

The secret power of the F35 is that it can blow up entire budgets, without taking off a single runway.

@margiux

27 күн бұрын

😂

@sultryjmac

27 күн бұрын

This. It's not very good.

@jon2922

27 күн бұрын

Ah yes, the old "F-35 expensive" line. Ooh, maybe you can go with "Technology will never beat a skilled pilot", or "the F-35 can't dogfight" next...

@m01mast3r

27 күн бұрын

​@@jon2922Don't forget the good old "It's not stealthy because low frequency radars can detect it!"

@flpmlks5181

27 күн бұрын

@@m01mast3r show me, how this invisible aircraft will operate without very visible airfield? :D i would attack anything where it can land...what then?

Good idea to share this on YT so adversaries know they have to come up with ideas to by pass it.

@bukton10

17 күн бұрын

They already know.

@aarontaylor1484

15 күн бұрын

Or they are prying for more information by posting stupid stuff and other reply to it

@Mr.Robert1

14 күн бұрын

OBVIOUSLY anything on KZread is known. Come on now let's be real. To show how challenged KZreadrs are you got 29 thumbs up 29 people plus you are fucking clueless!

Invisibility cloak, yes, an actual cloaking device. Ask the Klingons.

Imagine they spent this much effort on things to benefit humanity

@oneofmany1087

24 күн бұрын

Like the taxpayers money in ukraine and now israel and illegal people coming in the usa

@jonathanmorris8362

24 күн бұрын

I want you to look up USA spending pie chart. It will blow your mind.

@jonathanmorris8362

24 күн бұрын

Our mass majority of spending IS social welfare. Not Military.

@pseudonym745

23 күн бұрын

Have you heard of Kurt Tucholsky? He was famously quoted by the 'peace movement' in Germany. Surprisingly they forgot of the second half of the quote. I wonder why: "Imagine there is war and nobody joins in" - "then the war will pay a visit to YOUR home". I hope the translation is accurate enough.

@RogueGneral

23 күн бұрын

Imagine they didn't have to because of despotic undemocratic totalitarian nobheads

It is a towed decoy and it is not new at all, the US has used them since 1995.

@MSkallywagg

Ай бұрын

So have the British

@hernerweisenberg7052

Ай бұрын

@@MSkallywagg Yeah I think they started development in '87 and had it on the Tornado since the early 90´s and on the Typhoon from ~'95 or so.

@swiffersweatjet7815

Ай бұрын

It should be mentioned however that the ALE-70 on the F-35 is said to be a generation ahead of the older ALE-55. There’s also the fact that the decoys jamming ability gets a boost purely because it’s connected to an F-35 and can use its jamming array.

@hernerweisenberg7052

Ай бұрын

@@swiffersweatjet7815 Actually, how it works is that whenever it detects an incoming threat, the decoy transformes into a bald eagle that rips the incoming missile apart in its vibranium claws. xD But fun aside, I don't doubt that decoy on the F-35 is pretty advanced stuff, wouldn't surprise me if its a little ahead of the british stuff too. All this thing is missing is a proper long range missile like Meteor or so, and it will be unstoppable :D

@swiffersweatjet7815

Ай бұрын

@@hernerweisenberg7052 yeah, while the AMRAAM is a solid missile it’s starting to get outdated, but there are currently like 6 projects in the U.S. focused on fielding a replacement for the AMRAAM and they are all doing some interesting stuff. These missiles should go into production within the next few years iirc.

Imagine if humanity used its talents and resources for the betterment of our being, rather than its destruction.

They F-35 is so advanced that only 28% of the aircraft are mission capable while the rest is useless. All this at an astronomical cost.

This jet, that was made fun of constantly for all its programming bugginess, has some nuts tech. You can't help but wonder if you can even fight against this.

@ConnerDavids

Ай бұрын

you can’t

@perwestermark8920

Ай бұрын

This isn't the only plane with this technology. And US isn't the only country using these kind of decoys either.

@LRRPFco52

Ай бұрын

@@perwestermark8920 Name me one other fighter with a quad-computing processor bank with the largest threat library in the world, that has a VLO airframe, and towed decoys.

