asking for immunity ... while claiming to be innocent ?

@donaldspaulding6973

29 күн бұрын

Common sense which many (some on SCOTUS) lack.

@swimminginthoughts

29 күн бұрын

Not quite, but keep saying this because it's cute!

@DavidStrchld

29 күн бұрын

And also claiming that the current president who trump claims is crooked, would get off scott free.

@markkozlowski3674

29 күн бұрын

There is no inconsistency in that. Immunity is a defense to prosecution. It is in no way an admission of guilt.

@DebORahDramatica

29 күн бұрын

​@@swimminginthoughtsMY GIRLFRIEND SYBIL HAS A CUTE TRILL WHEN SHE SINGS!🤬

Thank you Justice Jackson , for stating things in a reality based way.

@Swansong-recorders

29 күн бұрын

Agreed she is staying the straight up obviousness of how stupid their argument is

@mvp1116

29 күн бұрын

But she doesn't call her colleagues out on their BS. She is just as bad..

@marshcreek4355

29 күн бұрын

@@mvp1116 Unfortunately, she can't be at war with her peers whom she may have to work with for 20+ years barring the unforeseen. There is a way to engage in intellectual warfare with calling people out directly. She did that.

@afry6400

29 күн бұрын

@@mvp1116 You really don't think that her questions qualify as calling them out by pointing out the obvious that they all should already have in mind?? Interesting... I thought she did exactly that without being blunt about it.

So absurd that the court would even consider this.

@jamesdouthat3999

29 күн бұрын

why

Thank you, Judge Luttig, a pity you aren’t a member of the Supreme Court.

@nonya.bizness

29 күн бұрын

he's the og of anti-abortion judges.

@balrog322

29 күн бұрын

@@nonya.bizness All I can say to that is nobody’s perfect. I would feel better all the same if his assessment of Trump’s claim was the Court’s final decision in this case.

@normthompson923

29 күн бұрын

If enough vote blue he may be put in after next election.Three dem. judges need to be installed so that scotus works again.Or two and impeach Thomas.

@sheilaboston7051

29 күн бұрын

@@normthompson923 He's 70 years old now - any new appointments need to be much younger, or the SC could end up with another Republican stooge.

@kybed

27 күн бұрын

listen also to george conway's take, he has somewhat a different take.. after listening to the hearing i understand now why there is a need for this.. 3 equal branches of government.. i realized the scotus is actually following due process..

A Supreme Court enabling an Insurrectionist should be removed immediately per the 14th Amendment, then referred to the DOJ for charges! Period!

@JoeJoe-di4oj

29 күн бұрын

The United States government has turned MAGA we are doomed 😮

@12magus

29 күн бұрын

Their positions are theirs only for good behavior. Read Article III.

@paramaniacwolverine843

29 күн бұрын

please indicate where he was charged for 'insurrection' and proven guilty? I've seen more damage at a frat party. Speaking of which, what's going on at the universities at the moment? Building walls and such. Interesting times!

@bobheck8326

28 күн бұрын

@@paramaniacwolverine843 YOU'RE OBVIOUSLY A LIAR.

@cassandra9699

28 күн бұрын

It's all a part of the slow motion coup. All of that from 2020 is still underway.

Only the Guilty and Criminals need or want absolute immunity.

@jameswheeler349

29 күн бұрын

Well that is obvious to anyone with a brain

@mrmark8603

29 күн бұрын

@@jameswheeler349 That discounts 70 million MAGATS!

@jamesdouthat3999

29 күн бұрын

wrong

@robsemail

29 күн бұрын

@@jamesdouthat3999 no, actually it’s absolutely correct. Sorry.

@mrmark8603

29 күн бұрын

@@jamesdouthat3999 I'm sure you hear that a lot.

Only a criminal would want “absolute immunity”.

@richardwilliams4954

29 күн бұрын

Fool

@ziziroberts8041

29 күн бұрын

And why Putin and Xi and Kim have their food tested.

@Spinner28

29 күн бұрын

Stop being so hateful and judgmental- Don't throw stones you may hit your cousin

@seanmccartney5177

29 күн бұрын

Or plead dementia

Absolute immunity? Nope. But absolute INSANITY? Yes.

