The Bréguet 482 - A Rather Elegant French "Heavy Bomber"

Ғылым және технология

French bombers of the Interwar period have a...unfortunate reputation.
But this may not be completely deserved, with unfortunate timing and events playing more of a role, which in turn leads to some intriguing "What-ifs?"
Sources for this video can be found at the relevant article on:
militarymatters.online/
If you like this content please consider supporting me at Patreon:
www.patreon.com/ednash
Want another way to help support this channel? Maybe consider buying my book on my time fighting ISIS:
amzn.to/3preYyO

Пікірлер: 195

  • @oloferixon3363
    @oloferixon33632 жыл бұрын

    Dear Mr. Nash. I thoroughly appreciate the work and research going into these snippets. With all the half-wits occupying so much space in the internet it is refreshing to come across balanced and intelligent content. Please do continue!

  • @Simon_Nonymous

    @Simon_Nonymous

    2 жыл бұрын

    Dear Mr. Erixon; one good comment like yours makes all the faults of the internet go away, and restores my faith in the human race. Thank you.

  • @oloferixon3363

    @oloferixon3363

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@Simon_Nonymous Thank you, Mr. Simon. Let's continue to fight the increasing daftness (darkness...)...

  • @Sir.suspicious
    @Sir.suspicious2 жыл бұрын

    The Lioré et Olivier 45 is also a good example of a beautiful French bomber

  • @Charlesputnam-bn9zy

    @Charlesputnam-bn9zy

    2 жыл бұрын

    The Potez 63 too. And the Breguet 691/693 that sacrificed themselves in 1940 along with the valiant British Fairey Battles.

  • @McRocket
    @McRocket2 жыл бұрын

    You've done it again, Ed. I knew nothing of this lovely plane that looks like (to me) the offspring of an He-111 and an Avro Lancaster. Thank you. ☮

  • @kyle857
    @kyle8572 жыл бұрын

    A good looking French bomber? Astounding!

  • @foreverpinkf.7603

    @foreverpinkf.7603

    2 жыл бұрын

    My thoughts as well. The first French good looking plane.

  • @jetaddicted

    @jetaddicted

    2 жыл бұрын

    Some have a lot to learn…

  • @tri3852

    @tri3852

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@foreverpinkf.7603 Monsieur Dassault would like to have a word with you....

  • @STARDRIVE

    @STARDRIVE

    2 жыл бұрын

    Looking weird was part of the specifications. Something must have gone wrong.

  • @foreverpinkf.7603

    @foreverpinkf.7603

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@tri3852 Please, I´m here.

  • @TomPrickVixen
    @TomPrickVixen2 жыл бұрын

    Potez and Bloch had some modern looking planes and projects, I even like their model: P. 540 and MB.210

  • @jb6027
    @jb60272 жыл бұрын

    It's interesting how France went from making the absolute fugly-est and bizarre aircraft ever built, to making, post war, the most elegant, beautiful , and world class performers found anywhere.

  • @godsowndrunk1118

    @godsowndrunk1118

    2 жыл бұрын

    The Germans had a few years to educate them... Although I think some of the more stubborn ones went to work for Citroen, designing cars...

  • @treszenrv9401

    @treszenrv9401

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@godsowndrunk1118 cv2 is pre-war design

  • @godsowndrunk1118

    @godsowndrunk1118

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@treszenrv9401 ....no kidding? It sure looks like it.... they were still selling Cv4's in the early 80's when I was in the Army in Germany.thanks , thought it was post war.... one of the aircraft designers must have been moonlighting...

  • @treszenrv9401

    @treszenrv9401

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@godsowndrunk1118 Production stopped in 1990. Projet TPV (Toute petite voiture) (Very Small Car). Citroën made 250 cars in 1939 but they are nearly all scrapped to hide the project from Germans authorities.

  • @tonyz7216

    @tonyz7216

    10 ай бұрын

    When it comes to beauty, France's early war aircraft have nothing to envy to other countries. Just google Dewoitine 520 and 551, Potez 630, Lioré-Olivier 451, Bloch 174, Bréguet 693... All deserving a video from Ed.

  • @HamiltonStandard
    @HamiltonStandard2 жыл бұрын

    Ed Nash's 20th century what-if's are the most informed what-if's in all of 21st century aviation historical analysis on this medium, bar none . . ! Long live Ed Nash . . !

