The teacher's accent is so soothing and accurate , the confidence and clarity in his voice are the best things to listen to,my respect for you mister .

I can't express my appreciation to you, Mr. Ashworth, in words alone. You literally saved me many times, and you had me become obsessed with Linguistics in general, and Pragmatics in particular.

@user-vw9sl5oo9n

10 ай бұрын

Hi you ...where you from ...I am Ola From Yemen.

@Doua22299

9 ай бұрын

hey, it's Doua from Algeria @@user-vw9sl5oo9n

Youre the goat man. This is just what I needed after feeling down but still having to study.

Another great video by one of my fav linguistics channels! Please make more videos. Your videos really help me to keep my knowledge fresh! :)

This channel has been so helpful to me this semester. I wish I had discovered you earlier. You make this content so easy to consume. Sitting my last last paper in Semantics and Pragmatics tomorrow. This just helped me answer a question on invoking implicatures and implicature utilization in maxim clash. Thank you Mr.Ashworth❤

Hi Mr. Ashworth. I just want to say thank you so much because your videos literally SAVED my life! I love to watch your videos especially during my examination week ( actually my exam is tomorrow😂) , because it's so soothing and easy to understand. I really hope that you will keep posting more videos and discuss about more topics in the future! Once again, thanks Mr. Ashworth and have great day. Greetings from Malaysia 💕 !

That kiss at the end😄

Welcome back 😊 I am M A student in linguistics, and you are the best thank you so much 🙏🏻

It's sad there's no new videos on the channel, but thank you for what you were (or still are) doing

@evanashworth490

10 ай бұрын

I hope to be back within the next few weeks 🙂

Thank you! This was a perfect summary, just what I needed to judge whether I should pursue this idea further for my research.

These videos are amazing for a linguistics student. I hope you begin to make videos again. Thank you very much, sir.

Loved this. Excellent and funny way to understand the cooperative principle.

Thank you so much, Mr. Evan. Greeting from Indonesia 👋

Your examples were life saving .. thank u

I just like how you explaine all this stuff.🎉🎉🎉thanks

The last violation took me in the heart. :D

Thank you! I study linguistics and i hope I’ll be a linguist in the future even though my country doesn’t support this science until now.

@Doua22299

Жыл бұрын

same here

Hey your backkk😍😍😍 great videos ❤👍

Thank you very much, I really like Your way of explaining, and I approve of your videos When I study for my exams.

Thank you for helping us,,i have a final exam tomorrow about cooperative Principle and this video helpd me a lot. Thank you sir

Thanks!! I got a lot from this video :)

Sir, your way of explaining is beautiful and your videos are very useful. I hope you come back soon to make new videos and continue your good job ،Thank you for your efforts.

It is very helpful 😊. Thank you so much.

thanks alot for these videos

Thank you so much for this video!!!!

A life saver💕

Great video 👍🏾

this is really helpful sir,

EXCELLENT TEACHER, SUBSCRIBED

Thank you sir for this, came at the right time 🙏🏽

great video, thanks !!!!!!!

loled at the end... man you're goat

Hi! We are looking forward to the upcoming videos as two linguistics students eager to learn. Pleaseee come back sir! 🥰

thank you so much for helping us🤩

Hello Man, Thanks for sharing this! By the way, which one of the followings is correct 1. Write the note neatly 2. write the note neat in the first example "neatly" is working as an adverb that how the note should be written. But I was wondering in the second example the adjective "neat" is used as an object complement that to state what the object "the note" has to become. but on the other hand, The second example sounds strange. Please help me with this that will make me so grateful to you.

@evanashworth490

Жыл бұрын

Hello! Prescriptively, the first example is "correct", but for linguists, the second example is just fine, as both examples mean the same thing. I hope that helps!

The best ❤️

Surely you would be a better professor than that I have right now!! The current is an asshole... greatings bro :D

Hi Evan, I love your videos! Do you have any textbook recommendation on English grammar/linguistics 101 for learners who do not major in English? Thanks in advance! I hope u have a nice day

@evanashworth490

Жыл бұрын

Hi Soraya! The introductory linguistics textbooks I might recommend would be The Study of Language by George Yule and Language Files (published by Ohio State University). I hope that helps!

Thank you Sir... I would like to hear about Neuro-Linguistics from you. 🙏

@evanashworth490

Жыл бұрын

I do have a couple neurolinguistics-related videos: "Psycholinguistics: Language and the Brain" and "Slips of the Tongue and Slips of the Ear", but I may try to create a dedicated video to neurolinguistics in the future. Thanks for watching!