I still can’t believe this went to the Supreme

The real question is why does it matter if they were Official or Private acts! If you break the law, you break the law!! The rest of us don't get to hide behind our jobs?

@shaystern2453

29 күн бұрын

but trump wants to

@barrylenihan8032

29 күн бұрын

President Truman didn't shirk from his responsibility as President. He had a motto on his desk that said 'the buck stops here'.

@ariaflame-au

29 күн бұрын

Unless you are a cop

@ericvanjames8395

29 күн бұрын

Excellent point!

@geekchameleon

29 күн бұрын

"The law" as you refer to it, is created by Congress, which means that under this theory, they could revoke every single authority and duty of the President regardless of what the Constitution says. The next time the president and Congress are controlled by the same party, at the end of his term, the next president can be castrated and made to serve solely at the discretion of the party in control of Congress. You _really_ want to be careful what you wish for. Since Biden has ordered those who exercise his authority to ignore and wilfully violate the law, and dismantled the tools that proved successful at enforcing the law, there is a whole lot of room to prosecute him for his absolute disregard for enforcing immigration laws among others. You can not simultaneously argue that Mayorkas is just following orders, so shouldn't face any penalties _and_ that the man who gave those orders can't be, either. You can not simultaneously argue that Trump has no immunity, but Biden does. You have no right to complain if the principles you try to put in place for your enemy are used against your ally. If the government is weaponized against Trump, it will most assuredly be weaponized against "your guy" in the not too distant future. The Democrats in congress have pulled the "nuclear option" and had it used against them the next term enough times to prove that once you pull a weapon, the same becomes available to your opponent.

jUDGE lUTTIG, IS A TRUE PATRIOT, MAY GOD BLESS HIM.

@runoz2839

29 күн бұрын

FRFR 🙌 Just a Great Human Being, *PERIODT*

@bj6515

29 күн бұрын

For F#*ks sake don't use tRumps Bible.

@godlygirls62

29 күн бұрын

Don't forget to give Justice Brown her props. Yo girl ripped this theory of complete immunity to shreds.

@ray-sharp8563

28 күн бұрын

He’s also, like Bob Woodward, very much chicken of Trump

@runoz2839

28 күн бұрын

@@ray-sharp8563 @ least he's *NOT* sitting on *VITAL INFO* the public *NEEDS/NEEDED @ THAT TIME* just to sale books 🤦🙄🤨

If Presidents or ex-Presidents have absolute immunity , then why was Nixon pardoned by President G. Ford ? 🤔🤔🤔🤔

@davidhamm5626

29 күн бұрын

Something to think about....

@balrog322

29 күн бұрын

Quid pro quo, imo. Ford was a reliable GOP hack throughout his career. But your point is well taken. Sans pardon, Nixon was certain to be prosecuted.

@eatmorenachos

29 күн бұрын

The same reason Nixon accepted that pardon (which is an admission of guilt). Nixon KNEW he'd be charged AND convicted.

@jancosmits98

29 күн бұрын

@@eatmorenachos which according to Trump's legal team isn't possible , coz Nixon also wasn't impeached .

@marlarochelle7405

29 күн бұрын

Great question

I feel so helpless when the Supreme Court won’t protect us citizens from their own government! 😢

@kenc7120

29 күн бұрын

Your tears are hiarious 🤣

@eliassalcedo5229

29 күн бұрын

They have owners.

@sayhisnamewhickerfjb

29 күн бұрын

"Elections have consequences" Barack Obama 2009

@swimminginthoughts

29 күн бұрын

​@@kenc7120I think they're delicious.

@sayhisnamewhickerfjb

29 күн бұрын

Thank you to Ruth Buzzy Ginsberg

We are asking this corrupt supreme court to rule on this issue???? F~!

@Nothingbutlovehere369

29 күн бұрын

We didn’t ask. They took it up. After the 3rd Circuit decision. Which is solid. Shame shame shame on this Court!

@willemvandeursen3105

29 күн бұрын

@Avalon, O, yes. And the SC judges will personally carry Trump into the White House, and make sure that the freezers are crammed with the most unhealthy food. As per Emperor's decree.