  • @joeschenk8400
    @joeschenk84002 жыл бұрын

    Yes, yes..do send us the Halifax, one of my favorites. I do enjoy your work on these obscuro-planes, ones I would never know about without your videos. 👍

  • @bigblue6917

    @bigblue6917

    2 жыл бұрын

    I always thought the Halifax did not get the attention it deserved. It was doing much of the heavy lifting before the Lancaster even turned up.

  • @joeschenk8400

    @joeschenk8400

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@bigblue6917 Yep, I agree. I think the Halifax and B-24 are the best LOOKING 4 engine heavies of WWII.

  • @bigblue6917

    @bigblue6917

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@joeschenk8400 There was a B-24 which flew the 25 mission before any B-17 did. Unfortunately it crashed into a mountain in Iceland killing a USAAF general who was onboard. So it never got the attention it deserved for what it achieved.

  • @joeschenk8400

    @joeschenk8400

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@bigblue6917 Wow, I had never heard of this, thanks.

  • @RaduB.
    @RaduB.2 жыл бұрын

    We do need an episode about the HP Halifax! And this Bréguet was completely new to me!...

  • @steveshoemaker6347
    @steveshoemaker63472 жыл бұрын

    lf is the biggest little word in history....Thanks Ed Nash....From Old Navy flying Shoe🇺🇸

  • @williamlloyd3769
    @williamlloyd37692 жыл бұрын

    My favorite French interwar aircraft is the late 1930s Bugatti 100P. A recreation is on display at the Mullin Automotive Museum, Oxnard, California. Wicked looking speed demon!

  • @mikearmstrong8483

    @mikearmstrong8483

    2 жыл бұрын

    I grew up in Oxnard and I've never heard of this place. Is it new?

  • @dcanmore

    @dcanmore

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@mikearmstrong8483 opened 2010

  • @williamlloyd3769

    @williamlloyd3769

    4 ай бұрын

    @@mikearmstrong8483- unfortunately the museum closed in February 2024 after the owner died; three vehicles were donated to the Peterson Museum in Los Angeles and the balance are scheduled to be auctioned in April / May

  • @henryfondle725
    @henryfondle7252 жыл бұрын

    can you give the Lioré et Olivier LeO 45 a video no one knows about it

  • @peppermill7163
    @peppermill71632 жыл бұрын

    Thanks, it's a relief to hear that they were finding their way though a bit late.

  • @neiloflongbeck5705
    @neiloflongbeck57052 жыл бұрын

    It wasn't Handley Page that had doubts about the RR Vulture but the Air Ministry. The Air Ministry asked HP to rework the HP.56 as a 4-engined bomber to produce the HP.57.

  • @johnforsyth7987
    @johnforsyth7987 Жыл бұрын

    This is a wonderful "What If" video. Thank you for making me aware of yet another WWII ear aircraft that I was not even aware of. Thank You.

  • @RobSchofield
    @RobSchofield2 жыл бұрын

    I'm continually amazed at the airframes you present on this channel - this is a really beautiful aircraft, and I've never heard of it before! Excellent, keep it up: a very enjoyable channel.

  • @eftalanquest
    @eftalanquest2 жыл бұрын

    my imagination of events: Ed Nash (editing): listening back to his recording while editing his video Ed Nash (recording): "1836" Ed Nash (editing): takes a good look at the palm of his hand and audibly exhales Ed Nash (editing): frantically puts in overlay correcting himself

  • @TheVigilante2000

    @TheVigilante2000

    2 жыл бұрын

    It happens, but the way you said it with such assuredness...

  • @sirbum1918

    @sirbum1918

    2 жыл бұрын

    I had to stop and think when he said 1836.

  • @Itsjustme-Justme
    @Itsjustme-Justme2 жыл бұрын

    Well, it was by far the fastest bomber of the world before the Mosquito arrived. Put into service unchanged, it would have been fast enough to fly unarmed, unescorted daylight missions against Germany as long as the Bf109F was not in service and nighttime missions throughout the war. The problem about that is, from a bomb load perspective it was a medium bomber, not a heavy bomber. That limited bomb load is not very effective in strategic bombing. But its performance was based on - for the time - very clean aerodynamics combined with a - for a bomber - good power to weight ratio. For making it that fast, the prototype was built without any armor protection or weapons. And it already used the most powerful engines the French had. So, where - besides adding high altitude superchargers - is the developement potential of this design? All in all the Bloch 162 was a more promising design and its developement was a few months ahead of the Breguet 482.

  • @basilreid257
    @basilreid257 Жыл бұрын

    Now this one I had not clue about it looked very promising. Thanks for adding to my knowledge of unknown aircraft.

