I own an R10 and loving it. Btw, hands down the best R7-R10 comparison video out there, and not to mention the overall video and production (and audio) quality! Great work!

@alex_nita

6 ай бұрын

Hey, do you use it for landscapes?

Your video is really the best comparison between these two cameras, thanks a lot!!

Great informative, yet ‘down to earth’ style video. I've ordered an R10 with 18-150mm lens now instead of R7 as there is so little difference in most scenarios of my photography as confirmed by what you have demonstrated. Look forward to watching lots more of your videos to continue to learn and confirm ive made the right choice(s). admit am little worried about using third party lenses via adapter but will read up on what other real users experience have used. A Setup and advised settings video would be great to see for an R10 now.

Thank you so much Mark for the comparison video, very informative for me! God bless you and good luck!

nice and great video on to the point from the very first second!

Excellent video! I am currently trying to determine which mirrorless camera to buy and this helped me considerably. Just subscribed.

Fantastic review, thanks you. I have just Subscribed!

Excellent review just what I needed.

Congrats for this great video. Very useful!

You have to remember there isn’t a small difference in price between the R10 and R7 but a big leap (R10 body is £899 and R7 body is £1449 in the UK) And no camera will make a dull boring subject look amazing. I own a R10 and it does everything I need. From my own experience of using a R10 I can’t think of anything I miss or would change. I’d save the money for Canons ridiculously priced RF lenses and accessories.

Thanks for sharing your thoughts on these 2 cameras. Your review helped me decide which camera I wanted. I got a really good deal on the body and lens for the R7. Now it's time for accessories. Thanks again

Outstanding video Mark, really appreciate your comporative points and particularly the bonus R7 vs. RP. You've really broken down exactly what I want to know when comparing cameras. Happy New Year! Happy Shooting!

Great video and excelled presentation. As a possible R10 buyer it was extremely helpful. Many thanks.

Great review, thank you

A very interesting, and thought provoking feature. I am in the market and am tempted by the R7.

Thanks very much for the detailed review. I purchased the R7 for a specific reason because I invested heavily on the Canon glass (both EF & RF). The R7 give me a longer reach when using for wildlife. However, I likely wouldn’t buy the R7 if Canon announced the stoppage of 3rd party glass at the same time they unveiled the R7/R10. Also, I see it as a business decision Canon made and no others have the courage to make?

I just love this guy...he is a great teacher

Thanks for a very comprehensive review. I apologize for the length of this comment, but I thought I would share my experience. For several years, I loved my M6 II, which I used for birding with the Tamron 100-400 Di VC and Sigma 150-600C. But I upgraded to the R7, on the strength of its IBIS and bird-eye tracking autofocus. I also purchased the RF 100-500 as my primary birding lens. I have not been disappointed. Although the R10 was also a contender, I suffer from progressive neurological shake, and the IBIS cooperates well with lens OIS, which was a deal-maker for me. That said, a friend uses the R10, and his bird photos are exquisite so YMMV. As for the rear joystick/dial on the R7, I have come to prefer it because it falls naturally under my thumb and is easily re-assigned - I use the dial for exposure compensation and the joystick for cursor movement. The weather sealing, sensor curtain, larger battery, 32 MP sensor resolution, and dual card slots also justify the price premium IMO. I regularly shoot video for canine agility, and the absence of a 30 minute video limit is also an advantage, as is the 4K image-quality from the over-sampled signal - the M6 II also promises 4K, but the image is noticeably softer due to line skipping. Using the RF 18-150 for video, I find the IBIS helpful compared to the M6 II. I obviously have complaints: the slow read-out speed makes for rolling shutter, and the light-weight body makes for shutter shake. Both are easily avoided by using the mechanical or first curtain electronic shutter, respectively, which still provide an impressive 15 fps. I also wish the EVF had higher resolution, so I could better judge image quality in the field. But overall, I think that's its a stellar birding set-up, especially in its price range.

thank you Mark for your information about the R10. I'm a nature photographer and I think I'll go for the R10! I now shoot my photos with a Canon M50 and a Sigma 150-600 con lens, and I must say this is going quite well for me! However, I want bird detection, and I don't have that on my m50, so!. I think this is the best choice!. Greetings Joop Sack from the Netherlands.