@runoz2839

29 күн бұрын

yep 🙄🤦

@eclipsehorse8693

29 күн бұрын

@@Nothingbutlovehere369 and now it's likely to go back to the lower court for clarification. This is liek bringing your mother a dead bird and she has no idea what it is, so she tells you to go show your grade school teacher in the morning- maybe she knows. Ridiculous!

@TomSpeaks-vw1zp

29 күн бұрын

@@eclipsehorse8693 But it may be that the lower courts in this case have more sense. In these days of uncertainty who knows? To those of us claiming common sense, this case should have never been heard . Have a great day.

No one is above the law

Article 2 says the President “shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed”, in other words: any UNlawful act would fall outside the bounds of the Office and therefore CANNOT be an OFFICIAL act - i.e., an act falling within the scope and responsibilities of the Office.

@stoopidpursun8140

29 күн бұрын

Assassinating a US citizen is an unlawful act. But Obama did exactly that using a drone strike. When will he be prosecuted?

@heemlo649

29 күн бұрын

I guess police officers are committing the crime of kidnapping when arresting someone.

@jackrice2770

29 күн бұрын

Oh, you're using logic and textual meaning! That's not how this court works.

@e-spy

29 күн бұрын

You are right. The insanity of this argument is glaring at us.

@t.tenney3470

29 күн бұрын

We get the "special" Court.

If SCOTUS grants Presidential immunity, then I think I'll run for President and if I win I'll just deposit $1 trillion from the Treasury into my account and then resign.😂

@kenc7120

29 күн бұрын

You wouldn’t win. Don’t quit your burger flipping job.

@swimminginthoughts

29 күн бұрын

The problem with this is that you're going by the media's propaganda version of what immunity means in this case, not what is actually going on.

@KristalovesTrump

29 күн бұрын

Yeah but here's the thing, you've never won a thing in your life. We see you

@tlee4218

29 күн бұрын

Imagine he is making a joke point. It is a good one. Point is this is all BS. There is no immunity.

@DisaffectedLiberal

29 күн бұрын

@@tlee4218 If there isn't, then dont be angry when pretty much all living former presidents are jailed.

Thank you Judge Luttig for your wise and measured words.

Anyone with small children knows that whining about imaginary cheating, is the last resort of the sore loser. - Senator Elisabeth Warren

There is no absolute immunity, and in this case, definitely not!

@jamesdouthat3999

29 күн бұрын

isnt asking for it

Why did't they ask if the potus could just get rid of the supreme court ? Or were they afraid to ask that?

@warrenspeaks

29 күн бұрын

Outstanding comment.

@juliewarner1804

29 күн бұрын

Except for Justice Jackson

@jackrice2770

29 күн бұрын

In effect the Court's "conservatives" (they're actually right-wing radicals) are saying the POTUS can just ignore the courts.

@fumrious

29 күн бұрын

Yup, if he is re-elected by some dark miracle then SCOTUS will be the first to go.

@Padq

29 күн бұрын

Good point. If SC gives Trump immunity, Biden should replace the entire Supreme Court

Such a sad & pathetic time in our country

Judge Ludig would make a good Supreme Court justice.

@nonya.bizness

29 күн бұрын

he's the og anti-abortion judge.

@jimreily7538

25 күн бұрын

Can't be worse than the Trump appointees

@nonya.bizness

25 күн бұрын

@@jimreily7538 we deserve scotus justices that are excellent, not people that are least worse.

Doesn't even matter what the Constitution Says with This supreme. court.

@thjbird

29 күн бұрын

They are there to protect Republicans from the constitution

@howardcohen6817

29 күн бұрын

Real "originalists" want to write the constitution as if it never existed (hypothetically speaking, that is).

I believe it was Alito who said “I want Abstract! I don’t want the facts!” Are you kidding me??? 😮

If the SC gives Trump immunity, it’s all over.

@al-bot1094

29 күн бұрын

If they give Trump immunity, they give Biden immunity. They can wait until after the election, but Trump can't win.

@HendrixFreakazoid

29 күн бұрын

Well Donald Trump or Damian Thorn whichever you prefer to call him it's not a coincidence same initials and number of letters because they are one and the same so yeah it's over

@Lana-oe3qy

29 күн бұрын

No, we can elect a congress that will impeach each of the Supreme Court justices that vote that Trump has immunity.