  • @Wideoval73
    @Wideoval732 жыл бұрын

    Good overview of an aircraft I had never heard of. Sounds like it had a lot of potential.

  • @deca0
    @deca02 жыл бұрын

    The story of the pre war French aircraft industry is that of a tragic one

  • @Charlesputnam-bn9zy

    @Charlesputnam-bn9zy

    2 жыл бұрын

    Yet the Farman bomber got to bomb Berlin all by itself in June 1940 !

  • @Charlesputnam-bn9zy
    @Charlesputnam-bn9zy2 жыл бұрын

    Thank you for retrieving from oblivion these gems of human genius, that each in its own way contributed to aviation progress. Can you make a video on the Grumman XF-5 very optimistically named ''Skyrocket" ? Thank you !

  • @simonmcowan6874
    @simonmcowan6874 Жыл бұрын

    Wow, that's a really nice piece of kit, shame one doesn't survive.

  • @lotharvonrichthofen4474
    @lotharvonrichthofen44742 жыл бұрын

    Always enjoy your content

  • @donaldgrant9067
    @donaldgrant90672 жыл бұрын

    As great as that aircraft might have been it couldn't change the fact that the French leadership was totally out of touch with the way WWII was going to be fought.

  • @sugarnads

    @sugarnads

    2 жыл бұрын

    Awww. Terrible they didnt want an entire generation of young men dead Again.

  • @06colkurtz
    @06colkurtz2 жыл бұрын

    Well done again Sir

  • @katana1430
    @katana14302 жыл бұрын

    Perhaps a video on the carrier aircraft of the Graf Zeppelin? They had some-interesting- ideas about what made for a good naval aircraft. Please keep up the good work.

  • @mre7862
    @mre78622 жыл бұрын

    Beautiful lines on it.

  • @Paladin1873
    @Paladin18732 жыл бұрын

    The Halifax has always looked to me like a British version of the American B-24 Liberator. I would appreciate a story on this largely forgotten bomber.

  • @CreeperOnYourHouse
    @CreeperOnYourHouse2 жыл бұрын

    The first time i saw the F 222 in war thunder, both of its engine nacelles were on fire, giving it the appearance of a jet aircraft. This genuinely had me confused until I saw it unmolested in the hangar several days later. I now call it the br 1.7 jet bomber as a joke to myself.

  • @40nakedniggasonahugespacecraft

    @40nakedniggasonahugespacecraft

    2 жыл бұрын

    Unmolested had me dying

  • @lordwintertown8284

    @lordwintertown8284

    2 жыл бұрын

    If you know how to put out engine fires the Farman Aviation Works F.222.2 can survive over seven fires... (A match over Sicily saw me with seven engine fires).

  • @CreeperOnYourHouse

    @CreeperOnYourHouse

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@lordwintertown8284 A truly powerful demonstration of early jet technology

  • @Knuck_Knucks
    @Knuck_Knucks2 жыл бұрын

    A fine looking aircraft indeed. Thx Ed!

  • @christopherjones4767
    @christopherjones47672 жыл бұрын

    Given the 'sexy' reputation of the French, something SERIOUSLY went wrong in aircraft design during the inter-war period ! 😄. Thanks for the insight - genuinely very interesting ! 👍

  • @firestorm165

    @firestorm165

    2 жыл бұрын

    That something was a card carrying Marxist being in charge of the air ministry who thought giving the unions literally everything they asked for was the solution to everything

  • @burningb2439
    @burningb24392 жыл бұрын

    For the older " Flying Green houses " , the French I think let Romance rule the Drawing board ..but the Breguet looked the part , but with a wee bit less of the nose glazing ..good Vid .

  • @FilthyTheDog1
    @FilthyTheDog12 жыл бұрын

    A Halifax video would be great...but of even more interest would be one about the Short Stirling, the third and largest of the RAF heavies, of which none survive today so it remains relatively forgotten.

  • @Otokichi786
    @Otokichi7862 жыл бұрын

    It is/was amazing that Luftwaffe fighter pilots didn't go ROTFLMAO when they saw pre-war French bomber aircraft.;)

  • @markpatterson4917
    @markpatterson49172 жыл бұрын

    Another great find and video. Reminds me of a de Havilland albatross converted to a bomber with a green house up front. Looked quite good shame it never got to the front line.

  • @bigblue6917
    @bigblue69172 жыл бұрын

    Finally. A French bomber that actually looked good. Rather then something which had had a number of extensions added.

