Ron Wyatt has the complete exploration risking his life.

@rickenterkin4720

4 жыл бұрын

Can't wait to meet Mr Ron Wyatt. He has amazing finds & videos.

@Michael-pn5lp

10 ай бұрын

Thinking logically: Three days travel to the Red Sea crossing 15th,16th,17th Abib. 18th Abib weekly Sabbath taken out of the Egyptian pit through the Red Sea and celebrating on the opposite shore. 19th, 20th, 21st and arriving during 22nd Abib at the bitter waters of Marah. Note the 3 day - 4th day pattern ! The three day distance they travelled before the crossing, should be three quarters of the four day distance they travelled after the crossing to get to Marah. This should help eliminate incorrect proposed Red Sea crossing points. The north end of the Gulf of Suez is still the most likely crossing point - possibly in the area that is now dried up, since the Gulf of Suez is proven to have extended much further north in antiquity. i.e. travelling 9 days distance in three days to get to the crossing, and then travelling 4 days distance in 4 days to Marah after the crossing, doesn't make sense. The same applies to other proposed crossing sites ! On the first day of the 15th they left soon after midnight and travelled to Succoth, giving a maximum of 18 hours travel. They must have rested overnight after 18 hours travel. The second afternoon they "encamped" in Etham. After turning away from leaving Egypt, the third afternoon they got to Pihahiroth where the crossing took place. The Straits of Tiran are about 500 kilometers from Rameses - it just can't be done ! It's about 400km to the top of the Gulf of Aqaba, which is just as unlikely a three day journey for a multitude of men, women and children with herds of livestock. So the whole Gulf of Aqaba is ruled out, leaving only the top of the Gulf of Suez as the likely site - probably the dry bed of the sea that is proven to have extended further north in antiquity...

no matter how much evidence you show them,they wont believe not even God Himself comes down and slaps their faces!

@eeeddddddiiieee

4 жыл бұрын

Jonathan H. Lol so funny I’ve been saying myself lately.

@naija395

4 жыл бұрын

Exactly

@hisprincesswarrior6246

4 жыл бұрын

Our God is not going to force anyone to love Him. Bad choice! Betcha will be some believing peeps once the tribulation starts. 🕊️🌤️🌾💛

@rickenterkin4720

4 жыл бұрын

@@hisprincesswarrior6246 you sure right. I don't think we're that far away from the rapture and tribulation. Wild times we are in. Definitely the days of Noah. See ya in GLORY! Come by & visit!

@vasanthakumarsornakanthy1262

4 жыл бұрын

Amen amen amen well said.

It's Ron Wyatt who first showed it to the world. Anyone who makes documentary like this should recognize and acknowledge that it is based on his work.

@rickenterkin4720

4 жыл бұрын

Totally agree. This guy's work is way overlooked or claimed by others. Mr Ron is the 1st to try & bring it mainstream.

@Michael-pn5lp

10 ай бұрын

Thinking logically: Three days travel to the Red Sea crossing 15th,16th,17th Abib. 18th Abib weekly Sabbath taken out of the Egyptian pit through the Red Sea and celebrating on the opposite shore. 19th, 20th, 21st and arriving during 22nd Abib at the bitter waters of Marah. Note the 3 day - 4th day pattern ! The three day distance they travelled before the crossing, should be three quarters of the four day distance they travelled after the crossing to get to Marah. This should help eliminate incorrect proposed Red Sea crossing points. The north end of the Gulf of Suez is still the most likely crossing point - possibly in the area that is now dried up, since the Gulf of Suez is proven to have extended much further north in antiquity. i.e. travelling 9 days distance in three days to get to the crossing, and then travelling 4 days distance in 4 days to Marah after the crossing, doesn't make sense. The same applies to other proposed crossing sites ! On the first day of the 15th they left soon after midnight and travelled to Succoth, giving a maximum of 18 hours travel. They must have rested overnight after 18 hours travel. The second afternoon they "encamped" in Etham. After turning away from leaving Egypt, the third afternoon they got to Pihahiroth where the crossing took place. The Straits of Tiran are about 500 kilometers from Rameses - it just can't be done ! It's about 400km to the top of the Gulf of Aqaba, which is just as unlikely a three day journey for a multitude of men, women and children with herds of livestock. So the whole Gulf of Aqaba is ruled out, leaving only the top of the Gulf of Suez as the likely site - probably the dry bed of the sea that is proven to have extended further north in antiquity...

Way back during the 90’s, From Tabouk to Duba, my team found this mountain after 3 days of road trip. During our search, we accidentally found a wooden sign ‘Jabal Al Lawz’ pointing to the dirt road but we dont know how to get there. While resting on one of the ‘Bedouins’ tent, A group of expats working on a highly classified military project in the adjoining mountain help us locate ‘Jabal Al Mousa’ or ‘Jabel Al Lawz’. They said the cave of Elijah was also there. Even the Bedouins call it the mountain of moses because Moses was highly revered as their prophet. On top of the mountain the expats that helped us sneak in by telling the Saudi military that we are his ‘aku’ or brother for a visit. He’s an Engineer & said that in the mountain they’re building military bunkers. This place I believe is the true mount Sinai with all the evidence as shown on this video.

@Michael-pn5lp

10 ай бұрын

Thinking logically: Three days travel to the Red Sea crossing 15th,16th,17th Abib. 18th Abib weekly Sabbath taken out of the Egyptian pit through the Red Sea and celebrating on the opposite shore. 19th, 20th, 21st and arriving during 22nd Abib at the bitter waters of Marah. Note the 3 day - 4th day pattern ! The three day distance they travelled before the crossing, should be three quarters of the four day distance they travelled after the crossing to get to Marah. This should help eliminate incorrect proposed Red Sea crossing points. The north end of the Gulf of Suez is still the most likely crossing point - possibly in the area that is now dried up, since the Gulf of Suez is proven to have extended much further north in antiquity. i.e. travelling 9 days distance in three days to get to the crossing, and then travelling 4 days distance in 4 days to Marah after the crossing, doesn't make sense. The same applies to other proposed crossing sites ! On the first day of the 15th they left soon after midnight and travelled to Succoth, giving a maximum of 18 hours travel. They must have rested overnight after 18 hours travel. The second afternoon they "encamped" in Etham. After turning away from leaving Egypt, the third afternoon they got to Pihahiroth where the crossing took place. The Straits of Tiran are about 500 kilometers from Rameses - it just can't be done ! It's about 400km to the top of the Gulf of Aqaba, which is just as unlikely a three day journey for a multitude of men, women and children with herds of livestock. So the whole Gulf of Aqaba is ruled out, leaving only the top of the Gulf of Suez as the likely site - probably the dry bed of the sea that is proven to have extended further north in antiquity...

