The Capital Structure Irrelevance Theory by Modigliani & Miller
The session discusses the MM Theory of Capital Structure irrelevance
Жүктеу.....
Пікірлер: 25
@ShailBhatt-pk1jb3 ай бұрын
Absolutely amazing explanation.
@theanmol17043 жыл бұрын
Absolutely amazing explanation
@rafaelhorstharaujo13794 жыл бұрын
such a great teacher!!
@abhishektamang34985 жыл бұрын
it was awsome sir thanks alotttttt.
@vasudhapareek92015 жыл бұрын
The explanation couldn't have been any better! Kudos!
@AVCLearning
5 жыл бұрын
Many thanks
@mahimachopra26064 жыл бұрын
Very Helpful 👏 ThankYouSoMuch✨
@hellspores223 ай бұрын
Great explanation, thank you. But why have was 12% use for Ke? Although it is for the sake of the argument as you have said, the debt costs are already included in ROE figure. So isn't that that understating the Ke by a lot? As it should be 40,000/10,000 = 40% rather than 12%. Would the outcome be the same whether it is 12% or 40%?
@sheilasleigh97363 жыл бұрын
THANK YOU!
@SpencerKimber3 жыл бұрын
Mind. Blown.
@AVCLearning
3 жыл бұрын
Many thanks.
@yashshah53394 жыл бұрын
Where is the video on traditional view on wacc?
@muskanmakhija69792 жыл бұрын
So much noice distirbance is there
@paulm69954 жыл бұрын
aag lagadiya bhaut aacha padhaya
@neenamarcellines58284 жыл бұрын
Sir u r giving the presentation vry nice but the so much space btw those words it's making me to skip those seconds
@AVCLearning
4 жыл бұрын
My apologies for the challenges faced. Will try to ensure that these issues are addressed in future
@neenamarcellines5828
4 жыл бұрын
@@AVCLearning tq sir
@lifeisbeautiful3019
Жыл бұрын
Speed 1.5 x best
@sohailazmi83555 жыл бұрын
Why didn't you minus his previous income from his current income, the difference of the previous and current income is said to as arbitrage gain if current income exceeds previous income
@sohailazmi8355
5 жыл бұрын
Kindly clear my query, and if taxes are applicable, will there not be any opportunity for arbitrage gain?
@pnpark2 жыл бұрын
in what world are there NO TAXES is this then for non-profits???
@viralalert87132 жыл бұрын
Funny thing how business lessons are being taught by people who never actually ran a business in their lives...
@muskanmakhija69792 жыл бұрын
We know that u know english but now please explain in hindi also
Пікірлер: 25
Absolutely amazing explanation.
Absolutely amazing explanation
such a great teacher!!
it was awsome sir thanks alotttttt.
The explanation couldn't have been any better! Kudos!
@AVCLearning
5 жыл бұрын
Many thanks
Very Helpful 👏 ThankYouSoMuch✨
Great explanation, thank you. But why have was 12% use for Ke? Although it is for the sake of the argument as you have said, the debt costs are already included in ROE figure. So isn't that that understating the Ke by a lot? As it should be 40,000/10,000 = 40% rather than 12%. Would the outcome be the same whether it is 12% or 40%?
THANK YOU!
Mind. Blown.
@AVCLearning
3 жыл бұрын
Many thanks.
Where is the video on traditional view on wacc?
So much noice distirbance is there
aag lagadiya bhaut aacha padhaya
Sir u r giving the presentation vry nice but the so much space btw those words it's making me to skip those seconds
@AVCLearning
4 жыл бұрын
My apologies for the challenges faced. Will try to ensure that these issues are addressed in future
@neenamarcellines5828
4 жыл бұрын
@@AVCLearning tq sir
@lifeisbeautiful3019
Жыл бұрын
Speed 1.5 x best
Why didn't you minus his previous income from his current income, the difference of the previous and current income is said to as arbitrage gain if current income exceeds previous income
@sohailazmi8355
5 жыл бұрын
Kindly clear my query, and if taxes are applicable, will there not be any opportunity for arbitrage gain?
in what world are there NO TAXES is this then for non-profits???
Funny thing how business lessons are being taught by people who never actually ran a business in their lives...
We know that u know english but now please explain in hindi also