Thank you for the amazing content. What do you prefer for content creation Fx30 or the R7?

25:40 - one of my Grandy's cameras! :) I've got an old lens from him recently, will test it fully when I'll get the adapter. Soviet lenses has their own interesting character with some major issues of course.

Mark, You mention looking for higher quality lenses that will perform well on the R7, with it's ultra high resolution sensor. I can't help with RF glass, but Canon put out a list of lenses they recommended for the 50MP 5DS and 5DS-R, back when they introduced those cameras. That might serve as a useful guide of what EF glass would adapt best on the R7. It's a minor thing for many people, but you didn't mention that the R10 has a built-in, pop up flash (though it's pretty anemic). The R7 doesn't have a built-in flash (which may help with its weather resistance). Overall, a very interesting comparison! I wasn't aware the R10 didn't close the shutter to protect the sensor when the lens is removed! Shame on Canon for that. That should be a standard feature on all mirrorless, IMO. I noticed the size and weight of the R7 early on. In fact its footprint is so close to that of several of the full frame models, I was best disappointed Canon didn't make the R7 compatible with the BG-R10 battery grip they use. The capacity of the batteries may not concern you, but shooting sporting events I sometimes take 3000, 4000 or more shots in a day. And I want to do as few battery changes as possible. I also like the vertical grip itself and the secondary controls, shooting a lot in portrait orientation, and so use battery grips on all my DSLRs. Anyway, thank you for the very thorough and well presented comparison Mark. I'm sure a lot of people will find it quite useful!

@markwiemels

Жыл бұрын

Good insight, thanks for sharing it. The matching battery grip would have been great, I agree.

Thank you this was super helpful. I was thinking I needed the R7 for the IBIS and higher MP sensor but it seems like with an IS kit lens it’s not going to make significant difference. Also I have tiny hands so the R10 might work out better in that regard, plus it’s more travel sized and leaves a bit of budget left for an extra battery and the converter mount so I can use my old lenses.

@markwiemels

10 ай бұрын

R10 is honestly such a great camera.

Some great thoughts in this video! I came searching for it after reading quite a recent... 5D3 vs 7D2 vs 90D thread on dpreview forums. At one point the commenters said why the hell bother if you can have a new r10 for almost the price 5D3 or 90D. I love your views on AF being the same and lack of IBIS not being a problem with stabilised lenses. I shoot Olympus E-M1 mark II and love the IBIS, but also have some EF lenses, so I'm tempted to look for a bargain R10 and adapt 70-300mm L white chunky boy to it😂

very detailed and useful review

@markwiemels

Жыл бұрын

Thanks.

Thank you for this useful comparison 👍🏼👍🏼. Would have been useful to compare the kit lenses as well.

@markwiemels

Жыл бұрын

Thanks for the reminder, I need to make a video to compare the lenses.

Since you mentioned other camera's at that price range, can you please do a comparison of the R10 vs the Z30? This will probably be more on the video side

Mark, you've provided a very clear and thorough comparison! I'm getting into macro photography, with flash. My Canon 7D Mark II has a fast drive mode of 10fps, but with the flash unit is too heavy, while my Canon T3 with flash is of lighter weight, but with meager fps. PLUS, I've back and hip pain to deal with when trying to deal with subjects (flowers/insects) low to the ground. SO - I've been considering a lightweight, mirrorless camera, not only for the weight factor, but also because my cameras don't have articulating screens - and it's difficult to focus via "Live view" when one is not at the same level as the camera. So- I've been considering the R10, however you say that the screen is "blurry" and not well lit -so I'm concerned about it's use for macro - what would be your recommnendation - without a humongous pricetag? It should be obvious all of my lenses have EF mounts, and my macro (Tokina ATX-i 100mm f2.8 FF) has an EF mount.

dam straight to the point

Hi Mark, can you please test the Kinokoo PU Leather Case for Canon EOS M6 Mark II, Walimex Pro easyCover for Canon EOS M, Kinokoo Silicone Case for Canon EOS R, and DiCaPac WP-S5 Outdoor/Underwater Bag, for example.