So cool praise Jesus

@timothya.olmeda7299

4 жыл бұрын

Nicholas Rourke Why do you as a Christian praise anyone but God alone? Isaiah 42:8 'I am the Lord, that is My name; And My glory I will not give to another, nor My praise to carved images.' Isaiah 48:9-11 'For My names sake I will defer My anger, and for My praise I will restrain it from you, so that I do not cut you off. Behold, I have refined you, but not as silver; I have tested you in the furnace of affliction. For My own sake, for My own sake, I will do it; For how should My name be profaned? And I will not give My glory to another.' Deuteronomy 5:7 'You shall have no other gods before Me.' Deuteronomy 5:8 'You shall not make for yourself a carved image- any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the sea; you shall not bow down to them nor serve them. For I, the Lord your God, am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children to the third and fourth generations of those who hate Me, but showing mercy to thousands, to those who love Me and keep My commandments.' Psalm 86:8 "Among the gods there is none like you, O Lord; Nor are there any works like Your works." Psalm 89:16-18 "In Your name they rejoice all day long, and in Your righteousness they are exalted. For You are the glory of their strength, and in your favor our horn is exalted. For our shield belongs to the Lord, and our king to the Holy ONE of Israel." Isaiah 45:15-17 "Truly You are God, who hide Yourself, O God of Israel, the Savior! They shall be ashamed and also disgraced, all of them; They shall go in confusion together, who are makers of idols. But Israel shall be saved by the Lord with an everlasting salvation; You shall not be ashamed or disgraced forever and ever." As a Christian, don't you see what you are doing? It is shameful that all you can do is give praise and glory to another, without even realizing what you are doing. Isaiah 37:20 "Now therefore, O Lord our God, save us from His hand, that all the kingdoms of the earth may know that You are the Lord, YOU ALONE." Return to God all you ends of the earth! Shalom

May the ALMIGHTY LORD GOD protects us all .....Amen. ;)

@Dave_The_Beatmaker

4 жыл бұрын

Grüße aus dem Ruhrpott 😎

@American-BadAss732

11 ай бұрын

May the Almighty God erase this plague of Judaism from the Earth

ron wyatt's work 🙌

@rumpestillskin4671

4 жыл бұрын

Wyatt's a dishonest con man.

@rumpestillskin4671

4 жыл бұрын

@Musaaud Al-hawaly BS

@markcondren2617

4 жыл бұрын

@@rumpestillskin4671 more honest then you, god show him every thing and found it. know everyone eles is jumping on the band wagan saying they found it

@markcondren2617

4 жыл бұрын

@Musaaud Al-hawaly that is not true god showed him, they tried to get him away from their.

@rumpestillskin4671

4 жыл бұрын

@@markcondren2617 You can't think critically, that's yours and the religious peoples problem. Geology shows no evidence of a global flood and the rest of the world shows now history of a flood !!! For gumby sake look at the science !!!!

Every since i came across these videos it's hard not to watch them especially the ones that shows proof of the crossing of the sea

That is the one! even lijah's cave is there!

@willow9530

4 жыл бұрын

with the almond tree in the middle of two boulders..

Viveka Ponten helped Ron Wyatt with pictures of this amazing discovery.

@willow9530

4 жыл бұрын

she also gave him bones from the sea from Saudi side

@Michael-pn5lp

10 ай бұрын

Thinking logically: Three days travel to the Red Sea crossing 15th,16th,17th Abib. 18th Abib weekly Sabbath taken out of the Egyptian pit through the Red Sea and celebrating on the opposite shore. 19th, 20th, 21st and arriving during 22nd Abib at the bitter waters of Marah. Note the 3 day - 4th day pattern ! The three day distance they travelled before the crossing, should be three quarters of the four day distance they travelled after the crossing to get to Marah. This should help eliminate incorrect proposed Red Sea crossing points. The north end of the Gulf of Suez is still the most likely crossing point - possibly in the area that is now dried up, since the Gulf of Suez is proven to have extended much further north in antiquity. i.e. travelling 9 days distance in three days to get to the crossing, and then travelling 4 days distance in 4 days to Marah after the crossing, doesn't make sense. The same applies to other proposed crossing sites ! On the first day of the 15th they left soon after midnight and travelled to Succoth, giving a maximum of 18 hours travel. They must have rested overnight after 18 hours travel. The second afternoon they "encamped" in Etham. After turning away from leaving Egypt, the third afternoon they got to Pihahiroth where the crossing took place. The Straits of Tiran are about 500 kilometers from Rameses - it just can't be done ! It's about 400km to the top of the Gulf of Aqaba, which is just as unlikely a three day journey for a multitude of men, women and children with herds of livestock. So the whole Gulf of Aqaba is ruled out, leaving only the top of the Gulf of Suez as the likely site - probably the dry bed of the sea that is proven to have extended further north in antiquity...

That’s the real Mountain 🏔

@Michael-pn5lp

10 ай бұрын

Thinking logically: Three days travel to the Red Sea crossing 15th,16th,17th Abib. 18th Abib weekly Sabbath taken out of the Egyptian pit through the Red Sea and celebrating on the opposite shore. 19th, 20th, 21st and arriving during 22nd Abib at the bitter waters of Marah. Note the 3 day - 4th day pattern ! The three day distance they travelled before the crossing, should be three quarters of the four day distance they travelled after the crossing to get to Marah. This should help eliminate incorrect proposed Red Sea crossing points. The north end of the Gulf of Suez is still the most likely crossing point - possibly in the area that is now dried up, since the Gulf of Suez is proven to have extended much further north in antiquity. i.e. travelling 9 days distance in three days to get to the crossing, and then travelling 4 days distance in 4 days to Marah after the crossing, doesn't make sense. The same applies to other proposed crossing sites ! On the first day of the 15th they left soon after midnight and travelled to Succoth, giving a maximum of 18 hours travel. They must have rested overnight after 18 hours travel. The second afternoon they "encamped" in Etham. After turning away from leaving Egypt, the third afternoon they got to Pihahiroth where the crossing took place. The Straits of Tiran are about 500 kilometers from Rameses - it just can't be done ! It's about 400km to the top of the Gulf of Aqaba, which is just as unlikely a three day journey for a multitude of men, women and children with herds of livestock. So the whole Gulf of Aqaba is ruled out, leaving only the top of the Gulf of Suez as the likely site - probably the dry bed of the sea that is proven to have extended further north in antiquity...

Even paul said he went there in Arabia an stay three years rite after he got saved read it in book of acts

@emmanuelmasih2296

4 жыл бұрын

biblehub.com/galatians/4-25.htm

@jackman6256

4 жыл бұрын

@@emmanuelmasih2296 yes you are right also I dont understand all of sudden they say oh look the mountain of god is in Arabia when ni it's been there all along

@bobbypoe7877

4 жыл бұрын

Gal:1:17 too

@Michael-pn5lp

10 ай бұрын

Thinking logically: Three days travel to the Red Sea crossing 15th,16th,17th Abib. 18th Abib weekly Sabbath taken out of the Egyptian pit through the Red Sea and celebrating on the opposite shore. 19th, 20th, 21st and arriving during 22nd Abib at the bitter waters of Marah. Note the 3 day - 4th day pattern ! The three day distance they travelled before the crossing, should be three quarters of the four day distance they travelled after the crossing to get to Marah. This should help eliminate incorrect proposed Red Sea crossing points. The north end of the Gulf of Suez is still the most likely crossing point - possibly in the area that is now dried up, since the Gulf of Suez is proven to have extended much further north in antiquity. i.e. travelling 9 days distance in three days to get to the crossing, and then travelling 4 days distance in 4 days to Marah after the crossing, doesn't make sense. The same applies to other proposed crossing sites ! On the first day of the 15th they left soon after midnight and travelled to Succoth, giving a maximum of 18 hours travel. They must have rested overnight after 18 hours travel. The second afternoon they "encamped" in Etham. After turning away from leaving Egypt, the third afternoon they got to Pihahiroth where the crossing took place. The Straits of Tiran are about 500 kilometers from Rameses - it just can't be done ! It's about 400km to the top of the Gulf of Aqaba, which is just as unlikely a three day journey for a multitude of men, women and children with herds of livestock. So the whole Gulf of Aqaba is ruled out, leaving only the top of the Gulf of Suez as the likely site - probably the dry bed of the sea that is proven to have extended further north in antiquity....

