200 years from now I hope people remember Federer like they remember Beethoven.

@Kiwippy

3 жыл бұрын

very different comparison and nowhere near the same level of fame.

@meshalsinnen5917

3 жыл бұрын

They won't.

@Jejdjejbfjf

3 жыл бұрын

@@meshalsinnen5917 yeah yeah fortune teller

@benjaminrosen5342

3 жыл бұрын

He is a maestro all the same

@meshalsinnen5917

3 жыл бұрын

@@Jejdjejbfjf different things - you must be dense not to recognize it. Federer is still the most technically complete and perhaps most graceful player of all time.

I’m Spanish, and I adore Rafa… but I have to admit that when Roger was at his top level, that was the best tennis that has been ever played. We miss him so much!!!

@galetinm

Жыл бұрын

Prettiest. Not best. Tennis is not a beauty contest. Results dictate what is best. Rafa was destroying him since he arrived on tour. Novak surpassed him too.

@johnc735

Жыл бұрын

@@galetinm Destroying him on clay only. Federer 14-10 on hard and grass.

@leeroy2673

Жыл бұрын

@@johnc735 stop lying u fake stats bum. Djoko leads 3-1 in grass and 20-18 in hard, and clay is tied with 4-4

@kentkimura5

Жыл бұрын

WRONG

@thefun512

Жыл бұрын

As always the fans of mister toilet time talk about statistics .you will never change the truth that Djokovic is behind Federer and Nadal keeeep crying you dirty fanatic fans

Federer is somehow the living concept of tennis. Federer is THE tennis.

@TheKakarot_itachi

2 жыл бұрын

Nope. Nadal is THE Tennis.

@user-ir5to1od4u

2 жыл бұрын

@@TheKakarot_itachi Nope. Nasal is THE nose.

@eminakaratas11

2 жыл бұрын

@@TheKakarot_itachi Nope. Novak is THE tennis

@v-prorabillion8770

2 жыл бұрын

Nadal is your father

@rubenbrader3039

2 жыл бұрын

@@v-prorabillion8770 did he leave??

Djoker and Nadal will obviously have better résumés when it’s all said and done. But Roger at his prime is the highest level of tennis I have ever witnessed. His game is the epitome of a tennis player. Best combination of skill, athleticism, and grace.

@jibriel4200

Жыл бұрын

In terms of pure tennis skill alone no one matches what Federer has. However, Nadal and Djokovic's unbreakable mindset and Djokovic's athleticism is second to none. If federer had their mental fortitude he would've been in the 30s for GS titles easily

@IM-mw4zx

Жыл бұрын

Haha easy done against players like hewitt and philipousis

@mariosannino5441

Жыл бұрын

​@@IM-mw4zxActually Sampras, Agassi, Safin, Del Potro, Murray, ecc. Don't worry Nadal and Djoko will be always remembered as better mentally and better winners, but what they'll never achieve is his greatness. That's a fact.

@user-fq4oq9qv7b

Жыл бұрын

@@mariosannino5441 sorry man winning is everything when it's all said and done.

@mariosannino5441

Жыл бұрын

@@user-fq4oq9qv7b You don't understand a simple fact. GOAT means "Greatest of all time", not "the most successful". Is as simple as that, really. Novak and Rafa will be remembered as the most successful, Roger as the greatest. It's different.

This court was the fastest in years. No idea why they don't make court as fast anymore...😑

@CrysisOwnsHalo

2 жыл бұрын

Seems like everyone wants to watch the long, drawn-out, 35+ shot rallies that Nadal & Djokovic are famous for, for some ungodly reason why.

@60hertzproductions64

2 жыл бұрын

@@CrysisOwnsHalo Because they’re epic. Federer is an artist not a gladiator. Federer improved tennis but Nadal and Djokovic changed it.

@z1az285

2 жыл бұрын

This court was not "fast". It was medium pace at best. The speed was definitely ramped up from 2019 onwards.

@Honkawsuzyamal

2 жыл бұрын

@@CrysisOwnsHalo I couldn't agree more. So called 'fans' want quantity over quality. I no longer enjoy watching tennis because of the drawn out rallies. This has gone too far when even Ken Rosewall says the rallies are too long

@vighneshramesh2569

2 жыл бұрын

Cuz nadal wouldn’t win if they made the courts faster

Federer was capable of reaching a kind of level that no one ever can or ever will and those were the days he was unbeatable and beat even nole and Nadal. But his flaw was he couldn't sustain that level consistently and that's why he lost often to his great rivals. But Federer at his best was the best player to ever play no doubt in that

@seankeegan8285

9 ай бұрын

as in most sports, best offense beats the best defense. Some days federer just saw the ball too well and most good looks he'd get were winners xD loved watching him grow up, contributed to my lack of consistency all the time playing tennis as I'll always just try to blast a forehand winner

@springfield03sniper

8 ай бұрын

Federer raised the bar for future generations

@cpblnc1

6 ай бұрын

24-20

@evakovacs5340

6 ай бұрын

Actually Federer was very consistent, especially in his prime years. He had Nadal and Djokovic to contend with among other rivals, and he was unbroken in his ranking of No. ! far longer than anyone else. He was the one who truly raised the standards, getting to twenty GS titles. The others chased him for years.

never seen a top spin dropshot before wow! (5:40)

@PBRCN-br5sv

3 ай бұрын

read your comment and thought you wre mistaken. THEN saw it. 😮

@angerisdiscipline3913

19 күн бұрын

Its called a misshit

@vuvuzelaasesina7690

19 күн бұрын

@@angerisdiscipline3913 you would know

Man, the title of the video was absolutely NOT clickbait !

Federer's footwork was amazing.

@cpblnc1

6 ай бұрын

Tennis is not running. 24 and counting - 20 and no more counting. GOAT vs swiss fraud

@SANJUKUTTAN826

4 ай бұрын

​​Shut up douchebag 🤬..Nole might win even 30 GS but still he can't match the ' PRIME FEDERER who played in God Mode ' 🔥🤜😏😏​@@cpblnc1

@big-wood196

15 күн бұрын

@@cpblnc1you really aren’t a tennis fan 🤡😂

@JB-bc9nm

15 күн бұрын

@@cpblnc1 Come on man! What reality are you in? Swiss fraud? Really?

