Should the Nobel Prize for the discovery of the Higgs Boson have gone, partially, to an experimentalist?

@NomenNescio99

Жыл бұрын

Experimental results should not be published until verified by theory.

@frankclose6537

Жыл бұрын

"Should" - no. "Could" - yes. The theory came first and that's what was rercognised. Wheetherr anohter prize should be awarded for the discovery - you would have to argue why that was higher priority than all teh rest off physics that is out there

@BillBSET

Жыл бұрын

The only thing I know as a barely educated EE, when those real smart guys couldn't figure it out, I was always asked last, I figured out what they couldn't see and then we fixed it. :-)

@TheMemesofDestruction

Жыл бұрын

We should give credit where credit is due. ^.^

@aprylvanryn5898

Жыл бұрын

@@BillBSET more neurons is usually better than less neurons. It's a shame that people almost never look for an alternative prospective. They say that when u have a hammer every problem is a nail. U avoid the hammer swingers. Then u come across a nail and don't recognize it.

There were so many experimentalist, designers and engineers that are unknown, and deserving of the prize.

@SameAsAnyOtherStranger

Жыл бұрын

Yeah. Looking at it from the perspective of a researcher who made some suggestion that was tried but didn't achieve the desired results, at least they eliminated a possibility. Future courses in particle physics can use these examples as a compendium of solutions that students might postulate as to how to observe an HBP. Yeah, I know that isn't how teaching is done. Once a way to do something is discovered, many can understand how to do it. I dunno. I'm looking at it from the perspective of someone who's hobby is scrapping together a CPU out of more discreet components to carry out assembly language commands. I'm a big believer in the process of discovery. Contributions to the greater good be damned. Just kidding. I'm always getting sidetracked whenever I play with image manipulation programs and animation software so if I ever post a video on KZread isn't that important.

@frankclose6537

Жыл бұрын

True. But Nobel is restricted to max of 3. Whether you agree that is good or bad, it is nonenteheless the reality

@davidwright8432

Жыл бұрын

A point often not even thought of. However wonderful - and even correct - the theory, no equipment, no confirmation or refutation.

Outstanding interview.

@DrBrianKeating

Жыл бұрын

Thanks so much! *What was your favorite takeaway from this conversation?* _Please join my mailing list to get _*_FREE_*_ notes & resources from this show! Click_ 👉 briankeating.com/mailing_list.php

A great talk as always but I missed two anecdotes in particular 1) That when funding for Cern was in the balance and the Minister for Science was the MP for Bristol which was the home to the Technical College which produced both Dirac and Higgs! 2) How Higgs on being told that Hawkins disagreed with his theory retorted - He may be a brilliant scientist but he doesn't know as much about particle physics as me! 😎

Wonderful !!! Outstanding eloquent guest, great subject, great questions. Satisfying to hear the details of QED/mass mechanism development in the sixtys with credit for all those involved.

@DrBrianKeating

Жыл бұрын

Glad you enjoyed it!

Most brilliant viewership merely in the Known Universe? And far beyond, Sir; so very far beyond! Great podcast, as always! Thanks all round.

A great video, a great guest. I'm translating the book (into Polish, if anyone wonders) and I'm impressed by the choice of the topic and the way the goal is reached. I hope this book is translated into tens of languages before Higgs dies, so when he does, it becomes a bestseller. It's a bit sad that Higgs or Penrose haven't been described in as much detailed as Hawking, who had not only biographical books, but also biographical films about him during his lifetime.

Fascinating stuff. Have you thought about interviewing Dr Matt Strassler, ex-Prof etc? I can imagine he has quite a story to tell on how the blandness of the Higgs boson shook up the expectations of entire physics groups.