Wyatt discovered this 40 some years ago

@Michael-pn5lp

10 ай бұрын

Thinking logically: Three days travel to the Red Sea crossing 15th,16th,17th Abib. 18th Abib weekly Sabbath taken out of the Egyptian pit through the Red Sea and celebrating on the opposite shore. 19th, 20th, 21st and arriving during 22nd Abib at the bitter waters of Marah. Note the 3 day - 4th day pattern ! The three day distance they travelled before the crossing, should be three quarters of the four day distance they travelled after the crossing to get to Marah. This should help eliminate incorrect proposed Red Sea crossing points. The north end of the Gulf of Suez is still the most likely crossing point - possibly in the area that is now dried up, since the Gulf of Suez is proven to have extended much further north in antiquity. i.e. travelling 9 days distance in three days to get to the crossing, and then travelling 4 days distance in 4 days to Marah after the crossing, doesn't make sense. The same applies to other proposed crossing sites ! On the first day of the 15th they left soon after midnight and travelled to Succoth, giving a maximum of 18 hours travel. They must have rested overnight after 18 hours travel. The second afternoon they "encamped" in Etham. After turning away from leaving Egypt, the third afternoon they got to Pihahiroth where the crossing took place. The Straits of Tiran are about 500 kilometers from Rameses - it just can't be done ! It's about 400km to the top of the Gulf of Aqaba, which is just as unlikely a three day journey for a multitude of men, women and children with herds of livestock. So the whole Gulf of Aqaba is ruled out, leaving only the top of the Gulf of Suez as the likely site - probably the dry bed of the sea that is proven to have extended further north in antiquity....

Love the whole DVD the Exodus revealed and the wonderful book the Exodus Case by Dr Lennart Moller

@Michael-pn5lp

10 ай бұрын

Thinking logically: Three days travel to the Red Sea crossing 15th,16th,17th Abib. 18th Abib weekly Sabbath taken out of the Egyptian pit through the Red Sea and celebrating on the opposite shore. 19th, 20th, 21st and arriving during 22nd Abib at the bitter waters of Marah. Note the 3 day - 4th day pattern ! The three day distance they travelled before the crossing, should be three quarters of the four day distance they travelled after the crossing to get to Marah. This should help eliminate incorrect proposed Red Sea crossing points. The north end of the Gulf of Suez is still the most likely crossing point - possibly in the area that is now dried up, since the Gulf of Suez is proven to have extended much further north in antiquity. i.e. travelling 9 days distance in three days to get to the crossing, and then travelling 4 days distance in 4 days to Marah after the crossing, doesn't make sense. The same applies to other proposed crossing sites ! On the first day of the 15th they left soon after midnight and travelled to Succoth, giving a maximum of 18 hours travel. They must have rested overnight after 18 hours travel. The second afternoon they "encamped" in Etham. After turning away from leaving Egypt, the third afternoon they got to Pihahiroth where the crossing took place. The Straits of Tiran are about 500 kilometers from Rameses - it just can't be done ! It's about 400km to the top of the Gulf of Aqaba, which is just as unlikely a three day journey for a multitude of men, women and children with herds of livestock. So the whole Gulf of Aqaba is ruled out, leaving only the top of the Gulf of Suez as the likely site - probably the dry bed of the sea that is proven to have extended further north in antiquity...

Jebel Al Musa wow isn't this biblical proof. It's why you never deny

@Michael-pn5lp

10 ай бұрын

Thinking logically: Three days travel to the Red Sea crossing 15th,16th,17th Abib. 18th Abib weekly Sabbath taken out of the Egyptian pit through the Red Sea and celebrating on the opposite shore. 19th, 20th, 21st and arriving during 22nd Abib at the bitter waters of Marah. Note the 3 day - 4th day pattern ! The three day distance they travelled before the crossing, should be three quarters of the four day distance they travelled after the crossing to get to Marah. This should help eliminate incorrect proposed Red Sea crossing points. The north end of the Gulf of Suez is still the most likely crossing point - possibly in the area that is now dried up, since the Gulf of Suez is proven to have extended much further north in antiquity. i.e. travelling 9 days distance in three days to get to the crossing, and then travelling 4 days distance in 4 days to Marah after the crossing, doesn't make sense. The same applies to other proposed crossing sites ! On the first day of the 15th they left soon after midnight and travelled to Succoth, giving a maximum of 18 hours travel. They must have rested overnight after 18 hours travel. The second afternoon they "encamped" in Etham. After turning away from leaving Egypt, the third afternoon they got to Pihahiroth where the crossing took place. The Straits of Tiran are about 500 kilometers from Rameses - it just can't be done ! It's about 400km to the top of the Gulf of Aqaba, which is just as unlikely a three day journey for a multitude of men, women and children with herds of livestock. So the whole Gulf of Aqaba is ruled out, leaving only the top of the Gulf of Suez as the likely site - probably the dry bed of the sea that is proven to have extended further north in antiquity...

Thanks lord for your blessings places still love 💕 and looking 👀 nice 👍 and interesting ours lord House Places, praise the lord amen Alleluia Alleluia Amen 😍🌎💝🏠✅💯...

@Michael-pn5lp

10 ай бұрын

Thinking logically: Three days travel to the Red Sea crossing 15th,16th,17th Abib. 18th Abib weekly Sabbath taken out of the Egyptian pit through the Red Sea and celebrating on the opposite shore. 19th, 20th, 21st and arriving during 22nd Abib at the bitter waters of Marah. Note the 3 day - 4th day pattern ! The three day distance they travelled before the crossing, should be three quarters of the four day distance they travelled after the crossing to get to Marah. This should help eliminate incorrect proposed Red Sea crossing points. The north end of the Gulf of Suez is still the most likely crossing point - possibly in the area that is now dried up, since the Gulf of Suez is proven to have extended much further north in antiquity. i.e. travelling 9 days distance in three days to get to the crossing, and then travelling 4 days distance in 4 days to Marah after the crossing, doesn't make sense. The same applies to other proposed crossing sites ! On the first day of the 15th they left soon after midnight and travelled to Succoth, giving a maximum of 18 hours travel. They must have rested overnight after 18 hours travel. The second afternoon they "encamped" in Etham. After turning away from leaving Egypt, the third afternoon they got to Pihahiroth where the crossing took place. The Straits of Tiran are about 500 kilometers from Rameses - it just can't be done ! It's about 400km to the top of the Gulf of Aqaba, which is just as unlikely a three day journey for a multitude of men, women and children with herds of livestock. So the whole Gulf of Aqaba is ruled out, leaving only the top of the Gulf of Suez as the likely site - probably the dry bed of the sea that is proven to have extended further north in antiquity....

❤️

@Michael-pn5lp

10 ай бұрын

Thinking logically: Three days travel to the Red Sea crossing 15th,16th,17th Abib. 18th Abib weekly Sabbath taken out of the Egyptian pit through the Red Sea and celebrating on the opposite shore. 19th, 20th, 21st and arriving during 22nd Abib at the bitter waters of Marah. Note the 3 day - 4th day pattern ! The three day distance they travelled before the crossing, should be three quarters of the four day distance they travelled after the crossing to get to Marah. This should help eliminate incorrect proposed Red Sea crossing points. The north end of the Gulf of Suez is still the most likely crossing point - possibly in the area that is now dried up, since the Gulf of Suez is proven to have extended much further north in antiquity. i.e. travelling 9 days distance in three days to get to the crossing, and then travelling 4 days distance in 4 days to Marah after the crossing, doesn't make sense. The same applies to other proposed crossing sites ! On the first day of the 15th they left soon after midnight and travelled to Succoth, giving a maximum of 18 hours travel. They must have rested overnight after 18 hours travel. The second afternoon they "encamped" in Etham. After turning away from leaving Egypt, the third afternoon they got to Pihahiroth where the crossing took place. The Straits of Tiran are about 500 kilometers from Rameses - it just can't be done ! It's about 400km to the top of the Gulf of Aqaba, which is just as unlikely a three day journey for a multitude of men, women and children with herds of livestock. So the whole Gulf of Aqaba is ruled out, leaving only the top of the Gulf of Suez as the likely site - probably the dry bed of the sea that is proven to have extended further north in antiquity....