Great channel. I have followed you for years. I consider you the expert on everything EOS-M. My question is: Is the R10 a good replacement for the M5? A short bit of background: my main camera is a 5D2, which I use for paid work (yes, I'm still not sold on EVFs), and my travel cameras are the M5 and G5X. I know I should get something in the EOS-R, but I'm reluctant. As for my M5, I have the beautiful 22mm, the Sigma trio, and the fantastic 11-22mm, along with actually all the official EOS-M lenses from Canon, and I can't really see any replacement for some of them on the EOS-R just yet. I also like that the Canon batteries I have for my M5 fit the R10. In reality, I do find the M5 too small, as I run the 5D2 with battery grip and love the size and weight, but for travel, I can forgo the size. So what is a true replacement, in your view, for the M5?

Great review, I ordered the R7 with the Sigma 150-600mm and a friend has the R10 with the 100-400mm. I take more wildlife photos and they take more portraits. We will go to zoos together. We are looking forward to it, both switched from bridge camera to system camera. Lots of good tips, thank you. Greetings from Belgium

@markwiemels

Жыл бұрын

I have seen a number of reports of IBIS conflicting with the lens IS on the Sigma lenses, just heads up. If you google it you should be able to find more info.

@augusti1

Жыл бұрын

@@markwiemels it's always trail and error I think 😁

what a great video, i will love to have the R7 but here in Mexico R7 is a little bit expensive

The 32mp sensor also introduces defraction alot sooner than the 24mp sensor so if your stopping down your lens for landscape you might find its softer than at the same f stop on a lower mp sensor. Chris frost proved this by testing the 17-55 2.8 on a r7.

My m50 mkii w/ Tt artisan manual lenses has made me money. It with an ef to efm adapter, partnered with some premium sigma lenses has made me a little side money. You can get good images out of almost any modern camera.

@markwiemels

Жыл бұрын

Very true.

Hi there! Thanks for your vídeos! I've been watching some of your content that I've found quite valuable. Can you share your thoughts about where the EOS-M line stands today after the launch of the EOS-R 50, maybe a vídeo about it? Thank you for your time.

@markwiemels

Жыл бұрын

I will try to do this soon.

Considering what these costs, the nit picking issues should fall to the side. These options are competitive.

Which one is better in low light high iso?

Great video! am an intermediate photographer looking to buy the R7, and will mainly be pairing it with the 70-300mm F4-5.6 L lens

@buggersofoz

26 күн бұрын

Awesome, did you end up getting the R7? After watching the video I'm tempted to adapt the same lens on an R10. Would love to hear your impressions.

26:00 - I've thought that the noise reduction in full frame Canons is fully controllable! I can completely switch off NR in my XT-3. One big con it has: no cheap 50mm AF fixes and no budget 18-150 analog. Really good and wide range zooms for Fuji are hell-expensive!

Side entry cards slot and linear pixel density of the R7, plus better evf and screen are winning points. Typo in the list, 1.62 million dot screen.

I wish I would be able to buy a R7 here in Germany, But they are on backorder. I Have a order placed in May. No luck yet.