@turdferguson3475

29 күн бұрын

Drama queen much?

@theoccidilian4896

29 күн бұрын

Right. Maybe 2 years, maybe 20, but it’d be over. Other countries would lose faith, our stabilising force would evaporate, we’d lose the confidence of our allies, and sorry kids, history repeats on a grander scale. End of the world as we know it (and I don’t feel fine).

I feel sorry for Judge Luttig. Like us he must be dismayed this is even a thing. More so, given his conservative credentials, his deep knowledge of the law, and his obvious love for the Constitution. Like another comment has pointed you, if SCOTUS grants immunity, then it's over for this country.

@mikjb

29 күн бұрын

Yes but like so many his faith in the system has kept him and many others from seeing what was happening not just in the dark but in broad daylight for decades. Finally I saw something about trying to impeach 1 of the justices. Talk about a group of people who have been treated like they are above the law. There were red flags on many of the justices that got appointed. If we loose our democracy it has been a group effort. And one of the key reasons is GOP appointed judges

@maryprater7693

26 күн бұрын

It is over! This court is corrupt. Most appointed by McConnell who as the senate leader also refused to impeach Trump twice!!

We did put a criminal in the oval office in 2016.

@mrmark8603

29 күн бұрын

The "poorly educated" did.

@marshacrishon1548

29 күн бұрын

I didn't the people he con did the poorly uneducated and they are so stuck on stupid that they can't see that they are being used

@marshacrishon1548

29 күн бұрын

And the poorly educated did to they are stuck on stupid to

@eclipsehorse8693

29 күн бұрын

@@mrmark8603 "well sheee-it we thought we wuz doin good- he told us he's gunna git ridda tyhe mess-icans and build the wawl, and git tuff on chai-na...we though he wuz onna us! He told us stuff we wunted at heer, and he riled us up and made us feel gud about ah-mer-ika...'

@charlottesmom

29 күн бұрын

I sure as 💩didn’t!! My republican mother in law and husband both voted for Hillary so they didn’t….

SCOTUS, tame this man or he will DEVOUR you!

@willemvandeursen3105

29 күн бұрын

@alandonly, "SCOTUS, tame this man or he will DEVOUR you!" Jabba the Orange Hut already did.

@alinuernberg8399

29 күн бұрын

SCOTUS tames this man? How would that be possible? 6 of them are puppets and he's their puppeteer!

@charlottesmom

29 күн бұрын

Yup, a dictator has zero use for a Supreme Court.

@alandonly

29 күн бұрын

@@alinuernberg8399 Correct. Unless they're shrewd and power-hungry enough to know he'll target them soon enough.

@donnathomas9111

28 күн бұрын

He will devour the USA

The Supreme Court need to be overhauled

@maryprater7693

26 күн бұрын

When will the senate act?

It already was the seat of criminality with Trump in it. That is why we are here.

@tulipp1687

29 күн бұрын

TOTALLY ABSOLUTELY.. LOVE YOUR COMMENT ❤

@brentbarnhart5827

29 күн бұрын

FANTASTIC, and TRUE comment. EXACTLY

@Redsiix

29 күн бұрын

waiting for the cultist to jump on this and talk about how bad JB is running everything. If you don't want trump remember how to vote, because he will get all his cultist to vote for him.

@JP-qi2tc

29 күн бұрын

You Nailed it!!! Too!!!

@frankmalinaro9700

29 күн бұрын

Really , they need to keep up ! Thanks .

No one is above the law..

Is Supreme Court going to save democracy or corruption.??

@eliassalcedo5229

29 күн бұрын

Depends on the vacation packages, they got.

@montetanktankkiller700

29 күн бұрын

This question is a rhetoric oxymoron.

@jdm1657

29 күн бұрын

God help us if democracy doesn't prevail

@sharonwashington9315

29 күн бұрын

they better or they should be charged with failing to do their job because of their biased actions because trump chose them to be on the bench for his benefit, which trump even said is why he put them there, they owe him BS

@janicepalesch9221

29 күн бұрын

A few on the S. Ct. are corruption themselves. Corruption always protects corruption.