The proof is in the scriptures.

@Michael-pn5lp

10 ай бұрын

Thinking logically: Three days travel to the Red Sea crossing 15th,16th,17th Abib. 18th Abib weekly Sabbath taken out of the Egyptian pit through the Red Sea and celebrating on the opposite shore. 19th, 20th, 21st and arriving during 22nd Abib at the bitter waters of Marah. Note the 3 day - 4th day pattern ! The three day distance they travelled before the crossing, should be three quarters of the four day distance they travelled after the crossing to get to Marah. This should help eliminate incorrect proposed Red Sea crossing points. The north end of the Gulf of Suez is still the most likely crossing point - possibly in the area that is now dried up, since the Gulf of Suez is proven to have extended much further north in antiquity. i.e. travelling 9 days distance in three days to get to the crossing, and then travelling 4 days distance in 4 days to Marah after the crossing, doesn't make sense. The same applies to other proposed crossing sites ! On the first day of the 15th they left soon after midnight and travelled to Succoth, giving a maximum of 18 hours travel. They must have rested overnight after 18 hours travel. The second afternoon they "encamped" in Etham. After turning away from leaving Egypt, the third afternoon they got to Pihahiroth where the crossing took place. The Straits of Tiran are about 500 kilometers from Rameses - it just can't be done ! It's about 400km to the top of the Gulf of Aqaba, which is just as unlikely a three day journey for a multitude of men, women and children with herds of livestock. So the whole Gulf of Aqaba is ruled out, leaving only the top of the Gulf of Suez as the likely site - probably the dry bed of the sea that is proven to have extended further north in antiquity....

I see a perfect plot for Indiana Jones 5!

@Michael-pn5lp

10 ай бұрын

Thinking logically: Three days travel to the Red Sea crossing 15th,16th,17th Abib. 18th Abib weekly Sabbath taken out of the Egyptian pit through the Red Sea and celebrating on the opposite shore. 19th, 20th, 21st and arriving during 22nd Abib at the bitter waters of Marah. Note the 3 day - 4th day pattern ! The three day distance they travelled before the crossing, should be three quarters of the four day distance they travelled after the crossing to get to Marah. This should help eliminate incorrect proposed Red Sea crossing points. The north end of the Gulf of Suez is still the most likely crossing point - possibly in the area that is now dried up, since the Gulf of Suez is proven to have extended much further north in antiquity. i.e. travelling 9 days distance in three days to get to the crossing, and then travelling 4 days distance in 4 days to Marah after the crossing, doesn't make sense. The same applies to other proposed crossing sites ! On the first day of the 15th they left soon after midnight and travelled to Succoth, giving a maximum of 18 hours travel. They must have rested overnight after 18 hours travel. The second afternoon they "encamped" in Etham. After turning away from leaving Egypt, the third afternoon they got to Pihahiroth where the crossing took place. The Straits of Tiran are about 500 kilometers from Rameses - it just can't be done ! It's about 400km to the top of the Gulf of Aqaba, which is just as unlikely a three day journey for a multitude of men, women and children with herds of livestock. So the whole Gulf of Aqaba is ruled out, leaving only the top of the Gulf of Suez as the likely site - probably the dry bed of the sea that is proven to have extended further north in antiquity...

It makes a lot more sense that Moses wouldn't have been in the Sinai Peninsula, given that the Egyptians maintained a heavy presence there and his father-in-law was on the east side of the sea. However it's a bit of a puzzle as to why the Sinai Peninsula is so named if Mt. Sinai is in Midian where ancient cartography and local testimony mark it to be.

@Michael-pn5lp

10 ай бұрын

Thinking logically: Three days travel to the Red Sea crossing 15th,16th,17th Abib. 18th Abib weekly Sabbath taken out of the Egyptian pit through the Red Sea and celebrating on the opposite shore. 19th, 20th, 21st and arriving during 22nd Abib at the bitter waters of Marah. Note the 3 day - 4th day pattern ! The three day distance they travelled before the crossing, should be three quarters of the four day distance they travelled after the crossing to get to Marah. This should help eliminate incorrect proposed Red Sea crossing points. The north end of the Gulf of Suez is still the most likely crossing point - possibly in the area that is now dried up, since the Gulf of Suez is proven to have extended much further north in antiquity. i.e. travelling 9 days distance in three days to get to the crossing, and then travelling 4 days distance in 4 days to Marah after the crossing, doesn't make sense. The same applies to other proposed crossing sites ! On the first day of the 15th they left soon after midnight and travelled to Succoth, giving a maximum of 18 hours travel. They must have rested overnight after 18 hours travel. The second afternoon they "encamped" in Etham. After turning away from leaving Egypt, the third afternoon they got to Pihahiroth where the crossing took place. The Straits of Tiran are about 500 kilometers from Rameses - it just can't be done ! It's about 400km to the top of the Gulf of Aqaba, which is just as unlikely a three day journey for a multitude of men, women and children with herds of livestock. So the whole Gulf of Aqaba is ruled out, leaving only the top of the Gulf of Suez as the likely site - probably the dry bed of the sea that is proven to have extended further north in antiquity...

😮🌏

@Michael-pn5lp

10 ай бұрын

Thinking logically: Three days travel to the Red Sea crossing 15th,16th,17th Abib. 18th Abib weekly Sabbath taken out of the Egyptian pit through the Red Sea and celebrating on the opposite shore. 19th, 20th, 21st and arriving during 22nd Abib at the bitter waters of Marah. Note the 3 day - 4th day pattern ! The three day distance they travelled before the crossing, should be three quarters of the four day distance they travelled after the crossing to get to Marah. This should help eliminate incorrect proposed Red Sea crossing points. The north end of the Gulf of Suez is still the most likely crossing point - possibly in the area that is now dried up, since the Gulf of Suez is proven to have extended much further north in antiquity. i.e. travelling 9 days distance in three days to get to the crossing, and then travelling 4 days distance in 4 days to Marah after the crossing, doesn't make sense. The same applies to other proposed crossing sites ! On the first day of the 15th they left soon after midnight and travelled to Succoth, giving a maximum of 18 hours travel. They must have rested overnight after 18 hours travel. The second afternoon they "encamped" in Etham. After turning away from leaving Egypt, the third afternoon they got to Pihahiroth where the crossing took place. The Straits of Tiran are about 500 kilometers from Rameses - it just can't be done ! It's about 400km to the top of the Gulf of Aqaba, which is just as unlikely a three day journey for a multitude of men, women and children with herds of livestock. So the whole Gulf of Aqaba is ruled out, leaving only the top of the Gulf of Suez as the likely site - probably the dry bed of the sea that is proven to have extended further north in antiquity....

That's why the won't allow no one to go in.....they want to hide the TRUTH...