When I wasn't picking my jaw up from the awesome shots, I was shaking my head in sheer disbelief. There are days when RF can just do no wrong. Announcer: Perfection is hard to achieve. Thomas A. Edison: Genius is 1% inspiration and 99% perspiration.

@renoplayz842

Жыл бұрын

🤓🤓🤓

@tipi5953

Жыл бұрын

perspiration..?

@evakovacs5340

11 ай бұрын

Well said. Tennis is about winning, but to a great extent it is about how the game is played/

Federer activating GOD MODE 3-1 down in the second set

@qg_getoofed1802

2 жыл бұрын

3-0 down*

Always fascinating watching these two play each other. Mightn't be obvious, but even here it's possible to see how Novak was able to have a greater Grand Slam record through 2010-19 than Federer. When Roger is moving and striking the ball as he was here, he is close to unplayable. Even after that 6-1 drubbing, however, Novak broke him at the start of the second. Eventually, all it takes is for Roger to be a half-step slower, for him to drop his shots closer to the service line than the back of the court and with less penetration, and then Novak's absurd defensive skills wear Roger down. 2019 Wimbledon is a great example. Roger played the better tennis for probably 95% of the match yet still lost, with Novak's brick wall proving too strong when it mattered. Heartbreak for Roger, remarkable for Novak. I will always be of the opinion that, seen at their peaks, Roger is the most complete all-court player ever to have played professionally. He's also far and away for me the most fascinating and enjoyable to watch, likely because he IS capable of all sorts of variations and can do some truly ridiculous things while being graceful and making it look effortless. I have great respect for Novak and Rafa, of course, but it's Roger in full flight I'd want to use were I asked to show someone who's never seen tennis played what the game can look like at its best. Novak's Grand Slam record of 2010-2019 is as good as Roger's 2000-2009, if not a fraction better (can't remember the numbers). I have loads of respect for his achievements. Rafa is of course in another universe when it comes to clay. Hard to imagine anyone topping THAT particular record. As of 2022 the three of them have a combined 61 GS titles. That's 15 YEARS of ALL the GS being won by one of the three. Astounding. Am old enough to have grown up watching Lendl, Mac, Agassi, Sampras etc. Never thought I'd see ONE player with a record of 20 GS titles, let alone THREE of them, together spanning some 20 years.

@steeltrap3800

2 жыл бұрын

@@JohnDavidDunlap Thanks. They're both great players, absurdly so. Whichever someone prefers will always be a matter of personal taste as their records, and of course Nadal's, are all so extreme it's almost pointless trying to decide which one is "greater" because that necessarily must depend on how you define it. Cheers

@seanhillery1231

Жыл бұрын

@@JohnDavidDunlap also, didn’t Federer have like 14 slams while Novak only had one?

@YouBetterBeYou

Жыл бұрын

@@JohnDavidDunlap And they slowed the courts/balls. Federer adapted as good as he can and its amazing that he remained an absolute top player in a practically different sport! I am not sure Djokovic could adapt his style to be as successful on these faster courts of Federer's prime. In any case, while I agree with your "technical" analysis, I still think the biggest advantag of Djokovic is his mentality/clutchness especially on big points. Had Djokovic not been such an incredible mental champ in their on-court meetings, Federer would have easily taken 2-4 titles from him in their finals. That would put 4-8 GS gap between them. Alas, the mentality and deliver their best under pressure is the hallmark of champions. And Novak has the edge in that aspect without a doubt.

@tomasdelcampo2

Жыл бұрын

in the 2019 wimbledon final djokovic was playing better a decent amount of the time though. Don't know where you got 95% from....

@YouBetterBeYou

Жыл бұрын

@@tomasdelcampo2 Because you could see when you watched and Federer was statistically better in almost every aspect of the game other than Break/Matchpoint conversion.

This Federer can go for at least 2 more grand slams for sure!

@MrPernell27

2 жыл бұрын

Yea but this Federer is no more. He just got off crutches a month ago and he’s closer to 41 than 40

@theaustrianart-teacher8787

Жыл бұрын

This federer would dominâte tennis riggt now

@mambi74

9 ай бұрын

@@theaustrianart-teacher8787 40-15 trilogy.. that's Federer, then or now.

Roger federer ist der der Spieler mit dem besten schlagrepertuar den ich jemals gesehen habe!!!!!! Er ist und bleibt eine Legende in und ausserhalb des Tennis Platz Er hat soviel für den Sport gemacht. Einer der ganz grossen Persönlichkeiten unserer Zeit🎾🇨🇭✌️

When Rog was young. I'm convinced that if it was possible to give Roger an elixer of youth and it took him back to when he was 30, he'd still be # 1 and would be eating Djokovic's lunch.

@NikolaSimetic

4 жыл бұрын

Hahahahha man Roger never can be better than Novak, age not matter, Nole is just better and No1

@onionhater7994

4 жыл бұрын

Mystic Dzoni if you think that you clearly understand nothing about tennis. Blinded fanboy...

@chiragmittal3313

4 жыл бұрын

some people say Roger is weak era champion, but they don't know that his domination made them to think so.

@onionhater7994

4 жыл бұрын

CHIRAG MITTAL exactly. Djokovic might overtake grand slam wise but only cause he is 5 Years younger than Roger. If these guys had started in the same years playing professional there would be absolutely no doubt that Federer is THE goat!

@MrCalmwaters112

4 жыл бұрын

Ya, right.

On his day the greatest ever. Off his day still one of the best ever, formidable. I watched this match live. Sometimes he honestly looked possessed especially in this game.

@purple9rain

Жыл бұрын

Wow amazing! I think rather not possessed but the divine gift running through him. 😃

@cpblnc1

6 ай бұрын

On their day against clowns everyone is the best ever.

@nimascolari1508

6 ай бұрын

@@cpblnc1 yet, you everyday are a toxic paraiste.

