The Experiment that Disproved Reality

Ғылым және технология

========================================
MATERIALS:
Magnet Wire: amzn.to/423cBXm
MOSFETS: amzn.to/3mZW3iY
Potentiometer: amzn.to/3yVJPup
Hi Power 50 OHM Resistor: amzn.to/40rw42e
Capacitors: amzn.to/42lVekK
Wire Kit: amzn.to/3z0lAew
DC Power Supply: amzn.to/3YZ4jx6
========================================
High quality & advanced pcb (Rogers, HDI, rigid-flex and aluminum PCB ) : www.pcbway.com/ (Again, a really big thanks to these guys for sponsoring the video 😁, they have been great to work with)
Andrew Dotson - bit.ly/2KUR7b5 (Check him out! :)
Information for the Video:
Bell's Paper: bit.ly/2YrrPUW
My Paper for the Experiment: keystonesciencewebsite.weebly...
Minuet Physics/3BlueOneBrown Video: bit.ly/2Xl4WBd
Join the discord discussion! : / discord
Refrigerator Vacuum Pump: goo.gl/pvV5Gb
Arc Glove: goo.gl/vDMskG
High Voltage Supply: goo.gl/eg6C9s
Follow me on Twitter! / keyst0nescience
@Keyst0neScience
Support me on Patreon to fund better experiments: / keystonescience
The pen I use was donated by: hobblecreekcraftsman.com
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Inquires: Sequence01123581321@gmail.com
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
music:
Broke for free, Night owl ;
Enthalpy, Rolemusic
Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 3.0
•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Facebook : / keystonescie. . ( I never get on facebook though )

Пікірлер: 755

  • @NotSoCrazyNinja
    @NotSoCrazyNinja5 жыл бұрын

    If a tree falls in the woods and there is nobody to witness it, it does not make a sound, due to power-saving functions of the simulation. If the area is not being used by players (humans), the area does not exist except in a very toned down manner for power-saving reasons. One a player gets close enough, the area is loaded and whatever changes should have happened during the time it was unloaded get performed so it is up to date.

  • @FirstLast-kv1iq

    @FirstLast-kv1iq

    5 жыл бұрын

    UNIVERSE is a Simulation confirmed

  • @bobedwards8896

    @bobedwards8896

    5 жыл бұрын

    I hope your just making a reference and dont believe that to be the case. wether or not someone is there to "hear" it dosnt effect what the area does, ie the EXACT same thing as if some1 was there

  • @NotSoCrazyNinja

    @NotSoCrazyNinja

    5 жыл бұрын

    @@bobedwards8896 I think you missed the point of my comment lol

  • @kolinevans9127

    @kolinevans9127

    5 жыл бұрын

    Hmmmm ‘human music’ I like it !

  • @chuckphilpot7756

    @chuckphilpot7756

    5 жыл бұрын

    If a tree falls in the woods and nobody is around, it 100% absolutely does not make a sound, because sound is a human construct. What it would most likely do is make a channeled energy beam of a certain frequency 😉

  • @Scott_C
    @Scott_C5 жыл бұрын

    Probably one of the most mind bending, and mentally stimulating bathroom sessions I've ever had.

  • @dandur7124

    @dandur7124

    4 жыл бұрын

    When you said "bathroom", I felt that.

  • @RafaelTopgunStudios

    @RafaelTopgunStudios

    2 жыл бұрын

    I’m currently taking a shit too. Knowledge in, shit out.

  • @PlasmaChannel
    @PlasmaChannel5 жыл бұрын

    Hey keystone, glad to see a new posting. Interesting stuff!

  • @SystemsPlanet

    @SystemsPlanet

    5 жыл бұрын

    Thank you for your extraordinary effort at planning, procuring, setting up, performing the experiment, capturing, analyzing, videotaping, speaking, editing, uploading, etc. I commend your effort. The enormous amount of time and effort shows. I have an Engineering degree and have taken years of Physics and Calculus. But, I have the impression that most of science is not using the "Scientific Method". The Scientific Method fails on its very premise that a fallable scientist can control for all variables to isolate just one dependent variable before an experiment counts as "Scientific". For example, in your experiment, how do we know if - the dust in the air was causing the light to deflect? - cosmic particles were striking the cables in your measuring device? - the Brownian Motion of air particles has an impact, or - miniscule temperature variations? How do we know if aliens on Alpha Century moving around in their flying saucers changes the results? We can't know for sure. What am I missing?

  • @AndrewDotsonvideos
    @AndrewDotsonvideos5 жыл бұрын

    I've been purposefully avoiding this topic because it's so hard to explain, but you nailed it! Thanks for the shoutout, means a lot! Maybe I'll try some experimental stuffs one day.

  • @FirstLast-kv1iq

    @FirstLast-kv1iq

    5 жыл бұрын

    Yay!!!! my comment worked.