  • @bigblue6917

    @bigblue6917

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@michaelbizon444 I supposed we'd have to do back the the flying apartment to do Art Deco.

  • @lebaillidessavoies3889
    @lebaillidessavoies38892 жыл бұрын

    It looks like the result of the copulations of a HE111 with a Lancaster......awful...

  • @mikepette4422
    @mikepette44222 жыл бұрын

    Not that you ever will but IF you do you can always bring us a video on any of these odd French bombers from the 20's and 30's because there's literally dozens. I have a small and unimpressive book called The "World's Great Bombers" by Chris Chant nothing to recommend about it but there a couple of great quotes about French bombers of the 20's. When discussing the LeO 20 he says "The french began to develop the type of angular ugliness that typified most of their bombers until the later 1930s" And then best of all with he says: " With its mass of excrescences such turrets, gondolas and fixed landing gear, the Bloch MB 200 virtually epitomised the concept of aerodynamic drag." A perfect description of a lot of bombers not just French from the 1920's.

  • @seflyingfaultier5806
    @seflyingfaultier58062 жыл бұрын

    The engine cowlings look like they just sawed off the front halves of fighter planes and put them on a flying baguette.

  • @brianedwards7142
    @brianedwards71422 жыл бұрын

    Why am I thinking of when the guys on Top Gear tried to make a flying Robin Reliant?

  • @comentedonakeyboard
    @comentedonakeyboard2 жыл бұрын

    Incroyable!

  • @Simon_Nonymous
    @Simon_Nonymous2 жыл бұрын

    Halifax video - yes please! I still haven't read the Haynes manual I bought, nor have I been to the one at RAF Elvington. My grandfather was an instrument fitter on the Mk IIIs from 1944 onwards, it'd be cool to know more.

  • @johndavey72
    @johndavey722 жыл бұрын

    Cripes ! It missed the ugly stick ! Thanks Ed.

  • @DC.409
    @DC.4092 жыл бұрын

    An excellent and enjoyable explanation of the French aircraft development. I look forward to your review of the Halifax at some point, my great uncle was a flight engineer in Bomber Command and preferred the Halifax over the Lancaster stating it was sturdier and better to escape from giving the crew a better chance to survive. I would welcome your analysis was there any technical truth to this, or just down to personal preference.

  • @brucebaxter6923
    @brucebaxter69232 жыл бұрын

    Beautiful

  • @tallthinkev
    @tallthinkev2 жыл бұрын

    My eyes, my eyes. No, NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

  • @luvr381
    @luvr3812 жыл бұрын

    Hi Ed!

  • @peterboy209
    @peterboy2092 жыл бұрын

    Slick looking aircraft, 👍

  • @mikepette4422
    @mikepette44222 жыл бұрын

    You know if you ever get tired of bringing failed plane designs you could do worse than a video on the Hawker Hart family. A hugely important and successful 1920's design. I'd like to know more about it I am sure there's lots to talk about considering how many nations used at least 1 plane from that family.

  • @Seraphus87

    @Seraphus87

    2 жыл бұрын

    I support this.

  • @Danger_mouse
    @Danger_mouse2 жыл бұрын

    What a great looking aircraft for the era 👌

  • @uingaeoc3905
    @uingaeoc39052 жыл бұрын

    Certainly do the HP Halifax and the First of the Four Engine Heavies the Short Sterling. Then do the What Might Have Been Daddy of Them All the Vickers Windsor.

  • @TheIndianalain
    @TheIndianalain2 жыл бұрын

    Elegant Indeed! With a little more development, it could have made something like a four-engined Moustique (french for Mosquito ;-) ).

  • @TheWareek
    @TheWareek2 жыл бұрын

    at the 1:36 point, You said 1836 what a wonderful piece of forward planning by the British and French air ministry's.

  • @thelizardking3036
    @thelizardking30362 жыл бұрын

    Issuing a specification for a heavy bomber, 67 years before the first powered flight. Now that is a level of foresight you just don’t see anymore.

  • @cesarvidelac
    @cesarvidelac2 жыл бұрын

    Oh, gee... I wish to see a real action film version of Dastardly and Muttley in Their Flying Machines. I've commented similar before but this old design really outrun the cartoon show! 😸

  • @rojaunjames747
    @rojaunjames7472 жыл бұрын

    Brillant video has always, can you give us an update on the Myanmar civil war or an update on the Ethiopian war.

  • @spikeyflo
    @spikeyflo2 жыл бұрын

    What a beautiful aircraft.