@perwestermark8920

29 күн бұрын

@@LRRPFco52 Do you always invent stupid questions? You tried to align the question based on the "mention any other F35 plane that is better than the F35 plane"? Just so you can claim "but that isn't a F35 plane". Maybe sit down and ask yourself why your ego is so fragile that you need to try to ask biased questions.

@LRRPFco52

29 күн бұрын

@@perwestermark8920 Nothing to do with ego, just countering your claim of other planes with this technology. Keep in mind I’ve been in aerospace and defense since the 1970s specific to fighters and their weapons systems and sensors, so I see a lot of comments from people who have zero experience in this field, but I’m always learning more and wondering what other fighter has the same type of technology as the F-35, especially with regard to these types of countermeasures.

How interesting would it be if somehow the tethered decoy could intercept the original coordinates of the missile launch site and re-direct our enemies missiles against them.

@darylvanderford4307

22 күн бұрын

They probably already do

@antd8667

22 күн бұрын

They program time limit on arming and it does not find a new target in about 12 seconds it self detonates

@DevonSherwood

21 күн бұрын

If air to air the plane that launched is also moving. Unless they had it update live. Also the this reminds me almost exactly of the opening scene of Mission Impossible: Dead Reckoning lol

@ochicore

21 күн бұрын

If you are talking about SAM launch the redirected missile would have long lost its energy before it returned to sender, if that scenario were even possible

Towed decoys are so 1990s, but now we have fiber optic towed decoys.

The F-35 is loaded with many capabilities, but it doesn't perform any of them well. They just added as many "bells & whistles" to raise the pricetag to benefit the M.I.C..

@subtlename2873

13 күн бұрын

Are we talking about the M2 Bradley? Oh... the F35. Yeah, they airplane version of the Bradley.

@koryfutrell2985

13 күн бұрын

@@subtlename2873Yup. Like a Bradley with wings.

@jonothandoeser

12 күн бұрын

Bullshit. It does most of them well.

@theophany1770

12 күн бұрын

I know. Good luck keeping this thing flying for any length of time

@jonothandoeser

12 күн бұрын

@@theophany1770 Ha! Introduced in 2006 it's now 2024! Lol!

Me wondering why they shot an AMRAAM at an F-35

@alexandermaynard5386

Ай бұрын

Is the Ukraine getting armaments for their falcons? 🤣

@pd28cat

Ай бұрын

@@alexandermaynard5386??

@02suraditpengsaeng41

Ай бұрын

Probably friendly fire scenarios And he probably mean partner turn to enemy, how many time outside of Iraq?

@alexandermaynard5386

Ай бұрын

@@02suraditpengsaeng41 yep! Like when the Iranians reverse engineered the aim-54 to build their Fakour 90 kinda situation. There was a time that the tomcats (and armaments) were exported. Was wondering if this would be a similar situation

@LeonAust

Ай бұрын

They got very close, but I know what your alluding to. Easy to close in to a Typhoon because its a huge bloop on the radar screen.

Can you make a video about the insane engineering of the havilland mosquito?

@Nightmare-kg7xd

Ай бұрын

i would love that

@cjwrench07

Ай бұрын

I’m sure there is an older long-form video on it already. Also, *Rex’s Hanger* is another great channel for aviation technology/history videos.

@lokalkakan

Ай бұрын

It was made of wood? It's not insane engineering,

@czarodziejpieczarki

Ай бұрын

@@lokalkakan well Don't you think that making an entire aircraft cable of flying vast distances and carring ordinance Complete the Out of Wood Is Not impressive?

@jamesholden5664

Ай бұрын

There's already one put there.

At 100 million per plane the fact is 29% of the fleet are usable the locker martin as it was said in US parliment is an expensive paper weight

Amazing technology, on paper. Last committee hearing I watched said majority of f-35 don’t even fly

Should have a Return to sender signal Hahaha

@stevecapper9321

27 күн бұрын

😂😂😂

@FC-xc3zy

24 күн бұрын

They do..if the aircraft picks up any enemy radar, the aircraft will send missiles to the exact enemy location. At the end of the day an enemy radar system is a nice way to reveal their location for the aircraft to automatically take out..