This is why I think Roger from 2005-2007 would have battered Djokovic even in his prime. His ability to destroy an opponent when he is on his game is unmatched. He can't keep up defensively against Djokovic so most of the time he has to make a move in the rally, and Federer in his 30's is just simply not as good at ending points quickly like he was in the early stages of his career. If you had Federer who could end a defensive rally in the blink of an eye with how disgustingly consistent his forehand was, facing off against 2011 or 2015 Djokovic, my money would be on Federer.

@rm1626

2 жыл бұрын

I actually think Fed's 2017 game was better suited to combat Djoker's prime...in Djoker's prime he hit more deep balls, better serve, closer to sidelines, etc...2017 ultra offense fed prob better

@patrickw9706

2 жыл бұрын

Fed already lost to Djoker in 2007.

@IzakD8

2 жыл бұрын

@@patrickw9706 Okay? Djokovic also lost to Federer in 2011. The point isn't that he would win 10/10 matches. The point is he is the better player.

@peolfpetler8500

2 жыл бұрын

Stop posting nonsense. Yes Federer really didn't give Djokovic any chance to recover in this match but my gosh 2005-2007 Fed would dominate Djokovic? Everyone who's a little bit objective knows that Federer raised he's game even higher from 2010-2017 at least at some points. Federer from 2005-2007 didn't really have anyone who could stand against him (except Rafa). Federer would probably turn out different if everyone of the big three started playing at the same time. But that's all a IF as is your comment we will never know and reallty is different Novak accomplished more than Federer in the toughest era of tennis ever. And please stop saying age is a problem Novak and Rafa are destroying younger generations so that's out of question.

@blake8820

2 жыл бұрын

@@peolfpetler8500 Well to be fair younger generations aren’t nearly as good as Federer in his prime so your point about Novak and Rafa destroying younger generations doesn’t really mean as much. This is coming from a Rafa fan

Every time Djokovic laughs to himself he's questioning if he's facing a human being or not

@prash175

Жыл бұрын

He was laughing at the crowd most of the time. Not Roger Federer. They were all clapping on unforced errors and double fault.

Nole was mentally on edge against Roger every match they played back then. The crowd, not knowing what to expect gamewise, the occasional misshit, the net onslaught - it was messing with his head. He realised he had to take matters into his own hands and started upping the aggression from the baseline later on which limited Rogers creativity and messed with his timing from 2011 on. Also his serve got way better. Roger always managed to overrun Nole on a couple of occaisions through the year (12/14/15), but the bigger matches went noles way because he tipped the odds ever so slightly in his favour that it was enough to prevail under the most pressure and over a longer time

@keranseunarine4274

2 жыл бұрын

Its not cuz djokovic has any skill of his own or is just better at all

@tvtotalforever

2 жыл бұрын

@@keranseunarine4274 must be beautiful when everything is that easy

@lgoler

2 жыл бұрын

and he’s 6 years younger.

@andrewbradley3305

Жыл бұрын

Also Federer got older

@djk5336

11 ай бұрын

Hate to admit but it's just sheer luck that Djokovic won in the later years. Federer just lost to himself

You see Federer playing, you think: "Tennis is easy!", but for mortals, it's a nightmare!!!

Djokovic knew that he couldn't do anything. It's like trying to stop a river...Federer was flawless almost spiritual

@SSSSASAX

10 ай бұрын

You must be joking. Djoko is goat.

@andreaho

10 ай бұрын

@@SSSSASAX goat is just an animal that is fond of grass.

@Bobby.546

9 ай бұрын

@@SSSSASAXaverage butthurt Djokovic fan

@SSSSASAX

9 ай бұрын

@@andreaho If you hadn't told me, I wouldn't have known.

Djokovic walks off a beaten man. It wasn't a contact lens problem this time it was a Roger Federer problem! Lol. Djokovic will definitely get more slams than Federer and Nadal. However, Federer will always be remembered as the genius he is.

@my8osprive

2 жыл бұрын

Djokovic got half his GS's after Fed turned 35+ years old. Now is a weak era of tennis so Nole will probably indeed win some more GS.

@initialise21

2 жыл бұрын

@@my8osprive u are n word. Federer weak era champ

@captainrogercall5742

2 жыл бұрын

@@my8osprive well is this sarcasm that this era is weak? Because anyone literally anyone a child to tennis analyst will say Fed's era is weaker than Nole and Rafa's.

@neverlands8403

2 жыл бұрын

@@captainrogercall5742 this is strongest era, you know that tennis players now are much better than before, Novak,Nadal and federer are goat and there are many other great players right now

@my8osprive

2 жыл бұрын

@@captainrogercall5742 Facts are facts. Nole got half his GS after Roger turned 35+ years old. Fed's era started in 2004. Nadal was 18 then (quite formidable), and Nole 17. But Fed had Hewitt, Roddick, Nalbandian, Safin, Agassi (34 years old at 2004) to fight against. So no... it wasn't a weak era then. Novak had benefited from a weak era the last 3-4 years with Murray, Nadal and Fed injuries (plus age), etc.

Some day's he played like his career peek time like 2003/4/5/6 after 30's also...Gretest Of All Time...We Love U Federer Miss U In Tennis Court...Legend..FED EX

Now Djokovic is so different, so perfect. You cannot know your real potential unless you work hard with consistency.

Well if he played every match like this he would've been invincible (Federrer)

When Roger is playing Tennis is the beautiful game

This had to be over a decade ago! Wow how things have changed!

Interestingly the world tour finals a couple of years back I think it was 2019 was the first time Federer had beaten Novak anywhere since 2015 incidentally I believe he defeated Novak in the round robin stage but lost in the finals , Federer beat him again there four years later other than that it’s been very slim pickings. He seems to have completely transformed the Nadal rivalry through I think winning like 7 of the last 8 meetings his only defeat coming on the clay .

@AlainDessaints

7 ай бұрын

No. Djokovic wears Tacchini until 2012 whennhevchanges to Uniqlo for 5 years. This was in 2010 in London.

federer is nuts. its like he wills the direction of the ball last minute

I think We have Three Mozarts in sports: Waldner in table tennis. Messi in football. Federer in tennis.

