Cholas were staunch 'Lord Shiva' devotees....

@சுரேஸ்தமிழ்

Жыл бұрын

Tamils ​​are not Hindus but Saivas kzread.info/dash/bejne/Ynt_qrKbccuoncY.html The Cholas severely punished those who did not accept Saivism

भगवान शिव और भगवान विष्णु का जिक्र किया गया है लेकिन ये दोनों कहीं पर उपलब्ध नहीं हो सके आज तक , इसका मतलब यह भी है कि ये भी काल्पनिक चरित्र हो होंगे कुछ राजाओं ने खुद को ही विष्णु और शिव कहलाया होगा ,

Like all these controversies… at least my brothers from North will know about the real Tamils History and Heritage and Culture.. the true identity of India starts and ends with Tamil only.. the great Dr Bhimrao Ambedkar mentions in his book ‘the untouchables’ the peoples in the entire region of Indian Subcontinent were Tamils.. Great Video sir..

आज काल मूर्ख लोग ही क्वेश्चन उठाते है चाहे वो नेता जो या कलाकार

PONNIYAN SELVAN - IS ANOTHER NAME OF Chola emperor Rajaraja chola who built the Great Siva temple in Thanjavur called Brihadeeswara temple. Ponni means River Cauvery and Selvan means Son. Mane ki - Kaveri Putra ! King Raja Raja was popularly called Son of holy river Cauvery

@mahakkalpandey3547

Жыл бұрын

Kamal haasan ko suno burbak mat bano chaahe wo shiv puja m apna jeewan khapa diya but wo hindu naho tha..

@patikmahir

Жыл бұрын

@@mahakkalpandey3547 🤣🤣वा बेटा वो कमल हासन तो हिंदू विरोधी है तू भी हिंदू विरोधी है 🤣🤣

@mahakkalpandey3547

Жыл бұрын

@@patikmahir abe lodu main kyu hindu virodhi rahungaa.. Sanatan to is mitti ki pehchaan h.. Wo gaandu bol raha tha.. Wo hi to keh raha hu..

@patikmahir

Жыл бұрын

@@mahakkalpandey3547हां सॉरी भाई पर हमें हिंदू कहना ग़लत है हमारा तो कोई धर्म नहीं है हम तो सनातनी है जो भारतवर्ष कि जीवनशैली है ये बाद में ये जो संप्रदाय थे सनातन धर्म के बाद में इनको धर्म बनाया

@GarudXGaming

Жыл бұрын

@@patikmahir kaunse gole se aaye ho bhai sanatan koi dharm nahi Hinduism or budhism ke beech ki khichadi hai

Hindu word came in earlier time of attacking mughal era

@bhaktmahakaalka7399

Жыл бұрын

Yes, coz till 712 AD Persia (Sindh ) was ruled by Hindu King ( Raja Dahir),

हिन्दू शब्द ही बाहर से आया है जिसे फ़ारसी और अरबी लोंगो ने इस्तेमाल किया था, हिन्दू शब्द का जिक्र वेद पुराण उपनिषद आदि कहीं भी नहीं है

Kindly make video about western ganga dynasty origin

Sir apke channel ko to trend krna chahiye bahut acha content hai apka

Fir Sindhi ko Sindhi kyo kahte hai unka naam kyo nhi change hua

Sindhu - Hindu. Gujarat & Rajasthan side YES YECH ( S & H ) used synonymous. Even today in North Western Gujarat & Rajasthan same thing is practiced. For example in some region of Gujarat they say SAARU ( accha) and in some area HAARU ( accha). Those days when Alexander the Great invaded India he crossed SINDHU River and stayed there for long time. As per our usage we call it SINDHU. But Gujarat & Rajasthan and north of it they used HINDU word. Hence those who are living near and other side of SINDHU are called HINDUS. Actually Hinduism is SANATAN DHARM. People by usage called Hindus.

A dam built by karikal chola on river caveri its nane is kallanai. This is one among the oldest dam in the world.