  • @AndrewDotsonvideos

    @AndrewDotsonvideos

    5 жыл бұрын

    @@FirstLast-kv1iq ;)

  • @zoltankurti

    @zoltankurti

    5 жыл бұрын

    In theory, theory and experiment are equvivalent. But experiments show that this equality is violated.

  • @AG-pm3tc

    @AG-pm3tc

    5 жыл бұрын

    We all saw your "theoretical physicist vs the wild" video, we know your attitude towards experimental stuff ;)

  • @non-inertialobserver946

    @non-inertialobserver946

    5 жыл бұрын

    "Maybe I'll try experimental stuffs one day" Hahahaha nice joke

  • @BlueprintScience
    @BlueprintScience5 жыл бұрын

    I remember sitting in a dank classroom being lectured Bell's Theorem. This, like other experiments with light, remind us that classical and quantum mechanics are not unified. It's an exciting time to be a physicist!

  • @LargeTurn1p

    @LargeTurn1p

    5 жыл бұрын

    I wish I had even one classroom that I would consider "dank"

  • @grantaum9677

    @grantaum9677

    5 жыл бұрын

    I like Nassim Haramein's work as well as the 11d universe. Electric universe is bit too speculative

  • @wesjohnson6833

    @wesjohnson6833

    4 жыл бұрын

    Not going to be unified either. Classical mechanics has failed miserably.

  • @4.0.4
    @4.0.45 жыл бұрын

    I understood everything and nothing at the same time. Is this what Quantum™ science is about?

  • @gabe8168

    @gabe8168

    5 жыл бұрын

    Quantum is a word, why did you put a tm next to it?

  • @JohnStormForge

    @JohnStormForge

    5 жыл бұрын

    Once you realize you understand quantum mechanics you realize you understand nothing.

  • @codejunki567

    @codejunki567

    5 жыл бұрын

    @@gabe8168 Who™ cares™

  • @codejunki567

    @codejunki567

    5 жыл бұрын

    @@gabe8168 Thanks for your input anyway Gabe (not really)

  • @Morrigi192

    @Morrigi192

    5 жыл бұрын

    "I think I can safely say that nobody understands quantum mechanics" - Richard Feynmann

  • @KeystoneScience
    @KeystoneScience5 жыл бұрын

    hey guys! I know it has been a while, I'll try to get some more out soon, but I have been working on something really big (not for a video, but as an experiment/invention) and I have been getting promising results for my first few tests, so I am really excited about it! (if you are curious, it deals with protons ;)

  • @FirstLast-kv1iq

    @FirstLast-kv1iq

    5 жыл бұрын

    Of course we're curious!!! Please tell us more if you can

  • @salabs4222

    @salabs4222

    5 жыл бұрын

    Dude me 2

  • @salabs4222

    @salabs4222

    5 жыл бұрын

    I'll give u my #

  • @zootednative

    @zootednative

    5 жыл бұрын

    Einsteins THEORIES are just mental gymnastics to throw you off. Magnetism is not what we have been taught. Look up Ken wheeler's magnetism videos on youtube and buy a ferrocell and see for yourself!

  • @asparagusmelontoast

    @asparagusmelontoast

    5 жыл бұрын

    I read somewhere that light is a governing force and that photons are calibrated locally, but I'm really not sure what that means

  • @OldGamerNoob
    @OldGamerNoob5 жыл бұрын

    Personal partial epiphany on the rotating polarization situation while watching this (no real educated mathematical base for this, just concept that came into my mind): If the polarization is caused by electrons only being able to vibrate along one axis, maybe they not only just let through photons polarized at a right angle to that axis but when they encounter a photon polarization that is at some angle neither perpendicular nor parallel and photons are quantized, and must be either fully absorbed or not at all, the electrons essentially absorb the parallel component vector of their polarization and re-emit a brand new photon polarized according to the remaining perpendicular component of that photon (or accumulated sum of multiple such photons since quanta are always whole numbers) That new photon is then free to interact with the next filter in a non-parallel, non-perpendicular manner.

  • @johnnycash4034

    @johnnycash4034

    3 жыл бұрын

    Could you repeat that?

  • @OldGamerNoob

    @OldGamerNoob

    3 жыл бұрын

    ???

  • @marketmakerstreet

    @marketmakerstreet

    5 ай бұрын

    so you mean photon has an intelligent knowing the degree of a slit?

  • @brandonmack111
    @brandonmack1115 жыл бұрын

    "Printed PCB of your circuit" "PCB board" Yep, managed to get all 3 in there in only two sentences ;)

  • @icyuranus404

    @icyuranus404

    5 жыл бұрын

    yep, i came here to say the same thing except to say that he is an idiot. get one of those printed PCB circuit boards printed up on a board with your own circuit on a peeseebee

  • @rokronroff

    @rokronroff

    5 жыл бұрын

    @@icyuranus404 Yeah, clearly he's an idiot, doing that dumb science shit. Truly, what a moron.