"The Constitution doesn't say who determines if someone committed insurrection so we can't do anything" "The Constitution doesn't say anything about presidential immunity so we're going to make up our own law" Funny how easily they can go either way depending soley on how it can help Trump.

@donaldspaulding6973

29 күн бұрын

That and corruption seem to be the goals of SCOTUS.

@KristalovesTrump

29 күн бұрын

Insurrections are armed and very carefully planned. Read instead of watching TV / pedowood movies

@xelamercedes

29 күн бұрын

Maddening but not funny.

@prh129

29 күн бұрын

Good point! It shows what a sham this process is - it's certainly not about the law.

@BoebertsDentist

29 күн бұрын

During Trump's second impeachment, his own impeachment lawyer Bruce Castor argued the DOJ could prosecute Trump after he left office. He has no immunity - and he, his lawyers, and SCOTUS knows it. Innocent people don't claim absolute immunity from prosecution.

I can't believe the Supreme Court agreed to hear this Argument.

@jjteacher7482

29 күн бұрын

They are so full of themselves. They think, not only are they above the law, they ARE the law.

@maryprater7693

26 күн бұрын

This is not a Supreme Court. It is McConnell's court of subordinates.

This shouldn't have to be an issue. NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW!

Im so glad Biden appointed Justice Jackson, she has shown her intellect and righteous disposition places her in upper ranks, among her peers on Supreme Court.

There is NO immunity in the constitution for anyone. If you remove accountability to the people, you guarantee there will be no obligation to the people.

The President on inauguration solemnly swears to faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and to the best of their ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. This solemn oath would be rendered meaningless if the President was granted immunity.

@simonmcelrea7231

27 күн бұрын

Sadly, it was rendered meaningless once Donald Trump was elected to office ... but your point is well made!

Presidential Immunity is a direct equivalent of Fuhrerprinzip.

SCOTUS needs to read (or re read) the Constitution.

@jameswheeler349

29 күн бұрын

They don't care. They are corrupt.

@fredrickmillstead2804

29 күн бұрын

@@jameswheeler349 I believe you are correct sir.

@mikjb

29 күн бұрын

I think America does. We celebrate the 4 of july every year why doesn't that include a little civics like reading the declaration and the constitution. Our nation's documents are not that long.

I'm absolutely terrified about the possibility of a bloodbath if he is not convicted. The only way out of this is to vote blue no matter who. 💙💙

@edpeterson2293

29 күн бұрын

❤️TRUMP 2024❤️

@d.scottgalloway515

29 күн бұрын

@@edpeterson2293BIDEN 2024

@CraftyGrandmaDem

29 күн бұрын

This time around the FBI, DOJ and law enforcement all over will be keeping an eye out for violent chatter on-line. They'll know to take it seriously and be prepared. Last time we were caught off guard because that had never happened in America before. Trump purposefully had only a handful of police around and Jan. 6th. Plus, some of his insurrectionists are still in jail. Maybe new ones won't be so willing to go to jail for him. Vote Biden/blue save our democracy.

@marshacrishon1548

29 күн бұрын

​@@edpeterson2293President Joe Biden for 2024 💙💙💙💙 and stinky DJT for prison 2024 😂😂

@edpeterson2293

29 күн бұрын

@@d.scottgalloway515 enjoy your endless wars.

This was never an issue until this clown came into office, the closest it ever came was with Reagan and the Contra band scandal and even Oliver North knew to take the fall for him SMH

Justice Jackson is the only one with a brain!! ❤

@eclipsehorse8693

29 күн бұрын

of the none, she felt like she was the only one vested in the argument on that day, and the other 8 were gioing thru the motions for appeanace sake. man if I were on that bench, I'd want to know why i was trying to give a preseident immunity for the acts he committed, and want to hear how they pertain to the case. The other 7-8 justices just didn't seem they were all that into hearing about 'little Donny's fight on the playground'

Thank you Judge Luttig. ❤

I wish Judge Luttig was on SCOTUS to keep all those unruly under-educated GOP kids in line.

Why don't we just clear out a seat on the supreme court, for Harlan Crow and Leonard Leo, the Russian plants in our govt..