I'm considering the R10 as an upgrade to my SL1. My only concern is that there are no third-party lenses available. This means that getting a macro, a telephoto, and 24 - 105 in the RF series will cost me about $CDN3500. I expect I would probably end up sticking with my EF series with the adapter for years longer as a result and having to live with the implications of that issue. My alternative is to just upgrade to an SL3 and wait for probably about a decade for Canon to decide to license the RF to third parties at a likely equivalent cost then upgrade to whatever is the equivalent of an R10 at that time. Given these scenarios, I could also just upgrade my phone to the iPhone 16 Pro for about $CDN800 with loyalty credits applied by my carrier.

Hello! Which flashlights should I buy for Canon EOS K7?

The one difference I did notice in high iso is that R7 does hold color information better than R10. R10 after 6400 starts getting a bit more magenta, especially in the blacks. And R7 still keeps more true to the tone.

@markwiemels

Жыл бұрын

Yes, I agree, we did pick that as well. I thought it was noticeable side by side but stand alone it was harder to pick.

@Jordan-ts6lh

Жыл бұрын

The problem at 6400 iso is the color info?!?!? Not grain? That's impressive, I'm still here with my m50 😮‍💨

Excelenre video, muy bien detallado. Tu que sabes mucho de cámaras, sabiendo que muchos fotografos profesionales trabajan con apsc ¿tu consideras la R7 ¿buena oara retratos? Un youtuber James Reader, dijo que los lentes RF no sirven para fotografía en ka R7, para videos sí. Explíca que los lenres RF estan dusrñados para full frame, y que por eso no son buenos en fotografía para la R7, que es apsc. Lamentablemente, los objetivos RFS, ideales para la R7 no hay, solo dos, y de baja calidad. Por otro lado, tu dices que hay que usar lenres caros, para qur la R7 funcione bien en fotografía. ¿Qué dices al respecto tu que sabes más de fotigrafía?

Revisiting the video again ❤😊 man I love the size of the R10 but I know the R7 is for me maybe I should just get both 😂

i use canon m6m2, i was thinking to upgrade to r7. I will not do this because I do not want to use adapters. Canon does't have such cool lenses as sigma 18-50 2.8, tamron 17-70-2.8, viltrox 13 mm 1.4. I will wait for new Sony APS-C cameras

Great comparison video, thanks for sharing! Another fair point about R7 IBIS vs R10 no IBIS (for photos); realistically there are only 2 RF lenses without IS that APS-C shooters would consider: RF 16mm f2.8 and RF 50mm f1.8. All the other f1.8 / f2 primes have IS, and honestly who’s going to spend near $3k for an RF 1.2 prime on either of these cameras? Similar concept for RF zooms… other than the heavyweight 28-70 f2, literally every other native zoom has IS right? So basically if you can live without the 16m 2.8 and 50m 1.8, the R7’s IBIS has zero impact for pictures 🤯

@rumbo2263

Жыл бұрын

i was scrolling thru the comments for exactly this information. but just to be doubly clear without all the photographer-jargon ... r7 IBIS/ image stabilisation has NO impact on birding/ wildlife photos so might as well save 500 bucks and go in for a r10?? please confirm soonest- buying one of these in this week :)

@bruck177

Жыл бұрын

@@rumbo2263 hey, I haven't used an R7 yet however I have read the R7 does indeed have a slight improvement in image sharpness due to camera shake vs the r10, even though the 100-400 lens does most of the heavy lifting regarding camera shake. I'd guess it's maybe 0.5 to 1.0 stops improvement... Though tbh I'd really like to try it out in the real world as no one seems to have done that specifically! The R7 also has 40% more pixels, meaning its image has to be sharper else camera shake blur will appear more easily. Good luck with your decision. My vote would be with the R10 & put the funds toward a better lens... Maybe the EF 100-400?

@rumbo2263

Жыл бұрын

@@bruck177 👌

@rumbo2263

Жыл бұрын

you mean the RF 100-400? or stick to EF ?

@gauravgoel8092

8 ай бұрын

Really a very nice informaion.many points helpedme here. One funny thought I have got. R10 and an action camera like Action 4 will cover all scenarios?