  • @theLuigiFan0007Productions

    @theLuigiFan0007Productions

    5 жыл бұрын

    Yeah it ruined the video for me. I couldn't stop thinking of how dumb that was the entire time, it sounds extremely stupid and unprofessional. Either call it a printed circuit board or a PCB. For the advertisement, I would have said "professionally manufactured PCB of your circuit" or something similar.

  • @icyuranus404

    @icyuranus404

    5 жыл бұрын

    @@rokronroff yep a few french fries short of a happy meal working at the redundant department of the redundancy department of redundancy

  • @X4Alpha4X
    @X4Alpha4X5 жыл бұрын

    I still dont understand how everyone talking about this just glosses over the idea that the light going through the filter gets changed as it goes through the filter. I mean that idea PERFECTLY explains what's happening here. he said in the video and it is measurable that all light passing through a polarizing filter is now oriented at the same angle as the filter. We can't prove** that the filter changed the light, but we see that all light on the other side is oriented with the filter. so this would easily be explained by the fact that light within a certain margin of the angle of the polarizing filter would get 'redirected' to match the filter and this would perfectly explain what's why light can pass through the three filters and make a 90 degree turn but not 2 filters to make a 90 degree turn. I mean referencing the 3bl1br video, they say that light at angle 0 when passing through a 22.5 degree filter, 15% gets blocked and 85% is let through, so now we can measure that all light passing through that filter is now polarized at a 22.5degree offset from the initial reference. So it only makes sense that the next filter would behave exactly the same as the first, but with a new reference, thus leading 60% of the total light remaining and at 45 degrees offset from the initial beam reference. Even using entangled photons doesn't disprove this idea because you are only sending the photons through a single filter. thus the % let through matches as if it was only one filter. You need to run this test again but have the entangled light pass through 2 filters. So that PhotonA would pass through filters 0 and 45; or 0 and 90 and photon B pass through filters 0 and 45; or 0 and 90 independently. IF there was some spooky action at a distance, then you would expect if PhotonA passed through filter 0 and 45 and PhotonB passed through filter 0 and 90 then you should expect to see PhotonB to pass through filters 0 and 90 25% of the time. But i would bet money that PhotonB would pass through at the % perfection of the filter, since after all i doubt any filter is 100% perfect, so lets assume a filter of 99.999%perfection, you would see PhotonB show up 0.00001% of the time.

  • @MaulikParmar210

    @MaulikParmar210

    5 жыл бұрын

    Exactly, sometimes basics are lost in very complex thought process. Also not to mention entanglement is quantum phenomenon while light acts as field with filter. Explain that first why you should assume photons vs waves in first place, you don't want to put your legs in two buckets at once while mesuring two differrnt systems trying to explain molecular and field behaviour altogether and compare the results. Both form has it's own properties and set of rules in their respective form.

  • @brekisolo2378
    @brekisolo23785 жыл бұрын

    The craziest part of reality is how subjective it is. We have hardly scratched the outer echelons of this plane of existence.

  • @ixenroh
    @ixenroh5 жыл бұрын

    Thank you KZread Algorithm for finally promoting small cool channels!

  • @mentuemhet

    @mentuemhet

    5 жыл бұрын

    he ain't small.

  • @fourtwozero

    @fourtwozero

    5 жыл бұрын

    206,000 subscribers isn't small..

  • @Innomen

    @Innomen

    5 жыл бұрын

    206k subscribers, and corporate support.... "small" O.o

  • @ixenroh

    @ixenroh

    5 жыл бұрын

    @@fourtwozero When I made that comment it was MUCH smaller. I swear. Guess the promotion tactic works. Plus he's still small compared to some major biggons out there

  • @jkg6211
    @jkg62115 жыл бұрын

    Did you edit the video to make it seem like you don't need to breathe, or do you exchange gas through your skin? Gills maybe?

  • @abhishekgourav6144

    @abhishekgourav6144

    5 жыл бұрын

    Cutaneous respiratory system a next big leap into human evolution

  • @CakeDragon924

    @CakeDragon924

    5 жыл бұрын

    Yuh, dude is moving so quick. Just started the vid and have to keep pausing to see all the cool stuff.

  • @orlock20

    @orlock20

    5 жыл бұрын

    Skilled singers can sing and breath in through their nose at the same time. Maybe he has such a skill.