Hindu shabd ki baat nahi hindu dharm ki baat ki hain Kamal Hasan ne

Bina reference ke history padhana is like hiding the truth . Your information about the origin of hindu word is indigestible , PLZ provide references

Please mention link where Darius said Hindu?

Thank you very much Bhai.

परशियन स को ह केहते थे, ये क्या लॉजिक हे? कुछभी 🤣🤣🤣🤣 टीचर हो के कथाकार हो? परशिया के नाम मे ही श आता हे इसका मतलब वो लोग स को स ही बोलते थे.

Ekdum shi information... News vale bkvas krte hain

Sir, You have skipped the important part of the origin and their advent in India.

Raja raja Cholan is 100 percent Hindu , he had marriage relationship with nearby Hindu countries

Mani Ratnam is the director of the movie, vetrimaran is another director in Tamil film industry

Hindu is the integration of all sects later. people worshipping Vishnu were kicked out of Tamil Nadu... Don't get confused with Persian Hindu to religion Hindu...

This movie based on a 5 book series of same name by author Kalki Krishnamurthy 1895-1955

दरअसल प्राचीन द्रविड़ सभ्यता का उद्गम स्थल सैंधव घाटी का क्षेत्र था।महान चोल राजा कुलोत्तुंग ने अपने को आभीर कहा है। प्राचीन भारत में शैव वैष्णव ब्राह्मण शाक्त को सामुहिक रूप से हिंदू कहा जाता है

Purani bato ko adhik mahatav dena sirf apnae apko dhoka dena aur Vikas kae raste mae adanga hai.

Shandar sir

@mangalbodele9775

Жыл бұрын

Jain sabse purana dharm he....phir bhuddhism...hindu to nam bhi nh pata tha.... shankaracharya ne hindu dharm ki sthapna ki....ramayan or Mahabharat pehle bhi ....Jain or bhuddhist kathao me sunaye jate the....india me keval bhuddhist University hi kyu banai gyi agar Hinduism itna prominent tha to ...sirf bhuddhism ke University hi kyu banai gyi

This is the same intolerance that gave birth to a lot of rising empires later on in the deccan like Vijayanagara and later the Marathas to protect the sanctity of dharma.

Man liya ki Persian's ne Sindhu ko Hindu kaha par aapne ye nahi bataya ki parsi me Hindu ka matalab kya hota hai sochne wali baat ye bhi hai ki ham Persians ka diya hua sabd kyon apne liye use kare hame apne country ke word ko use Karna chahiye

What is the qualification of Kamal Hasan?

If Saivism -is Not Hinduism, it's like saying "Earth is Flat "or "Sun moves around Earth " !!!!

@rakeshbhagat3632

Жыл бұрын

Saivism came from Buddhism

@rakeshbhagat3632

Жыл бұрын

Hinduism came after Buddhism

@rakeshbhagat3632

Жыл бұрын

@baklol gamer bhuddist stup workship as shivling

@rakeshbhagat3632

Жыл бұрын

@baklol gamer then u don't know anything about Buddhism

@rakeshbhagat3632

Жыл бұрын

search yourself

बिल्कुल सत्य 🙏

Chola was following shavisim saman.. that is totally different than Hinduism btw Hinduism not a religion. Nowhere text .. Bhramanism is an religion that mentioned in manusmriti Veda Ramayan etc

Why are we calling Marathas as father of Indian Navy..

Knowledge gain Chanel.

Now adays it has become fashionable to raise questions about the religion or the origin of the subject which is unnecessary and also irrelevant also regarding who was hindu how this king or person was hindu or anything else .according to me it is to raise controversy among the existing society. Just tell the history of chola dynasty and is this subject is to decide what was Chula dynasty ...?