That jet, such incredible ingenuity and modern technology. Good to see ❤

@manuelmorri3248

23 күн бұрын

This old technology

Flying at top speed toward the ground or toward a mountain, with the missile close behind, then with full power reach for the sky and watching the missile explode into the mountain, still gives me immense satisfaction. It's very dangerous and not easy, but I must have saved myself 10 times by this method.

Dan Hampton mentioned towed decoys in his book as a wild weasel and they were flying F16s

He fails to mention that the if impact is imminent the decoy detaches as well to open the distance.

Gotta love the Irish accent “the F tirty five ….” 😂😂😂😂

@tonymurray814

24 күн бұрын

Ha. I’m Irish. Watch it!!

@gregn16

23 күн бұрын

I was tinkin' tha same 😂

@mauricetoussaint7283

23 күн бұрын

Don't take the piss pal

Counter-counter-measure: a camera to choose the bigger target.

We should never tell them anything about what it could or can not do. 🙄

It's amazing to me that man can create such fantastic technology, yet most people using the English language still haven't figured out when to (and when not to) use the apostrophe.

@edintrumic3345

Ай бұрын

See most people using the English language are definitely not "creating such fantastic technology"

@Benji1969

Ай бұрын

Hey don’t call me out like that

@pistolgrips

Ай бұрын

Apostrophe? 98% of comments I see posted on the internet are devoid of ‘periods’, commas, capital letters where appropriate, sentence structure in general, spelling…..you name it relative to anything resembling the English language and it isn’t there. Speaking of ‘there’…. misuse of there/their, then/than, it’s/its. I could prolly😉 keep going.

@Aaron-wq3jz

Ай бұрын

@@pistolgripswho cares it’s a comment section not a dissertation

@pistolgrips

Ай бұрын

@@Aaron-wq3jz it’s not that I care. I get a good laugh out of fools like you.

Remember, it's a secret.

@TheBuddel

21 күн бұрын

It's literally not.

When KZread knows "military secrets" you can be 200% sure its NOT a secret...

F35 has the superpower of the price

I got these idea in 2017 when my dream still was to be a pilot of fighter jets, it's amazing to know now that , my idea was among useful innovation 😮

It's just a question of time until drones will make these expensive planes obsolete

@fredflintstone8569

Ай бұрын

Drones with AI are the future.

@swiffersweatjet7815

Ай бұрын

the U.S. is already developing drone wingmen for the F-35, NGAD, and F/A-XX.

@davidaltamirano6828

29 күн бұрын

Just yesterday I saw something somewhere about F16s getting fully turned into drones.

@perfectsplit5515

26 күн бұрын

@@fredflintstone8569”Drones with AI” Were those what those fictional SkyKillers in Terminator were? 😅

*And we have over 1000 x F-35's built already! The USA has a BIG head-start on WW3!!!*

@ChiefManny1

7 күн бұрын

Keep dreaming. Only good for paperweight.

@ChiefManny1

7 күн бұрын

Paperweight. Keep dreaming.

The more I hear from that aircraft the more I am amazed

This would’ve been so nice to have as a countermeasure in Battlefield 4

@RM_VFX

Ай бұрын

The jets already dominated the map in BF4 if you were any good. The only times I ever hit a jet with my launcher was when they were flying too low to deploy flares in time and I timed my shot perfectly, so I stopped carrying it. Even then, they could just eject, hit me with a sniper, and jump right back in. 😂

@beelzeboo

Ай бұрын

@@RM_VFX yes I remember the rendesniping servers. I still loved jet combat in that game and think the more weapons and deployable countermeasures the better. The F-35 can carry 6 missiles, and 2 laser guided bombs among 8 other built in weapon stations in real life

I’m sure many other aircraft in the USAF, whether it’s an F-35, C-17, F-18 or AWACS aircraft, already have this and other counter measures as well.

@lowdrag82

24 күн бұрын

I know for a fact the F-16 uses it.

And when they merge AI with these weapons, it'll know the difference between a decoy and the jet.

If num_aircraft > 1: target = firstAircraft If you're Russia/Iran: don't use the code above

@yeetzabois3582

Ай бұрын

lol

@Zack_Taylor

Ай бұрын

No no if you're a US enemy please do use this code. I promise it's this simple and your system will work.