@Yessirz

2 жыл бұрын

Table tennis 😂😂😂😂😂

@ijump-bounce2283

2 жыл бұрын

@@Yessirz Yes this is a real sport but you might not have seen pro players i guess

@Yessirz

2 жыл бұрын

@@ijump-bounce2283 Not as competitive as football and tennis. Way less athletes competing = less competition. Maths.

@ijump-bounce2283

2 жыл бұрын

@@Yessirz Not as competitive ? Oh yeah nice maths tho .. bro, your maths have nothing to do with the fact Waldner is a mozart of his sport and go ahead, talk about the less competitive aspect when China's players start playing at 2-3 years old. Literally awful comment aha

@Yessirz

2 жыл бұрын

@@ijump-bounce2283 Mozart competed with millions of pianists around the world. The competition isn’t the same scale in table tennis. Sorry.

for style, grace and composure on the court, RF = GOAT IMHO

Fluid in motion. Incredible

Federer, on l'aime pour plusieurs choses: Il joue toujours l'attaque. Il reste jamais au fond en attendant. Il est un modèle de belle âme, à l'opposé d'un Becker qui n'a jamais ni contrôlé son bas ventre, ni ses millions. En synthèse, Federer n'a jamais dit de chose inacceptable. Et il a ainsi toujours su garder une aura immaculée. Le temps passera. Des autres viendront et batteront ses records. Mais pour retrouver qqun de pareil, on peut juste attendre 200 ans. 🐐🥎💨

The way you can tell who is the GOAT, is when you see Federer at his top form. He would annihilate anyone. Yes, his style is not the most effective, this is why he has a bit less titles now, but the way he plays is unmatched and unreal and unbeatable when he has a good day.

@janparchanski9242

10 ай бұрын

His style is not the most effective? I disagree.

@seankeegan8285

9 ай бұрын

@@janparchanski9242 i agree, his style is not most effective, but has the highest ceiling as if he's playing his best the other opponent doesn't get to play the game. Nadal and Djokovic will grind you down whereas Federer would just blow you off the court. It wouldn't feel like you were apart of the match, it's just him practicing hitting corners xD Kyrgios said it best when asked who he hates playing the most out of the big 3, he said something like "nadal and djokovic at least make you feel like you're apart of a battle, whereas federer just makes you not wanna play the match anymore"

Hearing Djokovic saying “enough” with Federer across the net… best medicine to a bad day.

this match is a good example of how when Fed’s creativity flows free, it’s like a videogame on easy.

If hard and grass courts weren’t slowed down after the Sampras era. Federer would be more dominant against top defensive returners in the top 4.

@squidjames7735

Жыл бұрын

oh boy!

@mariosannino5441

Жыл бұрын

Facts. 38 years old fighting against a 32 years old prime and almost winning on one of the slowest Wimbledon ever...against the best athlete of modern tennis... that just shows how talented he is.

@squidjames7735

Жыл бұрын

@@mariosannino5441 .. . 40-15 choke

@mariosannino5441

Жыл бұрын

@@squidjames7735 i do not like long rallies. I like genius, the ability to take a point doing something that 99% of people would not even think. If you like long rallies, endurance and stamina, Im fine with that. That is even more efficient nowadays. But first study, know who McEnroe, Edberg, Lendl, Laver were then we start talking about tennis.

@sidharthicon6300

Жыл бұрын

​​@@squidjames7735 yeah like Djoker choke in RG against Rafa 🤣🤣🤣🤣

One thing is for sure. Roger at his best kills Nole and Rafa at his best. He would win bagels against them while I don't recall RF ever suffering a bagel set against these two.

@tejaswinithukral6534

2 жыл бұрын

French open 2008. Nadal bageled his ass. French Open 2020 Nadal Bageled Djokovic. Italian Open 2019 also Nadal Bageled Djokovic.

@djjr9803

2 жыл бұрын

@@tejaswinithukral6534 Well. Thanks for the education but why the strong language ? Here are the facts: Federer bageled Nadal's ass 3 times (2006 Wimbledon final, 2007 Hamburg final, 2011 World Tour finals). Federer also bageled Djokovic once in the 2012 Cincinatti Masters while Nadal bageled Djokovic 2 times (2019 Italian Masters and 2020 French Open). On the other hand, Djokovic never bageled any of them. So, clearly, Federer leads the pack with 4:1 bagels served and received. How about that ?

Kids this is why Roger Federer is the King of Tennis

Wow, just wow … so focused, so effortlessly.

Imagine seeing yourself in the shoes of any tennis player playing against Federer, that no matter what you do you had no chance of winning. The beauty of His Majesty Federer's tennis is truly insane

@tanjadenic4606

2 жыл бұрын

lol absolutely you have chance to win , in 50 matches fed lost more to Nole than Nole to him , thats far from what you said

@starsgameplaytroughcuvi9497

2 жыл бұрын

@@tanjadenic4606 i understand that. But i am talking in a perspective of a huge fan of Roger Federer

@madlad6022

2 жыл бұрын

@@tanjadenic4606 you saying you gonna beat him?

@kontsombos7540

2 жыл бұрын

Keep on dreaming ....................

@funblogst.v2411

2 жыл бұрын

@@tanjadenic4606 fedrer is not in his prime.. He is older than him.. He lost his peak but still beat him... This is fedrer

People says peak Federer was 2004-2006. For me was 2009-2011. His serve, BH, slice, drop shot and FH are better. He only not won more titles in this period because Nadal and Djoko. This is the truth.

@franciscoinfante7463

2 жыл бұрын

Get out 2007? Ridiculous

@flicks1994

2 жыл бұрын

So not winning a slam in 2011 translates to peak Federer?

@GabrielMedeiros

2 жыл бұрын

@@flicks1994 he lost to peak Djokovic in AO and USO (he had 2 match points here). Defeat peak Djokovic in RG and lost to Nadal in final. So, again, he doesn't won more titles because Nadal and Djoko. This is a stronger tese than simply says he dont won a GS in such a year.