Kamal Hassan’s logic is - because there was no word “Hindu” in 1000 CE and because it is coined by British, Raja Raja Chola was not Hindu. By this logic nobody was Hindu before British coined the word and Hinduism is very new religion. Also “Homo Sapient” is also a new term not existent at the time of Raja Raja Chola. Therefore he was not a “Homo Sapient” either! In fact all science books who say Homo Sapients left Africa 60,000 years ago are wrong. As there was no word Homo Sapient then. Come to think of it, they were neither human, nor animal, as these words also didn’t exist 60,000 years back! 😅😅😅

sir apne kaha ki sindhu river se east m rahne wale sabhi hindu hai is hisab se hindu is not a religion but collection of multiple communities saivism usme se ek sect hua or wo shiv ke upasak bhi hai to wo ek sect ki bat kar rhe h na ki hindu religion or ap jo explanation de rahe h ap facts hindu religion ke andar include karke religion ko dikha rahe h na ki unka religion bta rahe h i think this is not the justification of hindu religion

@Shiva-zj6od

Жыл бұрын

The oldest religions are like that. Just tgink of roman gods or nordic gods. We recognise them with the place they are from. Do u know the country name islam or Christian. The old releguons don't have name but there is identity which matters the most. For example my name was OM named by my bua but my grandfather repeatedly called me shiva then that name became my identity. Lets say I was called shiva after five years of my age. But will u say that when I was of four years, shiva means I didn't exist. Will u call that. U can say it hindu or not but that identity is always there which believes in bhramha vishnu mahesh as AUM. We don't name anything until we don't find other kind of that thing. Sanatan dharm is that old. Do u know what is the name of our universe.

@sandeepchandsandy3037

Жыл бұрын

u just want to assimilate all the things in one religion just bcoz u want to preserve the hinduism if mahesh vishnu all are same why they were fighting to each other why chola prosecuted the vishnu follower there was no religion only culture and they all wanted legitimacy to rule

@HarshGupta-rs4pl

Жыл бұрын

Thoda about padhlen. Hindu ek general term hai, Hindu is basically Sanatana dharma .

Issam means under one umbrella means everything everybody follow the same behaviour culture life style. Can you combine veg & nonveg under in one umbrella???

And if I am correct pallava dynasty ruled in south india not pahlav ( parthians)

Shaivism , Vaishavism , Sanatani, Lingayats , Arya samajists etc even a KG child knows are Sects of Hinduism

@mtrs598

Жыл бұрын

They are different sects but today's collectively known as hindi dharm. According to padampuran and vishnupuran shiva is shudra. Shiva ko pujne wala bhi shudra ke saman hai. Aur shiva ka prasad grahan karne wala 60000 years tak potti ka kida banega. 😁😁

🚩🚩

Inke dwara banaye mandir me avilokiteswar buddha ki murtiya kyo bani hai

👍🏻

Thanks sir

@SuccessPlusAcademy

Жыл бұрын

Welcome

Jhuth bol rahe ho. Ye sab buddh kalin architechure hai. Ye buddh or boddhisatvo ki murtia hian. Koi bhartiya us samaya ki bhasha ko nahi padh saka. To phir kisne bataya ki ye murtiya natraj hain ya shiv ki hain . Ye buddh or boddhisatvo ki murtiya hain.

Ok super br

Even today there are TAMIL Jains in Tamilnadu. Samanam means jains.

आर्केलोजिवल सर्वे करो और वो भी बाहर के देश के लोगो से पता चलेगा कि सभी बुद्धा के विहार थे।मंदिर नाम का वर्णन वेद उपनिषद पुराण श्रुति कही पर भी नही है जैसे हिंदू शब्द।बस हर वो राजा या बड़ा इंसान याने ब्राह्मण या वैश्य या क्षत्रिय क्यों भाई साहब अब नही चलेगा।।

Samanam is the Tamil name for Jainism. Ancient Tamils followed Jainism.

@chaitanyarakwal9727

Жыл бұрын

Brother Jainism , Buddhism , ajivikas all were part of one tree but now we are becoming Narrow Minded. In India every type of Ideologies were respected .