@DrBrianKeating

Жыл бұрын

Good suggestion

That was a talk that got ever better. At 1:0:0 where Frank talks about where next, saying that understanding the Higgs Field is 1000% where physics must probe. The first steps into this are in the thinking in Loop Quantum Gravity. The Higgs Field is the Regulator of Energy, it is the medium in which Energy is able to exist in an ordered way that creates both time and Space as a byproduct of its regulated passage through the Higgs Field. Up til now Physics has been primarily concerned with What Energy/Matter IS, now we are moving into Why Energy/Matter WORKS. I’m sure that Physics thinks that they understand Energy and Matter, but the real drama where Quarks are the PowerHouse of the Universe and how their Energy creates Order through the Higgs Field is yet to be revealed, understood and quantified. For the Higgs, you just have to accept that It was a Nobel Piece Prize. Something as momentous took the disciplines of Physics Theory, Mathematics, and Empirical Evidence through experimentation.

GREAT INTERVIEW DR. KEATING! TY

Interesting conversation, It's unfortunate that a lot of expemimental scientists and engineers sometimes remain unsung heroes. Ones that also should be Nobel Laureates. Thanks.

I'm guessing like our current electrical systems mech requirements the Higgs will be essential to future advanced systems

Great talk. I’m thoroughly enjoying it. For me the Higgs Mechanism is many times more important than just the Mass. If my thinking is correct (if I can devise a way to prove this) the Higgs field is the Gravity mechanism and the Mass Mechanism, Peter Higgs will be up for another Nobel Prize.

@hyperduality2838

Жыл бұрын

Symmetry breaking:- Symmetry is dual to anti-symmetry. Time translation symmetry is dual to space translation symmetry. Time symmetry is dual to time asymmetry (entropy) - time duality. Space is dual to time -- Einstein. The spin statistics theorem:- Symmetric wave functions (Bosons, waves) are dual to anti-symmetric wave functions (Fermions, particles) -- wave/particle or quantum duality. Bosons are dual to Fermions -- atomic duality. Higgs Bosons are dual to Higgs Fermions (mass). The Higgs field should be called the Higgs duality field, symmetry breaking is dual. Ellipsoids are dual to hyperboloids -- Linear algebra, matrices -- Gilbert Strang. Energy is dual to mass -- Einstein. Gravitation is equivalent or dual (isomorphic) to acceleration -- Einstein's happiest thought, the principle of equivalence (duality). Mass is a by-product of conserving duality! Action is dual to reaction -- Sir Isaac Newton (the duality of force). Attraction is dual to repulsion, push is dual to pull -- forces & hence energy are dual. Symmetry breaking conserves duality. "Alway two there are" -- Yoda.

@williambunting803

Жыл бұрын

@@hyperduality2838 That is very good Hyperduality. If my mental model had to have a theme it would have to be: “Singularity”, there is only one, Energy. Dimensionless Infinite Energy. Entropy 1. Where Entropy is greater than 1 Energy exists finitely in 2 forms: Linear Dynamic Energy, and Loop Static Energy, where one is entangled with the other to create both Space and Time. Entropy 4. Matter is an emergent property of the entanglement of the Energies. The Forces of Nature: Gravity, the Strong Force, the Weak Force, and Electro Magnetism are developed properties of the entanglement and the energy that drives them is all energized from the entanglement interface between Dynamic Matter Energy and the Static Loop Energy Field. Entropy: Huge.

@hyperduality2838

Жыл бұрын

@@williambunting803 Energy is dual to mass -- Einstein. Dark energy is dual to dark matter. Energy is duality, duality is energy -- Generalized Duality -- the 5th law of thermodyanmics. Potential energy is dual to kinetic energy -- gravitational energy is dual. Apples fall to the ground because they are conserving duality. Positive curvature is dual to negative curvature -- Gauss, Riemann geometry. Curvature or gravitation is dual. Electro is dual to magnetic -- electro-magnetic energy is dual. Positive charge is dual to negative charge -- electric fields. North poles are dual to south poles -- magnetic fields. All energy in physics is dual and everything is made out of energy. Syntropy is dual to increasing entropy -- the 4th law of thermodynamics! The big bang is a Janus hole/point (two faces = duality) -- Julan Barbour, physicist. Topological holes cannot be shrunk down to zero -- non null homotopic. If there are Higgs Bosons then where are the Higgs Fermions? Bosons are dual to Fermions. To break symmetry requires an anti-symmetric wave function or duality!