  • @ronjon7942
    @ronjon79422 жыл бұрын

    The fuselage cross section has a distinct airfoil shape, did it contribute to lift similar to the Connie’s fuselage?

  • @kevinmcdonald6446
    @kevinmcdonald64462 жыл бұрын

    The French always find a way. It's not the way any one else chooses, but it's a way.

  • @johnjephcote7636
    @johnjephcote76362 жыл бұрын

    The vertical stabilisers seem too small. I recall all the trouble with the Halifax Mks i&II.

  • @3dfreak2000
    @3dfreak20002 жыл бұрын

    Most of the pre-war and WW2 french bombers looks like Cafe/bakeries on wings.

  • @martindice5424
    @martindice54242 жыл бұрын

    Oooo la la! C’est tres sexy mon ami!! However - a medium bomber? With FOUR engines? Never going to make manufacturing, economic or operational sense Ed. Phwooar! What a looker though! 👍👍❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️

  • @Spey_Phantom
    @Spey_Phantom2 жыл бұрын

    you should look at the Belgian built Stampe SV-10 and LACAB GR8

  • @easynovember5423
    @easynovember54232 жыл бұрын

    scrapping that plane and not preserving it at least for static display was a crime!!!!

  • @Zorglub1966

    @Zorglub1966

    2 жыл бұрын

    After war France was ruined (rationing tickets were in use until november 1949), had Indochina war on her hands, social unrest, and no dedicated structure available, no museum to store or to maintain it.

  • @michaelvalenzuela2528
    @michaelvalenzuela25282 жыл бұрын

    The French Bombers of that time look like they were designed using an "Etch-a-Sketch".

  • @alexsandersmith1880
    @alexsandersmith18802 жыл бұрын

    It was potentially a four engine French extra medium mosquito bomber.

  • @Zorglub1966
    @Zorglub19662 жыл бұрын

    Some French bombers of the Interwar period were certainly hugly, weird, whatever you want, but never, never cheesy!

  • @unclenogbad1509
    @unclenogbad15092 жыл бұрын

    Another one that looks like it should be in an 'alternative-history' movie - where do you get them from? And when is that movie going to be made?

  • @williamkoppos7039
    @williamkoppos70392 жыл бұрын

    1:36.....1836? Now THAT'S forward thinking.

  • @atilllathehun1212
    @atilllathehun12122 жыл бұрын

    The LeO 451 was another French bomber that was quite the looker.

  • @f1ixm
    @f1ixm2 ай бұрын

    Good morning. There was no communist sabotage, it was a rumor spread by the Vichy government to find a scapegoat for their incompetence. The material was produced in a hurry, very little tested when it left the manufacturing line, so it was more fragile. Thank you for this video.

  • @steveclark5357
    @steveclark53572 жыл бұрын

    @1:36 1836? bombers, wow, no disrespect intended I am far,far from your level, I love your work Mr. Nash

  • @simonallen6427
    @simonallen64272 жыл бұрын

    Like the Ref to the nineteenth century#1

  • @macjim
    @macjim2 жыл бұрын

    Yes, do… the Halifax would be an interesting story.

  • @pierredecine1936
    @pierredecine19362 жыл бұрын

    What a beauté !

  • @HeadPack
    @HeadPack2 жыл бұрын

    There seems to be some resemblance with the Heinkel 111, especially with the shape of the fuselage and the cockpit. Could the French designers have known about the He-111?

  • @Seraphus87

    @Seraphus87

    2 жыл бұрын

    As far as I remember early versions of the He-111 were deployed in the Spanish civil war and it was also built for civilian purposes, so the French absolutely knew about it. That being said, the He-111 family started out with a quite "normal" looking stepped nose and cockpit, only switching production to the iconic rounded/steppless nose & cockpit later down the line.

  • @ddd3240
    @ddd32402 жыл бұрын

    Have truly enjoyed the French Aircraft presented lately. Not much information on the net about them. Dutch aircraft would be appreciated as well.

  • @hertzair1186
    @hertzair1186 Жыл бұрын

    The French engineers drank wine whilst designing…..

  • @briansteffmagnussen9078
    @briansteffmagnussen90782 жыл бұрын

    Amiot 143 the flying omnibus.

  • @mbryson2899
    @mbryson28992 жыл бұрын

    Hallyfacks? Never heard of it... ;) Oh... wait... yeah... It's just that no one ever *talks* about it.