@Michael-pn5lp

10 ай бұрын

Thinking logically: Three days travel to the Red Sea crossing 15th,16th,17th Abib. 18th Abib weekly Sabbath taken out of the Egyptian pit through the Red Sea and celebrating on the opposite shore. 19th, 20th, 21st and arriving during 22nd Abib at the bitter waters of Marah. Note the 3 day - 4th day pattern ! The three day distance they travelled before the crossing, should be three quarters of the four day distance they travelled after the crossing to get to Marah. This should help eliminate incorrect proposed Red Sea crossing points. The north end of the Gulf of Suez is still the most likely crossing point - possibly in the area that is now dried up, since the Gulf of Suez is proven to have extended much further north in antiquity. i.e. travelling 9 days distance in three days to get to the crossing, and then travelling 4 days distance in 4 days to Marah after the crossing, doesn't make sense. The same applies to other proposed crossing sites ! On the first day of the 15th they left soon after midnight and travelled to Succoth, giving a maximum of 18 hours travel. They must have rested overnight after 18 hours travel. The second afternoon they "encamped" in Etham. After turning away from leaving Egypt, the third afternoon they got to Pihahiroth where the crossing took place. The Straits of Tiran are about 500 kilometers from Rameses - it just can't be done ! It's about 400km to the top of the Gulf of Aqaba, which is just as unlikely a three day journey for a multitude of men, women and children with herds of livestock. So the whole Gulf of Aqaba is ruled out, leaving only the top of the Gulf of Suez as the likely site - probably the dry bed of the sea that is proven to have extended further north in antiquity...

The sign at 3:15 reads "Archeological Area". If it really were seen as that, why don't the Saudi's allow excavations? It is very frustrating.

@antonioacevedo5200

4 жыл бұрын

@Musaaud Al-hawaly I would like to see whether what is discovered lines up with what the Quran says.

@rickenterkin4720

4 жыл бұрын

@@antonioacevedo5200 that's JUST it....none will line up to the Quran. It all lines up to GOD'S WORD the HOLY BIBLE. If it's not allowed to be looked at & excavated then their lies are safe. Think how damning that would be....so in turn they will "protect it" to protect the Quran from being DE-BUNKED.

@timothya.olmeda7299

4 жыл бұрын

Antonio Acevedo The Saudi government has protected it. But they are considering building resorts around the sites, possibly damaging and destroying the land by modernization. Let's pray that this doesn't happen. Shalom

@antonioacevedo5200

4 жыл бұрын

@@timothya.olmeda7299 Yes, lets pray it does not happen.

@Michael-pn5lp

10 ай бұрын

Thinking logically: Three days travel to the Red Sea crossing 15th,16th,17th Abib. 18th Abib weekly Sabbath taken out of the Egyptian pit through the Red Sea and celebrating on the opposite shore. 19th, 20th, 21st and arriving during 22nd Abib at the bitter waters of Marah. Note the 3 day - 4th day pattern ! The three day distance they travelled before the crossing, should be three quarters of the four day distance they travelled after the crossing to get to Marah. This should help eliminate incorrect proposed Red Sea crossing points. The north end of the Gulf of Suez is still the most likely crossing point - possibly in the area that is now dried up, since the Gulf of Suez is proven to have extended much further north in antiquity. i.e. travelling 9 days distance in three days to get to the crossing, and then travelling 4 days distance in 4 days to Marah after the crossing, doesn't make sense. The same applies to other proposed crossing sites ! On the first day of the 15th they left soon after midnight and travelled to Succoth, giving a maximum of 18 hours travel. They must have rested overnight after 18 hours travel. The second afternoon they "encamped" in Etham. After turning away from leaving Egypt, the third afternoon they got to Pihahiroth where the crossing took place. The Straits of Tiran are about 500 kilometers from Rameses - it just can't be done ! It's about 400km to the top of the Gulf of Aqaba, which is just as unlikely a three day journey for a multitude of men, women and children with herds of livestock. So the whole Gulf of Aqaba is ruled out, leaving only the top of the Gulf of Suez as the likely site - probably the dry bed of the sea that is proven to have extended further north in antiquity....

Still I am looking for real mount sinai

Mount Horeb. “The Mountain of God’.

@iamjustsaying4787

4 ай бұрын

@mikem3789 Which God?

Moses

I think Prophet Moses and the Israelites were *more Jones* than Indiana Jones.

I have a question but im not puttin it on the internet

@rickenterkin4720

4 жыл бұрын

I'd love to know your question & try to help you out....

@timothya.olmeda7299

4 жыл бұрын

Angela Dobbs All questions have been answered before. There is no question that goes unanswered. Ask and you shall receive.

@Michael-pn5lp

10 ай бұрын

Thinking logically: Three days travel to the Red Sea crossing 15th,16th,17th Abib. 18th Abib weekly Sabbath taken out of the Egyptian pit through the Red Sea and celebrating on the opposite shore. 19th, 20th, 21st and arriving during 22nd Abib at the bitter waters of Marah. Note the 3 day - 4th day pattern ! The three day distance they travelled before the crossing, should be three quarters of the four day distance they travelled after the crossing to get to Marah. This should help eliminate incorrect proposed Red Sea crossing points. The north end of the Gulf of Suez is still the most likely crossing point - possibly in the area that is now dried up, since the Gulf of Suez is proven to have extended much further north in antiquity. i.e. travelling 9 days distance in three days to get to the crossing, and then travelling 4 days distance in 4 days to Marah after the crossing, doesn't make sense. The same applies to other proposed crossing sites ! On the first day of the 15th they left soon after midnight and travelled to Succoth, giving a maximum of 18 hours travel. They must have rested overnight after 18 hours travel. The second afternoon they "encamped" in Etham. After turning away from leaving Egypt, the third afternoon they got to Pihahiroth where the crossing took place. The Straits of Tiran are about 500 kilometers from Rameses - it just can't be done ! It's about 400km to the top of the Gulf of Aqaba, which is just as unlikely a three day journey for a multitude of men, women and children with herds of livestock. So the whole Gulf of Aqaba is ruled out, leaving only the top of the Gulf of Suez as the likely site - probably the dry bed of the sea that is proven to have extended further north in antiquity....

Thats truem Bundok ni moses yan

The book of Galatians is clear that Mount Sinai is in arabi

After reading Rev. 2:9, then who are the Hebrew Israelites and where are they now ?

@timothya.olmeda7299

4 жыл бұрын

Russell Stone The children of Israel remain scattered amongst the nations, and also within the borders of Israel, once Israel became a nation again in May 14 1948. Shalom

@russellstone1503

4 жыл бұрын

@@timothya.olmeda7299 read Rev. 2:9, they are not the people. Look up the suffix ISH also, as in Jewish.