@williambunting803

Жыл бұрын

@@hyperduality2838 I see your thinking Hyperduality, and it is beautiful reasoning. My comment is that this is an expression of the consequence of the Universal structure, not the structure itself. I m looking at the structure, which when you put the mathematics aside is really not that complicated. The duality in the structure is that Energy exists in two forms, Dynamic Open Loop (String) Energy, and Static Closed Loop Energy. The functional Duality is that Dynamic Energy goes straight, Static Energy resonates in one place. Dynamic Energy transfers Energy, Static Energy restrains movement of Energy. Dynamic Energy travels at infinite speed, Static Energy limits the speed of Dynamic Energy to the Speed of Light. Larger quantities of Dynamic Energy can only exist in a Static Energy Field in pockets in the field, in those stable pockets Dynamic Energy can gyrate at above light speed. The gyration of Dynamic Energy within the Static Energy Field creates a boundary turbulent reaction as Energy is transferred from the Dynamic Energy to the Static Energy Near Field and this reaction is what is seen as the Binding Strong Force, that binding Reaction is exponentially applied to the Field and the dissipating effect is Gravity. Matter is the sum of the energies, and the effects that they create. Free Dynamic Energy travels straight at the highest speed possible through the Medium, Contained Dynamic Energy forms pockets of Energy, or particles. Gravity is Energy applied to the Field by Matter (Particles of energy), The field (Higgs Field) IS Dark Energy, Dark Matter is the Field Energised to a different level (I speculate in the collapse moment of Neutron Stars into Black Holes). It is all very simple, but entropically complex. Evidence: Light travels a a fixed speed through the vacuum, but at different speeds through different media. Protons have a terminal speed through the medium with up to infinite energy required to fully reach that terminal speed. The Proton flattens out more the nearer it gets to that terminal speed ie the matter energy is hitting a physical energy barrier. This is a Quark inside out ie the energy inside a Quark trying to escape is hitting the same barrier to be deflected to gyrate eternally, internally. Hence its particle form, but that energy inside the Quark has no speed limit. The particle energy is the sum of the contained energy plus the energy of containment. It is very possible that photons travel as discs rather than points for the same reason, and if so this gives a mechanism for the particle/wave duality. Matter energizes the field in its very near proximity to a very high level, so photons passing very close matter will be more affected than photons passing matter at an extreme distance (Open Space). Maybe the reality is that it si not the photo or the electron that travels a a wave, but its effect on the field is a ripple, or a wave like. The problem with the simple wave analogy is that a propagating wave represents dispersed dissipating energy, whereas in the Jantje reality all energy is conserved so the entire system must be perfectly elastic. Thinking Thinking.

@hyperduality2838

Жыл бұрын

@@williambunting803 Dynamic is dual to static. "The art of progress is to preserve order amid change and to preserve change amid order" -- the duality of Alfred North Whitehead, mathematician. Dynamics is required in physics as a fundamental -- the magnetic field only exists when there is a velocity between the observer & the observed. Main stream physics is currently dominated by materialism or teleophobia. Teleophilia is dual to teleophobia. There are new laws of physics based upon teleology & duality but you will not hear about them due to teleophobic dogmas and rhetoric or unscientific biases. The Higgs field is technically a duality field -- Higgs Fermions. Teleological physics (syntropy) is dual to non-teleological physics (entropy). Physics has currently entered a dark age of ignorance! Mind (the internal soul, syntropy) is dual to matter (the external soul, entropy) -- Descartes or Plato's divided line. Breaking symmetry is a dual process -- symmetry is dual to anti-symmetry. "Always two there are" -- Yoda.

Great show, it's like a history of our time. Dr. Keating I really like your shows man. :-)

Thanks for sharing !

To me 4th of July will for ever be the Brout-Englert-Higgs boson day. Something to be celebrated annually. Maybe there should be fireworks lit that day... :)

@DrBrianKeating

Жыл бұрын

Lol. Thanks

Pedagogical is a new word for me. Thank you for that.