@flicks1994

2 жыл бұрын

@@GabrielMedeiros a loss's is a loss and the titles speak for themselves in 2004-2007

@GabrielMedeiros

2 жыл бұрын

@@flicks1994 ok. Great logic.

The video should be titled: "Best Fed Fan Clip to Cope with Djokovic's Overtaking" Federer really did have awesome grace in his game. Not so much in his losses to Djokovic. And a lot of his fans show the same trait.

Djokovic is a great player! But Federer is as many of you have already said and in Fognini’s words “Roger is the tennis” or sum like that.

@mikemoggerson6651

2 жыл бұрын

But eventually people will stop saying that, as he has already been passed by Nadal and Djokovic in most statistics. People only said this when Federer WAS king. We’ll see if in 10 year Novak and Nadal have 23+ slams if they’ll still say this..

@PedroJ1944

2 жыл бұрын

@@mikemoggerson6651 Since 2003 when Federer won his first GS and Djokovic and Nadal were pros, Federer reached 20 GS first.Since 2005 missed 10 GS tournaments. Djokovic was absent once in 2017 in US Open and 2022 because was not vaccinated. Nadal was absent 9 times since 2005. Federer is 5 years older than Nadal and beat him 6 times on the last 7 encounters. In 2019 in Wimbledon beat Nadal and lost to Djokovic. But had 14 more points, more winners, more aces, dominated the long rallies. Lost the match but showed who was the better player, even when losing the match. Had defeated # 1 Medvedev 3-0 and since 2005 has accumulated more points with his GS, Finals, SF and QF than anybody in history. Not bad for a man that is older than the other 2 great players. Won a GS at 36. Not bad for an old man.

@mikemoggerson6651

2 жыл бұрын

@@PedroJ1944 the better play doesn’t lose the match. That’s not how it works. Federer has beat Djokovic like once or twice in an important match in the last 10 years.

@PedroJ1944

2 жыл бұрын

@@mikemoggerson6651 From 2010- 2020 Djokovic beat Federer 23 times and Federer won 14 matches. So for you a match is important when Djokovic wins? What about Federer beating him 9-4 from 2006- 2009? After a player is older is obvious that he will loose more often to a younger player. Also, tennis is one against the rest. Like I mentioned before Federer was out 10 times, injured while Djokovic was out only once, in 2017. So from 2005 to 2018 Federer reach 20 GS. playing against all the players. Djokovic reached 20 GS when Federer, Wawrinka. Thiem and Murray were out injured. When the best competitors were sick, NoVaX reaches 20 GS. And there was a pandemia and Wimbledon was suspended. Is easier to win when your most dangerous rivals are out sick. The truth is that the era of Federer Nadal and Djokecovid started in 2003 and Federer reach 20 GS slams earlier, in 2018. Roger also won a GS at age 36. When Djokecovid does the same at age 36 then we talk. And I hope he is allowed to play. I don’t want any excuses from ignorant fans.

@mikemoggerson6651

2 жыл бұрын

@@PedroJ1944 Federer won how many majors in his 30s? 4? Djokovic already has like 8 or 9 in his 30s lol. The key thing you fail to mention is that even though Federer was injured, he still would likely not have beat Djokovic EVEN if he was healthy. Notice how Federer won 3 slams (3 of his 4 slam wins in the last 11 years) in the time DJOKOVIC WAS ABSENT. In 2017 Djokovic was terrible and injured, and same with early 2018. You think it’s fluke that Federer won in those years? The only time Federer ever beat Djokovic in a grand slam final was in 2007, when Djokovic was 20 lol. You can’t deny that Djokovic has absolutely destroyed Federer in big matches over their career. Even you would admit that, I’m sure. Djokovic has beat him in four or five major finals if I recall correctly. In fact, the only important match I remember Federer beating Djokovic was in the French Open 2011. Fed was 29 and Djokovic 23, and Djokovic would go on to win 3/4 majors that year and would beat Nadal and Fed 9/10 matches they played (with that loss to Fed the exception). Outside of that, I literally cannot recall Federer beating Djokovic in a major. I hear all these excuses about Age, but somehow Fed and Nadal fans talk about 2006-2010 when Djokovic was basically a kid who wasn’t even close to his prime. The difference is Federer and Nadal would’ve dominated the 2010s if it wasn’t for Djokovic. Djokovic would’ve maybe had 3 majors in his early career if not for Nadal or Fed.

And then Novak Djokovic mysteriously has spent the most weeks as world No. 1, a record total 361 weeks. Roger Federer has the record of 237 consecutive weeks at No. 1

@stealth2279

2 жыл бұрын

Must have missed him at the aussie open. Huh what happened there? 🤔

@bean8447

2 жыл бұрын

People talk all these stats and numbers - but tennis isn’t just a numbers game. The greatest players don’t hold all the records. They never won all the matches. Federer could’ve done so much more with the time he had. Djokovic did all that was possible - and still can win more majors. I don’t care if Nadal or Djokovic finish at 22, 23, it’s just a number. Federer embodies the grace and effortlessness of the game - Nadal shows the intensity, grit, and fighting spirit. Djokovic grew as a player to counter them as they slipped out of their primes. I’m not taking anything away from Djokovic. He is the greatest champion this sport will probably ever see. Federer is the greatest player, Nadal is the greatest fighter. They all stand as the goat, each in their own way. I won’t let a few match points or a few tiebreaks they played between them separate them. Mental part of the sport exists too, Federer never played his best when it was absolutely necessary - that’s what Djokovic does - that’s what champions do. Federer revolutionized the sport - and among mental blocks - injuries and flaws in his backhand (often blamed to racket head size) slowed him from what he was capable of. That’s why I admire Djokovic so much. He never has these problems - like he was too great to have them, and if he got them he only roared back stronger. I don’t care what you say or think. They are all the greatest - and arrogant fans pleading one or another players case will not convince me. It bothers me to see every time a player wins a slam - immediately their players are chanting goat. It happened with Nadal at AO 22 and with Djokovic last year. Why are we so focused on the slams, becoming so toxic with each other? Look at each players flaws, strengths and unique beauty of their game. They will always be equal