Good review Mark. I'm sure others have asked too, but how much better is the R10/R7 image quality (for photos, not video) compared to the M50?

@markwiemels

Жыл бұрын

I have not done a side by side test, but I will. I suspect you there will be a noticeable difference at higher iso, but not lower, but that’s a guess. Tests and video to come.

Thanks for great Video. Is it possible to use this Mount Adapter EF-EOS R on the R10?

@markwiemels

Жыл бұрын

Yes

After trying both the cameras i think the r10 is a better buy. For twice the price I expect better build and weather sealing, buffer, autofocus, rolling shutter

What lens would you use instead of the kit lens on R7 for videos and photos for fine art painting indoors?

@markwiemels

Жыл бұрын

I like the RF 35mm f1.8, good for lower light and gives a nice image. I have not tested the 24 f1.8, but it might be good, see if you can find a review of someone testing the 24 f1.8 on the R7.

You get too hung up what the IBIS can't do. What it does with EF lenses such as the 400mm f/5.6L USM is stabilising the viewfinder quite effectively - I need the short shutter speed for moving subjects anyways but the composition and focusing becomes easier with it...

@markwiemels

Жыл бұрын

Yes, it will help with that.

8:25 I'm not sure covering the sensor is a smart thing to do. The fact is that cleaning the sensor is ​​now much easier than removing dirt from the shutter curtains.

Hi may I know what is the maximum iso u will recommend to shoot with the R10 and R7? How are they compared to say dslr canon crop sensor?

@markwiemels

Жыл бұрын

It really depends the the scene, but I think 6400 in video and 12800 in photos is about as high as I would want to go. Yes they are better than the older cameras, but I think that is mostly image processing in the camera.

Most definitely prefer the clicky buttons

I have r10 and thinking to trade for r7 but thanks to this video i convinced i will keep my r10 and wait to sigma rf 18-50mm 2.8 😀 the down side is the ibis but i only do photography no video

@yehwahua

2 ай бұрын

Hi, i thinking about buying th r10. It would be great for beginner? I need it for events. Mostly indoor but also outdoor. And lighting is important to me. Overall it good?

Another thing CanonR 10 doesn't have register recall Function which the R 7 have.

Honestly, I’ve decided from r10 and r50, I have chosen the r10. As someone with small hands, I think the r10 is best for me. I also prefer the click of the r10

great video mark, was going through the comments, but just to be doubly clear without all the photography-jargon ... r7 IBIS/ image stabilisation has NO impact on birding/ wildlife photos so might as well save 500 bucks and go in for a r10?? please confirm soonest- buying one of these in this week :)

@markwiemels

Жыл бұрын

At longer focal lengths, with an image stabilised lens, it does almost nothing. So I would save the money and put it into a lens.

Which lens would you recommend for the r7 when making YT videos?

@markwiemels

Жыл бұрын

There really are not many good choices right now. Hopefully canon will release new lenses soon,

Of course you are going to see them with the kit lenses, as they are pretty much the only native crop sensor glass for those. Shutting down third party lenses and then not making any yourself is a big middle finger to any customer..

With the animal eye AF I'm thinking the R7/R10 + RF 100-400 mm might be a fantastic combo for beginner bird/wildlife photography. Especially for the price.

@joandreas1490

Жыл бұрын

keeping that 100-400 unless i suddenly swap to fuji 100-400. in low weight and pricing category it will be hard to beat.

@eivinstens6091

Жыл бұрын

@@joandreas1490 Never underestimate light weight. 😎😎👍👍

@markwiemels

Жыл бұрын

Agree.

@markwiemels

Жыл бұрын

@Joandreas I have the Fuji 100-400 and am considering the canon RF 100-400. What are your thoughts about how these lenses compare?