Frankly, I think physics is close to finding new elementary particles beyond the higgs boson.

"ELUSIVE" GOOD BOOK! TY FRANK!

Fantastic interview, interviewee and interviewer asking interesting questions on Higgs the person. I never knew that theorists expected the Higgs to be between 100-130Gev from its influence on the Top Quark.

@DrBrianKeating

Жыл бұрын

Thanks

@hyperduality2838

Жыл бұрын

Bosons are dual to Fermions -- atomic duality! Higgs Bosons are dual to Higgs Fermions (mass). Where are the Higgs Fermions? Symmetry breaking:- Symmetry is dual to anti-symmetry. Time translation symmetry is dual to space translation symmetry. Time symmetry is dual to time asymmetry (entropy) - time duality. Space is dual to time -- Einstein. The spin statistics theorem:- Symmetric wave functions (Bosons, waves) are dual to anti-symmetric wave functions (Fermions, particles) -- wave/particle or quantum duality. Bosons are dual to Fermions -- atomic duality. The Higgs field should be called the Higgs duality field, symmetry breaking is dual. Ellipsoids are dual to hyperboloids -- Linear algebra, matrices -- Gilbert Strang. Energy is dual to mass -- Einstein. Gravitation is equivalent or dual (isomorphic) to acceleration -- Einstein's happiest thought, the principle of equivalence (duality). Mass is a by-product of conserving duality! Action is dual to reaction -- Sir Isaac Newton (the duality of force). Attraction is dual to repulsion, push is dual to pull -- forces & hence energy are dual. Symmetry breaking conserves duality. "Always two there are" -- Yoda. Energy is duality, duality is energy -- Generalized duality, if energy is being conserved then duality is being conserved -- the 5th law of thermodynamics! Dark energy is dual to dark matter -- Janus holes/points, Julian Barbour, physicist. Universe or mono-verse is dual to multiverse. The big bang is a negative curvature singularity -- non null homotopic or dual.

My doctor says I should cut back on pions. They’re giving me too much mass.

@DrBrianKeating

Жыл бұрын

Lol. Me too

"Dans les champs de l'observation le hasard ne favorise que les esprits préparés", meaning "In the fields of observation, chance only favours the prepared mind." Quote: Louis Pasteur “The eye sees only what the mind is prepared to comprehend.” - Robertson Davies Fortuna Eruditis Favet ("fortune favours the prepared mind")Latin phrase

At least the HIggs gives one a scalar field, but apparently not the right one to serve as the Inflaton. But if Dark Matter is real, and consists of weakly interacting particles, it might be interesting to see if a scalar field could be associated with dark matter, and a high vacuum energy density in the past, and then the decay of that field provides both the normal particles of the standard model and dark matter. Dark matter would be, then, the majority of what's left of THAT scalar field. If it all fits together. Getting it to fit together would be the trick.

@DalbyJoakim

Жыл бұрын

Why not? A field does not have to be uniform in strength thoughout the universe, and not even thoughout a galaxy. In particular, a set of Bose Einstein condensates of structured Higgs field will have a coupling that depends on their interaction boundary - which grows with size but weakens in its local influence with size.

@Nogill0

Жыл бұрын

@@DalbyJoakim Briefly, the Higgs self-interaction does not have the correct value. Corrections are ad hoc and unconvincing.

@DalbyJoakim

Жыл бұрын

@@Nogill0 Current assumptions on how the Higgs field works are biased. Of we instead focus on what it allows for, we can see further.