@ved_bisht

Жыл бұрын

Wrong! Not all Ancient Tamils followed Jainism. Buddhism, Jainism, Vedic Hinduism and Ajivika all were present around the same time. All these religions originated out of Bihar. Every Indian kingdom had people from all these faiths. At one point of time, almost all of Bihar was Buddhist. Buddhism spread across India, Sri Lanka & SE Asia. Jainism spread across India. But after Shankaracharya's spread of Vedas, Hinduism was reestablished as major religion in India. Shankaracharya was from Kerala. He established four mathas in four corners of India.

@chaitanyarakwal9727

Жыл бұрын

@@ved_bisht you are right but Adi Shankaracharya's Hindu religion is different from Today's Hindu religion. I mean he wrote more about Spirituality.

@சுரேஸ்தமிழ்

Жыл бұрын

@@ved_bisht Tamils ​​are not Hindus but Saivas kzread.info/dash/bejne/Ynt_qrKbccuoncY.html The Cholas severely punished those who did not accept Saivism

@ved_bisht

Жыл бұрын

@@சுரேஸ்தமிழ் I think you are extremely jingoistic and spreading misleading facts. I know about Jaffna library, Sangam literature etc. Before Tamils traveled to SE Asia, it was the Kalinga kingdom (Odisha) that sent out ships to Indonesia, Bali and Cambodia. Even the Sinhalese people are originally from Bengal (Vanga kingdom) who were Buddhists. That's why they are majority Buddhists. They call themselves Sinhalese [lion (Singh) people]. Their flag has a lion. There are no lions in Sri Lanka. It's because they remember being from the land of tigers from Sundarbans in Bengal. The history of Vedic Rishis dates before that of Shankaracharya. You should visit Himachal Pradesh, Kashmir and Uttarakhand and you will find ancient temples of Vedic Rishis older than all other kingdoms in India. You should travel more to get a complete idea about entire India.

agar hinduism the to kyon krishna rama and brahma ka nam nahi aaya.

Bhola baba ko puja karne waale.. Aur kaun hote h. ..??? 🤔🤔🤔🤔

Your narratives are not totally based on historical facts although you tried to cover everything possible.

Hindu shabd pehli baar arbi albaruni ne use kiya tha

Persian me bhi to s aata h use h kyon nahi bola unhone sikandar ko hikandar kyon nahi bola Bharat ke logo ke liye hi s ko h me badalte the bilkul galat theory h

अरे भाई 😄! पूरा देश, एशिया महाद्वीप ही हिंदू धर्म संस्कृति वाला था इस्लाम और ईसाई धर्म आने के पहले | सबके पूर्वज सनातनी हिंदू ही है ✊️ जय श्री राम 🙏

@James-Prinsep

Жыл бұрын

Hahaha Teri jati kya hai brahmin key anusar

@akhandbharatrajupaswan123

Жыл бұрын

@@James-Prinsep इससे क्या साबित होगा??

@user-qm5nr3td9r

Жыл бұрын

आप सही कह रहे हैं

@nikhilgaware

Жыл бұрын

Hahaha.. Hindu, hindustan ye Islam ki den he. Jambudvip hi purana naam he. Saman, jain or bouddh yahi Dharm the. Sindhu sabhyata ki bhasha abtak kisi ke samaj me nahi he. Shaiv or vaishnav 8ve shatak ke baad aya.

@akhandbharatrajupaswan123

Жыл бұрын

@@nikhilgaware गजब का अज्ञान है | 4 धाम, 8 मोक्ष पूरी, 12 ज्योतिर्लिंग, 51 शक्ति पीठ आदि लाखो साल पुराना है और इनका उल्लेख हमारे वेदो, पुराणों मे भी है जो की अनादि है | थोड़ा ग्रन्थ पढ़ो भाई

Hum sab ko divide karne ke lie conspiracy h hum sanatani dharm se Bhagwan Shiv lord Hindu ek jeevan sheeli h yog ki trah 🙏🙏🙏👍👍👍🌙🌙🌙☀☀☀

Sarkar badlte hi history badal jati hai😐😄

Aaj ka dhin Andra me Tehsil ko Mandalam kehte hai

How is it fair to say that Hinduism means only vaidic culture or sanathana dharma....it means Tamil language and it's culture is not part of Hinduism.....??