@antonomaseapophasis5142

29 күн бұрын

I don’t think they are guided by the Russians, but they are useful for the Russians. The Leonard Leo network is more a manifestation of the Billionaire Plutocracy. The Koch, Thiel, Schwab, Musk, Murdoch, Sachs association.

why have a oath of office if you dont have to keep your your oath, simple logic,

Didn't the Washington DC Appellate Court already given her answer with respect to this question? The 57 page document seemed to have been praised by Constitutional experts. Judge Luttig should have been on the Supreme Court.

Judge LUTTIG is a man who stands by America, the constitution and the rule of law

No more Nixon like behavior and no more Rump's psychotic lying!! 😜 😜

“When you are given immunity, that means you probably committed a crime,” Michael Flynn, then an aide on Donald Trump’s presidential campaign, said on Meet the Press in September 2016, the Washington Post reports.

@jimreily7538

25 күн бұрын

I don't know much about this Michael Flynnn except those comments you've just posted, but he sounds he was absolutely right, and surely he's a very sensible and rational man. Distinguished, scholarly and erudite, just the sort of man who'd be a sound and sober Presidential advisor.

Robert’s court is not trust worthy! Shame….

I hope Judge Chutkan will accept the challenge from the lawless justices who vote to remand the immunity question in any form to her. She should issue a swift, unapologetic and forceful opinion that the Constitution does not contemplate, much less require, any immunity for a president, former or current, for any crime. She should refuse to make any determination on any charge regarding the official acts, private acts or the ridiculous "periphery" acts formulation. She should force them to go on record as to whether they are authoritarian, political hacks in robes or actual justices of the Supreme Court.

This man should have been nominated to the Supreme Court. A conservative *with integrity… AND a brain*! I don’t consider myself a conservative, but I demand integrity on SCOTUS.

Donald Trump should be in prison

@PissedOffCanuck

29 күн бұрын

For?

Judge Luttig I love you you’re a man of truth & honor. I hope and pray all of your work is fruitful 🙏💜

I wish he was on High Court!!

Thank you, Judge Ludwig! We need honorable people like you on the Supreme Court.

Dear God, Please help us.

@ariaflame-au

29 күн бұрын

I thought he helped those that helped themselves.

It's only a criminal who knows he is guilty would raise the question of any kind of immunity much less "absolute immunity ".

So sad that the court even took up the case

@philipmullins5185

29 күн бұрын

They took it up because Trump wants delay , delay and more delay because he appears not to be able defend himself against the real evidence against him .

Absolute power can result in absolute corruption.

It would be regrettable for the nation if the Supreme Court Justices were to act inappropriately. The courts should remain impartial and ensure that the laws of the Constitution are upheld. Their primary function is to enforce the law, not to create new laws.

It's absurd that this is the subject of debate. Of COURSE no one should be immune from prosecution...

There is no divine right of immunity for elected presidents.

I wonder how many times since the creation of SC that their integrity has come into question? How do these justices internally justify not adhering to the Constitution? How do we not have anything in place for when the SC blatantly snub their noses at conflict of interest and for padding their incomes with gifts? Also, when the SC does not apply the rule of law as stated in constitution, how is that ok and we just plug along like nothing to see here? It’s confusing and frightening. Do we even need them if they are not doing their job for the American people and judge like it’s the Wild West?

He is entitled to nothing as he is now a regular citizen

The Americans have a choice on who they want in power.

The fact that a man who's a clear and present danger, a traitor, a wannabe dictator is allowed to run for president of the USA is just mind-blowing.

Gotta love Justice Jackson❤❤❤she tells it like it IS‼️

Justice Jackson - the voice of reason.

This kangaroo supreme Court is out of there mind fact!!!

Why has it never been needed or used before ?

Just saying . Any Republican that wishes to remain in politics after the Spcl. Elections of late oughta consider why they are losing .

Basically what honorable Judge Luttig is saying, is that Scotus is so far off track they aren't abiding by the US Constitution. And that if he were the judge receiving this remand, maybe he would just send it back to Scotus saying "there is no immunity in the US Constitution -- go fish."

Black women will save us all from MAGA. Vote blue on the whole ticket.

I like how the judge refers to Trump as " the former President'...Trump must hate that!

The only thing Trump can really claim is Absolute Imbecility.