@DalbyJoakim

Жыл бұрын

The Higgs field is more fundamental than the other particle fields in the standard model. It was realized last, but comes first. But that is not easy to get a grip on when you already assumed everything that exists is what comes after. It helps to not “know” too much about what we believed to be the only truth. I would start the idea building from scratch instead. Assume there is just a 4D (there are many reasons for choosing just 4D). What happens if it is not well defined, i. e. it has uncertainty in its definition of 4D? How is such uncertainty dispersed? What would make it more well defined - more certain, rigid-like? Could that rigidity be related to formation of a space-time? What is “formation” of a space-time? We know its “curvature” relates to a scalar, Higgs field. We envision it as a pressure wave in our space-time that causes space-time to curve in a well-defined way. But, what makes it possible to have a stable curvature of a space-time? Note that I use “of” “a” space-time. Can there be others? How are those dispersed, and what does an interaction boundary between them look like? Too keep this brief I would like to point to John Macken 4D density theory - a scalar field whose dispersion gives rise to gravitywave-like structures in 4D. Maybe the Higgs boson is the simplest structure of 4D “gravitywaves” possible, and that it is when such structures get together in what we call a single Bose-Einstein condensate that a stable space-time can form, that can contain all the other particles as higher order structures inside it? Structures that can evolve to think about how they come about, but behave like fish not yet being fully aware of the water they exist in? John Macken 4D space theory, John Williamson 4D field theory and Thad Roberts field knot theory (verified now) are the new foundations we need to get a grip on to understand how we are even possible. We are part of what makes a space-time stable. Its interactions. But that, is a loong story. Evolution started earlier than we imagined...

A statement by Steven Weinberg In a contribution released in May, 2012, on the site of the New York Review of books, Steven Weinberg, 1979 Nobel Prize, comes back to the history: “In his recent book, The Infinity Puzzle (Basic Books, 2011), Frank Close points out that a mistake of mine was in part responsible for the term “Higgs boson.” In my 1967 paper on the unification of weak and electromagnetic forces, I cited 1964 work by Peter Higgs and two other sets of theorists. (...) As to my responsibility for the name “Higgs boson,” because of a mistake in reading the dates on these three earlier papers, I thought that the earliest was the one by Higgs, so in my 1967 paper I cited Higgs first, and have done so since then. Other physicists apparently have followed my lead. But as Close points out, the earliest paper of the three I cited was actually the one by Robert Brout and François Englert. In extenuation of my mistake, I should note that Higgs and Brout and Englert did their work independently and at about the same time, as also did the third group (Gerald Guralnik, C.R. Hagen, and Tom Kibble). But the name “Higgs boson” seems to have stuck.” (As to the last sentence, let us recall, however, that Guralnik, Hagen, and Kibble do quote in their 1964 paper the works of Brout-Englert and Higgs).

If anything, an experimentalist or top engineer should have gotten it. In itself the particle was expected to be found by CERN (basically nothing else was) and it happened as expected. As for the added value of the Higgs particle; I really don’t see it. There are no elementary ‘biljart balls’ flying around giving other particles properties. It is the other way around. Moving objects will disturb the grid fieldlines around them and the properties of these elementary distortions is what we measure and for which we use the misnomer of ‘elementary particles’. There are no ‘force giving’ or ‘mass giving’ particles, there are only the different specific grid distortions (representing what we call ‘charge, mass, spin’ ). Combined, they result in a specific transverse wave distortion for each point in spacetime, resulting in an equal an opposite longitudinal contraction in the fabric of spacetime itself. That is the true symmetry. As for mass; If we want to know where mass comes from , then we should go back and revisit Einstein Special Relativity. It is time we start appreciating that there is a physical (!) link between speed induced contraction of frontal space and time and the simultateous gain of mass (inverted time) and energy (inverted space) of the speeding obejct itself. Gosh, could the loss of one possibly be related to the gain of the other? As in: the frontal contracted spacetime getting orthogonally wrapped in ‘quanta’ of windings (a standing wave) around the speeding object. Gosh , could that be the origin of what we call ‘quanta’ ? In stead of doling out Prizes we had better adjust our physics 1.1 curriculum and construct the spacetime-energymass diagram in stead of the merely the ‘space time’ diagram. There are limits to pretending not to know what the correct fundament is. We need to unlearn more then we need to learn IMHO…

@ianp3112

Жыл бұрын

You should listen to yourself and unlearn all the misinformation and bias in your comment! Go check out David Butler and his explanation of the higgs in his ' how small is it?' series. I would highly recommend watching the whole series, to get the basics right at least! Cheers 😽

The (m_e) is a tensor for 9.80665 m/s^2, now.