@mtrs598

Жыл бұрын

Vedic period ka koi evidence nhi hai. Aur tamil se pahle sanskrit ka bhi koi evidence nahi milta. Hinduism ka pahla sect hi 7,8 century ke aapas aya shaiva panth. Aur uske 200 300 sal baad vaishanav aye. Pahle dono ladte the apas me par mughlo aur angrezo ke karan unhe apas me ek hona pada aur collectively ye panth hindu dharm kahlate hai. Hinduism lagbagh 1300 sal purana hi hai.

@pskamarajind3865

Жыл бұрын

Yes Tamils are NOT hindus.

@jagadeeswaranr3821

Жыл бұрын

@@pskamarajind3865 thanks for clarifying it....then Arul Mozhi Varman was a great Tamil Ruler

@rakeshbhagat3632

Жыл бұрын

@@mtrs598 you're right

Joot bolre tum, Raja Raj Buddhist tey.. Hindu nahi tey, history ko india ne sahi nahi padarah, bramma, vishnu, se mila neka kosish kare milaya, lekin sachahi yeh hi, chol Raja sabi Buddist tey Dravidian tey Jamboodweepsi desh ki aj India kehetey hi.. Isse yeh sabit hota hi, brahmins sab joot hotey hi.. Ab nahi chalega propoganda joot, kamalhashan sahi kaha.. Tum joot bolre ho..

No, Cholas were not hindus.

They were buddhist...And nothing to do with hinduism..Who believed in mahayaan and vajrayaan Buddhism... AND THE WORD "HINDU" U R PRAPOGATING AGAIN AND AGAIN ,ONLY CAME IN 10TH AD...THIS WORD WAS GIVEN BY TURKISH SCHOLAR ALBURINI.. it's a farsi word and hindu is a derogatory word...And it's funny or u r fooling the indians that they pronounced sindu as hindu ..Sa was called ha..But they could pronounce SHAHANSHAH as Shahnshah and not Hahanshah.. Shaivaism and vaishnaism came into being much later after the death of Adi shankara charya..Ie around 9 th 10th AD.. *Not only ideals and morals but also temples were taken over by Brahmins* About the ideals and morals taken up by Brahmanism to make it stand among the people of this country, L.M.Joshi further observes: "Speaking of Buddhist ascetic ideals and institutions, Swami Vivekananda has said that the monastic vow and renunciation began to be preached all over India since the time of the Buddha, and Hinduism has absorbed into itself this Buddhist spirit of renunciation. The ochre robe found a lasting home in Hinduism also. The Hindu teacher not only accepted the Buddhist institution of monks. They occupied the Buddhist monasteries also. The many monasteries that you now see in India occupied by monks were once in the possession of Buddhism. The Hindus have only made them their own now by modifying them in their own fashion. Really speaking, the institution of Samnyasa originated with the Buddha. In conclusion the Swami has stated that Hinduism has become so great only by absorbing all the ideal of the Buddha. Swami Vivekananda has been a pivotal figure in modern Hinduism and his opinions are representative of the educated Hindus." [Ibid:348, emphasis ours] Though Hinduism has borrowed all these tenets from Buddhism, it is still different from Buddhism. Joshi observes: "Although modern Hindu culture has a great many elements of the Buddhist culture, the two are not identical. The Hindus consider the Buddha as a maker of Hinduism and worship Him as an avatara of God; Hinduism has accepted all the great and noble elements of Buddhism. These facts do not alter the historical truth that Buddhism is different from Hinduism and Hinduism is different from Buddhism. The Hindus may worship the Buddha, because their religion is largely based on the teachings of the Buddha. The Buddhists do not worship either Vishnu or Siva, not is their religion based on the Vedas." [Joshi:p.330] Temple institution is the creation of the Buddhist people and to grab that glory the Brahmins have usurped the Buddhists Temples for their selfish purpose and to attract the masses and then have converted those temples into Hindu forms making necessary changes and alterations. A good number of authorities have proved long ago and many of the authorities on the subject like R. G. Bhandarkar, Percy Brown, G. S. Ghurey, L. M. Joshi, D. D. Kosambi, K. A. N. Sastri, K. R. Vaidyanthan and others have been taken into consideration in the spirit and letters they presented numerous sources and evidences. So far the story of Lord of Tirumalai stands historically and on the basis of the available sources it is a Buddhist Shrine. Right from its name, fashions and styles, so also customs like the Tonsure, offering of hair and Rathyatra it is all in one - the Buddhist way. Rathayatra is not originated in the Brahmanical life due to caste system and observance of untouchability and touch no one those who even from your kin and kith if they are unbathed and the women of their blood also. Under the circumstances Rathayatra tradition is certainly of the Buddhist origin and where ever it is carried on, the places and gods are the Buddhists, without any doubt. The author K. Jamanadas has maintained throughout his work a very high standard of argument and at all instances he placed either the authorities or the evidence in support of his argument and statements. Although in the socio-cultural life of this country, it introverts all of those who have their origin in this land, to positively come up for better understanding as if it is vicissitude as the times and culture demand. A good lesson will also be derived out of the reading of this thesis for making this land as if of one people with an appeal to both the Hindus and the Muslims to know their best of heritage and noble humane way of life in Buddhism as one people, blessed and guided eternally by that Great, Supreme Lord, Bhagwan Buddha, the great.