@tradingmetamorphosis7197

Жыл бұрын

@@bean8447 your subjective take. Numbers matter. They mattered when rogers had them, they matter now

@robj115

Жыл бұрын

You mean the Covid locked ranking, all the points Nole earns in 2019 was locked for 2 years, that's aprox. 100 weeks for him as #1

@NamTran-xc2ip

Жыл бұрын

@@bean8447could have, should have, grace, whatever you say. Djokovic has achieved more than Federer playing less tennis

Either player: is impossible destroy him. Roger: hold my beer

@FyFanNollan

4 жыл бұрын

And then Djokovic stands up again and destroy him

@rpwrld

4 жыл бұрын

Ema Ross It was 2009

@FyFanNollan

4 жыл бұрын

@@gunukulanaren2957 dude, chill

@bsrussian

3 жыл бұрын

@@rpwrld 2010

@rpwrld

3 жыл бұрын

@@bsrussian doesn't matter was like the same

Will miss his same so much . . . beautifully played . . . so sad he could play on for a while more if not for the knee setbacks . . . .😭💙 Which year was this match ?

What a demonstration of the art of tennis! Roger, I will miss you forever!

Fed is aging that’s why he’s very careful these days..aging is affecting his game which is natural. This clip is an example of how in age fed destroyed Novak

This was in 2010.. When Novak had only 1 grand slam and Federer had 16. A great lesson no doubt. But Djokovic has destroyed Federer many times.

@TheOfficialKIKI

Жыл бұрын

Ok.

@Bobby.546

9 ай бұрын

Djokovic getting salty as usual

Nadal fan but Federer prime is the best in the history in hard court and grass court. Ofc clay court is Nadal 😅😅😅

shit, that was quite something. Roger is like a sniper. So many precise and accurate shots... Unbelievable

I respect Nole and Nadal especially and everything they have achieved and brought to the game, however regardless of the stats Roger is easily the most talented player of all time and certainly the best to watch. It is similar to the Messi Ronaldo debate. Ronaldo has achieved more but those that know know Messi is the best. Roger is the GOAT!

@rishbahpandey8697

2 жыл бұрын

Ronaldo achieved more?? Lol😂. Ronaldo doesn't have biggest prize in football (world cup) forget world cup he doesn't even have a single goal at WC KO. Messi golden boots,ballon d'or, fifa best player,goal/assist per game all are better than cr7. Pele,messi are clear of cr7 .

When Roger was in prime of his career 2004 to 2010 - his win loss record against Novak reads 13-6 in all majors. When he was at his decline and Novak in his prime i.e from 2011 to 2015 the win loss record reads 16-9 in favour of Novak. Post 2015 Roger the great was just elongating his career for the records and I do not consider their match ups after that should be considered. So basically Roger at his best was winning 2 times more matches than Novak in their head to head. Novak started winning more once Roger was on the decline and had been playing at the highest level fir about a decade.

@jpcfernandes

11 ай бұрын

Longevity is only one aspect. When Federer stepped on the court at his very best, the feeling was that whatever guy on the other side, at whatever level of form, was just an extra on the "Federer Show". The score on the corner could be "Federer - Some other guy". With the notable exception of Nadal on clay.

@marekwichniarek268

11 ай бұрын

Are you both guys on drugs?

@aleks8283

10 ай бұрын

Sorry, but your record counting does resemble some very biased cherry picking. Federer had a hard time admitting being bested. Some of his fans seem to emulate him there.

@slavko798

10 ай бұрын

At his decline since 29 years old? Then Federer is not that good because having only 6 good years is not impressive

@aleks8283

10 ай бұрын

@@slavko798 the way this guy is counting, and not counting, the records to fit his narrative is a joke.

I could happily watch this match EVERY day.

There’s also a video titled “The Day Novak Djokovic totally destroys Roger Federer”

I have watched Federer Djokovic in Cincinnati 2012. I was even more shocked...

Nobody, I repeat, nobody, has a chance against Federer playing like this. He could probably have a good go at a double bagel against all the greats on his best day.

@monstermagnet3150

10 ай бұрын

No way against 2008 - 2010 Rafa oe 2011 Novak, it would be a hard battle

@Bobby.546

9 ай бұрын

@@monstermagnet3150Federer bageled nadal on clay in 2008

When Roger was Roger but after with his problem something unfortunatly changed.💕❤

@mass65spa

Ай бұрын

Già! E poi mi vengono a dire che Djokovic è stato il più forte di tutti i tempi, qui vediamo la differenza abissale che c'era con il grande Roger quando era al top.

People this is what is the difference between the A game of Roger and anyone else A game (Joker and Rafa).. When Rogers A game is there you can see the difference in class, joker considered to be the best indoor HC player was beaten hands down even when he was playing with his A game. Stats are going to be stats they are going to be deceiving, people who have seen Rogers game very closely and understand tennis will always consider him to be the GOAT.. the other two are just followers of his path trying to better his record by accumulating stats.. does that mean they are better than Roger you decide..

@pranavsreedhar1402

2 жыл бұрын

absouletly perfect statement!

@adityagouravdas929

2 жыл бұрын

Still 21>20 36>28 24>16 For Rafa And 37>28 27>23 360>310 In case of Djokovic.

@pranavsreedhar1402

2 жыл бұрын

@@adityagouravdas929 5+ years older in case of rafa and 6+ years older in case of Djokovic and he still beats them even at age 37. sounds like the younger ones are nowhere near the older brother. the older brother isn't even trying.

@monicac8823

2 жыл бұрын

@@pranavsreedhar1402 now it’s year difference.Why not talking year difference when they where 18 and Federer was 24 and prime.Then it was ok prime Federer to beat rookies.Now it’s not ok 32 years player to beat 38 old.

@pranavsreedhar1402

2 жыл бұрын

@@monicac8823 because you have more people who have become champions at teenage than after 30 or more. Also easier to beat some one older at 18 than it is to beat someone younger at 38. Physical age along with experience plays a big part...

The reason Djokovic is dominating tennis is because the greats are at the end of their careers and their isn’t anyone else on his level. Federer and Nadal will forever be the greatest players of all time.