  • @evildrmainstream...6767
    @evildrmainstream...67675 жыл бұрын

    Nice to see mini cody's lab is uploading again 😅

  • @luongmaihunggia

    @luongmaihunggia

    5 жыл бұрын

    "Mini cody's lab"

  • @RelianceIndustriesLtd

    @RelianceIndustriesLtd

    5 жыл бұрын

    cody appeals to kids and normies who can't digest complicated concepts

  • @Mp57navy

    @Mp57navy

    5 жыл бұрын

    @@RelianceIndustriesLtd Oh look here, it's Mr. Iamverysmart.

  • @lazar2175

    @lazar2175

    5 жыл бұрын

    @@rauankaldybaev4770 Cody is a geologist, and he is very good at chemistry. This dude is good at physics. Everyone is different.

  • @4.0.4
    @4.0.45 жыл бұрын

    I really like your style, your content and your personality. I'm glad you're uploading again and getting sponsorships to keep doing what you do.

  • @DracaNova
    @DracaNova5 жыл бұрын

    Could the photomultiplier be somehow skewing test results when it changes the photon(s) into an electrical signal?

  • @trulyinfamous
    @trulyinfamous5 жыл бұрын

    It seems that wherever I check on a channel that i haven't watched in a long time and see they haven't posted in a while, they post a video in a few days! That's happened twice this week. Great content as always.

  • @jacktheninja
    @jacktheninja5 жыл бұрын

    No explosions? *oh wait this is keystone science and not electroboom*-

  • @mitesh8utube

    @mitesh8utube

    3 жыл бұрын

    There aren't any explosions on electroboom either, if you don't confuse sparks with explosions.

  • @redfishervictoria
    @redfishervictoria5 жыл бұрын

    Close very close, as there is one major element missing in this interesting problem. Rotation. Not only does energy have compression and rarification as taught as waves, alternating dielectric and magnetic fields, it inherently also rotates. The rotation through the substrate causes an interesting result. The light shifts slightly in rotation and is therefor slightly different in rotational angle than before it entered. The middle polarizer does the same which results in the light further shifting which is seen as light passing through the last polarizer. All energy inherently rotates and this is known as the Lamar frequency.

  • @cheyennereynoso4116
    @cheyennereynoso41165 жыл бұрын

    You just earned yourself a new subscriber! 😄 Great video!

  • @thewingedpotato6463
    @thewingedpotato64635 жыл бұрын

    I like how there's a completely serious 10 minute build up then it jumps to an experiment where you're shooting lasers at a device that looks like a pair of those googly-eyed-glasses with the big -nose, wearing a second pair of goggles for safety. Glad to see you back and making videos again :)

  • @inventorbrothers7053
    @inventorbrothers7053 Жыл бұрын

    Wow you put a lot of work into this video! Thanks, this was awesome to see!

  • @JDStirlingGames
    @JDStirlingGames5 жыл бұрын

    A Photon checks into a hotel. The Clerk asks if it needs help with its luggage. The Photon says, “No thanks, I’m traveling light.”

  • @MrMcyeet
    @MrMcyeet5 жыл бұрын

    Me: "Im pretty smart" This Dood: SCIENCE! Me: 0_o wut

  • @theRhinsRanger
    @theRhinsRanger5 жыл бұрын

    Can you do the double slit experiment on the Halve photons?

  • @scottytherambler6919
    @scottytherambler69195 жыл бұрын

    could PCB way create a pcb that would act as a hub for wiring on a dirt bike that makes engine plug, battery, voltage reg, and discharge control signal output a simple interface? or is this a question better posed to them?

  • @skepticalexicon3534
    @skepticalexicon35345 жыл бұрын

    Imagine your eyes could detect all particals, waves and all other spacial phenomenon like gravity instead of just photons.

  • @skepticalexicon3534

    @skepticalexicon3534

    5 жыл бұрын

    @Immortal Bentron I wouldn't have thought it would even be a useful traight to be honest just spit balling.

  • @dmach314159
    @dmach3141595 жыл бұрын

    Glad to see another post. Getting over my head, but got most of it. Don't stop. Works as an excellent filter. Wouldn't getting unexpected results on such an experiment imply that there are local hidden variables that we are as yet unaware?

  • @georgeindestructible
    @georgeindestructible5 жыл бұрын

    From my understanding, there were never hidden variables anyway, it's just instantaneous energy redistribution in space happening and the reason why it's instantaneous is that otherwise, the universe would probably collapse if it didn't correct the energy mismatch. You can notice the same exact pattern/mechanism in atoms with electrons that jump between energy levels, they do it too instantaneously, again for the same reason, energy balance due to the 1st law of thermodynamics(and if that is true, then the universe is closed system too). The very exact mechanism at its core? That's a bit tougher to figure out.

  • @20ola02
    @20ola025 жыл бұрын

    Nice to get a upload from you again! How is the fusor reactor you and cody is working on going?