@joandreas1490

Жыл бұрын

​@@markwiemels Not had any fujii yet. as tamron 150-500 got released for fuji x i might consider it above r7(long wait time + extra lens budget made r10 an easy choice)

Would think that fuji x-s10 would be better than r10 if not doing anything quick or macro. s10 got 15 min as min shutter. Could mention fuji x-h2 being nearly a better upgrade to r10 than r7 on video alone. might want swap as adapter is pita on it at moment.

@markwiemels

Жыл бұрын

I would love to compare those cameras, if I can get my hands on an x-s10, I will. I don’t think there would be a straight winner, I think they would be better at different things.

I wonder why canon makes their future camera mount so big that prevents them to make a compact camera in the future using that mount?

@markwiemels

Жыл бұрын

Yea, a bit disappointing. Having said that, the R10 is much smaller than I expected it would be.

This comparison isn't fair because these are two different classes of cameras. It's like you'd compare Fiat Panda and Hinda Civic.

Should i consider buying an R7? I havd the Canon 550D for a little over 10 years. I want to do some shortfilm and sometimes take pictures of wildlife🤔

@markwiemels

Жыл бұрын

It would be a massive upgrade, yes you should consider it.

I know that its a year later, but the r10 can charge through usb-c

it is so sad you can't use the EOS M lenses on here!!!

Im a fuji user... I might be switch to canon, but there is no lens for their apsc lineup :( So in the end id rather switch to sony)) Damnit autofocus :(

As excited I was to get the R7 for holidays the fact that they are clamping down on 3rd party lenses and the lack of native lenses selection really made me not consider the camera. Yeah I can get an adapter and pick other lenses but in reality I don't want to add that one more item. So my money will go somewhere else but not sure where yet

@markwiemels

Жыл бұрын

Look at Fuji X-T4 and Sony A7C, A7II as well.

@dominman

Жыл бұрын

@@markwiemels yeah I'm also looking at the a7iv slightly more then I was thinking but hey why not

Man there’s so much innovation and so much messiness that’s why I’m a canon shooter it’s like a toxic relationship 😂❤

@markwiemels

Жыл бұрын

lol.. so True.

@LouisLuzuka

Жыл бұрын

@@markwiemels 😭😅🤣🤣

What will help the R7 is a battery grip, Canon fumbled the ball during it's release.

i think it's nonsense investing an aps-c camera for r7 too much, r10 is at the sweet spot for an aps-c. after r10 full frame at least r8 can be next step.

Will I lose warranty on r10 if I install cinestyle?

@markwiemels

Жыл бұрын

No, canon cameras are designed to add custom profiles.

@saviofernandez1606

Жыл бұрын

@@markwiemels thankyou for the fast reply ❤️

R10 Vs m50

@markwiemels

Жыл бұрын

Yes, I will make this video.

Can we trust your opinion on the best canon camera to use when you're not even using one to film this video.... Is the Fuji camera better than the canon? And by the way the affiliate link for your Portkeys PT5 II Touchscreen Camera Field Monitor is outdated and no longer available....

@markwiemels

Жыл бұрын

In a studio environment, with controlled lighting, almost any camera will do. In fact, in most cases you can’t tell them apart. Since I have the Canon cameras in the shoot, to talk about them, I’m not using them to recoded the video, that is why I included the video samples.

If I wanted a great video camera I would buy one why buy a sill camera to do video o think you just need a decent video I not trying to be a movie producer I think they should put more effort in making better sill I don't see alot of different in dslr than the mirror less cameras that was thay should be working on

@markwiemels

Жыл бұрын

In the past 10-15 years, very little have changed on the photo side.

R10 vs zve10!

@markwiemels

Жыл бұрын

I will be making that video at some point soon.

I shoot 1300 photos with a battery charge on my R10. For real!

R7 is one sagenent above I think

no flash sync ports on cannons now cant trigger my old units , good bye cannon

wish the r10 had a better sensor

@markwiemels

Жыл бұрын

In most cases you can not pick the photos apart from the R7.

Canon R10 vs iphone 14 Pro: who wins?