@SweepAndZone

Ай бұрын

Bro wrote his first hello world yesterday

@keptleroymg6877

Ай бұрын

Comment section iq comment

@CarlosAM1

Ай бұрын

"How did we not think of this before"

One of the most expensive and least effective fighter planes. And the most dangerous, well done.

@cyberdemon1702

22 күн бұрын

Yea no argument here on the absolutely criminal inefficiency getting this thing up to snuff. But the jury is still out on whether it’s ineffective or not. We wouldn’t know that until we were involved in a major conflict. It seems Israel’s F-35s are doing just fine currently. Either way, it is certainly a world class platform. Just how good it really is, if it’s “worth” the cost…time will tell. I’d rather have it than not have it, but that’s a low bar to clear given the circumstances.

@TheBuddel

21 күн бұрын

Bro believes the russian propaganda lmao

@elibnem4126

19 күн бұрын

F-22 > F-35 Should have just stuck with them

@TheBuddel

19 күн бұрын

@@elibnem4126 Hmmm almost like there is a reason... But no, a random in a comment section said so, so it must be true

@cyberdemon1702

19 күн бұрын

@@elibnem4126 they serve different purposes. F-35s are more like generals on the field whereas F-22s are the tip of the spear. I suppose they could have spent a fortune giving the f-22 similar capabilities but I don’t know enough to know if it’s even feasible. Either way I’m a big F-22 fan as well!

Well it’s not secret anymore. That only means one thing….. that the more advanced technology is all ready ready.

@rogerwilco5918

12 күн бұрын

What it does isn't the secret.. how it does it is.

USA : Someone have made a video on our secret wepon

@user-og2xd7mx7p

18 күн бұрын

Who did it??

that is so sick!!! the tech in these jets never ceases to amaze me!!

Lil buddy, they carry 5 of them.

Wanna hear about secret weapons? Marry into a family where like 13 dudes all work for aerospace and weapons development firms with long-standing government contracts and get them drunk on a holiday. 😂

I have a friend who helped to design this. It’s a simple concept, yet genius to design and implement.

@RuiseMuis

25 күн бұрын

Name please?

@Stenn333

25 күн бұрын

The "genius" is in the Manufacturing Engineering staff....I worked Quality on the production floor...I can tell you it's one thing for the "eggheads" 😉 in Design Engineering to come up with something "on paper," but it's an entirely different equation for MFG Eng. to figure out how to build reproducable, dependable hardware in the real world. ❤

@thilde007

24 күн бұрын

⁠​⁠​⁠@@Stenn333 there is nothing genius about designing something without close coordination with mfg

@TheDonwiggins

24 күн бұрын

Most technology is a fairly simple concept really. Radar and guidance systems are really simple concepts. It's a matter of just having the correct materials to make it feasible.

Make sure your wing man’s aware you deployed it!

@LRRPFco52

Ай бұрын

F-35s fly 25-40nm from each other, not in close formation.

Thought it was gonna be a lazer or vaporizer the way the thumbnail looked

“Say hello to my little friend”.

This reminds me of a towed array from a submarine or ship

All I can think about is how cars from the 80's & 90's had this exact technology and we never acknowledged the potential they had in averting potential contact from guided missiles 😍🥰😍

This is provided it can even get off the ground that day.

F-15: Back in my day we didn’t have fancy stealth tech or radar jamming! If you wanted to dodge a missile you had to work for it! 104-0!!

@jamesmaddison4546

27 күн бұрын

According to my father who was an f4 pilot in Vietnam and later on in an f15, did indeed have jammers and been around for decades

@perfectsplit5515

26 күн бұрын

Everybody in AFROTC wanted to be a pilot. Always the coveted dream job.

That line better be tough as fck or strong as steel or else it will snap when the jet goes fast or does tight maneuvers

@LRRPFco52

Ай бұрын

If only the program managers and engineers had thought of that.

@michaelrains64295

29 күн бұрын

Golly, I hope they thought to test that. /s

@LRRPFco52

29 күн бұрын

There are at least 35 years of towed decoy institutional knowledge, flight testing, and operational use in combat. The tethers work just fine.