  • @dannydts1501
    @dannydts15015 жыл бұрын

    I'm still trying to figure out if you are 18 or 45

  • @shivKumar-of7rl

    @shivKumar-of7rl

    5 жыл бұрын

    He was time travelling btw the video many times

  • @auspiciouscloud8786

    @auspiciouscloud8786

    5 жыл бұрын

    Both and neither ;)

  • @SoulDelSol

    @SoulDelSol

    5 жыл бұрын

    12

  • @auspiciouscloud8786

    @auspiciouscloud8786

    5 жыл бұрын

    Dan 12 was my favorite year.

  • @mannyquinn9031

    @mannyquinn9031

    4 жыл бұрын

    Like quantum superposition :)

  • @Skumfucc
    @Skumfucc5 жыл бұрын

    Thank you for providing the links in the description. Very useful resource!

  • @andchip.s
    @andchip.s5 жыл бұрын

    Well scientists have yet to prove the biggest question know to human kind which is: *How my wallet is always empty and my rubbish bin is always full?*

  • @capnbilll2913

    @capnbilll2913

    5 жыл бұрын

    I'm sensing a connection.

  • @danklyf4202

    @danklyf4202

    5 жыл бұрын

    Your wallet is always empty BECAUSE your trash bin is always full. 😉

  • @andchip.s

    @andchip.s

    5 жыл бұрын

    @James Mines If a rabbits foot is meant to be lucky, whats a whole rabbit worth? Vegus hear I come woohooo!!

  • @andchip.s

    @andchip.s

    5 жыл бұрын

    @James Mines To late, now I owe money to some guy called Big Bob, and he is collection in the morning. Martini?

  • @andchip.s

    @andchip.s

    5 жыл бұрын

    @James Mines James, I just had a call from Big Bob and he is coming over with his "Business partners" Mr Martillo and Mr Pala, I have a felling he is going to break my knees and bury me in the desert. I'm in Highballs sound great!

  • @mbk0mbk
    @mbk0mbk5 жыл бұрын

    I really liked the practical instruments used and the whatever available instruments you got, very cool.

  • @jeffvader811
    @jeffvader8115 жыл бұрын

    I'm starting my A-Level physics course in a few months, couldn't be more excited!

  • @jeffvader811

    @jeffvader811

    5 жыл бұрын

    @basil fawlty Fair enough, it's not everyone's cup of tea. Then again, you must be somewhat interested to watch this video?

  • @BBQDad463
    @BBQDad4638 ай бұрын

    Thank you for this video. I wish that I had watched it before the Bourbon kicked in. I will have to watch it again. Subscribed.

  • @Skhillz_FN
    @Skhillz_FN5 жыл бұрын

    Dude i don't how long it takes to get your videos up Extremely descriptive just the way i like it Most importantly your linking papers in the description

  • @thepoeet
    @thepoeet5 жыл бұрын

    can you please link where i can buy your white board markers please!!!! omg i used to have the same one that i used in my old Trig class! lol

  • @mickyr171
    @mickyr1715 жыл бұрын

    Thanks, i really needed that headache lol

  • @dangitsandy1745
    @dangitsandy17455 жыл бұрын

    Your videos are perfect for home experimenting and I plan on building some of your projects!!

  • @andreimarin6586
    @andreimarin65865 жыл бұрын

    It looks less like a rig to measure photons, and more like you built a time machine :)

  • @TheQooDude
    @TheQooDude5 жыл бұрын

    I got confused at the 6.00min mark. Just before this, you explained the polarizing filters filter out all but one polarity. Now, those same filters rotated at 45deg suddenly let proportional polarized light thru. I am failing to build my understanding because this foundational concept is left unclear for me. Which is it: all or proportional - can anyone clarify please?

  • @timetraveler_0
    @timetraveler_05 жыл бұрын

    Polarizer only blocks light, right? Then how did the middle polarizer at 6:10 let those 45 degrees light to pass through when there were none of those present to begin with?

  • @dharvell
    @dharvell5 жыл бұрын

    I have heard of this experiment, extensively, but this is the first time I have actually seen it explained. Even in its abbreviated state, the explanation of what to look for and the processes involved was incredibly done. Great job on this!

  • @dingleberries360

    @dingleberries360

    5 жыл бұрын

    Yea right. He proved nothing and showed a middle school Lazer experiment. If you can't explain something using real life scenarios then what is the point of trti f to explain it at all. Reality isn't theory.

  • @dharvell

    @dharvell

    5 жыл бұрын

    @@dingleberries360 I think you have a little research in theoretical sciences to do. Reality, theoretically speaking, is only as real as our perception of it

  • @Arbotm
    @Arbotm5 жыл бұрын

    Could you use the sun as a source? Could you assign a musical value to each observable photon and listen to the bit stream live?

  • @reginaldhorkyiiregorreggie1559
    @reginaldhorkyiiregorreggie15593 жыл бұрын

    how dose a wave pocket laser work? so that 45 degree polarization. is that due to the photon drag effect?