Kamal hasan, iska original name hai kamalahasan. Ye tho apna maa baap dhiyawala nam koiye badaldala. History ka baarimein ye paagal kya jaantha.

NA HI NADI KA NAAM HI SINDHU HAI AUR NA HI HAM SAB HHINDU HAIN NA HI YAH HINDUSTAN HAI NA HI HAM SAB HINDU HIND KA ASTITAV THA HI NAHI JAGO BHUMIHEEN GULAMO JAGO MOOL WASIO JAGO HAM GULAM HO GAYE PASCHIM KE AAJ YAH PASCHIM ARAB TAK KABAJ HO GAYA ARAB ME GULAM JATE HAIN AAJ KE PAK YA BHARAT YA BANGLADESH SE ARAB KI AABADI KA MATRA 12% BI AABADI WAHAN KI NAGRIK BAKI SAB BAHAR SE JANE Wale KAMGAR YANI SERVENTS YANI GULAMA TO JAGNA HOGA EK EK KO JAGO GULAMO JAGO YAHWN BHI UNKI HAI BAANI HUII COLONY

Ponniyin selvan film के निर्देशक वेट्रीमारन नहीं हैं जैसाकि आप कह रहे हैं। उक्त फिल्म के निर्देशक मणिरत्नम हैं जोकि उसके निर्माता भी हैं। ध्यान दिया जाए कि फिल्म में यह नहीं कहा गया कि राजराज चोळन हिंदू राजा नहीं थे।

complete bakvas SANGAM HAS NO PROPER EXPLANATION IN HINDI NOR SANSKRIT

@devithomala

Жыл бұрын

Sorry but GREATEST RULER RAVANA THE GREAT HAS SOLID proof of existence in Lanka but.....???

Ur naration loose the main point that ia whether they were Hindus or not . unnecessary narration is useless

सबसे पुराना गोंडवाना

Yeh Vivaad Sirf Bakwaas he

Chol vans sanatani the Aaj jinhe Hindu kaha jata hai

They should be thankful to North Indians, they got a buffer state to have remained safe from Muslim Invations.

@sanathan4072

Жыл бұрын

Lol

Hindu sabd muskil se 300sal purana hai Chol dainest budhist the.

Hindu ko Bada chadake Bata Rahe ho.. Total galat.

Buddhist they chola samrajya Aap galat pada rahe hai

Ask all the finacers ,bastu ya pani pe.

Darius saud indu

Kamal ek murkh hai

Kamalhasankiniyatqaraabhai"hinduonkigalatraastadikaanaaurmuslimkagulaambannashokhai

Bhartiyo ki apni koi identity nhi hai kya .

