A very simple example, illustrating the Difference Principle. Screencast by Toby Handfield
Жүктеу.....
Пікірлер: 23
@IAmDatYoungBull9 жыл бұрын
Helping me out on my Intro to Ethics final, homie. You the real MVP.
@09materialistic
5 жыл бұрын
IAmDatYoungBull here I go lol
@jonathandowning1828 Жыл бұрын
This is the first time I've understood this properly! Thank you!
@johnharvey14285 жыл бұрын
Scratching my head reading Rawls, then watch this video and it’s clear!! Thank you 🙏
@vlad_o_sh4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the informative video. If I could add something to the understanding of the Difference Principle: One should also consider a situation, where the less privileged get a little more of the shared goods while all the other loose a substantial part of those goods. This would, for Rawls, still be a more just situation.
@dillonwatt6732
3 жыл бұрын
question for you (you seem smart) in the difference principle what is being distributed is it money??
@lunacatt
2 жыл бұрын
That is incorrect because if the "all others" suffered a "substantial loss", the "all others" will become (or is actually) the disadvantaged group (in the unequal distribution).
@tomvose81596 жыл бұрын
Best video I've seen explaining this! Thanks so much
@BombAdvice6 жыл бұрын
Good job! Thanks for putting it in terms I can understand!
@madarovidius17757 жыл бұрын
very well ilustrated, thank you!
@adrianaaguillen8 жыл бұрын
easy to understand! THANK YOU
@lyslexic6 жыл бұрын
Thanks Buddy, Helped me loads! :)
@ludovicgeldhof9165 жыл бұрын
Well explained, thanks!
@ingersollprojects76364 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the help
@AdityaKumar-zk6xv3 жыл бұрын
Amazing 👏 explanation
@seanmillea34757 жыл бұрын
Perfect
@conphzhi8 жыл бұрын
thanks!
@RAHULYADAV62356627 жыл бұрын
great
@ingridlopez8633 Жыл бұрын
thanks
@estesgaming98514 жыл бұрын
im so confuse so it does mean that this principles are merely focuses to the less privileges ?
@Nemanoid6 жыл бұрын
but why can we say that if everyone is equal, the distribution would be so low? It would be distributed proportionally and so it is higher, no?
@joecherfan2547
5 жыл бұрын
If there is no incentive to work hard (IE inequality in distribution) then there is no incentive to create more wealth which would later be redistributed in some way or another (usually in the form of tax or welfare) to the least well-off group.
@KawishSuiii
4 жыл бұрын
@@joecherfan2547 Thanks, this was needed for my assignment.
Пікірлер: 23
Helping me out on my Intro to Ethics final, homie. You the real MVP.
@09materialistic
5 жыл бұрын
IAmDatYoungBull here I go lol
This is the first time I've understood this properly! Thank you!
Scratching my head reading Rawls, then watch this video and it’s clear!! Thank you 🙏
Thanks for the informative video. If I could add something to the understanding of the Difference Principle: One should also consider a situation, where the less privileged get a little more of the shared goods while all the other loose a substantial part of those goods. This would, for Rawls, still be a more just situation.
@dillonwatt6732
3 жыл бұрын
question for you (you seem smart) in the difference principle what is being distributed is it money??
@lunacatt
2 жыл бұрын
That is incorrect because if the "all others" suffered a "substantial loss", the "all others" will become (or is actually) the disadvantaged group (in the unequal distribution).
Best video I've seen explaining this! Thanks so much
Good job! Thanks for putting it in terms I can understand!
very well ilustrated, thank you!
easy to understand! THANK YOU
Thanks Buddy, Helped me loads! :)
Well explained, thanks!
Thank you for the help
Amazing 👏 explanation
Perfect
thanks!
great
thanks
im so confuse so it does mean that this principles are merely focuses to the less privileges ?
but why can we say that if everyone is equal, the distribution would be so low? It would be distributed proportionally and so it is higher, no?
@joecherfan2547
5 жыл бұрын
If there is no incentive to work hard (IE inequality in distribution) then there is no incentive to create more wealth which would later be redistributed in some way or another (usually in the form of tax or welfare) to the least well-off group.
@KawishSuiii
4 жыл бұрын
@@joecherfan2547 Thanks, this was needed for my assignment.