@markwiemels

Жыл бұрын

Yah, R10 for sure.

Funny enough, the R7 is weather sealed, but the kit lenses do not!

@markwiemels

Жыл бұрын

I know! It's a little annoying.

Как говаривал один мой коллега: "Одновременно делать фото и видео - это всё равно, что заниматься сексом сразу с двумя женщинами ... которые находятся в разных комнатах".

The difference isnt the megapíxels? And better low light on the r7?

@markwiemels

Жыл бұрын

No, I cover that, it's the least important factor.

incoming R7. iam so afraid :)

@markwiemels

Жыл бұрын

You will be happy with it, great camera.

R7 is useless with current lens lineup and the ban on third party glass by canon

@markwiemels

Жыл бұрын

It is disappointing, wouldn't go as far as useless.

@DavidPetryk

Жыл бұрын

@@markwiemels yes ok I agree; not completely useless to some.

@rayl801

8 ай бұрын

The fact that you can purchase an effective to rf mount adapter to use ef lenses of any manufacturer on a Canon rf mirror less camera makes the "useless" comment nonsensical. I own an R5 and am able to use all of my ef mount lenses, both Canon L-series glass and third party Tamron with no issues whatsoever.

It’s dual not duel 🤺

@markwiemels

9 ай бұрын

It's an accent, I live in Australia. I say a lot of words the Aussie way.

None. Zero support from third party lenses.

@markwiemels

Жыл бұрын

It's sad.

I would buy another m6 Mark II instead..these cameras bring no real innovation and lack the portability of the M series; Canon's choice to make the RF system closed is incomprehensible.

@okaro6595

Жыл бұрын

The future is clearly on the R series. M is a dead end, whether it is 5 or 10 years. After that EF-M lenses will be useless.

@dice3809

Жыл бұрын

@@okaro6595 fine I will stay with the M until it brakes. Then I will move to Sony.

@chuckshingledecker2216

Жыл бұрын

@@okaro6595 I am adapting EF-S and EF onto my M6ii. Had I known they were going to finally release the R7 I may have waited, but I really bought the M6ii for hiking. So maybe not. But legacy glass on the M6ii is more affordable than RF glass which is insanely expensive.

@theurbanodyssey

Жыл бұрын

@@dice3809 yes..same for me! I was thinking also about Fuji

@theurbanodyssey

Жыл бұрын

@@okaro6595 5 -10 years is quite a long time...and amongst ef-m lenses and ef-s mount it is now possible to buy very good lenses at good price

You might as well talk the talk whilst you completely overlook and ignore the prices of the RF Lense's ..... Have you paid any attention to the current pricing. and inflation that is rife in your Country ... due to your dopey admin's shockingly bad policies ...???????? Obviously Not . yet you are trying soooooooooo hard to dupe folks into forking out for ethier , And as Canon has clamped down on 3rd party lenses for the RF . The beginner canon buyer will be very limited ...to what they can buy As the RF600 RF800 Budget lenses aren't the best .. whilst the other lenses are all priced over 1,000 and the prime RF800 and RF1200 Are priced sooo unrealistic they are unaffordable

@markwiemels

Жыл бұрын

I’m just comparing two cameras, and not instructing anyone to buy either. I have two videos that very harshly point out the issues of Canons 3rd part lenses decision and the price of higher quality RF lenses. My criticisms of canon, surrounding this issue, are some of the strongest on KZread.

The R10 is something you can put a small *inexpensive* lens on, and well... 🥲

@joandreas1490

Жыл бұрын

Bought m100 as travel camera for that reason. as ef-s 24 or rf-s used is simply not worth it.

@OdiumTV

Жыл бұрын

@@joandreas1490 if Canon hadn't neglected the M mount so much it would be a viable cheaper ecosystem for people... They're trying to be Sony with the "all cameras one mount" thing but forgetting the appeal of cheaper caneras also having cheaper lenses being a big purchase decision🤡