@HarshGupta-rs4pl

Жыл бұрын

Bharatiya hi identity hai

@blossom_4849

Жыл бұрын

Hum bharat rajake namse bharat desh ko janate hai yahi hamary identy hai

Cholas suryakula kshatriyas the

@VELTROS

Жыл бұрын

Yes

चोल साम्राज्य बुद्ध धर्म के अनुयायी थे। उनके मठों, विहारों को अखाड़े बनाकर लुटा गया और उसे मंदिर में बदल दिया गया।आज भी बुद्ध की प्रतिमाओं और स्तुपो को शिव, विष्णु और विभिन्न अवतारों के नाम से पूजा जा रहा है। बुद्ध के वज्रयान शाखा में बुद्ध की भव्य मूर्तियां बनाई जाती थी।

@rajeshkumarbarange988

Жыл бұрын

सम्राट अशोक के साहित्य लंका गमन का तब इतिहास या शिलालेख पढो का अध्ययन करो तब बोलना ??

@Bihari-S

Жыл бұрын

@@rajeshkumarbarange988 सम्राट अशोक के समय कोई हिन्दू धर्म था इसका कोई ठोस प्रमाण बताओ। मुगल और ब्रिटिश काल मे लिखे गए रामायण, पुराण या किसी संस्कृत ब्राह्मण ग्रंथो से सबूत मत देना। कोई पुरातात्विक, अभिलेख, सिक्के, मुहर जैसा कोई साक्ष्य देना।

@rajeshkumarbarange988

Жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/dnlpy9OPn8_Tc6w.html

@HarshGupta-rs4pl

Жыл бұрын

ये लो एक नये पैगम्बर पैदा हो गये। सुमित जी ने इतना अच्छी तरह से बताया पर इस बेवकूफ को समझ में नहीं आया। बौद्ध धर्म का विस्तार दक्षिण में अशोक या चंद्र गुप्त काल में हुआ। मूर्तियों की संरचना चोला और होयसेला काल में अलग रही है जिनमें तमिल या कन्नड़ भाषा के अभिलेख मिलते हैं जबकि अशोक काल में पाली भाषा चलती थी।

@patikmahir

Жыл бұрын

🤣🤣 गौतम बुद्ध भिखारी🤣🤣

Kamal Hasan said hindu religion name given by Britishers..... I think your explanation is misleading

@mtrs598

Жыл бұрын

Hindu name given by Persian and arabian for the subcontinent's people. Oldest name of this religion is brahmin dharma later known as vedic dharma after that in British period it's called as Hindu dharma.

@jagadeeswaranr3821

Жыл бұрын

@@mtrs598agreed.. initially it was used for geographical identity.... Britishers used it in the religious context to administer all the various cultures except Christian Islam and parsi....you and Kamal Hasan are correct bro...Thanks

Om Shri ganeshay namah 🙏 Saptarshiyo mein se Agastya Rishi ko Father of Tamilian kaha jata hai.. Hadappa Wadappa to sub baad mein aayen.. Aur yeh Kamal Haasan Jaisey kaccharey, EV Periyar ideology waley hai.. yeh Dravidian aur Aryan theory sub Angrejo ka den hai aur Periyar Jaise chamgadado ne apni siyasat chamkaney ke liyein khela gaya patta hain.. Har Har Mahadev 💪🚩 Vandey Mataram 🇮🇳💪 Jai Hind 💪🇮🇳

Who is Lord Shiva? One of the God of SANATAN DHARM.

Moovendars (Chera, Choza, Pandya ) are Nasthika ruler's. There is no hindu at this age. Aseevagam religion is the main at this time.

गलत इतिहास है ओसामा में दूध कहां गए बुध का समय कब से कब तक था यह कौन बताएगा

Cholas ka family tree Or ancestory bhi dikhao aur wo gujjar khajar afgani pratihars nhi gurjar pratihar hai gurjar title of gujrat and pratihara a major clan of Agnivanshiye kshatriya

🚩🚩