@gijsbertuslaurensvandevooren

26 күн бұрын

​@@michaelrains64295it's fiber glas

That's what I'm talking about 😜 being in control

Next level AA missiles with cameras and IRST.

Im gonna say that F-35 is such a beautiful and incredible creation of technology but imagine that Rafale also got this (SPECTRA system) and has been created long before.

@swiffersweatjet7815

Ай бұрын

Are you suggesting that the Rafale got towed decoys first? Maybe compared to the F-35 considering the SPECTRA system had its first flight before the F-35 reached IOC, but decoys could’ve been in its design before then, but the U.S. has had towed decoys for decades, the F-18E/F and B-1 have had them since 1995.

@youwenleborgne2991

Ай бұрын

@@swiffersweatjet7815 The SPECTRA system is considered superior to traditional towed decoys for several reasons: 1. **Adaptability:** SPECTRA is a comprehensive electronic warfare suite that includes radar warning, laser warning, missile warning, and jamming capabilities. It can adapt its responses to various threats in real-time, offering greater flexibility compared to static towed decoys. 2. **Stealth:** Unlike towed decoys, which can be visually detected and targeted by adversaries, SPECTRA operates passively, making it harder for enemies to detect and neutralize. 3. **Integrated Defense:** SPECTRA is seamlessly integrated into the Rafale's avionics and can work in conjunction with other onboard systems, enhancing overall defensive capabilities. 4. **Dynamic Response:** SPECTRA can rapidly analyze threats and deploy countermeasures, providing a dynamic defense that can react to evolving battlefield conditions. 5. **Reduced Vulnerability:** Towed decoys are physical objects that can be damaged or destroyed, leaving the aircraft vulnerable. SPECTRA's electronic nature makes it less susceptible to damage. Overall, SPECTRA offers a more comprehensive and adaptive defense against modern threats compared to traditional towed decoys.

@youwenleborgne2991

Ай бұрын

I don't wanna write 😴

@youwenleborgne2991

Ай бұрын

@@swiffersweatjet7815 The SPECTRA system is considered superior to traditional towed decoys for several reasons: 1. **Adaptability:** SPECTRA is a comprehensive electronic warfare suite that includes radar warning, laser warning, missile warning, and jamming capabilities. It can adapt its responses to various threats in real-time, offering greater flexibility compared to static towed decoys. 2. **Stealth:** Unlike towed decoys, which can be visually detected and targeted by adversaries, SPECTRA operates passively, making it harder for enemies to detect and neutralize. 3. **Integrated Defense:** SPECTRA is seamlessly integrated into the Rafale's avionics and can work in conjunction with other onboard systems, enhancing overall defensive capabilities. 4. **Dynamic Response:** SPECTRA can rapidly analyze threats and deploy countermeasures, providing a dynamic defense that can react to evolving battlefield conditions. 5. **Reduced Vulnerability:** Towed decoys are physical objects that can be damaged or destroyed, leaving the aircraft vulnerable. SPECTRA's electronic nature makes it less susceptible to damage. Overall, SPECTRA offers a more comprehensive and adaptive defense against modern threats compared to traditional towed decoys.

@youwenleborgne2991

Ай бұрын

​@@swiffersweatjet7815The SPECTRA system is considered superior to traditional towed decoys for several reasons: 1. **Adaptability:** SPECTRA is a comprehensive electronic warfare suite that includes radar warning, laser warning, missile warning, and jamming capabilities. It can adapt its responses to various threats in real-time, offering greater flexibility compared to static towed decoys. 2. **Stealth:** Unlike towed decoys, which can be visually detected and targeted by adversaries, SPECTRA operates passively, making it harder for enemies to detect and neutralize. 3. **Integrated Defense:** SPECTRA is seamlessly integrated into the Rafale's avionics and can work in conjunction with other onboard systems, enhancing overall defensive capabilities. 4. **Dynamic Response:** SPECTRA can rapidly analyze threats and deploy countermeasures, providing a dynamic defense that can react to evolving battlefield conditions. 5. **Reduced Vulnerability:** Towed decoys are physical objects that can be damaged or destroyed, leaving the aircraft vulnerable. SPECTRA's electronic nature makes it less susceptible to damage. Overall, SPECTRA offers a more comprehensive and adaptive defense against modern threats compared to traditional towed decoys.