@timothya.olmeda7299

4 жыл бұрын

Russell Stone The book of revelation is not from God. It is irrelevant to those who put their trust in only God. It only becomes relevant to the occupants of the world because the powers of men upon the earth have used its agenda to put the fear into believing in the trinity belief system, which distracts you from gaining knowledge of God, only found in the Torah (the Books of Moses) and the Haftorah (the chosen prophets of God). Instead, the trinity belief system agenda puts fear in the minds and hearts of its followers, which is tied to every known possible outlet, causing everyone with no true knowledge of God to become distant from having a proper relationship with God. It was only the Christian doctrine and the church who made the claim that if you do not confess with your mouth that Jesus Christ died and had risen from the dead and died for the atonement of mans sin. This idea was not from God. What happened was the church allowed their trinity belief system agenda to be inserted into the Jewish bible, causing contradiction and confusion into the minds of the reader, and through the translation of the original from Hebrew/ Aramiac language into Greek, Latin, English and so on... Causing the word of God to become lost in translation. The fact of the matter is, a translation by definition is a product of man. It cannot be from God. For instance, it is a historical fact that the church allowed the Archbishop of Canterbury Stephan Langton in the Middle Ages to unauthorizedly edit and separate important passages in the Jewish bible and the Christian doctrine. This allowed the reader to miss important information and the knowledge of God all throughout the different versions of the bibles since his involvement in the years 1244-1248. This action alone is forbidden by God. Deuteronomy 4:1-2 "Now, O Israel, listen to the statutes and the judgements which I teach you to observe, that you may live, and go in and possess the land which the Lord God of your fathers is giving you. You shall not add to the word which I command you, nor take away from it, that you may keep the commandments of the Lord your God which I command you." Deuteronomy 13:1-3 "Whatever I command you, be careful to observe it; you shall not add to it nor take away from it. If there arises among you a prophet or a dreamer of dreams, and he gives you a sign or a wonder, and the sign or wonder comes to pass, of which he spoke to you saying, 'Let us go after other gods'- which you have not known - 'and let us serve them,' you shall not listen to the words of that prophet or that dreamer of dreams, for the Lord your God is testing you to know whether you love the Lord your God with all of your heart and with all of your soul." If you'll notice, in your Christian bible, there is a separation, which is found now in the chapter before, in Deuteronomy 12:32, instead. The majority of Christians, when referring to a verse or chapter, they go directly to the specific verse for a reference, the majority of the time don't look at the verses before or after, they usually only go to a verse to get something there specifically, completely missing the gist of the entire warning or understanding. This is axiomatic. This warning in Deuteronomy 13 is specifically warning the reader to not add or take away from the word of God. And then gives you a warning about the prophet who dreams up a new way to God. And what happens to a people who do listen to the prophet who dreams a new way to God. Unfortunately, this just happens to be the description of the Christian doctrines trinity belief system and the prophet who wrote the bulk of the Christian doctrine, his name(s) is Saul/Paul. It was Saul/Paul who insists that he had visions/dreams of Jesus on the road to Damascus. The fact of the matter is, he never knew the character in the Christian doctrine known as Jesus. Never even met the man. Who gave Saul/Paul the authority to change the word of God? It wasn't God. Let's take a look at what Saul/Paul is guilty of, shall we? Let's compare what Saul/Paul wrote, and what God commands. Saul/Paul: Romans 10:6-8 "But the righteousness of faith speaks in this way, "Do not say in your heart, 'Who will ascend into heaven? ' " (that is, to bring Christ down from above) or, " 'Who will descend into the abyss?' " (that is, to bring Christ up from the dead). But what does it say? " The word is near you, in your mouth and in your heart" (that is, the word of faith which we preach): that if you confess with your mouth the Lord Jesus and believe in your heart that God has raised him from the dead, you will be saved.(?) Now, most importantly, let's take a look at what God commands. What is Gods opinion on the matter? GOD: Deuteronomy 30:11-14 "For this commandment which I command you today is not too mysterious for you, nor is it far off. It is not in heaven, that you should say, 'Who will ascend into heaven, that you should say, 'Who will ascend into heaven for us and bring it to us, that we may hear it and do it? Nor is it beyond the sea, that you should say, 'Who will go over the sea for us and bring it to us, that we may hear it and do it? But the word is very near you, in your mouth and in your heart, that you may do it." Read it again. Saul/Paul tells us all that we need someone else to do it for us, and we can't do it ourselves. And God tells us, 'THAT WE MAY HEAR IT AND DO IT!' THAT WE MAY HEAR IT AND DO IT!' 'THAT YOU MAY DO IT!' This is just one example. And you want me to believe that the book of revelation came from God? The entire Christian doctrine has no actual eyewitness accounts. They are epistles written some 50-300 years after the character known as Jesus was executed by the Roman Empire, for blasphemy. Saul/ Paul never even met Jesus, nor did he know the man. Therefore, even he is not an actual eyewitness account to the claims of the Christian doctrine. This is absurd to put your trust in the Christian doctrine. The fact of the matter is, you only believe in it because of what it supposedly offers you, and the threat that you will burn in hell for eternity. God never mentioned such a thing. Return to God all you ends of the earth! Shalom

@timothya.olmeda7299

4 жыл бұрын

Russell Stone The Jewish people are not the people? Says who? Are you telling me the individuals who stand out in public and scream and yell and shout out threats and obscenities at gatherings and call themselves the Israelites, that they are the ones described in the Jewish bible? Are kidding me? Let's be serious here. Those people do not adhere to the 613 commandments and statutes and judgements given by God on Mt.Sinai 3,300 years ago. The only ones who do are the Jewish faithful, the remnant that God has left throughout the generations. It is Israel that became a nation May 14, 1948 just as it was prophesied in the Jewish bible thousands of years prior. It is the nation of Israel who is Gods chosen servant. Isaiah 41:8-9 44:1 44:21 45:4 48:20 49:3..... .....The stunned reaction of the worlds nations to the unexpected vindication and redemption of the Jewish nation in the messianic age is a reoccurring theme throughout the Books of Moses. The word "You" in the above verses signifies the Jewish people who are sheltered and delivered by God. Therefore, Isaiah 53:8 concludes with their stunning confession, 'For the transgressions of my people (the Gentiles) they (the Jews) were stricken." The fact that the servant is spoken of in the third person, meaning plural, (Lamo) illustrate's beyond doubt that the servant is a nation, rather than a single individual. Both Hebrews and Israelites were already called " Jews " in later books of the Jewish bible, with the term "Jews" replacing the title "Children of Israel." This came from Abraham, the first Hebrew, and the father of the Jewish people. Deuteronomy 4:6 "For this will show your wisdom and understanding to the nations, who will hear about all these laws and say, 'Surely this great nation is a wise and understanding people.' No other nation of people have adhered to all the 613 commandments and statutes and judgements of God. Furthermore, the Christian doctrine is filled with some of the most horrendous antisemitism that has ever existed. And in every century since the Christian doctrine was printed and distributed it has fueled the hatred and violence and execution of hundreds upon hundreds of millions of the Jewish people even unto today. This is why most Christians have a distaste for Gods chosen servant. And God allowed this to happen as a test. And most are failing miserably. Return to God all you ends of the earth! Shalom

@russellstone1503

4 жыл бұрын

@@timothya.olmeda7299 I'm not a Christian, and I do believe the book of revaluation.

One of them the highest point is black burned to imagine that look no further this is it eureka

@Michael-pn5lp

10 ай бұрын

Thinking logically: Three days travel to the Red Sea crossing 15th,16th,17th Abib. 18th Abib weekly Sabbath taken out of the Egyptian pit through the Red Sea and celebrating on the opposite shore. 19th, 20th, 21st and arriving during 22nd Abib at the bitter waters of Marah. Note the 3 day - 4th day pattern ! The three day distance they travelled before the crossing, should be three quarters of the four day distance they travelled after the crossing to get to Marah. This should help eliminate incorrect proposed Red Sea crossing points. The north end of the Gulf of Suez is still the most likely crossing point - possibly in the area that is now dried up, since the Gulf of Suez is proven to have extended much further north in antiquity. i.e. travelling 9 days distance in three days to get to the crossing, and then travelling 4 days distance in 4 days to Marah after the crossing, doesn't make sense. The same applies to other proposed crossing sites ! On the first day of the 15th they left soon after midnight and travelled to Succoth, giving a maximum of 18 hours travel. They must have rested overnight after 18 hours travel. The second afternoon they "encamped" in Etham. After turning away from leaving Egypt, the third afternoon they got to Pihahiroth where the crossing took place. The Straits of Tiran are about 500 kilometers from Rameses - it just can't be done ! It's about 400km to the top of the Gulf of Aqaba, which is just as unlikely a three day journey for a multitude of men, women and children with herds of livestock. So the whole Gulf of Aqaba is ruled out, leaving only the top of the Gulf of Suez as the likely site - probably the dry bed of the sea that is proven to have extended further north in antiquity....

