The Conversion of T.S. Eliot - Lord Harries of Pentregarth

T. S. Eliot's The Wasteland was the voice of a disillusioned generation and reflected a world in disarray. Then in 1928 Eliot announced to a startled world, and the disapproval of his contemporaries, that his general point of view could be described as classicist in literature, royalist in politics and anglo-catholic in religion. The previous year he had been baptised behind closed doors in Finstock Church, near Oxford.
This lecture will consider that conversion with three interlinked questions in mind: From what was he converted? Why did he convert? What was the immediate effect of that conversion? The recently published 6 volumes of Eliot's letters covering the period help shed light on the answers.
The lecture will also explore how this new direction in his life is reflected in the poems he wrote at the time.
The transcript and downloadable versions of the lecture are available from the Gresham College website: www.gresham.ac.uk/lectures-an...
Gresham College has offered free public lectures for over 400 years, thanks to the generosity of our supporters. There are currently over 2,500 lectures free to access. We believe that everyone should have the opportunity to learn from some of the greatest minds. To support Gresham's mission, please consider making a donation: gresham.ac.uk/support/

Пікірлер: 37

  • @Idmoment
    @Idmoment2 жыл бұрын

    T.S. Eliot…he purified, concentrated, and distilled language giving words the power to live on impacting our souls

  • @ethanrogers4610
    @ethanrogers4610 Жыл бұрын

    T.S. Eliot is one of the greatest poets/writers of all time. I love his poem "Morning at the Window." W.H. Auden is my favorite poet and Auden's poem "Funeral Blues" is my favorite poem. The Waste Land is Eliot's magnum opus. I read it long ago. He died 8 years before I was born but I would have been so honored to have been able to sit down and just talk to Eliot.

  • @JohnBarnwell888
    @JohnBarnwell888 Жыл бұрын

    T. S. Eliot did a radio broadcast on September 26, 1959, for Nordwestdeutscher Rundfunk. Here is the quotation:

 “I think that the present time will spontaneously lead to something like the separation of individual human beings from time’s events. They will stand on their own feet, and from their innermost being they will seek new paths, spiritual paths. It seems to me that Goethe, for example, had a compass of consciousness which far surpassed that of his nineteenth century contemporaries. Rudolf Steiner expressly upheld this, and I do too. In a certain connection, atomic science has a meaning, namely inasmuch as it is in the hands of men who are in no way able to cope with it. It has no importance whatever for the progress of mankind. I 
see the path of progress for modern man in his occupation with his own self, with his inner being, as indicated by Rudolf Steiner.”

  • @jtoneal3344
    @jtoneal33445 жыл бұрын

    This lecture is MIND BLOWING.Wow. I need to listen to this at least 2 or 3 times.

  • @jmichaelortiz
    @jmichaelortiz2 жыл бұрын

    Thank you, Lord Harries, for this. Marvelous.

  • @tamarahorsburgh2144
    @tamarahorsburgh2144 Жыл бұрын

    Absolutely beautiful! And Lord Harris's book Haunted by Christ is fabulous.

  • @sk.armanali85
    @sk.armanali852 жыл бұрын

    Thanks a lot for this mind blowing lecture

  • @steveculbert4039
    @steveculbert4039 Жыл бұрын

    Herbert Read was a wonderful critic and scholar. The best way to study Eliot's thought and life is to read his poems and essays first to last.

  • @anselman3156
    @anselman31565 жыл бұрын

    Very interesting and enjoyable reflections on the great man. A little mistake at 1.42 - his second wife was Valerie Fletcher. Vivienne was the name of his first wife.

  • @gabrielbtongs6787

    @gabrielbtongs6787

    4 жыл бұрын

    I rarely make comments on YT, but I appreciate the humility and tact with which you made that correction. Both are in short supply online.

  • @honeychurchgipsy6

    @honeychurchgipsy6

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@gabrielbtongs6787 - well put - I agree - we need to accept that people make mistakes when speaking. Here it is clear that the speaker knows who Eliot's second wife was because he gets the second name correct - he simply muddles two very similar first names.