@vultur311

Жыл бұрын

Ypu realise Novak is 35 now and still dominating.. get your numbers right. Novak and Nadal won 9 slams in their thirties.(still counting). Fed only 4..Dont fool yourself with numbers

@mrsumptuous9329

Жыл бұрын

@@vultur311 Novak in his prime isn’t near federer of Nadal levels in their primes. That’s what I meant. Federer and Nadal consistently dominated Djokovic in their prime

@vultur311

Жыл бұрын

@@mrsumptuous9329 yea, sure😂... Dont believe me, believe Rafa's own words towards Novak that "he didnt see Anyone playing at that level" after loss in Doha. Obviously his statement spreads on many occasions not jus that event

@mikiboki8591

Жыл бұрын

@@mrsumptuous9329 nice joke, novak won against federer when he was 20 years and not at his prime , then destroyed him at his prime , and nadal at his prime ( except RG)

@sportsview247

Жыл бұрын

Agreed! He won't retire if he keeps winning at the slams. It's up to the new players to knock him off his perch but frankly they are not good enough. Sad but true. Overall Alcaraz is probably his biggest threat and the best player to kick Novak into retirement.

he's legendary and will never be surpassed 🙌 #teamFederer

@monicac8823

2 жыл бұрын

He is already surpassed

@miguelfreitas8694

2 жыл бұрын

@@monicac8823 This girl is everywhere. She is the guardian of the sacred temple... She has something very important to protect... Sheee wil neeever giiive uuuup

@miguelfreitas8694

2 жыл бұрын

Exactly. His tennis is just unsurpassable. The best Federer is much much better then the best diokovic and the best nadal and the best whatever player.

@miso1995srb

2 жыл бұрын

And Roger best was when Novak wasnt there? 😁

@Lewythefly

9 ай бұрын

Roger king of the weak era. Novak had to claim GOAT status by beating Roger and Rafa

a few months later, at the final in Dubai, Djoko crushed Roger 6/3 6/3, he finally found the solution to his gluten problem working with Dr Cetojevic, from then on, Roger would not be as succesfull against him, Djoko went on to win 22 out of the next 31 meetings ! Roger was a more complete and talented player but Djoko has become the most focused and determined player ever to live ! GOAT !!

Bro that thumbnail ☠️ ☠️ ☠️

As long as the tennis game will be played, Federer will be the undisputed GOAT

@dusanvuksanovic2001

7 ай бұрын

Except he is not, Djokovic is.

Roger Federer was ART on the tennis court.

Quel bonheur ce jeu, quelle classe... RF the GOAT

The way people talk about Fed is the same way people talk about Michael Jordan. People refuse to say that MJ is the greatest basketball player because of how few trophies he has in comparison to LeBron. Federer molded the landscape of Modern Tennis. Both Fed and Jordan forced everyone around them to either get better or they were getting swept away, and that means more to the sport than trophies do.

@nemajabakic4546

11 ай бұрын

Five years ago everybody talked how Federer is greatest ever because he has most slams now when he doesn't you all change your story. BTW Jordan has more trophies then Lebron.

If they were at same age, Federer would always destroy Dfokovic thats for sure. Mozart would play piano watching the match….

@kontsombos7540

2 жыл бұрын

. if my aunt had balls, she'd be my uncle.

@normanosborn4372

Жыл бұрын

2008 Australian Open SF ? What happend there ? Or US open semi final ? Roger was too old ? 35 years old Novak wins slams against next gen and Roger ?

Федерер - гений тенниса, в своей лучшей форме он сильнее и Рафы и Джокера.

MEN MAY COME AND GO , RECORDS AND NUMBERS MAY CHANGE TIME TO TIME. BUT CLASS AND PERFECTION IS PERMANENT. FEDERER THE REAL CLASS AND ELEGANT PLAYER THAT TENNIS EVER PRODUCED. HATS OFF TO ROGER FEDEX FEDERER. YOU WON THE WHOLE TENNIS FANS HEART FOREVER !!!

É uma delicia assistir Federer. Faz MUITA falta.

@rafanj824

Жыл бұрын

Comecei a assitir tênis vendo a ultima partida dele em Wimbledon. Graças à Deus tem mt coisa aki no KZread.

Miami 2012,2014 &this match Federer destroyed him on his so called own surface.

@iceangel9006

4 жыл бұрын

Which year is this match?

@GMPranav

4 жыл бұрын

Hard court is defenitely Federer's den as well.

@kishenparekh9416

4 жыл бұрын

Djokovic has destroyed Federer in slam finals, when it matters most

@GMPranav

4 жыл бұрын

@@kishenparekh9416 by destroyed, you mean Federer being ahead in all the match stats and the nole winning just the tiebreakers? Props to nole for striking at the crucial time but I wouldn't call that "destroyed"

@kishenparekh9416

4 жыл бұрын

@@GMPranav 2015 Wimbledon final. 2016 AO semi final. 2015 US open final. 2011 AO semi final. 2008 AO semi final. 2012 RG semi final

Unbelievable what a shots 👏👏❤️

8:00 is the best hit ever in tennis history and federer was the only player to have it in his basic kit.

Djokovic gave Federer a worse beatdown at AO 2016!

@redwoodtrees7068

2 жыл бұрын

29 year old vs 35 year old fed. as he should.

@francescomasella8634

2 жыл бұрын

3 set to 1 and in the fourth Roger was at the same level

@NamTran-xc2ip

Жыл бұрын

@@redwoodtrees7068djokovic at 35 just won 3 slams beating younger opponents, keep making excuse

@redwoodtrees7068

Жыл бұрын

did he beat 29 year odl fed? no. so stop being dumb.

Ita a wonder Novak never stopped the game and get some Energy stuff like he did with Theim

@yurinator6380

2 жыл бұрын

NoVac

@NamTran-xc2ip

Жыл бұрын

Stay mad as djokovic ends up being the best

@Farmer2492

Жыл бұрын

@@NamTran-xc2ip his far from the best most disliked player in Tennis the crowds boo him

What's the song name at 4:56???