Ok!!! I think on this pretext they soon gonna claim that part of Saudi Arabia is part of the illegal and bastard child of the state of Israel the way they have been grabbing Palestinian lands!

A scientist once admitted that Christianity was absolutely true and that God existed he still wouldn’t believe. It wasn’t that the he couldn’t believe but that he won’t. Like Thomas it wasn’t I will not believe but I won’t.

@jamesr2408

4 жыл бұрын

Derek Hanna. I think it is not fair to hammer down on Thomas. He was no better or worse than all the other disciples. NONE of them believed MM, UNTIL they saw the Lord with their own eyes. At any rate the Lord said nothing bad against Thomas. In the end, it was necessary that they all see the Lord with their own eye, because they are our EYE WITNESSES. They are our eyes. The evidence of the gospel of Christ. The Christian faith cannot rest on make believe stories. God made the apostles eyewitnesses so that we can believe without presumption.

@derekhanna5834

4 жыл бұрын

James R don’t disagree. I only used what he said as a likeness.

@jamesr2408

4 жыл бұрын

Derek Hanna, all is good.

@Michael-pn5lp

10 ай бұрын

Thinking logically: Three days travel to the Red Sea crossing 15th,16th,17th Abib. 18th Abib weekly Sabbath taken out of the Egyptian pit through the Red Sea and celebrating on the opposite shore. 19th, 20th, 21st and arriving during 22nd Abib at the bitter waters of Marah. Note the 3 day - 4th day pattern ! The three day distance they travelled before the crossing, should be three quarters of the four day distance they travelled after the crossing to get to Marah. This should help eliminate incorrect proposed Red Sea crossing points. The north end of the Gulf of Suez is still the most likely crossing point - possibly in the area that is now dried up, since the Gulf of Suez is proven to have extended much further north in antiquity. i.e. travelling 9 days distance in three days to get to the crossing, and then travelling 4 days distance in 4 days to Marah after the crossing, doesn't make sense. The same applies to other proposed crossing sites ! On the first day of the 15th they left soon after midnight and travelled to Succoth, giving a maximum of 18 hours travel. They must have rested overnight after 18 hours travel. The second afternoon they "encamped" in Etham. After turning away from leaving Egypt, the third afternoon they got to Pihahiroth where the crossing took place. The Straits of Tiran are about 500 kilometers from Rameses - it just can't be done ! It's about 400km to the top of the Gulf of Aqaba, which is just as unlikely a three day journey for a multitude of men, women and children with herds of livestock. So the whole Gulf of Aqaba is ruled out, leaving only the top of the Gulf of Suez as the likely site - probably the dry bed of the sea that is proven to have extended further north in antiquity...

We are forbidden to make altars with iron tools, so no, that pile of rocks is not of Isra'els journey. Look for the plastered rock with the Torah of God written on it that Joshua ben Nun put when they came across the Jordan river.😊 Do you think Isra'el was giants?

@Michael-pn5lp

10 ай бұрын

Thinking logically: Three days travel to the Red Sea crossing 15th,16th,17th Abib. 18th Abib weekly Sabbath taken out of the Egyptian pit through the Red Sea and celebrating on the opposite shore. 19th, 20th, 21st and arriving during 22nd Abib at the bitter waters of Marah. Note the 3 day - 4th day pattern ! The three day distance they travelled before the crossing, should be three quarters of the four day distance they travelled after the crossing to get to Marah. This should help eliminate incorrect proposed Red Sea crossing points. The north end of the Gulf of Suez is still the most likely crossing point - possibly in the area that is now dried up, since the Gulf of Suez is proven to have extended much further north in antiquity. i.e. travelling 9 days distance in three days to get to the crossing, and then travelling 4 days distance in 4 days to Marah after the crossing, doesn't make sense. The same applies to other proposed crossing sites ! On the first day of the 15th they left soon after midnight and travelled to Succoth, giving a maximum of 18 hours travel. They must have rested overnight after 18 hours travel. The second afternoon they "encamped" in Etham. After turning away from leaving Egypt, the third afternoon they got to Pihahiroth where the crossing took place. The Straits of Tiran are about 500 kilometers from Rameses - it just can't be done ! It's about 400km to the top of the Gulf of Aqaba, which is just as unlikely a three day journey for a multitude of men, women and children with herds of livestock. So the whole Gulf of Aqaba is ruled out, leaving only the top of the Gulf of Suez as the likely site - probably the dry bed of the sea that is proven to have extended further north in antiquity....

Y

I will go if you guys will support me.

But then..one of our pastora said...Muslims are descendants of Ishmael

@timothya.olmeda7299

4 жыл бұрын

Joanna Honeyh We are all descendants of Adam, Noah, Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. Shalom

@oldtimerlee8820

11 ай бұрын

@@timothya.olmeda7299 We are all descendants of Adam, Noah and one of Noah's 3 sons (Shem, Ham, or Japheth). Many believe that Shem is the forefather of Abraham. We are not "all descendants" of Abraham and his sons.

@timothya.olmeda7299

11 ай бұрын

@@oldtimerlee8820 My comment 3 years ago was not necessarily referring to everyone being descendants of Abraham, but instead, collectively and depending on your tribal identity and or affiliation, because each of us came from somewhere. In reality though, we are all descendants of Noah and his family. Hence why the Noachide Laws are still in affect to the gentile nations. The Noachide movement is the oldest religion in the world, since the great reset flood of Noah.

The quality of the footage is very poor. This can be anything but evidence. Don't understand the need for this research anyways. If someone doesn't believe the scriptures, he will not believe this either.

@timothya.olmeda7299

4 жыл бұрын

Day Free For some, who are inherently blinded from the truth, they may need physical proof that something in scripture actually happened. These images may eventually steer them into the correct path of God. If you want better images, check out the recent drone images that have surfaced recently. Shalom

@Michael-pn5lp

10 ай бұрын

Thinking logically: Three days travel to the Red Sea crossing 15th,16th,17th Abib. 18th Abib weekly Sabbath taken out of the Egyptian pit through the Red Sea and celebrating on the opposite shore. 19th, 20th, 21st and arriving during 22nd Abib at the bitter waters of Marah. Note the 3 day - 4th day pattern ! The three day distance they travelled before the crossing, should be three quarters of the four day distance they travelled after the crossing to get to Marah. This should help eliminate incorrect proposed Red Sea crossing points. The north end of the Gulf of Suez is still the most likely crossing point - possibly in the area that is now dried up, since the Gulf of Suez is proven to have extended much further north in antiquity. i.e. travelling 9 days distance in three days to get to the crossing, and then travelling 4 days distance in 4 days to Marah after the crossing, doesn't make sense. The same applies to other proposed crossing sites ! On the first day of the 15th they left soon after midnight and travelled to Succoth, giving a maximum of 18 hours travel. They must have rested overnight after 18 hours travel. The second afternoon they "encamped" in Etham. After turning away from leaving Egypt, the third afternoon they got to Pihahiroth where the crossing took place. The Straits of Tiran are about 500 kilometers from Rameses - it just can't be done ! It's about 400km to the top of the Gulf of Aqaba, which is just as unlikely a three day journey for a multitude of men, women and children with herds of livestock. So the whole Gulf of Aqaba is ruled out, leaving only the top of the Gulf of Suez as the likely site - probably the dry bed of the sea that is proven to have extended further north in antiquity....