  • @justinleewhite7945
    @justinleewhite79455 жыл бұрын

    Y...E..A.H "I think I've got all that". 🤔

  • @pinkichahal3185
    @pinkichahal31854 ай бұрын

    Can you please tell me which lens are you using to focus on BBO crystal?

  • @loganbuser8636
    @loganbuser86365 жыл бұрын

    Is there any way that the middle filter is actually re orienting the light

  • @Draakdarkmaster6
    @Draakdarkmaster65 жыл бұрын

    this was a really cool and informative video, cant wait to see future content

  • @simont3686
    @simont36865 жыл бұрын

    Thank you for a new video! Instantly clicked. Sadly your videos get fewer and fewer. I am always looking forward to your videos.

  • @kinghoffbeers4221
    @kinghoffbeers42215 жыл бұрын

    Your so smart and good at getting the information across. Keep making awesome videos!! 😁👍👍

  • @DavidAllen_0
    @DavidAllen_05 жыл бұрын

    Nothing moves faster than light. So could this potentially validate superdeterminism?

  • @MikaelLindberg

    @MikaelLindberg

    5 жыл бұрын

    The expansion of space, move faster than light!

  • @hemanth561
    @hemanth5615 жыл бұрын

    Hey i am a student and what is the best course like electrical and electronics engineering,electrical and communication engineering or electrical engineering plzz reply

  • @cosmicglory6768
    @cosmicglory67685 жыл бұрын

    @Keystone Science do you think that quantum mechanics allows there to be another world outside of this plane of reality? as in do you think there is life after death?

  • @ace1122tw
    @ace1122tw5 жыл бұрын

    So this is where quarternion numbera come into play. Figuring out the vectors that you were talking about in the first half. Interesting that I would learn about those yesterday and then come across this video to really understand what you were talking about.

  • @innertubez
    @innertubez5 жыл бұрын

    Doesn’t entanglement depend on an initial connection between two particles? Seems to me that makes the action local, not at a distance.

  • @noahmonfrinineedhands1714
    @noahmonfrinineedhands17145 жыл бұрын

    Question...am i seeing electrons like shockly described it because its real easy to see if you have a blacklight flashlight...point on white wall and boom they go nuts

  • @unqualifiedkaotix
    @unqualifiedkaotix Жыл бұрын

    You're relevant! I just took a while to get myself together, but you are relevant. We have so much to teach people!

  • @ImNotACatLawyerButIPlayOneOnTV
    @ImNotACatLawyerButIPlayOneOnTV5 жыл бұрын

    9:40 "Now with the general understanding out of the way.." Me: Yeah.. understanding.. haha..ha..ha.. *I UNDERSTOOD NOTHING*

  • @coyzee1
    @coyzee15 жыл бұрын

    What are the brown horizontal lines that scroll throughout your video ?

  • @spacetruckin6555
    @spacetruckin65555 жыл бұрын

    This video showed up in my feed along side my usual gun, motorcycle, and female MMA fight videos. I watched the whole video, beginning to end, and understood ZERO of what you were trying to explain. I'll just take your word for it. So, reality isn't as we perceive it, or just light? Someone give me the "Barney The Dinosaur" version of it please. Your enthusiasm is obviously authentic, and appreciated.

  • @Gerry926
    @Gerry9265 жыл бұрын

    How did you go from describing light as a byproduct of electromagnetism, as a waveform pulse... to a "photon" which implies a particle? Seems like light might be the result of an electromagnetic expression.

  • @FirstLast-kv1iq
    @FirstLast-kv1iq5 жыл бұрын

    How goes College? good to see you back

  • @brians5724
    @brians57245 жыл бұрын

    Link to where the advertising ends and titled content start?

  • @galvanizeddreamer2051
    @galvanizeddreamer20515 жыл бұрын

    Question: Does light retain the momentum of the object it is emitted from? This may account for some things as the Earth is in motion relative to a absolute universal center. I am aware this phenomenon appears in the likes of Redshift/Blueshift, but I am curious as to if it is applicable to the "c" in and of itself. Something else, is if it is not applicable to c, one could determine the stated motion relative to universal center. I could have also just completely misunderstood your experiment and results, in which I would like to hear how so that I may better my listening skills. Regardless, good stuff.

  • @secretagent5658
    @secretagent56585 жыл бұрын

    Can you do an experiment to proove that quantum entanglement of magnetic particles can be destroyed through High Voltage. I carried out an experiment and I found out that that form of energy was destroyed. But that is impossible as matter can not be destroyed not created. Please help me understand this please?

  • @gabeisatool
    @gabeisatool5 жыл бұрын

    Thank you!!! This is an awesome way to demonstrate such a complicated/ non-intuitive idea.