  • @mbryson2899

    @mbryson2899

    2 жыл бұрын

    The German "all bombers must dive!" directive cost them a lot. They had a diamond right in their palms...but honestly I never would have figured Breguet to have designed a sound and useful aircraft given what interwar French bombers usually offered.

  • @jsmith3772
    @jsmith37722 жыл бұрын

    It looks like a 4-engine Caproni CA311

  • @mannywilliams6409
    @mannywilliams64092 жыл бұрын

    to quote, "the French follow no one and no one follows the French"

  • @willhovell9019
    @willhovell90192 жыл бұрын

    Interesting. Pity that they weren't used against Nazi Germany in 1939 early 1940

  • @LuqmanHM
    @LuqmanHM2 жыл бұрын

    Ed, we need more info on how the French aviation industry were 'sabotage' before WW2

  • @kellybreen5526
    @kellybreen55262 жыл бұрын

    Never say never....

  • @preonmodel8354
    @preonmodel83542 жыл бұрын

    Nice plane which reminded me of pre war glider designs... shame one doesn’t exsist, what’s will all this scrapping all the time 🙄

  • @johnstirling6597
    @johnstirling65972 жыл бұрын

    That low set rear tail plane with the twin fins looks wrong, a single fin with a higher plane ,(B17 ish) with rear gun position would have worked well.

  • @tomloverin9073
    @tomloverin90732 жыл бұрын

    At 4:00, two engines have 3 bladed propellers and two have 2 bladed propellers. I've never seen that before.

  • @3ducs

    @3ducs

    2 жыл бұрын

    Look carefully, all props are three bladed.

  • @i_like_ya_cut_g2350

    @i_like_ya_cut_g2350

    2 жыл бұрын

    all of them have three blades

  • @tomloverin9073

    @tomloverin9073

    2 жыл бұрын

    Upon further investigation.... Thanks.

  • @Niinsa62
    @Niinsa622 жыл бұрын

    This aircraft looks quite nice! But still not quite as nice as the Amiot 354, which is another very good-looking French aircraft. The French had some very sleek designs under development.

  • @Zeppflyer
    @Zeppflyer2 жыл бұрын

    The Breguet Baguette.

  • @mickyday2008
    @mickyday20082 жыл бұрын

    Three were made and they all flew backwards

  • @andrewharper3165
    @andrewharper31652 жыл бұрын

    The French at it again.

  • @okshadowbannedjet7981
    @okshadowbannedjet79812 жыл бұрын

    very nice aircraft, a bit like Lockheed Constellation, non compromising aerodynamics.

  • @nowthenzen
    @nowthenzen2 жыл бұрын

    Perhaps the one the Germans found looked like a passenger airplane bc it did not have weapons?

  • @HarborLockRoad
    @HarborLockRoad2 жыл бұрын

    Though classified as a heavy bomber, its weapons load and armament was less. Hey, its all about that Gallic style, baby! Lol

  • @lordwintertown8284
    @lordwintertown82842 жыл бұрын

    It must be noted that not ever French design was a horriored sight for there were many designs that looked pretty. So bomber examples: Lioré et Olivier 45 LeO 45 a streamline twin engine bomber that saw heavy service from both Free French FAFL & Vichy French Forces. Marcel Bloch M.B.170 designs another streamlined aircraft that was used as a light bomber and reconnaissance aircraft and saw service with the Aéronavale post war, Also the aviator Antonie De Saint-Exupéry flew the M.B.174's during early war time. M.B.162 another fine four engine heavy bomber that unfortunately never saw service as a bomber but as a transport by the luftwaffe & the Armee de l'Air postwar. Another designs that ine could say was a nice sight especially being a countarotating prop twin engine interceptor the Arsenal VB.10.C, large aircraft that was designed pre war but inly flew post war. Still if we want to continue with WTF designs lets see the Bréguet Br.693AB2... WTH was Bréguets problem. E, It must be not I mast be oops.

  • @underwaterpowerarmor8700

    @underwaterpowerarmor8700

    2 жыл бұрын

    bréguets weren t thinking they were high on wine , champagne and cigars

  • @bobmarshall3700
    @bobmarshall37002 жыл бұрын

    It can't be French, it's not UGLY!

  • @user-hu7lw4le1k
    @user-hu7lw4le1k2 жыл бұрын

    I suspect most of us might be of monocoque design.

  • @maladroit5376
    @maladroit53762 жыл бұрын

    An interesting aircraft ? Could it not have been developed into a civilian aircraft after the war ? (Or maybe something similar was ? )