An alt theory of a portion of cosmology based upon Sternglass-Einstein work late 50's. They found a named meson matching dynamic property equations in the lab of 2 counter-rotating pairs of spinning, bound electron_positrons. Next, as 1st condensates after a BigBang a neutrino hits a high viscosity charge entity, neutral whole perfect opposites spun off the energy lost by the neutrino equals the energy_of_annihilation when a pair collapses. This should model. To point out StdModel is empirical, "particles physics" needs fluids, gravity can be an omnipresent fluid that transmits forces yet isn't one the StdModel analog the Higgs. Hard to shake it off for the work they did, of 2 papers the property eqa's weren't shown in detail, things fit too well. Ymmv 🍺

@jellymop

Жыл бұрын

So like an aether? Gravity? That sounds familiar actually

@ttmallard

Жыл бұрын

@@jellymop Yes, the concept not new afaik, to model it with an eys to mass attraction, the gravitational constant & fine structure constant ... fun stuff 🍺

Hi, in my opinion, maybe difrent prizes, one for the idea, other to the first experimentalists, that prove that the idea is correct or not. Also have a question, its possible colide anti-matter, whit anti-matter?

@DalbyJoakim

Жыл бұрын

In dense matter it is. It is called a fermion hole-hole interaction.

Addressed to the Expert. OK

9:13 Not by the congress, but initially by P.W. Anderson.

@DalbyJoakim

Жыл бұрын

"We know how much energy it takes to bubble up" the Higgs pressure field into a knot boson that can join its nearest Bose Einstein gravity condensate. A touch of clarity in the water we can't see because we are part of it...

Gravity, how does thermal energy pull down? Thermal energy is outward force of pressure known as weight in the energy contained in magnetic fields of forced cycling circulation patterns in resistance within, and without, all of entanglement of mass. Earth is occupied areas of space, with resistance passing through it, in transference through mass, in forward momentum. Forward momentum is reduced by magnetic fields created by resistance to forward momentum creating magnetic fields. Forward momentum is thermal energy singularity frequencies pushing mass in unidirectional flow, in reinforcement of resistance from behind forward momentum. Space is vibrating as thermal energy singularity frequencies in resistance to cold space, out of entanglement of mass. Mass amplifies space, and proximity space, surrounding mass, as it passes through it. Exchanging cold resistance and thermal energy singularity frequencies. Mass decays in these exchanges because the exchanges of thermal energy and cold resistance aren't exact. This exchange of energy and resistance not being equal point to point exchanges causes decay and/or aging. Maximum momentum velocity is thermal energy singularity frequencies outside of entanglement. These frequencies coexist throughout space as dark energy. When two or more combine and harmonize, resistance increases and repels these singularities into quatum magnetic fields, reversal of momentum into cycling circulation patterns of mass. Light is in a magnetic field of force cycling circulation frequencies, reducing in distance as quantum magnetic fields of vibrations. These magnetic fields of light amplify space in foward maximum momentum velocity contained in magnetic fields cycling circulation patterns of mass and distance of vibrating forward is reduced in equalization to cycling magnetic fields of forced motion holding mass together. Outward force of pressure known as weight is in the table of elements. Area of mass, amount of cold, resistance, amount of thermal energy singularity frequencies rebounding in magnetic fields of cycling. Cold resistance in mass, held in by magnetic fields of forced cycling circulation of thermal energy singularity frequencies. Cold resistance repels thermal energy outward as weight. Hydrogen absorbs thermal energy and expands into helium. Hydrogen forward momentum is faster than helium. The weight contained in magnetic fields cycling thermal energy reduces its forward momentum by channeling its forward momentum intocycling into itself. Lead has more thermal energy than iron. It takes less thermal energy to melt lead than iron. Equalization isn't even in iron, that's why it's magnetic. If you add thermal energy to iron it loses its magnetism. Temporarily.