  • @dweedum731
    @dweedum7317 күн бұрын

    The assumption of entanglement before the experiment even began...itself is a hidden variable

  • @aljenembtry7781
    @aljenembtry77812 жыл бұрын

    What would happen if you used a 12 face horoscope horoscope to make make a certain wavelength wavelength with the lights and discard everything you don't want and the things you do want you have coming out into a little chamber where you got little nano particles that are coated with some kind of metal inside of some kind of gas. Do you think you could efficiently make some kind of plasma????

  • @aljenembtry7781

    @aljenembtry7781

    2 жыл бұрын

    And maybe have the coded nanoparticles a attracted to that beam that you are making positively charged too them???

  • @xtraPom
    @xtraPom5 жыл бұрын

    What if quantum entangled particles adhere to realism by using time as a usable dimension? For instance, a particle that is entangled can talk to its source or partner backwards in time. Wouldn't this keep speed of light's limit and locality constant? This could also be a good description for the double slit delayed choice experiment.

  • @haikiri2011
    @haikiri20115 жыл бұрын

    Everytime someone talks about entanglement I think: isn't it just because light has no time? Even if for us we can count time and interact with light in different moments, for the light existence is only one moment. So if we interact with a photon now and change one of it's characteristics, we are essentially changing it's entire existence, which can seem like it's in the past but it's not. A way to make sure is to split the photon in 2 and then take one and split again. Check if all 3 still seem entangled. If so, we could set a yes or no switch and activate it with a split electron and take it away and flip it on and off with 0 lag by interfering with the other half of the electron.

  • @hercules71185
    @hercules71185 Жыл бұрын

    If your into is correct and accurate to how your channel is. You earned a subscriber from that first 30 seconds. I never really subscribe to channels but anyone who can demonstrate experiments for me to learn. I'm on it!

  • @llerradish
    @llerradish5 жыл бұрын

    Reminds me of camera lens filters if you put two of them together it reduces the light by a lot but if you put three of them together let's do more like, I know it depends on their polarization. Seems kind of weird that when you see it.

  • @Zman2024
    @Zman20245 жыл бұрын

    Keystone Science: *posts video (Everyone Liked That)

  • @MysteryD
    @MysteryD5 жыл бұрын

    "PCB board" Oh, those are cool, like PIN numbers and RAM memory, or CD discs.

  • @SurrogateActivities

    @SurrogateActivities

    5 жыл бұрын

    Or ATM machines

  • @savag3salad813
    @savag3salad8135 жыл бұрын

    You will never understand just how much I need that painting of Albert Einstein in my life

  • @sakib7094
    @sakib70945 жыл бұрын

    This guy should be up there with backyard science, king of random and etc

  • @friedmule5403
    @friedmule54035 жыл бұрын

    Great video! Here may be a thought for you. :-) According to Einstein, photons do travel at the speed of light and time plus distance stops at the speed of light. That means that from a photons point of view no time is gone from its creation til its death and it hasen't moved. So according to a photon, it exists simultaneously on every spot, the whole way, at the same time. Also every split, bounce and so on is the photon at different states at same time the same place. In other word, a photon do exist everywhere in every state the entire time.

  • @sideswipe147

    @sideswipe147

    5 жыл бұрын

    Fried Mule That certainly is an interesting theory and I might like to see that tested. It certainly might explain a lot. Though after a moments thought I doubt it is the case because then to me it seems a laser pulsed on then off again would display to infinity minus the attenuation from it's magnitude over distance instantaineously ignoring the speed of light entirely.

  • @friedmule5403

    @friedmule5403

    5 жыл бұрын

    @@sideswipe147 Thanks for your great reply! :-) My comment was not clear enough but it was all from the photons point of view. On the other hand, Einstein did say that both point of views is equal and true. I think that the photon "experience" everything instantly, if spacetime is zero at light speed. :-)

  • @brianmcquain3384
    @brianmcquain33845 жыл бұрын

    A fun thought to ponder is conceptual quality of movement, say if you move in a dream your not actually moving, but the concept retains itself as such as movement.

  • @johnniewalker6236
    @johnniewalker62365 жыл бұрын

    U have changed so much u are grown now :) nice video

  • @Solizeus
    @Solizeus5 жыл бұрын

    Here is a question for you, if nothing can interact with a particle, does this particle exists? Now, lets have a particle that does exist (you can detect) and make it kind of invisible so that no other thing can interact with it or we just can't detect, does it still exist?

  • @Boysonfromthe319
    @Boysonfromthe3195 жыл бұрын

    Brain overload....lol but a really cool and interesting video! Keep up the good work!!

  • @esra_erimez
    @esra_erimez5 жыл бұрын

    Would you please do a video on graphene chemical vapor deposition?

  • @laser69beam
    @laser69beam5 жыл бұрын

    Are those rulers at 0:54 a copy from @AvE ..? ;)

  • @Just_D.I.Y.