Funny I’ve never saw abortion in the Constitution either?

@swimminginthoughts

29 күн бұрын

Please do not post facts contrary to the Democrat narrative here. Will you delete this or edit it to call Trump a fascist or something?

@nnanna1439

29 күн бұрын

@@swimminginthoughtsno but Privacy is and a persons body is directly related to their privacy.

@DisaffectedLiberal

29 күн бұрын

@@nnanna1439 Q: Can you voluntarily have any limbs removed by a surgeon without medical necessity?

@BoebertsDentist

29 күн бұрын

Michael, sugarplum, all males should be forced to get vasectomies and not cause unwanted pregnancies to begin with otherwise mind your business.

@nnanna1439

29 күн бұрын

@@DisaffectedLiberal not the same but nice try.

Only guilty people ask for immunity.

Thank you Judge Luttig✨🇺🇸✨💙✨

I truly believe in Karma, and you can bet she's looking right at our Supreme Court justices.

Judge Jackson👏👏👏👏👏

NO IMMUNITY‼ Period!!!!

REAL JUDGE LUTTIG!!!

Simple. The Constitution says that States have full control over the elections in each state. Any contact with any state facility or state representative or election worker of any kind it is illegal, no immunity.

The equal protections provided by the constitution for State and Federal law should nullify immunity, or provide it to everyone.

It's insanity that the supreme court even are arguing the point of absolute immunity for Trum

Thank you Judge Jackson.✨🇺🇸✨💙✨

It doesn’t mention abortion either.

@alij9888

29 күн бұрын

It doesn’t mention cars, computers, or TikTok but here we are.

@mackjrbell7828

29 күн бұрын

It does mention lifetime choices to personal dignity and autonomy central to liberty, which is in the 14th ammendment.

@Simo-nk1oq

29 күн бұрын

@@mackjrbell7828 But not abortion.

@mackjrbell7828

29 күн бұрын

@@Simo-nk1oq You're not clever, let's not split hairs. It doesn't mention cancer neither but a diagnosis and treatment is still no one's business but the patient and doctor's.

@Simo-nk1oq

29 күн бұрын

@@mackjrbell7828 There's a HYOOGE difference between cancer and ending a human life.

THE CONSTITUTION DOESN'T MENTION STORMY DANIELS OR MY GIRLFRIEND SYBIL!🤬

@ariaflame-au

29 күн бұрын

And he wasn’t the president then anyway

Just hearing this case gives it an air of seriousness it actually lacks.

There is no need for any immunity against criminal charges whether for "official acts" or otherwise.

That’s been my point The constitution doesn’t mention immunity The SCOTUS is supposed to interpret laws in comparison to the constitution There is no law giving immunity The SCOTUS has nothing to do with this question

At least we can rely on Judge Thomas to base his judgement on objective analysis and not on unwavering...blind allegiance to the man -child....

@debvoz

29 күн бұрын

in Uncle Thomas's case it isn't loyalty to the man-child it is loyalty to the cash cow

@susanhewitt6359

29 күн бұрын

You're kidding, right? Clarence Thomas has been corrupt his whole tenure on the SC!

If a person is innocent, why would they even need immunity ? What am I missing here ? 😉

Justice Jackson, you are absolutely right on. You realize that no one is above the law. Full stop.

The Supreme Court, delay flavor of the week.

The constitution doesn't mention abortion.

@sayhisnamewhickerfjb

29 күн бұрын

The Constitution doesn't mention badminton either.

@markkozlowski3674

29 күн бұрын

Nor, surprisingly enough, does it mention television, nuclear weapons, electricity, Islam, political parties, women, etc., etc., etc. And yet it has been applied to disputes involving all these things. It's funny that way.

@krimmer66

29 күн бұрын

it doesn't need to be, at the time of the writing it was legal and women had the right and it was well known to be an issue between the woman and her doctor. Regardless, we amend the constitution to meet our times so Dems know what they now have to do when they have the house and senate back.

@pauljasmine353

29 күн бұрын

@markkozlowski3674 For the most part, the Supreme Court has done a pretty good job in interpreting the Constitution.

@markkozlowski3674

29 күн бұрын

@@pauljasmine353 It depends who you ask.