Didn't last very long novak simply got on top of him very quickly and just absolutely destroyed his confidence at wimbledon 2019 and the finger pointing lady hahaha

@blackyz.

11 ай бұрын

Doesn't matter lol, prime federer destroys prime nole

The Two G.O.A.Ts Of Tennis 🎾

Federer In GOD mode.

Didn't happen much, usually the other way around.

What year was this? Because I can't find it anywhere when I search it online.

Someone can win 25/30 Grand Slams but trust me Roger will remain the best of all time

@evakovacs5340

Жыл бұрын

Absolutely agree with you. No one has ever played at the level Federer has.

@NamTran-xc2ip

Жыл бұрын

@@evakovacs5340I agree, there are 2 players that didnt play at the level Federer has, they surpassed that level

@evakovacs5340

Жыл бұрын

Quality of play along with success is what matters. It is unmistakable. There are a lot of good players, then there are excellent players, then there are those who go beyond.

@SumboodyNao

Жыл бұрын

Novak is WAYYYYYAUU better than deferer bro

@Don-vx4os

11 ай бұрын

Lol if he was the best than why couldn’t he beat Novak while being up 2 set poinrs in 3 diffrner grand slams LOL

sadly R F lost so many mental battle against N D. N D is a master of mental game. Sadly RF mental vulnerabity hurt him a alot through out of his career. Otherwise R F would habe won 25 to 30 G S by now

Djokovic is unique in his longevity This, along with his mental fortitude, has allowed him to amass all the records. But you have to remember that before the big three, it was almost unheard of for a tennis player to be playing at such a high level after 30. Federer's age caught up with him quicker than Djokovic's, but you could say the same about almost any other player in history. Yes, Federer had a long career and was still in the mix in his later years, but you never felt like it was "peak Federer." Also, the game slowed down during his tenure making his style of play slightly less effective, while at the same time improving the effectiveness of Djokovic and Nadal. I don't think Federer was as mentally tough as the other 2 guys. He was just so talented and so used to blowing other players off the court that he never really had to develop that. And on occasions when Djokovic and Nadal could meet his level and give him a good fight, he sometimes wilted. I still think he was the most talented of the big 3. If they all brought their A game, in their prime form, I would give federer the edge on faster surfaces, Djokovic on slower hard courts, and of course Nadal on clay.

Does someone know what the song playing in the background is at 5:00.

I always felt the top three players game has not changed much ,but when it's comes to mental game ,both rafa and roger suffered bcos its all about the mental strength that showed by Novak prevailed him from winning so many GS ! Even when RF was on Match point three times 2010 US semis 2011 Us semis 2019 Wimbledon championships point ,he lost all bcos novak got better of him by his grit mental strength ! So also with Rafa ,but Rafa overcame by beating Nole consistently from 2k17 ! After moya took over !

@marekwichniarek268

2 жыл бұрын

You mean 2019AO and 2021RG?

@VijayRamkrishna

2 жыл бұрын

@@marekwichniarek268 its not Sunday everyday !

@ashleythomas4112

2 жыл бұрын

@@marekwichniarek268 No, he means since 2017 where Rafa leads Novak 5-4 in matches since then. In 2015 and 2016 it was 7-0 for Novak, Rafa leading in meetings since 2017 is a pretty big turn around from that.

What a good player if he keeps this up he’ll be number 1 someday

Man he's putting on a complete clinic in schooling that man

Miss Roger's Nike days

2:11 predicted the future? O_o

Federer has amazing hand/eye coordination.

Just think, after this match it would be 6 months before Djokovic lost another, and nine months before he lost another to someone other than Federer!

When was this?

RF was the Mozart of the Tennis Court, such a peerless maestro !

If Federer plays his best tennis, Djokovic is only picking up tennisballs.

@normanosborn4372

Жыл бұрын

Yeah like in Australian Open semi final 2008, 2011, 2016, 2020 or like in Wimbledon final 2014, 2015, 2019. Or like in US open Final 2015, or US open semi finals 2010,2011 or Roland Garos 2012. Djokovic owned Federer at Slams.

@fransiscoscaramanga674

Жыл бұрын

@@normanosborn4372 Exactly, fedals will never acknowledge how great Djokovic is........

@ChristiaanRoest79

Жыл бұрын

​​@@normanosborn4372 thats not what i meant. Federer wasnt playing his best tennis during these slam matches. I have seen Federer playing his best against Djokovic and during these matches Djokovic had zero chance.

@ChristiaanRoest79

Жыл бұрын

​@@fransiscoscaramanga674 Djokovic is great but Federer during his best matches crushes Djokovic.

@fransiscoscaramanga674

Жыл бұрын

😆😅🤣😂😂🤣you should try stand up comedy......maybe try hosting that show night at the improv.........

Wow. Just stunning tennis

And this is AFTER the courts have slowed down and he was beyond his peak but only had glimpses of his former self. Peak Fed on fast courts was in a league of his own.

Federer is the goat ... no doubt. They would be same age... djokovic would have no chance

@meshalsinnen5917

3 жыл бұрын

Nice try. Djokovic here isn't half the player he would become. I'd say it would have been quite even.

@meshalsinnen5917

3 жыл бұрын

@Aston Martin I'd say it's pretty close although if you put a gun to my head and asked me to pick the winner, I'd go with Djokovic.

@AgastyaBajaj

3 жыл бұрын

@@meshalsinnen5917 On grass Roger is destroying Novak. Clay it’s a 50/50 and Novak is obviously superior to Roger on hard but I feel like Prime Federer would outsmart his mental issues and easily beat Djokovic. This was close to Djokovic’s prime aswell.

@meshalsinnen5917

3 жыл бұрын

@@AgastyaBajaj on grass, Roger is destroying Novak. Yes yes - he's done that three times I hear.

@AgastyaBajaj

3 жыл бұрын

@@meshalsinnen5917 There’s a 7 year gap between them. Roger also didn’t have a mental issue against Djokovic in his prime. He should’ve won last year if it wasn’t for his age and mentality. His technical ability on grass is superior to Novak so he would’ve won for sure.