Nice 👌 thanks 😊 What about figures of speech, other than sarcasm, do they flout the maxims? Hyperbole, metaphor, personification...

@evanashworth490

Жыл бұрын

This is a great question, and my feeling is that other figures of speech can but don't always flout a maxim. However, for example, if the speaker piles on too many metaphors, the meaning could be easily lost on the addressee, so that might constitute a flouting (or probably a violation) of the maxim of manner (namely, the speaker is not "clear"). I hope that helps!

veery useful thanks

I like the way you lecture

Thanks a lot!

Thank you so much for the information 🤧

Where are you new videos dear Evan? Is everything alright? Just a curious fan who wants to see more videos of you! Salute to the lecturer! :)

@evanashworth490

10 ай бұрын

Thanks--the beginning of the semester here is hectic, but I hope to upload another video within a month. Thank you for being a subscriber!

Thanks bro

Hello, Professor Evan, Let me first say that your way of delivering the information is unique and informative. I have a humble request, I am doing a master in English linguistics, so could you be my supervisor?

@evanashworth490

Жыл бұрын

Hi Muhammad. I am honored by your request, but, unfortunately, I am not accepting new advisees at this time. Sorry about that!

@muhammadAliAhmad.

Жыл бұрын

@Evan Ashworth Multiple thanks, professor. I do understand that you might be a lot busy, and I realise that I am not lucky enough to have you as my advisor. Thank you again.

Gracias! Mejor explicado que un año de clases con mi profesora de oral 4,😅

Excellent

Thank you... Teacher Evan I would like to know... the types of Semantics?!?

@evanashworth490

Жыл бұрын

Hi, Mohammed! I'm not sure if it will help, but I have a video on several topics in semantics called "lexical semantics"

thank you

Thanksa lot Mr. Evan for your effort. Actually I have a question concerning phonology and pragmatics,and I'm all hope that you will help me🙏

@evanashworth490

Жыл бұрын

Hi Khulood. I will try to help!

@khuloodahmed2437

Жыл бұрын

@@evanashworth490 What is the best model to follow in order to analyse intonation in terms of phono-pragmatic analysis. Furthermore, how can I design eclectic model concerning these two fields?

@evanashworth490

Жыл бұрын

@@khuloodahmed2437 Whoa--sorry, that question is a bit outside my area of expertise, but I think you could use the transcription system devised by Jefferson and Schegloff which is used for conversation analysis. I'm not sure about your second question though, sorry.

Thanks a lot, sir. Please keep sharing more, they help a lot! A:What do you think of Evan Ashworth's videos on KZread? B: Those videos are the shit, you gotta check them out ASAP. Without violating or flouting any of the maxims, right? :)

This absolutely saved me! Thanks to you, Mr. Ashworth.

Hey, Can you please do a video on approaches to Language analysis. Traditional grammar, structural grammar etc

@evanashworth490

8 ай бұрын

Hello! I may make a video on this topic in the future.

Zaddy 🤩 (Was this a violation of the Maxim of Relation?)

@evanashworth490

Жыл бұрын

This is actually a complicated question to answer. I had to look up what "zaddy" means, but if you mean to call me an attractive, older man (thanks!), then, I guess it's not entirely irrelevant because I just take it as a general compliment about the video. However, if you mean something else by "zaddy" (e.g., the sound a Cadillac makes when idling too low), then, yes, it would be a violation of the maxim of relation.

What’s the difference between relation and manner

@kenza.teaches

Жыл бұрын

Relation: stick to the point (don't talk about something i don't ask you about ) Manner : be clear ( not ambiguous )

You’ve not made any video on applied linguistics, Generative phonology, Cognitive linguistics 💔😥.

@evanashworth490

Жыл бұрын

I have no plans to make a video on generative phonology, but I plan to make one on applied linguistics and, perhaps later on, one on cognitive linguistics.

I liked a LOT those long vídeos…

@evanashworth490

Жыл бұрын

Thanks! I've just moved toward shorter videos because we humans tend to have short attention spans.

The last one 😂

Please, could you explain how to get fuzzy expression from the text?