Where was moses before the exodus Around that area Where would he bring those people other than to a familiar place to him Jews need to accept that they are mixed with Ishmaelites and that they are not oure Israelites

That, or they know it’s connected to Christianity and don’t want anyone to see it 3:23

But I thought Sinai was in israel

@emmanuelmasih2296

4 жыл бұрын

biblehub.com/galatians/4-25.htm. There are 2 mount sinai

@timothya.olmeda7299

4 жыл бұрын

Joanna Honeyh The children of Israel were fleeing for their lives, they were traveling across the land and through the mountains.

@Michael-pn5lp

10 ай бұрын

Thinking logically: Three days travel to the Red Sea crossing 15th,16th,17th Abib. 18th Abib weekly Sabbath taken out of the Egyptian pit through the Red Sea and celebrating on the opposite shore. 19th, 20th, 21st and arriving during 22nd Abib at the bitter waters of Marah. Note the 3 day - 4th day pattern ! The three day distance they travelled before the crossing, should be three quarters of the four day distance they travelled after the crossing to get to Marah. This should help eliminate incorrect proposed Red Sea crossing points. The north end of the Gulf of Suez is still the most likely crossing point - possibly in the area that is now dried up, since the Gulf of Suez is proven to have extended much further north in antiquity. i.e. travelling 9 days distance in three days to get to the crossing, and then travelling 4 days distance in 4 days to Marah after the crossing, doesn't make sense. The same applies to other proposed crossing sites ! On the first day of the 15th they left soon after midnight and travelled to Succoth, giving a maximum of 18 hours travel. They must have rested overnight after 18 hours travel. The second afternoon they "encamped" in Etham. After turning away from leaving Egypt, the third afternoon they got to Pihahiroth where the crossing took place. The Straits of Tiran are about 500 kilometers from Rameses - it just can't be done ! It's about 400km to the top of the Gulf of Aqaba, which is just as unlikely a three day journey for a multitude of men, women and children with herds of livestock. So the whole Gulf of Aqaba is ruled out, leaving only the top of the Gulf of Suez as the likely site - probably the dry bed of the sea that is proven to have extended further north in antiquity....

All the Bible stories are most likely based on real features and events.

@Michael-pn5lp

10 ай бұрын

Thinking logically: Three days travel to the Red Sea crossing 15th,16th,17th Abib. 18th Abib weekly Sabbath taken out of the Egyptian pit through the Red Sea and celebrating on the opposite shore. 19th, 20th, 21st and arriving during 22nd Abib at the bitter waters of Marah. Note the 3 day - 4th day pattern ! The three day distance they travelled before the crossing, should be three quarters of the four day distance they travelled after the crossing to get to Marah. This should help eliminate incorrect proposed Red Sea crossing points. The north end of the Gulf of Suez is still the most likely crossing point - possibly in the area that is now dried up, since the Gulf of Suez is proven to have extended much further north in antiquity. i.e. travelling 9 days distance in three days to get to the crossing, and then travelling 4 days distance in 4 days to Marah after the crossing, doesn't make sense. The same applies to other proposed crossing sites ! On the first day of the 15th they left soon after midnight and travelled to Succoth, giving a maximum of 18 hours travel. They must have rested overnight after 18 hours travel. The second afternoon they "encamped" in Etham. After turning away from leaving Egypt, the third afternoon they got to Pihahiroth where the crossing took place. The Straits of Tiran are about 500 kilometers from Rameses - it just can't be done ! It's about 400km to the top of the Gulf of Aqaba, which is just as unlikely a three day journey for a multitude of men, women and children with herds of livestock. So the whole Gulf of Aqaba is ruled out, leaving only the top of the Gulf of Suez as the likely site - probably the dry bed of the sea that is proven to have extended further north in antiquity...

Thinking logically: Three days travel to the Red Sea crossing 15th,16th,17th Abib. 18th Abib weekly Sabbath taken out of the Egyptian pit through the Red Sea and celebrating on the opposite shore. 19th, 20th, 21st and arriving during 22nd Abib at the bitter waters of Marah. Note the 3 day - 4th day pattern ! The three day distance they travelled before the crossing, should be three quarters of the four day distance they travelled after the crossing to get to Marah. This should help eliminate incorrect proposed Red Sea crossing points. The north end of the Gulf of Suez is still the most likely crossing point - possibly in the area that is now dried up, since the Gulf of Suez is proven to have extended much further north in antiquity. i.e. travelling 9 days distance in three days to get to the crossing, and then travelling 4 days distance in 4 days to Marah after the crossing, doesn't make sense. The same applies to other proposed crossing sites ! On the first day of the 15th they left soon after midnight and travelled to Succoth, giving a maximum of 18 hours travel. They must have rested overnight after 18 hours travel. The second afternoon they "encamped" in Etham. After turning away from leaving Egypt, the third afternoon they got to Pihahiroth where the crossing took place. The Straits of Tiran are about 500 kilometers from Rameses - it just can't be done ! It's about 400km to the top of the Gulf of Aqaba, which is just as unlikely a three day journey for a multitude of men, women and children with herds of livestock. So the whole Gulf of Aqaba is ruled out, leaving only the top of the Gulf of Suez as the likely site - probably the dry bed of the sea that is proven to have extended further north in antiquity...

Sanskrit seekh le. Vanar sena ke parvat dikha ke bakwas kar raha hai. Bloody monkey mountain. ROFLMAO Hanuman Inko batao. Saale Pagal ho gaye hai. ROFLMAO Kabhi sumeru dikhate hai. Kabhi kishkinda. Fir bolte hai. Mountain of God. Zeus aya tha. Monkey ban ke. ROFLMAO aur nahi to devta to te. ROFLMAO

moses never lived there and that isn't the mountain...next time you try to discover anything read the jewish bible since we have the real bible and the true events and places

IT'S MYTHOLOGY FOLKS.

@MrBilioner

4 жыл бұрын

its evidence folk and you dont want to believe it, not cant but dont want.

@rumpestillskin4671

4 жыл бұрын

@@MrBilioner No it's not. Ron White is a dishonest conman.

@djhilman9767

4 жыл бұрын

RS: You may be right, but it will be difficult simply accept that without some detailed evidence to support it.

@rumpestillskin4671

4 жыл бұрын

@@djhilman9767 Finally a person with a mind There is a ton of evidence but the churchs don't want to lose their power, control, and massive income. Once again greed is mankinds short fall.

@MrBilioner

4 жыл бұрын

@@rumpestillskin4671 oh yea my church controls 20 people,they have the power to start wars as we are taking the money and using it to make 5000 challengers 2 tanks with 300 artillery. We have 20,000 soldiers and are ready for battle. Be serious, God does not need money but He knows we have to give so we dont become greedy. He knows that love for the money corrupts any hearth and even yours. I can leave the church any time I want, I go because of God,not men. This will sound like Im judging but can you tell me if you give your money to the needy? This video gives only 1 evidence and it does not show all that is. Did you maybe searched for more evidence or you rather stayed here and for you its enough to disprove the bible just because you did not find more evidence? Pardon me, you did not want to find more.