God particle? It only accounts for 1% of mass so does that make it 1% of a God particle? And it only accounts for 2 particles used by the weak force. Isn't the glueon more significant since it accounts for 99% of mass? I wonder if the 3 sigma prediction that protons have 5 quarks will eventually reach 5 sigma? These seem much more important to physics than the Higgs Boson.

Theory of Everything solution (short version): Swap from Newton "real/necessary" universe over to Leibniz "contingent/not-necessary" universe as our fundamental blueprint of the universe. This includes Leibniz calculus vs Newton calculus. Anywhere Leibniz and Newton thought different. All of it. Full swap. Gottfried Leibniz "contingent/not-necessary" universe just lacked 2022 quantum physics verbiage (just match up definitions) and Hamilton's 4D quaternion algebra (created 200 years after Leibniz died). Lastly, our first number is NOT 1. It's 0. Our ten numbers are 0, 1, 2, 3,...9 ✅. Our ten dimensions are 0D, 1D, 2D, 3D,...9D ✅. Ask someone to begin counting. I bet they begin with 1. 1 is not the beginning. 0 is the beginning. 1D is a Line; two points; physical; matter; contingent. 0D is a (point); exact location only; no spatial extension; zero size; necessary. Examples: What is another word for quark? fundamental particle, elementary particle. Do quarks take up space? Its defining feature is that it lacks spatial extension; being dimensionless, it does not take up space. "0D (point)" How fast do quarks move? the speed of light What is an elementary particle example? " " -my insert Elementary particles include quarks "0D (point)" (the constituents of protons and neutrons), leptons "1D line" (electrons, muons, taus, and neutrinos), gauge bosons "2D plane" (photons, gluons, and W and Z bosons) and the Higgs boson "3D volume". What is the size of an elementary particle? The elementary particles are not believed to have any size at all. As currently understood they are zero size points. Protons and neutrons (and all hadrons) are about 10−15m. Humanity has a ToE right now.

Not for something that is still just a theory

I would rather have listened to a qualified sceptic, preferably one from outside this self confirming society, where everybody pat each other on the shoulder. The risk is that intellectual inbreeding will prevent any doubt to ever raise within this society.

Neutron attraction = Gravity

I wish scientists would just get back to being scientists.I was under the impression that scientists wanted to be scientists because they genuinely enjoy making new discoveries . I find it extremely disappointing that the majority of scientists are far more concerned with impressing their peers ,too busy talking smack and belittling each other. Instead of enjoying the journey one will go on , when attempting to making new discoveries! Imagine the discoveries that scientists have missed out on discovering.. All because they are too fearful of what their peers might think of them ! scientists today, are not what they used to be. scientists no longer make progress. They instead get stuck , to only regress! many of them regressing , all because they are chasing the nobel prize! maybe they would get the opportunity to win such a prize if they dared to go where no other scientist has gone before . either way please stop whining about those who have won it! would you scientists feel better if there were more prizes you could try to win?

@jellymop

Жыл бұрын

Pressure from the paradigm, from the establishment, the big money investors. Imagine if a discovery, and there’s evidence there is, that throws out the mainstream consensus and institution of ancient equation history and who built what. Imagine everything built on the current mainstream understanding at risk of being washed away and re-thought. All those institutions and projects and tourism would be in danger of shutting down or changing drastically and there will be massive resistance against that.