  • @thomasboyd8393
    @thomasboyd83936 жыл бұрын

    Thank you.

  • @dark_red_blood
    @dark_red_blood Жыл бұрын

    Thank you

  • @tagetallqvist1296
    @tagetallqvist12962 жыл бұрын

    Very Interesting

  • @Dyslexic-Artist-Theory-on-Time
    @Dyslexic-Artist-Theory-on-Time6 жыл бұрын

    Thanks for sharing!!!

  • @rsclasses5237
    @rsclasses52373 жыл бұрын

    Thanks a lot

  • @RwakaendanaMambo
    @RwakaendanaMambo5 жыл бұрын

    At the bottom of every man's there is a beast. Therefore, they require;Strict Spiritual Self-discipline.

  • @sandiarnp

    @sandiarnp

    4 жыл бұрын

    Thank you, I was very curious what led to Eliot’s return to the Christian faith. I know he suffered terribly in his marriage. I also wonder how much Bertrand Russel impacted his conversion- perhaps in seeing the hypocrisy and shallowness of Russell’s atheist philosophy (as I wrote this, you mention it). I wonder if it is Russel he runs into in the section of Little Gidding where he tells this person...” of the things done to others harm which you took for exercise of virtue ...” such an incredible mind was TS Eliot .

  • @sandiarnp

    @sandiarnp

    4 жыл бұрын

    Wrote the journey of the magi with the help of half a bottle of gin....how I love this man. And how very British of him.

  • @honeychurchgipsy6

    @honeychurchgipsy6

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@sandiarnp - you make a lot of judgements based upon your assumption that an atheist MUST be a bad person. Please explain how there is any such thing as an atheist philosophy (don't bother because there isn't one: atheism is simply the rejection of the idea that gods exist), oh, and what harm did Russell do to others (this is what you are implying isn't it?)

  • @robertelson4473
    @robertelson44732 жыл бұрын

    When he refers to "W. T. Stead"(e.g. 12.00), I think he means William Force Stead, thus W.F. Stead.

  • @steveculbert4039
    @steveculbert4039 Жыл бұрын

    This lecture could have been powerfully made had the man used a blackboard with an outline sketched on it. Then, he would have been free to look at people rather than stumble through reading.

  • @SJ-oi7tk
    @SJ-oi7tk3 ай бұрын

    5 ads in 9 minutes, classy

  • @robertelson4473
    @robertelson44732 жыл бұрын

    W.T. Stead died in 1912.

  • @sgsmozart
    @sgsmozart2 жыл бұрын

    He was born in Saint Louis( Lewis)..NOT Saint Looee !

  • @2msvalkyrie529
    @2msvalkyrie5298 ай бұрын

    Is it still compulsory to be LGBT +in order to become an Anglian ? Just checking ...

  • @georgekirazian5591
    @georgekirazian55913 жыл бұрын

    Splendid commentary, a rather poor reading....

  • @lesleypatriciajordison4890
    @lesleypatriciajordison4890Ай бұрын

    Educated southern people should really learn to be wary of the phrase "of all places" - it rarely reflects well on them!

  • @vanitayogeshwar5698
    @vanitayogeshwar56984 ай бұрын

    I always laugh when I hear Sanskrit pronounced as Sanscript. It is pronounced as “Sunskrit”. JIC you’re interested. 😊

  • @martinhanley9524
    @martinhanley9524 Жыл бұрын

    Unitarian church today is woke today

  • @jeromesullivan4015
    @jeromesullivan4015 Жыл бұрын

    Well, my Boston family has more accurate stories

  • @johnmahoney3566
    @johnmahoney35662 жыл бұрын

    A real Lord Haw Haw here babbling on.

  • @bdff4007

    @bdff4007

    Жыл бұрын

    A few lines from Eliot's book of Practical Cats and his correspondence with Groucho Marx might have dispersed the yellow fog. Now abide these three: gloom, doom, despair?

  • @johntobey1558
    @johntobey1558 Жыл бұрын

    Unitarianism is NOT Christianity.

  • @robkidd5214
    @robkidd5214 Жыл бұрын

    Part sod part genius part hypocrite. Rough life....