    @Just_D.I.Y.

    5 жыл бұрын

    This was what I was wondering too.

  • @inspireonex
    @inspireonex5 жыл бұрын

    Me: scrolling YT for whatever Also Me: slams on brakes when sees a New Keysone Science vid

  • @orionmyers9546
    @orionmyers95465 жыл бұрын

    CRT part 2 still coming?

  • @GarviHere
    @GarviHere5 жыл бұрын

    It's it same as double slit experiment?

  • @alenfocic4930
    @alenfocic49305 жыл бұрын

    Great video! Really interesting topic.

  • @Docbell60
    @Docbell605 жыл бұрын

    Always love some work of a fellow Bell.

  • @karthikeyanm.v8381
    @karthikeyanm.v83815 жыл бұрын

    What if polarizer shifts the light to different angle .that makes everything look simple and complete

  • @saddoggy2440
    @saddoggy24405 жыл бұрын

    Thank you for the new video.

  • @TieXiongJi
    @TieXiongJi5 жыл бұрын

    What happens when you place 360 filters in series all rotated by 1 degree from the previous?

  • @KeystoneScience

    @KeystoneScience

    5 жыл бұрын

    Near all the light would go through, as you approach an infinite amount, with infinitely small angle changes between them for all 360 degrees, it approaches 100% transmittance

  • @johngray3494

    @johngray3494

    4 жыл бұрын

    Can you prove this with 5 filters?

  • @rick9021090210
    @rick90210902105 жыл бұрын

    the universe and the moon is there and working because there is an observer outside us little humans that makes everything exist... science tries to work around it but eventually it will get to the conclusion that he exists. cheers!

  • @godlover9096

    @godlover9096

    5 жыл бұрын

    It is insane how they try to get around this. Currently the only answers they have are based on speculations that can not be tested (and thus can not even be called science.) Currently we are at a point where you have to chose what you have faith in. The unprovable speculations of man or the necessity of a creator.

  • @grantaum9677

    @grantaum9677

    5 жыл бұрын

    Science: give us one free miracle and we'll explain the rest -Terence Mckenna

  • @grantaum9677

    @grantaum9677

    5 жыл бұрын

    @ we need better words for this 👍

  • @TheGoldenWildcat

    @TheGoldenWildcat

    5 жыл бұрын

    @ Nor God is a she!

  • @mastervel7210

    @mastervel7210

    5 жыл бұрын

    DΣҒIΠIΠG & GΩD ( ΔS IΠ GΩD IS ΩR IS ΠΩT ______ GΣΠDΣR ) ΩΠLΨ SΣRVΣS TΩ HIGHLIGHT THΣ ҒUTILITΨ ΩҒ UΠDΣRSTΔΠDIΠG ΩR CΩΠVΣRSΣLΨ THΔT THΣ SUβJΣCT IS IΠҒΔCT IΠVΔLID.

  • @mattandmegandiercks8809
    @mattandmegandiercks88095 жыл бұрын

    Dude I understood what you were talking about you should be paid well for your efforts

  • @infinitesolarforall3901
    @infinitesolarforall39015 жыл бұрын

    Or..... Ken wheeler is right and light is not photonic, but complex perturbations true a medium, ever considered that? (not claiming that i fully understand this)

  • @OLR1337

    @OLR1337

    5 жыл бұрын

    from what i understand, all quanta are perturbations in their fields/mediums. a photon is what we call such a perturbation. i dont have a degree so i cant say anything with certainty. ill look up ken wheeler

  • @sashas3362

    @sashas3362

    5 жыл бұрын

    EM radiation is an electrical current akin to a "displacement current" observed while charging a capacitor.

  • @KyleBoise
    @KyleBoise5 жыл бұрын

    Seriously love the oldschool video game music!

  • @KalijahAnderson
    @KalijahAnderson5 жыл бұрын

    Is there any proof that entangled particles upon observation actually collapse a wave function? Seems that just because you don't know what state two particles are in doesn't mean that information is traveling faster than light when you measure one. It would seem more probable that the particles attained the information when they got entangled and the information is just there when you measured it. Just wondering if there is any proof to the contrary such as changing one particle and the other one changing at the same time. As far as I know if you modify one part of an entangled pair nothing happens to the other one, you just destroy the entanglement.

  • @jbenkidu
    @jbenkidu5 жыл бұрын

    Excellent video, well done.

  • @mastormind1
    @mastormind15 жыл бұрын

    The Variable may be in 3d physics, as in the wave function is essentially in all directions and particle may just be bouncing and spiraling thru... Just a thought TY love the vids

  • @hansjorgkunde3772

    @hansjorgkunde3772

    5 жыл бұрын

    If particles even exist and its not all energy waves. Chasing shadows ...

Келесі