The dark matter that causes the force of gravity gives mass back to the reactions in a particle collider. The true strong force is between quarks and the sterile electron neutrinos of space. Black holes are made of nothing but quarks and use dark matter as their catalyst. The big bang was our universe turning itself into a gargantuan particle collider that turned maximum entropy matter into quark plasma shrapnel that are the galaxies we see expanding today. Quark plasma sustains itself because the density and pressure of space is able to keep the quarks apart indefinitely. As a result, the strong force ejects the neutrinos out of the reaction as the most powerful electromagnetic radiation in the universe which is gamma rays. That's where all the cosmic and gamma rays come from that scientists cannot explain because the Big Bang theory states that nothing can leave a black hole. Black holes do not emit optical light because all they emit are gamma rays. Gravity has nothing to do with any energy production in our universe. Gravity doesn't create energy, energy creates gravity. Science needs a paradigm shift and that discovery will entail redefining what happened 13.8 billion years ago. Everything already existed when the Big Bang happened following the first law of thermodynamics. Everything has cooled from the quark plasma state since then following the second law. Even though Einstein stated Lemaitres assumption was "abominable" as far as physics go, he still accepted the theory. Unfortunately, the Big Bang theory is the cause for every problem that exists in physics and astrophysics. Black holes create all the naturally occurring elements all by themselves from the outside of the mass inward. First, the quarks and neutrinos fuse to create the first neutrons, and optical light, the mass will possess. Once enough neutrons have congregated on the surface, they begin decaying to the first hydrogen the mass will possess. The constantly forming neutrons then fuse with the hydrogen to form the first helium the mass will possess using the beta minus decay reaction. This process continues creating heavier elements making the star darker until the light is extinguished and a surface forms. This is when the atmosphere of lighter elements is allowed to develop. We live on an ex-black hole. I know this sounds ridiculous but when the Big Bang theory is considered a fact, anything else will sound wrong. Unfortunately, that is the way paradigm shifts have always worked. I follow all the laws of physics with my theory. The big bang theory follows none of them. That is why it is unable to explain so much.

Re: 1:11, Any honor in the name of the british empire is not worth mentioning, reflecting upon their atrocities. What is there to celebrate about the looting, pillaging of India, Africa and many other places as well as the starvation and wanton killings of millions of Black and Brown people? To victims of the britsh empire this is the equivalent of naming an honor in the name of n*zi germany. ~Signed, A victim of the british empire

@1:01:00 Neither the current ("Run 3") nor the next (HL-LHC "Run 4" and onward) campaign of the LHC is expected to present substantial new experimental reach in terms of higgs self-interaction, unfortunately. With the full (multi-decade) dataset of about 3000 fb^-1, we can expect: * Higgs Mass: Could be measured with error of 10-20 MeV, where the width of the SM Higgs is about 4 MeV. * Higgs to ___: Take 10% uncertainty measurements down to 1%. * Higgs + Higgs to ___: Down from unresolvable 50% uncertainty. With 3000 fb^-1, 4 sigma observation of occurrence. cds.cern.ch/record/2808840/files/ATL-PHYS-SLIDE-2022-095.pdf

@hyperduality2838

Жыл бұрын

Bosons are dual to Fermions -- atomic duality! Higgs Bosons are dual to Higgs Fermions (mass). Where are the Higgs Fermions? Symmetry breaking:- Symmetry is dual to anti-symmetry. Time translation symmetry is dual to space translation symmetry. Time symmetry is dual to time asymmetry (entropy) - time duality. Space is dual to time -- Einstein. The spin statistics theorem:- Symmetric wave functions (Bosons, waves) are dual to anti-symmetric wave functions (Fermions, particles) -- wave/particle or quantum duality. Bosons are dual to Fermions -- atomic duality. The Higgs field should be called the Higgs duality field, symmetry breaking is dual. Ellipsoids are dual to hyperboloids -- Linear algebra, matrices -- Gilbert Strang. Energy is dual to mass -- Einstein. Gravitation is equivalent or dual (isomorphic) to acceleration -- Einstein's happiest thought, the principle of equivalence (duality). Mass is a by-product of conserving duality! Action is dual to reaction -- Sir Isaac Newton (the duality of force). Attraction is dual to repulsion, push is dual to pull -- forces & hence energy are dual. Symmetry breaking conserves duality. "Always two there are" -- Yoda. Energy is duality, duality is energy -- Generalized duality, if energy is being conserved then duality is being conserved -- the 5th law of thermodynamics! Dark energy is dual to dark matter -- Janus holes/points, Julian Barbour, physicist. Universe or mono-verse is dual to multiverse. The big bang is a negative curvature singularity -- non null homotopic or dual.