@evanashworth490

Жыл бұрын

Hi! I'm not sure what you mean by "fuzzy expression"

La intencionalidad es definida en la tradición psicologista como una propiedad de la mente (o conciencia) que consiste en que sus estados (los estados de conciencia o mentales) están dirigidos hacia algo, se relacionen o traten acerca de algo, que es su contenido u objeto intencional. Pero este objeto intencional es algo exclusivamente mental, retengamos esto. El lenguaje se encarga de expresar solo ese contenido mental y no una realidad del mundo externa a la mente, con su valor de verdad o falsedad. Siempre que pienso, pienso algo. No es posible pensamiento sin contenido. Pero ¿cómo se relaciona este psicologismo con la filosofía del lenguaje de Grice? ¿Cómo se establece la relación significado-mente? Pues bien, de modo tradicional, el estudio de la mente y de los conceptos o contenidos mentales se ha basado en el estudio de su expresión en el lenguaje, en el análisis de cómo el lenguaje expresa los contenidos mentales: cómo decimos las cosas que pensamos, de qué modo las expresamos. En este sentido, para Grice existen dos elementos del lenguaje que cumplen el rol de ejes referenciales: 1) las oraciones de actitud proposicional y 2) los nombres comunes (o términos generales).

Great

😂😂 love this

Hello there! I know I'm being late, but can someone here explain to me what it means to observe a maxim (and what is the non-observance of a maxim)? I don't understand that and I feel pretty stupid for that =-=

@evanashworth490

9 ай бұрын

Hello. You're certainly not stupid! I describe the difference between violating and flouting a maxim in the video, and generally, non-observance of a maxim is either violating or flouting a maxim.

Can I show this video for my defence exam? Thank you! :)

@evanashworth490

Жыл бұрын

I don't see why not--as long as you are defending, and not me!

Ok sir, since nobody's ready to say it, I'll volunteer. You're hot, professor. Thanks!

Hi, teacher ...please, I am a Collage student and I am seeking for a recommendation which book that u recommend me to study to overcome problems I am facing with discourse analysis, I am lost with this subject . Indeed thank you 4 all❤.

@evanashworth490

9 ай бұрын

Hello! I might suggest looking at Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method (1st edition) by Marianne W Jorgensen and Louise Phillips. I hope that helps!

Quantity and manner looks similar to each other for me. Can you explain the difference with one example, please?

@evanashworth490

Жыл бұрын

Sure! Consider the example below in which speaker A is a teacher and speaker B is a 3rd grader: A: Do you have any questions about multiplication tables? B: Does 8 times 8 = 36? A: I cannot divulge the answer but you should eschew obfuscation by consulting your textbook. In the third line, speaker A isn't necessarily speaking too much (violating maxim of quantity), but they are definitely violating the maxim of manner by using unnecessarily complex language with a child, which creates confusion. I hope that helps!

Best

Hello Sir,I want to read this book name A comprehensive grammar of the English language written by Randolp qurik,but I found it difficult to understand, could you suggest me what are the topics in grammar I need to have better concept to understand this book.❤

@evanashworth490

Жыл бұрын

Hello! Yes, Quirk can be difficult to read, and I think part of this has to do with the way Quirk writes and the time in which he was writing. I found it useful to have a strong grasp on a grammatical terminology (e.g., subordinate clauses, lexical categories).

Binance's CEO discusses future developments in an exclusive interview - don't miss it

You're creative! Why taking so long to make videos for the channel!

@evanashworth490

Жыл бұрын

Thanks! These just take a lot of time to create.

Hi. When a final syllable is cut off , we call is 'apocope,. When the initial syllable is cut ofd, we call it "'syncope' How to call when the middle syllable is cut off?

@evanashworth490

Жыл бұрын

Hello! Syncope can also involve deletion from the middle of a word 🙂

@rappop7977

Жыл бұрын

@@evanashworth490 My bad. I am not sure about the cutting off initial syllable. How do we call when the initial syllable is cut off?

we contract is not as "isn't" and are not as "aren't". How do we contract am not is formal situation?

@evanashworth490

Жыл бұрын

I suppose I would say, "I'm not..."

I’m here from OAU dem wan kill me for this school 😫

A) we'll all miss john and mary,won't we? B)well,we all miss john Which maxim is violated at this example ?

@evanashworth490

Жыл бұрын

That looks like the maxim of manner is being flouted (not a serious violation to me) because the listener must use inference to determine that the speaker doesn't miss Mary.

I cannot make difference between flouting and violating maxims for All maxiems I have exams 😐can you explain it please

@evanashworth490

3 ай бұрын

Briefly, "violating" a maxim means breaking the rule of the maxim, but "flouting" only appears to break the rule of the maxim (by creating an implication that the listener/reader must figure out).

ADHD, aka we always flout the maxim of quantity.

Whatever. Excel·lent.

This dude is reading excerpts from George Yule's book "The study of language" 😆

@evanashworth490

Жыл бұрын

Sure am! Also, from Language Files and A Concise Introduction to Linguistics. Covering content from introductory linguistics texts is one of the main purposes of this channel. Thanks for watching!

The best ❤️