The Russian jet fighter engineer watching this: "Hmm, da, da... Is good to know, blyat"

@Scudboy17

Ай бұрын

It's the kind of countermeasure that's hard to beat even if you know it exists. Most air to air missiles have independent targeting, meaning once they are launched they rely on (mostly) their own sensors to find the target. You would have to invest some serious money and time into making the missiles much smarter and totally change the way they can find and attack targets. It's like knowing your enemy has near perfect camouflage. Just knowing they have it still doesn't tell you where they are hiding. Some air to air missiles are wire or radio guided by the pilot or a weapons officer in the plane. Most of these are really old- 60's and 70's era tech- and have limited range and effectiveness. Either the missile is too short-range to hit targets from a safe range, the missile is too fast to guide once it reaches terminal range, or it's too slow and easy to avoid. Most militaries stopped using them decades ago, tho I think Russia still uses some.

@LeonAust

Ай бұрын

Yep and by the time they build one the US will be another 15 years ahead in technology.

@wildhogOW

Ай бұрын

@@Scudboy17 Russian jet fighter: "Hmm, da, da, I shoot transponder, problem go away"

@AC-hj9tv

Ай бұрын

Russian jet fighter engineer: Vodka poisoning

@LRRPFco52

Ай бұрын

@@Scudboy17 Wire-guided AAMs? Now I’ve heard it all. It’s like the basement-dweller comments are getting worse. I thought with information access, people would get smarter, but I was wrong.

What Ive never understood is why they still haven’t put missiles facing behind so it can attack from behind

I wonder why they haven't developed a version of this for buildings where you could steer the missile into a parking lot.

Thanks for letting the enemy know that.

@TheBuddel

21 күн бұрын

This isn't a secret. Do you really think this is the first time this was ever published?

@Clutch8185

20 күн бұрын

Exactly, why would we publish our informatics & weapons systems capabilities?!? It’s no less frustrating whenever the resident @1600 Pennsylvania Ave goes on a trip…albeit somewhere on American 🇺🇸 soil or overseas. ABC, CNN, FoxNews, NBC, MSNBC: “On this day, at this time, Joe & Jill Biden will be in such a such city. My vote was stolen in ‘20…but Joe is still recognized as the Leader of Free World so let’s not announce to those who have issues w/🇺🇸 location of our sleeper……..I mean leader!

@danielhernandez-vo9zc

20 күн бұрын

You know copying technologies isn’t easy right? First you need a decent size population of engineers and scientists that can mimic different parts of the project and years to successfully simulate the project

The F-35 also apparently has the capabilities to hijack control over the missile and force guide it away from the aircraft, I might be wrong though and it can only direct friendly missiles

@DustDevilRage

26 күн бұрын

I watched your War Thunder Tank Battle. You went out in a blaze of glory.

@Broimsatan

23 күн бұрын

Every time I cook up a chicken pot pie in my microwave I think of all the technology that surrounds my pot pie...

@DustDevilRage

23 күн бұрын

@@Broimsatan Chicken pot pie is F’n Grrrrrrreat!

This sounds much more ominous when the narrator has an Irish accent 😊

Welp there goes that secret 😂

@aberba

Ай бұрын

You don't think other countries know more than this KZreadr with their intelligence?

@s.l.2409

Ай бұрын

@@aberba it was a joke 🙄

@drksideofthewal

Ай бұрын

@@s.l.2409 Not a very good joke

This is short so I’ll excuse it mentioning it of course. The emitter can also mimic other aircraft as it jams radar. It can give not only the missile a false target but multiple false targets thus lowering the hit probability significantly. All F-35 carry four of these. While the F-35 does have flares, it does not carry chaff dispensers.

@MaxAbramson3

20 күн бұрын

... and calls for an A-10 for back up.

@jscanoy

18 күн бұрын

​@@MaxAbramson3 More like as bait

@albertvicioso5532

17 күн бұрын

Gracias

Man the millions of us that have witnessed this secret weapon are so privileged and blessed.

Imagine if all these resources were spent on making our daily lives better.

The tech we don't know about would blow your mind....